The author wishes to make the following corrections to the methods section of their paper [1]:
The corrections include: (1) Replace the sentence “Mouse striatum (including both dorsal and ventral (accumbens) striatum or olfactory tubercle) was homogenized and sonicated in 1 mL in a low-ionic strength Tris buffer containing 20 mM Tris, 10 mM DTT, 2 mM 0.5 M EDTA, 10% Triton X-100, 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Bimake, Houston, TX, USA)” with “Mouse striatum (including both dorsal and ventral (accumbens) striatum or olfactory tubercle) was homogenized and sonicated in 1 mL in a low-ionic strength Tris buffer containing 2 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Bimake, Houston, TX, USA)”; (2) replace the sentence “magnetic separation in an immunoprecipitation wash buffer (50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100)” with “magnetic separation in an immunoprecipitation wash buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100)”.
These corrections do not affect the conclusions of the study. We apologize for the typographical errors, and the authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The manuscript will be updated, and the original manuscript will remain online on the article webpage.
References
- 1.Watkins D.S., True J.D., Mosley A.L., Baucum A.J., II Proteomic Analysis of the Spinophilin Interactome in Rodent Striatum Following Psychostimulant Sensitization. Proteomes. 2018;6:53. doi: 10.3390/proteomes6040053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]