Summary
Introduction
Reproductive age women, particularly low‐income and minority women, are at risk for obesity. As an integral service provider for these women, the US Department of Agriculture Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children is uniquely positioned to refine its focus and efforts.
Methods
Strategies for accomplishing this goal include identifying pregnant, inter‐partum and post‐partum women in need of targeted patient‐centred services including education, counselling and support to address weight loss or appropriate gestational weight gain.
Results
These services may include calorie‐controlled diets, behavioural strategies, alternative methods of education delivery and extending post‐partum benefits. Implementation of these strategies is feasible through collaboration with related government subsidized programs and reallocation of funds, staff and other resources.
Conclusions
Given the magnitude of the problem and the adverse outcomes that obesity has on health and quality of life, Women, Infants, and Children can more positively impact the lives of our most vulnerable families, which face an obesogenic environment.
Keywords: Obesity, periconception, weight management, WIC
The problem of maternal obesity and the unprecedented position of Women, Infants, and Children to intervene
The US Department of Agriculture Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) was established to safeguard the health of low income at risk pregnant, post‐partum and breastfeeding women and infants and children up until the age of 5. WIC was conceived and established as a pilot when childhood and prenatal hunger among the low‐income population was recognized to be a critical problem in the USA. Currently, more than 40 years since its inception, WIC operates in every state in the USA and Puerto Rico. It is well documented that WIC has enhanced certain aspects of nutrition for pregnant women, infants, post‐partum and breastfeeding women and children up to the age of 5 by providing healthy foods, nutritional education and counselling, breastfeeding support and referrals to other health and social services 1.
The face of malnutrition, however, has shifted from one of insufficient nutritional intake due to low‐calorie intake to insufficient nutrient intake due to excessive caloric intake contributing to the national epidemic of obesity. More than one‐third of women in the USA are obese, and more than one half of pregnant women are overweight or obese 2. Pregnancy and the post‐partum period are critical nutritional time points that influence the immediate and long‐term health of both the mother and child. While the health and nutritional status of women prior to pregnancy is now arguably the most important to long‐term health outcomes, the nutritional status of women during pregnancy including gestational weight gain influences birth outcomes, health and long‐term risk for chronic disease 3. Currently, only one‐third of pregnant women gain the amount of weight recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to minimize risks for adverse outcomes in the mother (e.g. gestational diabetes, pregnancy‐induced hypertension and medically indicated caesarean sections) and neonate (e.g. preterm birth, large or small for gestational age, congenital anomalies and infant mortality) 4, 5, 6. Excess weight gain in pregnancy leads to increased post‐partum weight retention, which averages 3.3–5.5 lb with 20% of women retaining at least 11 lb 6–18 months post‐partum. At 24 months, 50% of obese women retain ≥11 lb of pregnancy weight gain 6, 7. Excessive weight retention leads to gradually increasing body mass index (BMI) and health risks, as well as likely complications in future pregnancies.
Low‐income minority women are at particular risk of obesity, and the prevalence of obesity is increasing most significantly among African–American and Hispanic women, with the highest prevalence of 50% occurring in African–American women 8. Consequently, these populations are especially vulnerable to obesity‐related chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and certain cancers, all which impact quality of life as well as increasing government spending on elevated healthcare costs 9. The obesity epidemic in the low‐income WIC population suggests that a realignment of policy governing the provision of WIC services is needed not only to improve nutrition and overall health but also to specifically address overweight and obesity.
Of over 6 million pregnancies in the USA each year, the WIC program provides service for approximately 15%, and more than 50% of pregnant women enrol in WIC during their first trimester 10. An average first‐time mother will enrol in WIC during her first trimester of pregnancy and will remain engaged with the WIC program until that child is 5 years of age 8. With an average inter‐pregnancy interval in the USA of 34 months 11, the post‐partum period of one pregnancy is also the prepregnancy period of another, and therefore, the likelihood that a woman will become pregnant again before ending WIC benefits with the enrolled child is high. WIC is therefore well positioned to reach the population most at risk, given that it reaches a sizable percentage of low‐income women and families. The aim of this paper is to highlight the unprecedented opportunity for WIC to contribute to prevention of maternal overweight and obesity. Through its existing four pillars of health and nutrition services, programmatic shifts requiring no additional resources can be accomplished with an allowable change to the Federal mandate. Furthermore, with additional funds, states could request an expansion or redirection in services to better serve the needs of populations in America most vulnerable for over‐nutrition and sedentary behaviours.
Specific recommendations for the proper management of overweight and obesity 12 and gestational weight gain 6 have been developed and are currently being used by healthcare providers. The first guidelines for the treatment of obesity were established in 2014 by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. These guidelines provide specific recommendations for delivery of effective lifestyle modification programs including minimum number for contacts, rate of weight loss and method of delivery to achieve a weight loss efficacy replicated in clinical trials 12. Using these guidelines as a foundation, and considering the economic and personal barriers faced by populations served by WIC, the program can develop an expanded strategy including identifying clients in need of weight management services and extending post‐partum WIC benefits. Moreover, through collaborations with other government‐funded programs to focus on maternal obesity, WIC can consequently improve overall health and reduce chronic diseases in families, starting with mothers. Instituted to guide the development of weight management strategies for pregnant WIC participants are the 2009 IOM guidelines for weight management in pregnancy. These guidelines provide evidence‐based recommendations that reflect the changing US demographics, particularly the surge in overweight and obesity in adults 6.
Four pillars of Women, Infants, and Children service
Women, Infants, and Children provides four pillars of health and nutrition services: healthy food, nutrition education, breastfeeding support and healthcare referrals. Since the inception of WIC as a pilot program in 1972, the adoption of Federal policy and guidance around these key initiatives has led to well‐documented improvements in diet quality 13, 14, decreased rates of anaemia 15, increased rates of breastfeeding 16, 17 and decreased rates of low birth weight infants 18, 19 and neonatal deaths 18, respectively.
Healthy foods
Probably the cornerstone of WIC is to provide nutritious foods to improve the health of women and children who are at nutritional risk. WIC has been receptive to changes in the food environment and undergone numerous structured evaluations to better tailor the food packages for women and infants. For example, in 1992, the WIC Farmers' Market Nutrition Program was established by the US Congress to provide fresh, unprepared, locally grown fruits and vegetables to WIC participants. In fiscal year 2015, 1.7 million WIC participants received food benefits as a result of this program. However, not all State agencies operate the Farmers' Market Nutrition Program on a statewide basis 20.
Congress mandates that an evaluation of the WIC food packages must occur every 10 years. WIC responded to the IOM's 2006 recommendations to align the food packages with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Health People 2020, and to address 30 health objectives including improving adult weight 21. Changes to the food packages based on the 2006 recommendations were successfully implemented in 2009. The IOM revaluated the WIC food packages once again in 2016 and made the following recommendations regarding the mother's food package: (1) increase the dollar amount of the cash value voucher (CVV), add fish and reduce the amounts of juice, milk, legumes and peanut butter, (2) allow CVV substitutions to address individual needs (i.e. cultural preferences and food allergies) and (3) modify WIC food specifications to improve alignment with dietary guidance 21. To enable women receiving WIC food packages to modify their energy intake to successfully gain the recommended amount of weight during pregnancy and lose weight post‐partum, an additional consideration for the existing IOM review panel is to authorize WIC nutritionists to modify food packages to better address the nutritional needs and goals of individual participants. Such modifications may include further reducing or excluding juice and providing CVV substitutions for additional fruit and vegetables, portion‐controlled foods, and meal replacements will aid women in following a calorie‐controlled diet and achieving their weight gain or loss goals.
Nutrition education
Women, Infants, and Children is the only Food and Nutrition Services nutrition assistance program federally mandated to provide nutrition education free to participants. Since its inception in 1999, as a result of two studies that recommended WIC to strengthen nutrition education through a more client‐centred behavioural approach to develop healthy behaviours for life, Revitalizing Quality Nutrition Services continues to evaluate and improve nutrition education within WIC 22. To tailor nutrition services to the individual needs of participants, participants are engaged in prioritizing topics that best meet their needs and interests 23. Each state is responsible for interpreting the nutrition education mandates and implementing a program that fits the needs of their constituents. Often toolkits are developed to help staff deliver nutrition information consistently and effectively to participants. In addition to in‐person education, technologies such as mobile or web‐based programs have been used to enhance information delivery and program management 24.
The weight management recommendations provided by the IOM and the treatment guidelines for obesity align with the WIC education objectives. The first charge issued by the IOM Gestational Weight Gain report is to increase the proportion of women who gain within the 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines. The first step to achieving this goal is to educate women on the weight gain recommendations and to assist women in setting their BMI‐specific gestational weight gain goals. The IOM has developed a Pregnancy Weight Gain Guidelines Toolkit 25 which includes material to aid healthcare professionals to disseminate guidelines and appropriately educate and utilize a weight tracker for individualized weight monitoring. WIC services for weight management would be formalized, universal and led by a trained nutritional professional WIC staff, assisted by other WIC staff. The ideal behavioural weight loss program consists of ≥14 in‐person counselling sessions in 6 months 12. The IOM suggests that charting and discussing weight gain at each patient contact is important. Pregnancy weight gain charts allow assessment of the overall pattern of weight gain in relation to the IOM recommendations and help women to identify if they are on track with the IOM recommendations. WIC clients would be encouraged to track their weight weekly throughout pregnancy using the IOM gestational weight gain tracker. While manually graphing incremental increases in weight may be difficult for some WIC participants, eHealth/mHealth platforms have integrated the IOM gestational weight gain guidelines and eased self‐monitoring through wireless Bluetooth scales and near real‐time, automated graphing (https://www.pbrc.edu/research‐and‐faculty/calculators/gestational‐weight‐gain/). There is emerging evidence that electronically delivered programs (e.g. eHealth or mHealth) that provide near real time and personalized feedback can result in significant weight loss sufficient to return participants to a healthier weight. Telehealth or eHealth strategies will allow for increased contact with HIGH RISK individual through phone, texts or other social media resulting in cost‐effective monitoring, education and support for clients to reach their individualized weight goals. In addition to self‐monitoring weight, other strategies that consistently improve weight management programs and can be integrated into an eHealth/mHealth program include (1) utilization of behaviour change techniques especially those that compare individual's behaviour with others 26, 27, 28; (2) increased counsellor–participant contact 26, 29; and (3) counselling with a dietitian focusing on energy intake 11, 26, 30, 31. There are a few examples now of efficacious eHealth interventions delivered in WIC for management of weight during pregnancy or post‐partum that show promise for wide‐scale testing and dissemination 32, 33, 34, 35, 36.
A recent survey study of almost 650 WIC nutritionists reported that weight gain during pregnancy and prenatal nutrition/diet were topics discussed in 75% of one‐on‐one appointments with pregnant women 23. Interestingly, neither weight gain in pregnancy nor prenatal nutrition was discussed in one‐on‐one sessions observed 37. These data highlight that WIC staff acknowledge the importance of these topics but may need better assistance in delivering new material.
Breastfeeding
In 1992, Congress mandated the provision of breastfeeding education and support to mothers receiving WIC services, and the Loving Support Makes Breastfeeding Work campaign was launched. Periodic additions to WIC program in support of encouraging the establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding include the use of past WIC participants to support women learning to breastfeed through the WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counselor Initiative in 2004, modification of the WIC food package in 2009 to include more healthy foods for breastfeeding mothers and in 2011, an IOM‐led evaluation of the initial Loving Support Makes Breastfeeding Work Campaign to include expansion of the program to technological interfaces such as text messaging. The success of these programs on breastfeeding is clearly evident with more than a 20% increase in the number of WIC infants' breastfed from 1998 to 2010 38.
Breastfeeding rates are associated with maternal BMI. Compared with women of normal body weight, breastfeeding is less likely to be initiated in women with overweight or obesity 39, and obese mothers are less likely to maintain breastfeeding 39, even after adjusting for psychosocial and demographic factors such as social and emotional support, breastfeeding knowledge, behavioural beliefs and confidence 40, 41.
Exclusive breastfeeding expends approximately 500 kcal d−1, which may promote weight loss 42. Studies show that women who have breastfed have lower risks of visceral adiposity, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease 42. Furthermore, breastfeeding, particularly higher intensity breastfeeding (greater proportion of breastfeeding as compared with formula feeding), has also been associated with lower risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus after a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes 43. And for children, in comparison with infants who were never breastfed, breastfed infants have a 12% to 24% reduction in the future risk of overweight/obesity 44. It is important to note that the difference in overweight/obesity risk between breastfed and non‐breastfed infants is also likely influenced by other factors including differences in parental feeding styles 45, 46, the infant pattern of feeding self‐regulation 47, 48 and maternal factors such as sociodemographic characteristics 49 and impaired lactogenesis 41.
Although weight loss is often discouraged during breastfeeding because there is concern that energy restriction may impair lactation performance, studies indicate that weight loss can be safe during breastfeeding. Combining dietary restriction and increased physical activity to promote approximately 500‐kcal d−1 deficit (about 1 lb per week of weight loss), beginning after breastfeeding patterns are stable, can be safely undertaken without affecting the composition of breast milk or infant growth 50, 51.
The programmatic infrastructure of breastfeeding in WIC is solid. The provision of additional education to WIC staff about the vulnerability of women with overweight or obesity for breastfeeding will allow a more focused effort on those WIC mothers who are most likely to not breastfeed at all or to discontinue breastfeeding early.
Referral
Finally, referral to healthcare and social services based on individual client needs identified during the nutrition assessment is the final pillar of WIC. An essential aspect of a successful weight management program is to assess which individuals need intervention. Women not at weight‐related risk (BMI of 18.5 to <30 kg m−2) would receive nutrition education regarding weight and goal setting strategies for adopting a healthful diet and lifestyle habits. However, non‐pregnant participants who have a (1) BMI 25–29.9 kg m−2 and are high risk for cardiovascular disease due to obesity‐related comorbidities (e.g. hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes) or (2) BMI ≥30 kg m−2 would be uniformly labelled as HIGH RISK and receive nutrition education, counselling and support to address weight loss, including a ‘prescription’ for a comprehensive lifestyle program that includes (1) provision of a moderately reduced calorie diet (5–10% weight loss in 6 months), (2) a program of increased physical activity and (3) the use of behavioural strategies to facilitate adherence to a healthier lifestyle. Additional methods for weight loss including pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery are outside of WIC practices, but WIC staff would be knowledgeable of such treatments and be trained to provide appropriate referrals to outside health service providers.
Implications for practice and/or policy
Table 1 proposes how weight management strategies could be integrated into the WIC program and within the four pillars of existing services. Many weight management strategies outlined such as uniformly identifying high‐risk individuals in need of weight management services, measuring and tracking weights on a weight graph in relation to an ideal weight zone based on established recommendations, focusing weight management counselling sessions on energy intake and encouraging behaviour change through motivational interviewing, self‐monitoring, goal setting, etc. can be integrated into the current WIC program without additional resources or significant restructuring beyond the current WIC appropriation. However, although easy to implement, passive programmatic changes such as client education through handouts or brochures may result in health benefits but have a limited effect on weight management 57, 58. New approaches need seamless integration within the WIC clinic without additional burden for the nutritionist to be sustainable 56.
Table 1.
Scalability of successful weight management program characteristics for periconception health in WIC
| WIC program pillar | Recommendations for implementation |
|---|---|
| Healthy foods |
(1) Identify women with a BMI ≥30 kg m−2 as HIGH RISK and flag for weight management services 6, 12, 23.a
(2) Include portion‐controlled foods in WIC food packages for individuals in need of weight management.b |
| Nutrition education |
(3) Provide basic bathroom scale and pedometer for weight and activity tracking 32, 52.b
(4) At each WIC visit, measure weight and plot on a weight gain or weight loss chart showing an ideal weight zone. Counsel WIC client on weight change 12, 23, 25, 37.a (5) Provide opportunities for implementation of a weight management syllabus (i.e. support groups and exercise, cooking and gardening activities).a (6) Provide education on free government‐supported self‐monitoring smartphone apps or other tools 53.a (7) Bolster WIC programs with access to remote services and contacts with WIC staff between visits (email, phone, Internet, smartphone applications, etc.) 54.b |
| Breastfeeding |
(8) Identify women with a BMI ≥30 kg m−2 as HIGH RISK and flag for increased breastfeeding support 40, 41.a
(9) Match peer‐counsellors to breastfeeding mothers with consideration of BMI 55.b |
| Referral |
(10) Evaluate need for weight management services and structure of services at the first pregnancy visit, first post‐partum visit and other weight and life cycle milestones 6, 12, 56.a
(11) Increase frequency of WIC visits for high‐risk individuals to allow for behaviour change interventions 12, 23, 37.b (12) Provide continuity and integration of care and consistent messages through additional government‐subsidized programs (SNAP, HeadStart, community centre, Medicaid providers and community health units, and Nurse Family Partnership Program) 23, 37.b |
Could be implemented within current WIC structure.
Would require shift in focus and reallocation of WIC resources.
BMI, body mass index; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; WIC, Women, Infants, and Children.
More intensive weight management approaches including increased contact (in‐person or remote), extending WIC services to all post‐partum moms to 1 year, allowing for the modification of food packages for inclusion of portion‐controlled foods, and collaboration with related government‐funded programs will require funds to support a feasibility study and then funds beyond the current WIC and government appropriation. Government policies addressing weight management similar to those developed for ensuring a healthy food package and breastfeeding promotion are needed to expand current WIC services and allow WIC to continue its promotion of the optimal health and nutritional status of a population that is particularly at risk for poor pregnancy and post‐partum outcomes.
Approximately 70% of WIC recipients participate in other governmental programs. Participation in qualifying programs such as Medicaid, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program classifies them as income eligible for the WIC program. It is feasible and preferable that WIC collaborates with allied health providers and other government‐funded programs particularly related to nutrition and population health, to assist at risk women by improving their current and future health, as well as that of their children 59. Through collaborations between government‐funded programs, services will no longer be duplicated therefore reducing current government spending and allowing for reallocation of funds to important aspects of weight management programs not currently implemented. According to the Obesity Guidelines, a high‐intensity lifestyle program requires approximately 14 in‐person contacts within a 6‐month period 12. Indeed, WIC participants most often only receive two contacts (more if breastfeeding). Combining government resources including universal participant data records for easy transmittal of health information between the entities allows for a continuity of care and implementation of more efficient and effective weight management programs. The sharing of vital information of WIC recipients between providers will result in a cohesive and integrated plan to provide frequent and targeted healthy lifestyle programs to take advantage of the WIC window of opportunity.
Women, Infants, and Children was recently permitted to expand services in order to tackle childhood obesity. The pilot project Fit WIC was a great success 60. Executed in five states (California, Arizona, Kentucky, Virginia and Vermont), the program confirmed that WIC is indeed positioned to play a key role in efforts to prevent obesity in preschool‐aged children. Collectively, the individual state programs garnered specialized education materials focused on healthy behaviours and lifestyle choices (and not weight) along with staff training and increased time with WIC parents allowed staff to build a stronger rapport with parents and to focus on childhood overweight, parents preferred strategies that involved the entire family, physical activity should be included in nutrition education and assessment, the adoption of wellness opportunities for staff at the workplace fostered more effective health educators and finally stakeholders acknowledge WIC as a community leader and partner in obesity prevention efforts. While several of these initiatives can be realized within the current WIC program structure, it is also acknowledged that WIC would require additional funding to appropriately implement the Fit WIC program uniformly across the country. Nevertheless, these five individual Fit WIC programs highlight the receptivity of the WIC program for expanded services and that the backbone of WIC, being the four pillars are key stepping stones for implementation of an obesity prevention program beginning with the pregnant woman.
In contrast, a pilot study in rural Colorado (HeartSmartMoms) evaluating the feasibility of instituting a system‐level change to include measurement of maternal weight at each post‐partum visit (mother and child) and to discuss maternal health habits with motivational interviewing was not as successful 56. The program relied on use of an established bilingual, interactive health kiosk at WIC appointments 61. The kiosk provided feedback to the mother and WIC counsellor on maternal BMI along with information of associated health risks and tailored recommendations. The information provided by the kiosk would prompt the topics to discuss during one‐on‐one counselling, and the WIC nutritionist would use motivational interviewing to help establish a goal and plan for health behaviour change. Although enrolled participants significantly improved their weight status and reduced intake of sugar‐sweetened beverages 56, uptake of the intervention was low. Only one in every six post‐partum women targeted participated in the new program.
The primary difference between these two programs is the underlying infrastructure in which they were implemented which ultimately affected success. Fit WIC was well supported and implemented statewide, across five states. The HeartSmartMoms program was embedded into three rural clinics in a single state and as a research project. Although, intended to be fully immersed into these clinics, the program was ancillary to existing services. Moreover, WIC staff were responsible for introducing participants to the program and obtaining informed consent. It is not surprising that barriers raised by WIC staff to explain the low enrolment included lack of buy‐in from staff, lack of knowledge regarding the study, resistance to change and lack of time.
These two examples underscore that any new program, even pilot in nature, requires buy‐in from not only staff but also participants. Next steps should include formative research with participatory research models to garner the inputs of all stakeholders. Such an approach should aim to confirm the programmatic focus areas around maternal obesity and approaches to implementation developed with complex barriers for implementation considered.
Conclusion
The WIC program, which was established to tackle issues of maternal and infant undernutrition, serves a population that is particularly vulnerable to societal trends, increased consumption of calorically dense foods and sedentary behaviours. Continued services for these populations would include development and implementation of programs to tackle the issue of excessive caloric intake, overweight and obesity. The WIC program can immediately improve care by uniformly and consistently (1) identifying those in need of weight management, (2) following established weight management guidelines during pregnancy and post‐partum, (3) measuring and graph weights at each appointment and (4) discussing behaviours focused on managing proper energy intake. While working to uniformly adopt current practices, WIC can work with other government‐funded programs to decrease duplicated services and increase the continuum of care allowing reallocation and restructuring of WIC resources to focus on the primary public health concern of this millennium. It is anticipated that the expanded services would defray the staggering healthcare costs associated with management of obese pregnancies (estimated to exceed the cost of care for normal weight pregnancies by 5.4‐ to 16.2‐fold) and the downstream costs of the long‐term management of obesity in children 62.
Funding
This study was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture through UCLA Small Grants Program (T32DK064584) (L. A. G.) and the National Institutes of Health (R01NR017644) (L. M. R.).
Conflict of Interest Statement
No conflict of interest was declared.
Gilmore, L. A. , Augustyn, M. , Gross, S. M. , Vallo, P. M. , Paige, D. M. , and Redman, L. M. (2019) Periconception weight management in the Women, Infants, and Children program. Obesity Science & Practice, 5: 95–102. 10.1002/osp4.327.
References
- 1. Colman S, Nichols‐Barrer IP, Redline JE, Devaney BL, Ansell SV, Joyce T. Effects of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): A Review of Recent Research. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services: Alexandria, VA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among us adults, 1999‐2010. JAMA 2012; 307: 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kaiser L, Allen LH. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Am Diet Assoc 2008; 108: 553–561. 10.1016/j.jada.2008.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Stothard KJ, Tennant PWG, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2009; 301: 636–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dalenius K, Brindley P, Smith B, Reinold C, Grummer‐Strawn L. Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance 2010 Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 6. IOM . Weight gain during pregnancy In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL. (eds). Reexamining the Guidelines. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines: Washington, DC, 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Phillips J, King R, Skouteris H. A conceptual model of psychological predictors of postpartum weight retention. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2012; 30: 278–288. [Google Scholar]
- 8. The Current State of Obesity Solutions in the United States . Workshop Summary. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ogden CL, Lamb MM, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. Obesity and socioeconomic status in adults: United States, 2005‐2008. NCHS Data Brief 2010: 1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Thorn B, Tadler C, Huret N, et al. In: AG‐3198‐C‐11‐0010 PbIPRuCN (ed.). WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2014. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service: Alexandria, VA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hill B, Skouteris H, Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz M. Interventions designed to limit gestational weight gain: a systematic review of theory and meta‐analysis of intervention components. Obes Rev 2013; 14: 435–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation 2014; 129: S102–S138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Andreyeva T, Luedicke J, Middleton AE, Long MW, Schwartz MB. Positive influence of the revised Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children food packages on access to healthy foods. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112: 850–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tester JM, Leung CW, Crawford PB. Revised WIC food package and children's diet quality. Pediatrics 2016; 137: e20153557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Altucher K, Rasmussen KM, Barden EM, Habicht JP. Predictors of improvement in hemoglobin concentration among toddlers enrolled in the Massachusetts WIC Program. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 709–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yun S, Liu Q, Mertzlufft K, et al. Evaluation of the Missouri WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children) breast‐feeding peer counselling programme. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13: 229–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Petrova A, Ayers C, Stechna S, Gerling JA, Mehta R. Effectiveness of exclusive breastfeeding promotion in low‐income mothers: a randomized controlled study. Breastfeed Med 2009; 4: 63–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rush D, Alvir JM, Kenny DA, Johnson SS, Horvitz DG. The National WIC Evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. III. Historical study of pregnancy outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 412–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kennedy ET, Gershoff S, Reed R, Austin JE. Evaluation of the effect of WIC supplemental feeding on birth weight. J Am Diet Assoc 1982; 80: 220–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Agriculture USDo . WIC Farmers Market Nutrition Program Fact Sheet. 2016.
- 21. National Academy of Sciences E, and Medicine . Review of WIC Food Packages: Improving Balance and Choice: Final Report. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. United States of Agriculture FaNS . Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Revitalizing Quality Nutrition Services (RQNS) 2015 [updated 08/26/2015; cited 2017. August 25]. Available from: https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/revitalizing‐quality‐nutrition‐services‐rqns.
- 23. U.S. Department of Agriculture FaNS . WIC Nutrition Education Study: Phase I Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services: Alexandria, VA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 24. United States of Agriculture FaNS . WIC Program Nutrition Education Guidance. The WIC Works Resource System, 2006.
- 25. IOM . Toolkit: Pregnancy Weight Gain Guidelines Dissemination Webinar. National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, 2013. [updated September11, 2013; cited 2015]. Available from: http://iom.edu/Activities/Children/PregnancyWeightDissemination/2013‐SEP‐09/ToolKit.aspx. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hartmann‐Boyce J, Johns DJ, Jebb SA, Aveyard P, Behavioural Weight Management Review Group . Effect of behavioural techniques and delivery mode on effectiveness of weight management: systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression. Obes Rev 2014; 15: 598–609. 10.1111/obr.12165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Knowler WC, Barrett‐Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Look AHEAD Research Group , Pi‐Sunyer X, Blackburn G, et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one‐year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1374–1383. 10.2337/dc07-0048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Fitzpatrick SL, Bandeen‐Roche K, Stevens VJ, et al. Examining behavioral processes through which lifestyle interventions promote weight loss: results from PREMIER. Obesity 2014; 22: 1002–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Thangaratinam S, Rogozinska E, Jolly K, et al. Interventions to reduce or prevent obesity in pregnant women: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2012; 16 10.3310/hta16310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gilmore LA, Butte NF, Ravussin E, Han H, Burton JH, Redman LM. Energy intake and energy expenditure for determining excess weight gain in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127: 884–892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gilmore LA, Klempel MC, Martin CK, et al. Personalized mobile health intervention for health and weight loss in postpartum women receiving Women, Infants, and Children benefit: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Womens Health (2002) 2017; 26: 719–727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Phelan S, Hagobian T, Brannen A, et al. Effect of an internet‐based program on weight loss for low‐income postpartum women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 317: 2381–2391. 10.1001/jama.2017.7119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Herring SJ. The challenge of postpartum weight loss in low‐income mothers. J Womens Health (2002) 2017; 26: 709–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, et al. Intervening during and after pregnancy to prevent weight retention among African American women. Prev Med Rep 2017; 7: 119–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Herring SJ. Do mHealth interventions prevent excessive gestational weight gain? BJOG 2017; 124: 1728 10.1111/1471-0528.14693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. U.S. Department of Agriculture FaNS . WIC Nutrition Education Study: Phase II Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services: Alexandria, VA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 38. National WIC Association . How the WIC program supports breastfeeding National WIC Association, 2016.
- 39. Masho SW, Cha S, Morris MR. Prepregnancy obesity and breastfeeding noninitiation in the United States: an examination of racial and ethnic differences. Breastfeed Med 2015; 10: 253–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hilson JA, Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL. High prepregnant body mass index is associated with poor lactation outcomes among white, rural women independent of psychosocial and demographic correlates. J Hum Lact 2004; 20: 18–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Turcksin R, Bel S, Galjaard S, Devlieger R. Maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation, intensity and duration: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr 2014; 10: 166–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Schwarz EB, Nothnagle M. The maternal health benefits of breastfeeding. Am Fam Physician 2015; 91: 603–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Gunderson EP, Hurston SR, Ning X, et al. Lactation and progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 889–898. 10.7326/m15-0807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Woo JG, Martin LJ. Does breastfeeding protect against childhood obesity? Moving beyond observational evidence. Curr Obes Rep 2015; 4: 207–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Brown A, Raynor P, Lee M. Maternal control of child‐feeding during breast and formula feeding in the first 6 months post‐partum. J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24: 177–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Brown A, Arnott B. Breastfeeding duration and early parenting behaviour: the importance of an infant‐led, responsive style. PLoS One 2014; 9: e83893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Brown A, Lee MD. Early influences on child satiety‐responsiveness: the role of weaning style. Pediatr Obes 2015; 10: 57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Li R, Fein SB, Grummer‐Strawn LM. Do infants fed from bottles lack self‐regulation of milk intake compared with directly breastfed infants? Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1386–e1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Fields DA, Schneider CR, Pavela G. A narrative review of the associations between six bioactive components in breast milk and infant adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016; 24: 1213–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lovelady C. Balancing exercise and food intake with lactation to promote post‐partum weight loss. Proc Nutr Soc 2011; 70: 181–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bertz F, Brekke HK, Ellegard L, Rasmussen KM, Wennergren M, Winkvist A. Diet and exercise weight‐loss trial in lactating overweight and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 96: 698–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Redman LM, Gilmore LA, Breaux J, et al. Effectiveness of SmartMoms, a novel eHealth intervention for management of gestational weight gain: randomized controlled pilot trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5: e133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Weber SJ, Dawson D, Greene H, Hull PC. Mobile phone apps for low‐income participants in a Public Health Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): review and analysis of features. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6: e12261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bensley RJ, Hovis A, Horton KD, et al. Accessibility and preferred use of online Web applications among WIC participants with Internet access. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014; 46: S87–S92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Rozga MR, Benton PA, Kerver JM, Olson BH. An integrated model of breastfeeding peer counseling support is feasible and associated with improved exclusive breastfeeding. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20: 2589–2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Puma JE, Thompson D, Baer K, et al. Enhancing periconceptional health by targeting postpartum mothers at rural WIC clinics. Health Promot Pract 2018; 19: 390–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wolff S, Legarth J, Vangsgaard K, Toubro S, Astrup A. A randomized trial of the effects of dietary counseling on gestational weight gain and glucose metabolism in obese pregnant women. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 495–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shirazian T, Monteith S, Friedman F, Rebarber A. Lifestyle modification program decreases pregnancy weight gain in obese women. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27: 411–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Davey RC, Hurst GL, Smith GR, Grogan SC, Kurth J. The impact and process of a community‐led intervention on reducing environmental inequalities related to physical activity and healthy eating – a pilot study. BMC Publ Health 2011; 11: 697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sekhobo JP, Egglefield K, Edmunds LS, Shackman G. Evidence of the adoption and implementation of a statewide childhood obesity prevention initiative in the New York State WIC Program: the NY Fit WIC process evaluation. Health Educ Res 2012; 27: 281–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Gance‐Cleveland B, Gilbert LH, Kopanos T, Gilbert KC. Evaluation of technology to identify and assess overweight children and adolescents. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2010; 15: 72–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Galtier‐Dereure F, Montpeyroux F, Boulot P, Bringer J, Jaffiol C. Weight excess before pregnancy: complications and cost. Int j obes relat metab disord 1995; 19: 443–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
