Abstract
Objectives
There is an increasing prevalence of hypothyroidism and there is a growing body of meta-analyses (MAs) on the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases. However, the methodological quality of the MAs significantly varies. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate and summarise data on the methodological quality of MAs on the associations between hypothyroidism and other diseases using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale, providing suggestions for clinical decision-making processes.
Design
To assess the methodological quality of MAs using the AMSTAR scale.
Data sources
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, web of science and Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database.
Eligibility criteria
We included MAs that had assessed the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases in humans and that had full texts regardless of the publication status. No restriction applied on language or date.
Data extraction and synthesis
Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of all searched literature to acquire potentially eligible publications. The full texts of possible eligible publications were downloaded and assessed. Inconsistent comments were resolved through discussions with a third reviewer.
Results
52 studies were included. The average AMSTAR score of the included articles was 8.6 (range: 5–10), and those of English and Chinese MAs were 8.8 and 7.0, respectively. A total of 52 MAs were evaluated, and 19 (36.5%) and 33 (63.5%) of these MAs were of moderate and high quality, respectively. None of the MAs were of low quality. Only two MAs had an a priori design. Items 3, 5 and 9 had the highest compliance (50/52, 96.2%), and aside from item 1, items 7 and 8 had the lowest compliance (33/52,63.5%). According to the results of these MAs, hypothyroidism was significantly associated with cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, neuropsychiatric disorders, breast cancer and pregnancy outcome.
Conclusions
The methodological quality of the included MAs on the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases was moderate to high. MAs with high qualities confirmed that hypothyroidism was significantly associated with cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, preterm birth and neonatal outcomes. Consideration of scientific quality when formulating conclusions should be made explicit and more attention should be paid to improving the methodological quality of MAs, and increasing their applicability for clinical decision-making.
Keywords: hypothyroidism, amstar, methodological quality, meta-analysis
Strengths and limitations of this study.
This study first assessed the methodological quality of meta-analyses (MAs) on the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases.
We used the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale to assess the methodological quality of MAs.
The included MAs were randomly selected without restriction and followed rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria.
One limitation of this study is that the AMSTAR appraisal process was difficult to implement when the reporting quality was poor.
We tried our best to make a conversion between OR and relative ratio by extracting raw data from MAs, but some data were not obtained.
Introduction
Hypothyroidism is defined as an increase in serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, with decreased (overt hypothyroidism [OH]) or normal (subclinical hypothyroidism [SCH]) serum thyroid hormone levels.1 Epidemiological data have indicated that the prevalence of hypothyroidism in the general population ranged from 4.6% to 23.5%,2 3 and is predominant in elderly individuals and women.4 OH is associated with weight gain, dyslipidaemia and hypertension, which are confounders of atherosclerosis and subsequently causes coronary heart disease (CHD).5 Prospective cohort studies have shown that SCH can increase the risk of heart failure (HF),6CHD events and mortality.7 Recently, Canpolat et al 8 have revealed that impaired gastric motility and resultant upper gastrointestinal symptoms were observed in individuals with SCH, and thyroid hormone replacement was beneficial in improving symptoms and changes in clinical indicators. In addition, studies on the effects of SCH on cognitive impairment,9 10 metabolic syndrome (MetS)11 12 and fractures13 14 have shown conflicting results.
Meta-analyses (MAs) have been becoming a popular and powerful type of evidence, and they have several advantages, including overcoming the limitation of small sample sizes and pooling individual study results to generate a single best estimate.15 High-quality MAs can provide guideline developers better evidence to formulate guidelines, show the advantages and disadvantages of an intervention and guide health professionals, clinicians and stakeholders with the best interventions for targeted patients.16 The Cochrane Collaboration is an international network of healthcare professionals who prepare and regularly update systematic reviews (SRs), and Cochrane reviews were generally of high quality.15 In 2016, 73 reviews, which were completed by 11 Cochrane Review Groups, were used in 14 of 18 (78%) WHO guidelines.17 By contrast, in MAs, a poor methodology can negatively affect decision-making processes.15 A great number of MAs that evaluate the role of hypothyroidism in the development and progression of other diseases have been published. However, the methodological quality of these MAs had not been evaluated, and the conclusions of these MAs were debatable.
Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), which was developed based on previous tools, empirical evidence and expert consensus and can be applied to SRs/MAs of both randomised controlled and non-randomised studies, is the most recent, reliable and valid tool for evaluating MAs.18 19 Gagnier et al have assessed the methodological quality of SRs and MAs in the top five orthopaedic journals using AMSTAR. The included articles did not conform to the accepted standards of quality. Moreover, the validity of the published SRs is questionable, and their contribution to clinical decision-making is suboptimal.19 Remschmidt et al have used the AMSTAR to investigate the methodological quality of the SRs and MAs on influenza vaccination and identify influencing factors.20 Tian et al compared the methodological quality of SRs from China and the USA using the AMSTAR scale and concluded that the overall methodological quality of the SRs from China was similar to that from the USA.21
Thus, this study aimed to evaluate and summarise data on the methodological quality of MAs on the associations between hypothyroidism and other diseases using the AMSTAR scale, providing suggestions for clinical decision-making processes.
Materials and methods
Data sources and study selection
We performed a systematic literature search from inception to 1 April 2018 in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database to identify MAs on the associations between hypothyroidism and other diseases. The combinations of the following keywords were used in the search strategy: ‘thyroid’, ‘hypothyroidism’, ‘subclinical hypothyroidism’ and ‘meta-analysis’. Free-text words and MeSH terms were entered depending on the characteristics of the database. Search strategy is shown in online supplementary appendix 1. To minimise the risk of missing relevant literature, reference lists from retrieved articles were hand screened for additional applicable studies. We did not apply any restriction to language or date.
bmjopen-2018-024111supp001.pdf (85.8KB, pdf)
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
We included MAs that fulfilled the following criteria: (1) MAs that assessed the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases in humans (2) and that had full texts regardless of publication status, (3) studies in abstract form or meeting reports after the authors were contacted and full texts were obtained within a month, (4) recent studies with the same topic from the same author and (5) duplicate copies of MAs in both Chinese and English, including English articles.
Study selection
Two reviewers (FS and YQ) independently screened the titles and abstracts of all searched literature to acquire potentially eligible publications. The full texts of possible eligible publications were downloaded and assessed. Inconsistent comments were resolved through discussions with a third reviewer (LT).
Assessment of methodological quality of the included MAs
Two authors (FS and YQ) independently assessed the methodological quality of the included MAs. The AMSTAR scale, which uses an 11-item questionnaire, was used in this study to assess the methodological quality of MAs because it is the most recent, reliable and valid tool.22 The items in the AMSTAR scale are the following: an a priori design, duplicate study selection and data extraction, comprehensive literature search, use of the status of publication as an inclusion criteria, a list of included and excluded studies, characteristics of included studies, documented assessment of the scientific quality of the included studies, appropriate use of the scientific quality in forming conclusions, appropriate use of methods to combine the findings of studies, assessment of the likelihood of publication bias and documentation of potential conflicts of interest. The items may be answered with a ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘can’t answer’ or ‘not applicable’. One point was provided when the answer was ‘Yes’; otherwise, no score was provided. The AMSTAR quality score was the summation of the number of ‘yes’. According to the number of criteria met, the included articles were ranked into three levels: ‘high’ (range: 9–11), ‘moderate’ (range: 5–8) and ‘low’ (range: 0–4).
Agreement of assessment
To obtain more reliable data on the methodological quality of MAs, the agreement of the methodological quality assessment results between the two independent reviewers (FS and YQ) was investigated through a plot test. In this process, 10 MAs were selected from the included studies. The two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of these MAs using the AMSTAR scale. We calculated the agreement proportion and Cohen’s kappa (k) value for each of the 11 AMSTAR items. A k value between 0.81 and 1.00 indicated a good agreement.23 During the first assessment, the agreement for items 7 and 8 between the two reviewers were poor (0.67 and 0.70, respectively), and good agreement was obtained after a discussion between the reviewers.
Patient involvement
Given its methodological focus, we did not evaluate patient-related outcomes. Therefore, we also chose not to involve patients’ input in its design. However, the aim of this study is to indirectly benefit the welfare of patients by promoting the development of high-quality MAs.
Results
Study identification
Initially, we yielded 3107 potentially relevant articles by searching the five electronic databases and other sources. After identifying duplications and screening the titles and abstracts, 3039 articles were excluded. We attempted to find the full texts of the remaining 68 articles for intensive reading. Of these, 12 articles that met the criteria were published as abstracts. Moreover, we aimed to obtain the full texts by contacting the authors. However, the authors did not respond within a month. Thus, these articles were excluded. Two Chinese articles24 25 were excluded from publishing in both Chinese and English languages. In addition, two MAs26 27 were excluded from the old version. Thus, we only included the recently updated ones.28 Finally, 52 eligible MAs were included in our analysis. The flowchart of the review selection process is presented in figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the review search and identification.
Characteristics of the included MAs
Among the 52 included eligible MAs, 4628–73 (46/52, 88.5%) were published in English, and the rest74–79 (6/52, 11.5%) were published in Chinese. The 52 included MAs contained 685 studies, with an average of 13.2 (range: 3–39) studies per article. The publication years of the included articles ranged from 2008 to 2018, and 82.7% of the articles were published in the last 5 years. The characteristics of the 52 MAs are shown in online supplementary appendix 2.
bmjopen-2018-024111supp002.pdf (297.1KB, pdf)
Ten39 40 43 49 57 58 65 68–70 MAs were about the associations between OH and other diseases, and 3528–36 38 42 44–47 50–56 59–64 66 67 75–79 MAs have shown the associations between SCH and other diseases. Seven37 41 48 71–74MAs have investigated the effects of both OH and SCH on other diseases. Except for the general population, pregnant women with hypothyroidism were also included in the target groups of the included MAs.35 37 40 41 48 51 61 64 67 71 74 The characteristics of these MAs are shown in table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of MAs
| Characteristics of MAs | No of MAs |
| Target groups | |
| General population with OH or SCH | 40 |
| Pregnant women with OH or SCH | 12 |
| Associated diseases | |
| Cardiovascular events | 7 |
| Preterm birth | 6 |
| Fracture | 5 |
| Carotid intima-media thickness | 4 |
| Neonatal outcomes | 4 |
| Cognitive function | 3 |
| Intelligence development of the offspring | 3 |
| Blood pressure | 3 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 2 |
| Serum lipid level | 2 |
| Breast cancer | 2 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 2 |
| Glaucoma | 2 |
| Diabetes complications | 2 |
| Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease | 2 |
| Intrauterine growth restriction | 2 |
| Left ventricular diastolic function | 1 |
| Stroke | 1 |
| Plasma homocysteine status | 1 |
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | 1 |
| Obstructive sleep apnoea | 1 |
| Gestational diabetes | 1 |
| Metabolic and hormonal profile | 1 |
| Miscarriage | 1 |
| Language | |
| English | 46 |
| Chinese | 6 |
| Publication year | |
| 2008–2010 | 3 |
| 2011–2013 | 6 |
| 2014–2016 | 27 |
| 2017–2018 | 16 |
| Impact factor | |
| <3.5 | 24 |
| ≥3.5 | 20 |
OH, overt hypothyroidism; MAs, meta-analyses; SCH, subclinical hypothyroidism
Methodological quality of the included MAs
The average AMSTAR score of the included articles was 8.6 (range: 5–10), and those of English and Chinese MAs were 8.8 and 7.0, respectively. A total of 52 MAs were evaluated, and 19 (36.5%) and 33 (63.5%) of these MAs were of moderate and high quality. None of the MAs was of low quality. The numbers and percentages of each response (‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘can’t answer’ and ‘not applicable’) among the MAs for each AMSTAR item are shown in table 2. Two MAs had an a priori design. Items 3, 5 and 9 had the highest compliance (50/52, 96.2%), and aside from item 1, items on whether the scientific quality of the included studies was assessed and documented and whether the scientific quality of the included studies has been used appropriately in formulating conclusions had the lowest compliance 35/52 (67.3%). For item 7, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, the most commonly used tool for observational studies, was used.
Table 2.
Methodological quality of the included MAs
| Items | Y, n (%) | N, n (%) | CA, n (%) | NA, n (%) |
| 1. Was an ‘a priori’ design provided? | 2 (3.8) | 50 (96.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 2. Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction? | 44 (84.6) | 1 (1.9) | 7 (13.5) | 0 (0) |
| 3. Was a comprehensive literature search performed? | 51 (98.1) | 1 (1.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 4. Was the status of publication used as an inclusion criterion? | 44 (84.6) | 8 (15.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 5. Was a list of studies provided? | 51 (98.1) | 1 (1.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 6. Were the characteristics of the included studies provided? | 50 (96.2) | 2 (3.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 7. Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? | 38 (73.1) | 14 (26.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 8. Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? | 35 (67.3) | 17 (32.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 9. Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate? | 50 (96.2) | 2 (3.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 10. Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? | 44 (84.6) | 8 (15.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 11. Was the conflict of interest stated? | 40 (76.9) | 12 (23.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Y, yes; N, no; CA, cannot answer; NA, not applicable.
Association between hypothyroidism and other diseases
Conclusions and the number of MAs, case–control (CC)/cohort (CO)/cross-sectional (CS) studies and patients, and average AMSTAR score about the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases are shown in tables 3 and 4.
Table 3.
Conclusions, the number of MAs, average CC/CO/CS studies and patients and average AMSTAR score about the association between OH and other diseases
| Conclusions | No of included MAs | Average CC/CO/CS studies included | Average patients included | Average AMSTAR score |
| Plasma homocysteine levels were found to be significantly higher in patients with OH58 | 1 | 2/3/0 | 586 | 10 |
| There is a significant association between OH and tunnel syndrome49 | 1 | 3/1/0 | 71 133 | 7 |
| OH is significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients with HF43 | 1 | 0/10/0 | 19 354 | 10 |
| OH is significantly associated with increased cardiac death and/or hospitalisation in patients with HF43 | 1 | 0/10/0 | 21 858 | 10 |
| OH is significantly associated with a risk factor for gestational diabetes37 | 1 | 0/3/0 | 225 427 | 7 |
| OH is significantly associated with the severity of obstructive sleep apnea57 | 1 | 0/8/4 | 1615 | 7 |
| OH is significantly associated with breast cancer39 | 1 | 1/2/3 | 6175 | 6 |
| Maternal OH is significantly associated with the occurrence of preterm birth40 41 48 74 | 4 | 0.25/7.5/0.25 | 1 152 475 | 8.75 |
| Mothers with hypothyroidism during pregnancy have a significant increased tendency to give birth to children with higher birth weight40 | 1 | 0/9/0 | 1 627 521 | 8 |
| Mothers with hypothyroidism during pregnancy have a significant increased tendency to give birth to children with lower birth weight40 | 1 | 0/5/0 | 23 879 | 8 |
| Maternal OH shows a significant trend of reduced risk of large for gestational age40 | 1 | 0/3/0 | 1 612 705 | 8 |
| No evidence shows a significant relationship between maternal OH and small for gestational age40 | 1 | 0/4/0 | 1 613 846 | 8 |
| Hypothyroidism has an increased risk of developing glaucoma68 | 1 | 2/5/4 | 381 695 | 9 |
| There seems to be an association between hypothyroidism and glaucoma69 | 1 | 4/2/7 | 173 763 | 9 |
| Hypothyroidism is a risk factor for CHD and cardiac mortality70 | 1 | 0/13/0 | 615 596 | 9 |
| No significant association between NAFLD and OH72 | 1 | 1/1/4 | 27 070 | 10 |
| OH is at higher risk for NAFLD than euthyroid subjects73 | 1 | 4/2/4 | 42 143 | 10 |
| Hypothyroidism is not related to the risk for breast cancer65 | 1 | 12/0/0 | 24 571 | 9 |
AMSTAR, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews; CC/CO/CS; case–control/cohort/cross-sectional; CHD, coronary heart disease; HF, heart failure; MAs, meta-analyses; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; OH, overt hypothyroidism.
Table 4.
Conclusions, the number of MAs, average CC/CO/CS studies and patients and average AMSTAR score about the association between SCH and other diseases
| Conclusions | No of included MAs | Average CC/CO/CS studies included | Average patients included | Average AMSTAR score |
| Plasma homocysteine levels were not found to be significantly higher in patients with SCH58 | 1 | 3/5/0 | 926 | 10.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with fractures30 52 54 | 3 | 0/8/0 | 128 667 | 9.7 |
| SCH was associated with increased risk of any location of fractures, hip fractures and forearm fractures60 | 1 | 0/13/0 | 62 490 | 10 |
| No evidence which could prove a definite association between SCH and the risk of fracture79 | 1 | 0/6/0 | 289 575 | 7 |
| Serum TC, LDL-C and TG levels were significantly increased in patients with SCH compared with euthyroidism individuals. No significant difference was observed for serum HDL-C36 42 | 2 | 5/0/7 | 22 767 | 9.00 |
| SCH is associated with a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose36 | 1 | 3/0/1 | 3507 | 9.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with BMI36 | 1 | 7/0/1 | 3971 | 9.00 |
| SCH was associated with a significant increase in SBP31 36 56 | 3 | 1.7/2/7 | 23 485 | 8.00 |
| SCH was associated with a significant increase in DBP31 | 1 | 0/0/6 | 17 323 | 8.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with increased DBP36 56 | 2 | 1.7/1.7/5 | 25 810 | 8.00 |
| SCH is associated with a significant increase in C-IMT36 59 66 75 | 4 | 6.75/3.5/0.5 | 2420 | 8.75 |
| SCH has a significant association with arterial wall thickening and stiffening and endothelial dysfunction and increased risk of cardiovascular events59 | 1 | 27/0/0 | 1931 | 9 |
| SCH is significantly associated with an increased risk for CHD50 63 | 2 | 0/6.5/1 | 8528 | 7.5 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with an increased risk for CHD28 44 77 | 0/9.3/0 | 18 525 | 7.30 | |
| SCH is significantly associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality50 63 | 2 | 0/3.5/0.5 | 6525 | 7.5 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality28 44 | 2 | 0/10/0 | 33 444 | 8.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality28 44 50 | 3 | 0/6.3/0.3 | 24 853 | 7.00 |
| SCH is significantly associated with MetS as defined by the IDF Criteria55 | 1 | 0/0/2 | 7258 | 10.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with MetS as defined by the NCEP-ATP III Criteria34 55 | 2 | 2/0/5 | 24 717 | 10.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with MetS as defined by the Chinese Criteria55 | 1 | 0/0/1 | 1399 | 10.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with MetS as defined by the Japanese Criteria55 | 1 | 0/0/2 | 10 350 | 10.00 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with cognitive impairment29 45 47 | 3 | 0/8.3/4.3 | 16 833 | 9.33 |
| SCH patients had significantly worse parameters of left ventricular diastolic function than euthyroid subjects aged <60 years33 | 1 | 0/0/14 | 675 | 7.00 |
| SCH is significantly associated with a risk factor for gestational diabetes37 | 1 | 0/6/0 | 63 567 | 7 |
| SCH can significantly increase the risk of diabetic retinopathy in T2DM patients38 53 | 2 | 0/8.5/0.5 | 4101 | 9.5 |
| SCH can significantly increase the risk of diabetic nephropathy in T2DM patients38 62 | 2 | 6/0/1.5 | 2653 | 8.5 |
| SCH can significantly increase the risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in T2DM patients38 | 1 | 3/0/0 | 1710 | 10 |
| SCH can significantly increase the risk of peripheral arterial disease in T2DM patients38 | 1 | 4/0/0 | 801 | 10 |
| SCH is not significantly associated with coronary heart disease in T2DM patients38 | 1 | 7/0/0 | 1896 | 10 |
| SCH is a significant risk factor of chronic kidney disease in T2DM patients78 | 1 | 4/0/2 | 38 284 | 6 |
| No significant correlation was found between SCH and stroke32 | 1 | 0/5/0 | 10 118 | 10 |
| SCH does not influence the hormonal profile of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. But it results in mild metabolic abnormalities in a short-term setting66 | 1 | 0/12/0 | 2341 | 10 |
| Maternal SCH is not significantly associated with the occurrence of preterm birth48 | 1 | 0/10/0 | 48 684 | 8 |
| Maternal SCH significantly increases the risk of preterm birth41 59 64 71 | 4 | 0/14.1/0 | 110 951 | 9.3 |
| Maternal SCH is significantly associated with the risk for intrauterine growth restriction51 64 | 2 | 0/5/0 | 12 558 | 8.5 |
| Maternal SCH has a significant adverse affect on the intelligence of offspring35 46 76 | 3 | 1/0/37 | 303 360 | 8.3 |
| SCH patients have a higher prevalence of miscarriage67 | 1 | 0/3/0 | 6036 | 9 |
| Children of women with SCH were found have a significant lower mean motor scores than those of euthyroidism35 | 1 | 0/1/0 | 160 | 10 |
| No significant association was found between NAFLD and SCH72 | 1 | 0/1/4 | 26 454 | 10 |
AMSTAR, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews; BMI, body mass index; CC/CO/CS, case–control/cohort/cross-sectional; CHD, coronary heart disease; C-IMT, carotid intima-media thickness; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MAs, meta-analyses; MetS, metabolic syndrome; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NCEP-ATP III, National Cholesterol Education Programme’s Adult Treatment Panel III; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SCH, subclinical hypothyroidism; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total triglyceride; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
According to the AMSTAR score and the number of patients included in these MAs, the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases was summarised by showing the relative ratio (RR)/OR/HR/weighted mean difference/standardised mean difference (tables 5 and 6). Regarding the association between SCH and other diseases, diabetic peripheral neuropathy had the highest RR value (2.27) and OR value (1.87). The association between OH and breast cancer had the highest OR (1.79). However, this value is not considered statistically significant.
Table 5.
Association between SCH/OH and other diseases (showed by RR/HR/OR)
| Author and year | Diseases | Sample size | No of included CC/CO/CS studies | RR/HR | OR | AMSTAR score |
| Subclinical hypothyroidism | ||||||
| Yan et al (2016)54 | Fractures | 314 146 | 0/5/0 | 1.20 (0.70, 2.04) | 9 | |
| Han et al (2015)38 | DN | 4761 | 7/0/3 | 1.35 (1.26, 1.44)* | 1.74 (1.34, 2.28) | 10 |
| DR | 4572 | 9/0/1 | 1.08 (0.99, 1.18)* | 1.42 (1.21, 1.67) | ||
| PAD | 801 | 4/0/0 | 1.33 (1.10, 1.60)* | 1.85 (1.35, 2.54) | ||
| CHD | 1896 | 7/0/0 | 1.29 (1.09, 1.52)* | 1.59 (0.92, 2.76) | ||
| DPN | 1710 | 3/0/0 | 2.27 (1.98, 2.60)* | 1.87 (1.06, 3.28) | ||
| Rodondi et al (2010)28 | CHD | 25 977 | 0/7/0 | 1.26 (1.16, 1.38)* | 1.33 (1.19, 1.49)* | 9 |
| CHD mortality | 54 301 | 0/10/0 | 1.63 (1.42, 1.87)* | 1.67 (1.45, 1.94)* | ||
| Total mortality | 55 287 | 0/11/0 | 1.57 (1.48, 1.67)* | 1.78 (1.64, 1.92)* | ||
| Ning et al (2015)43 | All-cause mortality of heart failure patients | 19 354 | 0/10/0 | 1.44 (1.29, 1.61) | 10 | |
| Cardiac death and/or hospitalisation of heart failure patients | 21 858 | 0/10/0 | 1.37 (1.22, 1.55) | |||
| Rieben et al (2016)47 | Dementia | 7401 | 0/6/0 | 1.14 (0.84, 1.55) | 1.08 (0.78, 1.51)* | 10 |
| Eftekharzadeh et al (2016)34 | Metabolic syndrome | 34 517 | 1/1/7 | 1.13 (0.95, 1.34) | 10 | |
| Chaker et al (2014)32 | Stroke | 10 118 | 0/5/0 | 1.08 (0.87, 1.34)† | 10 | |
| Zhou et al (2016)78 | CKD in diabetes patients | 38 284 | 4/0/2 | 1.81 (1.43, 2.29) | 6 | |
| Hou et al (2016)40 | Low birth weight | 23 879 | 0/5/0 | 1.31 (1.00, 1.72) | 1.11 (0.84, 1.48)* | 8 |
| SGA | 1 613 846 | 0/4/0 | 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) | |||
| LGA | 1 612 705 | 0/3/0 | 1.17 (0.99, 1.38) | 0.99 (0.84, 1.17)* | ||
| Li et al (2016)41 | Preterm birth | 455 716 | 0/14/1 | 1.17 (1.07, 1.28)* | 1.25 (1.04, 1.51) | 10 |
| Tong et al (2016)51 | IGR | 16 157 | 0/7/0 | 2.05 (1.43, 2.94)* | 1.54 (1.06, 2.25) | 8 |
| Gong et al (2016)37 | Gestational diabetes | 225 427 | 0/3/0 | 1.89 (1.70, 2.11)* | 1.558 (1.292, 1.877) | 7 |
| Thompson et al (2018)61 | Intelligence development of the offspring | 909 176 | 0/37/0 | 2.14 (1.20, 3.83) | 10 | |
| Zhou et al (2017)62 | Diabetic nephropathy | 545 | 5/0/0 | 1.8 (1.38, 2.35) | 7 | |
| Sun et al (2017)63 | CHD5 | 4979 | 0/10/0 | 1.17 (0.91, 1.52) | 10 | |
| Liu et al (2018)64 | Fetal growth restriction | 8958 | 0/3/0 | 2.4 (1.56, 3.7) | 9 | |
| Zhang et al (2017)67 | Premature delivery miscarriage | 6036 | 0/3/0 | 1.45 (1.07, 1.96) | 9 | |
| Nasirkandy et al (2017)71 | Preterm birth | 68 465 | 0/17/0 | 1.36 (1.09, 1.68) | 9 | |
| Xu et al (2017)79 | Fracture | 289 575 | 0/6/0 | 1.22 (0.61, 2.47) | 7 | |
| Overt hypothyroidism | ||||||
| Shiri (2014)49 | Carpal tunnel syndrome | 71 133 | 3/1/0 | 1.44 (1.27, 1.63) | 7 | |
| Gong et al (2016)37 | Gestational diabetes | 63 567 | 0/6/0 | 1.57 (1.28, 1.93)* | 1.62 (1.30, 2.01)* | 7 |
| Fang et al (2017)65 | Breast cancer | 24 571 | 12/0/0 | 0.83 (0.64, 1.08) | 9 | |
| Wang et al (2017)68 | Glaucoma | 381 695 | 2/5/4 | 1.64 (1.27, 2.13) | 9 | |
| Ning et al (2017)70 | Cardiovascular | 615 596 | 0/13/0 | 1.13 (1.01, 1.26) | 9 | |
| Nasirkandy et al (2017)71 | Preterm birth | 2 472 896 | 0/10/0 | 1.3 (1.05, 1.61) | 9 | |
| He et al (2017)73 | NAFLD | 42 143 | 4/2/4 | 1.52 (1.24, 1.87) | 10 | |
*The RR or OR calculated according to the sample size.
**†HR.
AMSTAR, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews; CC /CO /CS, case–control/cohort/cross-sectional; CHD, coronary heart disease; CKD, chronic kidney diseases; DPN, diabetic peripheral neuropathy; DN, diabetic nephropathy; DR, diabetic retinopathy; HR, hazard ratio; IGR, intrauterine growth restriction; LGA, large for gestational age; NAFLD, non- alcoholic fatty liver disease; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; RR, relative ratio; SGA, small for gestational age.
Table 6.
Association between SCH/OH and other diseases (showed by WMD/SMD)
| Author and year | Diseases | Sample size | No of included CC/CO/CS studies | WMD/SMD (95% CI) | AMSTAR score |
| Subclinical hypothyroidism | |||||
| Ye et al (2014)56 | SBP | 50 147 | 0/6/14 | 1.47 mm Hg (0.54 to 2.39 mm Hg), p=0.002 | 8 |
| DBP | 48 636 | 0/5/14 | 0.44 mm Hg (–0.15 to 1.02 mm Hg), p=0.142 | ||
| Liu et al (2014)42 | TC level | 40 546 | 3/0/13 | 12.17 mg/dL (7.79 to 16.54 mg/dL), p<0.001 | 10 |
| LDL-C level | 39 131 | 3/0/12 | 7.01 mg/dL (3.95 to 10.06 mg/dL), p<0.001 | ||
| HDL-C level | 40 559 | 3/0/13 | −0.50 mg/dL (−1.90 to 0.89 mg/dL), p=0.481 | ||
| TG level | 40 420 | 3/0/11 | 13.19 mg/dL (4.92 to 21.46 mg/dL), p<0.001 | ||
| Zhou et al (2014)58 | Plasma homocysteine status | 926 | 0/8/0 | 0.07 (−0.10 to 0.24), p=0.425* | 10 |
| Wang et al (2013)75 | C-IMT | 4551 | 0/0/9 | 0.05 mm (0.02 to 0.07 mm), p=0.000 | 9 |
| Rieben et al (2016)47 | MMSE | 16 805 | 0/11/0 | ES, 0.01 points difference from baseline (−0.10 to 0.12) | 10 |
| Aziz et al (2017)66 | C-IMT | 543 | 9 clinical trials | 0.44 mm Hg (0.14 to 0.74), p=0.004 | 10 |
| Overt hypothyroidism | |||||
| Zhang et al (2016)57 | AHI | 1389 | 0/3/2 | 0.41 (0.21 to 0.61), p<0.001* | 5 |
| Desat time | 1414 | 0/4/2 | 0.32 (0.12 to 0.51), p<0.01* | ||
| ESS | 1383 | 0/3/2 | 2.12 (0.89 to 3.35), p<0.001* | ||
| RDI | 204 | 0/3/0 | −2.17 (−11.80 to 7.46), p=0.66* | ||
| Sleeping efficiency | 444 | 0/3/0 | −1.60 (−5.57 to 2.37), p=0.43* | ||
| Time of sleep with oxygen desaturation under 90% | 1416 | 0/4/2 | 0.32 (0.12 to 0.51), p=0.001 | ||
| Zhou et al (2014)58 | Plasma homocysteine status | 586 | 2/3/0 | 0.67 (0.40 to 0.94), p=0.000* | 10 |
*SMD.
AHI, Apnoea–Hypopnoea Index; AMSTAR, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews; CCs/COs/CSs, case–control/cohort/cross-sectional studies; C-IMT, carotid intima-media thickness; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; OH, overt hypothyroidism; RDI, Respiratory Disturbance Index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SCH, subclinical hypothyroidism; SMD, standardised mean difference; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total triglyceride; WMD, weighted mean difference; ES, Expected Shortfall
Discussion
In view of the growing expansion of MAs that are related to the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases, the methodological quality of these articles was investigated. To the best of our knowledge, this study first used the AMSTAR tool to evaluate the quality of MAs in this field. The AMSTAR tool is the recommended scale for assessing design progress and minimising bias in research.
The methodological quality of the included MAs was moderate to high. Various flaws regarding the information in the included articles were found, and the main problems were the following.
First, to increase scientific credibility and improve research standards, a standard protocol for MAs must be designed. A protocol can make the research process prospective, strict and transparent. In this study, only two MAs61 72 provided an a priori study design. Whether the authors had been influenced by the published articles during a certain process in preparing the MAs is challenging to assess. Therefore, more attention should be provided in drafting the protocol.
Second, to avoid inappropriate inclusion or exclusion of articles and minimise selection bias, the AMSTAR scale recommends that at least two independent reviewers should obtain results and data. In this study, eight (15.4%) studies did not follow this recommendation, which may increase selection bias and decrease the quality of the included MAs.
Moreover, the AMSTAR scale suggested that a comprehensive search strategy with a systematic search plan and wide retrieval range should be developed. The former refers to keywords and retrieval types, and the latter indicates that at least two databases should be searched. In addition, item 3 emphasised that supplemental searching is also significantly important. Similarly, to ensure a comprehensive search and decrease selection bias, the fourth AMSTAR scale recommends that the status of publication should not be restricted, which include grey articles and published language. The authors are all willing to obtain positive outcomes, and journals published articles with positive outcomes. However, articles with negative outcomes are not usually published or only published in informal journals. The inclusion of grey articles is significant in decreasing selection bias. For item 3, one44 article was not in accordance to this item. However, for item 4, 15.4% (8/52)28 37 45 48 51 57 76 77 of the studies did not consider using published literature, which might result in selection bias.
The AMSTAR scale also suggests that a list of both the included and excluded articles should be provided. The included and excluded articles list can explicitly show the qualities of the selected articles. However, due to restricted page layouts, apart from the Cochrane MAs, most articles only listed the included articles. In this study, 51 MAs included an articles list, and one49 article had neither included nor excluded a list of articles.
The sixth item focuses on whether the characteristics of the included studies were provided. In this study, most (96.1%) of the included articles described subject, gender, age and other characteristics of included articles.
Items 7 and 8 recommend the assessment of the scientific quality of the original articles and consideration of the scientific quality when formulating conclusions, which should be based on scientific and cautious research results to provide an objective and reasonable suggestion for clinical professionals and stakeholders. Nineteen (36.5%)31 33 36 37 39 44 50 53 56 57 59 61 62 70–72 77–79 MAs did not assess the scientific quality of the included studies, which might decrease the credibility of the conclusions.
Thus, publication bias should be assessed in every MA according to the Cochrane handbook for the SRs of interventions,80 which can be performed by using a certain statistical test method or chart.81 Among the 52 included articles, seven29 40 50 54 57 62 65 failed to assess publication bias, and all of which were Chinese articles. Another area of concern is the lack of reports on the conflict of interest among the authors of the MAs. Readers should know whether the results of the MAs are influenced by any funders. In our results, 23.1% (12/52)33 50 62 67–69 74–79 of the authors did not declare any conflict of interest.
The conclusions of the included articles were summarised, and the number of randomised controlled trials/CC/CO/CS studies and patients included in each MA and the average AMSTAR score were analysed.
For the association between OH and other diseases, one MA39 has confirmed that breast cancer was significantly associated with OH. This MA included one, two and three CC, CO and CS studies, respectively. The AMSTAR score was moderate. However, another MA65 has shown that OH was not considered a risk factor of breast cancer, and such study included 24 571 participants and 12 CC study. Moreover, its AMSTAR score was high. Thus, the credibility of the conclusion is relatively high. One article43 has included 10 CO studies and shown that OH was significantly associated with increased cardiac death, hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in patients with HF. The large sample size and high AMSTAR score increased its credibility. Based on the effect of OH on gestational diabetes, one MA37 has included 225 427 patients in three CO studies and shown that OH was a risk factor of gestational diabetes. The AMSTAR score was moderate.
Six MAs40 41 48 64 71 74 have shown that pregnant women with OH were at high risk for preterm birth. The average number of patients was more than one million, and the average AMSTAR score was 8.8 (range: 8–10). By contrast, one MA40 has confirmed that maternal OH might be associated with high and low birth weight and it might reduce the risk of large for gestational age. The AMSTAR score of this article was 8. These data can provide greater power regarding the credibility of the conclusion.
Additionally, OH was significantly associated with stroke,32 left ventricular diastolic function,33 carpal tunnel syndrome,49 obstructive sleep apnea57and plasma homocysteine;58 the AMSTAR scores of MAs were from moderate to high quality. More high-quality evidence is needed to support these results.
For the association between SCH and other diseases, four MAs36 59 66 75 reported that SCH was associated with a significant increase in carotid intima-media thickness. These MAs have an average of 2420 patients, and an average AMSTAR score of 8.75. Larger study containing more patients will make the result more credible. All three MAs30 52 54 have shown that the lack of association between SCH and fractures. A large number of patients and a high AMSTAR score increased the credibility of the conclusion. In addition, one MA60 has confirmed that SCH was associated with increased risk for fractures; therefore, more high-quality evidence is needed.
Two36 42 high-quality MAs have shown that serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly higher in patients with SCH than those with euthyroidism. However, no significant difference was observed in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. SCH was associated with a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose levels but not significantly associated with Body Mass Index.36 The AMSTAR score of this article was high. However, a small sample size decreased its credibility.
The included MAs had different conclusions regarding the role of SCH in blood pressure. One MA31has shown that SCH was associated with a significant increase in diastolic blood pressure. However, the other two36 56 had a different conclusion. The former included 6 CS studies with 17 323 patients, and the two other MAs had an average of 1.7 CC studies, 1.7 CO studies and 5 CS studies with an average of 25 810 patients, and the average AMSTAR score for both MAs was 8.0. All three MAs have shown that SCH was associated with an increased systolic blood pressure.
Six MAs28 44 50 63 70 77 have assessed the effects of SCH on CHD and cardiovascular mortality. Among these, three28 44 77 have evaluated the association between SCH and CHD and confirmed that SCH was not significantly associated with an increased risk for CHD, whereas the other two studies50 63 had a conflicting result. Two50 70 MAs have shown that SCH was associated with an increased cardiovascular mortality rate from cardiovascular disease, and another two28 44 have revealed that SCH was not significantly associated with an increased mortality rate from cardiovascular disease. In addition, three studies28 44 50 have concluded that SCH is not significantly associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality. All the studies had moderate AMSTAR scores. Thus, the association between them should be further validated.
Two MAs34 35 have confirmed that SCH was not associated with MetS, and the AMSTAR scores were high. Three MAs29 45 47 have investigated the effect of SCH on cognitive function and shown that SCH was not significantly associated with cognitive impairment. A large number of studies and patients and a high AMSTAR score increased the credibility of this conclusion. In addition, two MAs38 53 have reported that SCH significantly increased the risk of complications from diabetes.
One MA48 has shown that maternal SCH is not significantly related with the occurrence of preterm birth, whereas the other four41 64 71 74 with more patients had a conflicting result, which showed that SCH increased the risk of preterm birth. Two MAs51 64 have shown that maternal SCH is significantly associated with the risk for intrauterine growth restriction, and these MAs had a moderate AMSTAR score. Three MAs35 64 76 have shown that maternal SCH also had a significant adverse effect on the intelligence of an offspring. However, the sample size of these MAs was small.
Two MAs68 69 have indicated that individuals with OH have an increased risk of developing glaucoma. These MAs included 9 CC studies, 4 CO studies and 11 CC studies, and had an average AMSTAR score of 9. One MA72 has shown no significant association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as well as SCH and OH. However, another study73 has revealed that both individuals with SCH and OH are at higher risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease than those with euthyroid; therefore, more high-quality evidence is required.
In summary, when evaluating the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases, the hypothyroidism activity index, follow-up duration, baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics should also be considered in evaluating the role of hypothyroidism in other diseases.
Conclusions
The methodological quality of the included MAs on the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases was moderate to high. MAs with high qualities confirmed that hypothyroidism was significantly associated with cardiovascular diseases, MetS, preterm birth and neonatal outcomes. Consideration of scientific quality when formulating conclusions should be made explicit and more attention should be paid to improving the methodological quality of MAs, increasing their applicability for clinical decision-making.
Strengths and limitations
To the best of our knowledge, this study first assessed the methodological quality of MAs on the association between hypothyroidism and other diseases. The included MAs were randomly selected without restriction and followed rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our study has several limitations. First, the AMSTAR appraisal process was difficult to implement when the reporting quality was poor. This could be attributed to space restrictions in some journals. Second, we tried our best to make a conversion between OR and RR by extracting raw data from MAs, but some data were not obtained.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Contributors: LT, QG and CG conceived and designed the study. FS and YQ performed the experiments. FS wrote the paper. LT and CG reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding: This research received the grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China and Province Natural Science Foundation of Gansu (grant nos and 17JR5RA041).
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Patient consent for publication: Obtained.
References
- 1. Vanderpump MP, Tunbridge WM. Epidemiology and prevention of clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid 2002;12:839–47. 10.1089/105072502761016458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD, et al. Serum TSH, T(4), and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:489–99. 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Ganie MA, et al. Status of thyroid function in Indian adults: two decades after universal salt iodization. J Assoc Physicians India 2012;60:32–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Biondi B, Bartalena L, Chiovato L, et al. Recommendations for treatment of hypothyroidism with levothyroxine and levotriiodothyronine: a 2016 position statement of the Italian Society of Endocrinology and the Italian Thyroid Association. J Endocrinol Invest 2016;39:1465–74. 10.1007/s40618-016-0511-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sun X, Sun Y, Li WC, et al. Association of thyroid-stimulating hormone and cardiovascular risk factors. Intern Med 2015;54:2537–44. 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nanchen D, Gussekloo J, Westendorp RG, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of heart failure in older persons at high cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:852–61. 10.1210/jc.2011-1978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Asvold BO, Bjøro T, Nilsen TI, et al. Thyrotropin levels and risk of fatal coronary heart disease: the HUNT study. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:855–60. 10.1001/archinte.168.8.855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Canpolat AG, Kav T, Sivri B, et al. Effects of L-thyroxine on gastric motility and ghrelin in subclinical hypothyroidism: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:E1775–E1779. 10.1210/jc.2013-1488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Resta F, Triggiani V, Barile G, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and cognitive dysfunction in the elderly. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2012;12:260–7. 10.2174/187153012802002875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Formiga F, Ferrer A, Padros G, et al. Thyroid status and functional and cognitive status at baseline and survival after 3 years of follow-up: the OCTABAIX study. Eur J Endocrinol 2014;170:69–75. 10.1530/EJE-13-0722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Waring AC, Rodondi N, Harrison S, et al. Thyroid function and prevalent and incident metabolic syndrome in older adults: the Health, Ageing and Body Composition Study. Clin Endocrinol 2012;76:911–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04328.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wang CY, Chang TC, Chen MF. Associations between subclinical thyroid disease and metabolic syndrome. Endocr J 2012;59:911–7. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ12-0076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Garin MC, Arnold AM, Lee JS, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and hip fracture and bone mineral density in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:2657–64. 10.1210/jc.2014-1051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Flynn RW, Bonellie SR, Jung RT, et al. Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration and morbidity from cardiovascular disease and fractures in patients on long-term thyroxine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:186–93. 10.1210/jc.2009-1625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nordmann AJ, Kasenda B, Briel M. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do. Swiss Med Wkly 2012;142:w13518 10.4414/smw.2012.13518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Dong J, Teng G, Wei T, et al. Methodological quality assessment of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease and pouchitis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0168785 10.1371/journal.pone.0168785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Clarke S, Wilson ML, Terhaar M. Using dashboard technology and clinical decision support systems to improve heart team efficiency and accuracy: review of the literature. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016;225:364–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Pieper D, Mathes T, Eikermann M. Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies? BMC Res Notes 2014;7:609 10.1186/1756-0500-7-609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gagnier JJ, Kellam PJ. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:e77–7. 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Remschmidt C, Wichmann O, Harder T. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination. Vaccine 2014;32:1678–84. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tian J, Zhang J, Ge L, et al. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;85:50–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74. 10.2307/2529310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cai YF, Shi JP. [Meta analysis on the relationship between subclinical hypothyroidism and the levels of systolic blood pressure]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2011;32:55–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chen X, Zhang N, Zhang WL, et al. [Meta-analysis on the association between subclinical hypothyroidism and the left ventricular functions under Doppler echocardiography]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2011;32:1269–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rodondi N, Aujesky D, Vittinghoff E, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of General Internal Medicine 2005;20:89. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rodondi N, Aujesky D, Vittinghoff E, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2006;119:541–51. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rodondi N, den Elzen WP, Bauer DC, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of coronary heart disease and mortality. JAMA 2010;304:1365–74. 10.1001/jama.2010.1361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Akintola AA, Jansen SW, van Bodegom D, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and cognitive function in people over 60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci 2015;7:150 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Blum MR, Bauer DC, Collet TH, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2015;313:2055–65. 10.1001/jama.2015.5161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cai Y, Ren Y, Shi J. Blood pressure levels in patients with subclinical thyroid dysfunction: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional data. Hypertens Res 2011;34:1098–105. 10.1038/hr.2011.91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chaker L, Baumgartner C, Ikram MA, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2014;29:791–800. 10.1007/s10654-014-9946-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen X, Zhang N, Cai Y, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function using tissue Doppler echocardiography and conventional doppler echocardiography in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism aged <60 years: a meta-analysis. J Cardiol 2013;61:8–15. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Eftekharzadeh A, Khamseh ME, Farshchi A, et al. The association between subclinical hypothyroidism and metabolic syndrome as defined by the ATP III Criteria. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2016;14:137–44. 10.1089/met.2015.0065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Fan X, Wu L. The impact of thyroid abnormalities during pregnancy on subsequent neuropsychological development of the offspring: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:3971–6. 10.3109/14767058.2016.1152248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gao N, Zhang W, Zhang YZ, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2013;227:18–25. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.10.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gong LL, Liu H, Liu LH. Relationship between hypothyroidism and the incidence of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55:171–5. 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Han C, He X, Xia X, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135233 10.1371/journal.pone.0135233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hardefeldt PJ, Eslick GD, Edirimanne S. Benign thyroid disease is associated with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;133:1169–77. 10.1007/s10549-012-2019-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hou J, Yu P, Zhu H. The impact of maternal hypothyroidism during pregnancy on neonatal outcomes_ A systematic review and meta-analysis (Gynecological Endocrinology (2015)). Endocrinology 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Li M, Wang SW, Wu FL, et al. Ethnic differences in preterm birth risks for pregnant women with thyroid dysfunction or autoimmunity: a meta-analysis. Biomed Environ Sci 2016;29:724–33. 10.3967/bes2016.097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Liu XL, He S, Zhang SF, et al. Alteration of lipid profile in subclinical hypothyroidism: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit 2014;20:1432–41. 10.12659/MSM.891163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ning N, Gao D, Triggiani V, et al. Prognostic role of hypothyroidism in heart failure: a meta-analysis. Medicine 2015;94:e1159 10.1097/MD.0000000000001159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ochs N, Auer R, Bauer DC, et al. Meta-analysis: subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk for coronary heart disease and mortality. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:832–45. 10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Pasqualetti G, Pagano G, Rengo G, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:4240–8. 10.1210/jc.2015-2046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Pergialiotis V, Konstantopoulos P, Prodromidou A, et al. Management of endocrine disease: the impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on anthropometric characteristics, lipid, glucose and hormonal profile of PCOS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 2017;176:R159–R166. 10.1530/EJE-16-0611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Rieben C, Segna D, da Costa BR, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of cognitive decline: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:4945–54. 10.1210/jc.2016-2129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Sheehan PM, Nankervis A, Araujo Júnior E, et al. Maternal thyroid disease and preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:4325–31. 10.1210/jc.2015-3074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Shiri R. Hypothyroidism and carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve 2014;50:879–83. 10.1002/mus.24453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Singh S, Duggal J, Molnar J, et al. Impact of subclinical thyroid disorders on coronary heart disease, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2008;125:41–8. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Tong Z, Xiaowen Z, Baomin C, et al. The effect of subclinical maternal thyroid dysfunction and autoimmunity on intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2016;95:e3677 10.1097/MD.0000000000003677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wirth CD, Blum MR, da Costa BR, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk for fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:189–99. 10.7326/M14-0125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wu J, Yue S, Geng J, et al. Relationship between diabetic retinopathy and subclinical hypothyroidism: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2015;5:12212 10.1038/srep12212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Yan Z, Huang H, Li J, et al. Relationship between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of fracture: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Osteoporos Int 2016;27:115–25. 10.1007/s00198-015-3221-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Yang L, Lv X, Yue F, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Endocr Res 2016;41:158–65. 10.3109/07435800.2015.1108332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ye Y, Xie H, Zeng Y, et al. Association between subclinical hypothyroidism and blood pressure--a meta-analysis of observational studies. Endocr Pract 2014;20:150–8. 10.4158/EP13237.OR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhang M, Zhang W, Tan J, et al. Role of hypothyroidism in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2016;32:1059–64. 10.1185/03007995.2016.1157461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zhou Y, Chen Y, Cao X, et al. Association between plasma homocysteine status and hypothyroidism: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:4544–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Yao K, Zhao T, Zeng L, et al. Non-invasive markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 case control studies. Sci Rep 2018;8:4579 10.1038/s41598-018-22897-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Yang R, Yao L, Fang Y, et al. The relationship between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of fracture or low bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Bone Miner Metab 2018;36:209–20. 10.1007/s00774-017-0828-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Thompson W, Russell G, Baragwanath G, et al. Maternal thyroid hormone insufficiency during pregnancy and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol 2018;88:575–84. 10.1111/cen.13550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Zhou JB, Li HB, Zhu XR, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of chronic kidney disease in T2D subjects: A case-control and dose-response analysis. Medicine 2017;96:e6519 10.1097/MD.0000000000006519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 63. Sun J, Yao L, Fang Y, et al. Relationship between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Endocrinol 2017;2017:8130796:1–15. 10.1155/2017/8130796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Liu Y, Chen H, Jing C, et al. The association between maternal subclinical hypothyroidism and growth, development, and childhood intelligence: a meta-analysis. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2018;10:153–61. 10.4274/jcrpe.4931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Fang Y, Yao L, Sun J, et al. Does thyroid dysfunction increase the risk of breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocrinol Invest 2017;40:1035–47. 10.1007/s40618-017-0679-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Aziz M, Kandimalla Y, Machavarapu A, et al. Effect of thyroxin treatment on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) reduction in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH): a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Atheroscler Thromb 2017;24:643–59. 10.5551/jat.39917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Zhang Y, Wang H, Pan X, et al. Patients with subclinical hypothyroidism before 20 weeks of pregnancy have a higher risk of miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0175708 10.1371/journal.pone.0175708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Wang S, Liu Y, Zheng G. Hypothyroidism as a risk factor for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0186634 10.1371/journal.pone.0186634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Thvilum M, Brandt F, Brix TH, et al. The interrelation between hypothyroidism and glaucoma: a critical review and meta-analyses. Acta Ophthalmol 2017;95:759–67. 10.1111/aos.13412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Ning Y, Cheng YJ, Liu LJ, et al. What is the association of hypothyroidism with risks of cardiovascular events and mortality? A meta-analysis of 55 cohort studies involving 1,898,314 participants. BMC Med 2017;15:21 10.1186/s12916-017-0777-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Parizad Nasirkandy M, Badfar G, Shohani M, et al. The relation of maternal hypothyroidism and hypothyroxinemia during pregnancy on preterm birth: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017;15:543–52. 10.29252/ijrm.15.9.543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Jaruvongvanich V, Sanguankeo A, Upala S. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is not associated with thyroid hormone levels and hypothyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Thyroid J 2017;6:208–15. 10.1159/000454920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. He W, An X, Li L, et al. Relationship between hypothyroidism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol 2017;8:335 10.3389/fendo.2017.00335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Wang S, Li M, Chu D, et al. [Clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoantibody before 20 weeks pregnancy and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2014;49:816–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wang HL, Zhang N, Zhang WL, et al. Associations between subclinical hypothyroidism and carotid intima media thickness: a meta analysis. Chinese General Practice 2013;16:479–82. [Google Scholar]
- 76. XY X, Xie M, Li Z, et al. A meta-analysis about the impact on the mental development of the offspring by pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Intern Med 2014;31:46–8. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Zhang N, Zhang WL, Shi JP. A meta-analysis on relationship between subclinical hypothyroidism and coronary heart disease. Chinese General Practice 2011;14:125–9. [Google Scholar]
- 78. Zhou JB, Zhu XR, Zhao YY, et al. Relationship between chronic kidney disease and subclinical hypothyroidism in T2DM subjects: a case-control and dose-response analysis. J ClinPathol Res 2016;36:1096–102. [Google Scholar]
- 79. X J, X G, Z L, et al. Relationship between the subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk for fracture: A meta analysis. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Collaboration TC. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2011. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/.
- 81. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
bmjopen-2018-024111supp001.pdf (85.8KB, pdf)
bmjopen-2018-024111supp002.pdf (297.1KB, pdf)

