Skip to main content
Iranian Biomedical Journal logoLink to Iranian Biomedical Journal
. 2019 Jul;23(4):287–296. doi: 10.29252/.23.4.287

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Rhopalurus junceus Scorpion Venom in Tumor-Bearing Mice after Intravenous and Oral Administration

Alexis Díaz-García 1,*, Gilmara Pimentel González 2, Tais Basaco Bernabeu 2, Juan C Rodríguez Aurrecochea 3, Hermis Rodríguez Sánchez 4, Iraida Sánchez Monzón 2, Maikel Hernández Gómez 2, Caridad Rodríguez Torres 1, Maria Regla Rodríguez Capote 1, Irania Guevara Orellanes 1
PMCID: PMC6462292  PMID: 30954030

Abstract

Introduction:

Rhopalurus junceus scorpion venom has shown potential for anticancer treatment. However, there are no scientific evidence about venom pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution (BD) in tumor-bearing mice.

Methods:

131I-labeled venom was administrated by intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) routes at the single dose of 12.5 mg/kg. Mice were sacrificed and blood samples, major organs, and tumor were taken at 10, 20, 40, 90, 180, 300, 480, and 1440 min.

Results:

For IV route, maximum peak concentration (Cmax), elimination half-lives, total body clearance (CL), distribution volume (Vd), mean residence time (MRT), and area under curve (AUC) were 21.77 ± 2.45 %Dosis·h/mL, 12.65 ± 2.1 h, 4.59 ± 0.23 mL/h, 83.80 ± 12 mL, 12.49 ± 2.71 h, and 21.77 ± 2.45 %Dosis·h/mL, respectively. For PO route, they were 0.60 ± 0.07 %Dosis·h/mL, 9.33 ± 1.35 h, 36.94 ± 4.01 mL/h, 497.33 ± 30 mL, 12.40 ± 1.87 h, and 6.89 ± 1.18 %Dosis·h/mL, respectively. PK parameters (Cmax, CL, Vd, and AUC) showed significant differences between IV and PO routes. Bioavailability was 31.6 ± 4% for PO dose. Kidney, stomach, liver, and lung for IV and stomach, kidney, spleen, and lung for PO routes showed the major uptakes for 131I-labeled venom. In tumor tissue, after the maximum uptake for both routes, there was a consistent behavior of radioactivity respect to the major organs during the first 480 min.

Conclusion:

The PK and BD of R. junceus venom in mice depend on the administration route. These data represent a starting point for future experiments with this scorpion venom in experimental models of cancer.

Keywords: Intravenous, Mice, Oral administration, Radioactivity, Scorpion venom

INTRODUCTION

Scorpion venom is a mixture of different types of biologically active components. The biochemical characterization of scorpion venom has shown that it is composed of peptides and proteins of 60–70 amino acid residues, with cross-linked disulfide bridges acting mainly on ion channels present in cells from insects, crustaceous, and mammals[1,2]. These toxic peptides, acting alone or synergistically, are mainly responsible for the biological activity of scorpion venom either for defense from predators or capture the prey.

The therapeutic potential of scorpion venom comes from an increasing number of scientific records on antimicrobial, analgesic and antitumor effect of the whole venom and/or its purified compounds[3]. Experimental preclinical data has set the potential of scorpion venom in anticancer therapy as a result of the apoptotic and anti-proliferative properties of the venom along with the inhibitory effects on cancer progression. The anticancer property of scorpion venom has been studied in different types of cancers, including glioma, neuroblastoma, leukemia, and lymphoma, as well as breast, lung, and prostate cancers [3-5].

Rhopalurus junceus is a Cuban endemic scorpion extensively used in traditional medicine as pain relief, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor. Venom from this scorpion has recently been considered as an anticancer candidate due to its selective cytotoxic effect against epithelial cancer cell lines[6]. Additional studies from our group have reported that R. junceus scorpion venom is able to induce apoptotic cell death against cervical[6] and breast cancer[7] cell lines in in vitro experiments. In spite of these results, there is no scientific evidence on the behavior of R. junceus venom in tumor-bearing animals, their tissue distribution, and time-kinetic relationship. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to obtain evidence regarding the pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution (BD) of R. junceus venom in tumor-bearing mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Scorpion venom source

Venom was obtained from scorpions kept alive in the laboratories belonging to the Entrepreneurial Group of Biopharmaceuticals and Chemistries Productions (LABIOFAM), located in Havana, Cuba. Venom was extracted by electrical stimulation, dissolved in distilled water and centrifuged at 369 ×g for 15 min. The protein concentration in supernatant was calculated by Lowry’s method[8].

Materials and reagents

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), L-glutamine, gentamicin, phosphate buffer, trichlroacetic acid, chloramine-T, and sodium metabisulfite were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was procured from Hyclone Laboratories Inc., USA. 131I-Na was obtained from Center of Isotopes (Havana, Cuba).

Cells and animals

The mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cell line, F3II, was kindly provided by The Center of Molecular Immunology (Cuba). The cells were cultured and maintained in DMEM, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM of L-glutamine, and 80 μg/mL of gentamicin. Eight- to ten-week-old male BALB/c mice with the average weight of 20 ± 2 g were obtained from the National Center for Laboratory Animal Breeding (CENPALAB, Havana, Cuba). Mice were housed in controlled temperature and humidity. Food and water were administered ad libitum. The experimental procedure using animals was approved by the Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Protocol 2013/3) and performed in accordance with the EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. For PK and BD studies, the mice were implanted with 2 × 105/100 µl F3II m urine breast cancer cells by subcutaneous injection in the right flank. When tumor size became ~150 mm3, the animals were injected with a single intravenous (IV) or an oral (PO) dose.

Radioiodination of the venom

Labeling of scorpion venom was carried out by the chloramin-T method[9]. This method specifically iodinates tyrosine residues in proteins, forming a stable covalent protein-131I bond. Briefly, 11 mg of scorpion venom was mixed with 400 µl of 0.5 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. Additionally, 400 μL of 131I-Na (4 mCi) and 100 µl of chloramine-T (6 mg/mL) were added to the mix sequentially. Finally, 150 µl of sodium metabisulfite (12 mg/mL) was added to stop the reaction. The pH control was achieved all the time by using buffers solution.

Stability and efficiency studies of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom

Stability of the 131I-labeled R. junceus venom was determined in vitro in mice serum, and normal saline was used as solvent for ascending thin layer chromatography (TLC) technique. The 131I-labeled R. junceus venom was mixed with freshly collected mice serum (1:9) and incubated in 1.5 ml-Eppendorf tubes at room temperature during 24 h. The samples were taken away at regular intervals up to 24 h, and then TLC was carried out. The TLC strips were counted for radioactivity in gamma ray spectrometer, and percentage labeling efficiency was calculated. Whatman paper descending chromatography was employed to monitor the labeling efficiency.

Determination of PK parameters of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom

PK studies analyze two routes of administration, IV and PO. Forty mice were selected for each route of administration in tumor-bearing mice. The animals were separated into eight groups of five animals each and received a single-dose (12.5 mg/kg) of 131I-labeled-R. junceus venom with 3.67 MBq (400 µCi/mg) in a 100-µL volume. Mice were sacrificed at 10, 20, 40, 90, 180, 300, 480, and 1440 min following IV or PO administration. The time course of venom concentration in blood was followed by radioactivity. Whole blood samples were collected in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes for the measurement of radioactivity using a γ-scintillation counter CAPRAC-R (Capintec Inc, USA). The blood samples were centrifuged at 532 ×g at 4 °C for 10 min, and serum was obtained. The concentration of 131I-labeled-R. junceus venom in the serum was determined after trichlroacetic acid precipitation. In brief, serum samples (100 μL) from each animal were diluted separately in 400 μL of bovine serum albumin and then precipitated with 500 μL of 20% (v/v) trichlroacetic acid. Samples were incubated at 4 ºC for 30 min, and mixtures were centrifuged at 369 ×g at 4 °C for 15 min. Radioactivity in the pellet was measured in the γ-counter. Counts were corrected for background radiation, physical decay, and spillover of 131I counts. The results were presented as the percentage of injected dose (%ID)/ml blood vs. time. The data were fitted to non-compartment model for both routes of administration by using nonlinear regression in Gauss-Newton method in the computer software WinNonlin 5.0 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA). Non compartment equations were used to calculate various PK parameters, such as elimination half-life (T½), total body clearance (CL), distribution volume (Vd), area under curve (AUC), maximum peak concentration (Cmax), time to reach the Cmax (tmax), and mean residence time (MRT). Bioavailability (F) of the PO dose of 131I-labeled-R. junceus venom respect to IV administration was calculated according to the formula F = AUCPO/AUCIV

Biodistribution of 131I-labeled-venom

For BD studies, animal groups separated as described above were sacrificed and dissected at the time selected previously, after 131I-labeled-R. junceus venom administration by IV and PO routes. The whole blood, different organs such as heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, stomach, large intestine, small intestine, muscle, bone and tumor were removed, washed with normal saline and blotted. They were then weighed, and the corresponding radioactivity was measured using the γ-scintillation counter. The uptake of radioiodination in tissues and organs was expressed as %ID per gram of tissue (%ID/g).

Production of specific anti-R. junceus IgG poly-clonal antibodies

Adult female New Zealand white rabbits (1.8–2 kg) were immunized by injecting subcutaneously one dose of 500 μg scorpion venom emulsified in 1 mL of complete Freund’s adjuvant. Three additional booster injections at 10-day intervals were performed with similar doses emulsified in 1 mL of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant. Ten days after the last injection, rabbits were bled by cardiac puncture. Serum was obtained, and anti-R. junceus IgG antibodies were purified by using affinity chromatography with a Sepharose 4B-CNBr-activated column as previously described[10].

Simulated gastric juice (SGJ)

SGJ was based on studies carried out by Fu et al.[11] with slight modifications. Briefly, a hydrochloric acid solution was prepared, which included sodium chloride (2 mg/mL) and porcine pepsin (3.2 mg/mL) at pH 1.2. R. junceus scorpion venom was added at the final concentration of 1 mg/mL, and the final volume was 500 μL. In the experiment, a control solution without pepsin was included, and the incubation period was 20 min at 37ºC.

Detection of R. junceus venom proteins in SGJ

After incubation period, SDS-PAGE analysis was performed under non-reducing conditions as previously described[12]. In brief, 50 μL of control and hydrochloric acid-treated samples was separated on a 16% SDS-PAGE gel. The separated bands were subsequently transferred to PVDF membranes, blocked with 5% skim milk and incubated with primary (anti-R. junceus IgG antibodies) and secondary anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-linked IgG antibody sequentially. Finally, bands recognized by antibodies were visualized by 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine staining.

Statistical analysis

For statistics, we used the GraphPad Prism version 5.01 for Windows, (GraphPad Software, San Diego California, USA). All values were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Comparison of PK parameters between IV and PO routes was analyzed by the two-tailed unpaired or paired student’s t-test. For all the analyses, p < 0.05 was considered statistically as significant.

RESULTS

To determine the PK and BD properties in vivo, R. junceus scorpion venom was radiolabeled with iodine-131. The radioiodination method achieved more than 95.2 ± 0.3% of labeling. The stability in in vitro assay showed that 131I-labeled scorpion venom was stable in mice serum at least until 24 h. Because the labeling efficiencies exceeded 95%, no further purification was performed for animal studies. Measurements of radioactivity in whole blood and serum showed differences, with higher radioactivity measurements in serum respect to whole blood (data not shown). The mean radioactivity (% ID/ml) in serum versus time curve after IV administration in tumor-bearing mice is shown in Figure 1A, which shows a fast distribution phase to tissue from the beginning until 40 min and a second slow elimination phase. The PO administration showed a typical curve with an initial absorption phase lasting around 3 h, a rapid distribution phase taking two hours and a third slow elimination phase until the end of measurements (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Serum concentration-time profile of 131I-labeled R. junceus scorpion venom after (A) intravenous and (B) oral administration of 12.5 mg/kg in F3II tumor-bearing mice. Data are reported as means ± SD (n = 5).

The PK parameters from both routes of administration are shown in Table 1. For IV route, Cmax (27.647 ± 6.345 %Dosis/mL) showed significant difference (p < 0.05) respect to PO route Cmax (0.60 ± 0.07 %Dosis/mL), which was 46 times higher. Meanwhile, AUC from IV and PO routes showed significant differences (p < 0.05); the AUCIV/AUCPO value was 3.1 times (Table 1). The PO elimination rate (36.94 ± 4.01 mL/h) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) respect to IV route (4.59 ± 0.23 mL/h). The apparent volume in PO route also displayed significant differences (p < 0.05) respect to IV route (Table 1). In both routes of administration, the MRT was relatively similar (Table 1). At the same time, the T½ in IV was 12.65 ± 2.1 h, but that of PO was 9.33 ± 1.35 h, which represent only 1.33 times higher. The PO bioavailability of scorpion venom was 31.6 ± 4%.

Table 1.

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of 131I-labeled-R. junceus venom after intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) administration at 12.5 mg/kg of scorpion venom in tumor-bearing mice.

PK parameters IV PO
AUC (%Dosis·h/mL) 21.77 ± 2.45* 6.89 ± 1.18
CL (mL/h) 4.59 ± 0.23* 36.94 ± 4.01
Vd (mL) 83.80 ± 12.00* 497.33 ± 30.00
T½ (h) 12.65 ± 2.10 9.33 ± 1.35
MRT (h) 12.49 ± 2.71 12.40 ± 1.87
Cmax (%Dosis/mL) 27.64 ± 6.34* 0.60 ± 0.07
T max (h) 0.00 3.00 ± 0.30

Significant differences

*

p < 0.05 respect to PO route

The radioactivity of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom in tissue distribution from IV and PO routes was determined at different time intervals. The BD of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom in the major organs after IV injection is shown in Table 2. During the first two hours, a relatively high uptake of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom was observed in those organs that are well vascularized and involved in biotransformation and excretion processes, such as stomach, kidney, liver, and lung (Table 2). From IV route, the radioactivity revealed that 10 min after the radioconjugate injection, the kidney contained the highest radioactivity with 49.94 ± 7.69 %ID/g. Besides, lung was the second organ with 29.01 ± 11.98 %ID/g, and stomach was the third with 15.96 ± 6.37 %ID/g, both at 1.5 h. Finally, liver showed 6.60 ± 0.76 %ID/g at 10 min after venom injection (Table 2). Tumor tissue demonstrated a maximum peak of 3.11 ± 0.40 %ID/g at 10 min after IV injection (Table 2). In all four organs, after radioactivity reached the maximum, the values decreased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2). Only in tumor tissue, after the maximum uptake, there was a consistent behavior in terms of radioactivity (~2 %ID/g), during the first 480 min (Fig. 2)

Table 2.

Radioactivity in organs after intravenous injection of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom in F3II tumor-bearing mice

Organ 10 min 20 min 40 min 90 min 180 min 300 min 480 min 1440 min
Blood 5.09 ± 1.00 3.54 ± 0.63 3.29 ± 0.51 3.83 ± 0.12 2.34 ± 0.92 2.77 ± 0.44 1.77 ± 0.34 0.13 ± 0.04
Heart 2.71 ± 0.61 2.29 ± 0.84 2.07 ± 0.45 2.48 ± 0.68 1.46 ± 0.50 1.36 ± 0.29 0.29 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.00
Lung 6.93 ± 2.47 26.62 ± 11.06 14.84 ± 8.75 29.01 ± 11.98 17.95 ± 9.72 2.96 ± 0.08 2.22 ± 0.63 2.23 ± 1.17
Liver 6.60 ± 0.76 2.36 ± 0.80 1.91 ± 0.38 2.97 ± 0.46 2.37 ± 0.52 2.65 ± 1.63 1.26 ± 0.35 0.43 ± 0.08
Spleen 2.53 ± 0.10 2.03 ± 0.69 1.74 ± 0.38 2.89 ± 0.37 2.42 ± 0.78 1.46 ± 0.45 0.50 ± 0.09 0.63 ± 0.03
Kidney 49.94 ± 7.69 33.82 ± 9.42 15.04 ± 1.66 7.11 ± 2.20 3.84 ± 1.59 2.81 ± 0.68 0.81 ± 0.23 0.30 ± 0.05
Stomach 5.51 ± 2.57 5.47 ± 1.63 7.75 ± 1.08 15.96 ± 6.37 8.15 ± 2.51 11.85 ± 2.73 4.85 ± 1.73 0.81 ± 0.22
LI 3.28 ± 1.94 3.12 ± 0.89 2.26 ± 0.09 2.68 ± 0.51 4.43 ± 0.36 1.56 ± 0.23 0.86 ± 0.18 0.11 ± 0.02
SI 1.67 ± 0.86 1.84 ± 0.81 1.61 ± 0.33 2.49 ± 0.29 1.86 ± 0.58 1.81 ± 0.12 1.10 ± 0.33 0.08 ± 0.01
Bone 1.38 ± 0.24 1.39 ± 0.41 1.73 ± 0.48 2.20 ± 0.39 1.51 ± 0.49 1.47 ± 0.31 0.86 ± 0.37 0.10 ± 0.02
Muscle 1.20 ± 0.47 0.64 ± 0.14 0.73 ± 0.04 0.86 ± 0.05 1.01 ± 0.18 0.78 ± 0.15 0.34 ± 0.09 0.05 ± 0.03
Tumor 3.11 ± 0.40 2.03 ± 0.80 2.51 ± 0.58 2.96 ± 0.59 2.04 ± 0.67 2.27 ± 0.20 2.10 ± 0.61 0.18 ± 0.07

Values are presented as the percentage of injected dose per gram (% ID/g, mean ± SD, n = 5 at each time point)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Uptake kinetic of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom in the major four organs with highest radioactivity and tumor tissue in F3II tumor-bearing mice after the first 480 min. Eight- to ten-week-old mice were injected intravenously with 12.5 mg/kg of 131labeled-venom. At designated time points, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and dissected. Radioactivity associated with the tumor and normal tissues was measured. Data were reported as means ± SD (n = 5). Bars illustrate standard deviations.

Table 3 depicts the tissue distribution of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom after PO administration. Only stomach and kidney showed radioactivity higher than 1 %ID/g with 8.60 ± 2.26 and 1.68 ± 0.45 %ID/g at 20 min and 40 min, respectively. Besides, spleen and lung were the third and four major organs with the highest radioactivity (0.72 ± 0.09 and 0.64 ± 0.19 %ID/g, respectively) at 40 min later. Tumor tissue exhibited its highest uptake (0.27 ± 0.06 %ID/g) after 40 min of 131I-R. junceus venom administration (Table 3).

Table 3.

Radioactivity in organs after oral administration of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom in F3II tumor-bearing mice

ORGAN 10 min 20 min 40 min 90 min 180 min 300 min 480 min 1440 min
Blood 0.61 ± 0.2 0.81 ± 0.05 0.86± 0.19 0.72 ± 0.12 0.55 ± 0.19 0.57 ± 0.03 0.40 ± 0.12 0.04 ± 0.02
Heart 0.30 ± 0.1 0.32 ± 0.07 0.27 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.1 0.19 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.03
Lung 0.34 ± 0.09 0.5 ± 0.16 0.64 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.12 0.39 ± 0.06 0.34 ± 0.067 0.35 ± 0.06 0.04 ± 0.01
Liver 0.33 ± 0.10 0.35 ± 0.07 0.33 ± 0.12 0.22 ± 0.10 0.19 ± 0.09 0.17 ± 0.09 0.16 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.00
Spleen 0.28 ± 0.07 0.44 ± 0.12 0.72 ± 0.09 0.46 ± 0.10 0.40 ± 0.17 0.41 ± 0.09 0.49 ± 0.13 0.06 ± 0.02
Kidney 0.28 ± 0.07 0.87 ± 0.20 1.68 ± 0.45 1.39 ± 0.36 1.81 ± 0.27 1.81 ± 0.42 1.95 ± 0.45 0.09 ± 0.02
Stomach 2.92 ± 0.91 8.60 ± 2.26 6.09 ± 1.78 2.23 ± 0.37 0.99 ± 0.26 0.49 ± 0.86 0.48 ± 0.16 0.08 ± 0.02
LI 0.26 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.13 0.44 ± 0.08 0.24 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.07 0.37 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.12 0.03 ± 0.01
SI 0.18 ± 0.00 0.34 ± 0.14 0.33 ± 0.08 0.27 ± 0.06 0.23 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.05 0.24 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.03
Bone 0.18 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.04 0.4 ± 0.09 0.29 ± 0.1 0.26 ± 0.06 0.19 ± 0.09 0.17 ± 0.00 0.06 ± 0.02
Muscle 0.1 ± 0.07 0.12 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.03 0.10 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.00 0.06 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.00
Tumor 0.11 ± 0.04 0.16 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.06 0.22 ± 0.09 0.25 ± 0.05 0.23 ± 0.03 0.20 ± 0.05 0.02 ± 0.02

Values are presented as percentage of injected dose per gram (% ID/g, mean ± SD, n = 5 at each time-point)

By PO route, similar to IV route, three out of four major organs in terms of radioactivity reached the maximum value and then displayed a decreased along the time (Fig. 3). Only kidney tissue showed a consistent radioactivity uptake (Fig. 3). Similarly, after maximum uptake in tumor tissue, there was a consistent behavior in terms of radioactivity (~0.2 %ID/g; Fig. 3). In PO administration, the gastrointestinal tract represents an aggressive environment. In this sense, we studied the potential degradation process of scorpion venom in SGJ assay. After 20 min of incubation, control untreated and hydrochloric acid samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot using anti-R. junceus IgG antibodies. Figure 4 (lane A) shows the SDS-PAGE of R. junceus venom in untreated sample with protein bands at 67 kDa, between 45 kDa, and 29 kDa, as well as at 18.4 kDa and 14.3 kDa.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Uptake kinetic of 131I-labeled R. junceus venom in the major four organs with highest radioactivity and tumor tissue in F3II tumor-bearing mice after the first 8 h. Eight- to ten-week-old mice were administered 12.5 mg/kg, orally. At designated time points, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and dissected. Radioactivity associated with the tumor and normal tissues was measured. Data are reported as means ± SD (n = 5). Bars illustrate standard deviations.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Non-reduced SDS-PAGE and Western blot of R. junceus scorpion venom. Lane A, SDS-PAGE of untreated scorpion venom; lane B, Western blot of untreated scorpion venom; lane C, SDS-PAGE of simulated gastric juice-treated scorpion venom; lane D, Western blot of SGJ-treated scorpion venom (lane D). M, molecular marker

Western blot revealed that anti-R. junceus IgG antibodies was able to recognize protein bands in control untreated samples (Fig. 4, lane B). Meanwhile, scorpion venom in SGJ did not show any protein bands at 67 kDa, 45 kDa, 29 kDa, and 18.4 kDa, but at the 14.3 kDa band (Fig. 4, lane C). Western blot using specific anti-R. junceus IgG antibodies could only recognize low molecular proteins bands in SGJ-treated scorpion venom (Fig. 4, lane D).

DISCUSSION

R. junceus scorpion venom has shown potential as an anticancer natural product due to cytotoxic selective effect against epithelial cancer cells in vitro. Tissue distribution and kinetic experiments of this venom could be a starting point to understand its behavior in the organism.. For this purpose, 131I-labeled R. junceus venom was administered by IV and PO routes in tumor-bearing mice.

The radioiodination has previously been used successfully for PK and BD studies of venoms[13]. In PK studies, scorpion venom radioiodination has been useful to describe the PK behavior after parenteral injection and to explain the ineffectiveness of some antisera, after envenomation, mainly due to delay in antiserum administration[14]. Meanwhile, in BD studies, the use of radioiodination has been able to identify the primary sites of venoms action[15]. In our experiments, in IV route, the initial phase is characterized by fast distribution preceded by short distribution half-life of R. junceus scorpion venom. This characteristic has been seen in different scorpion venoms[16,17]. This rapid process is due to scorpion toxins and is in accordance with the rapid appearance of sign and symptoms in the stung victims[18,19]. In PO administration, considering Tmax, the absorption of venom was slow, followed by a slow distribution phase compared to IV route. This trend of toxin distribution in PO rout may reduce the toxic effects or delay any potential pharmacological effect compared to other administration routes.

In the experiments, the elimination half-life shows to be slow (T½ > 8 h) and similar in both cases (IV and PO routes). This behavior is the same as some other scorpion venoms with elimination half-life between 6-24 h[20]. The Vd, in both cases, were higher than the total blood volume of mice, showing that this scorpion venom can reach all tissue of the animals as was detected during BD experiments, in all selected organs. The highest uptake in each organ was different when comparing both administration routes. These results indicate that the PK profile and the main target organs depend on the administration route of the venom. This characteristic is similar to other compounds evaluated by the same administration routes in our study[21].

On other hand, differences were observed in the clearance kinetics of radioactivity in kidney, after PO administration. This observation represents a particular

finding in our experiment. In PO route, starting from maximum peak concentration until 480 min, kidney uptake was consistent. Some researchers have reported that kidney uptake is influenced by the interactions of radiopharmaceuticals with renal compartments such as the glomerulus and proximal tubules. The uptake of the radiolabeled compound into cells of the proximal tubules is subject to different mechanisms depending on the total charge, distribution of charge, and structural size[22]. Peptides and small molecules often interact with cells of the proximal tubules, resulting in effective reabsorption and renal trapping of the radiopharmaceutical[23]. Eder et al.[24] have shown that lysine positively charged peptides augment their kidney binding. One explanation for this observation would be the exposure of negatively charged sites located on the membranes of renal tubular cells which facilitate the accumulation of radiopharmaceutical peptides in the kidneys. Scorpion venom is a complex mixture of positively charged peptides acting mainly on ion channels and/or membrane receptors[1,25,26]. The PO administration of 131I-labeled venom can generate a high proportion of peptide fragments bounded to 131I. These 131I-labeled fragments, along with the remaining ones, can enhance the renal uptake of toxins and keep them for a longer period in the proximal tubules in kidney. In both administration routes, kidney, lung, and stomach showed the highest radioactivity.

By IV route, after reaching maximum peak concentration of 131I-labeled scorpion venom in tumor tissue, the uptake was similar during the experiment (~2 %ID/g). This characteristic was the same as PO where radioactivity was low but consistent in tumor (~0.2 %ID/g). This low uptake agrees with the PO bioavailability of scorpion venom of around 30% compared to IV route, indicating a massive loss of venom components. After PO administration, there was a lower percentage of 131I-venom proteins present in blood than that observed by endovenous route. This means that a large proportion of 131I-labelled venom has been degraded before and during absorption process in gut when administered PO. This degradation occurred because of harsh environment of GI tract[1,25], inducing dehalogenation and releasing 131I- and

131I-containing fragments[20]. Gastric mucosa has the capacity to actively accumulate free iodine. The constitutive expression of gastric sodium/iodine symporter in membranes of gastric cells mediates the active uptake of free iodine in gastric environment and from the bloodstream into the gastric lumen (gastric juice). The iodine concentrated in the gastric juice is excreted by glomerular filtration through the kidney[27].

Based on the above facts, after PO administration, the counts obtained from all tissues analyzed in the study could, with high probability, match to 131I-venom components/fragments. Besides, a previous report has evaluated the behavior of large proteins (150 kDa) during PO administration and identified that 131I-labelled large proteins are degraded, and 131I-protein fragments less than 12 kDa are able to traverse the gastrointestinal tract and appear in blood[28]. Additionally, Wang et al.[29] have evaluated the stability of larger, small and cyclic peptides in gastric and intestinal fluids in vitro. The authors concluded that peptide stability varies widely depending on the amino acid sequence and structures. Cyclic peptides become the most stable peptides because disulfide bond linkages offer high rigidity and low flexibility, which provide resistance against enzymatic cleavage of susceptible peptide bonds. However, larger peptides are more vulnerable[29].

Scorpion venom consists of various proteins and peptides. Proteins include enzymes such as phospholipase, hyaluronidase, L-amino acid oxidase, metalloproteinase, serine protease, and muco-proteins[25]. The highest proportion of scorpion venom components belongs to peptides less than 8 kDa with three to four disulfide bridges that target sodium, calcium, and potassium ion channels. There are also some anionic and antimicrobial peptides without disulfide bonds with a high frequency in scorpion venom[26,30]. The presence of disulfide-bridged in the peptides makes them more stable and less accessible to enzymatic cleavage[29,31]. Then, after PO administration, some 131I-venom components would pass through the gastrointestinal tract and reach the blood circulation in intact form due to the low molecular weight and possibly a strong secondary structure characterized by 3-4 disulfide bonds. Even after degradation process, some 131I-labeled fragments could keep their biological effect and reach target organs/tumor. Vallespí et al.[32] have assessed the PK and BD behaviors of CIGB-552, as an antitumor peptide, on tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. Experiments have shown that the degradation pattern of CIGB-552, based on serine-proteases activities in blood generates peptide metabolites that still keep the cytotoxic effect against tumor cells. The presence of consistent radioactive counts in tumor after PO administration suggests that a low proportion of undegraded 131I-venom components or 131I-labelled fragments might be able to reach tumor tissue, as was evidenced in BD. This observation suggests that tumor-targeting properties of scorpion venom, by PO, were not totally affected respect to IV route. Additionally, Krifi et al.[20] compared radioiodination and ELISA methods in PK studies using a low-molecular-weight fraction from the scorpion venom Androctonus australis. Authors concluded that antibody recognition-based methods, like ELISA, could distinguish degraded and native toxins as an advantage respect to radioactivity methods.

Based on these previous statements, we carried out SGJ experiments to follow fate of scorpion venom in the gastric environment. Using Western blot analysis, we showed that IgG-anti R. junceus venom still recognize some components from scorpion venom, in the low-molecular-weight zone, suggesting the presence of a low proportion of native peptides probably disulfide-bridged containing peptides among others. Moreover, previous studies by our group and others, described the presence of hyaluronidases around 45 kDa in R. junceus scorpion venom determined by SDS-PAGE[12,33]. These enzymes are partially responsible for toxicity related to lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase release, when scorpion venom is administrated by parenteral route in mice[12]. In SGJ, the 45-kDa band was lost due to the presence of pepsin and acidic environment, which indicates a reduction in toxic components of scorpion venom by PO. On other hand, in major organs like kidney, lung, and stomach, radioactivity reached the maximum and decreased rapidly, after IV and PO administration. This behavior suggests that some scorpion venom components have higher affinity to tumor tissue, which is in agreement with our previous results from in vitro experiments where scorpion venom showed to be selective for epithelial cancer cells respect to normal counterpart[6].

To our knowledge, the venoms from other scorpion species have never been evaluated for toxicological or pharmacological properties by PO. The base of our particular case comes from the traditional medicine in Cuba, where this endemic scorpion, R. junceus, has popularly been used by PO. By PO administration or IV injection, the R. junceus scorpion venom can reach all tissues in the body. The scorpion venom has a long-lasting presence in tumor tissue compared to main organs where scorpion venom presence is transient. The PO absolute bioavailability of scorpion venom is low, which suggests high degradation of venom components but still keeping the tumor-targeting properties. The knowledge of differences between PO and IV routes should be considered for future experiments in toxicological and pharmacological experimental models. The PK and tissue distribution results represent a starting point for future experiments with this scorpion venom as a potential anticancer natural extract.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to express their gratitude to personnel from Cell Culture Service Laboratory of Tropical Medicine Institute “Pedro Kourí” for cell culture maintenance. Authors also greatly appreciate the technical assistance of Gina D`Suze and Moises Sandoval from Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research (IVIC) for obtaining the antibodies against Rhopalurus junceus venom. We also acknowledge the cooperation of Oncology and Radiobiology National Institute and the financial support of Laboratories of Biopharmaceuticals and Chemistries Productions (LABIOFAM, Cuba).

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bosmans F, Tytgat J. Voltage-gated sodium channel modulation by scorpion α-toxins. Toxicon. 2007;49(2):142–158. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quintero-Hernández V, Jiménez-Vargas JM, Gurrola GB, Valdivia HH, Possani LD. Scorpion venom components that affect ion-channels function. Toxicon. 2013;76:328–342. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ortiz E, Gurrola GB, Schwartz EF, Possani LD. Scorpion venom components as potential candidates for drug development. Toxicon. 2015;93:125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.11.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ding J, Chua PJ, Bay BH, Gopalakrishnakone P. Scorpion venoms as a potential source of novel cancer therapeutic compounds. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood) 2014;239(4):387–393. doi: 10.1177/1535370213513991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Al Asmari AK, Khan AQ. Investigation of in vivo potential of scorpion venom against skin tumorigenesis in mice via targeting markers associated with cancer development. Drug design, development and therapy. 2016;10:3387–3397. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S113171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Díaz-García A, Morier-Díaz L, Frión-Herrera Y, Rodríguez-Sánchez H, Caballero-Lorenzo Y, Mendoza-Llanes D, Riquenes-Garlobo Y, Fraga-Castro J. In vitro anticancer effect of venom from Cuban scorpion Rhopalurus junceus against a panel of human cancer cell lines. Journal of venum research. 2013;4:5–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Díaz-García A, Ruiz-Fuentes J, Rodríguez-Sánchez H, Fraga Castro J. Rhopalurus junceus scorpion venom induces apoptosis in the triple negative human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Journal of venom research. 2017;8:9–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Herrera Y, Heras N, Cardoso D. Adaptación a microplacas y validación de la técnica de Lowry. Vaccimonitor. 1999;3:7–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hunter W, Greenwood F. Preparation of iodine-131 labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Nature. 1962;194:495–496. doi: 10.1038/194495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sevcik C, D'Suze G, Díaz P, Salazar V, Hidalgo C, Azpúrua H, Bracho N. Modelling Tityus scorpion venom and antivenom pharmacokinetics. Evidence of active immunoglobulin G's F(ab')2 extrusion mechanism from blood to tissues. Toxicon. 2004;44(7):731–741. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fu T, Abbott U, Hatzos C. Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid-a comparative study. Journal of agriculture and food chemistry. 2002;50(24):7154–7160. doi: 10.1021/jf020599h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Díaz-García A, Ruiz-Fuentes J, Yglesias-Rivera A, Rodríguez-Sánchez H, Riquenes Garlobo Y, Fleitas Martinez O, Fraga Castro J. Enzymatic analysis of venom from Cuban scorpion Rhopalurus junceus . Journal of venom research. 2015;6:11–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jalali A, Moazen S, Babaee M, Dadashzade S, Droudi A. The pharmacokinetics of Iranian scorpion Odonthubuthus doriae venom and the available antivenom. Journal of venom research. 2010;1:48–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ismail M, Abdullah M, Morad A, Ageel A. Pharmacokinetics of125I-labelled venom from the scorpion Androctonus amoreuxi Aud.and Sav. Toxicon. 1980;18(3):301–308. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(80)90009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ismail M, Kertesz G, Osman O, Sidra M. Distribution of125I labelled scorpion (Leiurus quinquestriatus H and E) venom in rat. Toxicon. 1974;12(2):209–211. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(74)90247-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nunan E, Moraes M, Cardoso V, Moraes-Santos T. Effect of age on body distribution of Tityustoxin from Tityus serrulatus scorpion venom in rats. Life science. 2003;73(3):319–325. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00264-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jalali A, Bavarsad-Omidian N, Babaei M, Najafzadeh H, Rezaei S. The pharmacokinetics of Hemiscorpius lepturus scorpion venom and Razi antivenom following intramuscular administration in rat. Journal of venom research. 2012;3:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dutto M, Dutto L, Scaglione N, Bertero M. Euscorpius (Scorpiones, Euscorpiidae):three cases of stings in northwestern Italy. Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases. 2010;16(4):659–663. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Petricevich V. Scorpion venom and the inflammatory response. Mediators inflammation. 2010;2010:903295. doi: 10.1155/2010/903295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Krifi M, Savin S, Debray M, Bon C, El Ayeb M, Choumet V. Pharmacokinetic studies of scorpion venom before and after antivenom immunotherapy. Toxicon. 2005;45(2):187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Qiao H, Zhang X, Wang T, Liang L, Chang W, Xia H. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and bioavailability of isoliquiritigenin after intravenous and oral administration. Pharmaceutical biology. 2014;52(2):228–236. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2013.832334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gotthardt M, van Eerd-Vismale J, Oyen W, de Jong M, Zhang H, Rolleman E, Maecke H, Béhé M, Boerman O. Indication for different mechanisms of kidney uptake of radiolabeled peptides. Journal of nuclear medicine. 2007;48(4):596–601. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.036020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Akizawa H, Uehara T, Arano Y. Renal uptake and metabolism of radiopharmaceuticals derived from peptides and proteins. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2008;60(12):1319–1328. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eder M, Löhr T, Bauder-Wüst U, Reber M, Mier W, Schäfer M, Haberkorn U, Eisenhut M. Pharmacokinetic properties of peptidic radiopharmaceuticals:reduced uptake of (EH)3-conjugates in important organs. Journal of nuclear medicine. 2013;54(8):1327–1330. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.114512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Possani L, Rodríguez de la Vega R. Scorpion Venom Peptides. In: AJ, editor. The Handook of Biologically Active Peptides. USA: Academic Press; 2006. pp. 339–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.de Olivera UC C, andido DM, Dorce VA, Junqueira-de-AzevedoIde L. The transcriptome recipe for the venom cocktail of Tityus bahiensis scorpion. Toxicon. 2015;95:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Altorjay A, Dohán O, Szilágyi A, Paroder M, Wapnir I, Carrasco N. Expression of the Na+/I- symporter (NIS) is markedly decreased or absent in gastric cancer and intestinal metaplastic mucosa of Barrett esophagus. BMC cancer. 2007;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hardy RN. The break-down of 131-I-gamma-globulin in the digestive tract of the new-born pig. Journal of physiology. 1969;205(2):435–451. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang J, Yadav V, Smart A, Tajiri S, Basit A. Toward oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals:an assessment of the gastrointestinal stability of 17 peptide drugs. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2015;12(3):966–973. doi: 10.1021/mp500809f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goudet C, Chi C, Tytgat J. An overview of toxins and genes from the venom of the Asian scorpion Buthus martensi Karsch. Toxicon. 2002;40(9):1239–1258. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(02)00142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ojeda P, Chan L, Poth A, Wang C, Craik D. The role of disulfide bonds in structure and activity of chlorotoxin. Future medicinal chemistry. 2014;6(15):1617–1628. doi: 10.4155/fmc.14.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.VallespíM Pimentel G, Cabrales-Rico A, Garza J, Oliva B, Mendoza O, Gomez Y, Basaco T, Sánchez I, Calderón C, Rodriguez J, Markelova M, Fichtner I, Astrada S, Bollati-Fogolín M, Garay H, Reyes O. Antitumor efficacy, pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies of the anticancer peptide CIGB-552 in mouse models. Journal of peptide science. 2014;20(11):850–859. doi: 10.1002/psc.2676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rodríguez-Ravelo R, Coronas FI, Zamudio FZ, González-Morales L, López GE, Urquiola AR, Possani LD. The Cuban scorpion Rhopalurus junceus (Scorpiones, Buthidae):component variations in venom samples collected in different geographical areas. Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases. 2013;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1678-9199-19-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Biomedical Journal are provided here courtesy of Pasteur Institute of Iran

RESOURCES