Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Apr 11;8(15):e01642-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01642-18

Draft Genome Sequences of 12 Isolates from 3 Fusarium Species Recovered from Moldy Peanuts

Solomon T Gebru a, Mark K Mammel a, Jayanthi Gangiredla a, Vasiliki H Tournas b, Keith A Lampel a,*, Carmen Tartera a,
Editor: Vincent Brunoc
PMCID: PMC6460040  PMID: 30975817

In this report, we announce the sequences of six genomes of Fusarium proliferatum (isolates MOD1-FUNGI8, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -19), four genomes of Fusarium oxysporum (MOD1-FUNGI9, -10, -11, and -16), and two genomes of the Fusarium incarnatum-Fusarium equiseti species complex (MOD1-FUNGI17 and MOD1-FUNGI18) isolated from moldy peanuts from the Washington, DC, area.

ABSTRACT

In this report, we announce the sequences of six genomes of Fusarium proliferatum (isolates MOD1-FUNGI8, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -19), four genomes of Fusarium oxysporum (MOD1-FUNGI9, -10, -11, and -16), and two genomes of the Fusarium incarnatum-Fusarium equiseti species complex (MOD1-FUNGI17 and MOD1-FUNGI18) isolated from moldy peanuts from the Washington, DC, area.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Foods of plant origin, such as tree nuts, are known to foster the growth of various microorganisms, including toxigenic and pathogenic fungi (1). Members of the genera Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium are known to be the major mycotoxin-producing fungi (24). According to past research, peanuts and tree nuts, such as walnuts, pistachios, and pecans, are frequently colonized by these molds (1). Fusarium species are among the most prevalent toxin-producing fungi and plant pathogens, causing crown rot, head blight, and scab on cereal grains and vascular wilts on a wide range of horticultural crops (510). In addition, fusaria produce diverse mycotoxins, including trichothecenes (T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, deoxynivalenol, and nivalenol), zearalenone, and fumonisins, and other toxic secondary metabolites (3, 4). These toxins pose a threat to food safety and human health if they enter the food chain. Therefore, comparative genomics provides a means to accurately catalog their pathogenic potential.

In-shell peanuts were tested for the presence of live fungi by direct plating onto dichloran glycerol (DG18) agar as described in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM), Chapter 18 (11). Colonies were randomly selected (usually one or two of each morphological type were picked). The isolates were microscopically examined and identified to the genus level using conventional culture methods and taxonomical keys (12). The recovered molds were purified by subculturing on potato dextrose agar (BD Difco, Detroit, MI) and incubated at 25°C for 5 days. Mycelium for DNA extraction was obtained by culturing each strain in potato dextrose broth at 25°C for 48 h. Subsequently, the DNA was extracted with the AllPrep fungal DNA/RNA/protein kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and purity of the genomic DNA (gDNA) was assessed spectrophotometrically using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE), and quality control was performed using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Burlington, Canada). Whole-genome sequencing was performed using a Nextera XT DNA library prep kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) with 2 × 150-bp paired-end sequencing on an Illumina NextSeq sequencer with a NextSeq 500/550 midoutput reagent cartridge V2 (n = 8). Fast QC (Q score, >30) was used to check the raw sequence data for quality control, followed by de novo assembly using SPAdes 3.8.2 (Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia) (13). The draft genomes comprised between 325 and 2,370 contigs, with an N50 value that ranged from 63,924 to 262,090 bp, and the depth of coverage ranged from 23× to 110× (Table 1). The genome sizes for Fusarium proliferatum ranged from 43,155,960 to 43,337,992 bp, for Fusarium oxysporum from 44,448,977 to 47,450,651 bp, and for Fusarium incarnatum-Fusarium equiseti species complex (FIESC 29) from 38,253,301 to 38,264,798 bp (Table 1). A custom kmer analysis of the reads determined an initial identification of the species that was confirmed by matching the TEF1 gene sequences from the assemblies against the Fusarium multilocus sequence type (MLST) database (14).

TABLE 1.

Fusarium species statistics data

BioSample accession no. Isolate Species GenBank accession no. SRA accession no. No. of contigs No. of reads Genome size (bp) N50 value Avg coverage (×) G+C content (%)
SAMN10078280 MOD1-FUNGI8 F. proliferatum RBJG00000000 SRR7889975 1,159 33,254,726 43,155,960 68,427 27 48.8
SAMN10078281 MOD1-FUNGI9 F. oxysporum RBCG00000000 SRR7889959 2,370 37,245,070 47,450,651 63,924 28 48.3
SAMN10078282 MOD1-FUNGI10 F. oxysporum RBJF00000000 SRR7889971 1,950 37,008,864 46,252,701 66,395 28 48.4
SAMN10078283 MOD1-FUNGI11 F. oxysporum RBCF00000000 SRR7889970 1,377 55,555,690 46,282,089 176,916 82 48.4
SAMN10078284 MOD1-FUNGI12 F. proliferatum RBCE00000000 SRR7889969 562 50,008,512 43,124,502 172,812 79 48.8
SAMN10078285 MOD1-FUNGI13 F. proliferatum RBCD00000000 SRR7889968 1,006 33,134,216 43,139,311 84,221 40 48.8
SAMN10078286 MOD1-FUNGI14 F. proliferatum RBCC00000000 SRR7889967 563 28,820,800 43,147,616 181,851 44 48.8
SAMN10078287 MOD1-FUNGI15 F. proliferatum RBCB00000000 SRR7889966 578 71,676,280 43,337,992 253,187 106 48.7
SAMN10078288 MOD1-FUNGI16 F. oxysporum RBCA00000000 SRR7889965 944 73,866,756 44,448,977 262,090 110 48.3
SAMN10078289 MOD1-FUNGI17 Fusarium sp. FIESC_29 RBJE00000000 SRR7889964 325 37,761,252 38,264,798 228,787 23 48.5
SAMN10078290 MOD1-FUNGI18 Fusaruim sp. FIESC_ 29 RBBZ00000000 SRR7889963 340 46,941,284 38,253,301 220,485 26 48.5
SAMN10078291 MOD1-FUNGI19 F. proliferatum RBBY00000000 SRR7889962 449 54,664,676 43,132,928 195,358 50 48.8

Data availability.

The draft genome assemblies were deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA482816, and the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and SRA accession numbers for the genomes are listed in the Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported by the U.S. FDA, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Applied Research and Safety Assessment. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or the U.S. Government. Reference to any commercial materials, equipment, or process does not in any way constitute approval, endorsement, or recommendation by the FDA.

We thank Kerry O’Donnell at USDA-ARS for assistance in using the Fusarium MLST scheme. We also thank Amit Mukherjee of the Division of Molecular Biology for his critical editing and comments.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tournas VH, Niazi NS, Kohn JS. 2015. Fungal presence in selected tree nuts and dried fruits. Microbiol Insights 8:1–6. doi: 10.4137/MBI.S24308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Villani A, Moretti A, De Saeger S, Han Z, Di Mavungu JD, Soares CMG, Proctor RH, Venâncio A, Lima N, Stea G, Paciolla C, Logrieco AF, Susca A. 2016. A polyphasic approach for characterization of a collection of cereal isolates of the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex. Int J Food Microbiol 234:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wagacha JM, Muthomi JW. 2008. Mycotoxin problem in Africa: current status, implications to food safety and health and possible management strategies. Int J Food Microbiol 124:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Darwish WS, Ikenaka Y, Nakayama SM, Ishizuka M. 2014. An overview on mycotoxin contamination of foods in Africa. J Vet Med Sci 76:789–797. doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Booth C. 1971. The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth Mycology Institute, Kew, Surrey, England. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Latiffah Z, Nur H, Baharuddin S, Maziah Z. 2009. Morphological and RAPD analysis of Fusarium species associated with root and stem rot of Dendrobium orchid in Northern Peninsula Malaysia. HAYATI J Biosci 16:64–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chang M, Hyun IK, Lee YH, Lee DH. 1998. Leaf spot of Cymbidium hybrida caused by Fusarium proliferatum. Korean J Plant Pathol 14:664–667. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ichikawa K, Aoki T. 2000. New leaf spot disease of Cymbidium species caused by Fusarium subglutinans and Fusarium proliferatum. J Gen Plant Pathol 66:213–218. doi: 10.1007/PL00012948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim WG, Lee BD, Cho WD, Sung JM. 2002. Occurrence of dry rot on Cymbidium orchids caused by Fusarium spp. in Korea. Korean J Plant Pathol 18:156–160. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.2002.18.3.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nelson PE, Dignani MC, Anaissie EJ. 1994. Taxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin Microbiol Rev 7:479–504. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.4.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tournas V, Stack ME, Mislivec PB, Koch HA, Bandler R. 2001. Chapter 18, Yeasts, molds and mycotoxins In Bacteriological analytical manual (BAM). Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD: https://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/laboratorymethods/ucm2006949.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nelson PE, Toussoun TA, Marasas WFO. 1983. Fusarium species: an illustrated manual for identification. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Geiser DM, Jiménez-Gasco M, Kang S, Makalowska I, Veeraraghavan N, Ward TJ, Zhang N, Kuldau GA, O'Donnell K. 2004. FUSARIUM-ID v. 1.0: a DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:473–479. doi: 10.1023/B:EJPP.0000032386.75915.a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft genome assemblies were deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA482816, and the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and SRA accession numbers for the genomes are listed in the Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES