Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2019 Mar 16;20(6):1332. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061332

Immunopathogenic Mechanisms and Novel Immune-Modulated Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Shyi-Jou Chen 1,2,3,4, Gu-Jiun Lin 5, Jing-Wun Chen 6, Kai-Chen Wang 7,8, Chiung-Hsi Tien 1,4, Chih-Fen Hu 1,4, Chia-Ning Chang 1,3, Wan-Fu Hsu 1,3, Hueng-Chuen Fan 1,9, Huey-Kang Sytwu 2,4,6,10,*
PMCID: PMC6470801  PMID: 30884802

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by the presence of rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated peptide antibodies. The orchestra of the inflammatory process among various immune cells, cytokines, chemokines, proteases, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and reactive oxidative stress play critical immunopathologic roles in the inflammatory cascade of the joint environment, leading to clinical impairment and RA. With the growing understanding of the immunopathogenic mechanisms, increasingly novel marked and potential biologic agents have merged for the treatment of RA in recent years. In this review, we focus on the current understanding of pathogenic mechanisms, highlight novel biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMRADs), targeted synthetic DMRADs, and immune-modulating agents, and identify the applicable immune-mediated therapeutic strategies of the near future. In conclusion, new therapeutic approaches are emerging through a better understanding of the immunopathophysiology of RA, which is improving disease outcomes better than ever.

Keywords: anticitrullinated peptide antibodies, antirheumatic drug, autoimmune, disease-modifying, immunology, pathology, rheumatoid factor

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most widespread chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, with a prevalence of 5–10 cases per 1000 people. It causes joint destruction, pain, and disability [1,2].

1.1. Characteristics

The initial symptoms of RA are swelling and pain in the joints of the hands and feet, especially in the metacarpophalangeal, metatarsophalangeal, and proximal interphalangeal joints. Large joints including the elbow, shoulder, ankle, and knee can also be involved [2]. Without adequate treatment, RA progresses to symmetric polyarthritis and destroys the diarthrodial joints of the hands and knees, leading to disability, inability, and mortality.

1.2. Current Therapeutics

Patients with RA should receive treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The definition of a DMARD is a medicine that interferes with signs and symptoms of RA, improves physical function, and inhibits the progression of joint damage [3]. Conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) have been approved by licensing authorities via empiric clinical observation and have been used for more than 50 years. Methotrexate has been applied for treatment of RA for over 50 years, and even now, methotrexate is the most important of the csDMARDs. If intolerance, contraindications, adverse effects, or inadequate response occur in patients with RA treated with csDMARDs such as methotrexate, then a biologic DMARD and a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) have superior efficacy when combined with methotrexate or another csDMARDs, compared with individual use [2]. Currently, IL-6R antibodies and JAK inhibitors are the most efficacious of the biologic DMARDs [4].

1.3. Limitations and Unmet Medical Needs

There are still unmet needs in RA treatment; full or stringent remission is not typical, nor is remission usually sustained without continuing treatment, which should now be the priority of research efforts [5]. Another concern is that biologic DMARDs and tsDMARDs are costly.

In this review, we focus on the current understanding of the immunopathogenic mechanisms that cause dysregulation of the inflammatory process leading to structural damage of bone and cartilage in patients with RA. Accordingly, understanding the immune-pathogenic mechanism is pivotal to the development of novel immune-mediated therapies.

2. Part I: Immunopathogenic Mechanisms in RA

In the inflammatory process of RA, the cascade responses of innate and adaptive immunity are the essential immune-pathogenic mechanisms [6]. This development is driven by a plethora of inflammatory cytokines and autoantibodies and is sustained by epigenetic changes in fibroblast-like synoviocytes, supporting further inflammation [7,8]. In the intermediate course, large numbers of different immune cells, including neutrophils, granulocytes, macrophages, B-cells, and T-cells invade the synovial membrane and fluid. This invasion results in tremendous releases of cytokines, chemokines, autoantibodies, and reactive oxidative stress (ROS) in the synovial membrane and space, leading to joint destruction. The serological hallmark of the disease is the presence of a high-titer of rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated peptide antigen and antibodies (ACPAs) [9,10]. Additionally, Vande Walle et al. confirmed that the pathology of RA is strongly related to increased Nlrp3 inflammasome activation in vivo [11]. We discuss this complex mechanism further.

2.1. Role of Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells

Primary Immune Cells: Macrophages, Neutrophils, and Dendritic Cells in RA

Synovial membrane inflammation reflects consequent immune activation and is characterized by leukocyte invasion by innate immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and adaptive immune cells including Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, B-cells, and plasma cell lineages [5,12,13].

Both macrophages and neutrophils belong to the subset of phagocytes, which play the first defensive role against pathogens [12,14]. Macrophages contribute to the modulation of the immune response, which initiates immune-mediated inflammation leading to autoimmune disorders [15]. According to their microenvironment, macrophages can be divided into two distinct subsets with different physiological functions, one is proinflammatory subtype (M1), and the other is anti-inflammatory subtype (M2) [16,17].

Several proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ are regulated at the transcriptional level and secreted through the endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi pathway. Interestingly, other proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-18, are formed as cytosolic precursors, and their secretion is controlled by inflammatory caspases (caspase-1, -4, and -5) in humans [18]. These caspases are activated within cytosolic multimolecular complexes named inflammasomesin the milieu of the macrophage [19]. These intracellular inflammasomes that induce inflammatory responses in macrophages are activated by different types of ligands, leading tothe induction of inflammatory responses. The hallmark of inflammatory responses is the activation of inflammasomes—multiprotein oligomers containing intracellular pattern recognition receptors and inflammatory effectors—such as caspase recruitment domain (ASC) and pro-caspase-1and subsequently IL-1β andIL-18 is secreted from active macrophagein caspase-1-dependent manner [20].

And inflammasomes are classifiedinto three types: (1) ‘canonical inflammsomes’, such as nucleotide-bindingoligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs); (2) absentin melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasomes; (3): ‘non-canonicalinflammasomes’, such as caspase-4, -5, and -11 [21]. Remarkably, the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family pyrin domaincontaining 3 (NLRP3) inflammasone is emerging as an important factor in the inflammatory process of RA [19].

NLRP3 inflammasomes are highly activated in the infiltration of monocytes and macrophages in synovia but not in fibroblast-like synoviocytes from either RA patients or mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). This activation pattern suggests a pathogenic role for NLRP3 inflammasomes in RA. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes was correlated with disease activity and IL-17A concentration in RA sera. Knockdown of NLRP3 suppressed Th17 differentiation MCC950, a selective NLRP3 inhibitor, had proven therapeutic effects in CIA in a murine RA model. MCC950-treated mice with CIA revealed significantly less severe joint inflammation and bone destruction. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the synovia was significantly inhibited by MCC950, with reduced production of interleukin (IL)-1β [22]. Accordingly, the NLRP3 inflammasome could be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of RA.

It is notable that the regulatory potential of caspase-11 in inflammatory responses during RA pathogenesis has been focused recently [20]. SinceLacey et al. disclosed the role of caspase-11 and its downstream effectors on inflammatory responses and infectious condition in the model of bacteria—induced inflammatory arthritis via caspase-11 knockout mice and proved that caspase-11 and caspase-1 induced proinflammatory cytokine production and joint inflammation in bacteria-infected arthritis mice, and delayed joint inflammation was observed in caspase-11 knockout mice alternatively. In addition, these results suggest that caspase-11 inflammasome in an IL-18-dependent manner induces the inflammatory responses and pathogenesisof joint inflammation in inflammatory arthritis [23].

Similar with canonical inflammasomes, non-canonical inflammasomesstimulate caspase-1 activation and GSDMD cleavage through the formation of cell membrane pores and caspase-1-mediated maturation and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, suggesting that targeting of the non-canonical inflammasomes and their downstream effectors, such as caspase-11, caspase-1, GSDMD, and proinflammatory cytokines, could be considered as potential targets to suppress inflammatory responses, thus treat inflammatory diseases [20].

Given the existing evidence on the regulatory roles of either canonical or non-canonical inflammasomes during inflammatory responses, selective targeting of these inflammasomes by novel pharmacological approaches may potentially be applied clinically to prevent and treat various human inflammatory diseases including RA [20,24].

2.2. Dendritic Cells in RA

Dendritic cells in their role as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are essential in inducing immunity and in mediating immune tolerance. Dendritic cells are now known to influence many different classes of lymphocytes (T, B, and NK cells) and many types of T-cell responses (Th1/Th2/Th17, regulatory T-cells, peripheral T-cell deletion) [25,26]. Dendritic cells have been investigated extensively in RA pathogenesis and have been implicated in RA [25]. The role of dendritic cells has been studied broadly in the pathogenesis of RA [27]. However, it remains unclear whether dendritic cells initiate autoimmunity in this disease [28].

Fully mature dendritic cells express high levels of MHC class II, costimulatory markers (CD86), proinflammatory cytokines (IL-12p70, IL-23, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)), all of which are required for the efficient induction of T effector cell responses. Furthermore, the expression of chemokine receptors is controlled during the process of dendritic cell maturation, which enables dendritic cell migration toward lymphoid tissues to present antigen to naïve T-cells. For example, CCR5 is expressed on immature dendritic cells, which is down-regulated during cell maturation; alternatively, CCR7 is overexpressed in maturing dendritic cells [29]. On the other hand, specific repressive molecular patterns with immune suppressive compounds reveal a part of the maturation of dendritic cells with tolerogenic properties. These tolerogenic dendritic cells are considered “semi-mature.” They may be phenotypically mature and exhibit high levels of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules but may express co-inhibitory molecules such as programmed death-ligands 1 and, 2, and immunoglobulin-like transcript 3; they may also characteristically produce immunosuppressive molecules including IL-10, TGF-β, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Hence, they have plasticity regarding the functional maturation of dendritic cells, and environmental cues are essential for dendritic cells in the maturation process to determine whether they become immunogenic or tolerogenic [30,31,32]. Currently, tolerogenic dendritic cells are under investigation in clinical trials and could be applied clinically for RA treatment in the future [28,33].

2.2.1. T-Cells, B-Cells, and Cytokine Milieu in RA

T-cells also play a critical role in immune-mediated inflammation of RA. As the disease progresses, activated T-cells aggregate in inflamed joints in experimental CIA models of RA [34,35]. Naïve CD4 T helper (Th) cells can differentiate into distinct lineages (Th1, Th2, and Th17) that are characterized by lineage-specific expression of transcription factors and proinflammatory cytokines upon antigenic stimulation [36,37].

Before the era of proven Th17 cells, the imbalance of Th1 and Th2 was considered the central regulatory mechanism of adaptive immunity in autoimmune diseases including RA. Several studies have revealed that Th1 cells are found predominantly in RA joints [38]; alternatively, down-regulation of the Th1 response in experimental arthritis increased the Th2 response [39].

Since the discovery of Th17 cells more than one decade ago, their significance in RA has gradually emerged [40]. Human Th17 cell development is regulated by a transcription factor and RAR-related orphan receptor C. These cells express IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, IL-26, TNF-α, GM-CSF, andCCL20 [41,42], which play specific roles in the immune response and exhibit synergetic effects [13,40]. The increased amounts of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells are demonstrated [13,43], while that of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) suppresses disease severity in CIA [44]. In addition, Tregs are reduced in the blood of RA patients [45]. The dysregulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells influences the autoimmune progression, depending on the presence of autoreactive Th1 and Th17 CD4+ T-cells, leading to RA immunopathology and disease development [45].

2.2.2. B-Cells in RA

Citrullinated antigen-directed B-cells of patients with RA and reacted with citrullinated antigens have a substantial in vitro effect [46]. This citrullinated antigen-directed B-cell response contributes to the initiation and persistence of the inflammatory process. Therefore, anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) response is the primary humoral immune response associated with RA [10,47]. Accordingly, the biologic DMRADs for targeting B-cells was developed as the initial priority that is reviewed in this article.

Abnormal kinetics among immune cells results in an aberrant orchestra of activated T-cells, B-cells, mast cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and access APCs (i.e., dendritic cells), all of which contribute to the cellular immune responses of the RA disease process [48].

2.2.3. Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Milieu in RA

The initial effector cells of RA are neutrophils that release high levels of oxidants and cytotoxic products, such as ROS, and inflammatory agents including TNF-α, proteases, phospholipases, defensins, and myeloperoxidase at the site of acute RA in the affected joint. In chronic inflammation of RA, Th17 cells are involved in the induction of tissue inflammation by stimulation from recruited neutrophils. Reciprocally, these activated Th17 cells generate neutrophil chemoattractants such as IL-8 and TNF-α in the joint [49,50,51,52]. Neutrophils in the joint then facilitate the activation of Th17 cells through the secretion of Th17-maintaining chemokines CCL20 and CCL2 [53]. Likewise, neutrophils play a role in the activation of NK cells. The depletion of neutrophils can impair maturation, function, and homeostasis of NK cells [54]. Macrophages, while activated, play another crucial role in the inflammatory course of RA, and these cells, which are highly plastic, can polarize into either the M1 or M2 phenotype; M1 cells secrete proinflammatory cytokines, whereas M2 cells secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines [55,56].

M1 macrophages produce proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-23, and low levels of IL-10 and inflammatory enzymes in the process of promoting acute RA. M1 macrophages also release inflammatory chemokines including CXCL5, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL13 to recruit further leukocytes to the inflammatory site, and these cells produce more IL-1β, TNF-α IL-6, MMP, chemokine receptors, ROS, and inducible nitric oxide synthase in the joint, leading to joint destruction [49,57]. An evolutionary ancient inflammatory proteincalled high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) rapidly activates APCs and activates innate and adaptive immune responses. This protein has been studied in patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis [58]. The risk factors associated with HMGB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms have been demonstrated in the development of RA disease among the Chinese Han population [59]. Thus, HMGB1 may be an emerging target for RA therapy.

The dominant function of M2 macrophages is anti-inflammation. Thus, M2 macrophages remodel and repair tissue by the production of IL-10, IL-12, and expression of CD163, and CD206, as well as releasing growth factors such as TGF-β and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) during chronic inflammation [60,61]. Calreticulin (CRT), an endoplasmic reticulum residential glycoprotein, plays a crucial role in maintaining intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Soluble CRT accumulates in the blood of RA patients [62]. In addition, soluble oligomerized CRT could have a pathogenic function in autoimmune diseases through the induction of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-6) by macrophages via the MAPK-NF-κB signaling pathway [63]. This phenomenon implies soluble CRT has pathologic capability in RA, which could provide a strategy for a new therapeutic approach to RA.

The importance of the crosstalk between T-cells and monocytes in promoting inflammation is growing [64]. Remarkably, in RA, the receptors for IL-17 (IL-17RA and IL-17RC) are found in the synovium and are expressed on CD14+monocytes and macrophages, whereas synoviocytes bind with IL-17 to induce stimulation of further inflammation and production of IL-6 and MMPs in the synovium [61,65]. In addition, monocytes and macrophages from the synovial fluid of the inflamed arthritic joint can promote IL-17 production in CD4+ T-cells [66], suggesting that subsequently recruited CD4+T-cells in the rheumatoid joint can develop into a Th17 lineage in association with residential monocytes and macrophages. Consequently, a reciprocal synchronous loop between Th17 cells and monocytes and macrophages enables inflammation [13,67]. Regulatory T-cells (Tregs) are key participants in the regulation of various immune responses. Tregs have the potential to direct macrophages to develop into the M2 phenotype, with the functional and phenotypic characteristics of immune modulators [68]. Tregs express novel surface receptors Tregs such as neuropilin-1, CD83, and G protein-coupled receptor 83, which have advanced our understanding of Treg modulating mechanisms [69]. Thus, to target T-cell-macrophage interactions may have therapeutic potential in RA.

IL-6 and IL6R contribute to IL-6 blockade therapy currently on RA [70,71]. IL-6 is produced by a variety of cells such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, chondrocytes, some tumor cells, and immune cells including monocytes, macrophages, T-cells, and B-cells. IL-6 receptor is assembled from two subunits. One is IL-6-specific receptor (IL-6R), and the other is a signal transducer (gp130). Both the subunits exist in membrane-bound and soluble forms, named mIL-6R, sIL-6R, mgp130, and s130, respectively. However, mIL-6R is expressed only on some leukocytes while gp130 is found on many cells in body. IL-6 binds to mIL-6R, and the complex subsequently associates with signal transducing molecule gp130, which induces the activation of downstream signaling events in target cells via Janus kinase. This association leads to classic proinflammatory signaling. Alternatively, sIL-6R, without transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions converts to the anti-inflammatory pathway [8,72]. High levels of IL-6 have been detected in the blood and synovial fluid of most patients with RA. IL-6 facilities neutrophils to secrete ROS and proteolytic enzymes, which augment inflammation and eventually damage joints [73]. IL-6 causes inflammation and joint destruction by acting on neutrophils that secrete reactive oxygen intermediates and proteolytic enzymes. In addition, IL-6 stimulates osteoclast differentiation by activation of either RANKL-dependent or RANKL-independent mechanisms [74].

IL-6 enhances production of chemokines such as monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and IL-8 from endothelial cells, mononuclear cells, and fibroblast-like synoviocytes; it also induces adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1 in endothelial cells and induces increased adhesion of monocytes to endothelial cells in RA [75,76]. The synergistic effect of IL-6 with IL-1β and TNF-α stimulate the production of VEGF, which is an essential cytokine in the organization and maintenance of pannus [77].

Thus, knowledge and understanding of new and updated immunopathologic mechanisms could elicit the design and discovery of novel therapeutic and immune-modulatory agents to improve the life quality and disease control in RA.

3. Part II: Current Immune Target Therapy and on-Going Immune-Modulated Therapy in RA

By definition, DMARDs target inflammatory processes and lessen subsequent damage in diseasessuch asRA [5]. Monoclonal antibodies have been used extensively over the past two decades in clinical trials of RA treatments. TNFα–blocking monoclonal antibodies have been clinically proven and applied in patients with RA. However, the response period is limited [78]. Subsequently, many biologic and immune targeting agents have emerged with therapeutic effects in patients with RA. Furthermore, DMARDs cocktails mixed with several monoclonal antibodies or immune-modulated agents have been pre-clinically or clinically tested for inducing disease remission and maintenance [79].

Inspiringly, several biologic agents targeting cytokines and cytokine networks have achieved significant successes in RA treatment. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 expressed on the surface of B-cells for depletion of B-cell, has been used in RA for more than one decade. Five TNF-α targeting biologic drugs are approved for treatment of RA, including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, pegol, and golimumab. Nonetheless, a substantial minority of patients with RA do not respond to these medications, which has necessitated the development of other biologic agents. Currently, tocilizumab, an anti-IL6R mAb; abatacept, a soluble fusion protein that consists of the extracellular domain of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 linked to the modified Fc portion of IgG1, which interferes with T-cell activation; and tofacitinib, a Janus kinase class inhibitor that inhibits intracellular signaling are in clinical use [71].

We review the success of these therapeutic agents and potential strategies for RA treatment.

3.1. B-Cell Targeting Therapy

The first randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of rituximab was completed in 2004 for patients with long-standing active RA, despite methotrexate treatment, or in combination with either cyclophosphamide or continued methotrexate, with significant improvement [80]. In addition, the efficacy and safety of different rituximab doses plus methotrexate, with or without glucocorticoids, in patients with active RA who did not respond to conventional DMARDs were tried in one clinical study. Either low or high dosages of rituximab were effective and well tolerated [81,82]. One concern is that serum sickness may occur following a first rituximab infusion without recurrence after the second infusion [83].

In patients with RA with an insufficient response to anti-TNF-α therapy, a single course of rituximab with methotrexate provided a significant improvement in disease activity and clinical progression of radiological damage [84]. An open-label prospective study further confirmed that rituximab is a treatment option for patients who do not respond to a single dose of TNF-α inhibitor, particularly for seropositive patients(patients with positive anti-CCP or RF) [85].

3.2. Anti-TNF-α Therapy

The strategy for blocking TNF-α was introduced to clinical practice at the end of the last century and revolutionized the treatment of RA as well as many other inflammatory conditions. Steeland et al. recently conducted an impressive review of successful anti-RA therapeutics with TNF-inhibitors (TNFi), including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, pegol, and golimumab [86]. Infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab are full-length monoclonal antibodies, and thus, apart from their general TNF-blockage properties, they have Fc-effector activity as well. They can induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and trigger the complement pathway leading to cell-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and apoptosis of target immune cells. Etanercept, a soluble TNF receptor, contains a truncated Fc-domain without the CH1 domain of IgG1; therefore, the potency of etanercept to induce ADCC and CDC is less than that of monoclonal antibodiessuch asinfliximab [87]. Certolizumab pegol, is a Fab’ fragment, and its structure is incapable of inducing ADCC and CDC; therefore, its functioning mechanism is not dependent on the complement pathway [86,88].

