Abstract
Both close inbreeding and distant outbreeding may reduce fitness below the level of individuals with intermediate parental relatedness. In the haplodiploid plant-inhabiting predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis, which is patchily distributed within and among host plants, fitness is indeed reduced in the short term, i.e. by a single generation of inbreeding. However, in the medium to long term (multiple generations), distant out-breeding should provide for favorable demographic founder effects in isolated populations. We tested this prediction in isolated experimental lineages founded by females mated to a sibling (close inbreeding), a male from the same population (intermediate relatedness) or a male from another population (distant outbreeding) and monitored lineage growth and persistence over four generations. Cross-generationally, lineages founded by distantly outbred females performed the best, i.e. produced the most descendants. However, this was solely due to superior performance from the F2 generation onwards, whereas in the F1 generation, lineages founded by females mated to males from their own population (intermediate relatedness) performed the best, as predicted from short-term in- and out-breeding depression effects. At the genetic level, this result was most likely due to distantly outbred founders introducing higher allelic variability and lower homozygosity levels, counterbalancing inbreeding depression, which inevitably occurs in isolated lineages, from the F2 generation onwards.
Introduction
Founder effects, i.e. effects emerging from founding of populations/lineages by a subset of individuals of the parental population, have decisive influence on the occurrence and intensity of inbreeding depression [1,2]. Founder effects change the genetic composition, usually by reducing variation, of daughter populations/lineages relative to the parental population and are thus especially relevant for inbreeding by organisms structured in small and fragmented or locally isolated populations with limited genetic exchange [3,4].
The detrimental effects of close inbreeding were already studied and documented by Darwin (1876) [5] for various plant species. At the genetic level, increased homozygosity commonly results in fitness decrease, called inbreeding depression, with overdominance (general advantage of heterozygotes) or partial dominance (homozygosity of recessive deleterious alleles) as the underlying mechanisms [6–8]. At the species level, averaged across individuals and assuming partial dominance as causal mechanism, the deleterious effects of inbreeding depression are expected to be lower in haplodiploids than in diplodiploids. The reason is that in haplodiploid organisms with hemizygous males, recessive deleterious alleles should be more easily and more quickly purged than in diplodiploid organisms with heterozygous males [9–12]. Nonetheless, while at large inbreeding depression is indeed less severe in haplodiploid than in diplodiploid organisms [13–15], excessive inbreeding may cause significant negative fitness effects in haplodiploids as well [10,16–18]. Towards the distant end of the mate relatedness continuum, also excessive outbreeding may cause significant negative effects [19–21]. Common underlying reasons are behavioral incompatibilities at the phenotypic level, and genetic incompatibilities, break-down of co-adapted gene complexes and maladaptation at the genotypic level [7,22–23]. Therefore, according to optimal outbreeding theory [19], intermediate levels of mate relatedness should provide for the highest fitness [22,24].
Nonetheless, regarding the effects of mate relatedness on in- and out-breeding depression, the time scale and associated number of generations, i.e. distinction between short- (one generation) and medium- to long-term (multiple generations) effects, are decisive variables. Short-term uni-generational effects of mate relatedness on in- and out-breeding depression may differ from medium- to long-term trans-generational effects. The effects of chronic inbreeding, which inevitably occurs in isolated lineages founded by single or few individuals, because of increasing mate relatedness over time, should heavily depend on the genetic composition and diversity introduced by the founder individuals, i.e. their in- and outbreeding status [25–27]. Outbred founders should provide for increased genetic variability and/or decreased homozygosity, favoring trans-generational lineage growth and persistence. Under these circumstances, distant outbreeding by founders may be sub-optimal in the short term but may be more favorable than close and intermediate founder mate relatedness levels in the medium and long run [26,28].
We addressed this issue, that is, trans-generational effects of founder relatedness, in isolated experimental lineages of plant-inhabiting predatory mites Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Phytoseiulus persimilis are haplodiploid, with both females and males arising from fertilized eggs but males losing the paternal chromosome set during embryogenesis, a phenomenon dubbed pseudo-arrhenotoky [29]. Phytoseiulus persimilis are specialized predators of herbivorous spider mites, which are patchily distributed both at the local (within leaves and plants) and regional (among plants) spatial scale. Due to the spider mites’ patchy distribution pattern and mutual attraction, also their predators, P. persimilis, are patchily distributed within and among plants [30,31]. Local dispersal by P. persimilis occurs by ambulation whereas long-distance dispersal is passive using the wind [32]. Phytoseiulus persimilis’ prey specialization level, patchy distribution pattern and dispersal modes set the stage for the occurrence of in- and out-breeding and founder effects. However, knowledge of the consequences of in- and out-breeding by P. persimilis is very limited [33,34] and experimental studies addressing founder effects are lacking. Phytoseiulus persimilis has a short developmental time (5 to 6 d at 25°C) and high fecundity (up to 5 eggs/d at 25°C), resulting in intrinsic rates of increase (rm) >0.3/d [35,36]. Its specialized feeding habits and high population growth capacity render P. persimilis a highly efficacious, globally used biocontrol agent of spider mites [36]. Knowing the consequences of in- and out-breeding is imperative for optimizing P. persimilis’ mass-rearing and release strategies.
Recently, we scrutinized short-term (one generation) individual fitness effects of mate relatedness in P. persimilis [34]. In accordance with optimal outbreeding [19], we observed that an intermediate level of mate relatedness (same population) resulted in higher female fitness (higher fecundity) than excessively close (siblings) or distant (from geographically widely separated populations) mate relatedness [34]. The present study aimed at elucidating demographic founder effects, at graded levels of genetic relatedness between the founding female and her mate (sibling, same population and different population), in experimental lineages derived from two geographically widely separated populations of P. persimilis, Sicily and Greece. We hypothesized that chronically inbreeding lineages founded by outbred females, i.e. females mated to males from another population, produce more descendants and persist at higher abundance levels than lineages founded by sib-mated females and lineages founded by females mated to males from their own population. To experimentally increase the likelihood of occurrence and detectability of founder effects on inbreeding depression of P. persimilis, all lineages were subjected to food stress, i.e. held under limited prey conditions over 40 days, allowing about four generations (generation time [T] is ~10 to 11 d at 25°C) [36,37]. Under stressful conditions, in the short to medium term, recessive alleles are commonly more detrimental, and increase inbreeding depression effects, compared to benign conditions [26,38,39]. In the long term, chronically prevailing stress conditions may promote purging of deleterious recessive alleles and thereby lead to reduced inbreeding depression, as for example shown for fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster [40,41].
Materials and methods
Experimental animals, population origins and rearing
Experimental animals derived from iso-female lines established from two laboratory-reared populations of P. persimilis. One population was founded by specimens collected in Sicily and the other by specimens collected in Greece [42]. Phytoseiulus persimilis is native at both sampling locations [43]; wide geographic separation suggests minimal genetic exchange, if occurring at all, between P. persimilis from Sicily and Greece. Each population was founded by 50 to 100 individuals and population sizes fluctuated between ~50 and a few hundred individuals. Both populations were maintained in the laboratory for about 6 to 7 years before starting the experiment.
In the laboratory, the predators were reared on separate artificial arenas consisting of plastic tiles (15 x 15 x 0.2 cm), delimited by water-saturated tissue paper, and resting on water-saturated foam cubes in plastic boxes (20 x 20 x 6 cm) half-filled with water. The predators were fed by adding leaves of common bean Phaseolus vulgaris L., infested by Tetranychus urticae Koch, onto the arena at two to three-day intervals [44,45]. Tetranychus urticae was reared on whole common bean plants P. vulgaris. For the experiments, the spider mites were brushed from infested leaves, using a paint brush or a mite brushing machine (BioQuip, CA, USA), onto glass plates, and then either singly picked up and placed into acrylic cages using a fine red marten’s hair brush or directly brushed onto detached leaf arenas or artificial tile arenas. Plants were grown at room temperature 23 ± 2°C and 16:8 h L:D photoperiod. All rearing and experimental units were kept in a climate chamber at 25 ± 1°C, 65 ± 5% RH and 16:8 h L:D photoperiod.
Establishing iso-female lines
Founder females of the experimental lineages came from iso-female lines of P. persimilis, which were established as described by Atalay & Schausberger (2018) [34]. To establish iso-female lines, gravid females were randomly withdrawn from the stock populations and placed on spider mite-infested detached bean leaf arenas, each consisting of a trifoliate leaf placed upside down on a water-saturated foam cuboid, kept in a small plastic box (10 x 10 x 6 cm) half-filled with water, and delimited by water-saturated tissue paper. Eggs laid by the predators were transferred to new T. urticae-infested arenas and reared there until the deutonymphal stage. Deutonymphal females were singly isolated in cylindrical acrylic cages of 15 mm diameter and 3 mm height, laser-cut into rectangular acrylic plates (7.5 x 2.5 x 0.3 cm), closed with fine gauze at the bottom and a microscope slide on the upper side [46]. After reaching adulthood, each female was mated with a male randomly withdrawn from the stock population. Offspring of these couples represented a family (iso-female line) and were the individuals used in the experiment. Two families from each population (Sicily and Greece) were used in the experiment (Fig 1). Using the family design allowed comparing in- and out-breeding by individuals having the same set of alleles [39]. According to Nelson & Greef (2011) [47], the inbreeding coefficient (ft) [48] for offspring of full sib-mates (0.25) is almost equal in haplodiploids and diplodiploids [49]. In our experiment, we assumed inbreeding coefficients (f1) of 0 for offspring of distantly outbreeding couples (different populations), 0.125 for offspring of couples of the same population and 0.275 for offspring of sib couples. The latter two coefficients were based on the assumption of parental f0 = 0.1 because founders were withdrawn from closed and thus inbred laboratory populations [50]. The predicted increase in inbreeding coefficients of the three types of experimental lineages (Fig 2) was estimated with Populus 5.5 [51].
Fig 1. Crossing design used to establish three levels of in- and outbreeding in the founder females of the experimental lineages of P. persimilis (original figure [34]).
Families were iso-female lines established from populations originating from Sicily and Greece. Mates came either from the same family (siblings), or from different families of the same population, or from different families from different populations.
Fig 2. Predicted trans-generational development of Wright’s (1922) [48] inbreeding coefficient (ft) in chronically inbreeding experimental lineages of P. persimilis founded by females mated to a brother, a male from the same population or a male from another population (curve estimation using Populus 5.5 [51]).
Assumed female to male inbreeding coefficients (f0) of the parental generation (F0) were 0.1 for sibling and same population mates and 0 for different population mates. Accordingly, f1 was 0, 0.125 and 0.275 for offspring (F1) of founders mated to males from different populations, the same population and siblings, respectively [50].
Experimental procedure
The experiment was started by placing one virgin female and one male, at each level of genetic relatedness (siblings, same population, other population) from both populations, in acrylic cages, previously loaded with mixed spider mite stages, for 24 h (Fig 1). Cages were stored upside down on a grid in plastic boxes, the bottom of which was covered by water to warrant elevated humidity inside the cages [52]. After 24 h, the now mated females were singly placed on an acrylic arena, consisting of a plastic tile (15 x 15 x 0.2 cm) delimited by water-saturated tissue paper and resting on a water-saturated foam cuboid inside a plastic box (20 x 20 x 6 cm) half-filled with water. The predators were provided with predefined standardized amounts of mixed spider mite stages (i.e., brushed from three similarly sized bean leaves, each infested by ~50 to 80 T. urticae) in 3 d intervals. Over 40 days (allowing approximately four predator generations), we recorded the number and life stages of the predators (eggs, juveniles, adult females and adult males) in 5 d intervals. Each of the three levels of founder mate relatedness was replicated 13 to 22 times.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS 23 (IBM; Armonk, NY, USA). For analysis, we used only counts of mobile predator life stages since accurately counting predator eggs was difficult on the arenas containing live prey and their webbing, and prey corpses. We used separate generalized estimating equations (GEE [53]; normal distribution, identity link function; M-dependent correlation matrix between observation days) to compare the influence of founder inbreeding level and population origin on lineage dynamics (abundance of mobile individuals) over the whole experimental period (40 d) and split into the first generation (<15 d) and from the onset of the second generation onwards (>10 d). Model selection was based on the QIC (quasi likelihood under independence model criterion) value. Mean generation time of P. persimilis is ~10 to 11 d at 25°C [36,37,54]. In case of a significant interaction term between founder inbreeding level and population origin, we conducted additional GEEs for the influence of mate relatedness on lineage dynamics within each population origin (Sicily and Greece). For post-hoc pairwise comparisons between founder inbreeding levels, we used least significant difference tests (LSDs).
Results
Mean abundance of predator lineages over the whole experimental period was significantly influenced by the interaction between founder inbreeding level and population origin (GEE: Wald χ22 = 6.402, P = 0.04), whereas neither founder inbreeding level (Wald χ22 = 2.749, P = 0.25) nor population origin (Wald χ12 = 0.281, P = 0.59) exerted significant main effects (Fig 3). Within either population origin, mean lineage abundance varied significantly with founder inbreeding level (GEE for Sicily: Wald χ22 = 7.683, P = 0.02; Greece: Wald χ22 = 6.319, P = 0.04). For the Sicily origin, lineages founded by sib-mated females reached significantly lower abundances (on average 20 to 30% lower) than lineages founded by females mated to males from the same population or to males from Greece (LSD: P < 0.05) (Fig 3). For the Greece origin, lineages founded by females mated to males from Sicily reached significantly higher abundances (on average 20% higher) than the population founded by females mated to males from the same population (LSD: P = 0.01) (Fig 3). All other pairwise comparisons were non-significant (P > 0.05). Two lineages founded by sib-mated females (one from Sicily and one from Greece) went extinct within the F1 generation (no individuals observed on day 15 and 20, respectively). All lineages founded by females mated to males from the same or the other population persisted until the end of the experiment.
Fig 3. Trans-generational dynamics of experimental lineages founded by single P. persimilis females from Sicily and Greece.
Founding females were mated to males with graded levels of genetic relatedness (siblings, same population, different populations) and lineage abundance (number of mobile mites) recorded over 40 days, corresponding to approximately four generations.
Mean lineage abundance of the F1 generation (until day 10) was significantly influenced by founder inbreeding level (GEE: Wald χ22 = 8.878, P = 0.01) and marginally by founder population origin (Wald χ12 = 3.028, P = 0.08) but not by the interaction of founder inbreeding level and population origin (Wald χ22 = 1.979, P = 0.37) (Fig 4). For both origins, Sicily and Greece, lineages founded by females mated to males from the same population reached significantly higher abundances (on average 30 to 35% higher) than lineages founded by sib-mated females (LSD: P = 0.007) and lineages founded by females mated to males from the other population (P = 0.01).
Fig 4. Mean generation-specific abundance of experimental lineages of P. persimilis founded by single females from Sicily or Greece, mated to males with graded levels of genetic relatedness (siblings, same population, different populations).
Lineage abundance (number of mobile mites) was separately analyzed on days 5 and 10 of the experimental period (F1 generation; before F1 females started reproduction) and from day 15 onwards (F2 to F4 generations; after F1 females started reproduction). P-values refer to pairwise comparisons (LSD) between founder relatedness levels following GEE.
Mean lineage abundance from day 15 onwards (F2 to F4), i.e. after the onset of the F2 generation, was significantly influenced by founder inbreeding level (GEE: Wald χ22 = 6.602, P = 0.03) but not by founder population origin (Wald χ12 = 1.535, P = 0.21) and the interaction of founder inbreeding level and population origin (Wald χ22 = 4.121, P = 0.12) (Fig 4). For both origins, Sicily and Greece, lineages founded by females mated to males from the other population reached significantly higher abundances (on average 15 to 20% higher) than lineages founded by sib-mated females (LSD: P = 0.02) and lineages founded by females mated to males from the same population (P = 0.05).
Discussion
Our study documents demographic founder effects in dependence of the founders’ in- and out-breeding status in the haplodiploid plant-inhabiting predatory mite P. persimilis. Trans-generationally, that is, over approximately four generations, closed lineages founded by distantly outbred females (mates coming from different populations) reached higher abundance levels than lineages founded by heavily (sibling mates) and lightly (mates coming from the same population) inbred females. However, time-dependent inter-lineage comparison revealed superior performance of lineages founded by outbred females only from the F2 generation onwards, whereas in the F1 generation lineages founded by females with intermediate mate relatedness levels (same population) performed better than lineages founded by sib-mated females and lineages founded by distantly outbred females (different populations).
Superior performance of lineages founded by females with intermediate mate relatedness in the F1 generation conforms to the predictions of optimal outbreeding theory [19] and was expected from beneficial short-term (F1 generation) individual fitness effects [34]. In the short term, females mated to males from the same population have a higher fecundity and longer oviposition period than females mated to siblings and males from another population [34]. Accordingly, in this study, lineages founded by females mated to males from the same population reached higher abundances in the F1 generation than lineages founded by sib-mated females and females mated to a male from the other population.
Throughout the experiment, all lineages were provided with the same limited amount of prey, hence food stress increased with increasing predator abundance in the course of the experiment. Limited food availability is a prime stressor during population development, fostering intraspecific competition and increasing individual starvation, retarding development, decreasing reproduction, and promoting propensities to dispersal and cannibalism. Higher frequencies of deleterious recessive alleles and homozygosity make inbred individuals commonly more sensitive to stressful conditions than outbred individuals [39]. Food stress was negligible in the F1 generation but increased from the F2 generation onwards. Beginning with the F2 generation, growth and abundance of sib-mated lineages and within population lineages was similar yet lower than growth and abundance of between population lineages. Obviously, within population lineages exceeded a critical inbreeding coefficient in the F2 generation (Fig 2), beyond which inbreeding depression effects became similar to those of lineages founded by sib-mated females. At the individual phenotypic level, genetic deficiencies associated with increasing inbreeding levels, may have adversely affected diverse inter-related physiological, life history and/or behavioral traits, such as decreasing general stress resilience, decreasing tolerance of energetic constraints, increasing mortality, prolonging development, decreasing fecundity, decreasing competitive abilities, and promoting the occurrence of cannibalism and dispersal tendencies [27,55,56,57]. Pinpointing the phenotypic mechanisms underlying the differences in performance of isolated lineages emerging from in- and out-bred founders requires additional experimental work.
Inter-lineage comparison from the F2 generation onwards revealed superior performance, that is, higher population growth and abundance, of lineages founded by outbred females, most likely because of higher allelic variability and lower homozygosity frequency alleviating inbreeding depression effects. Similarly, in the seminal experiments by Ayala (1965) [25], isolated populations of fruit flies Drosophila serrata emerging from genetically diverse founders reached higher growth rates and abundances than populations founded by genetically similar individuals. Saccheri et al. (1998) [58] identified increasing extinction risk with decreasing heterozygosity in natural populations of the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Hildner, Soule, Min, & Foran (2003) [59] found an association between higher genetic variability and higher population growth rates in pocket gophers, Thomomys bottae. Agashe (2009) [60] and Agashe, Falk, & Bolnick (2011) [61] observed that populations of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, founded by genetically diverse individuals, performed better (decreased extinction risk, faster adaptation in novel environment) than populations founded by genetically similar individuals. Apart from long-term outbred founder benefits, because of higher allelic diversity, outbreeding may also exert immediate positive fitness effects on population growth by heterosis, increasing hybrid vigor in the F1 generation [7,26,38]. For example, Drake (2006) [62] suggested heterosis being the prime genetic mechanism boosting population growth (dubbed “catapult effect”), and thus promoting establishment success in the wild, of red-necked pheasants Phasianus colchicus. Similarly, Wagner, Ochocki, Crawford, Compagnoni, & Miller (2017) [63] suggested heterosis causing a catapult effect in experimental lineages of the weevil Callosobruchus maculatus. However, in our study on P. persimilis, heterosis did not play a role because in the F1 generation lineages of outbred founders did worse than lineages of founders with intermediate level of relatedness.
Overall, our findings reveal that founder relatedness decisively influences the dynamics of chronically inbreeding lineages of the predatory mite P. persimilis. Our findings are highly relevant for the use of P. persimilis and other pseudo-arrhenotokous predatory mite species in augmentative and classical biological control of herbivorous mites, aiming at medium- to long-term predator establishment in novel environments. Our study predicts that colonization, establishment success and population growth and persistence of P. persimilis and other predatory mites should be higher when releasing outbred founders [64]. Answering for how long such founder effects will last and whether purging allows populations founded by inbred founders to catch up requires further investigations
Supporting information
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Yukie Sato, University of Tsukuba, for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Open access funding was provided by the University of Vienna.
References
- 1.Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 1975;29: 1–10. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barton NH, Charlesworth B. Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1984;15: 133–164. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bretman A, Rodriguez-Munoz R, Walling CA, Slate J, Tregenza T. Fine-scale population structure, inbreeding risk and avoidance in a wild insect population. Mol Ecol 2011;20: 3045–3055. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05140.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matute DR. The role of founder effects on the evolution of reproductive isolation. J Evol Biol 2013;26: 2299–2311. 10.1111/jeb.12246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Darwin C. The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom London: John Murray; 1876. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions v. 3 Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Ecol Syst 1987;18: 237–268. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetics Research 1999;74: 329–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crozier RH. Adaptive consequences of male haploidy In Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies, and control Vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. pp. 201–222. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Werren JH. The evolution of inbreeding in haplodiploid organisms In Thornhill NW, editor. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. pp. 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Charlesworth D, Willis JH. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009;10: 783–796. 10.1038/nrg2664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tien NSH, Sabelis MW, Egas M. Inbreeding depression and purging in a haplodiploid: gender-related effects. Heredity 2015;114: 327–332. 10.1038/hdy.2014.106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hartl DL. Some aspects of natural selection on arrhenotokous populations. Am Zool. 1971;11: 309–325. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Antolin MF. A genetic perspective on mating systems and sex ratios of parasitoid wasps. Res Popul Ecol 1999;41: 29–37. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Henter HJ. Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution 2003;57: 1793–1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brückner D. Why are there inbreeding effects in haplodiploid systems? Evolution 1978;32: 456–458. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb00661.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Saito Y, Sahara K, Mori K. Inbreeding depression by recessive deleterious genes affecting female fecundity of a haplodiploid mite. J Evol Biol. 2000;13: 668–678. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vala F, Breeuwer JAJ, Sabelis MW. Sorting out the effects of Wolbachia, genotype and inbreeding on life-history traits of a spider mite. Exp Appl Acarol. 2003;29: 253–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bateson P. Optimal outbreeding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genetics 1995;29: 305–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pusey A, Wolf M. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11: 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shields WM. The natural and unnatural history of inbreeding and outbreeding In Thornhill NW, editor. The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives on Population Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. pp. 143–169. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edmands S. Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility? Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17: 520–527. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Puurtinen M. Mate choice for optimal (k)inbreeding. Evolution 2011;65: 501–505. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01145.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ayala FJ. Evolution of fitness in experimental populations of Drosophila serrata. Science 1965;150: 903–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Keller LF, Waller DM. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17: 230–241. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Szücs M, Melbourne BA, Tuff T, Weiss-Lehman C, Hufbauer RA. Genetic and demographic founder effects have long-term fitness consequences for colonising populations. Ecol Lett. 2017;20: 436–444. 10.1111/ele.12743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lynch M. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 1991;45: 622–629. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04333.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sabelis MW, Nagelkerke CJ. Evolution of pseudo-arrhenotoky. Exp Appl Acarol. 1988;4: 301–318. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sabelis MW. Development In Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. a. pp. 43–53. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muleta MG, Schausberger P. Smells familiar: group-joining decisions of predatory mites are mediated by olfactory cues of social familiarity. Anim Behav. 2013;86: 507–512. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sabelis MW, Dicke M. Long range dispersal and searching behavior In Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. pp. 131–140. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Poe SL, Enns WR. Effects of inbreeding on closed populations of predaceous mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can Entomol. 1970;102: 1222–1229. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Atalay D, Schausberger P. Balancing in- and out-breeding by the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Exp Appl Acarol. 2018;74: 159–169. 10.1007/s10493-018-0225-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takafuji A, Chant DA. Comparative studies on two species of predacious mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) with special reference to their responses to the density of prey. Res Popul Ecol. 1976;17: 255–310. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sabelis MW. Capacity for population increase In Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. b. pp. 35–41. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moghadasi M, Allahyari H, Saboori A, Golpayegani AZ. Life table and predation capacity of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) on rose. J Agric Sci Technol 2016;18: 1279–1288. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kristensen TN, Pedersen KS, Vermeulen CJ, Loeschcke V. Research on inbreeding in the `omic`era. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25: 44–52. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fox CW, Reed DH. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 2011;65: 246–258. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01108.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res. 1999;74: 165–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Swindell WR, Bouzat JL. Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment. Evolution 2006;60: 1014–1022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Walzer A, Schausberger P. Sex-specific developmental plasticity of generalist and specialist predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in response to food stress. Biol J Linn Soc. 2011;102: 650–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.De Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. A revised catalogue of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 2004;434: 1–494. [Google Scholar]
- 44.McMurtry JA, Scriven GT. Insectary production of phytoseiid mites. J Econ Entomol 1965;58: 282–284. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schausberger P, Patino-Ruiz JD, Osakabe M, Murata Y, Sugimoto N, Uesugi R et al. Ultimate drivers and proximate correlates of polyandry in predatory mites. PloS ONE 2016;11: e0154355 10.1371/journal.pone.0154355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schausberger P. Inter-and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 1997;21: 131–150. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nelson RM, Greeff JM. Sex ratio dependent dispersal when sex ratios vary between patches. J Theor Biol. 2011;290: 81–87. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.08.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wright S. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat. 1922;56: 330–338. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wright S, editor. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: The Theory of Gene Frequencies v. 2 Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1969. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liautard C, Sundström F. Estimation of individual level of inbreeding using relatedness measures in haplodiploids. Insect Soc. 2005;52: 323–326. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alstad DN. Basic Populus Models of Ecology Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wimmer D, Hoffmann D, Schausberger P. Prey suitability of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, and onion thrips, Thrips tabaci, for the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii. Biocont Sci Technol. 2008;18: 533–542. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized Estimating Equations, 2nd edition Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Galazzi D, Nicoli G. Comparative study of strains of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina Phytoseiidae). II. Influence of mass-rearing on population growth. Boll Entomol "Guido Grandi" Univ Bologna. 1996;50: 243–252. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations?: predictions from Drosophila. J Evol Biol. 2000;13: 502–514. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Szücs M, Melbourne BA, Tuff T, Hufbauer RA. The roles of demography and genetics in the early stages of colonization. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci. 2014;281: 20141073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Revynthi AM, Egas M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW. Prey exploitation and dispersal strategies vary among natural populations of a predatory mite. Ecol Evol. 2018;8: 10384–10394. 10.1002/ece3.4446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 1998;392: 491–494. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hildner KK, Soule ME, Min M-S, Foran DR. The relationship between genetic variability and growth rate among populations of the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae. Conserv Genet. 2003;4: 233–240. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Agashe D. The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. Am Nat. 2009;174: 255–267. 10.1086/600085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Agashe D, Falk JJ, Bolnick DI. Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution 2011;65: 2481–2491. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01307.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Drake JM. Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird. Biol Lett. 2006;2: 304–307. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wagner NK, Ochocki BM, Crawford KM, Compagnoni A, Miller TEX. Genetic mixture of multiple source populations accelerates invasive range expansion. J Anim Ecol. 2017;86: 21–34. 10.1111/1365-2656.12567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fauvergue X, Fercken E, Malausa T, Hufbauer RA. The biology of small, introduced populations, with special reference to biological control. Evol Appl. 2012;5: 424–443. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00272.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.




