Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2019 Mar 22;8(3):73. doi: 10.3390/plants8030073

Sulphated Polysaccharide from Acanthophora spicifera Induced Hevea brasiliensis Defense Responses Against Phytophthora palmivora Infection

Sittiporn Pettongkhao 1, Abdulmuhaimin Bilanglod 1, Khemmikar Khompatara 2, Nunta Churngchow 1,*
PMCID: PMC6473620  PMID: 30909469

Abstract

Elicitors from seaweeds are considered an alternative stimulant of plant defenses against pathogenic infection. Finding new sources of elicitors and exploring their effects on plant defenses is a significant undertaking. In this study, we extracted crude polysaccharide (CPS) from Acanthophora spicifera (a red alga) and tested the effects of the compound on rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) defense responses. Accumulations of salicylic acid (SA) and scopoletin (Scp) were measured by HPLC. The expression of SA- and Jasmonic acid (JA)-responsive genes was analyzed by semi-qRT-PCR. Strong anion exchange chromatography and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used for purification and functional characterization of CPS, respectively. The extracted CPS enhanced rubber tree defenses against Phytophthora palmivora infection. It induced SA and Scp accumulations and SA-responsive gene expression, but suppressed JA-responsive gene expression. We successfully separated the non-sulphated polysaccharide (F1) from the sulphated polysaccharides (SPS). Both peaks of SPS (F2 and F3) were identified as lambda (λ)-carrageenan. The F3 fraction showed greater elicitor activity on tobacco leaves. It induced SA and Scp accumulations and peroxidase activity but suppressed catalase activity. Furthermore, the purified λ-carrageenan did not cause cell death in tobacco or rubber tree leaves. Therefore, the elicitor from A. spicifera could be an alternative plant stimulant.

Keywords: Acanthophora spicifera, λ-carrageenan, Hevea brasiliensis, induced resistance, Phytophthora palmivora, sulphated polysaccharide

1. Introduction

Hevea brasiliensis (Wild.) Muell.-Arg, or the Para rubber tree, is one of the most important economic crops in Thailand. Its products are exported worldwide, producing significant revenue. Phytophthora palmivora infects 1000 or more plant species, including ornamental, horticultural, and agricultural crops. It has been identified as a causal agent of leaf fall and black stripe that destroy the rubber plant [1]. These diseases reduce the quality and yield of rubber latex which presents important problems to cultivators.

Plants establish a state of enhanced defensive capacity in response to appropriate stimuli. This state is called induced resistance which is highly effective against a broad range of subsequent pathogen challenges [2]. Two forms of induced resistance are systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR). SAR involves accumulations of pathogenesis-related proteins and salicylic acid (SA) [3], whereas ISR depends on jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) pathways [4]. Many marker genes, such as pathogenesis-related genes 1 (PR-1), endo-1,3-β-D-glucanase (PR-2), and thaumatin-like protein (PR-5), are frequently used to illustrate an SA-mediated plant defense response. On the other hand, genes associated with the JA signaling pathway are chitinase (PR-3), hevein-like protein (PR-4), and protease inhibitor (PR-6) [5].

Elicitors are biofactors or chemicals from various sources that are able to induce physiological changes in targeted living organisms. Elicitors are obtained from many sources and induce morphological and physiological alterations and phytoalexin accumulation in plants. Biotic elicitors are derived from bacteria, fungi, plant cell components, viruses, or herbivores, as well as chemicals that are released by plants at the attack site after infection, whereas abiotic elicitors are metal ions and organic compounds [6]. Poly- or oligosaccharides, such as chitin, xyloglucans, chitosan, β-glucan, and oligogalacturonide exhibit elicitor activity in different plant species and strongly induce phytoalexins in plants [6]. Therefore, elicitors have been considered as alternative tools for disease control in crops.

Phytophthora pathogens also produce elicitors. Plants pretreated with these elicitors establish induced resistance. Elicitin (10 kDa) and a new 75 kDa elicitor from P. palmivora can induce peroxidase activity and accumulations of scopoletin (Scp) and phenolic compounds both in leaves and a suspension of rubber tree cells [7]. The OPEL from Phytophthora parasitica triggers callose deposition and expressions of SA-responsive genes including PR-1 and PR-5. Nicotiana benthamiana leaves pretreated with the OPEL before being challenged with P. parasitica show disease resistance against the infection [8]. Pretreatment of tobacco leaves with a 34 kDa glycoprotein elicitor (CBEL) from P. parasitica causes necrosis, induces defense gene expression, and disease resistance [9]. However, these elicitors require many steps to purify, and tend to induce cell death in plants, so they are not suitable to protect field crops.

Marine macroalgae are considered important alternative sources of polysaccharide elicitors because they do not cause cell death on plant tissues [10,11,12]. Sourced from marine macroalgae and green, brown, and red seaweed, cell wall and storage polysaccharides such as alginates, carrageenans, fucans, laminarin, and ulvans can trigger plant defense responses and enhance resistance to viral, fungal, and bacterial infections [13]. For example, sulphated carrageenan from the red alga, Hypnea musciformis, induces phytoalexin accumulation, expressions of genes involved in SA and JA signaling pathways, and results in resistance against tobacco mosaic virus infection [12]. Glucuronan and ulvans from the green alga, Ulva lactuca, induce SA and phenolic compound accumulations in tomato seedlings and also significantly induce resistance in tomatoes to Fusarium oxysporum infection [14]. A linear β-1,3-glucan extracted from the brown alga, Laminaria digitata, induces expressions of PR-1, PR-2, PR-3, and PR-5 genes [10]. In addition, ulvans and oligoulvans from U. lactuca increase catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities and induce phenolic compounds and lignin contents in apples, which lead to resistance against Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea infections [15].

Acanthophora spicifera is a red seaweed of the family Rhodomelaceae (order Ceramiales). The major polysaccharides of many red macroalgae are carrageenans. The structure of carrageenan from A. spicifera is reported to be a λ-type-carrageenan [16]. The λ-carrageenan consists of a repeating dimer of D-galactose (A unit), sulphated in C2, linked to a D-galactose (B unit) sulphated in C2 and C6. Duarte et al. [17] reported that the sulphated polysaccharide from A. spicifera consisted of A and B units of galactose molecules. In addition, some of the B unit was 3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactose which resulted in the loss of C6-sulphate. However, an alternative purification method and applications of A. spicifera extract in plant protection have rarely been reported.

SPS from diverse red algae induces different defense arsenals in several plant species. Mercier et al. [18] reported that the algal polysaccharide carrageenan, λ-carrageenan, causes SA production and fluorescent compound accumulation in tobacco leaves. Arabidopsis thaliana treated with ι- or κ-carrageenans reduces leaf damage caused by Trichoplusia ni; in addition, ι-carrageenan induces the expression of defense genes, including PR-1 and PDF1.2 [19]. Arabidopsis pretreated with λ-carrageenan elevates expression of the JA-related genes, AOS, PDF1.2, and PR-3, and resists Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection. In contrast, the ι-carrageenan increases susceptibility to this pathogen [20]. Carrageenan is not only a beneficial plant inducer that stimulates plant defense responses, but is also a compound that improves the growth of plants [21]. Thus, SPS from A. spicifera could be an alternative source of a plant defense inducer.

Since SPS from A. spicifera has not yet been reported as a plant bio-stimulant, we investigated the effects of polysaccharide extracted from A. spicifera on the rubber tree plant. In this study, we utilized the crude polysaccharide (CPS) of this seaweed as a bio-elicitor to enhance the disease resistance of H. brasiliensis against P. palmivora infection and measured inductions of SA and Scp, including expressions of HbPR-1, HbGLU, and HbASI. Furthermore, we purified λ-carrageenan from the CPS. The purified λ-carrageenan was also used to test for cell death and responsive enzyme (catalase and peroxidase) induction.

2. Results

2.1. CPS Induced Resistance in Rubber Tree Leaves.

CPS from A. spicifera was precipitated by ethanol for use as a plant elicitor. Leaves were treated with the CPS for 24 h and then infected with zoospores of P. palmivora. The infected leaves were classified in five levels of infection (Figure 1A). We found that the CPS reduced the numbers of P. palmivora-infected leaves (P-value < 0.001) (Figure 1B) and infected leaves showed less severe signs of the disease (Figure 1C) (P-value = 0.003). The disease severity of the CPS-treated leaves was lower by about 2-fold than controls which were treated with sterile distilled water. The result revealed that the CPS extracted from A. spicifera could act as a plant defense inducer against P. palmivora infection on rubber tree leaves.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crude polysaccharide (CPS) reduced infected leaves (%) and disease severity (%) in rubber tree leaves after infection by P. palmivora. Five grades of symptom (grade 0: No symptom; grade 1: Slight symptoms; grade 2: Medium distortion; grade 3: Rather serious distortion; grade 4: Extremely serious symptoms) were used to calculate the severity of infection (A). The percentage of infected leaves (B) and disease severity (%) (C) of rubber tree leaves after treatment with 0.5 mg/mL CPS and sterile distilled water (DW) for 24 h and subsequent inoculation with 1 × 105 zoospores/mL of P. palmivora. The infected leaves and disease severity were monitored at five days post inoculation. Data bars were the means (± SE) of three replicates. Each replicate consisted of 42 independent leaves from seven independent rubber trees. One and two asterisks (* and **) indicate statistically significant differences of CPS-treated leaves compared with DW-treated leaves (P-value < 0.01 and P-value < 0.001, respectively) using Student’s t-test.

2.2. SA and Scp in Rubber Tree Leaves were Induced by the CPS.

Rubber tree leaves, after being sprayed with the CPS, were analyzed for levels of SA and Scp by HPLC. We found that SA was significantly induced at 48 h post treatment (P-value = 0.037) and was slightly elevated again at 96 h post treatment (Figure 2A). Scp was highly increased at 48 h (P-value = 0.003) and reached the highest level at 96 h post treatment (P-value = 0.005) (Figure 2B). The results showed that CPS caused accumulations of SA and Scp in rubber tree leaves.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CPS enhanced salicylic acid (SA) and scopoletin (Scp) accumulations in rubber tree leaves. The relative SA (A) and Scp (B) contents in rubber tree leaves treated with 0.5 mg/mL CPS and sterile distilled water (DW). Data bars were the SA or Scp content (±SE) in CPS-treated leaves relative to DW-treated leaves at each time point. The results derived from three replicates, and each replicate consisted of four plants. One and two asterisks (* and **) indicate statistically significant differences of relative SA or Scp content at each time point compared with relative SA or Scp content at time 0 h (P-value < 0.05 and P-value < 0.01, respectively) using Student’s t-test.

2.3. CPS Induced Expression of HbPR-1 and HbGLU in Rubber Tree Leaves but Reduced the Expression of HbASI.

As the CPS induced rubber tree defenses via inductions of SA and Scp, we further studied the expression of the pathogenesis-related protein genes, HbPR-1, HbPR-2, or HbGLU and HbPR-6 or HbASI, of this plant. To investigate whether CPS induced defenses through the SA or JA signaling pathway, half of the rubber tree leaf was used for SA and Scp analyses and the other half was used for studying expression of these genes. Compared with gene expression in control leaves, the expression of HbPR-1 was induced about 3-fold at 24 h post-treatment (P-value = 0.03) (Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time course inductions of HbPR-1 (A), HbGLU (B), and HbASI (C) expressions by semi-qRT-PCR. The expressions were analyzed on rubber tree leaves treated with 0.5 mg/mL CPS and sterile distilled water (DW). The relative gene expression was calculated in comparison with HbMito gene expression. Data bars were the means (±SE) of three replicates, and each replicate consisted of four plants. One asterisk (*) indicates statistically significant differences of CPS-treated leaves compared with DW-treated leaves (P-value < 0.05) using Student’s t-test.

The HbGLU expression was significantly more induced at 24 (P-value = 0.03) and 72 (P-value = 0.02) hours post treatment by about 3-fold and 2.5-fold, respectively (Figure 3B). On the other hand, rubber tree leaves treated with the CPS showed reduced expression of HbASI. The HbASI expression was down-regulated at 24 h and significantly decreased at 48 h post-treatment (P-value = 0.04) (Figure 3C). These results revealed that the CPS induced HbPR-1 and HbGLU expressions but suppressed HbASI expression, and also suggested that CPS induced rubber tree defenses through the SA signaling pathway.

2.4. The CPS Consisted of Three Fractions and the Major Fraction was SPS, λ-Carrageenans.

A strong anion exchanger, Q sepharose (GE Healthcare), was used to purify the CPS isolated from A. spicifera. We could separate the CPS into three fractions, F1, F2, and F3, which were eluted with 0.4 M, 0.8 M, and 1.6 M NaCl, respectively (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Chromatographic elution profiles of F1, F2, and F3 eluted with 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 M NaCl, respectively, using a strong anion column, Q sepharose. A total of 2.5 mL of the eluted solution of each fraction were collected and subsequently determined for polysaccharide content.

The chromatographic elution profiles of the three fractions demonstrated a complete separation of the fractions (Figure 4). The percentages of F1, F2, and F3 were 24%, 15%, and 61%, respectively. The main fraction, F3, was eluted with 1.6 M NaCl (Figure 4).

FTIR analysis was carried out to classify each fraction as a non-sulphated or sulphated polysaccharide and to identify the types of carrageenan present. The spectra presented a band at 2927 cm−1 and a broad and strong absorption band at 3387 cm−1 (Figure 5). Šandula et al. [22] suggested that the bands near 2930 and 3405 cm−1 represented the stretching of the CH bond and OH group, respectively. The spectra also showed a broad and strong absorption band at 950 to 1200 cm−1 (Figure 5), which is assigned to CO vibration [22]. There was no absorption band of amide I (C=O) at 1546 cm−1 nor of amide II (NH) at 1649 cm−1 [23,24]. Since these bands are characteristic of proteins, the results indicated that all fractions were polysaccharides and did not contain any protein.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The FTIR spectra of F1 (A), F2 (B), and F3 (C) fractions eluted with 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 M NaCl, respectively, through a Q sepharose column.

Surprisingly, we found an absorption band near 1221 cm−1 in fractions F2 and F3 (Figure 5B,C), but not in fraction F1 (Figure 5A). The absorption band between 1210 and 1270 cm−1 represents the stretching vibration of the S=O bond in the sulphate group [25]. This result indicated that F1 was non-sulphated while F2 and F3 were sulphated polysaccharide (SPS). Carrageenan types were identified from the characteristic peaks of κ-, ι-, and λ-carrageenan. The spectra of κ- and ι- carrageenan present one important band at 845 cm−1 from galactose-4-sulphate [26]. Galactose-2-sulphate and galactose-6-sulphate in λ-carrageenan produce absorption bands near 830 and 820 cm−1, respectively [27]. We did not detect the absorption band at 845 cm−1, but we found absorption bands near 830 and 820 cm−1 in the spectra of F2 and F3 fractions (Figure 5B,C).

Even though the FTIR equipment automatically labeled the absorption bands at 833.24 cm−1, an absorption band near 820 cm−1 was also present in F2 (Figure 5B). For F3, the absorption band at 819.12 cm−1 was automatically labeled while an absorption band near 830 cm−1 was also observed (Figure 5C). These results suggested that F2 and F3 fractions were λ-carrageenan showing vice versa signals at 830 and 820 cm−1. Thus, the CPS extracted from A. spicifera consisted of both non-sulphated and sulphated polysaccharide (SPS) and the SPS was λ-carrageenan.

2.5. The F3 Fraction Exhibited the Highest Elicitor Activity in Tobacco Leaves and was a Broad Molecular-Weight λ-Carrageenan.

The elicitor activity of each fraction was tested by infiltration into tobacco leaves which was more practical than spraying onto rubber tree leaves. We found that the F1 fraction did not induce Scp accumulation. However, in tobacco leaves infiltrated with F2 or F3 fractions, the level of Scp was higher at 48 h post infiltration (Figure 6A). In addition, only the F3 fraction was still inducing Scp at 96 h (Figure 6A). The results suggest that the SPS, λ-carrageenan in this study, possessed elicitor activity but the non-sulphated form did not, and the F3 fraction exhibited the highest elicitor activity.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Scp contents in tobacco leaves treated with purified F1, F2, and F3 from CPS of A. spicifera and sterile distilled water (DW) (A). Data bars indicate the means (±SE) of three replicates. Each replicate consisted of four independent tobacco leaves. The gel permeation chromatography(GPC) elution curve of fraction F3 (B). Significant differences utilizing one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test (P-value = 0.05) were presented by differences among treatments.

We also performed a gel permeation chromatography (GPC) experiment to study the molecular weight distribution of F3, which exhibited the highest elicitor activity. The chromatogram revealed that this λ-carrageenan was a broad molecular-weight polysaccharide (Figure 6B).

2.6. λ-carrageenan Strongly Induced SA and Scp Accumulations in Rubber Tree Leaves.

Fraction F3 (λ-carrageenan) was further evaluated for SA and Scp accumulations in rubber tree leaves as earlier investigated with CPS in Figure 2. We found that the SA level started to increase at 48 h (P-value = 0.039) and significant accumulation was present at 72 (P-value = 0.001) and 96 (P-value = 0.001) hours post treatment (Figure 7A). Scp accumulation also started to increase at 48 (P-value < 0.001) and 72 (P-value < 0.001) hours and was well sustained at 96 h (P-value < 0.001) post treatment (Figure 7B). These results suggest that λ-carrageenan not only triggered Scp synthesis in the tobacco plant, but also induced SA and Scp accumulation in rubber tree leaves, and that λ-carrageenan was the bioactive compound responsible for elicitor activity in the CPS.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The λ-carrageenan enhanced SA and Scp accumulations in rubber tree leaves. The relative SA (A) and Scp (B) contents in rubber tree leaves treated with 0.5 mg/mL λ-carrageenan and sterile distilled water (DW). Data bars were the SA or Scp content (±SE) in λ-carrageenan-treated leaves relative to DW-treated leaves at each time point. The results derived from three replicates, and each replicate consisted of four plants. One and two asterisks (* and **) indicate statistically significant differences of relative SA or Scp content at each time point compared with relative SA or Scp content at time 0 h (P-value < 0.05 and P-value < 0.01, respectively) using Student’s t-test.

2.7. λ-Carrageenan Suppressed Catalase Activity, but Highly Activated Peroxidase Activity.

Rubber tree leaves treated with F3, λ-carrageenan, were cut in and half of each leaf was used for SA and Scp analyses while the other half was used for studying the activities of the defense-related enzymes, catalase, and peroxidase. After native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and staining, the results revealed that catalase activity in the λ-carrageenan-treated leaves was suppressed for 96 h post treatment whereas catalase activity in control leaves was increased. The suppression of catalase activity was observed at 48, 72, and 96 h post treatment (Figure 8A). In contrast, peroxidase activity was strongly induced at 24 h and was still increasing at 48 and 72 h post treatment (Figure 8B). These results suggested that catalase activity was suppressed by λ-carrageenan while peroxidase activity was increased.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Activity staining of catalase (A) and peroxidase (B) activity. The rubber tree leaves were treated with 0.5 mg/mL λ-carrageenan and sterile distilled water (DW). Each treatment comprised 12 leaves from different rubber trees. In the toxicity test (C), 10 tobacco leaves were infiltrated with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/mL λ-carrageenan and sterile distilled water (DW). The symptom induction on tobacco leaves was monitored on day five, post infiltration.

2.8. λ-carrageenan did not Cause Cell Death either in Tobacco or Rubber Tree Leaves.

λ-carrageenan was sprayed on rubber tree leaves to determine its toxicity. It did not induce cell death in rubber tree leaves (data not shown). We also tested the toxicity of λ-carrageenan on tobacco leaves. λ-carrageenan was infiltrated into tobacco leaves at concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL. Cell death did not occur at any of the λ-carrageenan concentrations tested (Figure 8C). The result indicated that λ-carrageenan was safe to use as a plant bio-stimulant.

3. Discussion

Many marine-derived polysaccharides, such as alginates, carrageenans, fucans, laminarin, and ulvans, trigger plant defense responses which enhance protection against viral, fungal, and bacterial infections [13]. The results of this study revealed that CPS extracted from A. spicifera induced rubber tree resistance to P. palmivora by reducing the number of infected leaves and severity of the disease (Figure 1B,C). Sulphated fucan oligosaccharides extracted from the marine brown alga, Pelvetia canaliculata, and subsequently degraded with a fucan-degrading hydrolase, are able to stimulate both local and systemic resistance in tobacco leaves against the tobacco mosaic virus [11]. The polysaccharide extracted from a red alga, H. musciformis, induces biological activity in tobacco leaves against the tobacco mosaic virus [12]. Ulvans extracted from a mixture of several Ulva species (mostly Ulva armoricana) induce protection against the fungi Colletotrichum trifolii in Medicago truncatula [28]. The diameter of the necrotic lesion caused by Erwinia carotovora on a tobacco plant previously injected with laminarin from the brown seaweed, Laminaria digitata, is reduced [10]. Our results demonstrated that CPS from A. spicifera potentially contained an elicitor that induced rubber tree resistance against P. palmivora infection.

Interestingly, our results showed that the CPS extracted from A. spicifera induced SA accumulation in rubber tree leaves (Figure 2A). Many seaweed extracts induce SA. The sulphated fucan oligosaccharides extracted from P. canaliculata induce accumulation of SA that make tobacco plants more resistant to the tobacco mosaic virus [11]. Sulphated laminarin (PS3) induces SA accumulation in tobacco leaves [29]. CPS, in the present study, also increased Scp in rubber tree leaves (Figure 2B). Several plants produce Scp, a coumarin phytoalexin, which is an antimicrobial substance induced by pathogen infection or elicited by abiotic agents. Klarzynski et al. [11] demonstrated that Scp triggered by sulphated fucan oligosaccharides supported resistance in tobacco plants. Tobacco leaves infiltrated with sulphated polysaccharide from H. musciformis induce blue fluorescence metabolites which are phytoalexins (Scp and sesquiterpenoid) and derivatives from the phenylpropanoid pathways [12]. In addition, the PS3 induces Scp accumulation in tobacco leaves against the tobacco mosaic virus infection [29].

Expression of the SA-responsive genes, HbPR-1 and HbGLU was induced in the CPS-treated rubber tree leaves; on the other hand, a JA-responsive gene, HbASI was significantly suppressed (Figure 3). It has been reported that activation of the SA signaling pathway suppresses the JA signaling pathway [30]. The correlation between gene expression and accumulation of SA suggested that the CPS in this study induced rubber defense responses through the SA signaling pathway. In contrast, the sulphated polysaccharide (SPS) from H. musciformis enhances expression of genes involving SA and subsequently activated the JA/ET signaling pathway [12]. P. palmivora infection is inhibited in N. benthamina that expresses the PR-1 protein; furthermore, the PR-1 protein acts as an antifungal protein by inhibiting zoospore germination [31]. The cell wall of the oomycete mainly consists of β-1,3-glucan [32] which is a substrate of β-1,3-glucanase. Consequently, induction of HbPR-1 and HbGLU by our elicitor could enhance rubber leaf resistance against P. palmivora infection.

The CPS from A. spicifera was purified using a Q sepharose, and was separated into three fractions (F1, F2, and F3) (Figure 4). We were able to remove a non-sulphated polysaccharide fraction (F1) from sulphated polysaccharide. Both fractions (F2 and F3) displayed absorption bands near 830 and 820 cm−1, but the F2 fraction displayed a strong absorption band of galactose-2-sulphate at 833.24 cm−1 (Figure 5B), whereas the F3 fraction showed an absorption band of galactose-6-sulphate at 819.12 cm−1 (Figure 5C). Duarte et al. [17] reported that the sulphated polysaccharide from A. spicifera consisted of A and B units of galactose molecules; in addition, some of the B unit was 3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactose. Consequently, the galactose-6-sulphate would not be present, resulting in a lower anion charge. Basically, the weakest ionic interaction molecule is eluted from the column first; molecules with stronger ionic interactions are eluted with a higher salt concentration. The fraction (F3) that displayed the absorption band at 819.12 cm−1 possibly had more galactose-6-sulphate than the F2 fraction. Therefore, F3 had a stronger negative charge than the F2 fraction.

After infiltration into tobacco leaves, the non-sulphated polysaccharide, F1, did not trigger Scp synthesis whereas the sulphated polysaccharide (F2 and F3) or λ-carrageenan did (Figure 6A). The better inducer was the fraction eluted with 1.6 M NaCl (F3) because it possessed more negative charge. Similarly, the highly sulphated λ-carrageenan enhances resistance to S. sclerotiorum, resulting in smaller leaf lesions on Arabidopsis. In contrast, the ι-carrageenan, which is a lower sulphated carrageenan, induces susceptibility to this pathogen [20]. It has been shown that after chemical sulphation, laminarin became a stronger inducer. Clearly, sulphated laminarin, but not laminarin, causes electrolyte leakage and Scp and SA accumulations. In addition, laminarin triggers expressions of ET-dependent PR proteins whereas sulphated laminarin induces expressions of ET- and SA-dependent PR proteins [29]. Of the two algal polysaccharides, larminarin and carrageenan, only carrageenan efficiently triggers the defense gene expression in tobacco leaves [18]. Mercier et al. [18] suggested that λ-carrageenan containing the highest sulphate content was the most active inducer. Furthermore, when the molecular weight distribution of the F3 fraction was analyzed, we found that it was a broad molecular-weight carrageenan (Figure 6B). This finding supported the report of Necas and Bartosikova [33].

Since the F3 fraction showed the greatest effect and was the major component in the CPS, we further used the F3 fraction in purified form, which was a λ-carrageenan, to confirm the effects on rubber tree defense responses. Our results revealed that λ-carrageenan in the F3 fraction induced SA and Scp accumulations (Figure 7). Both the CPS and the purified F3 induced SA and Scp, so the active compound in the CPS that triggered rubber tree defense responses against P. palmivora infection was λ-carrageenan. λ-carrageenan has been reported to have different effects on plants. Arabidopsis leaves treated with λ-carrageenan show resistance to S. sclerotiorum that is correlated with increasing expression of the JA-responsive genes, PDF1.2 and PR-3 [20]. Sangha et al. [19] treated A. thaliana leaves with ι- or κ-carrageenan and obtained reductions of leaf damage caused by Trichoplusia ni. In contrast, λ- carrageenan-treated leaves show the same leaf damage as the controls. Our result was similar to the result of Mercier et al. [18], who reported that λ-carrageenan (1000 µg/mL) induced the accumulation of SA in tobacco leaves.

The perception of elicitors induces phenomena such as ion flux, medium alkalinization and cytoplasmic acidification, oxidative burst, and reactive oxygen species production [6]. In our study, we focused on the plant defensive enzymes, catalase and peroxidase. These enzymes are major H2O2 scavengers in plants [34]. Surprisingly, our results revealed that catalase activity was highly suppressed at 48, 72, and 96 h after treatment with λ-carrageenan (Figure 8A). At these time points, the levels of SA were elevated (Figure 7A). SA is able to bind SA-binding protein (SABP) [35]. SABP shows catalase activity which is specifically inhibited by SA [36], therefore, at these time points, increasing SA might bind and inhibit catalase activity (Figure 8A). In contrast, the activity of the other H2O2 scavenger, peroxidase, was increased (Figure 8B). Hiraga et al. [37] showed that peroxidase played important roles in various physiological processes such as lignification and defense response against pathogen infection. So, induction of peroxidase might promote rubber tree defense responses against P. palmivora infection.

The toxicity of λ-carrageenan was tested by infiltrating this elicitor into tobacco leaves. No cell death was detected (Figure 8C), therefore, this sulphated polysaccharide from A. spicifera was a friendly stimulant. Similarly, another sulphated polysaccharide, extracted from the red alga H. musciformis, do not cause cell death in tobacco leaves [12]. Klarzynski et al. [11] also supported that sulphated oligofucans did not display signs of toxicity on tobacco leaves. Furthermore, carrageenan is not only a beneficial plant inducer to enhance plant defense responses, but has also been shown to promote plant growth [21]. Consequently, the λ-carrageenan from A. spicifera could be an alternative elicitor used for enhancing plant defense response.

We successfully used the CPS from A. spicifera to induce rubber tree resistance against P. palmivora infection via activation of the SA signaling pathway. It has been reported that SA enhances rubber tree defense responses against P. palmivora by increasing endogenous SA and Scp contents, lignin formation, peroxidase activity, and expression of PR-1 [38]. In order to avoid the expense of commercial SA, the CPS from A. spicifera could be used as an alternative plant defense stimulant.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Pathogen and Plants

P. palmivora isolated from Hevea brasiliensis was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25 °C for 1 week. A 5-mm diameter cork-borer was used to cut agar containing P. palmivora. The agar plugs were maintained on a V8 agar for 1 week. For zoospore preparation, sterile distilled water was added to a V8 agar plate and further incubated at 4 °C for 15 min. Zoospores of P. palmivora were counted with Petroff Hauser under a light microscope. The zoospore concentration at 1x105 zoospores/mL was used in this study.

Rubber tree seedlings (RRIM600 cultivar) at the B2C developmental stage and 8-week tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants were maintained in a growth room with photoperiod control (12 h of light and 12 h of dark at 25 °C). A. spicifera was kindly provided by the Phetchaburi Coastal Fisheries Research and Development Center, Phetchaburi, Thailand. Salt and sand were removed by washing with tap water. The biomass was air dried at 60 °C to a constant weight, then milled into fine powder.

4.2. Crude Polysaccharide (CPS) Extraction

The fine alga powder (5 g) was treated with methanol (85%, 100 mL) and stirred with a mechanical stirrer overnight to remove pigments, lipids, and low molecular-weight carbohydrates. The material was then boiled at 70 °C in 500 mL of distilled water for 4 h with mechanical stirring. The CPS in the mixture was separated from the residue by centrifugation (6500× g) for 10 min. The supernatant was poured into three volumes of ethanol (95%) allowing precipitation. The CPS pellet was collected using centrifugation (6500× g) for 10 min, dissolved in distilled water, dialyzed, and lyophilized to a constant weight. Before treatment, the CPS was dissolved in sterile distilled water to a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL.

4.3. Induction of Local Resistance in Rubber Tree Leaves

The rubber tree leaves were treated with CPS solution at 0.5 mg/mL and sterile distilled water (DW) for 24 h using spraying. After that, the CPS- and DW-treated rubber tree leaves were infected with 1 × 105 zoospores/mL of P. palmivora using the same method. At five days after treatment, P. palmivora infection was measured by counting the disease severity on infected leaves. The disease severity index (DSI) was determined according to the modified method described by Yang et al. [39]. Five grades of infection symptom were used (grade 0: No symptom; grade 1: Slight symptoms; grade 2: Medium distortion; grade 3: Rather serious distortion; grade 4: Extremely serious symptoms) (Figure 1A) and the DSI was calculated using the following formula.

Disease severity index (DSI)=(disease grade×no. of leaves in each grade×100)(total no. of leaves×highest disease grade)

Three replicates were performed. Each replicate consisted of 42 independent leaves from 7 independent rubber trees.

4.4. Salicylic Acid (SA) and Scopoletin (Scp) Measurements

The DW- and CPS-treated leaves were collected and extracted by the modified method according to Ederli et al. [40] at designated time points. The treated leaves (0.25 g) were crushed into fine powder in liquid nitrogen in a mortar and then 750 µL of 90% MeOH was added and mixed. The fine mashed solutions were transferred into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatants were collected. Pellets were re-extracted with 500 µl of 90% MeOH and mixed with the collected supernatants. Total supernatants were adjusted with 50% w/v trichloroacetic acid to reach the final concentration of 5% w/v of trichloroacetic acid, passed through a 0.2 µm filter, and stored in a 2 mL HPLC vial at −20 °C. The samples were analyzed using an HPLC apparatus of the Agilent 1100 series equipped with a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 micron column. The mobile phase consisted of 2 solutions, 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile. A gradient elution method was used as follows (time in min/percentage acetonitrile): 0–2/20, 2–8.50/20–40, 8.51–10/40, and 10.01–13/40–60. Fluorescence detectors, Ex 294 nm, Em 426 nm, Ex 337 nm, and Em 425 nm were used to analyze the levels of SA and Scp, respectively.

4.5. Expression of Defense-Related Genes

4.5.1. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

The DW- and CPS-treated rubber tree leaves were collected at designated time points and stored in liquid nitrogen. The frozen leaves were ground into fine powder with a mortar and pestle. The RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) was used to extract RNA from samples of the ground leaves using the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and concentration of extracted RNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry (MaestroGen, Hsinchu, Taiwan), respectively. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the remaining RNA was eliminated from the cDNA products with RNaseH (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.5.2. Semi-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (semi-qPCR)

The expression of defense-related genes, HbPR-1, HbGLU, and HbASI, was analyzed by semi-qPCR. The GenBank accession no. KM514666 [31], AY325498 [41], and KM979450 [42] were used in the design of the specific primers of HbPR-1, HbGLU, and HbASI genes, respectively. A housekeeping gene, the mitosis protein YLS8 gene (HbMito) of H. brasiliensis (GenBank accession no. HQ323250) [43], was selected as a reference gene. The PCR reaction mixture consisted of EmeraldAmp® PCR Master Mix (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan), 0.25 μM of each gene-specific primer (Table 1), and 4 μL of cDNA template. The reaction was performed with an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min; followed by 35 cycles (for HbPR-1 and HbGLU), and 40 cycles (for HbASI) of denaturing at 94 °C for 1 min; annealing at 60 °C for 30 s; extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 2.0% agarose gel, and visualized under a UV transilluminator and photographed by a gel imager using VisionWorks LS software (UVP BioSpectrum® MultiSpectral Imaging System™, Cambridge, UK) to measure densitometry values of the DNA bands.

Table 1.

Specific primers used for semi-qRT-PCR.

Gene Primer Name Sequence (5ʹ−3ʹ) Amplicon
Size (bp)
GenBank Accession No.
HbPR1 HbPR1-F ATGCCCATAACCAAGCACGAGCAG 364 KM514666
HbPR1-R CCAGGAGGGTCGTAGTTGCATCCA
HbGLU HbGLU-F GCCTTACCAATCCTTCCAATGC 449 AY325498
HbGLU-R ATAACCTCGCTGACCATCCCAC
HbASI HbASI-F GGGCGAAGCCCATATTCACCC 591 KM979450
HbASI-R CAGAAATCAGAAGCAGACTTCTGCG
Hbmitosis protein YLS8 HbMito-F TGGGCTGTTGATCAGGCAATCTTGGC 577 HQ323250
HbMito-R TGTCAGATACATTGCTGCACACAAGGC

4.6. Carrageenan Purification

Strong anion exchange chromatography with a Q sepharose fast flow column (GE Healthcare) was used to purify the SPS (λ-carrageenan) from the CPS. First, the CPS extract (0.25 mg/mL, 25 mL) was loaded into the Q sepharose fast flow column (25 mL volume of gel) at a continuous flow rate of 0.75 mL/min. After that, the column was washed with 25 mL of distilled water. Bound polysaccharides were eluted with 25 mL of 0.4 M NaCl, 30 mL of 0.8 M NaCl, and 25 mL of 1.6 M NaCl, respectively. The phenol-sulfuric acid method was used to determine the eluted polysaccharides in each fraction (2.5 mL). Each fraction was pooled and further desalted by a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare). The desalted solutions were lyophilized into powder.

4.7. Carrageenan Type Identification

Each fraction was determined for functional groups using FTIR. Briefly, one gram of each fraction was ground with spectroscopic grade potassium bromide (KBr) powder, and then pressed into 1 mm pellets for FTIR measurement (wave range of 600 to 4000 cm−1) using a Bruker Vertex70 spectrometer.

4.8. Gel Permeation Chromatography

The purified carrageenan was dissolved in deionized water and then separated by GPC equipment (Shimadzu/LC-10ADvp using Shodex SB 804 HQ as a column). Deionized water at 40 °C was used as the mobile phase to separate carrageenan at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.

4.9. Total Protein Extraction

The treated and control leaves (0.5 g fresh weight) at designated time points were ground into fine powders after freezing with liquid nitrogen and homogenized using a chilled mortar and pestle with 1 mL of cold 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.0 containing 0.25% (v/v) Triton-X and 3% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVPP). The homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and stored at −20 °C for further analysis of enzyme activity.

4.10. Antioxidant Enzyme Gel Staining

For native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), the total proteins extracted from treated leaves were separated by a 4% stacking gel and a 10% separating gel. After 3 h of running at 100 mA, gels were stained with different solutions according to protocols for the detection of catalase and peroxidase activity.

Catalase activity staining was performed according to the method of Woodbury et al. [44]. Briefly, after native PAGE, the gel was immersed in 3 mM H2O2 for 25 min at room temperature and transferred into the staining solution containing 1% K3Fe(CN)6 and 1% FeCl3 for 4 min. To stain peroxidase activity, we followed the method of Stafford and Bravinder-Bree [45]. The gel was immersed in a staining solution consisting of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.4, 0.05% ο-dianisidine, and 0.1 M H2O2 at room temperature for 30 min and fixed with 50% ethanol.

4.11. Toxicity Test

λ-carrageenan at 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL and DW were infiltrated into tobacco leaves for cell death induction. At 5 days post infiltration, treated tobacco leaves were photographed with a digital camera.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

The presented values are mean values ± standard error (SE) from the results of at least three independent biological replicates. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) according to Duncan’s multiple range tests was used to determine significance with P-value ≤ 0.05 using SPSS Statistics 17.0 software. Pairwise comparisons were conducted according to Student’s t test at P-value ≤ 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The effect of CPS from A. spicifera on plant defense response was demonstrated. In rubber tree samples, CPS induced a defense response against P. palmivora infection through the SA signaling pathway. Accumulations of SA and Scp were induced by both CPS and its purified form, so the crude extract was more practical to examine in the field test. However, the λ-carrageenan purification method used by our study would be useful for specific applications in the future.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Excellent Scholarships in Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand; the Graduate School of Prince of Songkla University, Thailand and The Royal Golden Jubilee Graduated Program (RGJ-PHD) through the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) to Mr. Sittiporn Pettongkhao (PHD/0067/2556). We thank the Phetchaburi Coastal Fisheries Research and Development Center, Phetchaburi, Thailand for providing A. spicifera samples. We also thank Tommy Coyne for a generous revision of the manuscript and valuable comments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P. and N.C.; formal analysis, S.P.; investigation, S.P., A.B. and K.K.; supervision, N.C.; writing—original draft, S.P.; writing—review and editing, N.C.

Funding

The Excellent Scholarships in Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand; the Graduate School of Prince of Songkla University, Thailand and The Royal Golden Jubilee Graduated Program (RGJ-PHD) through the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) to Mr. Sittiporn Pettongkhao (PHD/0067/2556).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Dos Santos A.F., Matsuoka K., Alfenas A., Maffia L.A. Identification of Phytophthora species that infect Hevea sp. Fitopatol. Bras. 1995;20:151–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Loon L.C. Mechanisms of Resistance to Plant Diseases. Springer; Dordrecht, Netherlands: 2000. Systemic Induced Resistance; pp. 521–574. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pieterse C.M.J., van Wees S.C.M., Hoffland E., van Pelt J.A., van Loon L.C. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell. 1996;8:1225–1237. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.8.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pieterse C.M.J., van Wees S.C., van Pelt J.A., Knoester M., Laan R., Gerrits H., Weisbeek P.J., van Loon L.C. A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10:1571–1580. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.9.1571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Derksen H., Rampitsch C., Daayf F. Signaling cross-talk in plant disease resistance. Plant Sci. 2013;207:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhao J., Davis L.C., Verpoorte R. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol. Adv. 2005;23:283–333. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dutsadee C., Nunta C. Induction of peroxidase, scopoletin, phenolic compounds and resistance in Hevea brasiliensis by elicitin and a novel protein elicitor purified from Phytophthora palmivora. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008;72:179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chang Y.H., Yan H.Z., Liou R.F. A novel elicitor protein from Phytophthora parasitica induces plant basal immunity and systemic acquired resistance. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015;16:123–136. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mateos F.V., Rickauer M., Esquerré-Tugayé M.T. Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding an elicitor of Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae that shows cellulose-binding and lectin-like activities. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997;10:1045–1053. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.9.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klarzynski O., Plesse B., Joubert J.M., Yvin J.C., Kopp M., Kloareg B., Fritig B. Linear β-1,3 Glucans Are Elicitors of Defense Responses in Tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1027–1038. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.3.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klarzynski O., Descamps V., Plesse B., Yvin J.C., Kloareg B., Fritig B. Sulfated Fucan Oligosaccharides Elicit Defense Responses in Tobacco and Local and Systemic Resistance against Tobacco Mosaic Virus. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2003;16:115–122. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.2.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ghannam A., Abbas A., Alek H., Al Waari Z., Al Ktaifani M. Enhancement of local plant immunity against tobacco mosaic virus infection after treatment with sulphated-carrageenan from red alga (Hypnea musciformis) Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013;84:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2013.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vera J., Castro J., Gonzalez A., Moenne A. Seaweed polysaccharides and derived oligosaccharides stimulate defense responses and protection against pathogens in plants. Mar. Drugs. 2011;9:2514–2525. doi: 10.3390/md9122514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.El Modafar C., Elgadda M., El Boutachfaiti R., Abouraicha E., Zehhar N., Petit E., El Alaoui-Talibi Z., Courtois B., Courtois J. Induction of natural defence accompanied by salicylic acid-dependant systemic acquired resistance in tomato seedlings in response to bioelicitors isolated from green algae. Sci. Hortic. 2012;138:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abouraïcha E., El Alaoui-Talibi Z., El Boutachfaiti R., Petit E., Courtois B., Courtois J., El Modafar C. Induction of natural defense and protection against Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea in apple fruit in response to bioelicitors isolated from green algae. Sci. Hortic. 2015;181:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Parekh R., Doshi Y., Chauhan V. Polysaccharides from marine red algae Acanthophora spicifera, Grateloupia indica and Halymenia porphyroides. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 1989;18:139–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duarte M.E.R., Cauduro J.P., Noseda D.G., Noseda M.D., Gonçalves A.G., Pujol C.A., Damonte E.B., Cerezo A.S. The structure of the agaran sulfate from Acanthophora spicifera (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales) and its antiviral activity. Relation between structure and antiviral activity in agarans. Carbohydr. Res. 2004;339:335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2003.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mercier L., Lafitte C., Borderies G., Briand X., Esquerré-Tugayé M.T., Fournier J. The algal polysaccharide carrageenans can act as an elicitor of plant defence. New Phytol. 2001;149:43–51. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sangha J.S., Khan W., Ji X., Zhang J., Mills A.A.S., Critchley A.T., Prithiviraj B. Carrageenans, sulphated polysaccharides of red seaweeds, differentially affect Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to Trichoplusia ni (Cabbage Looper) PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sangha J.S., Ravichandran S., Prithiviraj K., Critchley A.T., Prithiviraj B. Sulfated macroalgal polysaccharides λ-carrageenan and ι-carrageenan differentially alter Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010;75:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shukla P.S., Borza T., Critchley A.T., Prithiviraj B. Carrageenans from Red Seaweeds As Promoters of Growth and Elicitors of Defense Response in Plants. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016;3:81. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Šandula J., Kogan G., Kačuráková M., MacHová E. Microbial (1→3)-β-d-glucans, their preparation, physico-chemical characterization and immunomodulatory activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 1999;38:247–253. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00099-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Belton P.S., Colquhoun I.J., Grant A., Wellner N., Field J.M., Shewry P.R., Tatham A.S. FTIR and NMR studies on the hydration of a high-M(r) subunit of glutenin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995;17:74–80. doi: 10.1016/0141-8130(95)93520-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barth A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2007;1767:1073–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Roberts M.A., Quemener B. Measurement of carrageenans in food: Challenges, progress, and trends in analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999;10:169–181. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00043-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sekkal M., Legrand P. A spectroscopic investigation of the carrageenans and agar in the 1500–100 cm−1 spectral range. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Spectrosc. 1993;49:209–221. doi: 10.1016/0584-8539(93)80176-B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chopin T., Whalen E. A new and rapid method for carrageenan identification by FT IR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy directly on dried, ground algal material. Carbohydr. Res. 1993;246:51–59. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(93)84023-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cluzet S., Torregrosa C., Jacquet C., Lafitte C., Fournier J., Mercier L., Salamagne S., Briand X., Esquerré-Tugayé M.T., Dumas B. Gene expression profiling and protection of Medicago truncatula against a fungal infection in response to an elicitor from green algae Ulva spp. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27:917–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01197.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ménard R., Alban S., de Ruffray P., Jamois F., Franz G., Fritig B., Yvin J.-C., Kauffmann S. Beta-1,3 glucan sulfate, but not beta-1,3 glucan, induces the salicylic acid signaling pathway in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:3020–3032. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.024968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pieterse C.M.J., Van der Does D., Zamioudis C., Leon-Reyes A., Van Wees S.C.M. Hormonal Modulation of Plant Immunity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012;28:489–521. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khunjan U., Ekchaweng K., Panrat T., Tian M., Churngchow N. Molecular cloning of HbPR-1 gene from rubber tree, expression of HbPR-1 gene in Nicotiana benthamiana and its inhibition of Phytophthora palmivora. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Latijnhouwers M., De Wit P.J.G.M., Govers F. Oomycetes and fungi: Similar weaponry to attack plants. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Necas J., Bartosikova L. Carrageenan: A review. Vet. Med. 2013;58:187–205. doi: 10.17221/6758-VETMED. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Willekens H., Inzé D., Van Montagu M., van Camp W. Catalases in plants. Mol. Breed. New Strateg. Plant Improv. 1995;1:207–228. doi: 10.1007/BF02277422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen Z., Ricigliano J.W., Klessig D.F. Purification and characterization of a soluble salicylic acid-binding protein from tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:9533–9537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen Z., Silva H., Klessig D.F. Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired resistance by salicylic acid. Science. 1993;262:1883–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.8266079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hiraga S., Katsutomo S., Ito H., Yuko O., Hirokazu M. A Large Family of Class III Plant Peroxidases. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:462–468. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Deenamo N., Kuyyogsuy A., Khompatara K., Chanwun T., Ekchaweng K., Churngchow N. Salicylic Acid Induces Resistance in Rubber Tree against Phytophthora palmivora. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1883. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang X., Kang L., Tien P. Resistance of tomato infected with cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA to potato spindle tuber viroid. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1996;129:543–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1996.tb05775.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ederli L., Madeo L., Calderini O., Gehring C., Moretti C., Buonaurio R., Paolocci F., Pasqualini S. The Arabidopsis thaliana cysteine-rich receptor-like kinase CRK20 modulates host responses to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 infection. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:1784–1794. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Thanseem I., Thulaseedharan A. Optimization of RQRT-PCR protocols to measure β-1,3-glucanase mRNA levels in infected tissues of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2006;44:492–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bunyatang O., Chirapongsatonkul N., Bangrak P., Henry R., Churngchow N. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel bi-functional α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor from Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;101:76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li H., Qin Y., Xiao X., Tang C. Screening of valid reference genes for real-time RT-PCR data normalization in Hevea brasiliensis and expression validation of a sucrose transporter gene HbSUT3. Plant Sci. 2011;181:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Woodbury W., Spencer A.K., Stahmann M.A. An improved procedure using ferricyanide for detecting catalase isozymes. Anal. Biochem. 1971;44:301–305. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90375-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stafford H.A., Bravinder-Bree S. Peroxidase isozymes of first internodes of sorghum: Tissue and intracellular localization and multiple peaks of activity isolated by gel filtration chromatography. Plant Physiol. 1972;49:950–956. doi: 10.1104/pp.49.6.950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES