Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Apr 11;8(15):e01713-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01713-18

Genome Sequence of a California Isolate of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Race 3, a Fungus Causing Wilt Disease on Tomato

Peter M Henry a, Michelle Stueven a, Sampson Li a, Eugene M Miyao b, Thomas R Gordon a, R Michael Davis a,b, Hung K Doan a,
Editor: Vincent Brunoc
PMCID: PMC6460042  PMID: 30975819

Fusarium wilt of tomato, caused by the soilborne fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, is an increasingly important disease of tomato. This paper reports the high-quality draft genome assembly of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolate D11 (race 3), which consists of 39 scaffolds with 57,281,978 bp (GC content, 47.5%), an N50 of 4,408,267 bp, a mean read coverage of 99.8×, and 17,682 predicted genes.

ABSTRACT

Fusarium wilt of tomato, caused by the soilborne fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, is an increasingly important disease of tomato. This paper reports the high-quality draft genome assembly of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolate D11 (race 3), which consists of 39 scaffolds with 57,281,978 bp (GC content, 47.5%), an N50 of 4,408,267 bp, a mean read coverage of 99.8×, and 17,682 predicted genes.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Fusarium wilt of tomato, caused by the soilborne fungus Fusarium oxysporum Schlechtend.:Fr f. sp. lycopersici (Sacc.) W. C. Snyder & H. N. Hans., is a widespread and destructive disease in major tomato-growing regions worldwide (1). F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici comprises three races, based on pathogenicity to tomato cultivars carrying monogenic resistance genes (1, 2). We generated a high-quality draft genome assembly for F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 3 from California to serve as a reference for future studies of this pathogen. The isolate, D11, was obtained from a symptomatic plant in a commercial processing tomato field near Woodland, California, on 7 September 2010. D11 was isolated as a single spore from growth emerging from tissue cultured on Komada’s medium (3) and was found to be somatically compatible with tester strains representative of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici VCG 0030 by the method described by Henry et al. (4). Race differentiation was confirmed by pathogenicity tests with the following tomato cultivars: Early Pak 7 (susceptible), VFN-8 (resistant to race 1), Walter (resistant to races 1 and 2), and CXD 282 (resistant to races 1, 2, and 3).

DNA was extracted from lyophilized conidia harvested from potato dextrose agar per Kaur et al. (5). Pacific Biosciences SMRTbell libraries were prepared at the University of California at Davis DNA Technologies Core, size selected for fragments larger than 15 kbp (BluePippin system), and sequenced with five single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cells on a PacBio RS II sequencing platform with P6C4 chemistry. A total of 396,897 reads (N50, 23,089 bp) passed quality filtering with polymerase read qualities above 0.80 and read lengths greater than 1,000 bp. These reads were assembled by HGAP3 (SMRT Analysis version 2.3.0) into 39 contigs with an N50 value of 4,408,267 bp and a mean read coverage of 99.8× (6). BUSCO (version 2.0) was used to assess completeness of the assembly as follows: 96.9% of expected complete, single-copy genes were found in the D11 assembly, which compared favorably to 94.8% identified in the isolate 4287 reference assembly (7). “Unitig_17” was identified as the mitochondrial genome sequence by comparison with a reference mitochondrial sequence (GenBank accession no. LT906324). Geneious (version R11.1) was used to self-align and circularize this sequence, starting with the “ATG” start codon from the nad2 gene. CodingQuarry (8) was trained for gene prediction by mapping transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) reads (9) from the Spanish F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 4287 to its corresponding reference assembly. With these training models, 17,682 genes were predicted in the D11 genome. Contigs were aligned to the F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 4287 assembly to identify conserved chromosomes with progressiveMauve (10). Analysis of synteny showed multiple rearrangements in pathogenicity chromosome 14. A single G-to-C transversion at position 137 of the SIX3 (Avr2) gene was observed and is likely responsible for the lack of recognition by the I-2 resistance gene of tomato (11).

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. RBXW00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, RBXW01000000. Raw reads are available at NCBI GenBank under the accession no. SRR7892102.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the California Tomato Research Institute.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cai G, Gale LR, Schneider RW, Kistler HC, Davis RM, Elias KS, Miyao EM. 2003. Origin of race 3 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici at a single site in California. Phytopathology 93:1014–1022. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.8.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McGovern RJ. 2015. Management of tomato diseases caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Crop Prot 73:78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Komada H. 1975. Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soils. Rev Plant Prot Res 8:114–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Henry PM, Kirkpatrick SC, Islas CM, Pastrana AM, Yoshisato JA, Koike ST, Daugovish O, Gordon TR. 2017. The population of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae, cause of Fusarium wilt of strawberry, in California. Plant Dis 101:550–556. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-16-1058-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kaur S, Pham QA, Epstein L. 2017. High quality DNA from Fusarium oxysporum conidia suitable for library preparation and long read sequencing with PacBio. Protocols.io. doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.inycdfw. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Testa AC, Hane JK, Ellwood SR, Oliver RP. 2015. CodingQuarry: highly accurate hidden Markov model gene prediction in fungal genomes using RNA-seq transcripts. BMC Genomics 16:170. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1344-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Dam P, Fokkens L, Schmidt SM, Linmans JHJ, Kistler HC, Ma L-J, Rep M. 2016. Effector profiles distinguish formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum. Environ Microbiol 18:4087–4102. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss, and rearrangement. PLoS One 5: e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lievens B, Houterman PM, Rep M. 2009. Effector gene screening allows unambiguous identification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici races and discrimination from other formae speciales. FEMS Microbiol Lett 300:201–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. RBXW00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, RBXW01000000. Raw reads are available at NCBI GenBank under the accession no. SRR7892102.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES