The family Rubrobacteraceae is often represented by its thermophilic and radiotolerant species. Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus have been extensively studied, contributing to defining the characteristics of the family.
ABSTRACT
The family Rubrobacteraceae is often represented by its thermophilic and radiotolerant species. Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus have been extensively studied, contributing to defining the characteristics of the family. We have now sequenced the genome of a Rubrobacter taiwanensis strain, isolated from Yellowstone National Park, to further characterize the family.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The key feature of Rubrobacter species is their thermophilic behavior. This was first observed in isolates of R. xylanophilus and R. radiotolerans (1, 2) and has since been documented in two newer species, R. calidifluminis and R. naiadicus (3). They commonly exhibit halotolerance and have been found to live in hot springs around the world, but their most unique characteristic is their high tolerance to gamma radiation. This has been hypothesized to be a by-product of defense against desiccation, similar to that in the radiation-tolerant genus Deinococcus, which is found in high gamma radiation environments (2, 4). The documented species in this family are recorded as having modest genome sizes (around 2 to 3 Mbp) and commonly contain genes for reduction of nitrates to nitrite, as well as cytochrome oxidase and catalase (1, 4). A more recent study suggests the presence of proteins involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis, suggesting a photosynthetic pathway (5).
A pink isolate was obtained from the Mushroom Hot Spring runoff in Yellowstone National Park, with a sampling point temperature of 50°C (lat 44.5387, long –110.798). The sample was obtained from the microbial mat and its surrounding water. The isolate was purified by streaking on solid Thermus medium with 0.3% tryptone and 0.3% yeast extract (6). A partial 16S rRNA gene was sequenced (530 bp) by MIDI Labs (Newark, DE). A BLAST (NCBI) comparison showed 99% and 100% similarity with Rubrobacter taiwanensis LS286 and LS293, respectively, 96% similarity with Rubrobacter spartanus, 95% similarity with Rubrobacter xylanophilus, and 94% similarity with Rubrobacter radiotolerans. No genome sequence is currently available for either of the closely related R. taiwanensis strains, which were isolated previously from hot springs in Taiwan (7). We have sequenced the genome of this new isolate to further characterize the species identity.
We isolated DNA of our R. taiwanensis isolate from living culture grown on Thermus medium with 0.3% yeast extract and 0.15% fructose and ribose. Genomic DNA was isolated using the GeneJET DNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific) to perform a genome comparison and explore the similarities and differences from more extensively studied species. Utilizing Qubit and NanoDrop technologies, we determined the quality and quantity of DNA, showing a 260/280 ratio of 1.79. The genome was sequenced by an Illumina MiniSeq system using 500 μl of a 1.8 pM library. Paired-end (2 × 150-bp) sequencing generated 3,883,502 reads and 330 Mbp. Quality control of the reads was performed using FastQC within BaseSpace version 1.0.0 (Illumina) using a k-mer size of 5 and contamination filtering. We performed de novo assembly using Velvet version 1.2.10 (8) through BaseSpace using a minimum k-mer size of 21 and a maximum k-mer size of 121 and including reverse complement reads. This assembly yielded 53 contigs (≥1,000 bp), the largest being 350,459 bp, and an N50 value of 112,895 bp. The GC content was 67.2%. We then annotated the genome sequence using Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) version 2.0 (9), using the RASTk default annotation pipeline, including the automated error fix and gap backfill settings. This showed our strain to be 3,035,128 bp long with 3,170 coding sequences and 48 RNAs identified.
A JSpecies comparison (10) of average percentage nucleotide identities (ANI) between this R. taiwanensis genome and other published Rubrobacteraceae genomes gave the following percentages: 74.2% (R. xylanophilus DSM9941), 71.4% (R. aplysinae), 71.0% (R. radiotolerans RSPS-4), and 69.6% (R. indicoceanis). Thus, R. taiwanensis appears to be approximately equidistant to the other four Rubrobacter species that have been sequenced. They are all more distant from Kineococcus radiotolerans, with an ANI of 65.0%. The R. taiwanensis ANI numbers are clearly below the proposed 95% cutoff for the genome definition of a species (10), suggesting its own species identity.
Data availability.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number SKBU00000000. The version described in this paper is version SKBU01000000. The raw sequencing reads have been submitted to the SRA, and the corresponding accession number is SRR8670886.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was sponsored by the Wilson Enhancement Fund for Applied Research in Science at Bellevue University. The Yellowstone sample was collected under Yellowstone research permit number 1502 to R. F. Ramaley.
REFERENCES
- 1.Carreto L, Moore E, Nobre MF, Wait R, Riley PW, Sharp RJ, da Costa MS. 1996. Rubrobacter xylanophilus sp. nov., a new thermophilic species isolated from a thermally polluted effluent. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 46:460–465. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-2-460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ferreira AC, Nobre MF, Moore E, Rainey FA, Battista JR, da Costa MS. 1999. Characterization and radiation resistance of new isolates of Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus. Extremophiles 3:235–238. doi: 10.1007/s007920050121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Albuquerque L, Johnson MM, Schumann P, Rainey FA, da Costa MS. 2014. Description of two new thermophilic species of the genus Rubrobacter, Rubrobacter calidifluminis sp. nov. and Rubrobacter naiadicus sp. nov., and emended description of the genus Rubrobacter and the species Rubrobacter bracarensis. Syst Appl Microbiol 37:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Egas C, Barroso C, Froufe HJC, Pacheco J, Albuquerque L, da Costa MS. 2014. Complete genome sequence of the radiation-resistant bacterium Rubrobacter radiotolerans RSPS-4. Stand Genomic Sci 9:1062–1075. doi: 10.4056/sigs.5661021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gupta RS, Khadka B. 2016. Evidence for the presence of key chlorophyll-biosynthesis-related proteins in the genus Rubrobacter (phylum Actinobacteria) and its implications for the evolution and origin of photosynthesis. Photosynth Res 127:201–218. doi: 10.1007/s11120-015-0177-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramaley RF, Hixson J. 1970. Isolation of a nonpigmented, thermophilic bacterium similar to Thermus aquaticus. J Bacteriol 103:527–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen M-Y, Wu S-H, Lin G-H, Lu C-P, Lin Y-T, Chang W-C, Tsay S-S. 2004. Rubrobacter taiwanenesis sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, radiation-resistant species isolated from hot springs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1849–1855. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number SKBU00000000. The version described in this paper is version SKBU01000000. The raw sequencing reads have been submitted to the SRA, and the corresponding accession number is SRR8670886.