Notably, Nguyen et al. demonstrated that adalimumab, but not etanercept, paradoxically promoted the interaction between monocytes and Tregs isolated from patients with RA. Adalimumab bound to monocyte membrane TNF and surprisingly enhanced its expression and its binding to TNF-RII expressed on Tregs. Consequently, adalimumab expanded functional Foxp3(+) T reg cells capable of suppressing Th17 cells through an IL-2/STAT5-dependent mechanism [89].

Total B-cell numbers are reduced in the blood of patients with RA vs. healthy controls but are significantly higher (normal levels) in patients undergoing anti–TNFα therapy. Cardiovascular disease, including heart failure and infections, represent the leading causes of disability and mortality in patients with RA [90]. Patients treated with anti–TNFα antibody alone or with methotrexate seem to be at further risk of severe infection such as tuberculosis [91,92]. As a result, the anti-TNFα treatment is contraindicated in all patients with heart failure and a substantial portion of patients with RA and impaired heart function who do not benefit from the treatment [93].

Nonetheless, anti–TNFα therapies are widely and successfully used despite the risk of serious adverse events. Presently, anti-TNF therapies are initiated as the standard-of-care in RA patients when methotrexate treatment fails to provide relief. TNF-inhibitors combined with methotrexate are used in the treatment of 70–80% of RA cases [86,94].

3.3. Anti-IL-12/IL-23 Therapy

TGF-β, IL-23, and proinflammatory cytokines function to drive and modulate human Th17 responses in RA [95,96]. Moreover, increased Th17 cell numbers and poor clinical outcomes in RA patients are associated with a genetic variant in the IL4R gene [97]. Accordingly, IL-12 and IL-23 are implicated in the pathogenesis of RA and may be considered candidate molecules for immune targeting in RA. Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-12/23 p40 subunit, which, in clinical trials, has inhibited both IL-12 and IL-23 activity and is effective in relieving moderate-to-severe psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis [98,99].

Guselkumab is a new monoclonal antibody targeting IL-23 and is effective for psoriasis relief in a clinical trial [100]. The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab and guselkumab were studied in adults with active RA regardless of methotrexate therapy. However, targeting of IL-12/IL-23 p40 (ustekinumab) and IL-23 alone (guselkumab) were not proved yet in RA treatments [101].

3.4. Anti-IL6 Signaling Therapy

IL-6 is a kind of cytokine with multi-biological functions that include regulation of immune reaction, inflammation, and hematopoietic effects. IL-6 possesses quite a lot of proinflammatory characters, such as stimulating the production of chemokines and adhesion molecules in lymphocytes [4], and increasing neutrophil numbers in the blood [6].

Tocilizumab, humanized anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) monoclonal antibody, is highly efficacious for the treatment of intractable autoimmune inflammatory diseases, including RA and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in clinical trials [70].

Tofacitinib is a novel, oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-mediated by JAK1 and JAK3 to regulate STAT1 and STAT3 through the IL-6/gp130/STAT3 signaling pathway. Tofacitinib has been shown to amelirate arthritis symptoms effectively in patients with RA, and oral tofacitinib is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of RAand approved by the EMA [74,102]. Moreover, tofacitinib down-regulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-17 and IFN-γ and the proliferation of CD4+ T-cells in patients with RA [103,104].

Global data has shown that patients with RA and inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNFα therapy can often be effectively managed by switching to a drug with a novel mechanism of action, such as an IL-6R inhibitor [105]. Blockade of IL-6 signaling (via a monoclonal antibody to the IL-6 receptor, tocilizumab) reportedly boosts Tregs and inhibit monocyte IL-6 mRNA expression, inducing monocyte apoptosis [106,107,108,109]. Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6R, has shown efficacy and safety in patients with active RA with an inadequate response to methotrexate in a randomized clinical trial [110,111]. Furthermore, in a phase III clinical trial, sarilumab has shown effectiveness in RA patients with an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Sarilumab plus csDMARDs significantly decreased circulating biomarkers and synovial inflammation and bone resorption, including C1M, C3M, CXCL13, MMP-3 tRANKL levels, and sICAM-1 [112].

Baricitinib is a novel oral, once-daily targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) that inhibits JAK1 and JAK2. JAK1 and JAK2 are involved in the immunopathogenesis of RA by increasing the turnover of active, phosphorylated STAT1 and STAT3, and preventing chemotaxis toward IL-8. Baricitinib is approved in the FDA, EU and Japan for the treatment of patients with moderate or severe active RA who did not respond well or were intolerant of csDMARD(s) [48,113,114].

3.5. Anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen 4 Therapy

CTLA4-immunoglobulin (Ig) (abatacept) is a fusion protein containing components of IgG and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 that inhibit costimulatory signals from APCs distinctively impairing T-cell costimulatory signals by binding to CD80 and CD86 receptors on APCs to target the interaction between monocytes and T-cells and prevent T-cell activation [115]. Abatacept significantly reduced disease severity and enhanced physical function in RA patients who experienced inadequate responses to methotrexate and TNFi [61,116]. Nonetheless, some patients did not respond to abatacept. They had an increased proportion of CD28-cells among CD4+ cells suggesting that CD4+ CD28+ Tfh-like cells could be targets of abatacept. Therefore, the presence of CD4+ CD28−cells may be a potential predictor of abatacept resistance [117].

3.6. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells in RA

Tregs play an essential role in maintaining immune tolerance. Restoration of Treg function is a promising target for clinical intervention in autoimmune diseases. One treatment method is reloading the Treg pool in autoimmune patients with functional Tregs, either by treating the patients with drugs that selectively expand the Treg population in vivo or by generating new Tregs ex vivo before infusing them into the patient [118]. The challenge of Treg therapy is how to achieve the expansion of antigen-specific Tregs and how to determine the appropriate antigen(s) to activate the Tregs. One remarkable strategy that is developing is using tolerogenic dendritic cells to induce Tregs that are active against heat-shock proteins (HSPs) ubiquitously expressed in inflamed target tissues [119].

Interestingly, HSP 60 is expressed in the synovial membranes of patients with RA, and monoclonal antibodies that recognize mammalian HSP 60 were detected in patients with chronic arthritis. Similar results were noted for the HSP family members HSP 40 and HSP 70 in synovial fluid and on circulating T-cells of patients. The strategy is to pulse tolerogenic dendritic cells with targeted HSP peptides to generate HSP-specific T-cells from dendritic cells with stable tolerogenic function and to induce a regulatory effect on the specific antigen. Thus, such a combination therapy of tolerogenic dendritic cells and HSP peptide therapy could be the optimal solution for autoantigen(s) in autoimmune diseases such as RA [120,121].

Disease-specific ACPAs were found in a large population of RA patients and were strongly associated with HLA-DRB1 risk alleles [5]. Inspiringly, intradermal rheumavax, which is the first tolerogenic dendritic cell therapy in a clinical trial for the treatment of patients with RA with HLA risk genotype-positive and citrullinated peptide-specific autoimmunity, was usually well tolerated and considered safe [122].

Lack of vitamin D, especially vitamin D3, is regarded as a critical factor in autoimmune rheumatic disease, including initial disease development, and it is associated with poorer clinical outcomes [123,124]. The second trial of tolerogenic dendritic cells in RA was of dexamethasone and vitamin D3 for tolerogenic dendritic cell generation [125]. The generation of these cells with both dexamethasone and vitamin D3 had a synergistic effect on increasing IL-10 levels [126,127].

4. Clinical Trials and the Spotlight for RA in the Future

4.1. MicroRNA

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression by modulating the cell transcriptome directly [128,129]. miR-155 is a multifunctional miRNA with high production in immune cells and is essential for the immune response. Conversely, deregulation of miR-155 contributes to the progression of chronic inflammation in RA, and thus, miR-155 has potential as a therapeutic target for the treatment of RA [130]. Visfatin is a newly discovered adipocyte enzyme [131] that promotes the production of IL-6 and TNF-α via the inhibition of miR-199a-5p expression through the ERK, p38, and JNK pathways and is also a potential target for disease biomarker and drug development in inflammatory arthritis [132].

4.2. PI3Kγ Inhibitors

PI3Kγ mediates the modulation of chemokine-induced migration and enrollment of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages in patients with RA [133]. PI3Kγ is considered a potential target in the treatment of RA, though no drug has been developed yet to date [134]. In addition, pathogenic autoantibodies contribute significantly to antibody-initiated inflammation in RA progression. Targeting IgG by glyco-engineering bacterial enzymes to specifically cleave IgG and alter N-linked Fc-glycans or blocking the downstream effector pathways offers a novel opportunity to develop therapeutics for RA treatment in the future [135]. Novel drugs targeting IL-12/IL-23 axis have been proven effective in the treatment of severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (i.e., ustekinumab targeting the IL-12/23 p40 subunit that inhibits IL-12 and IL-23 activity and guselkumab targeting IL-23) [136]. The randomized phase II studies of ustekinumab and guselkumab in RA have shown convincing results, but infection is a primary concern [101].

The therapeutic design of TGFβ-transduced mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with enhanced immunomodulatory activity in experimental autoimmune arthritis reduces disease severity and modulates T-cell-mediated immune response. Thus, the use of gene-modified MSCs may be an avenue for new therapeutic development for RA treatment [137]. Several types of stem cells, such as hematopoietic stem cells, MSCs, and Tregs, are currently in clinical trials [138].

Attractively, novel anti-RA therapeutics had been developed currently such as antagonizing targets to histamine H4, histone deacetylase, LHRH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone), cadherin, MMP-9, CX3C ligand 1, and TLR4.

4.3. Histamine H4

Histamine H4 receptor (H4R) preserves immune-modulatory and chemotaxic potentials in various immune cells, andclozapine—a HR4 antagonist could protect mice from arthritis [139]. In addition, Yamaura et al. demonstrated that tJNJ77777120 (JNJ)—histamine4receptor (H4R) H4R antagonist exhibits significant anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activities in a mouse model of collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA). Suggesting the apparent involvement of H4R antagonism in the pathogenesis and progression of RA and implying that H4R in synovial tissue play a role in cartilage and bone destruction by influencing the secretion of MMP-3 in RA patients [140].

4.4. Histone Deacetylase (HDAC)

Since histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors repress the production of IL-6 in RA-FLS and macrophages by promoting mRNA decay [141]. Thus, the therapeutic potential of HDAC inhibitors had been investigated in RA and many HDAC inhibitors have been developed, e.g., the pan HDAC inhibitors, such as ITF 2357 and SAHA, inhibit all HDACs, and the selective HDAC inhibitors, such as Tubastatin A and Tubacin, inhibit HDAC6 specifically [142].

WhileHDAC3 powerfully regulates STAT1 activity in RA-FLS, indicating HDAC3 as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of RA and type I IFN-driven autoimmune diseases [143].

Moreover, the therapeutic effect of a novel specific HDAC6 inhibitor, CKD-L, compared to the pan HDAC inhibitors, ITF 2357 or Tubastatin A on CIA and Treg cells isolated from RA patients. In the CIA model, CKD-L and Tubastatin A significantly ameliorated the arthritis severity. CKD-L increasedCTLA-4 expression in Foxp3+ T-cells and inhibited the T-cells proliferation in the suppression assay. InRA PBMC, CKD-L significantly increased IL-10, and inhibited TNF-α and IL-1β. These results suggest that CKD-L—a novel HDAC6 inhibitor may have a therapeutic effect of RA in the future [143].

4.5. Cadherins

Cadherin-11 expressed mainly in the synovial lining and FLS adhered to cadherin-11-Fc are first proved, supporting an important role for cadherin-11 in the specific adhesion of FLS and in synovial tissue organization and behavior in health and RA [144]. Furthermore, Lee et al. demonstrate cadherin-11-deficient mice with a hypoplastic synovial lining that display a disorganized synovial reaction to inflammation and resistant to inflammatory arthritis. Accordingly, synovial cadherin-11 determines the manner of synovial cells in their proinflammatory and destructive tissue effects in inflammatory arthritis [145].

In the joint, cadherin-11 is critical for synovial development. In synovial fibroblasts, cell surface cadherin-11 engagement with a recombinant soluble form of the cadherin-11 extracellular binding domain linked to immunoglobulin Fc tail induced MAPK and NF-κB activation, leading to significant IL-6, chemokines, and MMP expression [146]. Currently, a monoclonal antibody againstcadherin-11 is in early phases of clinical trials in patients with RA [147], and the result is expectable.

4.6. LHRH (Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone)

RA symptoms may develop or burst during stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, such as during the menopausal transition, postpartum, anti-estrogen treatment, or polycystic ovarian syndrome while GnRH and gonadotropin secretion increases [148].

GnRH-antagonism—cetrorelix produced rapid anti-inflammatory effects in terms of decreased TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, and CRP compared with placebo in RA patients with high gonadotropin levels [149]. Therefore, current developed GnRH-antagonism—cetrorelix has the positive effects in RA that addresses the potential therapeutic candidate in RA patients with high level GnRH.

4.7. MMP-9

High expression of transcription factor SOX5 was detected in RA-FLS and MMP-9 expression was inhibited from the knockdown model of SOX5 in CIA mice, suggesting thatSOX5 at least a part plays a pivotal role in mediating migration and invasion of FLS by regulating MMP-9 expression in RA that was confirmed inhibited in the joint tissue and reduced pannus migration and invasion into the cartilage [150].

Exposure of monocytes/macrophages to tocilizumab, etanercept or abatacept is resulted in a significant decrease of the PMA-induced superoxide anion production. The expression of PPARγ was significantly increased only by tocilizumab, while etanercept was the only one able to significantly reduce MMP-9 gene expression and inhibit the LPS-induced MMP-9 activity in monocytes. An uneven production of proinflammatory cytokines and MMP-9 in diseased articular joint tissues probably is affected by IL-17 through interacting with the macrophages in the rheumatoid synovium [151]. Thus, to block MMP-9 may be a potential strategy for developing novel therapeutics in RA.

4.8. CX3C Ligand 1

CX3CL1 is the member of t CX3C chemokines also named Fractalkine. CX3CL1 plays a role in monocyte chemotaxis and angiogenesis in the rheumatoid synoviumin RA. Increased MMP-2 production is detected from synovial fibroblasts upon CX3CL1 stimulation in vitro, suggesting a proinflammatory role of this Th1-type chemokine in RA [152]. Synergistic up-regulation of CX3CL1 protein also was observed after treatment with IL-1β and IFN-γ. The production of lung fibroblast-derived CX3CL1 were obviously reduced by specific inhibitors of the STAT-1 transcription factor, supporting the hypothesis that lung fibroblasts are an important cellular source of CX3CL1 and may contribute to causing pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis [153]. Recently, a clinical trial of an anti-CX3CL1 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of RA had been inaugurated in Japan. The multiple roles of CX3CL1 are in the pathogenesis of RA, to block CXCL1 may have a potential as a therapeutic target for this disease [154].

4.9. Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs)-TLR4

ACPA precede the onset of clinical and subclinical RA., ACPA fine profiling has the potential to identify RA patients with a predominantly TLR4-driven pathotype. Thus, TLR4 ligands may drive pathogenic processes of ACPA based on their target specificity in RA and thus address the potential therapeutic benefit when neutralizing TLR4 in the disease of RA [155]. Neutralization of TLR4 signaling was designed by using NI-0101, which is a TLR4 antagonism in terms of therapeutic and specific antibody to target TLR4. NI-0101-aTLR4 inhibition in an ex vivo model of RA pathogenesis can significantly amend cytokines release including IL1, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α.

Pharmacological inhibition of TLR4 and NF-κB activation blocked the HMGB1-dependent up-regulation of HIF-1α mRNA expression and its activity and HMGB1 stimulated expression of EGF, and inhibition of HIF-1α attenuated HMGB1-induced VEGF [156].

DFMG attenuates the activation of macrophages induced by co-culture with LPC-injured HUVE-12 cells via the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway [157]. Predictably, the therapeutic design of TLR4 inhibition may be assumed as a therapeutic candidate for development in the treatment of RA soon or later.

4.10. Inflammasomes

Both hydroxychloroquine and VX740 are the potential candidates for the treatment of RA in the near future through modulation of inflammasomes [158]. Hydroxychloroquine (complex formationof the inflammasome) represses overexpression of TLR leading to inhibit the secretion of TNF-α. VX740—the inhibitor of caspase-1 inhibits CARD overexpression in RA and Decrease NLRP-3 and downstream proinflammatorycytokines. These novel approaches light on another therapeutic strategy in RA.

5. Conclusions

5.1. Challenge: Lessons from Targeted Interventions

Serious opportunistic infections rarely occur in long-term rituximab therapy. Nonetheless, patients and physicians must be aware that such opportunistic infections can occur. One example is the reactivation of the John Cunningham virus leading to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, which has been reported in patients with autoimmune diseases. Patients must be informed of the risk of such adverse events with rituximab therapy [159,160]. Additionally, long-term rituximab therapy is related to hypogammaglobulinemia. Thus, basal immunoglobulin levels should be determined and carefully monitored to judge how rituximab therapy should be managed in light of IgG levels [161]. Additionally, late-onset neutropenia is a potential rituximab-related adverse event; thus, neutrophil levels should be carefully monitored [81,162].

A few biologic drugs such as TNF-α, IL6R, and CD20 inhibitors, can cause complications of neutropenia. Combination therapy of abatacept and G-CSF reduced such neutropenia [163].

The safety profile of oral tofacitinib seems acceptable, although some severe adverse effects have been observed, including serious and opportunistic infections (including tuberculosis and herpes zoster), malignancies, and cardiovascular events, which require strict monitoring irrespective of the duration of tofacitinib administration. As an oral drug, tofacitinib offers an alternative to subcutaneous or intravenous administration and should be recognized as a more convenient way of drug administration [163].

In RA, current immune-modulated therapies fail to maintain long-term physiological regulation in drug-free remission. Nonetheless, autologous conditioned tolerogenic dendritic cells with HSP-derived peptide antigen(s) could be used to restore immune tolerance. These treatments could either promote tolerance in pathologic T-cells or stimulate disease-suppressing Tregs in a dissimilarmanner [120].

5.2. Potential Targets for RA in the Future

Since a better understanding of the pathophysiology of RA, new therapeutic approaches are emerging (Table 1). Many novel approaches appear to have good therapeutic potential in the challenges of developing new treatments for RA [104]. We have summarized these potential targets in Table 2 including targets of microRNA (miR-155 and Visfatin) [164], PI3Kγ for chemokine-induced migration, histamine 4 receptor (H4R) through blocking H4R in synovial tissue to prevent the destruction cartilage and bone, histone deacetylase (HDAC), cadherin-11, LHRH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone), CX3CL1, TLR4, and activation of inflammasomes. (summarized in Table 2)

Table 1.

Summary of novel treatment for RA.

Drug/Delivery Target Mechanism Immune-Modulation
Target CD80/CD86 receptor on T cells
Abatacept (Orencia®)
/Intravenous delivery
Fc-fusion protein of the extracellular domain of human CTLA-4 block the binding reaction between CD80/CD86 and CD28, a costimulatory signal required for complete activation of T cells and inhibition of TNFα, and IFNγ production by activated T cells. TNFα inducing the expression of innate cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8, resulting in the rapid recruitment of neutrophils upon exposure to infection is blocked by and inhibition of TNFα, and IFNγ production by preveting T cells activation
Antagonist of IL-1
Anakinra (Kineret®) /
Subcutaneous injection
Block the reaction of IL-1 binding to IL-1RI Block the reaction of IL-1 binding to IL-1RI resulting in intracellular signal
transduction
Lessen the IL-1 effect on increasing the synovial fibroblast cytokine, chemokine, iNOS, PGs and MMPs release.
IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody
Sarilumab (Kevzara®)/Subcutaneous injection a human IgG1 antibody, specifically
binds to soluble and membrane-bound IL-6R (sIL-6Ra and mIL-6Ra)
Inhibit IL-6-mediated signalling involving ubiquitous signal transducing
gp130 and STAT3
Interference the activator RANKL dependent or RANKL independent mechanismand also block the synergismwith IL-1β and TNF-α
in producing VEGF
IL-12/IL-23 antibodies
Ustekinumab (STELARA®)/
Subcutaneous injection
targeting the IL-12/23 p40 subunit, inhibiting both IL-12 and IL-23 activities Bind to the IL-12 and IL-23, cytokines and down modulate lymphocyte function, including Th 1 and Th17 cell subsets Inhibit IL-12-mediated signaling to reduce intracellular phosphorylation of STAT4 and STAT6 proteins, and impair the responses including cell surface molecule expression, NK cell activities and cytokine production, i.e., IFNγ
Guselkumab (Tremfya®)/
Subcutaneous injection
Specific targeting IL-23 Bind to IL-23 and repress induction of Th17 cell subsets
IL-23, mainly produced by dendritic cells, macrophages
Block IL-23 target cells via either an IL-17-dependent or an IL-17-independent mechanism and decrease IL-23 secretion and inpair activation of producing Th17 cells via IL-23R and reduce cytokine such as IL-17 or IL-22
JAK inhibitor
Tofacitinib (Xeljanz®)/
ORAL
the first-in-class JAK inhibitor, block JAK1 and JAK3 factor. Interference the binding of IL-6 to the IL-6Rα/gp130 complex, STAT proteins Tofacitinib block the pathway of JAK/STAT activation; due to JAK/STAT activation by IL-7 versus IL-6 or GM-CSF and the recruited to the cytokine/receptor complex
Baricitinib (Olumiant®)
Decernotinib
ORAL
Selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor Block with intracellular signal transduction , facilate the turnover of active, phosphorylated STAT1 and STAT3 inhibition of cytokine (IL-6)
or thrombopoietin and reduce the expression of pathogenic Th1 and Th17 and prevent chemotaxis towards IL-8
Filgotinib/ORAL selective
JAK1 inhibitor
Block with intracellular signal transduction , facilate the turnover of active, phosphorylated STAT1 decrease IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα and MMP1 and MMP3, inhibit immune cell trafficking (CXCL10, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) and VEGF. Also significantly decrease Th1 and Th17 cell subset differentiation and activity
Rheumavax®/Intradermal injection first-in-human trial for the treatment of RA generated tDC
by NF-κB inhibition
InhibitNF-κB and prevent DC maturation to reduce the expression of CD40
and HLA-DR ( a
class II MHC molecule)
confers tolerogenic properties to
DC including induction of T-cell anergy
elevation of B220+ CD11c−
B cells with a subpopulation
of B-regulatory cells (Bregs)
Pulsing tlDCs with HSP peptides /Intravenous delivery with with HSP loaded tDCs HSP 40 (dnaJB1): dnaJP1
HSP 60 (HspD1): DiaPep277
HSP 70 (HspA9): mB29a
Induce disease-suppressive
regulatory T cells
induce IL-10 production and TGF-β

Table 2.

Summary of potential targets for RA.

Drug or Compound Target Potential Mechanism Immune-Modulation
Developing inhibitor of miR-155 miR-155 regulatory functions on the expression of genes by modulating the cell transcriptome directly Inhibit TLR/cytokine receptor pathways and suppress the production of TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, and chemokines CCR7
Developing inhibitor of visfatin Visfatin Upregulation of miR-199a-5p expression through modulation of the ERK, p38, and JNK pathways Decrease the production of IL-6 and TNF-α
Developing inhibitor of PI3Kγ PI3Kγ modulation of chemokine-induced migration Control enrollment of inflammatory cells (i.e., neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages)
andclozapine
tJNJ77777120 (JNJ)
Histamine 4 receptor (H4R) Block H4R in synovial tissue to prevent the destruction cartilage and bone Immune-modulatory effect and repression of chemotaxic potentials by influencing the secretion of MMP-3
the pan HDAC inhibitors: ITF 2357 and SAHA
HDAC6 inhibitors: Tubastatin A, Tubacin, and CKD-L
histone deacetylase (HDAC) repress the production of IL-6 in RA FLS and macrophages by promoting mRNA decay CKD-L increased CTLA-4 expression in Foxp3+ T cells and inhibited the T cells proliferation in the suppression assay. CKD-L significantly increased IL-10, and inhibited TNF-α and IL-1β
a monoclonal antibody against cadherin-11 cadherin-11 Block the reaction of engagement with a recombinant soluble form of the cadherin-11 extracellular binding domain linked to immunoglobulin Fc tail induced MAPK and NF-κB activation in SFL Suppression the production of IL-6, chemokines, and MMP expression in SFL
GnRH-antagonism—cetrorelix LHRH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) rapid anti-inflammatory effects decreased TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, and CRP
knock-down model of SOX5 Block the MMP-9 Inhibit high expression of transcription factor SOX5 in RA-FLS repressed IL-17 through interacting with the macrophages
anti-CX3CL1 monoclonal antibody CX3CL1 Block monocyte chemotaxis and angiogenesis Decreased MMP-2
NI-0101, a TLR4 antagonism TLR4 block the HMGB1-dependent upregulation of HIF-1α mRNA expression amend cytokines release including IL1, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α.
Hydroxychloroquine (complex formation
of the inflammasome)
TLR overexpression Inflammasome priming mechanism Potential decreased TNF-α
VX 740 Caspace-1 Inhibit CARD8 overexpression Decrease NLRP-3 and dwonstream cytokines

There is worth in studyingthe mechanisms of pathogenesis of RA and understanding causes of therapeutic failure in RA—for example, IL-1, IL-12, IL-17, IL-20, IL-21, IL-23, anti-CD4, anti-BAFF, and inhibitors of p38-MAPK and SYK [5]. The ultimate goal is todevelop cause-oriented, curative therapies; however, this willnot be easily achievable without better understanding of theexact cause(s) of RA.Nevertheless, through the development of early and precious diagnostic approaches and novel therapeuticsthat will provide more précised and efficient treatment of RA in the near future.

Abbreviations

ACPA anticitrullinated protein antibody
TNFi tumor necrosis factor inhibitor
APC antigen-presenting cell
CRT calreticulin
CIA collagen-induced arthritis
DMARDs disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
csDMARD conventional synthetic DMARD
tsDMARD targeted synthetic DMARD
JAK Janus kinase
MMP matrix metalloproteinase
M1 type 1 macrophage
M2 type 2 macrophage
miRNA microRNA
MSC mesenchymal stem cell
NLRP3 nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3
RA rheumatoid arthritis
RANKL receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand;
ROS reactive oxygen species
TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α
Th T helper
TGF-β tumor growth factor-β
Treg regulatory T-cell
VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST102-2314-B-016 -019 -MY3 and MOST106-2314-B-016 -041 -MY3 to S.-J. Chen) and by a research grant from Tri-Service GeneralHospital, Taiwan(TSGH-C101-009-S03 and TSGH-C107-008-S03 to S.-J. Chen), as well as, by the Penghu Branch of Tri-Service GeneralHospital, Taiwan, (TSGH-C104-PH-1 and TSGH-PH-105-1 to S.-J. Chen, TSGH-PH-106-1 to J.-N. Chang and TSGH-PH-107-7 to Wan-Fu Hsu). In addition, a part of research grants from Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taiwan (CH-NDMC-107-05 to S.-J. Chen) and partly funded byNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Silman A.J., Pearson J.E. Epidemiology andgenetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:S265–S272. doi: 10.1186/ar578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aletaha D., Smolen J.S. Diagnosis and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review. JAMA. 2018;320:1360–1372. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smolen J.S., van der Heijde D., Machold K.P., Aletaha D., Landewe R. Proposal fora new nomenclature of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014;73:3–5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smolen J.S., Landewe R., Bijlsma J., Burmester G., Chatzidionysiou K., Dougados M., Nam J., Ramiro S., Voshaar M., van Vollenhoven R., et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:960–977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smolen J.S., Aletaha D., McInnes I.B. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388:2023–2038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Holmdahl R., Malmstrom V., Burkhardt H. Autoimmune priming, tissue attack and chronic inflammation—The three stages of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:1593–1599. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harre U., Schett G. Cellular and molecular pathways of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017;39:355–363. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0634-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mateen S., Zafar A., Moin S., Khan A.Q., Zubair S. Understanding the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2016;455:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cohen E., Nisonoff A., Hermes P., Norcross B.M., Lockie L.M. Agglutination of sensitized alligator erythrocytes by rheumatoid factor(s) Nature. 1961;190:552–553. doi: 10.1038/190552b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scherer H.U., Huizinga T.W.J., Kronke G., Schett G., Toes R.E.M. The B cell response to citrullinated antigens in the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018;14:157–169. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vande Walle L., Van Opdenbosch N., Jacques P., Fossoul A., Verheugen E., Vogel P., Beyaert R., Elewaut D., Kanneganti T.D., van Loo G., et al. Negative regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by A20 protects against arthritis. Nature. 2014;512:69–73. doi: 10.1038/nature13322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cuda C.M., Pope R.M., Perlman H. The inflammatory role of phagocyte apoptotic pathways in rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:543–558. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang S.P., Lehman C.W., Lien C.Z., Lin C.C., Bazzazi H., Aghaei M., Memarian A., Asgarian-Omran H., Behnampour N., Yazdani Y. Th1-Th17 Ratio as a New Insight in Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;17:68–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kessenbrock K., Krumbholz M., Schonermarck U., Back W., Gross W.L., Werb Z., Grone H.J., Brinkmann V., Jenne D.E. Netting neutrophils in autoimmune small-vessel vasculitis. Nat. Med. 2009;15:623–625. doi: 10.1038/nm.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Orkin S.H., Zon L.I. Hematopoiesis: An evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell. 2008;132:631–644. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Y., Han C.C., Cui D., Li Y., Ma Y., Wei W. Is macrophage polarization important in rheumatoid arthritis? Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017;50:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jaguin M., Houlbert N., Fardel O., Lecureur V. Polarization profiles of human M-CSF-generated macrophages and comparison of M1-markers in classically activated macrophages from GM-CSF and M-CSF origin. Cell. Immunol. 2013;281:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sidiropoulos P.I., Goulielmos G., Voloudakis G.K., Petraki E., Boumpas D.T. Inflammasomes and rheumatic diseases: Evolving concepts. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2008;67:1382–1389. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.078014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Groslambert M., Py B.F. Spotlight on the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. J. Inflamm. Res. 2018;11:359–374. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S141220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yi Y.S. Regulatory Roles of the Caspase-11 Non-Canonical Inflammasome in Inflammatory Diseases. Immune Netw. 2018;18:e41. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yi Y.S. Role of inflammasomes in inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2018;22:1–15. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2018.22.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guo C., Fu R., Wang S., Huang Y., Li X., Zhou M., Zhao J., Yang N. NLRP3 inflammasome activation contributes to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018;194:231–243. doi: 10.1111/cei.13167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lacey C.A., Mitchell W.J., Dadelahi A.S., Skyberg J.A. Caspases-1 and caspase-11 mediate pyroptosis, inflammation, and control of Brucella joint infection. Infect. Immun. 2018;86:e00361-18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00361-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shen H.H., Yang Y.X., Meng X., Luo X.Y., Li X.M., Shuai Z.W., Ye D.Q., Pan H.F. NLRP3: A promising therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2018;17:694–702. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lebre M.C., Tak P.P. Dendritic cell subsets: Their roles in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Reumatol. Port. 2008;33:35–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao Y., Zhang A., Du H., Guo S., Ning B., Yang S. Tolerogenic dendritic cells and rheumatoid arthritis: Current status and perspectives. Rheumatol. Int. 2012;32:837–844. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schinnerling K., Soto L., Garcia-Gonzalez P., Catalan D., Aguillon J.C. Skewing dendritic cell differentiation towards a tolerogenic state for recovery of tolerance in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015;14:517–527. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khan S., Greenberg J.D., Bhardwaj N. Dendritic cells as targets for therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2009;5:566–571. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sallusto F., Schaerli P., Loetscher P., Schaniel C., Lenig D., Mackay C.R., Qin S., Lanzavecchia A. Rapid and coordinated switch in chemokine receptor expression during dendritic cell maturation. Eur. J. Immunol. 1998;28:2760–2769. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199809)28:09<2760::AID-IMMU2760>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Van der Kleij D., Latz E., Brouwers J.F., Kruize Y.C., Schmitz M., Kurt-Jones E.A., Espevik T., de Jong E.C., Kapsenberg M.L., Golenbock D.T., et al. A novel host-parasite lipid cross-talk. Schistosomal lyso-phosphatidylserine activates toll-like receptor 2 and affects immune polarization. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:48122–48129. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206941200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Steinbrink K., Jonuleit H., Muller G., Schuler G., Knop J., Enk A.H. Interleukin-10-treated human dendritic cells induce a melanoma-antigen-specific anergy in CD8(+) T cells resulting in a failure to lyse tumor cells. Blood. 1999;93:1634–1642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lan Y.Y., Wang Z., Raimondi G., Wu W., Colvin B.L., de Creus A., Thomson A.W. “Alternatively activated” dendritic cells preferentially secrete IL-10, expand Foxp3+CD4+ T cells, and induce long-term organ allograft survival in combination with CTLA4-Ig. J. Immunol. 2006;177:5868–5877. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Obregon C., Kumar R., Pascual M.A., Vassalli G., Golshayan D. Update on Dendritic Cell-Induced Immunological and Clinical Tolerance. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1514. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jung S.M., Lee J., Baek S.Y., Lee J., Jang S.G., Hong S.M., Park J.S., Cho M.L., Park S.H., Kwok S.K. Fraxinellone Attenuates Rheumatoid Inflammation in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:829. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Myers L.K., Stuart J.M., Kang A.H. A CD4 cell is capable of transferring suppression of collagen-induced arthritis. J. Immunol. 1989;143:3976–3980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chiocchia G., Boissier M.C., Ronziere M.C., Herbage D., Fournier C. T cell regulation of collagen-induced arthritis in mice. I. Isolation of Type II collagen-reactive T cell hybridomas with specific cytotoxic function. J. Immunol. 1990;145:519–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sakaguchi S., Benham H., Cope A.P., Thomas R. T-cell receptor signaling and the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis: Insights from mouse and man. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2012;90:277–287. doi: 10.1038/icb.2012.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miossec P., van den Berg W. Th1/Th2 cytokine balance in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:2105–2115. doi: 10.1002/art.1780401203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mauri C., Feldmann M., Williams R.O. Down-regulation of Th1-mediated pathology in experimental arthritis by stimulation of the Th2 arm of the immune response. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:839–845. doi: 10.1002/art.10832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Van Hamburg J.P., Tas S.W. Molecular mechanisms underpinning T helper 17 cell heterogeneity and functions in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Autoimmun. 2018;87:69–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Volin M.V., Shahrara S. Role of TH-17 cells in rheumatic and other autoimmune diseases. Rheumatology. 2011;1 doi: 10.4172/2161-1149.1000104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ivanov I.I., McKenzie B.S., Zhou L., Tadokoro C.E., Lepelley A., Lafaille J.J., Cua D.J., Littman D.R. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 2006;126:1121–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pollinger B. IL-17 producing T cells in mouse models of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. J. Mol. Med. 2012;90:613–624. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0841-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kelchtermans H., Geboes L., Mitera T., Huskens D., Leclercq G., Matthys P. Activated CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells inhibit osteoclastogenesis and collagen-induced arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009;68:744–750. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.086066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dulic S., Vasarhelyi Z., Sava F., Berta L., Szalay B., Toldi G., Kovacs L., Balog A. T-Cell Subsets in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Long-Term Anti-TNF or IL-6 Receptor Blocker Therapy. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017;2017:6894374. doi: 10.1155/2017/6894374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kerkman P.F., Rombouts Y., van der Voort E.I., Trouw L.A., Huizinga T.W., Toes R.E., Scherer H.U. Circulating plasmablasts/plasmacells as a source of anticitrullinated protein antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013;72:1259–1263. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pelzek A.J., Gronwall C., Rosenthal P., Greenberg J.D., McGeachy M., Moreland L., Rigby W.F.C., Silverman G.J. Persistence of Disease-Associated Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody-Expressing Memory B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Remission. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1176–1186. doi: 10.1002/art.40053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Malemud C.J. The role of the JAK/STAT signal pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2018;10:117–127. doi: 10.1177/1759720X18776224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Navegantes K.C., de Souza Gomes R., Pereira P.A.T., Czaikoski P.G., Azevedo C.H.M., Monteiro M.C. Immune modulation of some autoimmune diseases: The critical role of macrophages and neutrophils in the innate and adaptive immunity. J. Transl. Med. 2017;15:36. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1141-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Milanova V., Ivanovska N., Dimitrova P. TLR2 elicits IL-17-mediated RANKL expression, IL-17, and OPG production in neutrophils from arthritic mice. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014;2014:643406. doi: 10.1155/2014/643406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wright H.L., Chikura B., Bucknall R.C., Moots R.J., Edwards S.W. Changes in expression of membrane TNF, NF-{kappa}B activation and neutrophil apoptosis during active and resolved inflammation. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011;70:537–543. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pelletier M., Maggi L., Micheletti A., Lazzeri E., Tamassia N., Costantini C., Cosmi L., Lunardi C., Annunziato F., Romagnani S., et al. Evidence for a cross-talk between human neutrophils and Th17 cells. Blood. 2010;115:335–343. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-216085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cua D.J., Tato C.M. Innate IL-17-producing cells: The sentinels of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:479–489. doi: 10.1038/nri2800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jaeger B.N., Donadieu J., Cognet C., Bernat C., Ordonez-Rueda D., Barlogis V., Mahlaoui N., Fenis A., Narni-Mancinelli E., Beaupain B., et al. Neutrophil depletion impairs natural killer cell maturation, function, and homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:565–580. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mantovani A., Sozzani S., Locati M., Allavena P., Sica A. Macrophage polarization: Tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:549–555. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02302-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kennedy A., Fearon U., Veale D.J., Godson C. Macrophages in synovial inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2011;2:52. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Morand E.F., Leech M. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Biosci. A J. Virtual Libr. 2005;10:12–22. doi: 10.2741/1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang K.C., Tsai C.P., Lee C.L., Chen S.Y., Chin L.T., Chen S.J. Elevated plasma high-mobility group box 1 protein is a potential marker for neuromyelitis optica. Neuroscience. 2012;226:510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang L.H., Wu M.H., Chen P.C., Su C.M., Xu G., Huang C.C., Tsai C.H., Huang Y.L., Tang C.H. Prognostic significance of high-mobility group box protein 1 genetic polymorphisms in rheumatoid arthritis disease outcome. Int. J. Med Sci. 2017;14:1382–1388. doi: 10.7150/ijms.21773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang N., Liang H., Zen K. Molecular mechanisms that influence the macrophage m1-m2 polarization balance. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:614. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Roberts C.A., Dickinson A.K., Taams L.S. The Interplay Between Monocytes/Macrophages and CD4(+) T Cell Subsets in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:571. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Michalak M., Corbett E.F., Mesaeli N., Nakamura K., Opas M. Calreticulin: One protein, one gene, many functions. Biochem. J. 1999;344:281–292. doi: 10.1042/bj3440281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Duo C.C., Gong F.Y., He X.Y., Li Y.M., Wang J., Zhang J.P., Gao X.M. Soluble calreticulin induces tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin (IL)-6 production by macrophages through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and NFkappaB signaling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:2916–2928. doi: 10.3390/ijms15022916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Burger D., Dayer J.M. The role of human T-lymphocyte-monocyte contact in inflammation and tissue destruction. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:S169–S176. doi: 10.1186/ar558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zrioual S., Toh M.L., Tournadre A., Zhou Y., Cazalis M.A., Pachot A., Miossec V., Miossec P. IL-17RA and IL-17RC receptors are essential for IL-17A-induced ELR+ CXC chemokine expression in synoviocytes and are overexpressed in rheumatoid blood. J. Immunol. 2008;180:655–663. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.1.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Evans H.G., Gullick N.J., Kelly S., Pitzalis C., Lord G.M., Kirkham B.W., Taams L.S. In vivo activated monocytes from the site of inflammation in humans specifically promote Th17 responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:6232–6237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808144106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Alonso M.N., Wong M.T., Zhang A.L., Winer D., Suhoski M.M., Tolentino L.L., Gaitan J., Davidson M.G., Kung T.H., Galel D.M., et al. T(H)1, T(H)2, and T(H)17 cells instruct monocytes to differentiate into specialized dendritic cell subsets. Blood. 2011;118:3311–3320. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-341065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Brennan F.M., Foey A.D., Feldmann M. The importance of T cell interactions with macrophages in rheumatoid cytokine production. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2006;305:177–194. doi: 10.1007/3-540-29714-6_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hansen W., Westendorf A.M., Buer J. Regulatory T cells as targets for immunotherapy of autoimmunity and inflammation. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets. 2008;7:217–223. doi: 10.2174/187152808786848360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kishimoto T., Kang S., Tanaka T. IL-6: A New Era for the Treatment of Autoimmune Inflammatory Diseases. Rheumatol. Int. 2015:131–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Venuturupalli S. Immune Mechanisms and Novel Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunol. Allergy Clin. North Am. 2017;37:301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rose-John S. IL-6 trans-signaling via the soluble IL-6 receptor: Importance for the pro-inflammatory activities of IL-6. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012;8:1237–1247. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dayer J.M., Choy E. Therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis: The interleukin-6 receptor. Rheumatology. 2010;49:15–24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yoshida Y., Tanaka T. Interleukin 6 and rheumatoid arthritis. Biomed Res. Int. 2014;2014:698313. doi: 10.1155/2014/698313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Romano M., Sironi M., Toniatti C., Polentarutti N., Fruscella P., Ghezzi P., Faggioni R., Luini W., van Hinsbergh V., Sozzani S., et al. Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment. Immunity. 1997;6:315–325. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80334-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Suzuki M., Hashizume M., Yoshida H., Mihara M. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of tocilizumab, a humanized anti-IL-6R antibody: Effect on the expression of chemokine and adhesion molecule. Rheumatol. Int. 2010;30:309–315. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-0953-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hashizume M., Mihara M. The roles of interleukin-6 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis. 2011;2011:765624. doi: 10.1155/2011/765624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Choy E.H., Panayi G.S., Kingsley G.H. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Br. J. Rheumatol. 1995;34:707–715. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.8.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Serio I., Tovoli F. Rheumatoid arthritis: New monoclonal antibodies. Drugs Today. 2018;54:219–230. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.3.2788019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Edwards J.C., Szczepanski L., Szechinski J., Filipowicz-Sosnowska A., Emery P., Close D.R., Stevens R.M., Shaw T. Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. New Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:2572–2581. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Schioppo T., Ingegnoli F. Current perspective on rituximab in rheumatic diseases. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2017;11:2891–2904. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S139248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Emery P., Fleischmann R., Filipowicz-Sosnowska A., Schechtman J., Szczepanski L., Kavanaugh A., Racewicz A.J., van Vollenhoven R.F., Li N.F., Agarwal S., et al. The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: Results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1390–1400. doi: 10.1002/art.21778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mehsen N., Yvon C.M., Richez C., Schaeverbeke T. Serum sickness following a first rituximab infusion with no recurrence after the second one. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2008;26:967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mease P.J., Cohen S., Gaylis N.B., Chubick A., Kaell A.T., Greenwald M., Agarwal S., Yin M., Kelman A. Efficacy and safety of retreatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with previous inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: Results from the SUNRISE trial. J. Rheumatol. 2010;37:917–927. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Emery P., Gottenberg J.E., Rubbert-Roth A., Sarzi-Puttini P., Choquette D., Taboada V.M., Barile-Fabris L., Moots R.J., Ostor A., Andrianakos A., et al. Rituximab versus an alternative TNF inhibitor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who failed to respond to a single previous TNF inhibitor: SWITCH-RA, a global, observational, comparative effectiveness study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015;74:979–984. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Steeland S., Libert C., Vandenbroucke R.E. A New Venue of TNF Targeting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1442. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Billmeier U., Dieterich W., Neurath M.F., Atreya R. Molecular mechanism of action of anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9300–9313. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nesbitt A., Fossati G., Bergin M., Stephens P., Stephens S., Foulkes R., Brown D., Robinson M., Bourne T. Mechanism of action of certolizumab pegol (CDP870): In vitro comparison with other anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1323–1332. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Nguyen D.X., Ehrenstein M.R. Anti-TNF drives regulatory T cell expansion by paradoxically promoting membrane TNF-TNF-RII binding in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:1241–1253. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Levy L., Fautrel B., Barnetche T., Schaeverbeke T. Incidence and risk of fatal myocardial infarction and stroke events in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A systematic review of the literature. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2008;26:673–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pala O., Diaz A., Blomberg B.B., Frasca D. B Lymphocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Effects of Anti-TNF-alpha Agents on B Lymphocytes: A Review of the Literature. Clin. Ther. 2018;40:1034–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kroesen S., Widmer A.F., Tyndall A., Hasler P. Serious bacterial infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Rheumatology. 2003;42:617–621. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kotyla P.J. Bimodal Function of Anti-TNF Treatment: Shall We Be Concerned about Anti-TNF Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Heart Failure? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1739. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Monaco C., Nanchahal J., Taylor P., Feldmann M. Anti-TNF therapy: Past, present and future. Int. Immunol. 2015;27:55–62. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxu102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Volpe E., Servant N., Zollinger R., Bogiatzi S.I., Hupe P., Barillot E., Soumelis V. A critical function for transforming growth factor-beta, interleukin 23 and proinflammatory cytokines in driving and modulating human T(H)-17 responses. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:650–657. doi: 10.1038/ni.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kirkham B.W., Kavanaugh A., Reich K. Interleukin-17A: A unique pathway in immune-mediated diseases: Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Immunology. 2014;141:133–142. doi: 10.1111/imm.12142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Leipe J., Schramm M.A., Prots I., Schulze-Koops H., Skapenko A. Increased Th17 cell frequency and poor clinical outcome in rheumatoid arthritis are associated with a genetic variant in the IL4R gene, rs1805010. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1165–1175. doi: 10.1002/art.38343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Leonardi C.L., Kimball A.B., Papp K.A., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Wang Y., Li S., Dooley L.T., Gordon K.B. PHOENIX 1 Study Investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1) Lancet. 2008;371:1665–1674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60725-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Papp K.A., Langley R.G., Lebwohl M., Krueger G.G., Szapary P., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Hsu M.C., Wang Y., Li S., et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2) Lancet. 2008;371:1675–1684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60726-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Gordon K.B., Duffin K.C., Bissonnette R., Prinz J.C., Wasfi Y., Li S., Shen Y.K., Szapary P., Randazzo B., Reich K. A Phase 2 Trial of Guselkumab versus Adalimumab for Plaque Psoriasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:136–144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Smolen J.S., Agarwal S.K., Ilivanova E., Xu X.L., Miao Y., Zhuang Y., Nnane I., Radziszewski W., Greenspan A., Beutler A., et al. A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:831–839. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Traynor K. FDA approves tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2012;69:2120. doi: 10.2146/news120088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Gertel S., Mahagna H., Karmon G., Watad A., Amital H. Tofacitinib attenuates arthritis manifestations and reduces the pathogenic CD4 T cells in adjuvant arthritis rats. Clin. Immunol. 2017;184:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cheung T.T., McInnes I.B. Future therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis? Semin. Immunopathol. 2017;39:487–500. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0623-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chastek B., Becker L.K., Chen C.I., Mahajan P., Curtis J.R. Outcomes of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor cycling versus switching to a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug with a new mechanism of action among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Med Econ. 2017;20:464–473. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1275653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Samson M., Audia S., Janikashvili N., Ciudad M., Trad M., Fraszczak J., Ornetti P., Maillefert J.F., Miossec P., Bonnotte B. Brief report: Inhibition of interleukin-6 function corrects Th17/Treg cell imbalance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2499–2503. doi: 10.1002/art.34477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Pesce B., Soto L., Sabugo F., Wurmann P., Cuchacovich M., Lopez M.N., Sotelo P.H., Molina M.C., Aguillon J.C., Catalan D. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor blockade on the balance between regulatory T cells and T helper type 17 cells in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2013;171:237–242. doi: 10.1111/cei.12017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sarantopoulos A., Tselios K., Gkougkourelas I., Pantoura M., Georgiadou A.M., Boura P. Tocilizumab treatment leads to a rapid and sustained increase in Treg cell levels in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Comment on the article by Thiolat et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2638. doi: 10.1002/art.38714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Tono T., Aihara S., Hoshiyama T., Arinuma Y., Nagai T., Hirohata S. Effects of anti-IL-6 receptor antibody on human monocytes. Mod. Rheumatol. 2015;25:79–84. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.914016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Huizinga T.W., Fleischmann R.M., Jasson M., Radin A.R., van Adelsberg J., Fiore S., Huang X., Yancopoulos G.D., Stahl N., Genovese M.C. Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6Ralpha in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: Efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-RA-MOBILITY Part A trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014;73:1626–1634. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Genovese M.C., Fleischmann R., Kivitz A.J., Rell-Bakalarska M., Martincova R., Fiore S., Rohane P., van Hoogstraten H., Garg A., Fan C., et al. Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1424–1437. doi: 10.1002/art.39093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Gabay C., Msihid J., Zilberstein M., Paccard C., Lin Y., Graham N.M.H., Boyapati A. Identification of sarilumab pharmacodynamic and predictive markers in patients with inadequate response to TNF inhibition: A biomarker substudy of the phase 3 TARGET study. RMD Open. 2018;4:e000607. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kubo S., Nakayamada S., Sakata K., Kitanaga Y., Ma X., Lee S., Ishii A., Yamagata K., Nakano K., Tanaka Y. Janus Kinase Inhibitor Baricitinib Modulates Human Innate and Adaptive Immune System. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1510. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Al-Salama Z.T., Scott L.J. Baricitinib: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drugs. 2018;78:761–772. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0908-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kaine J.L. Abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A review, Current therapeutic research. Clin. Exp. 2007;68:379–399. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Langdon K., Haleagrahara N. Regulatory T-cell dynamics with abatacept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2018;37:206–214. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2018.1465943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.De Matteis R., Larghi P., Paroni M., Murgo A., De Lucia O., Pagani M., Pierannunzii L., Truzzi M., Ioan-Facsinay A., Abrignani S., et al. Abatacept therapy reduces CD28+CXCR5+ follicular helper-like T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;35:562–570. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Trzonkowski P., Bacchetta R., Battaglia M., Berglund D., Bohnenkamp H.R., ten Brinke A., Bushell A., Cools N., Geissler E.K., Gregori S., et al. Hurdles in therapy with regulatory T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:304ps18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa7721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Jansen M.A.A., Spiering R., Broere F., van Laar J.M., Isaacs J.D., van Eden W., Hilkens C.M.U. Targeting of tolerogenic dendritic cells towards heat-shock proteins: A novel therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases? Immunology. 2018;153:51–59. doi: 10.1111/imm.12811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Boog C.J., de Graeff-Meeder E.R., Lucassen M.A., van der Zee R., Voorhorst-Ogink M.M., van Kooten P.J., Geuze H.J., van Eden W. Two monoclonal antibodies generated against human hsp60 show reactivity with synovial membranes of patients with juvenile chronic arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 1992;175:1805–1810. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.6.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Schett G., Redlich K., Xu Q., Bizan P., Groger M., Tohidast-Akrad M., Kiener H., Smolen J., Steiner G. Enhanced expression of heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) and heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) activation in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue. Differential regulation of hsp70 expression and hsf1 activation in synovial fibroblasts by proinflammatory cytokines, shear stress, and antiinflammatory drugs. J. Clin. Investig. 1998;102:302–311. doi: 10.1172/JCI2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Benham H., Nel H.J., Law S.C., Mehdi A.M., Street S., Ramnoruth N., Pahau H., Lee B.T., Ng J., Brunck M.E., et al. Citrullinated peptide dendritic cell immunotherapy in HLA risk genotype-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:290ra87. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Gatenby P., Lucas R., Swaminathan A. Vitamin D deficiency and risk for rheumatic diseases: An update. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2013;25:184–191. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835cfc16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ishikawa L.L.W., Colavite P.M., Fraga-Silva T.F.C., Mimura L.A.N., Franca T.G.D., Zorzella-Pezavento S.F.G., Chiuso-Minicucci F., Marcolino L.D., Penitenti M., Ikoma M.R.V., et al. Vitamin D Deficiency and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2017;52:373–388. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8577-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Coutinho A.E., Chapman K.E. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2011;335:2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Naranjo-Gomez M., Raich-Regue D., Onate C., Grau-Lopez L., Ramo-Tello C., Pujol-Borrell R., Martinez-Caceres E., Borras F.E. Comparative study of clinical grade human tolerogenic dendritic cells. J. Transl. Med. 2011;9:89. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Phillips B.E., Garciafigueroa Y., Trucco M., Giannoukakis N. Clinical Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells: Exploring Therapeutic Impact on Human Autoimmune Disease. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1279. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Soltanzadeh-Yamchi M., Shahbazi M., Aslani S., Mohammadnia-Afrouzi M. MicroRNA signature of regulatory T cells in health and autoimmunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;100:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Furer V., Greenberg J.D., Attur M., Abramson S.B., Pillinger M.H. The role of microRNA in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. Clin. Immunol. 2010;136:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Alivernini S., Gremese E., McSharry C., Tolusso B., Ferraccioli G., McInnes I.B., Kurowska-Stolarska M. MicroRNA-155-at the Critical Interface of Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1932. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Fukuhara A., Matsuda M., Nishizawa M., Segawa K., Tanaka M., Kishimoto K., Matsuki Y., Murakami M., Ichisaka T., Murakami H., et al. Visfatin: A protein secreted by visceral fat that mimics the effects of insulin. Science. 2005;307:426–430. doi: 10.1126/science.1097243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wu M.H., Tsai C.H., Huang Y.L., Fong Y.C., Tang C.H. Visfatin Promotes IL-6 and TNF-α Production in Human Synovial Fibroblasts by Repressing miR-199a-5p through ERK, p38 and JNK Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:190. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hayer S., Pundt N., Peters M.A., Wunrau C., Kuhnel I., Neugebauer K., Strietholt S., Zwerina J., Korb A., Penninger J., et al. PI3Kgamma regulates cartilage damage in chronic inflammatory arthritis. FASEB J. 2009;23:4288–4298. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-135160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rommel C., Camps M., Ji H. PI3K delta and PI3K gamma: Partners in crime in inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis and beyond? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:191–201. doi: 10.1038/nri2036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Nandakumar K.S. Targeting IgG in Arthritis: Disease Pathways and Therapeutic Avenues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:677. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Boutet M.A., Nerviani A., Gallo Afflitto G., Pitzalis C. Role of the IL-23/IL-17 Axis in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: The Clinical Importance of Its Divergence in Skin and Joints. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:530. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Park M.J., Park H.S., Cho M.L., Oh H.J., Cho Y.G., Min S.Y., Chung B.H., Lee J.W., Kim H.Y., Cho S.G. Transforming growth factor beta-transduced mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune arthritis through reciprocal regulation of Treg/Th17 cells and osteoclastogenesis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1668–1680. doi: 10.1002/art.30326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Liu R., Zhao P., Tan W., Zhang M. Cell therapies for refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2018;36:911–919. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Nent E., Frommholz D., Gajda M., Brauer R., Illges H. Histamine 4 receptor plays an important role in auto-antibody-induced arthritis. Int. Immunol. 2013;25:437–443. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxt008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Yamaura K., Oda M., Suzuki M., Ueno K. Lower expression of histamine H(4) receptor in synovial tissues from patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to those with osteoarthritis. Rheumatol. Int. 2012;32:3309–3313. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Grabiec A.M., Korchynskyi O., Tak P.P., Reedquist K.A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocyte and macrophage IL-6 production by accelerating mRNA decay. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012;71:424–431. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.154211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Delcuve G.P., Khan D.H., Davie J.R. Roles of histone deacetylases in epigenetic regulation: Emerging paradigms from studies with inhibitors. Clin. Epigenetics. 2012;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Angiolilli C., Kabala P.A., Grabiec A.M., Van Baarsen I.M., Ferguson B.S., Garcia S., Malvar Fernandez B., McKinsey T.A., Tak P.P., Fossati G., et al. Histone deacetylase 3 regulates the inflammatory gene expression programme of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:277–285. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Valencia X., Higgins J.M., Kiener H.P., Lee D.M., Podrebarac T.A., Dascher C.C., Watts G.F., Mizoguchi E., Simmons B., Patel D.D., et al. Cadherin-11 provides specific cellular adhesion between fibroblast-like synoviocytes. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200:1673–1679. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Lee D.M., Kiener H.P., Agarwal S.K., Noss E.H., Watts G.F., Chisaka O., Takeichi M., Brenner M.B. Cadherin-11 in synovial lining formation and pathology in arthritis. Science. 2007;315:1006–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1137306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Noss E.H., Watts G.F., Zocco D., Keller T.L., Whitman M., Blobel C.P., Lee D.M., Brenner M.B. Evidence for cadherin-11 cleavage in the synovium and partial characterization of its mechanism. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015;17:126. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0647-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Sfikakis P.P., Vlachogiannis N.I., Christopoulos P.F. Cadherin-11 as a therapeutic target in chronic, inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Clin. Immunol. 2017;176:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Tan A.L., Emery P. Role of oestrogen in the development of joint symptoms? Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:817–818. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70217-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Kass A., Hollan I., Fagerland M.W., Gulseth H.C., Torjesen P.A., Forre O.T. Rapid Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with High Gonadotropin Levels in the AGRA Trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Shi Y., Wu Q., Xuan W., Feng X., Wang F., Tsao B.P., Zhang M., Tan W. Transcription Factor SOX5 Promotes the Migration and Invasion of Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes in Part by Regulating MMP-9 Expression in Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:749. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Jovanovic D.V., Martel-Pelletier J., Di Battista J.A., Mineau F., Jolicoeur F.C., Benderdour M., Pelletier J.P. Stimulation of 92-kd gelatinase (matrix metalloproteinase 9) production by interleukin-17 in human monocyte/macrophages: A possible role in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1134–1144. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<1134::AID-ANR24>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Blaschke S., Koziolek M., Schwarz A., Benohr P., Middel P., Schwarz G., Hummel K.M., Muller G.A. Proinflammatory role of fractalkine (CX3CL1) in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2003;30:1918–1927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Isozaki T., Otsuka K., Sato M., Takahashi R., Wakabayashi K., Yajima N., Miwa Y., Kasama T. Synergistic induction of CX3CL1 by interleukin-1beta and interferon-gamma in human lung fibroblasts: Involvement of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 signaling pathways. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2011;157:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Nanki T., Imai T., Kawai S. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod. Rheumatol. 2017;27:392–397. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2016.1213481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hatterer E., Shang L., Simonet P., Herren S., Daubeuf B., Teixeira S., Reilly J., Elson G., Nelson R., Gabay C., et al. A specific anti-citrullinated protein antibody profile identifies a group of rheumatoid arthritis patients with a toll-like receptor 4-mediated disease. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016;18:224. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1128-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Park S.Y., Lee S.W., Kim H.Y., Lee W.S., Hong K.W., Kim C.D. HMGB1 induces angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis via HIF-1alpha activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015;45:1216–1227. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Cong L., Yang S., Zhang Y., Cao J., Fu X. DFMG attenuates the activation of macrophages induced by coculture with LPCinjured HUVE12 cells via the TLR4/MyD88/NFkappaB signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018;41:2619–2628. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Deuteraiou K., Kitas G., Garyfallos A., Dimitroulas T. Novel insights into the role of inflammasomes in autoimmune and metabolic rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol. Int. 2018;38:1345–1354. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Borie D., Kremer J.M. Considerations on the appropriateness of the John Cunningham virus antibody assay use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;45:163–166. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Ishikawa Y., Kasuya T., Ishikawa J., Fujiwara M., Kita Y. A case of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy while using rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2018;14:1149–1153. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S167109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Casulo C., Maragulia J., Zelenetz A.D. Incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients receiving rituximab and the use of intravenous immunoglobulin for recurrent infections. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013;13:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Breuer G.S., Ehrenfeld M., Rosner I., Balbir-Gurman A., Zisman D., Oren S., Paran D. Late-onset neutropenia following rituximab treatment for rheumatologic conditions. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014;33:1337–1340. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2562-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Priora M., Parisi S., Scarati M., Borrelli R., Peroni C.L., Fusaro E. Abatacept and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and neutropenia. Immunotherapy. 2017;9:1055–1059. doi: 10.2217/imt-2017-0065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Li X., Tian F., Wang F. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated microRNA-155 targets SOCS1 and upregulates TNF-alpha and IL-1beta in PBMCs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:23910–23921. doi: 10.3390/ijms141223910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES