Statistical analysis plan for the ‘Rapid Intervention with Glyceryl trinitrate in Hypertensive stroke Trial-2 (RIGHT-2)’

Short abstract

Rationale:

Glyceryl trinitrate, a nitric oxide donor, is a candidate treatment for acute stroke; it lowers blood pressure, does not alter cerebral blood flow or platelet function and is neuroprotective in experimental stroke. The ongoing rapid intervention with glyceryl trinitrate in hypertensive stroke trial-2 trial aims to assess the safety and efficacy of paramedic-delivered glyceryl trinitrate in patients with ultra-acute stroke.

Aims and design: The rapid intervention with glyceryl trinitrate in hypertensive stroke trial-2 trial is a multicentre UK-based prospective randomised sham-controlled outcome-blinded parallel-group trial in patients with presumed stroke who present to the ambulance service following a 999 emergency call. The primary outcome is the modified Rankin scale measured by central telephone follow-up at 90 days.

Results

This paper describes the statistical analysis plan for the rapid intervention with glyceryl trinitrate in hypertensive stroke trial-2 trial and was developed prior to unblinding to treatment allocation. The statistical analysis plan includes details of methods for analyses and unpopulated tables and figures to be included in the primary and other secondary publications.

Discussion

Statistical analysis plan details what analyses will be done prior to unblinding to treatment allocation to avoid bias in the findings. Rapid intervention with glyceryl trinitrate in hypertensive stroke trial-2 trial will determine whether glyceryl trinitrate administered ultra-acutely can improve outcome after stroke. The rapid intervention with glyceryl trinitrate in hypertensive stroke trial-2 trial is registered as ISRCTN26986053.

Introduction

Most effective interventions for acute stroke are time limited so that treatment has to be commenced within 4.5 hours (intravenous alteplase) or 6 h (mechanical thrombectomy) of ictus.^1–3 Within these time windows, efficacy is time-dependent with the greatest benefit occurring when treatment starts very early after stroke onset.^2,3 These interventions are only appropriate for ischaemic stroke and require prior brain scanning to exclude intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Further, they are both expensive. There are no definitive treatments for patients with spontaneous ICH although intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering in the hyperacute period may be effective, as is recommended in guidelines.^4–6

One approach to accelerating the onset of treatment is to deliver interventions before hospital admission with recruitment at the emergency scene or in the ambulance. Several pilot trials have assessed a variety of interventions including magnesium, insulin, remote ischaemic conditioning and BP lowering.^7–15 A common feature of these treatments is that prior brain imaging is not required, although successful studies of mounting a computerised tomography (CT) scanner and point-of-care laboratory in an ambulance have also been performed in patients with suspected stroke.¹⁶ Recently, the Field Administration of Stroke Therapy - Magnesium (FAST-Mag) trial showed that it was feasible to deliver a large phase III trial in the pre-hospital arena, at least in the US emergency care system and with medical support and consent via telephone.¹⁷

Nitric oxide donors

In view of their multi-modal effects, nitric oxide (NO) donors are candidate treatments for acute stroke.^18,19 NO is a mixed arterial and venous vasodilator, modulates vascular and neuronal function and inhibits apoptosis. As such, it is a key neurovascular modulator and yet circulating levels are low in acute stroke.²⁰ Preclinical stroke studies have shown that supplementation of NO with donors reduces stroke lesion size if given very early in a variety of stroke models and improves regional cerebral blood flow in permanent models of stroke.²¹ Four small clinical studies of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a NO donor that can be administered transdermally, in patients with recent stroke found that it reduced BP (an independent risk factor for a poor outcome^22–24) and pulse pressure; had no effects on middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity, cerebral blood flow or intracranial pressure; did not alter platelet activity (so GTN can be given in ICH); improved vascular compliance and had no apparent safety concerns.^14,25–27 In the last of these pilot studies (Rapid Intervention with GTN in Hypertensive stroke Trial (RIGHT)), GTN was administered by paramedics in the ambulance within 4 hours of stroke onset and significantly improved functional outcome.¹⁴ The large Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) trial (4011 patients recruited from 173 sites in 23 countries) found that GTN was safe to administer but did not modify outcome if given within 48 hours of stroke onset;²⁸ however, functional outcome was improved in those patients recruited within 6 h (a pre-specified subgroup),^28,29 this result mirroring that seen in RIGHT.³⁰

RIGHT-2 trial

On the basis of pre-clinical data for NO donors and clinical data showing feasibility, tolerability and safety of GTN and the potential for efficacy if given very early after stroke, the RIGHT-2 trial is assessing the safety and efficacy of GTN when administered by paramedics in the pre-hospital environment to 850 patients from across the UK, as detailed in the trial’s published protocol.³¹ The primary outcome and analysis is a comparison of the modified Rankin scale between treatment groups assessed using ordinal logistic regression. The present paper details the statistical analysis plan (SAP), as given in the accompanying supplement. This information is presented blinded to treatment assignment and prior to locking of the trial database so that analyses are not data-driven or selectively reported.³² Following on from the ENOS trial and its protocol,³³ this SAP includes not just information on the primary publication (GTN vs. sham) but also describes information on additional planned publications, including baseline characteristics, and a series of secondary publications.

Data sharing

Once completed, data from RIGHT-2 will be added to summary and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in acute stroke, first those focusing on NO donors^30,34 and then of BP lowering (through the ‘Blood pressure in Acute Stroke Collaboration’, BASC).^35,36 IPD will be made available to the ‘Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive’ (VISTA)³⁷ and subsequently over the web, as with the International Stroke Trial.³⁸ Similarly, anonymised baseline and on-treatment neuroimaging data will be published.³⁹

Supporting information

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article with the accompanying Supplement (RIGHT-2 SAP Supplement).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (grant number CS/14/4/30972).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects for the study.

Ethical approval

The ethics committee of Nottingham2REC approved this study (REC number: 15/EM/0055).

Trial registration: Trial is registered ISRCTN 26986053.

Guarantor

Philip M Bath

Contributorship

PB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.