Skip to main content
Journal of the Intensive Care Society logoLink to Journal of the Intensive Care Society
letter
. 2018 Nov 15;20(2):NP8. doi: 10.1177/1751143718814125

Decision-making in intensive care: Influence of DNACPR status

Emma-Jane Smith 1,
PMCID: PMC6475994  PMID: 31037115

Editor,

The findings of the engaging review article by James et al.1 raise an interesting ethical consideration.

The authors found that the presence of a Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) order was associated with a significantly higher rate of non-acceptance to critical care by reviewing intensivists. Although association and causation are separate entities and the extent to which this individual factor contributed to the decision is uncertain, it is conceivable that DNACPR status may in some cases trigger heuristic decision-making on the part of the intensivist regarding the decision of whether or not to admit to critical care.

When speaking to patients and their relatives about resuscitation status, we frequently make assurances that DNACPR applies to CPR alone, and that no other aspect of care will be affected; this intent is in line with established national guidance.2 Despite this, there exists evidence that a DNACPR order does negatively influence the likelihood of a variety of both medical and nursing interventions, including referral to critical care from parent teams.35

Is it therefore possible that we are inadvertently denying access to critical care to patients who may benefit from it, and how can we address this problem? Should intensivists be initially blinded to DNACPR status when reviewing critical care referrals in order to minimise this heuristic bias?

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1.James FR, Power N, Laha S. Decision-making in intensive care medicine – a review. J Intensive Care Med 2018; 19: 247–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: guidance from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing, www.resus.org.uk/dnacpr/decisions-relating-to-cpr/ (2016, accessed 27 August 2018).
  • 3.Beach MC, Morrison RS. The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 2057–2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen JL, Sosnov J, Lessard D, et al. Impact of do-not-resuscitation orders on quality of care performance measures in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. Am Heart J 2008; 156: 78–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Henneman EA, Baird B, Bellamy PE, et al. Effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on the nursing care of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 1994; 3: 467–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Intensive Care Society are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES