Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2019 Feb 8;70(8):2313–2323. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery463

Mutations in the Arabidopsis ROL17/isopropylmalate synthase 1 locus alter amino acid content, modify the TOR network, and suppress the root hair cell development mutant lrx1

Myriam Schaufelberger 1,#, Florian Galbier 1,2,#, Aline Herger 1, Rita de Brito Francisco 1, Stefan Roffler 1, Gilles Clement 1,4, Anouck Diet 3, Stefan Hörtensteiner 1, Thomas Wicker 1, Christoph Ringli 1,
PMCID: PMC6463047  PMID: 30753668

Interfering with leucine biosynthesis affects the TOR network and causes changes in cell growth that lead to suppression of the cell wall formation mutant lrx1.

Keywords: Arabidopsis, AZD-8055, IPMS1, leucine, extensin, LRX1, rol17, root, root hair, TOR

Abstract

The growth and development of organisms must be tightly controlled and adjusted to nutrient availability and metabolic activities. The Target of Rapamycin (TOR) network is a major control mechanism in eukaryotes and influences processes such as translation, mitochondrial activity, production of reactive oxygen species, and the cytoskeleton. In Arabidopsis thaliana, inhibition of the TOR kinase causes changes in cell wall architecture and suppression of phenotypic defects of the cell wall formation mutant lrx1 (leucine-rich repeat extensin 1). The rol17 (repressor of lrx1 17) mutant was identified as a new suppressor of lrx1 that induces also a short root phenotype. The ROL17 locus encodes isopropylmalate synthase 1, a protein involved in leucine biosynthesis. Dependent on growth conditions, mutations in ROL17 do not necessarily alter the level of leucine, but always cause development of the rol17 mutant phenotypes, suggesting that the mutation does not only influence leucine biosynthesis. Changes in the metabolome of rol17 mutants are also found in plants with inhibited TOR kinase activity. Furthermore, rol17 mutants show reduced sensitivity to the TOR kinase inhibitor AZD-8055, indicating a modified TOR network. Together, these data suggest that suppression of lrx1 by rol17 is the result of an alteration of the TOR network.

Introduction

Owing to their sessile nature, plants have a particularly strong need to monitor environmental conditions to optimize growth and development. This optimization is not limited to the targeted uptake of nutrients but includes adjusting metabolic activities to the available resources. The Target of Rapamycin (TOR) network controls eukaryotic cell growth by sensing nutrient availability and growth factors, and integrates these signals to adjust a wide range of cellular processes such as transcriptional and translational activities, autophagy, mitochondrial activity, and the dynamics of the cytoskeleton (Leith and Hall, 2011; Dobrenel et al., 2016a). The phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like serine/threonine kinase TOR is central to the TOR network; tor knockout mutations are lethal in many species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, underlining the importance of this protein (Menand et al., 2002; Laplante and Sabatini, 2012). Rapamycin, a TOR kinase-specific inhibitor, is instrumental in the characterization of the TOR network and is used in medical applications owing to its growth-inhibiting, anti-tumor, and immunosuppressive properties (Huang et al., 2003; Martelli et al., 2018). Rapamycin inhibits the TOR kinase by forming a ternary complex with FKBP12 (FK506 binding protein 12) and TOR. Owing to amino acid polymorphisms, however, the FKBP12 of Arabidopsis and other plants is not very effectively recruited into this complex; expression of, for example, the human or yeast FKBP12 renders Arabidopsis more rapamycin sensitive (Mahfouz et al., 2006; Sormani et al., 2007). The development of a new generation of FKBP12-independent, TOR-specific ATP-competitive active-site inhibitors such as AZD-8055 circumvents this problem and provides excellent tools for more direct analysis of the TOR network in plants by pharmaceutical means (Chresta et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2011; Montané and Menand, 2013; Dobrenel et al., 2016b; Schepetilnikov et al., 2017). As an alternative strategy, RNA-mediated silencing of the TOR gene has been used to interfere with TOR signaling (Deprost et al., 2007; Caldana et al., 2013) and revealed genes and metabolites that are under the influence of the TOR network. The identification of mutations in genes encoding TOR-interacting proteins such as LST8 (lethal with Sec13-8) or RAPTOR have been helpful in characterizing the TOR network (Anderson et al., 2005; Deprost et al., 2005; Ahn et al., 2011; Moreau et al., 2012). Modulation of the activity of proteins involved in the TOR network frequently leads to an alteration in the sensitivity of the TOR network to TOR kinase inhibitors. This characteristic feature has been used in chemical genetic screens to identify components or processes that are functionally connected to the TOR network. The genes identified in this way have diverse functions including transcriptional regulation, amino acid metabolism, and tRNA maturation (Chan et al., 2000; Goehring et al., 2003; Li et al., 2015).

Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses have revealed that interfering with the TOR kinase has a broad impact on primary (e.g. the tricarboxylic acid cycle) and secondary (e.g. flavonoids) metabolism (Moreau et al., 2012; Ren et al., 2012; Caldana et al., 2013). Its inhibition interferes with cell growth and induces autophagy, a process by which cellular components are degraded to recycle nutrients (Liu and Bassham, 2010). Together with a concomitant inhibition of translation, this causes an increase in the amino acid content of the cell. The energy-intensive translational machinery is a major target of the TOR pathway (Laplante and Sabatini, 2012; Dobrenel et al., 2016b), and mutual influence of the TOR network and amino acid levels has been demonstrated (Dobrenel et al., 2016a).

Plant cell growth is driven by turgor pressure exerted by the cell and limited by the expansion of the cell wall that surrounds each cell (Cosgrove, 2014). The expression of cell-wall-related genes and the cell wall architecture are modified upon altering the activity of the TOR network by genetic or pharmaceutical means (Leiber et al., 2010; Ren et al., 2012; Caldana et al., 2013). Leucine-rich repeat extensins (LRXs) are extracellular proteins involved in cell wall formation, and mutations in the LRX genes cause changes in cell wall composition and ultrastructure (Draeger et al., 2015; Fabrice et al., 2018). Analysis of LRX proteins expressed in different tissues revealed that they act as extracellular receptors of RALF (rapid alkalinization factor) peptides (Mecchia et al., 2017), and function together with the Catharanthus roseus-like receptor kinase FERONIA (Haruta et al., 2014; Dünser et al., 2018) to establish a link between the cell wall and the cytoplasm. Suppression of the Arabidopsis lrx1 mutant phenotype by interfering with TOR signaling suggests that the LRX-related process is under the influence of the TOR network (Leiber et al., 2010).

The observed suppression of lrx1 by alteration of the TOR network led us to investigate whether new TOR signaling components can be identified using suppression of lrx1 and altered sensitivity to the TOR kinase inhibitor AZD-8055 as parameters for selection. Here, we describe the characterization of rol17, which suppresses lrx1 and shows reduced sensitivity to AZD-8055. The rol17 locus encodes isopropyl malate synthase 1 (IPMS1), an enzyme involved in leucine (Leu) biosynthesis. Metabolomic analysis revealed that the effect of rol17 does not correlate with reduced Leu accumulation, suggesting that IPMS1 might be involved in establishing a link between amino acid biosynthesis and the TOR network that is required to achieve coordinated plant growth and development.

Materials and methods

Plant growth and molecular markers

Arabidopsis thaliana, ecotype Columbia (Col), was used for all experiments. The SAIL line rol17-2 is in the qrt1-2 mutant background (Sessions et al., 2002), which required the qrt1-2 mutant to be used as the wild-type control of rol17-2. Seeds were sterilized for 10 minutes with 1% sodium chlorite, 0.03% Triton X-100, washed three times with sterile water, and then grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [0.5 × MS, 2% sucrose, 100 μg/ml myo-inositol, 0.6% phytagel (Sigma)] or on Hoagland (HG) medium (Barberon et al., 2008), in a growth chamber at 22 °C, with a 16 h/8 h light/dark cycle, in vertical orientation. For crossing and propagation, seedlings were planted in soil and grown under the same conditions. The T-DNA insertion lines were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center and were produced as described by Alonso et al. (2003). The ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of lrx1 was previously described by Diet et al. (2006). Detection of the EMS-induced point mutations and the T-DNA alleles was done by PCR, using the primers listed in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3 at JXB online.

Phenotypic analysis of seedlings

The root hair phenotype was analyzed with an MZ125 stereomicroscope (Leica) and images were obtained with a DFC420 digital camera (Leica). For root length measurements, seedlings were grown as described above, the plates were scanned, and root length was measured using ImageJ software. On one plate, two genotypes were grown on a single lane, which was always at the same position on the plates (same distance from the top), to avoid positional effects that can influence plant growth. Several plate replicates were used to produce the data points.

AZD-8055 treatment

AZD-8055 was dissolved in DMSO and added to the MS medium (described above) after autoclaving. Sterilized seeds were directly plated, germinated, and grown on medium containing AZD-8055 for 7 days. For the control treatment without AZD-8055, only DMSO was added to the medium.

Whole-genome sequencing

For whole-genome sequencing, 10 seedlings of an F2 population segregating for rol17 and showing a wild type-like phenotype were isolated, and the phenotype was confirmed in the F3 generation. Fifty seedlings of each of the 10 F3 families were pooled, ground in liquid nitrogen, and DNA was extracted following an established protocol (Fulton et al., 1995). In parallel, DNA of the lrx1 mutant was also extracted. DNA sequencing corresponding to a 20-fold coverage was outsourced (BGI Tech Solutions, Hong Kong) and obtained for the lrx1 mutant and the lrx1 rol17 double mutant. Sequences of the lrx1 and lrx1 rol17 mutants were separately mapped to the Arabidopsis genome (available on TAIR, https://www.arabidopsis.org/; last accessed Jan 2019), and polymorphisms to the lrx1 sequence were subtracted from those to the lrx1 rol17 mutant. The resulting list of rol17-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was filtered for mutations changing the sequence of encoded proteins based on the annotation provided by the TAIR database. For the SNP selection we used in-house Perl scripts (which can be provided upon request).

RNA isolation and RT–PCR

Seedlings were grown for 8 days on MS medium as described above in a vertical orientation, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground with a mortar and pestle. Approximately 100 mg fresh material was used for RNA isolation using the total RNA isolation system (Promega). The RNA was quantified by using ND-1000 (Nanodrop) and 300 ng was used for reverse transcription using the iScript kit (Bio-Rad). The DNA produced was diluted 10-fold in nuclease-free water and 1 µl was used for PCR, using primers specific for IPMS1 and ACTIN2 (for primer sequences, see Supplementary Table S4).

Targeted Leu analysis by LC-MS

For comparison of Leu levels, entire seedlings grown for 8 days in a vertical orientation on either 0.5 × MS or HG medium containing phytagel (Sigma) and Ultrapure Agarose (Invitrogen), respectively, were collected. Per sample, 100 mg of fresh material was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground with glass beads in a Retsch mill. Polar compounds were extracted with 70% methanol and 1 µg ml–1 of the internal standard DL-2-aminoheptanedioic acid. The samples were briefly vortexed and centrifuged at 15 000 × g for 15 min. The collected supernatants were fully evaporated in a Savant SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 42 °C, resuspended in 30 μl of 50% acetonitrile, and transferred to liquid chromatography (LC) vials. Leu quantification was performed using an ultra-performance LC (UPLC) system (Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000) coupled to a Bruker Compact electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). The UPLC separation was performed with a C18 reverse-phase column (ACQUITY UPLC TM BEH C18, 1.7 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm; Waters) at 45 °C using the following gradient of solvent A [acetonitrile, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid] and solvent B [H2O, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid]: 0–0.1 min, 99% A; 0.1–7 min, 30% A; 7.1–10 min, 99% A. The flow rate was 0.3 ml min–1 and 5 µl of each sample was injected. The electrospray ionization source was operated in positive mode and parameters were set as follows: gas temperature 220 °C, drying gas 9 l min–1, nebulizer 2.2 bar, capillary voltage 4500 V, and end plate offset 500 V. The instrument was set to acquire m/z 50–1300. All data were analyzed using DataAnalysis (version 4.2, Bruker Daltonics) and TargetAnalysis (version 1.3, Bruker Daltonics). Absolute Leu quantification was based on a standard curve between 0.06 and 1 µg. This analysis was performed using QuantAnalysis software (version 2.2, Bruker Daltonics).

Metabolomics analysis by GC-MS

Seedlings were grown for 8 days in vertical orientation on HG medium supplemented with 1% glucose and 0.8% UltraPure Agarose (Invitrogen), and 100 mg of fresh tissue was collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground in a Retsch mill. A 50 mg sample of the ground powder was resuspended in 1 ml of –20 °C precooled water:acetonitrile:isopropanol (2:3:3, v:v:v) containing the internal standard ribitol at 4 µg ml–1 (Fiehn et al., 2008) vortexed, and then shaken at 1400 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C in an Eppendorf thermomixer. After centrifugation, 100 µl was dried overnight in a Savant SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 35 °C. A 10 µl volume of 20 mg ml–1 methoxyamine (Sigma) containing 10 µg ml–1 of a C8 to C30 fatty acid methyl esters (FAMES) mixture was added and the samples were shaken for 90 minutes at 1400 rpm and 28 °C in an Eppendorf thermomixer. Next, 90 µl of N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide (Aldrich) was added and the reaction continued for 30 min at 37 °C. After cooling, 50 µl was transferred to an Agilent vial for injection. Four hours after derivatization, 1 µl of sample was injected in splitless mode on an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5977B mass spectrometer. The column was an Rxi-5SilMS (30 m with 10 m Integra-Guard column, Restek). The liner (Restek) was changed before each series analysis of 24 samples. The oven temperature was 70 °C for 7 min and then increased at 10 °C min–1 to 330 °C for 4 min (run length 36.5 min). Helium constant flow was 0.7 ml min–1. Temperatures were the following: injector 250 °C, transfer line 300 °C, source 230 °C, and quadrupole 150 °C. Samples and blanks were randomized. Three independently derivatized quality controls (pools of all the samples) were injected at the beginning, middle, and end of the analysis for monitoring the derivatization stability. An alkane mix (C10, C12, C15, C19, C22, C28, C32, C36) was injected in the middle of the queue for external retention index (RI) calibration and FAMES (C8 to C30) were added to each sample for internal RI calibration. Five scans per second were acquired. After the splitless analysis was performed, samples were injected in split mode (1:30) to avoid saturation of abundant compounds. Raw Agilent data files were converted to NetCDF format and analyzed with AMDIS (http://chemdata.nist.gov/mass-spc/amdis/). A home retention indices/mass spectra library built from the NIST (Agilent), Golm (Kopka et al., 2005), and Fiehn (Zhou et al., 2007) databases and standard compounds were used for metabolite identification. After validation of the identifications, a more accurate quantification was performed on a chosen ion trace using TargetLynx software (Waters) after conversion of the NetCDF file to MassLynx format (Databridge software, Waters). Statistical analysis was performed with TMEV. Univariate analysis by permutation (one-way and two-way ANOVA) was first used to select the significant metabolites (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis (hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis) was then carried out on the selected metabolites. The concentrations of 77 metabolites were expressed in µg mg–1 fresh weight in the following way: ribitol (internal standard) normalized peak area was calibrated to the response coefficient to ribitol of the standard of each of these 77 metabolites (one point in splitless mode and one point in split mode to ensure that the response was linear). This one-point calibration gives a good estimation of the absolute concentration.

Results

rol17 suppresses lrx1 and reduces sensitivity to the TOR inhibitor AZD-8055

The lrx1 mutant of Arabidopsis is characterized by a defect in root hair development but shows otherwise normal root growth because LRX1 is predominantly expressed in the root hairs (Baumberger et al., 2001). Wild-type Col seedlings have regular and long root hairs, whereas the root hairs of the lrx1 mutant are misshapen, short, and frequently burst (Fig. 1A). To obtain mutants in which the lrx1 root hair phenotype was suppressed, lrx1 seeds were mutagenized with EMS. In the M2 generation, lrx1 rol (repressor of lrx1) mutant seedlings that developed wild type-like root hairs—that is, a suppressed lrx1 phenotype—were selected, and their phenotype was confirmed in the M3 generation (Diet et al., 2006). As inhibiting TOR kinase with rapamycin in seedlings results in altered cell wall development and the suppression of lrx1 (Leiber et al., 2010), we wanted to test whether some of the lrx1 rol mutants identified were affected in the functioning of the TOR network, using sensitivity to a TOR kinase inhibitor as a parameter. The new-generation TOR kinase inhibitor AZD-8055, which causes a reduction in root elongation (Montané and Menand, 2013), was used in this experiment. As shown in Fig. 1A, AZD-8055 also suppresses the lrx1 root hair phenotype, suggesting a comparable effect of rapamycin (as previously shown by Leiber et al., 2010) and AZD-8055. To test for AZD-8055 sensitivity, root length was used as a parameter. Among the identified mutants, the lrx1 rol17 line showed reduced sensitivity to AZD-8055. lrx1 seedlings responded to low concentrations (0.1 μM) of AZD-8055, while lrx1 rol17 seedlings were not affected at this concentration. Even at higher concentrations (0.5 μM), lrx1 rol17 seedlings showed less reduction in root length than lrx1 seedlings (Fig. 1B). This observation suggests that the rol17 mutation causes an alteration of the TOR network, and led us to pursue the characterization of the lrx1 rol17 line. lrx1 single mutants are not affected in terms of growth of the main root (Baumberger et al., 2003). However, even in the absence of AZD-8055, lrx1 rol17 mutant seedlings developed shorter roots than lrx1 (Fig. 1C), indicating that rol17 negatively affects root growth. With regard to root hair development, the lrx1 root hair formation defect is fully suppressed in the lrx1 rol17 mutant (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

rol17 suppresses lrx1 and causes hyposensitivity to AZD-8055. (A) When seedlings are grown on agar plates in vertical orientation, root hairs form regularly in the wild type (Col) but are deformed and often collapsed in the lrx1 mutant. The lrx1 rol17 mutant develops wild type-like root hairs. Bar=0.5 mm. (B) Root length of seedlings grown for 7 days in the presence of increasing concentrations of AZD-8055. The identified lrx1 rol17 mutant is less sensitive to AZD-8055, showing less reduction in root elongation (relative to growth without AZD-8055) compared with lrx1. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.01; t-test, n>20). Error bars represent SEM. (C) lrx1 rol17 mutants develop shorter roots than lrx1 at concentrations of 0 and 0.1 μM AZD-8055. Seedlings were grown for 7 days in vertical orientation. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.01; t-test, n>20). Error bars represent SEM.

Backcrossing of lrx1 rol17 with the parental lrx1 line produced F1 seedlings with an lrx1 phenotype, indicating that the rol17 mutation is recessive in nature. This was confirmed in the F2 generation, where the lrx1 and wild type-like phenotypes segregated in a 3:1 ratio (206 lrx1-like seedlings and 54 lrx1 rol17 seedlings).

ROL17 encodes isopropyl malate synthase 1

Next, we aimed to identify the rol17 locus. To this end, in the segregating F2 population of a second backcross of lrx1 rol17 with lrx1, eight plants showing a rol17 phenotype were selected, the plant material was pooled, genomic DNA was extracted, and whole-genome sequencing was performed. In parallel, the original lrx1 mutant used for EMS mutagenesis (Diet et al., 2006) was sequenced as well. A number of high-confidence polymorphisms in lrx1 rol17 compared with lrx1 were found in a region on the short arm of chromosome 1. Among these polymorphisms, four were found to change protein-coding sequences by missense mutations in the genes wall associated kinase-like 4 (WAKL4), an α/β-hydrolase (α/β-HYD), isopropyl malate synthase 1 (IPMS1), and flavin-dependent monooxygenase 1 (FMO1) (Table 1), and were thus considered prime candidates for rol17. Seedlings of the segregating F2 population of the cross lrx1 rol17 × lrx1 were tested for recombination between the different candidate loci. In this way, the wakl4 locus could be separated from the closely linked and thus co-segregating α/β-hyd, ipms1, and fmo1 mutations, resulting in an lrx1 wakl4 double mutant and an lrx1 α/β-hyd ipms1 fmo1 quadruple mutant. The lrx1 wakl4 double mutant showed a clear lrx1 root hair phenotype and long roots, excluding wakl4 as a candidate for rol17 (see Supplementary Fig. S1). lrx1 α/β-hyd ipms1 fmo1 quadruple mutant seedlings showed the rol17 phenotype, with wild type-like root hairs and short primary roots; this line is subsequently referred to as lrx1 rol17-1 (Table 2, Fig. 2A). For the three candidate genes α/β-hyd, ipms1, and fmo1, T-DNA alleles were obtained and analyzed (Table 1). Homozygous T-DNA mutants of α/β-hyd and fmo1 revealed wild type-like root growth (Supplementary Fig. S2), confirming previous findings (Chen and Umeda, 2015). By contrast, the T-DNA mutant of ipms1 developed shorter primary roots, similar to the lrx1 rol17-1 mutant and, when crossed into the lrx1 mutant background, caused suppression of lrx1 (Fig. 2A, Fig. 3). This led us to conclude that IPMS1 is allelic to ROL17. The ipms1 T-DNA mutant is subsequently referred to as rol17-2 (Table 2). The rol17-1 polymorphism is in the fourth beta sheet in the N-terminal catalytic region (de Kraker and Gershenzon, 2011). This Pro186Leu codon change is at a residue that is conserved among eudicot plants, which overall show between 60% and 90% identity at the protein level. The T-DNA insertion in rol17-2 is located in the 10th of 11 introns of the coding region (Supplementary Fig. S3) and has also been used by others (Field et al., 2004).

Table 1.

Candidate genes for the ROL17 locus

Gene identifier Gene name change in rol17-1 T-DNA lines used
At1G16150 WAKL4 Pro349Leu SAIL_912_E08
At1G18460 α/β-HYDROLASE Ser113Phe SALK_024277C
At1G18500 IPMS1 Pro186Leu SAIL_1175_E02
At1G19250 FMO1 Asp517Asn SALK_026122C

Missense mutations in protein-coding genes identified by whole-genome sequencing, co-segregating with the rol17 mutant phenotype.

Table 2.

Genetic composition of lines used for detailed analyses

line name mutations in line
lrx1 rol17 lrx1, wakl4, α/β-hyd, ipms1, fmo1
lrx1 rol17-1 lrx1, α/β-hyd, ipms1, fmo1
rol17-1 α/β-hyd, ipms1, fmo1
lrx1 rol17-2 lrx1, ipms1
rol17-2 ipms1

The listed mutations are present in the different lines.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Both rol17 alleles suppress lrx1 but show differences in gene expression. (A) rol17-1 and rol17-2 result in comparable suppression of the lrx1 root hair phenotype. Eight-day-old seedlings grown in vertical orientation are shown. Wild-type (Col) and lrx1 roots are shown for comparison. Bar=0.5 mm. (B) Scheme of IPMS1 showing the positions of the point mutation of rol17-1 and the T-DNA insertion site of rol17-2. The primer pairs (PP) used for RT–PCR amplification are indicated, with PP2 primers flanking the T-DNA insertion site in rol17-2. Expression levels were tested by semi-quantitative RT–PCR on RNA extracted from 7-day-old seedlings. Amplification of the ACTIN2 (ACT2) gene was used as an internal standard to confirm the use of comparable amounts of RNA as starting material in the different samples.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The two rol17 alleles show similar root growth phenotypes. Seedlings were grown for 7 days on MS plates in vertical orientation. qrt1-2 was used as a control because the SAIL T-DNA insertion mutant rol17-2 contains the qrt1-2 mutation in the background. The wild type (Col) was also used as a control. Root length (A), root growth (B), epidermal cell (trichoblast) length (C), and root hair length (D) were measured. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.01; t-test, n>20).

In a next step, total RNA was extracted from 7-day-old seedlings and semi-quantitative RT–PCR was performed to investigate transcript abundance in the two alleles (Fig. 2B). Using a primer pair that amplifies an IPMS1 sequence 5′ of the T-DNA insertion, a band of comparable intensity was detected in the extracts of the wild type and lrx1 rol17-1, whereas lrx1 rol17-2 resulted in a weaker band; this observation suggested that the incomplete ipms1 mRNA in lrx1 rol17-2 is largely degraded, confirming previous findings (Field et al., 2004). To ascertain that the intron-localized T-DNA insertion in lrx1 rol17-2 indeed prevents proper splicing of the mRNA, primers located in the exons flanking the T-DNA insertion site were used for RT–PCR. No PCR product was observed in lrx1 rol17-2, confirming the absence of properly spliced mRNA, whereas transcript abundance was not affected in lrx1 rol17-1 (Fig. 2B). All samples were free from contaminating genomic DNA, which results in a larger band owing to the presence of intronic sequence, and primers for ACTIN2 (used as an internal standard) produced a strong band, confirming that RNA extraction and reverse transcription were successful in all samples.

Mutations in ROL17 affect root growth and epidermal cell elongation and cause hyposensitivity to AZD-8055

To compare the two rol17 alleles in the LRX1 wild-type background, the lrx1 rol17-1 mutant was crossed with Col. In the F2 generation, plants with a short-root rol17 mutant phenotype homozygous for wild-type LRX1 were selected. Again, separation of either α/β-hyd or fmo1 from rol17-1 was not achieved, and rol17-1 thus contains also these two mutations (Table 2). For the subsequent analyses, the qrt1-2 mutant was used as the control for rol17-2 because this SAIL T-DNA insertion line was produced in the qrt1-2 mutant background (Sessions et al., 2002). The short-root phenotype of rol17-1 and rol17-2 mutant seedlings (Fig. 3A) was further investigated. To exclude the possibility that the short-root phenotype is caused by a delay in germination, the growth rate of the root was determined in the different lines. Wild-type and rol17 mutant seedlings were germinated and grown for 3 days, and the progression of the root tip was followed in the following 48 h. As shown in Fig. 3B, seedlings of both rol17 alleles showed a reduced growth rate, indicating that root elongation, and not a defect in germination, causes the short-root phenotype. Measurements of epidermal cell length revealed a reduction in cell elongation in the mutants compared with the wild type (Fig. 3C), which is consistent with the reduced root growth of the rol17 mutant seedlings. Interestingly, this impaired cell growth was not observed in root hairs, which were of comparable length in all lines (Fig. 3D).

AZD-8055 sensitivity was tested in the wild type and the two rol17 alleles to confirm that mutations in this locus cause the hyposensitivity to the TOR inhibitor observed in the originally identified lrx1 rol17 mutant. When seedlings were grown in the presence of increasing concentrations of AZD-8055, a weaker growth reduction was demonstrated in both rol17-1 and rol17-2 compared with their wild type (Col and qrt1-2, respectively) in the presence of the TOR inhibitor (Fig. 4A). At low concentrations of AZD-8055, both rol17 alleles showed the absence of growth reduction and, rather, an increase in root length, which was particularly pronounced in rol17-1. In terms of absolute root length, the wild-type lines had longer roots than the rol17 alleles only at lower AZD-8055 concentrations, and root lengths were comparable to those of the rol17 alleles at 0.4 μM AZD-8055 or higher concentrations (Fig. 4B). This observation confirms that mutations in rol17 cause altered sensitivity to the inhibition of the TOR kinase, indicative of a change in the TOR signaling network.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

rol17 mutations cause hyposensitivity to AZD-8055. Seedlings were grown for 8 days in vertical orientation on MS medium containing increasing concentrations of AZD-8055. (A) Change in root length, expressed as a percentage of root length in seedlings grown in medium lacking AZD-8055, and reduced sensitivity to AZD-8055 due to rol17 mutations. (B) Absolute root lengths of the same seedlings analyzed in (A). At higher concentrations, all three lines have comparable root length. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the rol17 mutants and their respective wild types (P<0.01; t-test, n>30). Error bars represent SEM.

Metabolomic alterations in rol17 mutants

IPMS1 is involved in Leu biosynthesis, converting 2-oxoisovalerate to 2-isopropylmalate (de Kraker et al., 2007). To test whether a mutation in rol17 would change the accumulation of Leu and possibly other metabolites, a metabolomic analysis on 236 compounds (Clement et al., 2018), including all amino acids, was performed on wild-type and rol17-1 seedlings. For this purpose, plants were grown on HG medium, which is less rich in nutrients (Barberon et al., 2008) than MS medium. The reduced root developmental phenotypes of both rol17 alleles were also observed under these conditions (Fig. 5A). Only a few unambiguously identified metabolites showed significant divergence (≥2-fold change, P≤0.05) in accumulation between the two lines, among which valine (Val) was the only amino acid (Fig. 5B), comparable to previous findings (Field et al., 2004; de Kraker et al., 2007). Among the other metabolites identified, galactinol, glycerate, and pipecolate have previously been found to be influenced by the TOR network (Ren et al., 2012; Caldana et al., 2013). No significant difference in Leu content was observed between the wild type and rol17-1 (1.14-fold reduction, P=0.06; Supplementary Table S1). There are differing reports on the effect of mutations in IPMS1 on Leu accumulation, with no change or reduced Leu content compared to the wild type observed (Field et al., 2004; de Kraker et al., 2007).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

rol17-1 alleles show changes in metabolite accumulation. (A) After being grown for 8 days in vertical orientation on HG medium, rol17 mutants show reduced growth compared with the wild type (P<0.01; t-test, n>20). (B) Metabolites showing significant change in the rol17-1 seedlings compared with the wild type. Criteria of more than 2-fold change and a significance threshold of P≤0.05 (n=5) were applied. Raw data on all metabolites tested can be found in Supplementary Table S1. (C) Total Leu content in seedlings grown for 8 days on MS medium. Leu was extracted from whole seedlings and quantification was done by LC-MS. The area under the peaks was used for quantification. Error bars represent SEM; different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (P≤0.001; t-test, n=4).

As the plants used for these analyses were grown in different ways, we wanted to investigate whether nutrient availability might influence Leu accumulation. Wild-type, rol17-1, and rol17-2 seedlings were grown in parallel on MS and HG media, and their Leu levels were determined. A difference in Leu content between the wild type and the rol17 mutant seedlings could be detected only in seedlings grown on MS medium (Fig. 5C). Previous studies have shown that the exogenous application of Val interferes with plant growth (Wu et al., 1994). To test whether the suppression of lrx1 is related to the increased Val level observed in the ipms1 mutants (in this study and Field et al., 2004; de Kraker et al., 2007), wild-type Col and lrx1 mutant seedlings were grown on MS medium supplemented with increasing concentrations of Val. While Val induced the expected reduction in growth, the lrx1 mutant phenotype was not altered at any Val concentration (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The lrx1 mutant phenotype is not influenced by Val. Wild-type Col and lrx1 mutant seedlings were grown in vertical orientation for 7 days on MS medium supplemented with 250 μM Val. The lrx1 mutant phenotype developed unchanged under these conditions. Bar=0.5 mm.

Discussion

Amino acid homeostasis is a crucial factor for coordinating growth processes with the nutrient status of the cell. Leu is a branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) that is produced from pyruvate in a series of enzymatic steps, most of which are shared with the synthesis of the BCAA Val (Galili et al., 2016). Several enzymes encoded by the Arabidopsis genome have been identified to possess IPMS activity, including IPMS1 and IPMS2 (also referred to as MAML4 and MAML3, respectively) (Field et al., 2004; de Kraker et al., 2007). The two enzymes seem not to be completely redundant, because mutating IPMS1 in rol17 mutants causes conditional Leu deficiency. The wild type accumulates more Leu under nutrient-rich conditions, under which the general metabolism is likely to be higher and thus a sufficient supply of the amino acid pool is more critical.

In rol17-1, a Pro residue in the catalytic domain is changed to Leu (Supplementary Fig. S3). The strong conservation of this residue among plant IPMS proteins suggests that it is important for their enzymatic activity. This is supported by the very similar phenotypes seen with rol17-2, which lacks the C-terminal end of the protein and whose mRNA is reduced compared to the wild type. Previously, a third ipms1 allele was analyzed with a T-DNA insertion in the seventh intron and no remaining mRNA detectable, representing a knockout allele (de Kraker et al., 2007). Different groups have used different T-DNA insertion lines and the knockout allele does not have the strongest impact on the Leu pool (Field et al., 2004; de Kraker et al., 2007). This points to the possibility that growth conditions have a significant influence on Leu accumulation and possibly other metabolic activities.

The rol17 phenotypes are not induced by changes in Leu content

The most striking phenotype of both rol17 alleles characterized here is a significant reduction in root growth (Fig. 3). This is at least partially explained by reduced cell expansion resulting in shorter cells, as exemplified by the decreased length of trichoblasts. Interestingly, root hair structures clearly do not show this reduced cell growth, indicating that the regulation of expansion of the root hair proper is distinct from the part integrated in the epidermis. The reduced root growth phenotype of the rol17 mutants is observed independent of whether the Leu content is affected (as in MS-grown seedlings) or comparable in the wild type and rol17 mutant lines (as in HG-grown seedlings), suggesting that the defect in plant growth cannot be simply explained by limited Leu availability. For the same reason, the function of Leu as a regulatory metabolite that mediates the regulation of gene expression (Hannah et al., 2010) seems not to be of primary relevance here. Overexpression of the IPMS1 homolog of Brassica in Arabidopsis does not induce increased amounts of Leu, possibly because of an autoregulatory feedback loop involving the C-terminal domain of the protein (Hagelstein and Schultz, 1993; Curien et al., 2008; de Kraker and Gershenzon, 2011), but causes strong dwarfism in transgenic seedlings (Field et al., 2006). This suggests that IPMS1-type proteins influence plant growth independent of their enzymatic activity.

The TOR network is affected by the rol17 mutations

Considering the importance of sensing nutrient availability and levels of metabolites, including amino acids, the TOR network is potentially a target mechanism by which IPMS1 might influence plant development. One well-studied activity is the control of translational activities (Leith and Hall, 2011; Laxman et al., 2013; Schepetilnikov et al., 2013). These are influenced by mRNA abundance but are also particularly dependent on amino acid availability. In animal cells, Leu and Glu influence TOR activity involving Rag-GTPases (Jewell et al., 2015). The TOR network senses and influences amino acid homeostasis (Dobrenel et al., 2016a) by modifying amino acid transport (Nicklin et al., 2009) and protein turnover via autophagy (Liu and Bassham, 2010). Accordingly, altering TOR signaling by using RNAi constructs or treatment with the TOR inhibitor rapamycin also affects the abundance of amino acids including Leu (Moreau et al., 2012; Ren et al., 2012; Caldana et al., 2013). In turn, it is conceivable that mutations affecting enzymes in amino acid metabolism have an effect on TOR signaling by altering translational activity. The hypothesis that mutations in rol17 modulate plant development by influencing TOR signaling is supported by the observation that both rol17 mutants characterized here show hyposensitivity to the TOR kinase inhibitor AZD-8055 (Figs 1B and 4). A change in sensitivity to TOR inhibitors has been used successfully as a selection criterion in genetic screens to identify components of the TOR network (Chan et al., 2000; Li et al., 2015), and our work provides evidence of such a role for IPMS1. This is further substantiated by the metabolomic analysis, which revealed few changes in rol17-1 compared with the wild type. Among the seven compounds found to have significantly altered abundance between the wild type and rol17-1 (Fig. 5B), galactinol, glycerate, and pipecolate have previously been identified as being regulated by the TOR network and show altered accumulation upon the inhibition of TOR activity (Moreau et al., 2012; Ren et al., 2012; Caldana et al., 2013). The metabolic significance of the different metabolites is not always clear. For Val, the increase has also been observed with other ipms1 mutants (Field et al., 2004; de Kraker et al., 2007) and can be explained by the redirection of the metabolic flux toward Val, which shares a large part of its biosynthetic pathway with Leu. Val and other BCAAs have a negative effect on root growth by inhibiting acetohydroxy acid synthase, the first common enzyme of the BCAA biosynthetic pathway (Wu et al., 1994; Chen et al., 2010). However, suppression of lrx1 by rol17 mutations is most likely not linked to the increased Val content, since the addition of Val to the growth medium did not suppress the lrx1 root hair phenotype (Fig. 6). Galactinol is a precursor of raffinose-type oligosaccharides that are partly a means to transport sugar within the plant and have a major task as osmoprotectants (i.e. under cold stress; Peters and Keller, 2009; Egert et al., 2013). Among other mechanisms, the TOR network has been shown to be important for osmotic stress responses (Deprost et al., 2007), providing an explanation why it regulates the abundance of intermediary metabolites of these oligosaccharides.

Together with other amino acids, BCAA intermediates can be starting points for the biosynthesis of glucosinolates (GSLs), a group of sulfur- and nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites present in Brassicaceae, with over 40 different compounds in Arabidopsis (Field et al., 2004). Upon wounding, GSLs can be metabolized by myrosinases, resulting in the accumulation of bioactive molecules with functions in defense against herbivores and pathogens (Bednarek et al., 2009; Clay et al., 2009; Kissen et al., 2009; Bones et al., 2015). GSLs and their degradation products also appear to be endogenous signals that influence plant development by modifying auxin perception, flowering time, the circadian clock, and by inhibiting plant growth (Kerwin et al., 2011; Jensen et al., 2015; Francisco et al., 2016; Urbancsok et al., 2017). A recent study revealed that the GSL 3-hydroxypropylglucosinolate influences plant development by interfering with the TOR network and has partly redundant activities with the TOR kinase inhibitor AZD-8055 (Malinovsky et al., 2017). This presents a possible alternative way by which ROL17/IPMS1 might influence the TOR network. Our non-exhaustive metabolome analysis did not include GSLs, but a previous analysis did not reveal changes in GSLs in an ipms1 mutant (Field et al., 2004). In addition, several GSL degradation products (8MTO, 4MTB, nonanenitrile) were detected in our analysis and were not found to be altered by the rol17-1 mutation. Hence, at this point, we do not have evidence that GSL metabolism would be changed by the rol17 mutations and thus responsible for the observed alteration of the TOR network. However, a more detailed analysis of more metabolites in a larger sample size is required to draw a final conclusion on this point.

Suppression of the lrx1 root hair defect by the rol17 mutations (Fig. 2A) can be explained by the known effect of the TOR network on the expression of cell wall-related genes (Caldana et al., 2013), cell wall architecture, and cell wall development (Leiber et al., 2010). Since the TOR network is active in probably all cell types of an organism, the alteration in AZD-8055 sensitivity observed in the root growth of rol17 mutants reflects a modified TOR network that is likely to affect root hair cells as well. For the coordination of the diverse mechanisms leading to cell growth, plants must regulate cell-wall-modulating activities, since cell wall expansion is a rate-limiting step in turgor-driven cell growth (Cosgrove, 2014). Previous work has shown that lrx1 is suppressed by modifying TOR signaling (Leiber et al., 2010), which has been confirmed in the present study with AZD-8055 suppressing the lrx1 mutant phenotype (Fig. 1A). The TOR network can be significantly altered by proteins that are not directly implicated in the TOR signal transduction pathway but in a process that is under the influence of the TOR network. Several mutations blocking tRNA thiolation, which affects translational activity (Laxman et al., 2013; Nedialkova and Leidel, 2015) and modifies the TOR network (Goehring et al., 2003; Leidel et al., 2009), cause suppression of lrx1 (Leiber et al., 2010; John et al., 2014; Philipp et al., 2014). The exact mechanism by which the TOR network influences the lrx1 mutant phenotype remains to be demonstrated. LRX-type proteins have recently been identified as extracellular receptors of RALF peptides (Mecchia et al., 2017) and seem to work in a process involving the FERONIA receptor kinase (Escobar-Restrepo et al., 2007; Haruta et al., 2014; Dünser et al., 2018, Preprint). Downstream signaling of FERONIA involves the GTP-binding protein ROP2 (Duan et al., 2010), which has recently been shown to influence TOR signaling and to physically interact with the TOR kinase (Schepetilnikov et al., 2017). These findings lead to an emerging picture of a possible connection between LRX1, FERONIA, and the TOR network that will be the subject of future investigations.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online

Fig. S1. wakl4 does not suppress lrx1.

Fig. S2. Root growth of T-DNA knockout lines of rol17 candidate genes.

Fig. S3. IPMS1 protein comparison among different species.

Table S1. Raw data of metabolomic analysis.

Table S2. Primers used to identify the EMS polymorphisms.

Table S3. Primers used to identify the T-DNA mutations alleles.

Table S4. Primers used for RT–PCR.

Supplementary Figures S1-S3
Supplementary Table S1

Acknowledgements

The Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin benefits from the support of the LabEx Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS (grant no. ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS). This work was funded by the PSC – Syngenta Research Fellowship Program and the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 31003A_166577/1 to CR).

Glossary

Abbreviations

BCAA

branched-chain amino acid

EMS

ethyl methanesulfonate

GSL

glucosinolate

HG

Hoagland

IPMS1

isopropylmalate synthase 1

Leu

leucine

LRX

leucine-rich repeat extensin

MS

Murashige and Skoog

rol

repressor of lrx1

TOR

Target of Rapamycin

Val

valine.

References

  1. Ahn CS, Han JA, Lee HS, Lee S, Pai HS. 2011. The PP2A regulatory subunit Tap46, a component of the TOR signaling pathway, modulates growth and metabolism in plants. The Plant Cell 23, 185–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, et al. 2003. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301, 653–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson GH, Veit B, Hanson MR. 2005. The Arabidopsis AtRaptor genes are essential for post-embryonic plant growth. BMC Biology 3, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barberon M, Berthomieu P, Clairotte M, Shibagaki N, Davidian JC, Gosti F. 2008. Unequal functional redundancy between the two Arabidopsis thaliana high-affinity sulphate transporters SULTR1;1 and SULTR1;2. New Phytologist 180, 608–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumberger N, Ringli C, Keller B. 2001. The chimeric leucine-rich repeat/extensin cell wall protein LRX1 is required for root hair morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes & Development 15, 1128–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumberger N, Steiner M, Ryser U, Keller B, Ringli C. 2003. Synergistic interaction of the two paralogous Arabidopsis genes LRX1 and LRX2 in cell wall formation during root hair development. The Plant Journal 35, 71–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bednarek P, Pislewska-Bednarek M, Svatos A, et al. 2009. A glucosinolate metabolism pathway in living plant cells mediates broad-spectrum antifungal defense. Science 323, 101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bones AM, Hara M, Rossiter JT, Kissen R. 2015. Editorial: physiology and cellular mechanisms of isothiocyanates and other glucosinolate degradation products in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldana C, Li Y, Leisse A, Zhang Y, Bartholomaeus L, Fernie AR, Willmitzer L, Giavalisco P. 2013. Systemic analysis of inducible target of rapamycin mutants reveal a general metabolic switch controlling growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 73, 897–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chan TF, Carvalho J, Riles L, Zheng XFS. 2000. A chemical genomics approach toward understanding the global functions of the target of rapamycin protein (TOR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 13227–13232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen H, Saksa K, Zhao F, Qiu J, Xiong L. 2010. Genetic analysis of pathway regulation for enhancing branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis in plants. The Plant Journal 63, 573–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen P, Umeda M. 2015. DNA double-strand breaks induce the expression of flavin-containing monooxygenase and reduce root meristem size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes to Cells 20, 636–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chresta CM, Davies BR, Hickson I, et al. 2010. AZD8055 is a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor with in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Research 70, 288–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clay NK, Adio AM, Denoux C, Jander G, Ausubel FM. 2009. Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innate immune response. Science 323, 95–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Clément G, Moison M, Soulay F, Reisdorf-Cren M, Masclaux-Daubresse C. 2018. Metabolomics of laminae and midvein during leaf senescence and source-sink metabolite management in Brassica napus L. leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 891–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cosgrove DJ. 2014. Plant cell growth and elongation. eLS. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0001688.pub2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Curien G, Biou V, Mas-Droux C, Robert-Genthon M, Ferrer JL, Dumas R. 2008. Amino acid biosynthesis: new architectures in allosteric enzymes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 46, 325–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Kraker JW, Gershenzon J. 2011. From amino acid to glucosinolate biosynthesis: protein sequence changes in the evolution of methylthioalkylmalate synthase in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 23, 38–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Kraker JW, Luck K, Textor S, Tokuhisa JG, Gershenzon J. 2007. Two Arabidopsis genes (IPMS1 and IPMS2) encode isopropylmalate synthase, the branchpoint step in the biosynthesis of leucine. Plant Physiology 143, 970–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Deprost D, Truong HN, Robaglia C, Meyer C. 2005. An Arabidopsis homolog of RAPTOR/KOG1 is essential for early embryo development. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 326, 844–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Deprost D, Yao L, Sormani R, Moreau M, Leterreux G, Nicolaï M, Bedu M, Robaglia C, Meyer C. 2007. The Arabidopsis TOR kinase links plant growth, yield, stress resistance and mRNA translation. EMBO Reports 8, 864–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Diet A, Link B, Seifert GJ, Schellenberg B, Wagner U, Pauly M, Reiter WD, Ringli C. 2006. The Arabidopsis root hair cell wall formation mutant lrx1 is suppressed by mutations in the RHM1 gene encoding a UDP-L-rhamnose synthase. The Plant Cell 18, 1630–1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dobrenel T, Caldana C, Hanson J, Robaglia C, Vincentz M, Veit B, Meyer C. 2016a. TOR signaling and nutrient sensing. Annual Review of Plant Biology 67, 261–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dobrenel T, Mancera-Martínez E, Forzani C, et al. 2016b. The Arabidopsis TOR kinase specifically regulates the expression of nuclear genes coding for plastidic ribosomal proteins and the phosphorylation of the cytosolic ribosomal protein S6. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Draeger C, Ndinyanka Fabrice T, Gineau E, et al. 2015. Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat extensin (LRX) proteins modify cell wall composition and influence plant growth. BMC Plant Biology 15, 155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Duan Q, Kita D, Li C, Cheung AY, Wu HM. 2010. FERONIA receptor-like kinase regulates RHO GTPase signaling of root hair development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 17821–17826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dünser K, Gupta S, Ringli C, Kleine-Vehn J. 2018. LRX- and FER-dependent extracellular sensing coordinates vacuolar size for cytosol homeostasis. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/231043. Preprint. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Egert A, Keller F, Peters S. 2013. Abiotic stress-induced accumulation of raffinose in Arabidopsis leaves is mediated by a single raffinose synthase (RS5, At5g40390). BMC Plant Biology 13, 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Escobar-Restrepo JM, Huck N, Kessler S, Gagliardini V, Gheyselinck J, Yang WC, Grossniklaus U. 2007. The FERONIA receptor-like kinase mediates male-female interactions during pollen tube reception. Science 317, 656–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fabrice TN, Vogler H, Draeger C, Munglani G, Gupta S, Herger AG, Knox P, Grossniklaus U, Ringli C. 2018. LRX proteins play a crucial role in pollen grain and pollen tube cell wall development. Plant Physiology 176, 1981–1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fiehn O, Wohlgemuth G, Scholz M, Kind T, Lee DY, Lu Y, Moon S, Nikolau B. 2008. Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI-compliant studies. The Plant Journal 53, 691–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Field B, Cardon G, Traka M, Botterman J, Vancanneyt G, Mithen R. 2004. Glucosinolate and amino acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 135, 828–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Field B, Furniss C, Wilkinson A, Mithen R. 2006. Expression of a Brassica isopropylmalate synthase gene in Arabidopsis perturbs both glucosinolate and amino acid metabolism. Plant Molecular Biology 60, 717–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Francisco M, Joseph B, Caligagan H, Li BH, Corwin JA, Lin C, Kerwin R, Burow M, Kliebenstein DJ. 2016. The defense metabolite, allyl glucosinolate, modulates Arabidopsis thaliana biomass dependent upon the endogenous glucosinolate pathway. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD. 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 13, 207–209. [Google Scholar]
  36. Galili G, Amir R, Fernie AR. 2016. The regulation of essential amino acid synthesis and accumulation in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 67, 153–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Goehring AS, Rivers DM, Sprague GF Jr. 2003. Urmylation: a ubiquitin-like pathway that functions during invasive growth and budding in yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell 14, 4329–4341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hagelstein P, Schultz G. 1993. Leucine synthesis in spinach chloroplasts: partial characterization of 2-isopropylmalate synthase. Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler 374, 1105–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hannah MA, Caldana C, Steinhauser D, Balbo I, Fernie AR, Willmitzer L. 2010. Combined transcript and metabolite profiling of Arabidopsis grown under widely variant growth conditions facilitates the identification of novel metabolite-mediated regulation of gene expression. Plant Physiology 152, 2120–2129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Haruta M, Sabat G, Stecker K, Minkoff BB, Sussman MR. 2014. A peptide hormone and its receptor protein kinase regulate plant cell expansion. Science 343, 408–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Huang S, Bjornsti MA, Houghton PJ. 2003. Rapamycins: mechanism of action and cellular resistance. Cancer Biology & Therapy 2, 222–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jensen LM, Jepsen HSK, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ, Burow M. 2015. Natural variation in cross-talk between glucosinolates and onset of flowering in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jewell JL, Kim YC, Russell RC, Yu FX, Park HW, Plouffe SW, Tagliabracci VS, Guan KL. 2015. Metabolism. Differential regulation of mTORC1 by leucine and glutamine. Science 347, 194–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. John F, Philipp M, Leiber RM, Errafi S, Ringli C. 2014. Ubiquitin-related modifiers of Arabidopsis thaliana influence root development. PLoS One 9, e86862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kerwin RE, Jimenez-Gomez JM, Fulop D, Harmer SL, Maloof JN, Kliebenstein DJ. 2011. Network quantitative trait loci mapping of circadian clock outputs identifies metabolic pathway-to-clock linkages in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 23, 471–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kissen R, Rossiter JT, Bones AM. 2009. The ‘mustard oil bomb’: not so easy to assemble! Localization, expression and distribution of the components of the myrosinase enzyme system. Phytochemistry Reviews 8, 69–86. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kopka J, Schauer N, Krueger S, et al. 2005. GMD@CSB.DB: the Golm Metabolome Database. Bioinformatics 21, 1635–1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. 2012. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 149, 274–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Laxman S, Sutter BM, Wu X, Kumar S, Guo X, Trudgian DC, Mirzaei H, Tu BP. 2013. Sulfur amino acids regulate translational capacity and metabolic homeostasis through modulation of tRNA thiolation. Cell 154, 416–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Leiber RM, John F, Verhertbruggen Y, Diet A, Knox JP, Ringli C. 2010. The TOR pathway modulates the structure of cell walls in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 22, 1898–1908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Leidel S, Pedrioli PG, Bucher T, Brost R, Costanzo M, Schmidt A, Aebersold R, Boone C, Hofmann K, Peter M. 2009. Ubiquitin-related modifier Urm1 acts as a sulphur carrier in thiolation of eukaryotic transfer RNA. Nature 458, 228–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li L, Song Y, Wang K, Dong P, Zhang X, Li F, Li Z, Ren M. 2015. TOR-inhibitor insensitive-1 (TRIN1) regulates cotyledons greening in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu Q, Wang J, Kang SA, Thoreen CC, Hur W, Ahmed T, Sabatini DM, Gray NS. 2011. Discovery of 9-(6-aminopyridin-3-yl)-1-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)benzo[h][1,6]naphthyridin-2(1H)-one (Torin2) as a potent, selective, and orally available mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor for treatment of cancer. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 54, 1473–1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu Y, Bassham DC. 2010. TOR is a negative regulator of autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 5, e11883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Leith R, Hall MN. 2011. Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics 189, 1177–1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mahfouz MM, Kim S, Delauney AJ, Verma DP. 2006. Arabidopsis TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN interacts with RAPTOR, which regulates the activity of S6 kinase in response to osmotic stress signals. The Plant Cell 18, 477–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Malinovsky FG, Thomsen MLF, Nintemann SJ, Jagd LM, Bourgine B, Burow M, Kliebenstein DJ. 2017. An evolutionarily young defense metabolite influences the root growth of plants via the ancient TOR signaling pathway. Elife 6, 29353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Martelli AM, Buontempo F, McCubrey JA. 2018. Drug discovery targeting the mTOR pathway. Clinical Science 132, 543–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mecchia MA, Santos-Fernandez G, Duss NN, et al. 2017. RALF4/19 peptides interact with LRX proteins to control pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. Science 358, 1600–1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Menand B, Desnos T, Nussaume L, Berger F, Bouchez D, Meyer C, Robaglia C. 2002. Expression and disruption of the Arabidopsis TOR (target of rapamycin) gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 6422–6427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Montané MH, Menand B. 2013. ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitors delay plant growth by triggering early differentiation of meristematic cells but no developmental patterning change. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 4361–4374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Moreau M, Azzopardi M, Clément G, et al. 2012. Mutations in the Arabidopsis homolog of LST8/GβL, a partner of the target of rapamycin kinase, impair plant growth, flowering, and metabolic adaptation to long days. The Plant Cell 24, 463–481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nedialkova DD, Leidel SA. 2015. Optimization of codon translation rates via tRNA modifications maintains proteome integrity. Cell 161, 1606–1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nicklin P, Bergman P, Zhang B, et al. 2009. Bidirectional transport of amino acids regulates mTOR and autophagy. Cell 136, 521–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Peters S, Keller F. 2009. Frost tolerance in excised leaves of the common bugle (Ajuga reptans L.) correlates positively with the concentrations of raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs). Plant, Cell & Environment 32, 1099–1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Philipp M, John F, Ringli C. 2014. The cytosolic thiouridylase CTU2 of Arabidopsis thaliana is essential for posttranscriptional thiolation of tRNAs and influences root development. BMC Plant Biology 14, 109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ren M, Venglat P, Qiu S, et al. 2012. Target of rapamycin signaling regulates metabolism, growth, and life span in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 24, 4850–4874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Schepetilnikov M, Dimitrova M, Mancera-Martínez E, Geldreich A, Keller M, Ryabova LA. 2013. TOR and S6K1 promote translation reinitiation of uORF-containing mRNAs via phosphorylation of eIF3h. The EMBO Journal 32, 1087–1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schepetilnikov M, Makarian J, Srour O, Geldreich A, Yang Z, Chicher J, Hammann P, Ryabova LA. 2017. GTPase ROP2 binds and promotes activation of target of rapamycin, TOR, in response to auxin. The EMBO Journal 36, 886–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sessions A, Burke E, Presting G, et al. 2002. A high-throughput Arabidopsis reverse genetics system. The Plant Cell 14, 2985–2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sormani R, Yao L, Menand B, Ennar N, Lecampion C, Meyer C, Robaglia C. 2007. Saccharomyces cerevisiae FKBP12 binds Arabidopsis thaliana TOR and its expression in plants leads to rapamycin susceptibility. BMC Plant Biology 7, 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Stegmann M, Monaghan J, Smakowska-Luzan E, Rovenich H, Lehner A, Holton N, Belkhadir Y, Zipfel C. 2017. The receptor kinase FER is a RALF-regulated scaffold controlling plant immune signaling. Science 355, 287–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Urbancsok J, Bones AM, Kissen R. 2017. Glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates inhibit Arabidopsis growth and the potency depends on their side chain structure. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, 2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wu K, Mourad G, King J. 1994. A valine-resistant mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana displays an acetolactate synthase with altered feedback-control. Planta 192, 249–255. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou Y, Zhou B, Chen K, Yan SF, King FJ, Jiang S, Winzeler EA. 2007. Large-scale annotation of small-molecule libraries using public databases. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 47, 1386–1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures S1-S3
Supplementary Table S1

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES