Abstract
Purpose:
To examine the relationship between serum oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) cholesterol and the incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) over a 25-year period in a sample of persons from the population-based Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES).
Design:
Observational prospective cohort study.
Participants:
A total of 4,972 people from the BDES (aged 43 to 84 and living in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin in 1988) seen during at least one of six examination phases at approximately 5-year intervals between 1988 and 2016.
Methods:
A 50% random sample of participants (N=2,468) was selected for ox-LDL measurements. Stored frozen specimens from every exam phase were processed using an ELISA assay from a single batch. All available intervals were included for a person, resulting in 6,586 person-visits.
Main Outcome Measures:
AMD was assessed using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System and severity was defined using a 5-step severity scale. The severity of the worse eye at each examination was used for analyses. A Multi-State Markov (MSM) model was fit to simultaneously assess the ox-LDL relationship to all AMD transitions including incidence of any AMD, incidence of late AMD, and worsening and improvement of AMD over the 25 years of the study.
Results:
The mean (SD) level of ox-LDL was 75.3 (23.1) U/L at the baseline examination. While adjusting for age, sex, ARMS2 and CFH risk alleles, and examination phase, the ox-LDL at the beginning of a period was not statistically significantly associated with the incidence of any AMD (Hazard Ratio (HR) per 10 U/L ox-LDL was 1.03, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.98,1.09). Further, ox-LDL was not associated with worsening anywhere along the AMD severity scale nor incidence of late AMD. The lack of relationships of ox-LDL to the incidence of any AMD or worsening of AMD remained after adjustment for history of statin use, smoking status, body mass index, and history of cardiovascular disease (data not shown).
Conclusions:
Our findings do not provide evidence for statistically significant relationships between ox-LDL and AMD disease development or worsening of AMD.
Introduction
Despite new medical and surgical interventions, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) remains a leading cause of vision loss in people 65 years of age or older in the United States.1, 2 While there is a growing body of information regarding the natural history of AMD and its relation to risk factors, gaps still remain in our understanding of its earliest stages and what factors are associated with risk for its incidence and progression.3–5 This is important as the treatment for late neovascular AMD carries some risks, may not be permanent, and is costly.6 In addition, there are no treatment options for geographic atrophy.7 Thus, there is need for additional therapeutic approaches at early stages of the disease to delay or prevent worsening to late stages of AMD, both neovascular and geographic atrophy.3
Because the oxidative process is thought to be linked to AMD it is hypothesized that oxidized serum LDL (ox-LDL) would be a reasonable biomarker of oxidative stress in the retina, rather than native serum LDL, 8–19 To our knowledge there are no population-based long-term cohort studies that have examined the association of serum ox-LDL cholesterol with the incidence and worsening of AMD. To this end, our objective was to determine the relationships of a modifiable risk factor, ox-LDL cholesterol, to the incidence and worsening of AMD20 in the Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES).
Methods
Study Population
Detailed descriptions of the BDES cohort, participation statistics, and reasons for nonparticipation have appeared elsewhere.21–26 From 1987 to 1988 a private census of the city and township of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin identified all 5,924 individuals in the target age range (43 to 84 years) and these persons were invited to have a baseline examination and up to five follow-up examinations at approximately 5-yr intervals. Approximately 80% of surviving eligible individuals participated during each examination phase. There were 4,972 people seen at any examination phase (4926 seen at baseline, 3721 at BDES2, 2962 at BDES3, 2375 at BDES4, 1913 at BDES5 and 1181 at BDES6). A 50% random sample of these 4,972 people was selected, regardless of the availability of samples or number of exams. All visits for the 2468 selected individuals were eligible for analyses (2440 seen at baseline, 1867 at BDES2, 1464 at BDES3, 1196 at BDES4, 948 at BDES5 and 604 at BDES6). The information across all exam phases was used, resulting in 8519 (50%) of the 17078 person-visits. Examinations were done at the clinic as well as off-site with participating clinics, nursing homes and some in-home exams for homebound individuals. The same protocols were used at all locations. Ninety-nine percent of the cohort was white.
Approval was granted by the institutional review board at the University of Wisconsin. Written informed consent was also granted by the institutional review board for the use and disclosure of protected health information which was obtained from all subjects before being enrolled in the study and before each examination. The study was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Examination.
Pertinent parts of the examination included the measurements of blood pressure, height and weight and the recording of answers to questions regarding the use of tobacco products and the consumption of alcoholic drinks was ascertained. A history of using lipid-lowering medications was also ascertained.
Laboratory Procedures for Ox-LDL
Non-fasting blood samples were collected at all BDES examinations, with the exception of BDES4. The blood samples were processed within 1 hour of collection and serum was frozen at −80°C. A participant could have stored samples from up to 5 visits. Following the BDES6 examination phase, 6431 frozen serum samples from the randomly selected participants were sent to the University of Minnesota Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (ARDL, Minneapolis MN). Ox-LDL was measured in serum using a solid phase two site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ox-LDL ELISA enzyme immunoassay kit, Lot#25806, Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Serum samples were automatically pipetted using a Beckman Coulter Biomek NXp instrument (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). The intensity of the color was measured on a SpectraMax spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The interassay laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) for the ox-LDL method for an in-house pooled serum control was 6.9% at a mean concentration of 48.9 U/L. Serum samples have shown excellent long-term stability when continuously stored at −80°C.
Assessment of Presence and Severity of AMD
After the participants’ pupils were dilated, 30° st ereoscopic color film photographs of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 3 standard fields of the retina (Field 1 centered on the optic disc, Field 2 centered on the fovea, and non-stereo Field 3 centered temporal to Field 2) were obtained for each eye at each examination. The Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy classification system was used for grading of AMD lesions, such as on drusen size, type and area of involvement, signs of pigmentary abnormalities (increased retinal pigment and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) depigmentation) and signs of geographic atrophy and/or signs of exudative AMD. Eyes with dramatic changes (disappearance of AMD lesions) between visits were reviewed, masked to visit order, to confirm the changes were real. Disappearance of drusen does happen, but most other disappearance occurs when lesions are not visible within the image anymore (e.g., detachments that have settled, etc), The 3-Continent 5-step AMD severity scale was used to define the presence and severity of AMD.27 Eyes were defined as having no AMD (Level 10), minimally severe early AMD (Level 20), moderately severe early AMD (Level 30), severe early AMD (Level 40), and late AMD (Level 50). Analyses were done based on the severity in the worse eye.
Definitions
Age was defined as age at the time of each examination. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were defined as the average of the 2 measurements taken according to the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program protocol.28 Hypertension was defined as blood pressure of 140/90mmHg or current use of blood pressure lowering medication. A current smoker was defined as a person who had smoked more than 100 cigarettes in his or her lifetime and reports still smoking. Heavy drinking was defined as ever having a period of time where the subject consumed 4 or more drinks a day, on average. Body mass index (BMI) was defined as the participant’s weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. History of cardiovascular disease was defined based on self-reported history of angina, myocardial infarction or stroke. Glycosylated hemoglobin was measured at each examination and diabetes was defined based on self-report and/or a glycosylated hemoglobin A1c > 6.5%. Serum creatinine was measured by an enzymatic method (CREA plus®; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using the Roche Modular P Chemistry Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics), consistent with the current National Kidney Disease Education Program (NKDEP) recommendations for standardizing serum creatinine measurement.29 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula.30 Serum total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured at BDES1 and BDES2, and were obtained through an ancillary study (Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study)31 conducted at the same time as the BDES3 examination phase. Measurement of native LDL cholesterol was not available for this population. The A69S polymorphism of the ARMS2 gene (rs 10490924) and the Y402H polymorphism of the CHF gene (rs 1061170) were available in the population. The number of risk alleles from each polymorphism was added and the risk was coded as low (0–1 risk alleles), moderate (2 risk alleles) and high (3–4 risk alleles).32
Statistics
Comparisons of baseline characteristics for persons selected for the ox-LDL measurements was done using standard regression (linear regression for continuous measures and logistic regression for binary measures). Multi-State Markov (MSM) models were used to evaluate the associations of known and potential risk factors with the incidence, worsening, and improving of AMD in continuous time. At any given age, subjects belonged to one of six possible states: death or one of the 5 AMD severity levels (figure 1). Instantaneous transitions were allowed between adjacent AMD states at any time, with one exception; regression from late AMD (level 50) to severe early (level 40) was not allowed. Twelve transition intensities represent the hazard (instantaneous probability) of moving between adjacent states. Dependence of transition intensities on the exposure (ox-LDL) and covariates were specified using log-linear regression models with updating of time-varying factors. These models have previously been fit in this population.32–34
Figure 1:
Transition diagram for the MSM model for the 5 levels of AMD and an absorbing state of death. Boxes represent possible states for a person (worse eye) at any point in time. Changes between states over time (i.e. the outcomes) being simultaneously modelled are represented by arrows. The solid lines (h12, h23, h34 and h45) represent incidence and progression transitions for AMD. The dashed lines (h21, h32, h43) represent regression transitions. Transitions to death (h1D, h2D, h3D, h4D, h5D) are allowed from all AMD states.
The MSM incorporates all available information on the history of disease progression into likelihood calculations. Current AMD severity was observed at intermittent study follow-up visits, which could be unevenly spaced, so exact transition times and the number of intermediate transitions were unobserved. Death times were available, but AMD severity at death was unknown. If subjects were alive at the end of follow-up, then final AMD severity was unknown. At study visits, the exam AMD state for the worse eye may not be known; for example, if the right eye had moderately severe early AMD (level 30) but the left eye was ungradable, the severity in the worse eye could be level 30, 40 or 50. The MSM models were set up to account for these unobserved possibilities. People were included in these analyses if they had at least one examination with both AMD status known in both eyes and ox-LDL measured. All subsequent visits with either AMD status (even if unknown in one eye) or ox-LDL values were also included. The final visit was based on survival status and date from annual follow-up with every participant. Deaths were identified by review of obituaries from local papers. Throughout this study, matches to the National Death Index have confirmed that the close ties this population has to the community means review of obituaries is quite complete and allows us to use the most up-to-date death information when cause-specific details are not needed.
Analyses were conducted in SAS version 9 and R35 using the MSM package.36 Covariate effects on transition intensities were summarized as hazard ratios, with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
The 50% random sample selected 2,468 persons (8519 person-visits) for measurement, regardless of number of examinations, availability of sample or AMD measures. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of those selected in the random sample to confirm no selection bias was present. The selected group had fewer women and slightly higher hsCRP than the full population but most characteristics were similar. Among the 8,519 person-visits within selected individuals, samples were available at 6,431 from which ox-LDL was measured. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of ox-LDL at baseline (N=1938) was 75.3 (23.1) U/L. The median was 73.0 U/L. Ox-LDL was normally distributed in the population at baseline with the mean shifting to the left at more recent exam phases (mean (median) at BDES 6 is 51.4 (49) U/L) (Figure 2). Statin use has increased from <5% in first two exam phases to over 50% by the most recent examination phase. At each examination, ox-LDL was lower among statin users, but even among non-statin users, there remains a left shift, so statin use does not entirely explain the left shift in ox-LDL. Ox-LDL was found to be correlated to several factors, including age, serum total cholesterol, history of statin use, eGFR, diabetes status, blood pressure, and BMI.
Table 1:
Comparison of baseline characteristics for those included (selected for ELISA) and Excluded
Full Population | Selected (Random) | P-value* | In MSM Analysis | P-value** | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | N | Mean/% (SD) | N | Mean/% (SD) | Vs Full | N | Mean/% (SD) | Vs Selected |
Age (years) | 4926 | 62.0 ( 11.2) | 2440 | 62.1 ( 11.2) | 0.83 | 1883 | 60.7 ( 10.7) | <.001 |
Sex (%M) | 4926 | 43.9% | 2440 | 41.3% | <.001 | 1883 | 41.5% | 0.63 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 4881 | 28.8 ( 5.4) | 2419 | 28.8 ( 5.5) | 0.80 | 1875 | 28.7 ( 5.5) | 0.21 |
Systolic BP (mmHg) | 4923 | 132.1 ( 20.5) | 2439 | 132.2 ( 20.4) | 0.99 | 1882 | 131.1 ( 19.7) | 0.07 |
Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 4923 | 77.3 ( 11.0) | 2439 | 77.2 ( 11.0) | 0.34 | 1882 | 77.6 ( 10.8) | 0.64 |
Pulse Pressure (mmHg) | 4923 | 54.8 ( 17.8) | 2439 | 55.0 ( 18.0) | 0.51 | 1882 | 53.5 ( 17.0) | 0.01 |
Hypertension | 4917 | 50.6% | 2435 | 51.3% | 0.37 | 1880 | 49.6% | 0.76 |
Current Smoker | 4921 | 19.7% | 2438 | 19.6% | 0.94 | 1883 | 20.1% | 0.26 |
Cardiovascular Disease | 4855 | 15.1% | 2401 | 15.3% | 0.63 | 1858 | 12.8% | 0.002 |
Diabetes | 4901 | 10.8% | 2422 | 11.2% | 0.30 | 1873 | 9.6% | <.001 |
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m) | 4880 | 79.5 ( 18.0) | 2415 | 79.5 ( 18.1) | 0.84 | 1874 | 80.6 ( 17.5) | 0.31 |
hsCRP (mg/L) | 4880 | 4.6 ( 10.1) | 2415 | 4.9 ( 11.1) | 0.010 | 1874 | 4.6 ( 10.7) | 0.03 |
Cystatin-C (mg/L) | 4639 | 0.9 ( 0.3) | 2289 | 0.9 ( 0.3) | 0.76 | 1778 | 0.9 ( 0.3) | 0.01 |
Total Serum Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 4906 | 233.6 ( 44.2) | 2430 | 232.7 ( 44.8) | 0.15 | 1879 | 233.1 ( 44.0) | 0.07 |
Serum HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 4903 | 52.0 ( 17.6) | 2427 | 52.2 ( 18.0) | 0.27 | 1878 | 53.0 ( 18.3) | <.001 |
Lipid Lowering Meds | 4906 | 4.5% | 2431 | 4.4% | 0.82 | 1879 | 4.7% | 0.06 |
Statin Meds | 4904 | 0.5% | 2430 | 0.6% | 0.52 | 1879 | 0.5% | 0.41 |
Any Cataract, worse eye | 4513 | 30.0% | 2226 | 29.9% | 0.98 | 1776 | 26.5% | 0.16 |
Any AMD, worse eye | 4500 | 22.6% | 2219 | 23.2% | 0.24 | 1844 | 22.5% | 0.86 |
Late AMD, worse eye | 4499 | 1.6% | 2220 | 1.5% | 0.53 | 1847 | 1.1% | 0.11 |
High genetic risk ARMS2-CFH | 4331 | 7.7% | 2153 | 7.7% | 0.90 | 1883 | 7.6% | 0.85 |
Age-adjusted comparison of those selected for ELISA panel (among the Full population)
Age-adjusted comparison of those included in the final MSM models (among those selected for ELISA panel)
Figure 2:
Distribution of oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) at each examination, including distribution by statin use. Line shows mean ox-LDL (U/L) at each examination. Circles show the mean among statin users (solid filled) and non-users (open). The vertical bars show the percent of the population taking statins (see axis values to the right). The numbers with measurement are 1938 at BDES1, 1786 at BDES2, 1324 at BDES3, 868 at BDES4 and 515 at BDES5. No ox-LDL measures were available at BDES4 for any participant (N=1196).
Oxidized LDL was imputed from earlier visits, but there were still 724 of the 8519 person-visits selected where there was no oxidized LDL measurement that could be used or imputed. In addition, 420 person-visits did not have at least one eye gradable for AMD along with ox-LDL measures and 789 did not have data for one of the ARMS2 or CFH risk alleles. The 6,586 person-visits included in the MSM analysis come from 1,893 individuals. Comparison of the BDES1 characteristics for the individuals included in the analyses to those that drop out (among the 2,468 selected people) is shown in the last two columns of Table 1. Those that drop from analyses are more likely to be older, to have cardiovascular disease, to have diabetes and to have lower serum HDL cholesterol. This is similar to differences often found for analyses in this population, because older and sicker individuals are less likely to have gradable images for AMD. Indeed the characteristics for people included in this analysis is very similar to the characteristics for people from the full population that were included in previously published MSM analyses of this outcome.
Person-specific covariates (sex, ARMS2-CFH risk) and time-varying covariates (age), exposure (ox-LDL) and AMD status are included for each examination. A final status, dead or alive (based on date of death) is also included following the last known examination for a person. The 6,586 person-visits include 1,884 as the final visit for a person (1213 died following that visit and 671 were still alive and not seen), 4,502 where the visits were from consecutive examinations (1211 BDES1 to BDES2, 1143 BDES2 to BDES3, 914 BDES3 to BDES4, 742 BDES4 to BDES5) and 200 were from pairs of visits that had a missed interim examination. The length of the interval ranged from a few days to 29 years but most of the time (quartiles Q1 to Q3) was between 4.5 and 5.5 years, with a median of 5 years between records. The distribution of AMD levels for these pairs of visits is shown in Table 2. Among the 4702 person-visits with pairs of examinations, both visits had gradable AMD for 4182 person-visits, the remaining had at least partial AMD information. There were 308 (9%) with AMD (level 20 to 50) at the follow-up visit among the 3245 without AMD (level 10) at the start of the interval. Late AMD (level 50) was observed at follow-up in 62 (2%) of the 4117 (3245+561+254+57) person-visits without late AMD at the start of the interval. The grading represents what is seen, and does not use information from other visits or eyes to guide the evaluation, so regression and improvement may represent true improvement (disappearance of small drusen) or variations in imaging where a lesion was no longer visible.
Table 2:
Observed State Transitions During Consecutive Visit Intervals*
AMD Level at START of Interval | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No AMD (level 10) | Minimal Early AMD (level 20) | Moderate Early AMD (level 30) | Severe Early AMD (level 40) | Late AMD (level 50) | Unknown in at least one eye | |
N=4499 | N=889 | N=486 | N=106 | N=167 | N=439 | |
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |
AMD Level at END of Interval | ||||||
10 | 2937 (65%) | 81 (9%) | 2 (<1%) | 0 (0%) | NA | 40 (9%) |
20 | 212 (5%) | 339 (38%) | 37 (8%) | 0 (0%) | NA | 12 (3%) |
30 | 88 (2%) | 120 (13%) | 147 (30%) | 6 (6%) | NA | 10 (2%) |
40 | 7 (<1%) | 15 (2%) | 41 (8%) | 23 (22%) | NA | 6 (1%) |
50 | 1 (<1%) | 6 (<1%) | 27 (6%) | 28 (26%) | 65 (39%) | 11 (3%) |
10–50 | 217 (5%) | 34 (4%) | 13 (3%) | 2 (2%) | 4 (2%) | 80 (18%) |
20–50 | 6 (<1%) | 15 (2%) | 3 (<1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (<1%) | 10 (2%) |
30–50 | 4 (<1%) | 9 (1%) | 17 (3%) | 4 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (3%) |
40–50 | 0 (0%) | 1 (<1%) | 3 (<1%) | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (<1%) |
Death | 604 (13%) | 189 (21%) | 140 (29%) | 31 (29%) | 78 (47%) | 171 (39%) |
Alive (no exam) | 423 (9%) | 80 (9%) | 56 (12%) | 9 (8%) | 19 (11%) | 84 (19%) |
Consecutive visit intervals are from one examination (START of interval) to the next examination or to the final censoring status (alive and no later exams or dead). The median time between examinations is 5 years, but some intervals may be longer (if missing an interim examination).
The results of the MSM model are shown in Table 3. The table shows the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the associations of ox-LDL with each of the possible transitions (see figure 1) of AMD while adjusting for other covariates. The association is considered significant if the 95% CI does not include 1. The HR (95% CI) for incidence of any AMD (transition from Level 10 to Level 20) was 1.03 (0.98–1.09) per 10 U/L while the HR for incidence of late AMD (transition from Level 40 to Level 50) was 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) per 10 U/L. The only significant association of ox-LDL with AMD was for regression from level 40 to 30, which was only observed in 6 person-visits. Table 3 also shows the associations of the other covariates with the AMD transitions as well as all the associations with the transitions to death, including the risks for death from each of the AMD levels. Age and CFH-ARMS2 risk alleles are associated with most AMD incidence and progression transitions as well as death. Ox-LDL was not associated with death. Additional models were considered with adjustment for factors associated with ox-LDL, such as statin use, renal function, smoking status and BMI, but none of these factors showed evidence of being confounders of the ox-LDL and AMD associations and were not included in the final model. Analyses using quartiles of ox-LDL also showed no suggestion of a threshold effect from highest (or lowest) quartiles.
Table 3:
MSM model results for Oxidized-LDL (oxLDL) with 5 level AMD outcome (worse eye)
Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval for MSM Transitions: | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Incidence of Any AMD | Progression of AMD | Incidence of Late AMD | Disappearance of AMD | Regression of AMD | Death | |||
Factor | (10 to 20) | (20 to 30) | (30 to 40) | (40 to 50) | (20 to 10) | (30 to 20) | (40 to 30) | |
oxLDL (per 10 U/L) | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.98 (0.93–1.04) | 0.98 (0.89–1.08) | 0.97 (0.86–1.09) | 0.99 (0.90–1.09) | 1.04 (0.90–1.19) | 0.67 (0.49–0.93) * | 1.00 (0.97–1.02) |
Age (per 5 yr) | 1.54 (1.45–1.65) * | 1.36 (1.25–1.48) * | 1.29 (1.08–1.54) * | 1.30 (1.06–1.58) * | 1.07 (0.93–1.23) | 0.89 (0.73–1.07) | 2.71 (1.24–5.94) * | 1.75 (1.68–1.81) * |
Sex (male) | 1.01 (0.80–1.26) | 0.81 (0.61–1.08) | 0.68 (0.40–1.16) | 1.27 (0.66–2.43) | 1.22 (0.78–1.89) | 0.69 (0.35–1.38) | 5.58 (0.83–37.7) | 1.42 (1.26–1.60) * |
Gene risk: Mod vs Low** | 1.39 (1.09–1.78) * | 1.53 (1.13–2.06) * | 1.59 (0.92–2.75) | 1.65 (0.92–2.98) | 0.75 (0.42–1.31) | 0.48 (0.21–1.10) | 2.17 (0.45–10.4) | 1.00 (0.87–1.14) |
Gene risk: High vs Low** | 1.51 (1.00–2.29) * | 1.97 (1.26–3.06) * | 1.84 (1.03–3.29) * | 3.28 (1.58–6.81) * | 0.54 (0.17–1.75) | 0.36 (0.08–1.68) | 0.18 (0.00–21.5) | 1.01 (0.81–1.27) |
Visit | 0.93 (0.85–1.01) | 0.96 (0.86–1.07) | 1.04 (0.84–1.29) | 1.12 (0.87–1.44) | 1.46 (1.22–1.75) * | 1.10 (0.83–1.45) | 1.20 (0.52–2.73) | 0.91 (0.87–0.95) * |
AMD: 20 vs 10 | 0.90 (0.61–1.31) | |||||||
AMD: 30 vs 10 | 1.48 (1.17–1.87) * | |||||||
AMD: 40 vs 10 | 0.36 (0.07–1.89) | |||||||
AMD: 50 vs 10 | 1.19 (0.92–1.53) |
Significant association (95% Confidence Interval does not include 1).
Gene risk is defined as low (0–1 risk alleles), moderate (2 risk alleles) and high (3–4 risk alleles)
Discussion
We did not find any evidence of statistically significant relationships of higher levels of ox-LDL cholesterol to the incidence and progression of AMD in the BDES. Our findings are consistent with earlier findings from the BDES of a lack of relationships of two other oxidative stress biomarkers, serum 8-isoprostane (8-iso), a biomarker of lipid oxidation and total carbonyl content (TCC), a biomarker of protein oxidation to the incidence of early AMD.37 To our knowledge there are no other population-based data with which to compare our findings.
The RPE has been shown to be vulnerable to oxidative damage by radical-catalyzed lipid peroxidation.38–40 The lack of an association may be due to oxidative stress not being related to the incidence or progression of early or late AMD or that the three biomarkers (ox-LDL, 8-iso and TCC) do not reflect oxidative stress occurring at the cellular level at the RPE. In a study involving 77 patients with AMD and 75 control participants, plasma F2 isoprostane, an oxidative stress biomarker, was found not to be related to AMD after adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status.41 The role of ox-LDL in the pathogenesis of AMD is not well understood. We had hypothesized that there would be a direct relationship of serum ox-LDL to the development and progression of AMD based on previous observations in studies of human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in tissue culture which showed that exposure to ox-LDL, but not native LDL, resulted in apoptosis and RPE cell death. In other studies, immune complexes of ox-LDL have been shown to affect transcriptional responses of genes involved in inflammatory pathways, a mechanism hypothesized to be involved in the pathogenesis of AMD.42 We are unaware of population-based studies that have examined differences in the relationship of native LDL to oxidized LDL and the incidence or worsening of AMD.
A strength of our study was the inclusion of standard protocols to measure AMD from fundus photographs during a 25-year period in a representative population-based study. Our measurement of ox-LDL several times over 25 years, in many of the individuals, provided us with a representative estimate of association over a lifetime. An advantage of using the MSM model is its ability to account for survival as well as all stages of AMD. The incidence of late AMD was low, but accumulating all cases over 25 years maximizes our power. While failure to reject the null hypothesis does not necessarily provide strong evidence in support of a negative finding (possibly reflecting a lack of power to detect meaningful differences), the narrow confidence intervals in the current study, which exclude any differences of clinical significance, do, in fact, provide strong support for a true lack of association.
Conclusions
These data do not support a role of oxidative stress as measured using serum levels of ox-LDL in the pathogenesis of AMD. There are likely to be many mechanisms involved in the development of this complex multifactorial disease.
Acknowledgments
Financial Support: This study was supported by grant EY06594 (to B.K., R.K.) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Ferris FL 3rd, Tielsch JM. Blindness and visual impairment: a public health issue for the future as well as today. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122(4):451–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122(4):477–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ambati J, Fowler BJ. Mechanisms of age-related macular degeneration. Neuron 2012;75(1):26–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fletcher AE. Free radicals, antioxidants and eye diseases: evidence from epidemiological studies on cataract and age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Res 2010;44(3):191–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gehrs KM, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hageman GS. Age-related macular degeneration--emerging pathogenetic and therapeutic concepts. Ann Med 2006;38(7):450–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Solomon SD, Lindsley K, Vedula SS, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014(8):CD005139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuno N, Fujii S. Dry age-related macular degeneration: recent progress of therapeutic approaches. Curr Mol Pharmacol 2011;4(3):196–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sies H Oxidative stress: oxidants and antioxidants. Exp Physiol 1997;82(2):291–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jarrett SG, Boulton ME. Consequences of oxidative stress in age-related macular degeneration. Mol Aspects Med 2012;33(4):399–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cai X, McGinnis JF. Oxidative stress: the achilles’ heel of neurodegenerative diseases of the retina. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2012;17:1976–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hollyfield JG. Age-related macular degeneration: the molecular link between oxidative damage, tissue-specific inflammation and outer retinal disease: the Proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(3):1275–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Handelman GJ. Evaluation of oxidant stress in dialysis patients. Blood Purif 2000;18(4):343–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Decanini A, Nordgaard CL, Feng X, et al. Changes in select redox proteins of the retinal pigment epithelium in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143(4):607–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tsao YP, Ho TC, Chen SL, Cheng HC. Pigment epithelium-derived factor inhibits oxidative stress-induced cell death by activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases in cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells. Life Sci 2006;79(6):545–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pow DV, Sullivan RK, Williams SM, WoldeMussie E. Macular degeneration. In: Penfold PL, Provis JM, eds. Berlin; New York, NY: Springer, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morrow JD, Frei B, Longmire AW, et al. Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers. Smoking as a cause of oxidative damage. N Engl J Med 1995;332(18):1198–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Davies MJ, Fu S, Wang H, Dean RT. Stable markers of oxidant damage to proteins and their application in the study of human disease. Free Radic Biol Med 1999;27(11–12):1151–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Locatelli F, Canaud B, Eckardt KU, et al. Oxidative stress in end-stage renal disease: an emerging threat to patient outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18(7):1272–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Macular degeneration. In: Penfold PL, Provis JM, eds. Berlin; New York, NY: Springer, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mulder DJ, Water TV, Lutgers HL, et al. Skin autofluorescence, a novel marker for glycemic and oxidative stress-derived advanced glycation endproducts: an overview of current clinical studies, evidence, and limitations. Diabetes Technol Ther 2006;8(5):523–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL, De Mets DL. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: visual acuity. Ophthalmology 1991;98(8):1310–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Linton KL, Klein BE, Klein R. The validity of self-reported and surrogate-reported cataract and age-related macular degeneration in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134(12):1438–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Klein R, Klein BE, Lee KE. Changes in visual acuity in a population. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996;103(8):1169–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Klein R, Klein BE, Lee KE, et al. Changes in visual acuity in a population over a 10-year period : The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2001;108(10):1757–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Klein R, Klein BE, Lee KE, et al. Changes in visual acuity in a population over a 15-year period: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142(4):539–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Klein R, Lee KE, Gangnon RE, Klein BE. Incidence of visual impairment over a 20-year period: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2013;120(6):1210–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Klein R, Meuer SM, Myers CE, et al. Harmonizing the classification of age-related macular degeneration in the three-continent AMD consortium. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2014;21(1):14–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.The hypertension detection and follow-up program: Hypertension detection and follow-up program cooperative group. Prev Med 1976;5(2):207–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem 2006;52(1):5–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150(9):604–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cruickshanks KJ, Tweed TS, Wiley TL, et al. The 5-year incidence and progression of hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129(10):1041–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Klein R, Myers CE, Meuer SM, et al. Risk alleles in CFH and ARMS2 and the long-term natural history of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131(3):383–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gangnon RE, Lee KE, Klein BE, et al. Effect of the Y402H variant in the complement factor H gene on the incidence and progression of age-related macular degeneration: results from multistate models applied to the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130(9):1169–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gangnon RE, Lee KE, Klein BE, et al. Severity of age-related macular degeneration in 1 eye and the incidence and progression of age-related macular degeneration in the fellow eye: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133(2):125–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Team RDC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jackson CH. Multi-state models for panel data: the msm package for R. J Stat Softw. 2011;38(8):1–28. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Klein R, Myers CE, Cruickshanks KJ, et al. Markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction and the 20-year cumulative incidence of early age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132(4):446–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Beatty S, Koh H, Phil M, et al. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;45(2):115–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cai J, Nelson KC, Wu M, et al. Oxidative damage and protection of the RPE. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000;19(2):205–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fessel JP, Jackson Roberts L. Isofurans: novel products of lipid peroxidation that define the occurrence of oxidant injury in settings of elevated oxygen tension. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005;7(1–2):202–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brantley MA Jr., Osborn MP, Sanders BJ, et al. Plasma biomarkers of oxidative stress and genetic variants in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(3):460–7 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gnanaguru G, Choi AR, Amarnani D, D’Amore PA. Oxidized Lipoprotein Uptake Through the CD36 Receptor Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57(11):4704–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]