Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Neuroscience
. 2019 Apr 11;13:349. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00349

Neurological Diseases With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Role of ASD Risk Genes

Juan Xiong 1,2,†, Shimeng Chen 1,2,†, Nan Pang 1,2, Xiaolu Deng 1,2, Lifen Yang 1,2, Fang He 1,2, Liwen Wu 1,2, Chen Chen 1,2, Fei Yin 1,2,*, Jing Peng 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6470315  PMID: 31031587

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is frequently comorbid with other neurological disorders such as intellectual disability (ID) or global development delay (GDD) and epilepsy. The pathogenesis of ASD is complex. So far, studies have identified more than 1000 ASD risk genes. Most of them were also reported to relate with other neurological diseases, and only several of them have been confirmed as pathogenic genes for autism. Little is known about the roles of these risk genes in neurological diseases with ASD. In the present study, we recruited a cohort of 158 neurological disorder probands with 163 variants of 48 ASD risk genes. Of these, 50 individuals (31.6%) were diagnosed with ASD. In the ASD patient subset, we identified several rarely reported candidate genes including DOLK, USH2A, and HUWE1. In a comparison of patients with neurological disorders with and without ASD, we found that ID/GDD was frequently comorbid with ASD whereas epilepsy was more common in the non-ASD group. Statistical analyses of all possible risk factors implicated that variants in synaptic genes, especially non-voltage-gated ion channel genes and in transcriptional and chromosome genes were related to ASD, but none of the investigated environmental factors was. Our results are useful for the future diagnosis and prognosis of patients with neurological disorders and emphasize the utility of genetic screening.

Keywords: autism risk gene, autism spectrum disorder, gene function, neurological diseases, risk factors

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a common neurodevelopmental disorder, is characterized by deficiency in social communication and interaction and restricted, repetitive behaviors (Lai et al., 2014). ASD is often associated with other neurological comorbidities such as epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID) (Yeargin-Allsopp et al., 2003; Sundelin et al., 2016). This phenomenon indicates a possible shared etiology between ASD and other neurological diseases. Recent studies have shown that neurological disorders such as epilepsy and ID are multifactorial and involve both genetic and environmental contributions (Chiurazzi and Pirozzi, 2016; Mazarati et al., 2017; Bozzi et al., 2018). The increasing prevalence of genetic testing has permitted the discovery of various relationships between multiple genes and various neurological disorders. ASD has 1007 risk genes as per the SFARI Gene database1, an evolving database of genes that are implicated in autism susceptibility. Few causative genes have been identified for ASD, including MECP2 and CHD8 (Li et al., 2017). Many other ASD-associated genes like CDKL5, SCN1A are also associated with epilepsy, ID, or other neurological syndromes (Weaving et al., 2004; Meng et al., 2015). Alternatively, several epidemiological studies have demonstrated the importance of environmental risk factors for ASD including advanced parental age; maternal smoking; pregnancy-related factors such as obesity and diabetes; and postnatal exposure to heavy metals, air pollutants, or other toxins (Modabbernia et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017).

Genetic mutations in ASD risk genes have been detected in children with a variety of nervous system disorders, including epilepsy and ID. Yet, only a proportion of these patients present with autistic traits, even when mutations occur in syndromic ASD genes such as TSC1 (Numis et al., 2011). Therefore, we examined possible molecular genetic and/or environmental factors driving phenotypic differences in these patients.

Here, we recruited 158 patients with neurological disorders and mutations in ASD risk genes in order to examine the contributions of genetic and environmental influences to the manifestation of ASD and neurological comorbidities.

Materials and Methods

Patients

We recruited 158 patients with nervous system disorders from the pediatric department of Xiangya Hospital at Central South University from 2014 to 2018. Their initial diagnoses included epilepsy, ID or global developmental delay (GDD), tuberous sclerosis complex, Rett syndrome, or other neurological disorder. All subjects have one or more pathogenic/likely pathogenic/uncertain significant variants in ASD risk genes. ASD risk genes were identified according to the SFARI Gene database2. We then adopted “genotype-first approach” to confirm the final diagnoses of patients (Stessman et al., 2014). All diagnoses were supported by the genetic results. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Xiangya Hospital Ethics Committee in accordance with Helsinki declaration, and informed consent was obtained from subjects and the parents or guardians of patients.

Follow-up was performed from the date of the genetic diagnosis to the date of a diagnosis of ASD or until June 1, 2018 (whichever occurred first) unless patients withdrew informed consent or died. Patients were evaluated for ASD in accordance with the DSM-V criteria by two experienced pediatric neurological doctors: (1) persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction; (2) restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities; (3) symptoms present in the early developmental period; (4) symptoms caused clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other critical areas of functioning; and (5) disturbances were not better explained by ID or GDD. The diagnostic procedure also included the assessment using a series of tools for neurological examination, mental status examination. Then, we divided the cohort into two groups: patients with ASD group (ASD group) and patients without ASD group (non-ASD group). Variant information for each gene and ASD environmental risk factors (i.e., parental age; maternal factors including obesity, diabetes, and caesarian section birth; and birth complications including hypoxia and intracranial hemorrhage, collected from a detailed patient history) were used to analyze differences between the two groups.

Capture Strategy, Sequencing, and Validation

All patients were subjected to peripheral blood genetic testing. Forty-four patients underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES), 67 patients underwent gene panel testing including panels for epilepsy, tuberous sclerosis complex, and neurofibromatosis, and 47 patients underwent clinical WES gene panel testing. The methods for sequencing and genetic testing have been described in detail in a previous study (Arafat et al., 2017; Peng et al., 2018). Candidate variants were filtered as per the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants (Richards et al., 2008) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing in probands and their parents, if genetic samples were available. Segregation analyses were also performed on family members.

Genetic Functional Grouping

The present study only included ASD risk genes confirmed by the SFARI Gene database. Many of these genes encode proteins related to synaptic formation, transcriptional regulation, and chromatin remodeling (De Rubeis et al., 2014). Combined with related literature and SFARI Gene database, mutated genes in this study were grouped into three categories: (1) synaptic genes: genes involved in synaptic function such as transmission, vesicle recycling, and synaptic plasticity (Auerbach et al., 2011; Santini et al., 2013); (2) transcriptional and chromatin genes: chromatin regulators and transcription factors that are essential for developmental processes, including ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers, chromatin modifiers, and other chromatin remodelers (Jenuwein and Allis, 2001; Ho and Crabtree, 2010; Torigoe et al., 2013); and (3) genes with other functions including metabolism-related genes (Helander et al., 2013; Rumsey et al., 2014). In order to identify the role of voltage-gated ion channels in patients with ASD, synaptic genes were further divided into two groups: genes encoding voltage-gated ion channels and genes encoding non-voltage-gated ion channels.

Statistics

Significant differences in initial diagnoses between the ASD and non-ASD groups were evaluated using Fisher’s exact tests. Significant differences in the presence of ASD were evaluated for each gene function group, each mutation type, and each possible environmental risk factor using Fisher’s exact tests for R × C matrix. The threshold for significance was p < 0.05. To control for multiple comparisons, we used the Benjamini–Yekutieli approach, which allows for dependent data structures, setting a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05.

Results

Segregation Analysis

This cohort included 158 cases of neurological disorders. Some of the patients were siblings, and they were patient B0019 and A0251, M003 and M0346 as well as M0334 and M0335. In total, 131 of the cases had undergone segregation analyses while others did not due to lack of the parental genetic samples. Among these 131 cases, 93 had de novo mutations. Six cases were detected with compound heterozygous mutations which were inherited from their healthy parents. Notably, proband M0332 had a de novo mutation and heterozygous mutation inherited from his healthy mother. Eleven probands had heterozygous mutations that were also detected in their affected parents. Moreover, 12 male children had a hemizygous variant of X-linked recessive genes derived from their normal mothers. Seven patients shared a heterozygous SCN1A (M0343, M0344, P0274, M0352, M0353, M0355) or SCN8A (M0358) mutation with their healthy parents respectively, which can be explained as incomplete penetrance. Besides, patient M0046 who had an STXBP1 mutation inherited from the healthy mother due to mosaicism as was reported in a previous research (Peng et al., 2018) (Supplementary Table S1).

Patient Phenotyping

Two subjects died during the follow-up period. Accordingly, the analysis included 156 patients with a mean age of 57.24 ± 32.37 months. The male to female ratio was 1.08 (81:75). Initial diagnoses before genetic testing included epilepsy (58 patients, 37.2%), epileptic encephalopathy (38 patients, 24.4%), ID/GDD (30 patients, 19.2%), both ID/GDD and epilepsy (IDE) (10 patients, 6.4%), febrile seizures, febrile seizures plus, or complex febrile seizures (7 patients, 4.5%), tuberous sclerosis (4 patients, 2.6%), and other nervous system diseases (9 patients, 5.8%) (Supplementary Table S1).

By June 1st, 2018, 50 (31.6%) of patients had been diagnosed as ASD or co-comorbid ASD. The ratio of sex in patients with ASD was 1:1. The average age at diagnosis of ASD was 55.58 ± 33.997 months (Supplementary Table S1). With regard to comorbid diseases with ASD, ID/GDD was more prevalent in the ASD group than in the non-ASD group (50.0% vs. 5.7%, p = 9.37 × 10-11). In contrast, epilepsy and epileptic encephalopathy were less present in the ASD group than in the non-ASD group (34.0% vs. 74.5%, p = 2.76 × 10-4) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Initial diagnosis of patients with neurological diseases with or without comorbid autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Initial diagnosis ASD group Non-ASD group Significance Odds Ratio
ID 25 6 p = 9.37 × 10-11 16.667
No ID 25 100
Epilepsy 17 79 p = 2.76 × 10-4   0.253
No epilepsy 33 27
Open in a new tab

Statistically significant findings are bolded. ID, intellectual disability.

Patient Genotyping

We detected 163 variants in 48 ASD risk genes. Only one mutated gene was identified as a pathogenic or likely pathogenic or uncertain significant gene in each subject. 157 variants in 44 ASD risk genes were likely pathogenic or pathogenic, and 6 variants of 4 genes are uncertain significant. 3/50 ASD group patients and 4/108 probands in the non-ASD group had more than one variants while the rest had only one variant each. The most frequently mutated gene was SCN1A (56, 35.4%), followed by CDKL5 (16, 10.1%), MECP2 (7, 4.4%), PCDH19 (4, 2.5%), ATP1A3 (4, 2.5%), NF1 (4, 2.5%), SCN8A (4, 2.5%), TSC2 (4, 2.5%), SCN2A (3, 1.9%), TSC1 (3, 1.9%), SMARCA2 (3, 1.9%), and STXBP1 (3, 1.9%) (Supplementary Table S1). Only 50 patients with 54 variants of 29 genes had autistic characteristics; these variants included 27 missense mutations, 9 nonsense mutations, 3 splice variants, 11 deletions, 2 duplications, and 2 insertions. The most common genes in this group were CDKL5 (8, 16%), MECP2 (7, 14%), SMARCA2 (3, 6%), SYNGAP1 (2, 4%), SLC6A1 (2, 4%), and UBE3A (2, 4%) (Supplementary Table S1). It is noteworthy that variants of USH2A, HUWE1, and DOLK were detected in patients with ASD, which has been rarely reported.

Gene Functions and Mutation Types in the ASD and Non-ASD Groups

Gene functional classifications and the numbers of genes in each group are shown in Tables 2, 3. A comparison of the ASD and non-ASD groups revealed significant differences among the 3 gene function groups (p = 2.63 × 10-7, FDR = 9.21 × 10-7). There was a higher proportion of patients with transcriptional and chromosomal gene mutations (Group b) in the ASD group (25/50, 50.0%) than in the non-ASD group (15/106, 14.2%) (p = 2.00 × 10-6, FDR = 3.5 × 10-6), while the contrary was observed for mutations in synaptic genes (Group a) (21/50, 42% vs. 89/106, 84.0%, respectively; p = 8.14 × 10-8, FDR = 5.70 × 10-7). Furthermore, the number of ASD patients between Group a and b had significant differences (Group a vs. Group b, p = 3.42 × 10-7, FDR = 7.98 × 10-7), but Group a and c(p = 1.91 × 10-2, FDR = 2.23 × 10-2), Group b and c (p = 1, FDR = 1) didn’t. Additionally, there was a higher proportion of ASD patients with mutations in non-voltage-gated ion channel genes than voltage-gated ion channel genes (67.4% vs. 23.8%, p = 2.56 × 10-4, FDR = 3.58 × 10-4) (Table 4).

Table 2.

Gene functional classifications by group.

Genotype grouping ASD group Non-ASD group
Synaptic genes ARHGEF9(2),
SCN1A(2),
CACNA1A(1),
SCN2A(1), CC2D1A(1),
SCN8A(1), SLC6A1(2),
SLC6A8(1),
SYNGAP1(2), TSC1(2),
TSC2(1), USH2A(1),
DYRK1A(1), UBE3A(2),
FRMPD4(1)		 ATP1A3(4), GRIN2B(1),
TSC1(1), KCNQ3(1),
SCN1A(54), TSC2(3), SCN2A(1),
SCN8A(2), SCN9A(2),
SLC30A3(1), STXBP1(3),
NF1(4), UBE3A(1), POMT1(3),
ITPR1(1), PCDH19(4), RELN(1),
PTEN(1),
CTNNB1(1)
Transcriptional and chromatin genes ARX(1), FOXG1(1),
MECP2(7), CDKL5(8),
MEF2C(1), HCFC1(1),
HUWE1(1), CHD8(1),
SMARCA2(3), ASXL3(1)		 CDKL5(8), AFF2(1), DEAF1(2),
ATRX(1), CHD2(3)
Others DOLK(1), OCRL(1),
SGSH(1), WDFY3(1)		 OCRL(1), SPAST(1)
Open in a new tab

ASD, autism spectrum disorder. Numbers indicate the numbers of patients with mutations in each gene.

Table 3.

Synaptic gene subgroups.

Ion channel-
related genes		 CACNA1A, SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN8A, KCNQ3, SCN9A
Non-ion channel-related genes ARHGEF9, CC2D1A, SLC6A1, SYNGAP1, TSC1, TSC2, USH2A,
DYRK1A, UBE3A, FRMPD4, GRIN2B, SLC30A3, STXBP1, NF1,
POMT1, PCDH19, RELN, PTEN, CTNNB1, ATP1A3, ITPR1,
SLC6A8
Open in a new tab

Table 4.

Gene functions of neurological diseases patients with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Gene functions ASD group Non-ASD group Significance Odds Ratio False Discovery Rate
Group a 21 89 p = 2.63 × 10-7 – 9.21 × 10-7
Group b 25 15
Group c 4 2
Group a 21 89 p = 8.14 × 10-8 0.138 5.70 × 10-7
Group b and Group c 29 17
Group b 25 15 p = 2.00 × 10-6 6.067 3.5 × 10-6
Group a and Group c 25 91
Group a 21 89 p = 3.42 × 10-7 0.142 7.98 × 10-7
Group b 25 15
Group a 21 89 p = 1.91 × 10-2 0.118 2.23 × 10-2
Group c 4 2
Group b 25 15 p = 1.000 0.833 1
Group c 4 2
Genes encoding voltage-gated ion channels 5 60 p = 2.56 × 10-4 0.151 3.58 × 10-4
Genes encoding non-voltage-gated ion channels 16 29
Open in a new tab

Statistically significant findings are bolded.

Missense variants accounted for a substantial percentage of genetic mutations in both the ASD and non-ASD groups (50.0% vs. 52.3%), whereas nonsense variants were less frequent (16.7% vs. 14.4%). There is an uptrend of the nonsense mutations’ proportion of synaptic genes (21.4% vs. 13.0%) in the ASD group than in the non-ASD group, although no statistical differences have been found (Table 5).

Table 5.

Mutation types of neurological diseases patients with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Mutation types ASD group Non-ASD group Significance Odds Ratio
All patients
Missense 27 58 p = 0.676 -
Nonsense 9 16
Deletion/duplication 13 22
Insertion 2 2
Splice 3 13
Synaptic genes
Missense 11 47 p = 0.274 0.620
Non-missense 17 45
Nonsense 6 12 p = 0.363 1.818
Non-nonsense 22 80
Open in a new tab

Statistically significant findings are bolded.

Environmental Factors in Patients With or Without Comorbid ASD by Gene Mutation

We compared parental bearing age, maternal factors, delivery type, and birth complications between 50 patients with ASD and 100 patients without ASD (the related information of 8 patients in non-ASD group was not available) in our cohort. No significant between-group differences were detected (Table 6).

Table 6.

Environmental risk factors in patients with neurological diseases with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Environmental risk factors ASD group Non-ASD group Significance Odds Ratio False Discovery Rate
Delivery mode
Cesarean section 23 43 p = 0.727 – 1.454
Natural labor 27 57
Maternal factors
Obesity 1 3 p = 1.000 – 1.0
No obesity 49 97
Birth complications
Hypoxia 2 9 p = 0.338 – 0.338
Normal 48 91
Other birth complications 43 86 p = 1.000 – 1.0
Normal 7 14
Paternal bearing age
> 30 years old 19 39 p = 0.926 – 0.926
≤30 years old 24 52
Maternal bearing age
>30 years old 14 20 p = 0.262 – 0.262
≤30 years old 31 70
Open in a new tab

Discussion

Our data combined next-generation sequencing results with segregation analysis demonstrates that 163 variants in 48 ASD risk genes underlie at or associated to a subset of neurological disease in children, but autistic traits are not observed in every individual. On comparison between probands with or without ASD, some interesting phenomenon were found that not only patients’ phenotypes but also their mutated genes can be the risk factors.

Unusual Sex Differences in Neurological Diseases in the ASD Group

Previous definitions of autism were very narrow. The newest DSM consolidated autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder together into ASD. The prevalence of ASD has an obvious sex bias and is widely accepted to have a 4-fold incidence in men compared to that in women (Fombonne, 2009; Werling and Geschwind, 2013). Interestingly, the sex ratio of probands with ASD in our cohort was 1:1. There are several possibilities underlying this observation. Firstly, ID/GDD was a common comorbidity in our ASD cohort (29/50 patients), and previous studies have indicated that intelligence level significantly influences the sex ratio of autism, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7:1 in patients with moderate-to-severe ID (Fombonne, 1999). Equally important, all subjects enrolled in the study had genetic mutations, which may have also contributed to the unusual sex ratio as women with autism have a higher rate of genetic variants than men with autism (Levy et al., 2011; Neale et al., 2012). Additionally, boys with externalizing behaviors including aggressive behavior, hyperactivity, and repetitive or restricted movements or interest (Hattier et al., 2011; Szatmari et al., 2012) are more frequently associated with ASD than girls with internalizing symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and other emotional manifestations (Bölte et al., 2011; Hattier et al., 2011; Mandy et al., 2012). Therefore, previously reported sex ratios might be offset by physician bias.

ASD Risk Gene Mutations in Pediatric Neurological Disorder Patients

Several studies have described comorbid epilepsy, developmental disorders, psychiatric disorders, and other diseases in patients with autism (Simonoff et al., 2008; Hofvander et al., 2009; Mattila et al., 2010). With advancements in genetic testing, several genes have been identified as common to different neurological disorders. For example, mutations in MECP2 have been detected in autism, ID, and epilepsy. A shared genetic basis for these disorders reflects the possibility of a common underlying mechanism. Additionally, overlap in the diagnostic criteria for these diseases may also explain a high frequency of comorbidity. A recent study showed that the prevalence of ASD has increased by 331% in 11 years (from 2000 to 2010) as a result of comorbidity with ID (Polyak et al., 2015).

In our cohort, ID and epilepsy were the two comorbid disorders most common with autism. A previous study reported that 70% of patients with autism had ID (Tuchman and Rapin, 2002), while the prevalence of autism with comorbid epilepsy has been estimated at 8–30% (Tuchman and Cuccaro, 2011). De Rubies and his colleagues also found that children with ID were more likely to develop ASD than those with epilepsy (De Rubeis et al., 2014). The similar conclusion could be obtained in our study, and we found that ID/GDD are more relevant with ASD than epilepsy. However, epilepsy coexisting with ID increases the likelihood of developing autistic features (Amiet et al., 2008). In our study, 6 of 10 patients with IDE (60%) were diagnosed with ASD. Since the sample size of the study is limited, we could not derive more useful conclusions on the relationships between other neurological diseases and ASD.

Genes Contributing to a Possible Common Monogenic Mechanism in ASD

Previous studies have identified numerous genes associated with ASD, many of which encode proteins for synaptic transmission, synaptic formation, transcriptional regulation, and chromatin remodeling (De Rubeis et al., 2014). In order to better understand the possible mechanisms or pathways linking neurological disorders with ASD, we classified subjects into 3 groups according to the biological functions of mutated genes. The results illustrated that ASD risk genes with transcriptional and chromosome functions often associated with autistic features, whereas the opposite was observed for synaptic genes. We further concluded that ASD patients were more likely to have variants in non-ion channel-related genes than in ion channel-related genes. In a way, these general findings can assist clinicians in determining whether autistic characteristics require further monitoring and additionally benefit research.

Notably, 35.4% of patients in our cohort had SCN1A mutations, which have been previously associated with a spectrum of seizure disorders. Furthermore, all 56 of these patients were diagnosed with Dravet syndrome. ASD with SCN1A variants was first reported in Weiss et al. (2003), and subsequently identified in a large ASD cohort (Roak et al., 2011; De Rubeis et al., 2014). Animal studies have confirmed that SCN1A haploinsufficiency is associated with stereotyped behaviors and social interaction deficits (Han et al., 2012). Only 2 individuals with SCN1A variants had autistic traits in our study. In these subjects, seizures occurred in the first years of life, and the autistic behavior was observed at the ages of 5 and 9 years, respectively. Few studies have evaluated the relationship between Dravet syndrome and ASD; thus, it is difficult to predict whether the other 54 probands in our study with Dravet syndrome are likely to develop comorbid ASD. In contrast, 50% of our cases with CDKL5 variants had ASD. This can be explained by the fact that CDKL5 mutations associated to neurodevelopment disorders that have an obvious Rett-like phenotype (Fehr et al., 2015).

Remarkably, some genes such as ARHGEF9(2), SMARCA2(4) were only detected in the ASD group but not in the non-ASD group while other genes like ATP1A3(4), STXBP1(3), POMT1(3), CHD2(3) were found in the non-ASD group. This phenomenon can be explained by the phenotype heterogeneity of the genes above; many of these genes were identified as candidate genes in ASD cohort studies but have also been implicated as causative genes for other neurological diseases. Therefore, it can be argued that ASD is not the usual clinical manifestation for these gene mutations. However, this could also be attributed to the imbalance of numbers in two groups. Studies involving much larger sample size are warranted.

Variation in the Clinical Phenotypes of Patients With ASD Risk Genes

Although 158 probands in our cohort had mutations in autism risk genes, only 50 presented with autistic characteristics. It is known that interactions between environmental exposures and genes contribute to the incidence of autism. Therefore, we hypothesized that there would be genetic or environmental differences between the ASD and non-ASD groups, but only statistical differences exist between genetic factor and autistic traits in neurological disorder patients in our study.

Several studies have demonstrated that the genetic architecture of autism is complicated, and genes related to autism are pleiotropic (Wang et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017). Of 163 variants in 48 ASD risk genes detected in this cohort, only 54 variants in 29 genes were associated with autistic traits. Gene mutation types in both groups were similar, but the percentage of nonsense mutations was higher in the ASD group than in the non-ASD group, specifically for synaptic genes (21.4% vs. 13.0%). Sanders et al. (2012) demonstrated significant enrichment of nonsense mutations in patients with ASD but not in unaffected siblings. With the limitation of our study, we cannot draw a more accurate conclusion, but the tendency can be reflected by our results. In the literature, non-synonymous de novo single nucleotide variants in the form of splice-site and frameshift mutations also play an essential part in autism (Neale et al., 2012; Sanders et al., 2012); however, splice-site mutations and frameshift indels were not significantly associated with ASD in our cohort. This divergent finding might be attributable to the objective and methods of our research compared to other studies, as we focused on the role of ASD risk genes in pediatric neurological disease. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to verify our results.

Epidemiological studies have identified various risk factors for ASD such as advanced paternal age (Lampi et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2017), birth complications, pregnancy-related factors, and postnatal exposure to toxins (Rossignol et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Yoshimasu et al., 2014; Curran et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016). In our study, there were no associations between potential environmental factors including parental age, cesarean section, birth complications, trauma, ischemia, hypoxia, and other exposures and ASD features. This may be related to the selection of subjects with known genetic mutations or a low number of subjects compared to that in larger previous studies and explain why our results are not in line with previous epidemiological findings.

Outlook for ASD Risk Genes in Patients With Neurological Disorders

Autism spectrum disorder is frequently associated with other neurological disorders. An increasing number of causative genes for other neurological diseases are identified as candidate genes for ASD. Yet, it remains unclear if and when patients with these genes present with autistic characteristics and how they should be treated.

The present findings indicate that nearly 1/3 individuals with a nervous system disorder and a mutation in an ASD risk gene also develop comorbid ASD, especially in patients with ID. Further results indicated that gene functions and mutation types could also be used to predict ASD. For example, patients with variants in non-voltage gated ion channel related synaptic genes and transcriptional and chromosome genes were more likely to have comorbid ASD in our cohort. Thus, we recommend the use of genetic screening in patients with neurological disease and especially ID in order to identify patients that need to be monitored closely for the development of ASD.

Ethics Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Xiangya Hospital Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from subjects and from the parents or guardians of patients.

Author Contributions

JX and SC played primary roles in study design, analyses, the literature review, and writing and revision of the manuscript. FH and CC collected the clinical data. NP and LW helped with the diagnosis of patients and the data analysis. XD and LY contributed to the qualitative coding and the writing of the manuscript. FY and JP conceptualized the study, led the literature search, and critically reviewed manuscript drafts for intellectual content.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFC1306202 and 2016YFC0904400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81771409, 81771408, 81701541, and 81671297).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2019.00349/full#supplementary-material

TABLE S1

Clinical features and genetic information of all subjects in the cohort.

Click here for additional data file. (42.7KB, XLSX)

References

  1. Amiet C., Gourfinkel-An I., Bouzamondo A., Tordjman S., Baulac M., Lechat P., et al. (2008). Epilepsy in autism is associated with intellectual disability and gender: evidence from a meta-analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 64 577–582. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.030! [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arafat A., Jing P., Ma Y., Pu M., Nan G., Fang H., et al. (2017). Unexplained early infantile epileptic encephalopathy in Han Chinese children: next-generation sequencing and phenotype enriching. Sci. Rep. 7:46227. 10.1038/srep46227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auerbach B. D., Osterweil E. K., Bear M. F. (2011). Mutations causing syndromic autism define an axis of synaptic pathophysiology. Nature 480 63–68. 10.1038/nature10658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bölte S., Duketis E., Poustka F., Holtmann M. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive domains and their clinical correlates in higher-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Autism 15 497–511. 10.1177/1362361310391116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bozzi Y., Provenzano G., Casarosa S. (2018). Neurobiological bases of autism-epilepsy comorbidity: a focus on excitation/inhibition imbalance. Eur. J. Neurosci. 47 534–548. 10.1111/ijlh.13595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chiurazzi P., Pirozzi F. (2016). Advances in understanding-genetic basis of intellectual disability. F1000Res. 5:599. 10.12688/f1000research.7134.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curran E. A., O’Neill S. M., Cryan J. F., Kenny L. C., Dinan T. G., Khashan A. S., et al. (2015). Research review: birth by caesarean section and development of autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry. 56 500–508. 10.1111/jcpp.12351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Rubeis S., He X., Goldberg A. P., Poultney C. S., Samocha K., Cicek A. E., et al. (2014). Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature 515 209–215. 10.1038/nature13772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fehr S., Leonard H., Ho G., Williams S., De Klerk N., Forbes D., et al. (2015). There is variability in the attainment of developmental milestones in the CDKL5 disorder. J. Neurodev. Disord. 7 1–13. 10.1186/1866-1955-7-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fombonne E. (1999). The epidemiology of autism: a review. Psychol. Med. 29 769–786. 10.1017/S0033291799008508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fombonne E. (2009). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatr. Res. 65 591–598. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819e7203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo H., Peng Y., Hu Z., Li Y., Xun G., Ou J., et al. (2017). Genome-wide copy number variation analysis in a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort. Sci. Rep. 10:44155. 10.1038/srep44155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Han S., Tai C., Westenbroek R. E., Yu F. H., Cheah C. S., Potter G. B., et al. (2012). Autistic behavior in Scn1a+/- mice and rescue by enhanced GABAergic transmission. Nature 489 385–390. 10.1038/nature11356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hattier M. A., Matson J. L., Tureck K., Horovitz M. (2011). The effects of gender and age on repetitive and/or restricted behaviors and interests in adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Res. Dev. Disabil. 32 2346–2351. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Helander A., Stödberg T., Jaeken J., Matthijs G., Eriksson M., Eggertsen G. (2013). Dolichol kinase deficiency (DOLK-CDG) with a purely neurological presentation caused by a novel mutation. Mol. Genet. Metab. 110 342–344. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ho L., Crabtree G. R. (2010). Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature 463 474–484. 10.1038/nature08911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hofvander B., Delorme R., Chaste P., Nydén A., Wentz E., Ståhlberg O., et al. (2009). Psychiatric and psychosocial problems in adults with normal-intelligence autism spectrum disorders. BMC Psychiatry 9:35. 10.1186/1471-244X-9-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenuwein T., Allis C. D. (2001). Translating the histone code. Science 293 1074–1080. 10.1126/science.1063127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lai M. C., Lombardo M. V., Baron-Cohen S. (2014). Autism. Lancet 383 896–910. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61539-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lampi K. M., Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki S., Lehti V., Helenius H., Gissler M., Brown A. S., et al. (2013). Parental age and risk of autism spectrum disorders in a Finnish national birth cohort. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43 2526–2535. 10.1007/s10803-013-1801-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Levy D., Ronemus M., Yamrom B., Lee Y. H., Leotta A., Kendall J., et al. (2011). Rare de novo and transmitted copy-number variation in autistic spectrum disorders. Neuron 70 886–897. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li J., Wang L., Guo H., Shi L., Zhang K., Tang M., et al. (2017). Targeted sequencing and functional analysis reveal brain-size-related genes and their networks in autism spectrum disorders. Mol. Psychiatry. 22 1282–1290. 10.1038/mp.2017.140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mandy W., Chilvers R., Chowdhury U., Salter G., Seigal A., Skuse D. (2012). Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: evidence from a large sample of children and adolescents. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 42 1304–1313. 10.1007/s10803-011-1356-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mattila M. L., Hurtig T., Haapsamo H., Jussila K., Kuusikko-Gauffin S., Kielinen M., et al. (2010). Comorbid psychiatric disorders associated with Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism: a community- and clinic-based study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 40 1080–1093. 10.1007/s10803-010-0958-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mazarati A. M., Lewis M. L., Pittman Q. J. (2017). Neurobehavioral comorbidities of epilepsy: role of inflammation. Epilepsia 58 48–56. 10.1111/epi.13786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meng H., Xu H. Q., Yu L., Lin G. W., He N., Su T., et al. (2015). The SCN1A mutation database: updating information and analysis of the relationships among genotype, functional alteration, and phenotype. Hum. Mutat. 36 573–580. 10.1002/humu.22782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Modabbernia A., Velthorst E., Reichenberg A. (2017). Environmental risk factors for autism: an evidence-based review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Mol. Autism 8 1–16. 10.1186/s13229-017-0121-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Neale B. M., Kou Y., Liu L., Ma A., Samocha K. E., Lin C., et al. (2012). Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 485 242–245. 10.1038/nature11011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Numis A. L., Major P., Montenegro M. A., Muzykewicz D. A., Pulsifer M. B., Thiele E. A. (2011). Identification of risk factors for autism spectrum disorders in tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology 76 981–987. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182104347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peng J., Pang N., Wang Y., Wang X. L., Chen J., Xiong J., et al. (2018). Next-generation sequencing improves treatment efficacy and reduces hospitalization in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 25 14–20. 10.1111/cns.12869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Polyak A., Kubina R. M., Girirajan S. (2015). Comorbidity of intellectual disability confounds ascertainment of autism: implications for genetic diagnosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 168 600–608. 10.1002/ajmg.b.32338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Richards C. S., Bale S., Bellissimo D. B., Das S., Grody W. W., Hegde M. R., et al. (2008). ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: revisions 2007. Genet. Med. 10 294–300. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b5cae [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roak B. J., Deriziotis P., Lee C., Vives L., Schwartz J. J., Girirajan S., et al. (2011). Exome sequencing in spordic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations. Nat. Genet. 43 585–589. 10.1038/ng.835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rossignol D. A., Genuis S. J., Frye R. E. (2014). Environmental toxicants and autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Transl. Psychiatry 4:e360. 10.1038/tp.2014.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rumsey R. K., Rudser K., Delaney K., Potegal M., Whitley C. B., Shapiro E. (2014). Acquired autistic behaviors in children with mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA. J Pediatr. 164 1147–1151. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanders S. J., Murtha M. T., Gupta A. R., Murdoch J. D., Raubeson M. J., Willsey A. J., et al. (2012). De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 485 237–241. 10.1038/nature10945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Santini E., Huynh T. N., MacAskill A. F., Carter A. G., Pierre P., Ruggero D., et al. (2013). Exaggerated translation causes synaptic and behavioural aberrations associated with autism. Nature 493 411–415. 10.1038/nature11782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Simonoff E., Pickles A., Charman T., Chandler S., Loucas T., Baird G. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 47 921–929. 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stessman H. A., Bernier R., Eichler E. E. (2014). A genotype-first approach to defining the subtypes of a complex disease. Cell 156 872–877. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sundelin H. E., Larsson H., Lichtenstein P., Almqvist C., Hultman C. M., Tomson T., et al. (2016). Autism and epilepsy: a population-based nationwide cohort study. Neurology. 87 192–197. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Szatmari P., Liu X. Q., Goldberg J., Zwaigenbaum L., Paterson A. D., Woodbury-Smith M., et al. (2012). Sex differences in repetitive stereotyped behaviors in autism: implications for genetic liability. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 159B, 5–12. 10.1002/ajmg.b.31238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Torigoe S. E., Patel A., Khuong M. T., Bowman G. D., Kadonaga J. T. (2013). ATP-dependent chromatin assembly is functionally distinct from chromatin remodeling. Elife 2:e00863. 10.7554/eLife.00863.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tuchman R., Cuccaro M. (2011). Epilepsy and autism: neurodevelopmental perspective. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 11 428–434. 10.1007/s11910-011-0195-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tuchman R., Rapin I. (2002). Epilepsy in autism. Lancet Neurol. 1 352–358. 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00160-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang T., Guo H., Xiong B., Stessman H. A., Wu H., Coe B. P., et al. (2016). De novo genic mutations among a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort. Nat. Commun. 7:13316. 10.1038/ncomms13316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang Y., Tang S., Xu S., Weng S., Liu Z. (2016). Maternal body mass index and risk of autism spectrum disorders in offspring: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 6 1–8. 10.1038/srep34248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weaving L. S., Christodoulou J., Williamson S. L., Friend K. L., McKenzie O. L. D., Archer H., et al. (2004). Mutations of CDKL5 cause a severe neurodevelopmental disorder with infantile spasms and mental retardation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75 1079–1093. 10.1086/426462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Weiss L. A., Escayg A., Kearney J. A., Trudeau M., MacDonald B. T., Mori M., et al. (2003). Sodium channels SCN1A, SCN2A and SCN3A in familial autism. Mol. Psychiatry 8 186–194. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Werling D. M., Geschwind D. H. (2013). Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 26 146–153. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835ee548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu S., Wu F., Ding Y., Hou J., Bi J., Zhang Z. (2017). Advanced parental age and autism risk in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 135 29–41. 10.1111/acps.12666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu G., Jing J., Bowers K., Liu B., Bao W. (2014). Maternal diabetes and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in the offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44 766–775. 10.1007/s10803-013-1928-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yeargin-Allsopp M., Rice C., Karapurkar T., Doernberg N., Boyle C., Murphy C. (2003). Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area. JAMA. 289 49–55. 10.1001/jama.289.1.49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yoshimasu K., Kiyohara C., Takemura S., Nakai K. (2014). A meta-analysis of the evidence on the impact of prenatal and early infancy exposures to mercury on autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the childhood. Neurotoxicology. 44 121–131. 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.06.0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

TABLE S1

Clinical features and genetic information of all subjects in the cohort.

Click here for additional data file. (42.7KB, XLSX)

Articles from Frontiers in Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES