Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2019 Apr 12;10:758. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00758

Marine Deep Biosphere Microbial Communities Assemble in Near-Surface Sediments in Aarhus Bay

Caitlin Petro 1,*,†,, Birthe Zäncker 1,†,, Piotr Starnawski 1, Lara M Jochum 1, Timothy G Ferdelman 2, Bo Barker Jørgensen 1, Hans Røy 1, Kasper U Kjeldsen 1, Andreas Schramm 1
PMCID: PMC6474314  PMID: 31031732

Abstract

Analyses of microbial diversity in marine sediments have identified a core set of taxa unique to the marine deep biosphere. Previous studies have suggested that these specialized communities are shaped by processes in the surface seabed, in particular that their assembly is associated with the transition from the bioturbated upper zone to the nonbioturbated zone below. To test this hypothesis, we performed a fine-scale analysis of the distribution and activity of microbial populations within the upper 50 cm of sediment from Aarhus Bay (Denmark). Sequencing and qPCR were combined to determine the depth distributions of bacterial and archaeal taxa (16S rRNA genes) and sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) (dsrB gene). Mapping of radionuclides throughout the sediment revealed a region of intense bioturbation at 0–6 cm depth. The transition from bioturbated sediment to the subsurface below (7 cm depth) was marked by a shift from dominant surface populations to common deep biosphere taxa (e.g., Chloroflexi and Atribacteria). Changes in community composition occurred in parallel to drops in microbial activity and abundance caused by reduced energy availability below the mixed sediment surface. These results offer direct evidence for the hypothesis that deep subsurface microbial communities present in Aarhus Bay mainly assemble already centimeters below the sediment surface, below the bioturbation zone.

Keywords: marine sediment, 16S rRNA, dsrB, biodiversity, sulfate reducing microorganisms, microbial community assembly

Introduction

Marine sediments are a massive microbial habitat, harboring as many as 5.39 × 1029 prokaryotic cells on a global scale and 0.18–3.6% of Earth’s total living biomass (Kallmeyer et al., 2012; Parkes et al., 2014). Microorganisms deposited on the sediment surface are gradually buried into the seabed as sedimenting particulate matter accumulates on the seafloor. This burial can isolate microorganisms from the surface world for hundreds to millions of years, cutting populations off from fresh detrital organic matter and subjecting them to severe energetic limitations that increase with sediment depth (Middelburg, 1989; Langerhuus et al., 2012; Lomstein et al., 2012). Despite these energy limitations, deep marine sediments are populated by living microbial communities that persist down to 2.5 km below the seafloor (reviewed in Parkes et al., 2014; Inagaki et al., 2015). Phylogenetic diversity (16S rRNA gene) analyses of the subsurface environment have identified a core set of uncultivated microbial taxa that have become synonymous with the marine deep biosphere (Biddle et al., 2006; Teske, 2006; Orcutt et al., 2011; Kubo et al., 2012; Parkes et al., 2014; Carr et al., 2015). But at which sediment depth and by which processes these deep subsurface communities are formed remains unclear.

Work thus far has suggested that selective survival is the major driver of microbial community assembly in subsurface marine sediments (Walsh et al., 2015; Jochum et al., 2017; Petro et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). Selection filters out populations during burial, creating a deep subsurface biosphere that is populated by rare descendants of the surface sediment community (Jochum et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). Persisting taxa exhibit little genetic diversification across sediment depths, suggesting that adaptation to deep biosphere conditions plays a limited role in driving the assembly of the deep subsurface community (Starnawski et al., 2017). The lack of adaptive evolution is likely due to the exceedingly long generation times encountered within marine sediments, and thus the limited number of generations, which limit the potential for genetic change during burial (reviewed in Lever et al., 2015a; Jørgensen and Marshall, 2016).

Shortest generation times have been estimated near the sediment surface, owing to the availability of freshly deposited organic matter and high potential electron acceptors (e.g., oxygen and nitrate), which collectively promote community growth and turnover (Langerhuus et al., 2012; Lomstein et al., 2012; Hoehler and Jørgensen, 2013). Microbial activity is further stimulated near the sediment surface due to bioturbation by benthic macrofauna. Bioturbation processes include faunal burrow construction and maintenance, both of which continually rework and irrigate the upper 10 ± 5 cm of the seabed (Boudreau, 1998; Meysman et al., 2006). While bioturbation occurs globally, both the intensity of bioturbation and the depth of mixing are influenced by factors such as seasonality and depth of the overlying water column (Teal et al., 2008). Water depth was shown to play a minor role in driving differences in bioturbation between sites, indicating that the intensity and depth of mixing are only marginally different between coastal and deep ocean sediments. In addition to enhancing the dispersal of microbial cells, bioturbation also increases microbial energy availability by introducing labile organic matter and oxygen from the overlying water column into the seabed (Kristensen and Holmer, 2001; Kristensen et al., 2012). Bioturbation has been shown to influence microbial communities near the seafloor, most notably by driving the dominance of Bacteria relative to Archaea (Chen et al., 2017) that has been observed repeatedly in surface sediments (Lipp et al., 2008; Giovannelli et al., 2013).

Below the bioturbation zone, sediments exhibit a vertical geochemical zonation that results from the thermodynamically driven succession of available electron acceptors in the sediment (Froehlich et al., 1979; Canfield et al., 1993). In organic-rich coastal marine sediments, the sulfate reduction (SR) zone occurs immediately below the bioturbation zone (Jørgensen, 1982). Here, sulfate is the main electron acceptor for microbial respiration. Below the SR zone, the sulfate-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane takes place within a narrow zone defined as the sulfate-methane transition (SMT) (Thomsen et al., 2001; Leloup et al., 2007; Knittel and Boetius, 2009). Each biogeochemical process is mediated by a unique guild of terminal oxidizers, such as sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) and methanogens, respectively.

Analyses of subsurface microbial diversity across geochemical zones in Aarhus Bay sediments have shown that communities change most dramatically between the surface environment and the SR zone below (Chen et al., 2017; Jochum et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). Below the SR zone, a large fraction of the microbial community is more stable and persists with burial into the deep subsurface. It was therefore suggested that the assembly of subsurface communities is associated with the transition from the bioturbated surface zone of the sediment to the unmixed sediment zones below (Jochum et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). To test this hypothesis, we performed a fine-scale analysis of the distribution and activity of microbial populations present within the upper 50 cm of sediment from Aarhus Bay (Denmark). Because patterns of microbial diversity across sediment depths in Aarhus Bay are highly reproducible between sampling sites (Chen et al., 2017; Jochum et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017), we chose to explore these patterns at high-resolution within sediment collected from one well-studied sampling site, station M5 (Langerhuus et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2017). Sediment cores were approached as a vertical transect, with the aim of examining population dynamics associated with burial of resident microbial communities over time. Next-generation sequencing was employed to determine the distributions of bacterial and archaeal taxa (16S rRNA gene) as well as SRM, using the gene encoding the beta subunit of the dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase (dsrB) as a marker gene (Müller et al., 2014). This approach was utilized in order to compare population dynamics of the total microbial community with a known guild of terminal oxidizers SRM. Sequencing was coupled with quantitative PCR (qPCR) and total cell counts (TCC) in order to map changes in the absolute abundances of dominant taxa at each depth. Sulfate reduction rates were measured as a proxy for microbial activity and overall organic carbon mineralization in the sediment and the vertical extent of the bioturbation zone was mapped by determining radionuclide distributions.

Experimental Procedures

Sampling

A sediment core was taken by Rumohr Corer during a cruise with the RV Aurora in September 2014 at Aarhus Bay (Denmark) station M5 (56° 06.333′N, 10° 27.800′E; water depth 27 m). This core was used for all subsequent analyses unless otherwise noted. The sediment core was stored and sampled at 15°C, corresponding to the in situ temperature of the bottom water. Subsamples for DNA extractions, sulfate reduction rate measurements, and cell counts were collected with sterile, pre-cut 2.5 ml syringes from the intact core. Samples were taken in 1 cm increments from the top down to 40 cm, with three additional deeper reference samples at 45, 48 and 50 cm depth.

In order to assess the reproducibility of our results across multiple cores and sampling times, we took four additional Rumohr cores from site M5 in both 2017 and 2018. The processing and analysis of these cores are described in the Supplementary Material.

Sulfate Reduction Rates (SRR)

Sulfate Reduction Rates were determined in 1 cm intervals using the 35S-tracer technique (Røy et al., 2014). Subsamples of 2.0 cm3 were taken with cut-off syringes that had been covered with Parafilm®and inserted cut-side down into anoxic marine sediment to prevent the samples from becoming oxygenated during processing. 0.5 cm3 of sediment from each subsample was transferred into a microcentrifuge tube and pelleted by centrifugation. The supernatant was collected and used to measure the sulfate concentration in the pore water by Ion Chromatography (Dionex IC 2000, Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). The remaining sediment was injected with 10 μl of 35S-SO42- radiotracer (20 kBq μl-1) and incubated for 5 h in the dark at 15°C under anoxic conditions. To stop the incubations, the samples were transferred into 5 ml of 20% Zn-acetate solution and stored at -20°C. Total reduced inorganic sulfur was separated from sulfate and reduced to sulfide by the cold chromium distillation procedure (Kallmeyer et al., 2004 with modifications by Røy et al., 2014). The radioactivity was measured on a Packard Tri-Carb 2900 TR Liquid Scintillation Analyzer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, United States). Blanks consisting of sediment killed with 20% Zn-acetate prior to radiotracer injection were measured in parallel. The background radioactivity of the equipment and reagents was tested using samples containing only 5 ml Zn-acetate and Ecoscint XR (BioNordika, Herlev, Denmark). SRR were calculated according to Jørgensen (1978).

Distribution of 210Pb (Excess) and 137Cs

Sediment samples for determination of 210Pb, 226Ra, 137Cs, and 40K distributions were derived from a separate, 51 cm long core collected from station M5 in April 2016. The core was extruded from the liner and cut into 1 cm sections. The sections were dried at 105°C for 2 days, finely ground, and precisely weighed into polysulfone screw-top containers with approximately 20 g of sediment per sample. The samples were sealed with electrical tape and stored for 20 days to allow 222Rn ingrowth to secular equilibrium before counting. The radioactivities of 210Pb (46.5 keV), 214Pb (295 and 352 keV), 214Bi (609 keV), 137Cs (662 keV) and 40K (1405 keV) were then measured by low-level gamma-spectroscopy (Eurysis Ge Coaxial Type N detector, Canberra Industries, Rüsselsheim, Germany). A detector efficiency-energy curve was calibrated using a certified reference U-Th ore (Canmet DL-1a) and laboratory grade KCl (for 40K). Sediment self-absorption at 45.5 keV was corrected according to the method of Cutshall et al. (1983). The activity of 210Pb supported by the sediment’s natural contents of daughters of the 238U decay chain was estimated from the activity of 226Ra. 226Ra was estimated from daughter nuclide activities of 214Pb (295 and 352 keV), 214Bi (609 keV), assuming secular equilibrium between 226Ra, 222Rn, 214Bi, and 214Pb. 226Ra-supported 210Pb was then subtracted from the total 210Pb activity to estimate the excess 210Pb derived via deposition.

Calculation of Bioturbation

A numerical model was set up to calculate the magnitude of sediment mixing by reverse modeling of the distributions of 137Cs and excess 210Pb in the upper 36 cm of sediment. A constant flux of 210Pb, corresponding to the depth-integrated rate of measured excess 210Pb activity, was imposed across the sediment surface. During runtime 210Pb was allowed to decay with a half-life of 22.3 years. Sedimentation was simulated by imposing downward advection at 0.96 mm year-1 according to the mean sedimentation rate at station M5 (derived from 14C age determination of bivalve shells, Langerhuus et al., 2012). The model was divided into two depth-domains with independently controlled rates of bioturbation to simulate the distinct change in bioturbation between the upper 5.75 ± 5.67 cm “mixed zone” and the deeper sediment (Teal et al., 2008). The model was allowed to run until steady state. The division-depth between the upper and the lower zone, and the rate of mixing in the two zones, were then adjusted iteratively to give the best fit to the measured distribution of excess 210Pb activity.

A second iteration of the model was initiated with one unit of 137Cs in the upper one mm of the sediment, simulating the deposition of fall-out from the Chernobyl nuclear accident. 137Cs was then allowed to decay with a half-life of 30.17 years and allowed to move by the same bio-diffusion and convection as 210Pb. This iteration of the model was run for 29 years, corresponding to the time from the Chernobyl nuclear accident in April 1986 to the sediment core collection in April 2016. The rates of bioturbation in the two depth-zones were again adjusted iteratively to simultaneously achieve the best steady-state simulation of the measured depth-distributions of 210Pb and the best transient distribution of 137Cs activity. The model was implemented in Comsol Multiphysics.

Total Cell Counts (TCC)

Sediment subsamples of 1 mL were preserved 1:2 (v/v) in 4% Paraformaldehyde (w/v) and stored at 4°C until further processing. The fixed samples were homogenized and cells detached from sediment particles according to the protocol by Lavergne et al. (2014). The cells were stained with SYBR Gold (1 μl 10,000X in 10 ml 1X PBS) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 μg ml-1) and analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 200, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

DNA Extractions

Sediment subsamples for DNA extraction were stored at -80°C prior to processing. To avoid contamination from the sampling equipment, sediment that was in contact with the core liner was discarded. Approximately 0.2 g of sediment was used for each DNA extraction, which included an initial washing step to remove extracellular DNA (Lever et al., 2015b). After washing, cells were lyzed by enzymatic treatments (Kjeldsen et al., 2007) followed by incubation at 65°C for 2 h in 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate. At this point, the DNA was extracted using the FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Holte, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantification of 16S rRNA and dsrB Genes

Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes were quantified by qPCR according to Starnawski et al. (2017) using the primer pairs Bac908F/Bac1075R (Ohkuma and Kudo, 1998) and Arch915Fmod/Arch1059R (Cadillo-Quiroz et al., 2006), respectively. SRM abundance was estimated by qPCR of the dsrB gene as described by Jochum et al. (2017). DNA extraction efficiency was calculated by comparing TCC to 16S rRNA gene copy numbers generated from qPCR, assuming that bacteria and archaea on average harbor 4.1 and 1.6 16S rRNA gene copies cell-1, respectively (Stoddard et al., 2015). Using this approach, we estimated an average DNA extraction efficiency of 7% for all depths.

Ion Torrent PGM Sequencing and Analysis

The bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the primer pair Univ519F/Univ802R (Wang and Qian, 2009; Claesson et al., 2010). This primer pair is compatible with Ion Torrent sequencing and has excellent predicted coverage of both bacterial and archaeal taxonomic diversity (Klindworth et al., 2013). The amplified ∼283-bp long fragment was barcoded and sequenced on an Ion Torrent PGM using 300 bp chemistry (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, United States). Amplification, sequencing, and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene were all done according to Starnawski et al. (2017). Reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% similarity cutoff using the UPARSE-OTU algorithm implemented in the usearch v7.0.959_i86osx32 software (Edgar, 2013). Representative sequences of each of the 2431 OTUs identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MG637451MG639881.

Dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase sequencing was performed according to Jochum et al. (2017) using the primer variant mixtures dsrB-F1a-h and dsrB-4RSI1a-f (Lever, 2013). The resultant dsrB sequence libraries were filtered and analyzed using the pipeline described in Jochum et al. (2017). Species-level OTUs were clustered at a 90% similarity cutoff using pick_otus.py from the QIIME package (Caporaso et al., 2010). The taxonomic identity of SRM was resolved by classifying translations of quality-filtered reads according to the taxonomic framework proposed by Müller et al. (2014), with modifications and procedures described by Jochum et al. (2017). Representative OTU sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MG742726MG744217.

The classified OTUs were transferred to the R statistical environment (Version 3.4.2), where all additional analyses were performed. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations were calculated on the OTU level, both for the total microbial community and the SRM community. Prior to ordination, the OTU abundance tables were randomly subsampled to even sequencing depth using the rarefy_even_depth function in the phyloseq package (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013). The NMDS coordinates were calculated from the subsampled datasets using the metaMDS function implemented in the vegan package (Oksanen et al., 2017).

Estimates of Biomass Turnover Times

Sulfate Reduction Rates measurements were combined with qPCR data to estimate per-cell metabolic rates (csSRR) and microbial biomass turnover times. For these calculations, dsrB gene copy numbers were used to estimate the abundance of SRM, assuming one dsrB gene per genome and a DNA extraction efficiency of 7% (Wagner et al., 2005). Biomass turnover times (Tb) were estimated by dividing the biomass present within a given depth by the rate of biomass production. The biomass was calculated by multiplying the number of SRM (cells per g sediment) with the amount of carbon contained within a single cell [assuming an average cellular carbon content of 21.5 fg C per cell as empirically determined for subseafloor cell populations (Braun et al., 2016)]. The rate of production was calculated from the measured SRR (nmol g-1 sediment d-1) and an estimated growth yield [8% according to D’Hondt et al. (2014)], assuming 2 moles of organic carbon oxidized per mole of sulfate reduced. The cumulative generation times per depth interval were calculated using an estimated sedimentation rate of 0.96 mm year-1 (Langerhuus et al., 2012).

Results

Geochemistry and Microbial Activity

Pore water sulfate concentrations at site M5 decreased steeply with sediment depth from ∼27 mM at 3 cm below seafloor (cmbsf) to ∼2 mM at the deepest analyzed coring depth of 50 cmbsf (Figure 1A). Alignment of the sulfate concentrations with a methane profile taken previously from the same site revealed a SMT between 45 and 55 cmbsf. The sulfate and methane profiles were reproduced in the cores taken in 2017 and 2018, indicating that the geochemical conditions at site M5 are stable over time (Supplementary Figure S6). Maximum rates of sulfate reduction (177–218 nmol cm-3 d-1) occurred at 1–3 cmbsf (Figure 1B). Below 3 cmbsf, the SRR dropped steeply with depth, reaching ∼ 0.4 nmol cm-3 d-1 at 50 cmbsf. Much like the sulfate and methane profiles, this pattern was highly reproducible across years (Supplementary Figure S6).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) Geochemical zonation of site M5, Aarhus Bay (Denmark). The sulfate profile (•) was measured in the present study, while the methane profile (□) was obtained from previous work at the same site (H R, unpublished). (B) Sulfate reduction rates (SRR). (C) Profile of excess 210Pb and (D) 137Cs in the surface of site M5. Error bars represent 1 sigma standard deviation of gamma counting uncertainty. Gray shading indicates the onset of the sulfate methane transition (SMT). The dashed lines indicate the bottom of the highly mixed surface layer, or bioturbation zone, based on modeling of excess 210Pb and 137Cs.

Sediment Mixing

According to measurements of excess 210Pb and 137Cs activity a region of intense mixing is present from 0 to 6 cmbsf (Figure 1). Below this depth range, 210Pb activity dropped logarithmically, but penetrated deeper than what would be expected from the balance between burial and decay. The effects of mixing were even more evident with 137Cs originating from the Chernobyl nuclear accident, which should be found as a distinct peak at 2.3 cm below the sediment surface in the absence of sediment mixing (Moros et al., 2017). Mixing in the upper 6 cm alone would increase penetration to maximum 8.3 cm, but the radioisotope was present at least to 20 cmbsf. Reverse modeling of the depth distribution of 210Pb and 137Cs suggested a bio-diffusion coefficient of at least 10-2 m2 year-1 in the upper 6 cm, and near 4 × 10-5 m2 year-1 in the zone between 6 and 35 cmbsf.

Vertical Distribution of Bacteria and Archaea

Total cell counts and qPCR data showed a sharp drop in microbial abundance between the sediment surface and the bottom of the zone of more intense bioturbation (0–6 cmbsf) referred to as the “bioturbation zone” below (Figure 2). Within this region, TCC dropped by 65%, while bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene copy numbers dropped by 86 and 70%, respectively. 16S rRNA gene copy numbers followed the same distribution exhibited by TCC, but with lower abundances (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Distribution of microbial abundances with depth. Bacterial, archaeal, and sulfate reducing microorganisms (SRM) were quantified by qPCR. Total cell counts (TCC) were quantified by direct epifluorescence microscopy of microbial cells. The dashed line indicates the depth of the bottom of the bioturbation zone and the gray shading indicates the onset of the SMT.

Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of 16S rRNA gene sequence OTU distributions revealed that the most pronounced change in OTU composition occurred between 3 and 7 cmbsf, corresponding exactly to the bottom of the bioturbation zone (Figure 3A). Below the bioturbation zone samples clustered together, indicating that they harbored more similar communities when compared to the communities present within the bioturbation zone. Samples assigned to the subsurface (SR, 7–36 cmbsf) and the bottom of the core (SMT, 48–50 cmbsf) also clustered together, suggesting that the composition of the microbial community below the bioturbation zone is relatively stable and changes only gradually with depth (Figure 3A).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Changes in the microbial community with depth. (A,C) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of subsampled sequencing datasets for all Bacteria and Archaea (A) and SRM lineages (C). NMDS ordinations were calculated at the OTU level (B,D) Stacked bar plots of the relative sequence abundances for the total community (B) and the SRM lineages (D).

Proteobacteria sequences were negatively associated with depth (Spearman, r = -0.73, P < 0.001) and dropped in relative abundance from 60% in the bioturbation zone to 30% at 7–8 cmbsf and 18% at 50 cmbsf (Figure 3B). The drop in Proteobacteria sequences was primarily driven by sequences belonging to the Gammaproteobacteria, which dropped from 30% in the bioturbation zone to 1–10% in the subsurface below (Supplementary Figure S1).

In contrast to the Proteobacteria, sequences clustering within the Chloroflexi were positively associated with depth (Spearman, r = 0.57, P < 0.01) and increased in relative abundance from 3% at 3 cmbsf to 16% at 8 cmbsf (Figure 3B). The increase in relative abundance of Chloroflexi was primarily driven by OTUs belonging to the class Dehalococcoidia, which increased from <1% of total sequencing reads in the surface to 12% at 50 cmbsf (Supplementary Figure S1). A similar positive correlation with depth was observed for sequences clustering within the Atribacteria (Spearman, r = 0.84, P < 0.001), which comprised <0.01% of total sequences in the bioturbation zone. A small community of Atribacteria began to develop immediately below the bioturbation zone (3% of total sequences at 7 cmbsf), and increased to 13% at 50 cmbsf (Figure 3B).

Major taxonomic shifts seen for dominant phyla were also observable on the OTU level. Mapping of the 25 most abundant OTUs at different depths throughout the core revealed a dramatic change in the OTU community composition right below the bioturbation zone (7 cmbsf), from a community dominated by Proteobacteria to more diverse high-ranking OTUs belonging to the Chloroflexi, Atribacteria, and several archaeal phyla (Supplementary Figure S2). The OTUs that appeared right below the bioturbation zone (7–10 cmbsf) continued to increase in rank with increasing sediment depth. By 50 cmbsf, the 25 most dominant OTUs comprised 45% of the total sequencing reads, with a single Atribacteria OTU accounting for 12% of the total microbial community. Similar taxonomic shifts within bacterial phyla were also seen in the cores taken from 2017, including a marked increase in the relative abundances of Atribacteria and Chloroflexi occurring between 5 and 10 cmbsf (Supplementary Figure S7A). Our separate analyses of archaeal lineages from the cores taken in 2018 also show changes in the archaeal community across depths (Supplementary Figure S7B). Most notably we see an increase in the relative abundance of Lokiarchaeota with depth, a class within the newly characterized Asgard Archaea clade (Spang et al., 2015; Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka et al., 2017). There is also a stark decrease in the relative abundance of Thaumarchaeota, specifically the class Nitrososphaeria, with increasing depth.

In a separate analysis, we traced OTUs across depths in order to identify OTUs from the surface that persisted to the bottom of the core (Supplementary Figure S3). This revealed 92 OTUs that were present in every sequenced depth, from the bioturbation zone to 50 cmbsf. While this set of persisting OTUs represented only 12% of the total OTU richness at 50 cmbsf, they comprised 45% of the total sequencing reads (Supplementary Figure S3). By converting OTU relative abundances to absolute abundances using qPCR data (Starnawski et al., 2017), we found that several OTUs also increased in absolute abundance with depth, running counter to the drop in absolute abundance observed for the total microbial community and the majority of dominant surface OTUs (Figure 4). The OTUs which increased in absolute abundance with depth (Supplementary Table S1) belong to common subsurface lineages such as the Atribacteria and members of the class Phycisphaerae, both of which have been found to constitute a significant portion of the microbial community hundreds of meters below the seafloor (Petro et al., 2017).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Estimated absolute abundances of the most dominant OTUs identified by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. Absolute abundances were calculated by multiplying relative sequence abundances by gene copy numbers obtained from qPCR of the 16S rRNA gene, assuming an average of 4.1 and 1.6 16S rRNA operons per cell for bacteria and archaea, respectively. The top ten most abundant OTUs present at 3 cmbsf are displayed in (A) and the top ten most abundant OTUs present at 50 cmbsf are displayed in (B). The color represents the log10 absolute abundance of each OTU. Gray areas represent depths where no sequences were recovered for the specified OTU.

Vertical Distribution of Sulfate Reducing Microorganisms (SRM)

Both qPCR and sequencing analysis of dsrB genes indicated that SRM were present throughout the entire depth profile (Figure 2, 3D). DsrB gene copy numbers equated to 5–30% of the 16S rRNA gene copy numbers, with the highest relative abundance occurring within the bioturbation zone (Figure 2). The dsrB gene copy number showed a strong positive correlation to the sulfate reduction rate (R2 = 0.86, P < 0.001; Supplementary Figure S4), highlighting dsrB gene quantification as a means to estimate SRM abundance. Furthermore, the depth-associated pattern of dsrB gene copy numbers could be reproduced in cores sampled in 2017 and 2018 (Supplementary Figure S8).

Sequencing analysis of the dsrB gene grouped the OTUs into 44 different lineages. NMDS ordination of the OTUs revealed a marked change in community composition between the bioturbated samples and the subsurface below, producing a similar pattern as was seen for the total community (Figure 3C). The surface samples were dominated by OTUs classified as Uncultured Desulfobacteraceae lineage A (Jochum et al., 2017) and Syntrophobacteraceae-like DsrAB, which collectively comprised nearly 60% of the total sequences at 3 cmbsf (Figure 3D). While the relative abundances of these lineages decreased with depth, OTUs belonging to the Aarhus Bay lineage (Jochum et al., 2017) and the Uncultured Desulfobacteraceae lineage F (Jochum et al., 2017) became increasingly dominant downcore (Figure 3D). OTUs classified within the Aarhus Bay lineage comprised less than 0.01% of sequencing reads within the bioturbation zone, but increased to nearly 40% of the total sequencing reads at the bottom of the core (Figure 3D).

Absolute abundance estimates were calculated for each lineage by multiplying dsrB gene copy numbers by relative sequence abundances, assuming one copy of the gene per cell (Wagner et al., 2005). Figure 5 displays the three most prominent depth-associated trends in absolute abundances amongst the different lineages. Among these, we observed a marked drop in the abundance of OTUs belonging to the Uncultured Desulfobacteraceae lineage A, which declined by nearly one order of magnitude between the sediment surface and 7 cmbsf. This was a common trend for other predominant lineages, with substantial decreases in population size occurring for 8 out of the 15 most abundant SRM lineages (Supplementary Figure S5). This steep drop in population sizes occurred in parallel to the rapid population growth of the Desulfobacteraceae lineage F, which took over as the dominant lineage below the bioturbation zone. This lineage was depleted again near the bottom of the SR zone (26–48 cmbsf), reaching a minimum abundance of 1.4 × 106 (gene copies g-1 sediment). Within the same depth interval, members of the Aarhus Bay lineage became quantitatively dominant, reaching a maximum abundance of 2.1 × 106 (gene copies g-1 sediment) at 50 cmbsf (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Absolute abundance profiles of three selected SRM lineages, representing three prominent population trends with depth. (A) Desulfobacteraceae Lineage A, declining with depth (B) Desulfobacteraceae Lineage F, clear maximum in the SR zone (C) Aarhus Bay Lineage, increasing with depth. Absolute abundances were estimated by multiplying sequence percent abundances by dsrB gene copy numbers, as determined by qPCR. Blank spaces indicate a lack of sequencing data.

Cell-Specific SRR and Community Turnover

Measurements of SRR and SRM abundance were used to calculate csSRR throughout the core. The abundance of the total SRM community was estimated by dividing dsrB gene copy numbers by 7%, corresponding to the calculated DNA extraction efficiency. The csSRR were highest at the sediment surface, peaking at 0.07 fmol cell-1 day-1 at 3 cmbsf, and then decreasing toward a more constant value at 30–50 cmbsf (Figure 6A). This pattern was reproduced by samples taken across broader depth intervals in 2017 and 2018, indicating that microbial activity in the system is relatively stable over years (Supplementary Figure S6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

(A) Estimates of cell-specific sulfate reduction rates (csSRR) in the sediment core. (B) Estimated biomass turnover times of the total SRM community. (C) Cumulative generations possible throughout the sediment core. All values were estimated using dsrB gene copy numbers as a proxy for SRM abundance, assuming a 7% DNA extraction efficiency. Gray shading indicates the onset of the SMT. Dashed lines in the surface indicate the bottom of the bioturbation zone.

Rates of SR were then used to calculate the amount of time required for complete turnover of SRM biomass (Tb) within a given depth interval. Turnover times increased with depth below the bioturbation zone (Figure 6B), with an average value of 6 ± 4 years. Biomass turnover times were used to generate a profile of the number of cumulative generations that a community could undergo during burial (Figure 6C). The resulting profile indicated that a large fraction of possible generations within the depth profile could occur within the uppermost centimeters of the sediment column. Once buried below the bioturbation zone, the community would have undergone over 40% of the total generations possible within the 50 cm depth interval.

Discussion

The Influence of Bioturbation on Community Assembly

Four processes—diversification, dispersal, selection, and drift, have been proposed as major drivers of microbial community assembly (Nemergut et al., 2013). These processes have been examined within the context of the marine subsurface environment, suggesting that subsurface microbial communities predominantly assemble by selective survival of buried taxa (Jochum et al., 2017; Petro et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). Genetic diversification is limited from the sediment surface down to 2 mbsf, suggesting that microbial communities do not undergo adaptive evolution during burial (Starnawski et al., 2017). This lack of apparent evolution in the seabed is expected to be due to exceedingly long generation times which increase with sediment depth and age (Røy et al., 2012; Hoehler and Jørgensen, 2013; Lever et al., 2015a; Jørgensen and Marshall, 2016). Our estimates of microbial activity and biomass turnover show that the highest rates of activity, and likewise the fastest biomass turnover times, occur within the most heavily bioturbated surface layer (1–6 cmbsf) of Aarhus Bay sediments. As communities are buried below the bioturbation zone, biomass turnover times increase steadily, limiting the number of possible generations and likewise the potential for genetic diversification (Figure 6). Due to the lack of diversification even over longer depth intervals (Starnawski et al., 2017), it would seem that the greatest scope for adaptive evolution in the seabed occurs within the uppermost 6 cm of the sediment column of Aarhus Bay. The occurrence of relatively high activities and community generations within the bioturbation zone can be explained by macrofaunal reworking, which introduces labile organic matter from overlying water and the seafloor into deeper sediment layers (Kristensen and Holmer, 2001; Kristensen and Kostka, 2013; Chen et al., 2017). Bioirrigation of sediment during burrowing, feeding, and respiration can further stimulate organic matter degradation by introducing high potential electron acceptors into the sediment (Aller and Aller, 1998).

Much like diversification, the influence of dispersal, or the movement of microbial cells in space, may be higher within the bioturbation zone than the subsurface below. The potential for passive dispersal was especially pronounced within the uppermost 6 cm of the sediment, due to homogenizing mixing by macrofauna (Figure 1). Below the bioturbation zone, mixing decreases by at least two orders of magnitude. When conditions conducive to passive transport largely cease and community turnover is diminished, selection caused by fitness differences between taxa (Nemergut et al., 2013) is likely to take over as the predominant means of assembly.

Our high depth resolution datasets including a mapping of the extent of bioturbation provides direct evidence that stark changes in microbial abundance and community structure occur exactly at the bottom of the bioturbation zone (Figure 13). As discussed in detail below, our results thus confirm the hypothesis that this is where the subsurface microbial community assembles in the sediment. This can be explained by a shift in the selection regime—from fast growth and adaptation to dynamic conditions (including exposure to O2) within the mixed surface, to survival under energetic limitations in the subsurface below. This change causes an increase in the relative abundances of taxa which have been found to predominate in much deeper sediments, where rates of biomass turnover may approach hundreds to thousands of years (Parkes et al., 2000, 2014; Hoehler and Jørgensen, 2013; Jørgensen and Marshall, 2016). In agreement, selection has been previously implicated as a major driver of microbial community assembly in the subsurface, first in aquifers (Stegen et al., 2013), and more recently in marine sediments (Walsh et al., 2015; Jochum et al., 2017; Petro et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). Here we see that selection for taxa adapted to energetic limitations begins already centimeters below the sediment surface, as the community becomes buried underneath the more dynamic and energy-rich bioturbation zone. While the most marked difference in community composition occurs between the bioturbated samples and the subsurface below (7 cmbsf), there is still variability in the composition of samples from 7 to 50 cmbsf (Figure 3). These differences suggest that the deep community is not yet fully assembled, and that gradual population changes are likely to continue to occur throughout the entirety of the sediment column.

Influence of Geochemical Zonation

The distributions of abundant SRM lineages were indicative of a response to geochemical zonation, with major shifts in abundances occurring at the onset and end of the SR zone (Figure 5). The lineages that increased in absolute abundance within the SR zone maintained relatively constant abundances throughout the entirety of this region, with gene copy numbers dropping upon transition into the SMT. Apparent responses to geochemical zonation were especially pronounced for Uncultured Desulfobacteraceae lineage F and the Aarhus Bay lineage—both of which have been found previously to dominate the SRM community below the sediment surface and down into the methanogenesis zone (Jochum et al., 2017). The vertical stratification of SRM taxa has been demonstrated previously in coastal sediments (Sahm et al., 1999), biofilms (Ramsing et al., 1993), and marine Arctic sediments (Ravenschlag et al., 2000). These observations can be explained by an adaptation of certain lineages to specific geochemical conditions, allowing them to become dominant within a given depth interval (Jorgensen et al., 2012). The assumption that community dynamics are reflective of different ecological niches among the lineages is further supported by the measured SRR, which reach maximum rates at 3 cmbsf (Figure 1B). This delay, which is indicative of the competitive inhibition of dissimilatory sulfate reduction by Mn and Fe reductive processes (Canfield et al., 1993; Thamdrup et al., 1994), suggests that sulfate reduction is not the predominant terminal degradation process in the top 1–2 cm of the sediment. The geochemical succession of specialized populations is nicely illustrated by the dsrB sequence dataset, which shows that the dying off of dominant taxa within the uppermost 1–3 cm depth interval is followed by the rapid growth of lineages that subsequently take over as predominant members of the community (Figure 5).

While geochemical zonation thus has a hand in regulating some changes within the SRM community between depths, the overall trends for both SRM and total community appear decoupled from the geochemical zonation (Figure 3). This observation implies that the availability of energy and carbon, and not the concentration of electron acceptors such as sulfate, is the major driver for the microbial community, including also the terminal oxidizers.

Persisting Sediment Community

Extensive molecular surveys of marine sediments have identified a unique assemblage of microorganisms, which comprise a significant portion of the deep subsurface community at geographically distinct locations (Inagaki et al., 2003; Webster et al., 2004; Fry et al., 2008; Teske and Sørensen, 2008; Orcutt et al., 2011; Walsh et al., 2015). Many of these dominant taxa have been found to belong to a subset of “persister” microorganisms, whose relative abundances increase with sediment depth, irrespective of geochemical zonation (Petro et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). Common persisting lineages within the Bacteria include the Atribacteria (Dodsworth et al., 2013; Nobu et al., 2015) or Chloroflexi, while the archaeal community is dominated by members of the Bathyarchaeota (Meng et al., 2014) and Lokiarchaeota (Vetriani et al., 1999; Inagaki et al., 2003; Spang et al., 2015). While these taxa are commonly associated with deep marine sediments, here we see that their increase in relative abundance begins just centimeters below the seafloor, right under the bioturbation zone (Figure 3). The persistence of OTUs throughout the depth profile was demonstrated by tracing OTUs across depths in the sediment (Supplementary Figure S2). A small subset (<100) of OTUs were found to persist from the surface down to 50 cmbsf, where they came to comprise >40% of the total community. Similar patterns of OTU overlap have been observed between sediments and the overlying seawater, suggesting that deep subsurface communities are comprised of rare taxa that are deposited from the water column and persist throughout burial (Walsh et al., 2015). Our estimates of the absolute abundances of dominant OTUs demonstrate that select populations may increase in absolute abundance with sediment depth (Figure 4), contrary to the drop in cell numbers seen for the total community. This suggests that persisting populations may not simply survive, but also grow, within the energy limited subsurface. While striking, this observation is based on the relative abundances of OTU sequences combined with qPCR data of the total population, and should be verified using direct quantitative methods, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or OTU-specific qPCR, in future studies.

While the data presented here are only collected from a single sampling site, similar patterns of microbial diversity have been observed across broader sediment depths at numerous sites within Aarhus Bay (Jochum et al., 2017; Starnawski et al., 2017). By finely resolving population dynamics near the sediment surface at site M5, we see that a marked shift in the composition of the subsurface community occurs already centimeters below the seafloor, immediately below the bioturbation zone. The taxa which persist to the bottom of the sediment core are also found in low relative abundances at the surface, suggesting that populations present within the bioturbation zone act as a seed community for the subsurface below. Replicate cores sampled in 2017 and 2018 demonstrate that these depth-associated changes in the community are consistent across time. The geochemistry and rates of sulfate reduction were also stable across sampling dates, indicating a consistent drop in microbial activity between the bioturbation zone and the unmixed sediment below.

Collectively, these results suggest that the microbial communities present within the deep biosphere in Aarhus Bay sediments begin to assemble below the bottom of the bioturbation zone, where sediment mixing and energy availability are both diminished. These changes delineate the bioturbation zone from the unmixed sediment below, where environmental selection for populations adapted to energy limitations starts to shape the microbial communities which will come to predominate within the energy-starved deep subsurface biosphere in hundreds to thousands of years.

Author Contributions

BJ, HR, KK, and AS designed the research. CP, BZ, TF, HR, and KK performed the research. CP, BZ, LJ, PS, HR, and KK analyzed the data. CP wrote the manuscript with help from BZ, HR, KK, and AS.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the crew and scientists on board of RV Aurora for help with sampling as well as Britta Poulsen, Susanne Nielsen, and Jeanette Pedersen for significant technical assistance in the laboratory. We also thank Ian Marshall for providing us with a Python script used for our sequence analyses, and for helping, together with the participants of the course “Microbial Element Cycling and Population Ecology,” to retrieve microbial community data in 2017 and 2018.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was funded by the Danish National Research Foundation [n. DNRF104] and by an ERC Advanced Grant (#294200, 593 MICROENERGY) under the EU Seventh FP. Additional financial support for CP and BZ was provided by the International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) program in Marine Microbiology (MarMiC).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00758/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Aller R. C., Aller J. Y. (1998). The effect of biogenic irrigation intensity and solute exchange on diagenetic reaction rates in marine sediments. J. Mar. Res. 56 905–936. 10.1357/002224098321667413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biddle J. F., Lipp J. S., Lever M. A., Lloyd K. G., Sørensen K. B., Anderson R., et al. (2006). Heterotrophic archaea dominate sedimentary subsurface ecosystems off peru. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 3846–3851. 10.1073/pnas.0600035103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boudreau B. P. (1998). Mean mixed depth of sediments: the wherefore and the why. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43 524–526. 10.4319/lo.1998.43.3.0524 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun S., Morono Y., Becker K. W., Hinrichs K. U., Kjeldsen K. U., Jørgensen B. B., et al. (2016). Cellular content of biomolecules in sub-seafloor microbial communities. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 188 330–351. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cadillo-Quiroz H., Brauer S., Yashiro E., Sun C., Yavitt J., Zinder S. (2006). Vertical profiles of methanogenesis and methanogens in two contrasting acidic peatlands in central New York State. USA. Environ. Microbiol. 8 1428–1440. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01036.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Canfield D. E., Thamdrup B., Hansen J. W. (1993). The anaerobic degradation of organic matter in danish coastal sediments: iron reduction, manganese reduction, and sulfate reduction. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57 3867–3883. 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90340-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caporaso J. G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F. D., Costello E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high- throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7 335–336. 10.1038/nmeth0510-335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carr S. A., Orcutt B. N., Mandernack K. W., Spear J. R. (2015). Abundant Atribacteria in deep marine sediment from the Adélie Basin. Antarctica Front. Microbiol. 6:872 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen X., Andersen T. J., Morono Y., Inagaki F., Jørgensen B. B., Lever M. A. (2017). Bioturbation as a key driver behind the dominance of Bacteria over Archaea in near-surface sediment. Sci. Rep. 7:2400. 10.1038/s41598-017-02295-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Claesson M. J., Wang Q., Sullivan O. O., Greene-diniz R., Cole J. R., Ross R. P., et al. (2010). Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleid Acids Res. 38:e200. 10.1093/nar/gkq873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cutshall N. H., Larsen I. L., Olsen C. R. (1983). Direct analysis of 210Pb in sediment samples: self-absorption corrections. Nucl. Instruments Methods 206 309–312. 10.1016/0167-5087(83)91273-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. D’Hondt S., Wang G., Spivack A. J. (2014). “The underground economy (energetic constraints of subseafloor life),” in Earth and Life Processes Discovered From Subseafloor Environments eds Stein R., Larsen H.-C., Blackman D., Inagaki F. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.) 127–148. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dodsworth J. A., Blainey P. C., Murugapiran S. K., Swingley W. D., Ross C. A., Tringe S. G., et al. (2013). Single-cell and metagenomic analyses indicate a fermentative and saccharolytic lifestyle for members of the OP9 lineage. Nat. Commun. 4 1810–1854. 10.1038/ncomms2884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edgar R. C. (2013). UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10 996–998. 10.1038/nmeth.2604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Froehlich P. N., Klinkhammer G. P., Bender M. L., Luedtke N. A., Heath G. R., Cullen D., et al. (1979). Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 43 1075–1090. 10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fry J. C., Parkes R. J., Cragg B. A., Weightman A. J., Webster G. (2008). Prokaryotic biodiversity and activity in the deep subseafloor biosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 66 181–196. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00566.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Giovannelli D., Molari M., d’Errico G., Baldrighi E., Pala C., Manini E. (2013). Large-scale distribution and activity of prokaryotes in deep-sea surface sediments of the mediterranean sea and the adjacent atlantic ocean. PLoS One 8:e0072996. 10.1371/journal.pone.0072996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoehler T. M., Jørgensen B. B. (2013). Microbial life under extreme energy limitation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11 83–94. 10.1038/nrmicro2939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Inagaki F., Kubo Y., Bowles M. W., Heuer V. B., Ijiri A., Imachi H., et al. (2015). Supplementary – exploring deep microbial life in coal-bearing sediment down to ∼2.5 km below the ocean floor. Science 349 420–424. 10.1126/science.aaa6882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Inagaki F., Suzuki M., Takai K., Oida H., Sakamoto T., Aoki K., et al. (2003). Microbial communities associated with geological horizons in coastal subseafloor sediments from the sea of okhotsk microbial communities associated with geological horizons in coastal subseafloor sediments from the sea of Okhotsk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 7224–7235. 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jochum L. M., Chen X., Lever M. A., Loy A., Jørgensen B. B., Schramm A., et al. (2017). Depth distribution and assembly of sulfate-reducing microbial communities in marine sediments of Aarhus Bay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83:e1547-17. 10.1128/AEM.01547-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jørgensen B. B. (1978). Comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine-sediments. 1. Measurement with radiotracer techniques. Geomicrobiol. J. 1 11–27. 10.1080/01490457809377721 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jørgensen B. B. (1982). Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296 643–645. 10.1038/296643a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jørgensen B. B., Marshall I. P. G. (2016). Slow microbial life in the seabed. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8 311–332. 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jorgensen S. L., Hannisdal B., Lanzén A., Baumberger T., Flesland K. (2012). Correlating microbial community pro fi les with geochemical data in highly strati fi ed sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 16764–16765. 10.1594/PANGAEA.786687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kallmeyer J., Ferdelman T. G., Weber A., Fossing H., Jørgensen B. B. (2004). A cold chromium distillation procedure for radiolabeled sulfide applied to sulfate reduction measurements. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2 171–180. 10.4319/lom.2004.2.171 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kallmeyer J., Pockalny R., Ram R., Smith D. C., D’Hondt S. (2012). Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subsea fl oor sediment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 16213–16216. 10.1073/pnas.1203849109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kjeldsen K. U., Loy A., Jakobsen T. F., Thomsen T. R., Wagner M., Ingvorsen K. (2007). Diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria from an extreme hypersaline sediment, Great Salt Lake (Utah). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 60 287–298. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00288.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Klindworth A., Pruesse E., Schweer T., Peplies J., Quast C., Horn M., et al. (2013). Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 1–11. 10.1093/nar/gks808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Knittel K., Boetius A. (2009). Anaerobic oxidation of methane: progress with an unknown process. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63 311–334. 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kristensen E., Holmer M. (2001). Decomposition of plant materials in marine sediment exposed to different electron acceptors (O2, NO3 and SO42), with emphasis on substrate origin, degradation kinetics, and the role of bioturbation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65 419–433. 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00532-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kristensen E., Kostka J. E. (2013). Macrofaunal burrows and irrigation in marine sediment: microbiological and biogeochemical interactions. Interact. Between Macro Microorg. Mar. Sediments 60 125–157. 10.1029/CE060p0125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kristensen E., Penha-Lopes G., Delefosse M., Valdemarsen T., Quintana C. O., Banta G. T. (2012). What is bioturbation? the need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 446 285–302. 10.3354/meps09506 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kubo K., Lloyd K. G., Biddle J. F., Amann R., Teske A., Knittel K. (2012). Archaea of the miscellaneous crenarchaeotal group are abundant, diverse and widespread in marine sediments. ISME J. 6 1949–1965. 10.1038/ismej.2012.37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Langerhuus A. T., Røy H., Lever M. A., Morono Y., Inagaki F., Jørgensen B. B., et al. (2012). Endospore abundance and d: L-amino acid modeling of bacterial turnover in holocene marine sediment (Aarhus Bay). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 99 87–99. 10.1016/j.gca.2012.09.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lavergne C., Beaugeard L., Dupuy C., Courties C., Agogué H. (2014). An efficient and rapid method for the enumeration of heterotrophic prokaryotes in coastal sediments by flow cytometry. J. Microbiol. Methods 105 31–38. 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Leloup J., Loy A., Knab N. J., Borowski C., Wagner M., Jørgensen B. B. (2007). Diversity and abundance of sulfate-reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 9 131–142. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01122.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lever M. A. (2013). Functional gene surveys from ocean drilling expeditions - a review and perspective. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 84 1–23. 10.1111/1574-6941.12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lever M. A., Rogers K. L., Lloyd K. G., Overmann J., Schink B., Thauer R. K., et al. (2015a). Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39 688–728. 10.1093/femsre/fuv020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lever M. A., Torti A., Eickenbusch P., Michaud A. B., Šantl-Temkiv T., Jørgensen B. B. (2015b). A modular method for the extraction of DNA and RNA, and the separation of DNA pools from diverse environmental sample types. Front. Microbiol. 6:476. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lipp J. S., Morono Y., Inagaki F., Hinrichs K.-U. (2008). Significant contribution of Archaea to extant biomass in marine subsurface sediments. Nature 454 991–994. 10.1038/nature07174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lomstein B. A., Langerhuus A. T., D’Hondt S., Jørgensen B. B., Spivack A. J. (2012). Endospore abundance, microbial growth and necromass turnover in deep sub-seafloor sediment. Nature 484 101–104. 10.1038/nature10905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McMurdie P. J., Holmes S. (2013). Phyloseq: an r package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e0061217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Meng J., Xu J., Qin D., He Y., Xiao X., Wang F. (2014). Genetic and functional properties of uncultivated MCG archaea assessed by metagenome and gene expression analyses. ISME J. 8 650–659. 10.1038/ismej.2013.174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Meysman F. J. R., Middelburg J. J., Heip C. H. R. (2006). Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin’s last idea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 688–695. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Middelburg J. J. (1989). A simple rate model for organic matter decomposition in marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53 1577–1581. 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90239-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moros M., Andersen T. J., Schulz-Bull D., Häusler K., Bunke D., Snowball I., et al. (2017). Towards an event stratigraphy for Baltic Sea sediments deposited since AD 1900: approaches and challenges. Boreas 46 129–142. 10.1111/bor.12193 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Müller A. L., Kjeldsen K. U., Rattei T., Pester M., Loy A. (2014). Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases. ISME J. 9 1152–1165. 10.1038/ismej.2014.208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nemergut D. R., Schmidt S. K., Fukami T., Neill S. P. O., Bilinski T. M., Stanish L. F., et al. (2013). Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77 342–356. 10.1128/MMBR.00051-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nobu M. K., Dodsworth J. A., Murugapiran S. K., Rinke C., Gies E. A., Webster G., et al. (2015). Phylogeny and physiology of candidate phylum ‘Atribacteria’ (OP9/JS1) inferred from cultivation-independent genomics. ISME J. 10 273–286. 10.1038/ismej.2015.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ohkuma M., Kudo T. (1998). Phylogenetic analysis of the symbiotic intestinal microfora of the termite Cryptotermes domesticus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 164 389–395. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13114.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., Mcglinn D., et al. (2017). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Packag. Version 2.4-4. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed September 6 2017). [Google Scholar]
  53. Orcutt B. N., Sylvan J. B., Knab N. J., Edwards K. J. (2011). Microbial ecology of the dark ocean above, at, and below the seafloor. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75 361–422. 10.1128/MMBR.00039-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Parkes R. J., Cragg B., Roussel E., Webster G., Weightman A., Sass H. (2014). A review of prokaryotic populations and processes in sub-seafloor sediments, including biosphere: geosphere interactions. Mar. Geol. 352 409–425. 10.1016/j.margeo.2014.02.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Parkes R. J., Cragg B. A., Wellsbury P. (2000). Recent studies on bacterial populations and processes in subseafloor sediments: a review. Hydrogeol. J. 8 11–28. 10.1007/PL00010971 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Petro C., Starnawski P., Schramm A., Kjeldsen K. U. (2017). Microbial community assembly in marine sediments. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 79 177–195. 10.3354/ame01826 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ramsing N. B., Kuhl M., Jørgensen B. B. (1993). Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probes and microelectrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 3840–3849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ravenschlag K., Sahm K., Knoblauch C., Jørgensen B., Amann R., Jørgensen B. O. B. (2000). Community structure, cellular rRNA content, and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in marine arctic sediments community structure, cellular rRNA content, and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in marine arctic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 3592–3602. 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3592-3602.2000.Updated [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Røy H., Kallmeyer J., Adhikari R. R., Pockalny R., Jorgensen B. B., D’Hondt S. (2012). Aerobic microbial respiration in 86-million-year-old deep-sea red clay. Science 336 922–925. 10.1126/science.1219424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Røy H., Weber H. S., Tarpgaard I. H., Ferdelman T. G., Jørgensen B. B. (2014). Determination of dissimilatory sulfate reduction rates in marine sediment via radioactive 35 S tracer. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 12 196–211. 10.4319/lom.2014.12.196 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sahm K., Macgregor B. J., Jørgensen B. B., Stahl D. A. (1999). Sulphate reduction and vertical distribution of sulphate-reducing bacteria quantified by rRNA slot-blot hybridization in a coastal marine sediment. Environ. Microbiol. 1 65–74. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00007.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Spang A., Saw J. H., Jørgensen S. L., Zaremba-niedzwiedzka K., Martijn J., Lind A. E., et al. (2015). Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521 173–179. 10.1038/nature14447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Starnawski P., Bataillon T., Ettema T. J. G., Jochum L. M., Schreiber L., Chen X., et al. (2017). Microbial community assembly and evolution in subseafloor sediment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 2940–2945. 10.1073/pnas.1614190114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Stegen J. C., Lin X., Fredrickson J. K., Chen X., Kennedy D. W., Murray C. J., et al. (2013). Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 7 2069–2079. 10.1038/ismej.2013.93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stoddard S. F., Smith B. J., Hein R., Roller B. R. K., Schmidt T. M. (2015). rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 D593–D598. 10.1093/nar/gku1201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Teal L. R., Bulling M. T., Parker E. R., Solan M. (2008). Global patterns of bioturbation intensity and mixed depth of marine soft sediments. Aquat. Biol. 2 207–218. 10.3354/ab00052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Teske A., Sørensen K. B. (2008). Uncultured archaea in deep marine subsurface sediments: have we caught them all? ISME J. 2 3–18. 10.1038/ismej.2007.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Teske A. P. (2006). Microbial communities of deep marine subsurface sediments: molecular and cultivation surveys. Geomicrobiol. J. 23 357–368. 10.1080/01490450600875613 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Thamdrup B., Fossing H., Jørgensen B. B. (1994). Manganese, iron, and sulfur cycling in a coastal marine sediment, Aarhus Bay, Denmark. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58 5115–5129. 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90298-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Thomsen T., Finster K., Ramsing N. B. (2001). Biogeochemical and molecular signatures of anaerobic methane oxidation in a marine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67 1646–1656. 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Vetriani C., Jannasch H. W., Gregor B. J. M., Stahl D. A., Reysenbach A.-L. (1999). Population structure and phylogenetic characterization of marine benthic archaea in deep-sea sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 4375–4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wagner M., Loy A., Klein M., Lee N., Ramsing N. B., Stahl D. A., et al. (2005). Functional marker genes for identification of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes. Methods Enzymol. 397 469–489. 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)97029-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Walsh E. A., Kirkpatrick J. B., Rutherford S. D., Smith D. C., Sogin M., D’Hondt S. (2015). Bacterial diversity and community composition from seasurface to subseafloor. ISME J. 10 979–989. 10.1038/ismej.2015.175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang Y., Qian P. Y. (2009). Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS One 4:e0007401. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Webster G., Parkes R. J., Fry J. C., Weightman J., Weightman A. J. (2004). Widespread occurrence of a novel division of bacteria identified by 16S rRNA gene sequences originally found in deep marine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:156. 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K., Caceres E., Saw J., Bäckström D., Juzokaite L., Vancaester E., et al. (2017). Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature 541 353–358. 10.1038/nature21031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES