Skip to main content
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA logoLink to Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
. 2019 Apr 1;107(2):289–290. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.664

Correction

PMCID: PMC6466503  PMID: 31019398

VOLUME 104

104(1) January, page 49

El Sherif R, Pluye P, Gore G, Granikov V, Hong QN. Performance of a mixed filter to identify relevant studies for mixed studies reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan;104(1):47–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.007.

The totals in Table 1, Number of relevant records retrieved and Number of nonrelevant records not retrieved by the filter, should be 1,776 and 1,398, rather than 1,176 and 1,396, respectively. The corresponding total number of records identified in the study should be 4,546, rather than 4,547.

Corrected Table 1.

Performance of the mixed filter

graphic file with name jmla-107-289-t001a.jpg

graphic file with name jmla-107-289-t001b.jpg

Journal Number of relevant records retrieved (a*) Number of relevant records not retrieved by filter (b*) Number of nonrelevant records retrieved by the filter (c*) Number of nonrelevant records not retrieved by the filter (d*) Precision (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Discipline 1: Primary Care
High IF:
Ann Fam Med 294 21 78 254 79.0 93.3 76.5
Low IF:
J Fam Pract 23 2 492 402 4.5 92.0 45.0
Discipline 2: Public Health and Epidemiology
High IF:
Int J Epi 488 9 317 495 60.6 98.2 61.0
Low IF:
Palliative Med 291 26 162 142 64.2 91.8 46.2
Discipline 3: Medical Informatics
High IF:
Overall
6 included journals 1,776 208 1,164 1,398 60.4% 89.5% 54.5%

IF=impact factor.

*

Legend:

High precision ≥ 50%=a:(a+c)

High sensitivity ≥ 80%=a:(a+b)

High specificity ≥ 50%=d:(c+d)

a=relevant records retrieved; b=relevant records not retrieved; c=nonrelevant records retrieved; d= nonrelevant records not retrieved.


Articles from Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES