Skip to main content
Population Health Metrics logoLink to Population Health Metrics
. 2019 Apr 18;17:5. doi: 10.1186/s12963-019-0185-9

Correction to: Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality

Andrés Peralta 1,2,3,, Joan Benach 2,3,4, Carme Borrell 1,5,6,7, Verónica Espinel-Flores 1,7, Lucinda Cash-Gibson 2,3, Bernardo L Queiroz 8, Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo 1,5,6,7
PMCID: PMC6474044  PMID: 30999921

Correction to: Popul Health Metrics (2019) 17:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y

Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported a typesetting error in Table 1 that caused the columns of the table to be ordered incorrectly, and a typographical error in a sentence in the Conclusions section.

The incorrect Table 1 was published as:

Table 1.

Provincial and national completeness estimates (2001 – 2010)

Area Women Men
Population 2001 Population 2010 Deaths IC Period Age Range Used Population 2001 Population 2010 Deaths IC Period GGBa Age Range Used SEGb GGB - SEGc Mean GGB a SEG b GGB - SEG c Mean
Azuay 319,974 375,027 12,730 98.82 80.50 66.91 80.03 15–50 279,339 335,739 14,465 107.10 91.49 72.69 88.17 15–50
Bolivar 86,727 93,767 4280 98.81 71.91 71.29 78.83 20–60 83,969 89,975 5100 95.56 79.52 74.28 82.18 25–60
Cañar 111,707 119,621 4187 99.87 57.49 61.89 68.86 20–55 94,639 104,812 5137 95.54 79.06 70.87 80.59 15–50
Carchi 76,891 83,257 3147 80.20 56.76 55.98 62.56 15–50 75,106 80,905 3800 85.18 60.80 62.58 67.92 15–50
Cotopaxi 180,050 209,723 8369 99.92 83.67 72.23 83.79 20–55 169,507 197,990 10,264 101.66 84.40 65.66 81.27 15–50
Chimborazo 213,297 239,339 10,896 96.01 78.20 74.17 81.78 20–55 191,150 219,221 12,414 95.61 93.55 78.81 88.66 20–55
El Oro 258,108 295,256 8020 76.86 55.03 50.83 58.99 15–50 265,561 302,735 12,037 68.33 62.60 55.16 61.55 15–50
Esmeraldas 188,213 262,143 5758 43.07 86.01 63.62 59.33 15–50 197,331 270,912 9675 43.94 106.46 72.29 65.24 15–50
Guayas / Santa Elena 1,654,813 1,975,927 57,031 57.04 57.70 46.62 53.27 15–50 1,643,493 1,968,672 79,288 54.37 67.21 51.12 56.79 15–50
Imbabura 176,064 204,094 8243 101.18 86.67 73.53 85.66 15–55 167,689 193,105 9597 100.32 86.91 74.17 85.82 20–60
Loja 207,913 228,704 8141 100.81 62.41 59.31 70.09 15–50 198,316 221,638 9962 101.55 79.32 71.79 82.45 15–50
Los Rios 315,609 379,883 12,055 75.27 68.77 52.78 64.14 15–50 335,909 398,252 19,140 70.13 77.06 57.89 67.40 15–50
Manabi 592,524 681,575 20,872 82.71 63.62 55.61 65.51 15–50 599,521 689,525 29,639 85.19 74.86 61.20 72.40 15–50
Morona Santiago 57,891 73,126 1327 46.48 39.80 33.43 39.19 15–50 56,904 74,529 1806 54.03 63.17 49.05 54.82 15–50
Napo 38,776 50,641 1029 62.22 67.23 53.19 60.31 15–50 39,965 52,220 1577 71.98 88.74 64.05 73.57 15–50
Pastaza 29,686 41,394 718 40.59 73.71 56.18 53.57 15–50 31,808 42,084 1053 45.81 61.87 48.02 51.01 15–50
Pichincha / Santo Domingo 1,218,916 1,504,023 42,824 72.07 81.98 65.03 72.37 20–55 1,167,281 1,441,529 52,093 64.46 81.18 63.62 68.89 15–50
Tungurahua 227,308 258,907 10,747 98.69 83.24 82.22 87.44 15–55 213,470 244,014 12,569 99.48 87.86 78.87 87.94 15–55
Zamora Chinchipe 37,017 43,780 976 53.53 45.88 39.20 45.46 15–50 39,462 46,627 1391 47.16 52.06 41.78 46.62 15–50
Galapagos 8137 11,392 123 12.58 35.10 30.43 21.30 15–50 9618 12,238 187 25.46 45.66 38.83 34.51 15–50
Sucumbíos 58,774 83,431 1279 22.00 49.52 41.57 33.45 15–50 67,901 91,050 2589 28.53 58.70 46.24 40.70 15–50
Orellana 39,478 64,034 1073 28.85 105.65 74.30 52.10 15–50 45,147 70,655 1766 36.30 126.62 79.87 62.54 15–50
Ecuador 6,132,183 7,293,907 224,300 71.97 67.67 57.21 65.00 15–50 6,010,246 7,165,170 296,474 71.76 74.68 60.09 68.23 15–50

a Generalized growth balance method

b Synthetic extinct generations method

c Hybrid generalized growth balance and synthetic extinct generations method

The correct Table 1 should be:

Table 1.

Provincial and national completeness estimates (2001 – 2010)

Area Women Men
Population 2001 Population 2010 Deaths IC Period Completeness (%) Age Range Used Population 2001 Population 2010 Deaths IC Period Completeness (%) Age Range Used
GGBa SEGb GGB - SEGc Mean GGBa SEGb GGB - SEGc Mean
Azuay 319,974 375,027 12,730 98.82 80.50 66.91 80.03 15 - 50 279,339 335,739 14,465 107.10 91.49 72.69 88.17 15 - 50
Bolivar 86,727 93,767 4,280 98.81 71.91 71.29 78.83 20 - 60 83,969 89,975 5,100 95.56 79.52 74.28 82.18 25 - 60
Cañar 111,707 119,621 4,187 99.87 57.49 61.89 68.86 20 - 55 94,639 104,812 5,137 95.54 79.06 70.87 80.59 15 - 50
Carchi 76,891 83,257 3,147 80.20 56.76 55.98 62.56 15 - 50 75,106 80,905 3,800 85.18 60.80 62.58 67.92 15 - 50
Cotopaxi 180,050 209,723 8,369 99.92 83.67 72.23 83.79 20 - 55 169,507 197,990 10,264 101.66 84.40 65.66 81.27 15 - 50
Chimborazo 213,297 239,339 10,896 96.01 78.20 74.17 81.78 20 - 55 191,150 219,221 12,414 95.61 93.55 78.81 88.66 20 - 55
El Oro 258,108 295,256 8,020 76.86 55.03 50.83 58.99 15 - 50 265,561 302,735 12,037 68.33 62.60 55.16 61.55 15 - 50
Esmeraldas 188,213 262,143 5,758 43.07 86.01 63.62 59.33 15 - 50 197,331 270,912 9,675 43.94 106.46 72.29 65.24 15 - 50
Guayas / Santa Elena 1,654,813 1,975,927 57,031 57.04 57.70 46.62 53.27 15 - 50 1,643,493 1,968,672 79,288 54.37 67.21 51.12 56.79 15 - 50
Imbabura 176,064 204,094 8,243 101.18 86.67 73.53 85.66 15 - 55 167,689 193,105 9,597 100.32 86.91 74.17 85.82 20 - 60
Loja 207,913 228,704 8,141 100.81 62.41 59.31 70.09 15 - 50 198,316 221,638 9,962 101.55 79.32 71.79 82.45 15 - 50
Los Rios 315,609 379,883 12,055 75.27 68.77 52.78 64.14 15 - 50 335,909 398,252 19,140 70.13 77.06 57.89 67.40 15 - 50
Manabi 592,524 681,575 20,872 82.71 63.62 55.61 65.51 15 - 50 599,521 689,525 29,639 85.19 74.86 61.20 72.40 15 - 50
Morona Santiago 57,891 73,126 1,327 46.48 39.80 33.43 39.19 15 - 50 56,904 74,529 1,806 54.03 63.17 49.05 54.82 15 - 50
Napo 38,776 50,641 1,029 62.22 67.23 53.19 60.31 15 - 50 39,965 52,220 1,577 71.98 88.74 64.05 73.57 15 - 50
Pastaza 29,686 41,394 718 40.59 73.71 56.18 53.57 15 - 50 31,808 42,084 1,053 45.81 61.87 48.02 51.01 15 - 50
Pichincha / Santo Domingo 1,218,916 1,504,023 42,824 72.07 81.98 65.03 72.37 20 - 55 1,167,281 1,441,529 52,093 64.46 81.18 63.62 68.89 15 - 50
Tungurahua 227,308 258,907 10,747 98.69 83.24 82.22 87.44 15 - 55 213,470 244,014 12,569 99.48 87.86 78.87 87.94 15 - 55
Zamora Chinchipe 37,017 43,780 976 53.53 45.88 39.20 45.46 15 - 50 39,462 46,627 1,391 47.16 52.06 41.78 46.62 15 - 50
Galapagos 8,137 11,392 123 12.58 35.10 30.43 21.30 15 - 50 9,618 12,238 187 25.46 45.66 38.83 34.51 15 - 50
Sucumbíos 58,774 83,431 1,279 22.00 49.52 41.57 33.45 15 - 50 67,901 91,050 2,589 28.53 58.70 46.24 40.70 15 - 50
Orellana 39,478 64,034 1,073 28.85 105.65 74.30 52.10 15 - 50 45,147 70,655 1,766 36.30 126.62 79.87 62.54 15 - 50
Ecuador 6,132,183 7,293,907 224,300 71.97 67.67 57.21 65.00 15 - 50 6,010,246 7,165,170 296,474 71.76 74.68 60.09 68.23 15 - 50

aGeneralized growth balance method

bSynthetic extinct generations method

cHybrid generalized growth balance and synthetic extinct generations method

In the Conclusion section the incorrect sentence was:

“Galapagos has a low percentage of garbage codes (high quality) and also a low and also a low completeness estimate.”

It should say:

“Galapagos has a low percentage of garbage codes (high quality) and also a low completeness estimate.”

The original article has been corrected. The publisher apologizes to the readers and the authors for any inconvenience caused by these errors.

Reference

  • 1.Peralta A, et al. Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality. Popul Health Metrics. 2019;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Population Health Metrics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES