Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Feb 15;19(3):11. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1128-3

Diabetes Management in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease

Kristin K Clemens 1,2,3,4,5, Niamh O’Regan 3,5,6, Jinnie J Rhee 7
PMCID: PMC6469508  NIHMSID: NIHMS1018507  PMID: 30771017

Abstract

Purpose:

Older adults often live with chronic disease including diabetes and its complications. In this review we examine the complexity and heterogeneity of older adults with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, explore the nuances in their diabetes-related monitoring, and discuss their best diabetes management.

Recent findings:

Although there remains an overall lack of studies in older adults with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, recent reports have highlighted their vulnerabilities. These individuals face an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, frailty, dysglycemia, polypharmacy, declining kidney function, and acute kidney injury. Their diabetes management should focus upon safer antihyperglycemic medications, close monitoring, and care individualization.

Summary:

Older adults with diabetes and chronic kidney disease are a complex population who require careful diabetes management and monitoring. Research efforts might focus on improving the care and outcomes of these patients.

Keywords: diabetes, older adults, chronic kidney disease, antihyperglycemic medications, frailty, hypoglycemia, comorbidity

Introduction

With enhancements in medicine and improved survival, our population is aging. (1) The number of people over the age of 60 is expected to double by 2050, (1) and with the high prevalence of hypertension and obesity, not surprisingly, many of these individuals will live chronic, non-communicable disease, including diabetes and its complications. (2)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), typically defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria, or both (for a minimum of three months), (3) affects 25-40% of patients with diabetes. (4) Older adults who live with both diabetes and CKD are a complex, heterogenous population that require careful diabetes management. In this review we illustrate their complexities, highlight their need for special monitoring, review the antihyperglycemic medications that are most efficacious and safe in this population, and provide suggestions for their best management.

The complexity of older adults with diabetes and CKD

Cognitive impairment

Metabolism and physiological function changes as we age, and older adults frequently live with co-morbidity. This is particularly true for older adults with diabetes and CKD. In addition to living with diabetes and its complications, (5) these individuals remain at increased risk of geriatric syndromes including falls, chronic pain, depression, functional and cognitive decline. (6)

The risk of dementia in diabetes and CKD is gaining increasing attention. Diabetes (type 1 or 2) is a well-recognized risk factor for the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, especially vascular and Alzheimer’s dementia. (7) People with type 2 diabetes develop dementia on average 2.5 years earlier than those without diabetes, (8) an effect which is intensified in those who have MCI. (8)

Proposed mechanisms linking diabetes with MCI or dementia, include vascular damage, abnormalities in glucose, insulin and amyloid metabolism, hypertension, and increased body mass index. (7,8) A longer duration of diabetes (≥5 years) has also been associated with a 40-60% increased risk of dementia. (7) Hypoglycemia is an additional risk factor for dementia in patients with diabetes, (7) and interestingly, a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >7.0% in patients with MCI has also been associated with an increased risk of conversion to dementia. (9)

In older adults, CKD and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have also been independently linked with cognitive impairment. In addition to their underlying vascular disease,(10) it is has been proposed that uremic toxins might have a direct effect on cerebral structure and function. (11) The risk of cognitive decline increases as kidney function declines, (12,13) but unfortunately, cognition does not seem to improve with dialysis. (14) CKD might also accelerate the rate of cognitive decline in patients with diabetes through processes of anemia, inflammation or oxidative stress. (15)

A synergistic relationship between diabetes and CKD on cognition in older adults has also recently been postulated. In one cross-sectional study of 1,358 older adults (mean age 68.6 years), diabetes and kidney disease (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) had an interactive effect on cognitive impairment as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (relative excess risk due to interaction of 2.74). (15) Compared with individuals who had no diabetes or kidney disease, patients with both conditions faced a multi-adjusted odds ratio of 4.23 (95% CI, 2.10-8.49) for cognitive impairment. Mechanisms common to both diabetes and CKD, such as inflammation, peripheral vascular disease and cardiovascular disease might explain these findings. (15)

Whatever the mechanism linking diabetes and CKD with dementia, its development in older adults brings major challenges, particularly in their self-management and safety. (6) A recent systematic review explored the relationship between cognitive impairment and self-care in diabetes, (16) and found that those with cognitive impairment (particularly those with deficits in learning, memory and executive function) had significant impairment in all self-care domains. They had difficulties problem-solving, understanding their disease, and action taking. They faced an increased risk of hospitalization, but also had lower clinic attendance, and diabetes-related screening (eye examinations, HbA1c and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol measurement).

Sarcopenia and frailty

Traditional micro- and macro-vascular complications of diabetes appear to account for only half of diabetes-related disability in older adults. Sarcopenia and frailty are increasingly being considered as a third category of diabetes-related complications. (17,18)

From the age of 30 years, there is a progressive decline in muscle mass which accelerates with time. (19) Sarcopenia, a component of the frailty construct, relates to this loss of muscle mass. Definitions of sarcopenia vary and include either gender-specific cut-offs for grip-strength and appendicular lean muscle mass, or loss of muscle mass with associated reduced strength and/or low physical performance. (18) Frailty is a multi-dimensional condition characterized by low physiologic reserve which leads to an increased vulnerability to physiologic and environmental stressors, when compared to others of the same age. (20-22) There is no consensus definition of frailty; it comprises both physical and psychosocial components, including reduced lean muscle mass and sarcopenia, functional impairment, cognitive impairment, mental health and social issues. (23) Frailty is also associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, such as falls, fractures, hospitalization, dependency, disability, institutionalization, and lower health-related quality of life.(18,23)

Older adults with diabetes and CKD are at increased risk of sarcopenia and frailty. In early diabetes, poor glycemic control, oxidative stress, and inflammation have been postulated to play a role in the development of sarcopenia, whereas in the later stages of diabetes, complications including peripheral neuropathy play more of a role. (18) Insulin resistance, even in patients without diabetes, has also been linked with protein energy wasting and sarcopenia in those with CKD. (24) Vitamin D deficiency is also a well-recognized risk factor for frailty, and is especially apparent in patients with diabetes and CKD (those with diabetes at increased risk of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D; 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D production can be low in CKD). (23) Additional risk factors for frailty might include chronic disease and multimorbidity, (18,23,25) altered body composition including increased fat mass and reductions in muscle mass and function, malnutrition and inflammation. (26)

The prevalence of frailty has been found to increase across the CKD stages, with up to 70% of dialysis patients considered frail. (6) This effect appears independent of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and CRP level. (26) Among patients with CKD, the frailty phenotype is associated with an increased risk of early dialysis therapy or death. (26)

Dysglycemia

In addition to their risk of cognitive decline, dementia, sarcopenia and frailty, older adults with diabetes and CKD are at risk of both hyper- and hypoglycemia. Even without underlying diabetes, an eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 has been linked with insulin resistance and reductions in insulin secretion. (27) Postulated contributing factors include vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism, (28,29) reduction in GFR, acid-base homeostasis, physical activity, body composition/adiposity, and medication use. (27) If using peritoneal dialysis, patients can have higher blood sugars secondary to higher dialysate glucose.(30)

The risk of hypoglycemia is also substantial in older adults with CKD, with and without diabetes. In a population-based cohort study of older adults from 2002-2010 (mean age 75 years), we examined the 3-year incidence of hypoglycemia across the stages of kidney disease. (31) In patients who used antihyperglycemic medications, the risk of hypoglycemia increased from 82 (95% CI, 71-94) encounters per 10,000 person-years in those with an eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2, to 785 (95% CI, 689-894) encounters per 10,000 person-years in those receiving dialysis. This graded relationship was also apparent in those who did not use antihyperglycemic medications, and where kidney function was defined using a combination of eGFR and albuminuria. (31)

The reasons for hypoglycemia in older adults with diabetes and CKD can be manifold. Many antihyperglycemic medications are cleared by the kidneys, putting patients with CKD at increased risk of drug-induced hypoglycemia. (32,33) Muscle wasting and dysfunction might also contribute to reduced insulin clearance. (27)Patients with CKD and diabetes also have more medical comorbidities (including autonomic neuropathy) which might increase their susceptibility to hypoglycemia. (34,35) Additionally, they often have longer-standing diabetes which is a known risk factor for hypoglycemia. (35) Dementia, MCI, poor meal planning and insulin product mix-ups have also been implicated. (36-38) In patients with CKD without diabetes, hypoglycemia might be related to malnutrition with lower glycogen stores, (39) and reduced renal gluconeogenesis. (40,41)

Compounding their hypoglycemia risk is that older adults with diabetes often experience impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. In a study of patients with type 2 diabetes, those age ≥65 years had a different awareness and response to hypoglycemia than younger individuals (age 39-64 years). They also had a less pronounced increase in autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms at the end of hypoglycemic plateaus. (42) The study did not specifically evaluate if these effects were independent of beta blocker use.

Over recent years, hospitalizations for hypoglycemia have surpassed the number for hyperglycemia, especially in those ≥75 years. In a study of United States Medicare beneficiaries from 1999-2011, hospitalization rates for hypoglycemia were nearly 2-fold higher in those ≥75 years compared with those 65-74 years.(38) Hypoglycemia can have significant consequences for patients including cardiac disturbances, neurological complications, impaired quality of life, and even death.(43) Prevention is thus key in the older adult population.

Polypharmacy

With their many medical conditions, older adults with CKD and diabetes are at increased risk of polypharmacy. In a study of 685 nursing home residents, 53.3% reported using 5-9 medications (defined as polypharmacy), and 16.4% had evidence of excessive polypharmacy (10 or more medications). An eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 was associated with polypharmacy in multivariable analysis. (44) Unfortunately, polypharmacy has been linked with adverse drug reactions, (45) especially in those with CKD.

Heterogeneity

It is important to emphasize that older adults with diabetes are a heterogenous population. Although many live with functional impairment, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and have frequent hypoglycemia, others do not. Older adults can have new-onset type 2 diabetes after their diagnosis of CKD, if their kidney disease is due to non-diabetic glomerular syndromes (which are more common in older adults). (46) Older adults with type 1 diabetes also now survive into older age. (47) Thus age, does not always equate with patient complexity.

Special monitoring

Increased attention has been paid to the need for special diabetes-related monitoring in older adults with diabetes (i.e. monitoring of kidney function and glycemic control).

Impact of aging on measures of kidney function

The measurement of kidney function (filtration and secretion) can be challenging in older adults. GFR is typically used to provide a measure of functioning nephrons, and in clinical practice is estimated using the clearance of the endogenous marker, creatinine. (48) Formulae including the Cockcroft–Gault, (49) the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, (50) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI), (51) are validated creatinine-based formulae to estimate kidney function. These estimating equations were however, not specifically developed in older adults. (52)

Additionally, there are limitations to using creatinine to estimate GFR in older patients. Creatinine production is dependent upon muscle mass, and in older adults, the production of creatinine can be heterogeneous. (52) Patients can also have variable creatinine secretion (e.g. those with nephrotic syndrome).(53) Thus despite having a normal creatinine, older adults can have “concealed renal failure” with a declining GFR. (54)

Recently, new eGFR formulas have been proposed which use cystatin C and creatinine as endogenous markers. Although more validation studies are needed, these equations (e.g. Berlin Initiative Study 2 Equation) seem to yield smaller biases in renal function measurement than creatinine based formulae. (52).Such equations are however, not routinely available.

Although the best measures of kidney function in older patients remains controversial, all equations seem to provide similar estimates when GFR is <30ml/min/1.73 m2, which is a frequent cut off to guide drug dosing.(55) It might be reasonable then to use any equation to guide antihyperglycemic medication dosing.(56) If there is need to accurately quantify kidney function (e.g. in cases where highly toxic drugs or kidney transplantation are being considered), one might perform a nuclear measurement of GFR (i.e. renal scan). Although 24 urine creatinine collections can also be considered in these situations, (57) there remains the possibility of inaccurate collections especially in older adults.

Trajectory of kidney function among older adults

Due to fibrosis, tubular atrophy, obliterated arterioles, vascular resistance, and defective autoregulation, GFR and tubular secretion decline naturally with time in older individuals. (58) In a study of 4,380 patients (mean age 72 years), 6% had an annual decline of eGFR greater than 3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 when using creatinine-based equations, and 25% had an annual decline of eGFR >3 ml/min/1.73 m2 when cystatin C-based equations were used. (59) It is also known that older adults with diabetes and CKD face an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), (2) which might be due to comorbid disease such as prostatic hypertrophy or congestive heart failure, (2) or the use of nephrotoxic medications.(2,58)

Glycemic control

In addition to monitoring their kidney function, special attention needs to be paid to glycemic monitoring in older adults with CKD. Where HbA1c is suggested for monitoring in most healthy individuals, this test is affected by reduced red cell survival, use of erythropoietin, hemoglobin modifications, and mechanical destruction of blood cells. (60,61) These conditions are often present in CKD, and the correlation between HbA1c and fasting glucose weakens with lower kidney function. (61)

The use of glycated albumin and fructosamine as alternative measures of glycemic control in patients with CKD has been suggested, but these measures may be equally flawed. (62) Their usefulness depends upon normal serum albumin levels, which are rarely observed in patients with CKD as they often have altered plasma protein turnover. Moreover, glycated albumin and fructosamine are affected by many physiological conditions, and may fail to serve as stable markers. (63)

In the absence of consistent and sufficient data to show superiority of their use over HbA1c as markers for glycemic control, it would be reasonable to continue use HbA1c or even capillary blood glucose, to monitor glycemic control in this population.

Challenges in diabetes management

Antihyperglycemic agents

A cornerstone of diabetes management is the administration of antihyperglycemic drugs. Over the last several years, the armamentarium of drugs available to treat patients with diabetes has grown. Unfortunately, however, therapeutic choices can be limited in older adults, especially in those with CKD.

Metformin

Due to its low cost, neutral effect on weight, low risk of hypoglycemia, and effectiveness in lowering blood glucose, metformin is currently the recommended first-line therapy for the management of diabetes. (64) However, in older adults, particularly in those with CKD, metformin has been reported to increase the risk of lactic acidosis and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. (65) In those with CKD it is suggested that metformin can be used without dose reduction to an eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2, but that a reduction to 1,000 mg daily be used in patients with eGFR ≥30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2. (65) Although recommendations vary, metformin is not advised in those with a serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL in men or ≥1.4 mg/dL in women, when eGFR is <30 mL/min, or in those over the age of 80 with reduced kidney function. (65)

Sulfonylureas

Sulfonylureas are effective agents for lowering blood glucose and are often used in combination with other glucose-lowering agents, including metformin. Hypoglycemia can however, occur with these drugs, and this effect appears most pronounced in older adults with CKD due to reduced renal clearance of these agents and their metabolites. (66) Chlorpropamide and glyburide/glibenclamide should be avoided in the elderly because of their high hypoglycemia risk. (67) Glipizide, gliclazide and glimepiride are safer options because their clearance and half-life are not heavily affected by renal function. (68) It is currently suggested that these agents still be used with caution in those with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. (69,70)

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs)

TZDs do not cause hypoglycemia as monotherapy and have durable effects on glycemic control. However, they are associated with weight gain, fluid retention, edema, congestive heart failure, and bladder cancer, (65) and in older women in particular, an increased risk of fragility fracture has been descried. (71,72) As such, these agents should not be used in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure, or in older adults with osteoporosis. Bone density should be monitored when these agents are prescribed in patients with osteopenia. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are both metabolized by the liver, therefore, dose adjustment is not needed in patients with CKD. (63) Nonetheless, the risk of fluid retention makes the use of these drugs limited in older patients with CKD.

Meglitinides

Meglitinides have rapid onset time and short half-life, and when taken before meals, they can control postprandial hyperglycemia. (65,73,74) Compared with sulphonylureas, they are associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia. (65) While nateglinide is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, (73) repaglinide can be used without dose adjustment. (75) Among patients with CKD treated with repaglinide, a clearance as low as 20 mL/min was not associated with hypoglycemia.(76) Meglitinides however, are costly and require frequent dosing, which may limit their use in the elderly population.

Incretins

Incretins (glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors) have garnered more attention in recent years, with large clinical trials providing evidence on the efficacy and safety of these agents.

GLP-1 receptor agonists

Although there is evidence of the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, lixesenatide, and albiglutide), there have been no studies specifically conducted in older adults with diabetes and CKD. However, there is no reason to believe that there would be major differences in the efficacy and safety profiles between older and young patients.(77) GLP-1 receptor agonists carry a low risk of hypoglycemia and can encourage weight loss, but they are costly and need to be delivered by injection. GI upset is common, which may not be tolerable in older patients. Impaired kidney function reduces the clearance of exenatide, and its use should be avoided in patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min. (78) Although guideline recommendations vary, no dose adjustments are needed for liraglutide, dulaglutide, lixesenatide, or albiglutide in CKD patients, but caution is advised in the advanced stages given a lack of data in this population. (67,73)

DPP-4 inhibitors

DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin) reduce blood glucose by decreasing glucagon secretion and blocking the breakdown of GLP-1, an incretin hormone (70,71). These drugs then stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent fashion, and reduce gastric emptying. (78,79)

DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with a low risk of hypoglycemia and are weight neutral. Several clinical trials have shown the efficacy, safety and tolerability of these agents in older adults with CKD. (80-82) All DPP-4 inhibitors except linagliptin are excreted via the kidneys to some extent. As such, these agents require dose adjustment according to eGFR. (83) Older adults prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors including sitagliptin, do not appear to be at an increased risk of pancreatitis compared with those prescribed other antihyperglycemic medications. (84)

SGLT-2 inhibitors

SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce glucose uptake from the kidney, and their antihyperglycemic action depends on urinary glucose excretion. As such, their glycemic lowering potential is reduced in patients with CKD. (83)

Only a few randomized trials have examined the efficacy or safety of canagliflozin and dapagliflozin in older adults (mean age of 67-69 years) with diabetes and CKD. (85,86) As anticipated, these studies showed that the glycemic lowering potential of SGLT-2 inhibitors was reduced in older adults, particularly in those with impaired kidney function. (87) Studies were limited to patients who were relatively healthy, without any serious comorbid conditions or cognitive impairment.

In addition to lowering blood sugar and inducing weight loss by promoting a negative calorie balance, reduction of blood pressure has been reported due to osmotic diuresis. (85) For this reason, SGLT-2 inhibitors may be beneficial in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension, but they should not be used in those with hypotension.

It is currently suggested that canagliflozin should not be used in patients with an eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and dapagliflozin is not recommended for patients with an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. (87) No more than 100 mg once daily of canagliflozin should be used in patients with eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2. (73) While the hypoglycemia risk of these agents is low in middle-aged patients, the incidence of hypoglycemia is increased in older adults, particularly among those with later stages of CKD. (85-89) These agents are also expensive with a 30-day supply estimated to cost $350-400 US dollars. As such, older adults on fixed incomes may have difficulty affording these therapies. (83)

Insulin

With age comes progressive β-cell function decline, making insulin therapy often necessary in older adults. However as it is cleared by the kidneys, an initial insulin dosage reduction of 25% is sometimes recommended in patients with eGFR 10-50 mL/min to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.(75) When long-acting insulin such as glargine or detemir are used, dose reductions of 50% have also been suggested.(75) These long-acting basal insulin analogues might be preferred given they appear to have a lower hypoglycemia risk than NPH or regular insulin, (90) although studies are duly lacking in those with CKD. If needed for post-prandial control, rapid-acting insulin administration after a meal in those with CKD may be beneficial. (73)

Comorbidities, poor physical function, and cognitive impairment can make safe insulin administration difficult. More complicated insulin regimens, can increase the odds of dosing error and the risk of hypoglycemia, especially in older patients with cognitive impairment. Between 2007-2011 in the United States, there were 97,648 hospital encounters for insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors. (38) Compared with those aged 65-79 and 45-64, patients over the age of 80 had higher rates of emergency department visits (34.9 per 1,000 insulin treated patients with diabetes). Almost 2/3 of patients had severe hypoglycemia. (38)

Glycemic targets

A summary of guideline recommendations for glycemic targets in older adults is included in Table 1.

Table 1.

Guideline recommendations for HbA1c targets for older adults with diabetes

American Diabetes Association (97) Diabetes Canada (98) International Diabetes Federation
(99)
Healthy: few existing chronic illnesses, intact cognitive and functional status <7.5% Functionally independent ≤7.0% Functionally independent 7.0 – 7.5%
Complex/intermediate: multiple coexisting chronic illnesses or ≥2 instrumental ADL impairments or mid-to-moderate cognitive impairment <8.0% Functionally dependent 7.1 −8.0% Functionally dependent 7.0 – 8.0%
Very complex/poor health: long-term care or end-stage chronic illnesses or moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment or ≥2 ADL dependencies <8.5% Frail and/or presence of dementia 7.1 −8.5% Functionally dependent with frailty <8.5%
End of life A1c measurements not recommended. Avoid hypoglycemia and symptomatic hyperglycemia Functionally dependent with dementia <8.5%
End of life Avoid symptomatic hyperglycemia

Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living

Some suggest that it is not unreasonable for healthy older patients who have normal life expectancy to aim for the same glycemic targets as younger adults (HbA1c <7%). In older patients with only a few comorbidities and a reasonable life expectancy, <7.5% is a reasonable goal. There is growing recognition that intensive glycemic control in older frail patients with diabetes has limited benefit and probably causes harm and as such, a target HbA1c of <8.0% has been suggested. In the severely frail, functional outcomes appear best over two years when patients have an HbA1c >8.0%, and as such as target of <8.5% has been proposed in this population. (17)

It is however, important to prevent severe hyperglycemia in older adults. Hyperglycemia can lead to polyuria, polydipsia and nocturia, visual impairment, dehydration, and can predispose patients to urinary tract infections, candidiasis, and cardiovascular events. (17) Screening and treatment of potential microvascular complications should also not be disregarded in this age group.

Discussion

Older adults with diabetes are a complex, heterogenous population. Health care professionals who manage these patients should play close attention to their comorbidities and functional status, practice safe and cautious prescribing, individualize their glycemic targets, closely monitor them, involve other care professionals in their management, and provide them with patient-centered care.

Awareness of comorbidities and functional status

Care professionals who treat older adults with diabetes and CKD should be fully aware of their comorbidities and functional status. During their clinical assessments, providers might periodically screen for cognitive dysfunction and depression, or involve geriatric teams to help with this screening. (91) Frailty is a recognized complication of diabetes and reduced kidney function, but is often not assessed in older adults with diabetes. There are multiple frailty measures available, many of which require minimal training for accurate use.(17)

Attention should also be paid to the risk of nutritional deficiency in older adults. (91) Good nutrition with vitamin D and protein intake (especially the amino acid leucine) have been associated with improvements in muscle mass and function. (18) Physical rehabilitation and multi-component exercise programs incorporating balance exercises, gait re-training, and strength, power and resistance training, have the potential to reverse frailty deficits. (18) Vision and hearing should be screened, and attention should be paid to health literacy and self-management skills. (91,92)

Practice safe, cautious prescribing

Before prescribing new medications, the medication lists of older adults with CKD should be reviewed. Where patients are at increased risk of polypharmacy, their need for prescribed therapies might be re-evaluated, and medications should be reconciled. (91) Providers might also look for nephrotoxic medications and use drug interaction checkers when reviewing their medication lists.

We also suggest that when prescribing antihyperglycemic medications, regimens should be made simple. Prescribers might choose the lowest effective dose of medications, ensure that patients know how to take their drugs, (93) and ensure that they can distinguish between therapies to avoid product mix ups. (38) Although older adults with CKD are frequently excluded from clinical drug studies, it would be reasonable to choose antihyperglycemic medications with a strong benefit to risk ratio for these patients. As they are at increased risk of drug-associated hypoglycemia, it would be important to choose agents with a lower hypoglycemia risk. It is also necessary to consider the cost of antihyperglycemic medications given older adults are frequently on fixed incomes or have limited drug benefits.

Individualization of glycemic targets

Glycemic targets should be based upon the individual patient. Given the heterogeneity of older adults with diabetes, there are no age specific recommendations for glycemic control. Targets should depend upon their function, life expectancy, and risk of hypoglycemia. (94) In older adults, it also remains important to identify overtreatment and to de-intensify and de-prescribe to minimize harm. (95) Unfortunately, the over-treatment of older adults remains an issue. In a study of patients >70 years with type 2 diabetes prescribed sulphonylureas or insulin in the United Kingdom, (95) almost 1/3 had an HbA1c <7%. Those with CKD or dementia, were overtreated just as commonly as those without these conditions.

Monitor closely

While HbA1c measurement might be useful to evaluate glycemic trends, attention to capillary and venous blood glucose is important in older adults with diabetes and CKD. The kidney function of these individuals might also be monitored more frequently, given the risk of declining function and AKI.

Involve family, healthcare team

Given their complexity, care professionals might involve multidisciplinary care teams in the management of older adults with diabetes and CKD. Geriatricians can bring expertise in managing multi-morbidity, de-prescribing, falls risk reduction and rehabilitation. (17) In older adults, multidisciplinary teams (i.e. geriatricians, diabetes nurse educators, registered dietitians) can improve glycemic control and self-care behaviors when compared with usual diabetes care. (96)

Conclusion

Older adults with diabetes and CKD are a complex, vulnerable population. We suggest a patient-centered, individualized approach to their best management. Where the number of patients living with these conditions will continue to increase, more efforts might also be taken to understand their outcomes, and the ideal therapies and targets to use in this population.

Acknowledgments

Kristin K. Clemens reports grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Strategy for Patient Oriented Research and grants from Western University. Niamh O’Regan reports a grant from the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario. Jinnie J. Rhee reports grants from National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 Research Scientist Career Development Award).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: Kristin K. Clemens received a 2017 Diabetes Canada Junior Investigator Award funded by AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work. She has also received conference support from Merck Inc.

Niamh O’Regan and Jinnie J. Rhee declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.World Health Organization. Number of people over 60 years set to double by 2050; major societal changes required [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2018 September 17]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/older-persons-day/en/
  • 2.Stevens LA, Viswanathan G, Weiner DE. Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the Elderly Population: Current Prevalence, Future Projections, and Clinical Significance. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 2010; 17 (4): 293–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.USRDS. CKD in the general population [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2018 September 18]. Available from: https://www.usrds.org/2017/view/v1_01.aspx
  • 4.Lloyd A, Komenda P. Optimizing care for Canadians with diabetic nephropathy in 2015. Can J Diabetes [Internet]. 2015;39(3):221–8. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med8&AN=25805325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clemens KK, Ouedraogo A, Nash DM, Garg AXSS. The health and healthcare of adults with type 1 and 2 diabetes across the estimated glomerular filtration rate spectrum. Can J Diabetes. 2018. S1499–2671(18)30148–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lau DCW. Diabetes in the Elderly: A Silent Global Tsunami. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2016; 40 (1): 2–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pal K, Mukadam N, Petersen I, Cooper C. Mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia in people with diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol [Internet]. 2018. September 4 [cited 2018 Sep 26]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30182156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Biessels GJ, Strachan MWJ, Visseren FLJ, Kappelle LJ, Whitmer RA. Dementia and cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes and prediabetic stages: towards targeted interventions. lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2(3): 246–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ma F, Wu T, Miao R, Xiao Y yu, Zhang W, Huang G Conversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia among Subjects with Diabetes: A Population-Based Study of Incidence and Risk Factors with Five Years of Follow-up. J Alzheimer’s Dis [Internet]. 2014. December 23 [cited 2018 Sep 26];43(4):1441–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kurella M, Chertow GM, Luan J, Yaffe K. Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52 (11): 1863–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Palmer ND, Sink KM, Smith SC, Xu J, Bowden DW, Hugenschmidt CE, et al. Kidney Disease and Cognitive Function: African American-Diabetes Heart Study MIND. Am J Nephrol [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2018 September 26];40(3):200–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25323981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yaffe K, Ackerson L, Tamura MK, Le Blanc P, Kusek JW, Sehgal AR, et al. Chronic kidney disease and cognitive function in older adults: Findings from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort cognitive study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58 (2): 338–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tamura MK, Muntner P, Wadley V, Cushman M, Zakai NA, Bradbury BD, et al. Albuminuria, kidney function, and the incidence of cognitive impairment among adults in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011; 58(5): 756–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kurella Tamura M, Unruh ML, Nissenson AR, Larive B, Eggers PW, Gassman J, et al. Effect of more frequent hemodialysis on cognitive function in the frequent hemodialysis network trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013; 61 (2): 228–37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yin Z, Yan Z, Liang Y, Jiang H, Cai C, Song A, et al. Interactive effects of diabetes and impaired kidney function on cognitive performance in old age: a population-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Santos FRM, Bernardo V, Gabbay MAL, Dib SA, Sigulem D. The impact of knowledge about diabetes, resilience and depression on glycemic control: A cross-sectional study among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr [Internet]. 2013;5 (1) (no(55). Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=emed15&AN=52796814 http://vr2pk9sx9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:emed15&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. ••.Strain WD, Hope SV., Green A, Kar P, Valabhji J, Sinclair AJ Type 2 diabetes mellitus in older people: a brief statement of key principles of modern day management including the assessment of frailty. A national collaborative stakeholder initiative. Diabet Med [Internet]. 2018. July [cited 2018 Sep 26];35(7):838–45. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29633351.This paper provides excellent recommendations for the assessment and management of frailty in older patients.
  • 18.Sinclair AJ, Abdelhafiz AH, Rodríguez-Mañas L. Frailty and sarcopenia - newly emerging and high impact complications of diabetes. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2017; 31 (9): 1465–1473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hughes V a, Frontera WR, Roubenoff R, Evans WJ, Singh M a F. Longitudinal changes in body composition in older men and women: role of body weight change and physical activity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76 (2): 473–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kane AE, Gregson E, Theou O, Rockwood K, Howlett SE. The association between frailty, the metabolic syndrome, and mortality over the lifespan. GeroScience. 2017; 39(2): 221–229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J, Hogan DB, Hummel S, Karunananthan S, et al. Frailty: An Emerging Research and Clinical Paradigm--Issues and Controversies. Journals Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62(7): 731–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005; 173 (5): 489–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adame Perez SI, Senior PA, Field CJ, Jindal K, Mager DR. Frailty, Health-Related Quality of Life, Cognition, Depression, Vitamin D and Health-Care Utilization in an Ambulatory Adult Population with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Can J diabetes [Internet]. 2018. June 20 [cited 2018 Sep 26]; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1499267118300017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Roshanravan B, Zelnick LR, Djucovic D, Gu H, Alvarez JA, Ziegler TR, et al. Chronic kidney disease attenuates the plasma metabolome response to insulin. JCI Insight [Internet]. 2018. August 23 [cited 2018 Dec 10];3(16). Available from: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/122219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thein FS, Li Y, Nyunt MSZ, Gao Q, Wee SL, Ng TP. Physical frailty and cognitive impairment is associated with diabetes and adversely impact functional status and mortality. Postgrad Med [Internet]. 2018. August 18 [cited 2018 Sep 26];130(6):561–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roshanravan B, Khatri M, Robinson-Cohen C, Levin G, Patel K V, de Boer IH, et al. A prospective study of frailty in nephrology-referred patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis [Internet]. 2012. December [cited 2018 Dec 10];60(6):912–21. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272638612008542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Boer IH, Zelnick L, Afkarian M, Ayers E, Curtin L, Himmelfarb J, et al. Impaired Glucose and Insulin Homeostasis in Moderate-Severe CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2018 December 8];27(9):2861–71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kovesdy CP, Park JC, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Glycemic Control and Burnt-Out Diabetes in ESRD. Semin Dial. 2010; 23(2): 148–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kovesdy CP, Sharma K, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Glycemic control in diabetic CKD patients: where do we stand? Am J Kidney Dis [Internet]. 2008;52(4):766–77. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med6&AN=18572289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rhee CM, Leung AM, Kovesdy CP, Lynch KE, Brent GA, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Updates on the management of diabetes in dialysis patients. Semin Dial. 2014; 27(2): 135–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hodge M; McArthur E; Garg AX, Tangri NCK. Hypoglycemia risk by estimated glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 70(1): 59–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moen MF, Zhan M, Hsu VD, Walker LD, Einhorn LM, Seliger SL, et al. Frequency of hypoglycemia and its significance in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(6):1121–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Biesenbach G, Raml A, Schmekal B, Eichbauer-Sturm G. Decreased insulin requirement in relation to GFR in nephropathic Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2003;20(8):642–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Torffvit O, Lindqvist A, Agardh CD, Pahlm O. The association between diabetic nephropathy and autonomic nerve function in type 1 diabetic patients. Scand J Clin Lab Inv Scand J Clin Lab Inv [Internet]. 1997;57(2):183–91. Available from: //a1997xa63500012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Frier BM, Ellis JD, Donnan PT, Durrant R, et al. Frequency and predictors of hypoglycaemia in Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: a population-based study. Diabet Med [Internet]. 2005. June [cited 2016 May 19];22(6):749–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15910627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ciudin A, Espinosa A, Simó-Servat O, Ruiz A, Alegret M, Hernández C, et al. Type 2 diabetes is an independent risk factor for dementia conversion in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Diabetes Complications. 2017; 31 (8): 1272–1274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.De Galan BE, Zoungas S, Chalmers J, Anderson C, Dufouil C, Pillai A, et al. Cognitive function and risks of cardiovascular disease and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: The action in diabetes and vascular disease: Preterax and diamicron modified release controlled evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. Diabetologia. 2009; 52(11): 2328–2336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Geller AI, Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Kegler SR, Weidenbach KN, Ryan GJ, et al. National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174 (5): 678–86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Garber AJ, Bier DM, Cryer PE, Pagliara AS. Hypoglycemia in compensated chronic renal insufficiency. Substrate limitation of gluconeogenesis. Diabetes [Internet]. 1974. December [cited 2016 Jul 14];23(12):982–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4435312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Woerle HJ, Meyer C, Popa EM, Cryer PE, Gerich JE. Renal compensation for impaired hepatic glucose release during hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: Further evidence for hepatorenal reciprocity. Diabetes. 2003;52(6):1386–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alsahli M, Gerich JE. Hypoglycemia in Patients with Diabetes and Renal Disease. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2015. January 1 [cited 2016 Jan 18];4(5):948–64. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4470208/?report=abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bremer JP, Jauch-Chara K, Hallschmid M, Schmid S, Schultes B. Hypoglycemia unawareness in older compared with middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32 (8): 1513–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frier BM. Hypoglycaemia in diabetes mellitus: epidemiology and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol [Internet]. 2014. October 7 [cited 2014 Oct 8];10(12):711–22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25287289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dörks M, Herget-Rosenthal S, Schmiemann G, Hoffmann F. Polypharmacy and Renal Failure in Nursing Home Residents: Results of the Inappropriate Medication in Patients with Renal Insufficiency in Nursing Homes (IMREN) Study. Drugs and Aging. 2016; 33(1): 45–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ahmed B, Nanji K, Mujeeb R, Patel MJ. Effects of polypharmacy on adverse drug reactions among geriatric outpatients at a tertiary care Hospital in Karachi: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e112133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Williams ME. Diabetic kidney disease in elderly individuals. Med Clin North Am. 2013; 97(1): 75–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, Bergensta RM, DuBose SN, DiMeglio LA, et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: Updated data from the t1d exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(6): 971–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jacobs A, Benraad C, Wetzels J, Rikkert MO, Kramers C. Clinical Relevance of Differences in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimations in Frail Older People by Creatinine- vs. Cystatin C-Based Formulae. Drugs and Aging. 2017; 34 (6): 445–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16(1): 31–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130 (6): 461–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR Using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Creatinine Equation: More Accurate GFR Estimates, Lower CKD Prevalence Estimates, and Better Risk Predictions. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2010; 55(4): 622–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schaeffner ES, Ebert N, Delanaye P, Frei U, Gaedeke J, Jakob O, et al. Two novel equations to estimate kidney function in persons aged 70 years or older. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(7): 471–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Branten AJW, Vervoort G, Wetzels JFM. Serum creatinine is a poor marker of GFR in nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant [Internet]. 2005. April 1 [cited 2018 Dec 9];20(4):707–11. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ndt/gfh719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Corsonello A, Pedone C, Corica F, Mussi C, Carbonin P, Incalzi RA. Concealed renal insufficiency and adverse drug reactions in elderly hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(7): 790–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stevens LA, Nolin TD, Richardson MM, Feldman HI, Lewis JB, Rodby R, et al. Comparison of Drug Dosing Recommendations Based on Measured GFR and Kidney Function Estimating Equations. Am J Kidney Dis [Internet]. 2009. July [cited 2018 Dec 13];54(1):33–42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19446939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.CKD & Drug Dosing: Information for Providers ∣ NIDDK [Internet]. [cited 2018. December 13]. Available from: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/clinical-tools-patient-education-outreach/ckd-drug-dosing-providers
  • 57.Chronic Kidney Disease, Classification ∣ National Kidney Foundation [Internet]. [cited 2018. December 13],. Available from: https://www.kidney.org/professionals/guidelines/guidelines_commentaries/chronic-kidney-disease-classification
  • 58.Khan S, Loi V, Rosner MH. Drug-Induced Kidney Injury in the Elderly. Drugs and Aging. 2017; 34(10): 729–741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shlipak MG, Katz R, Kestenbaum B, Fried LF, Newman AB, Siscovick DS, et al. Rate of kidney function decline in older adults: A comparison using creatinine and cystatin C. Am J Nephrol. 2009; 30(3): 171–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, Chiang JL, de Boer IH, Goldstein-Fuchs J, et al. Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Report From an ADA Consensus Conference. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2864–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rhee JJ, Ding VY, Rehkopf DH, Arce CM, Winkelmayer WC. Correlates of poor glycemic control among patients with diabetes initiating hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease. BMC Nephrol [Internet]. 2015. December 9 [cited 2018 Dec 10];16:204 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bloomgarden Z, Handelsman Y. How does CKD affect HbA1c? J Diabetes [Internet]. 2018. April 1 [cited 2018 Dec 10];10(4):270–270. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1753-0407.12624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Speeckaert M, Van Biesen W, Delanghe J, Slingerland R, Wiecek A, Heaf J, et al. Are there better alternatives than haemoglobin A1c to estimate glycaemic control in the chronic kidney disease population? Nephrol Dial Transplant [Internet]. 2014;29(12):2167–77. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med8&AN=24470517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bosi E Metformin - The gold standard in type 2 diabetes: What does the evidence tell us? Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2009; 11 Suppl 2: 3–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim KS, Kim SK, Sung KM, Cho YW, Park SW. Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults. Diabetes Metab J. 2012; 36(5): 336–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schejter YD, Turvall E, Ackerman Z. Characteristics of Patients With Sulphonurea-Induced Hypoglycemia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13(3): 234–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Harper W, Clement M, Goldenberg R, Hanna A, Main A, Retnakaran R, et al. Canadian Diabetes Associaton Guidelines – Pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes. [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://guidelines.diabetes.ca/Browse/Chapter13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Clemens KK, McArthur E, Dixon SN, Fleet JL, Hramiak I, Garg AX. The Hypoglycemic Risk of Glyburide (Glibenclamide) Compared with Modified-Release Gliclazide. Can J diabetes [Internet]. 2015. March 31 [cited 2015 Jul 9]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25840942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Balant L, Zahnd G, Gorgia A, Schwarz R, Fabre J. Pharmacokinetics of glipizide in man: Influence of renal insufficiency. Diabetologia. 1973; September: 331–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Arjona Ferreira JC, Marre M, Barzilai N, Guo H, Golm GT, Sisk CM, et al. Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin versus glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes andmoderate-to-severe chronic renal insufficiency. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2013;36(5): 1067–73. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/5/1067.full.pdf http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=emed15&AN=368812372 http://vr2pk9sx9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journa [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schwartz A V TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence. PPAR Research. 2008; 297893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Meier C, Kraenzlin ME, Bodmer M, Jick SS, Jick H, Meier CR. Use of thiazolidinediones and fracture risk. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(8): 820–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. •.Molitch ME Diabetes management in the elderly patient with kidney disease [Internet]. American Society of Nephrology Kidney News. 2015. [cited 2018 September 26]. Available from: https://www.kidneynews.org/kidney-news/special-sections/geriatric-nephrology/diabetes-management-in-the-elderly-patient-with-kidney-disease.This article provides an up to date review and recommendations for diabetes management in older adults with CKD
  • 74.Nattrass M, Lauritzen T. Review of prandial glucose regulation with repaglinide: a solution to the problem of hypoglycaemia in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes? Int J Obes. 2000; 24 Supple 3: S21–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Abaterusso C, Lupo A, Ortalda V, De Biase V, Pani A, Muggeo M, et al. Treating elderly people with diabetes and stages 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol [Internet]. 2008. July [cited 2015 Apr 2];3(4):1185–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18417749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Schumacher S, Abbasi I, Weise D, Hatorp V, Sattler K, Sieber J, et al. Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of repaglinide in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol [Internet]. 2001. May [cited 2018 Sep 26];57(2):147–52. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11417447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bourdel-Marchasson I, Schweizer A, Dejager S. Incretin therapies in the management of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hospital practice (1995). 2011; 39(1): 7–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Puttanna A, Varadhan L. Renal safety of newer medications. Practical Diabetes. 2016; 33(3): 1 [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Engel SS, Williams-Herman DE, Golm GT, Clay RJ, Machotka SV, Kaufman KD, et al. Sitagliptin: review of preclinical and clinical data regarding incidence of pancreatitis. Int J Clin Pract. 2010. June;64(7):984–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schweizer A, Dejager S, Bosi E. Comparison of vildagliptin and metformin monotherapy in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial. Diabetes, Obes Metab. 2009; 11(8): 804–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Schweizer A, Dejager S, Foley JE, Shao Q, Kothny W. Clinical experience with vildagliptin in the management of type 2 diabetes in a patient population ≥75 years: a pooled analysis from a database of clinical trials. Diabetes, Obes Metab [Internet]. 2011. January [cited 2018 Sep 26];13(1):55–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21114604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shankar RR, Xu L, Golm GT, O’neill EA, Goldstein BJ, Kaufman KD, et al. A comparison of glycaemic effects of sitagliptin and sulfonylureas in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pract. 2015; 69(6): 626–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hahr AJ, Molitch ME. Management of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol [Internet]. 2015;1:2 Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=prem&AN=28702221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Clemens KK, McArthur E, Fleet JL, Hramiak I, Garg AX. The risk of pancreatitis with sitagliptin therapy in older adults: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2015; 2(2): E172–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yale J-F, Bakris G, Cariou B, Yue D, David-Neto E, Xi L, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013; 15 (5): 463–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kohan DE, Fioretto P, Tang W, List JF. Long-term study of patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment shows that dapagliflozin reduces weight and blood pressure but does not improve glycemic control. Kidney Int. 2014; 85(4): 962–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mikhail N Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. South Med J. 2015; 108 (2): 91–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bode B, Stenlof K, Sullivan D, Fung A, Usiskin K. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract. 2013; 41 (2): 72–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Leiter LA, Cefalu WT, de Bruin TWA, Gause-Nilsson I, Sugg J, Parikh SJ. Dapagliflozin Added to Usual Care in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease: A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study with a 28-Week Extension. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62 (7): 1252–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yki-Jörvinen H, Dressler A, Ziemen M Less nocturnal hypoglycemia and better post-dinner glucose control with bedtime insulin glargine compared with bedtime NPH insulin during insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kirkman MS, Briscoe VJ, Clark N, Florez H, Haas LB, Halter JB, et al. Diabetes in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35 (12): 2650–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sherifali D, Bai J-W, Kenny M, Warren R, Ali MU. Diabetes self-management programmes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2015; 32(11): 1404–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Williams ME, Stanton R Kidney Disease in Elderly Diabetic Patients. In: Geriatric Nephrology Curriculum [Internet]. American Society of Nephrology; 2009. p. 1–5. Available from: https://www.asn-online.org/education/distancelearning/curricula/geriatrics/Chapter8.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Casagrande S, Cowie CC, Fradkin JE. Intensive glycemic control in younger and older U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hambling CE, Seidu SI, Davies MJ, Khunti K. Older people with Type 2 diabetes, including those with chronic kidney disease or dementia, are commonly overtreated with sulfonylurea or insulin therapies. Diabet Med. 2017; 34(9): 1219–1227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Munshi MN, Segal AR, Suhl E, Ryan C, Sternthal A, Giusti J, et al. Assessment of barriers to improve diabetes management in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36 (3): 543–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.American Diabetes Association. 11. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41 (Suppl 1): S119–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Meneilly GS, Knip A, Miller D, Sherifali D, Tessier DZA. Diabetes in older people [Internet]. Diabetes Canada Guidelines. 2018. [cited 2018 September 17]. Available from: http://guidelines.diabetes.ca/Browse/Chapter37 [Google Scholar]
  • 99.International Diabetes Federation. Managing older people with type 2 diabetes global guideline [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2018 September 27]. Available from: http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/IDF-Guideline-for-older-people-T2D.pdf

RESOURCES