Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018 Sep 28;47(4):715–726. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.07.001

Update on Dietary Management of Childhood Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders

Bruno P Chumpitazi 1
PMCID: PMC6476188  NIHMSID: NIHMS1003156  PMID: 30337028

INTRODUCTION

Functional bowel disorders (also termed disorders of the brain-gut axis) affect up to 20% of the world’s adult and pediatric population.1 Based on the latest Rome IV classification, pediatric functional bowel disorders associated with abdominal pain include: functional dyspepsia (which may be associated with postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain); irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in which the abdominal pain is associated with defecation and/or changes in frequency of stool or stool form; abdominal migraine; and functional abdominal pain not otherwise specified.1 Children with these disorders (as compared to healthy controls) have a decreased overall quality of life.2

Functional bowel disorder etiology is attributed to several potential factors. These may include: early life stress; psychosocial distress (e.g. somatization); post-infectious physiology; low-grade gut inflammation; gut microbiome abnormalities (dysbiosis); genetics; visceral hypersensitivity, and diet.3 Diet plays a significant role in the majority of children with functional bowel disorders as up to 93% identify at least one food and/or food type as being associated with a worsening in gastrointestinal symptoms.46 In adolescents with IBS, gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diet occurred more than three days per week.6 Subjects with functional bowel disorders (as compared to healthy controls) avoid foods more frequently and self-implement additional dietary strategies including modification (e.g. removing ingredients) of the foods they eat.46

Despite the common clinical experience of diet being associated with worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, there are several challenges. One clinical challenge is that children with functional bowel disorders may perceive a wide variety of foods as being potential culprits; however, they do not uniformly identify the same food culprits (Table 1). In one study of children with IBS, the most frequently identified food culprit (dairy) was identified by only approximately 1/3 of the subjects.5 This finding is not unique to children with functional bowel disorders as adults with IBS also identify a wide variety of potential culprit foods and do not consistently identify a single food or food type as being a culprit.7 An additional clinical challenge relates to strength of the association of a potential food culprit and subsequent symptom generation. When asked to rate symptom correlation (rarely, sometimes, often, always) when eating a presumed symptom inducing food, children with functional bowel disorders do not consistently identify the same foods as either often or always causing their gastrointestinal symptoms.4 This lack of absolute association with symptoms with perceived culprit foods may explain the high percentage of children with functional bowel disorders consuming a potential culprit food based on 24 hour dietary recall.4

Table 1:

The top 10 most commonly identified foods in children with functional bowel disorders (N=25)4

Food Number (Percentage)
Spicy Foods 17 (68%)
Cow’s milk 14 (56%)
Pizza 13 (52%)
Fried foods 12 (48%)
Deep-fried foods 11 (44%)
Fast foods 10 (40%)
Sodas 10 (40%)
Cheese 10 (40%)
Ice cream 9 (36%)
Salsa 9 (35%)

Despite these clinical challenges, dietary intervention studies in children with functional bowel disorders have demonstrated efficacy (see below).

Carbohydrate Malabsorption

Malabsorption of individual carbohydrates (such as lactose) have been proposed to worsen gastrointestinal symptoms in children with abdominal pain related functional bowel disorders for several decades.8,9 More recently, potential carbohydrates which may be malabsorbed and exacerbate gastrointestinal symptoms have been grouped together. Investigators at Monash University in Australia termed such carbohydrates fermentable oligosaccharides disaccharides monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP). FODMAP carbohydrates traditionally include lactose, fructose, galactans, fructans, and polyols. Common sources of FODMAP carbohydrates, their general structure, and factors related to their propensity for malabsorption may be found in Table 2.

Table 2:

Type and Sources of Fermentable Oligosaccharides Disaccharides Monosaccharides and Polyols

Carbohydrate Structure Factors related to Malabsorption Common Food Examples
Lactose Disaccharide Lactase enzyme expression diminishes over time in majority of world’s population Cow’s milk, cheese and other dairy products
Fructose Monosaccharide Passive absorption related to GLUT2 and GLUT5 transporters Apples, pears, honey
Fructans Oligosaccharide made of fructose polymers Lack of human hydrolases; poorly absorbed Wheat, onions, rye
Galactans Oligosaccharide composed of galactose polymers Lack of human hydrolases; poorly absorbed Beans, legumes, asparagus
Sorbitol Sugar alcohol Lack of human hydrolases; passive absorption Apricots, cherries, pears

One randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with IBS found significantly higher symptom severity scores with fructose, fructans, or a combination of fructose and fructans the two versus glucose (placebo).10 A double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial identified a subset of children with IBS who were particularly sensitive (increase abdominal pain frequency) when challenged with fructans.11

Physiologic Effects of Malabsorbed Carbohydrates (Figure 1)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Physiologic effects of malabsorbed carbohydrates.

Malabsorbed carbohydrates have a direct physiologic effect on the gastrointestinal tract; these effects include both increased osmotic activity (particularly in the small bowel) and fermentation with gas production.12 These physiologic effects subsequently lead to gut luminal distention. In those with functional bowel disorders, this luminal distention may lead to symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, flatus, and changes in bowel habits.

Though FODMAP carbohydrates are grouped together, each malabsorbed carbohydrate may have a more pronounced physiologic effect in one area (e.g. small bowel water content) versus another. Using magnetic resonance imaging, fructose has been shown to significantly increase small bowel water content in both healthy adults and those with IBS.12,13 The increase in small bowel water content is greater with fructose as compared to fructans. In contrast, fructans increase overall hydrogen production and luminal (particularly colonic) gas distention in both health adults and adults with IBS. This gas production effect is higher with fructans as compared to fructose.12,13 When comparing adults with IBS versus healthy controls, the amount of both small bowel water content increase and colonic distention which occurred did not differ between the two groups.13

Other mechanisms, though not well elucidated, may also play a role in carbohydrate malabsorption related exacerbation in those with functional bowel disorders. Fermentation of carbohydrates by the gut microbiome leads to the creation of several metabolites including short chain fatty acids. Short chain fatty acids may have physiological effects including: alteration of local ion secretion, changes in colonic motility, and activation of colonic mast cells.14 Mast cells and their mediators (including histamine) have been associated with increased visceral nociception in both adults and children with functional bowel disorders.15,16 Potential support for this mechanism can be found in a randomized controlled trial in adults with IBS demonstrating urinary metabolite profiles differed between those who were instructed to follow a low FODMAP diet versus those who were instructed to follow a high FODMAP diet.17 In those assigned to a low FODMAP diet, the amount of histamine decreased significantly after the dietary intervention.17 Further studies are needed to investigate additional potential carbohydrate related mechanisms in childhood functional bowel disorders.

Factors related to carbohydrate malabsorption and subsequent gastrointestinal symptom exacerbation

Several factors may play a role in determining whether a FODMAP carbohydrate will exacerbate symptoms. These include: 1) the amount of carbohydrate ingested; 2) ingestion of the carbohydrate with a meal which in turn affects transit time to the colon; 3) small intestinal enzymatic (e.g. lactase for lactose ingestion) activity; 4) whether the meal contains microorganisms with enzymes capable of breaking down the carbohydrate; 5) colonic microbiome at time of carbohydrate ingestion and subsequent adaptation response to one’s diet, and 6) host factors such as the presence or absence of either low-grade gut inflammation and/or visceral hypersensitivity.

Amount of carbohydrate ingested

Though primarily derived from adult studies, data on lactose intolerance has clearly identified a relationship between the amount ingested and subsequent symptom generation. One study in healthy adults with lactose maldigestion challenged the subjects with different lactose amounts (0, 2, 6, 12, and 20 g).18 The subjects tolerated doses of up to 6 g (representing 120 mL of milk), but symptoms began to emerge at 12 g.18 Similar findings were noted in adults challenged with increasing quantities of lactose; the severity of symptoms was primarily dependent on the amount of lactose present.19 However certain individuals with possible functional bowel disorders appeared to be more sensitive.19 The exact amount of lactose required to induce symptoms in children with functional bowel disorders is unknown.

Beyond lactose the relationship between the amount of carbohydrate ingested and subsequent symptoms has been well established. Increasing amounts of fructose has been shown to worsen gastrointestinal symptoms in children with functional abdominal pain.9 Similarly in adults with IBS, increasing the amount of ingested fructose and fructans is associated with more severe gastrointestinal symptoms.10

Ingestion of the carbohydrate with a meal/ transit time

Ingestion of a potentially malabsorbed carbohydrate with a meal may increase the amount threshold required for symptom induction. One study in adults with lactose intolerance found the dosage threshold prior to symptoms increased up to 18 g of lactose when other nutrients were concomitantly ingested.20 Another study found that the severity of symptoms following lactose ingestion was reduced with consumption of food.21 Moreover, based on breath hydrogen production, lactose given with a meal had more prolonged overall transit time before reaching the colon.21

Meals composed of various carbohydrates may have variable effects on absorption. This has been seen in particular with fructose. Concomitant ingestion of fructose with glucose appears to facilitate fructose absorption through GLUT5.22 However, concomitant ingestion of fructose with sorbitol can worsen overall fructose absorption and decrease the amount of fructose required to cause symptoms.23 Further studies evaluating meals of various carbohydrate composition in children with functional bowel disorders are needed.

Small intestinal enzyme activity

Small intestinal enzymatic activity is required to hydrolyze certain carbohydrates which are larger than monosaccharides in order to facilitate absorption. For example, lactose is hydrolyzed by the enzyme lactase. Lactase is a β-galactosidase found on the tips of the villi of the small intestine which hydrolyzes lactose into two monosaccharides: galactose and glucose. These monosaccharides are then absorbed by the small intestine.

In humans, lactase activity is at its peak at the time of birth. However, lactase activity begins to decrease in early childhood in approximately 70% of humans so that by adulthood lactase activity is very low or undetectable.24 Approximately 30% of the world’s population has lactase persistence whereby lactase activity remains beyond weaning and into adulthood.25 Those with lactase persistence are able to continue to hydrolyze lactose well. Lactase persistence is a genetic trait which has been associated with at least five independent functional single nucleotide variants in a regulatory region upstream of the lactase gene.26 In children undergoing endoscopy, lactase activity and lactase mRNA expression from duodenal biopsies correlated strongly with one of the single nucleotide variant (−13910) genotypes.27

Decreased intestinal enzymatic activity may be involved in the malabsorption of other carbohydrates in those with functional bowel disorders beyond lactose. Sucrose and starch are normally easily hydrolyzed and absorbed in the small intestine through the activity of sucrase-isomaltase and maltase-glucoamylase.28 However, in children with functional abdominal pain disorders undergoing upper endoscopy, small intestinal carbohydrate enzyme deficiencies related to sucrose (sucrase activity) and/or starch (maltase activity) digestion have been identified in ≥20%.29,30 Further studies elucidating the potential role of sucrose and/or starch malabsorption in children with functional bowel disorders are needed.

Similar to lactase deficiency, sucrose/starch small intestinal enzyme deficiencies may have a genetic component. In one adult IBS study, functional variants in the sucrase-isomaltase gene were associated with an increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome.31 In a recently published abstract, children with functional bowel disorders (vs. a large population reference database) were found to have an increased prevalence of pathogenic sucrase-isomaltase gene variants.32 Whether these genetic components are associated with sucrose and/or starch malabsorption remains to be determined.

Meal contains microorganisms with enzymes capable of breaking down the carbohydrate

Microorganisms have the capacity to metabolize carbohydrates, and many microorganisms can metabolize carbohydrates which humans cannot.33 Subjects who were fed dairy-based yogurts with viable microbial cultures containing beta-galactosidase activity (versus pasteurized yogurts) have demonstrated fewer signs of lactose malabsorption.34 A recent systematic review identified eight probiotic strains which have been studied to ameliorate lactose intolerance either alone or within milk-related products.35 Of these Bifidobacterium animalis appeared to be the most researched and effective strain.35

Colonic microbiome at time of carbohydrate ingestion and subsequent dietary adaptation

The gut microbiome appears to have a potential role within the paradigm of carbohydrate malabsorption and subsequent development of gastrointestinal symptoms. Within a randomized double blind crossover trial of a low FODMAP vs. traditional American childhood diet in children with IBS, those children who had a 50% decrease in abdominal pain frequency on the low FODMAP diet (Responders) had a different microbiome composition as compared to those who did not achieve this level of improvement.36 Specifically, Responders were enriched in both saccharolytic bacteria (including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides and Ruminococcaceae) and two Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes orthologues related to carbohydrate metabolism.36 Though with mixed results, studies in adults with IBS have also identified microbiome composition as a potential predictor of response to a low FODMAP diet.37,38

Changes in the gut microbiome related to either chronic carbohydrate malabsorption or carbohydrate restriction may also play a role. In a small study of adults with lactose intolerance, lactose supplementation for 10 days both increased fecal microbiome β-galactosidase activity and decreased lactose-related gastrointestinal symptoms.18 In children and adults with IBS, FODMAP restriction has been found to alter both gut microbiome composition.17,39,40 In addition FODMAP restriction alters fecal and urinary metabolite profiles.17,39 The relationship of these gut microbiome related changes and relationship to gastrointestinal symptoms remains to be determined.

Host Factors

Host factors may also play a role in symptom generation in those with functional bowel disorders. Adults with lactose intolerance (vs. those who did not develop gastrointestinal symptoms after malabsorbing lactose) had increased low-grade small bowel and colonic inflammation (including increased mast cells).41 Though an association of carbohydrate intolerance and low-grade gut inflammation has not been made in children, children with IBS (vs. healthy controls) were found to have increased fecal calprotectin (a marker of inflammation).42

Visceral hypersensitivity may also play a role in determining whether a host develops symptoms with carbohydrate malabsorption. Increased visceral hypersensitivity was identified in adults with functional bowel disorders who developed symptoms after ingesting lactose and lactulose.41,43 Children with functional bowel disorders may also have increased visceral hypersensitivity.44

Carbohydrate Malabsorption Related Therapies in Children with Functional Bowel Disorders

Carbohydrate malabsorption related therapies in subjects with functional bowel disorders often attempt to address one or more of the factors delineated above which are associated with subsequent symptom generation.

Single carbohydrate restriction trials

Though lactose restriction for children with functional bowel disorders may be commonly used in the clinical practice setting, the majority of studies supporting this practice are uncontrolled.45 The only two randomized control trials evaluating the need for lactose restriction in children with functional abdominal pain were negative.45

In comparison, fructose restriction alone is more strongly supported than for lactose. One prospective randomized controlled trial in children with abdominal pain related functional bowel disorders compared a two week fructose-restricted diet versus no dietary intervention.46 Those on the fructose-restricted diet had less severe pain. However, they did not have a decrease in pain frequency. The authors found that the improvement on the restricted fructose diet occurred irrespective of results from fructose hydrogen breath testing.46

Low FODMAP Diet

As an alternative strategy to restricting single carbohydrates in children with functional bowel disorders, the entire group of FODMAP carbohydrates may be restricted simultaneously. A restricted (or low) FODMAP diet occurs in three phases: comprehensive FODMAP restriction; FODMAP re-introduction (during which individual FODMAP carbohydrates are used to determine which specific FODMAP carbohydrates are associated with symptoms); and FODMAP diet personalization (during which the subject tailors the low FODMAP diet to primarily avoid the FODMAP triggers that have been previously identified).47 Working with a registered dietitian is strongly recommended to help provide appropriate education (e.g. alternatives to FODMAP carbohydrates) and guide personalization of the subject’s diet.

Several randomized controlled studies in adults with IBS have demonstrated efficacy of a low FODMAP diet.17,40 The studies have included both those which provided the foods to subjects and those which relied on dietitian education to follow the low FODMAP diet. In children with IBS, a randomized, double blind, crossover study found that a low FODMAP diet decreased abdominal pain frequency.36

Selective prebiotic supplementation

In a randomized double-blind multi-site placebo-controlled trial, adults with lactose intolerance were challenged with either a short-chain galacto-oligosaccharide or placebo.48 The short-chain galacto-oligosaccharide increased the relative abundance of lactose-fermenting Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, and Lactobacillus: This correlated with improved clinical lactose tolerance.48 Whether similar strategies can be employed for other malabsorbed carbohydrates remains to be determined.

Enzyme supplementation

Enzyme therapy to help prevent a carbohydrate from being malabsorbed has been trialed for several decades – primarily with lactose. In adults with either lactose intolerance or IBS, addition of exogenous β-galactosidases (from various microorganisms) to ameliorate lactose intolerance following a lactose challenge has been shown to be successful.49,50 Similarly in children with lactose intolerance enrolled in a randomized trial, subjects given lactase (versus placebo) had a decrease in clinical symptoms.51

Enzyme supplementation has also been employed as a strategy for other malabsorbed carbohydrates. In adults with fructose intolerance, the addition of xylose isomerase (which may convert fructose to glucose) during a fructose challenge both decreased breath hydrogen production and ameliorated symptoms.52 In adults with IBS who were sensitive to galactans, full dose (300 galactosidic units) α-galactosidase (versus either half dose or placebo) co-ingestion with a diet high in galactans ameliorated gastrointestinal symptoms.53 Similar enzyme supplementation trials using these and/or other enzymes in children with functional bowel disorders are needed.

FIBER SUPPLEMENTATION

Insufficient dietary fiber intake has been associated with childhood functional bowel disorders.54,55 Dietary fiber is composed of both soluble (water is able to be absorbed) and insoluble components. Soluble fiber therefore has the ability to maintain hydration of stool.56 Insoluble fiber may have the potential ability to mechanically stimulate and/or irritate the gut mucosa: This may induce a laxative effect through secretion of mucus and water resulting in more rapid colonic transit.56 The distinction regarding the classification of fiber is important as insoluble fiber (e.g. bran) has been shown to exacerbate gastrointestinal symptoms in adults with IBS.57

Studies related to fiber supplementation in childhood abdominal-pain related functional bowel disorders have reported mixed results. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial in children with functional abdominal pain disorders, Feldman et al. identified 10 g of corn fiber supplementation for 2 weeks was significantly more effective than placebo in decreasing abdominal pain frequency.58 Using a randomized, four week double-blind parallel design for four weeks in children with Rome III abdominal pain-related functional bowel disorders, Romano et al. demonstrated partially hydrolyzed guar gum (5 grams/day) was significantly more effective than placebo in improving in gastrointestinal symptoms.59 Shulman et al., in the largest fiber supplementation study in children with IBS to date, reported that psyllium fiber (6 grams for ages 7–11 years and 12 grams for ages 12–17 years) was significantly more effective at reducing abdominal pain frequency.60 The psyllium benefit occurred irrespective of several physiologic measures which were assessed including gut microbiome composition.60 Psyllium is a soluble fiber with high viscosity which is able to maintain its gel-like property; thereby, decreasing its fermentation by microorganisms while providing for increased water-holding capacity and regulation of stool form.56

In contrast to the studies suggesting fiber supplementation is helpful in childhood functional abdominal pain disorders, two other randomized placebo controlled studies did not demonstrate any benefit; one used psyllium (ispaghula husk) and the other glucomannan.61,62

SUMMARY

A large majority of children with functional bowel disorders have food induced symptoms. Malabsorbed carbohydrates may have both direct and microbiome-mediated physiologic effects. Several factors are associated with carbohydrate symptom generation including: 1) the amount ingested; 2) ingestion with a meal; 3) small intestinal enzymatic activity; 4) carbohydrate consumption with microorganisms capable of breaking down the carbohydrate; 5) gut microbiome, and 6) host factors. Several therapies may address carbohydrate malabsorption induced symptoms. These include dietary restriction of an individual offending carbohydrate or a more comprehensive restriction approach as seen in the low FODMAP diet. Additional approaches may include selective prebiotic, probiotic, and/or enzyme supplementation. Fiber supplementation may also be beneficial in children with functional bowel disorders.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hyams JS, Di Lorenzo C, Saps M, Shulman RJ, Staiano A, van Tilburg M. Functional Disorders: Children and Adolescents. Gastroenterology. February 15 2016;150:1456–1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Varni JW, Lane MM, Burwinkle TM, et al. Health-related quality of life in pediatric patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a comparative analysis. J Dev Behav Pediatr. December 2006;27(6):451–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms in childhood irritable bowel syndrome. Molecular and cellular pediatrics. December 2016;3(1):11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carlson MJ, Moore CE, Tsai CM, Shulman RJ, Chumpitazi BP. Child and parent perceived food-induced gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. March 2014;114(3):403–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chumpitazi BP, Weidler EM, Lu DY, Tsai CM, Shulman RJ. Self-Perceived Food Intolerances Are Common and Associated with Clinical Severity in Childhood Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. September 2016;116(9):1458–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reed-Knight B, Squires M, Chitkara DK, van Tilburg MA. Adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome report increased eating-associated symptoms, changes in dietary composition, and altered eating behaviors: a pilot comparison study to healthy adolescents. Neurogastroenterol Motil. December 2016;28(12):1915–1920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bohn L, Storsrud S, Tornblom H, Bengtsson U, Simren M. Self-reported food-related gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS are common and associated with more severe symptoms and reduced quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol. May 2013;108(5):634–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barr RG, Levine MD, Watkins JB. Recurrent abdominal pain of childhood due to lactose intolerance. N Engl J Med. June 28 1979;300(26):1449–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gomara RE, Halata MS, Newman LJ, et al. Fructose intolerance in children presenting with abdominal pain. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. September 2008;47(3):303–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shepherd SJ, Parker FC, Muir JG, Gibson PR. Dietary triggers of abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: randomized placebo-controlled evidence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. July 2008;6(7):765–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chumpitazi BP, McMeans AR, Vaughan A, et al. Fructans Exacerbate Symptoms in a Subset of Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. February 2018;16(2):219–225 e211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murray K, Wilkinson-Smith V, Hoad C, et al. Differential effects of FODMAPs (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols) on small and large intestinal contents in healthy subjects shown by MRI. Am J Gastroenterol. January 2014;109(1):110–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Major G, Pritchard S, Murray K, et al. Colon Hypersensitivity to Distension, Rather Than Excessive Gas Production, Produces Carbohydrate-Related Symptoms in Individuals With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. January 2017;152(1):124–133 e122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Depoortere I Taste receptors of the gut: emerging roles in health and disease. Gut. January 2014;63(1):179–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barbara G, Wang B, Stanghellini V, et al. Mast cell-dependent excitation of visceral-nociceptive sensory neurons in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):26–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Di Nardo G, Barbara G, Cucchiara S, et al. Neuroimmune interactions at different intestinal sites are related to abdominal pain symptoms in children with IBS. Neurogastroenterol Motil. February 2014;26(2):196–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McIntosh K, Reed DE, Schneider T, et al. FODMAPs alter symptoms and the metabolome of patients with IBS: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. July 2017;66(7):1241–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hertzler SR, Savaiano DA. Colonic adaptation to daily lactose feeding in lactose maldigesters reduces lactose intolerance. Am.J.Clin.Nutr. 1996;64:232–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gudmand-Hoyer E, Simony K. Individual sensitivity to lactose in lactose malabsorption. Am J Dig Dis. March 1977;22(3):177–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Annals of internal medicine. June 15 2010;152(12):797–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martini MC, Savaiano DA. Reduced intolerance symptoms from lactose consumed during a meal. Am J Clin Nutr. January 1988;47(1):57–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shepherd SJ, Gibson PR. Fructose malabsorption and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: guidelines for effective dietary management. J Am Diet Assoc. October 2006;106(10):1631–1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rumessen JJ, Gudmand-Hoyer E. Functional bowel disease: malabsorption and abdominal distress after ingestion of fructose, sorbitol, and fructose-sorbitol mixtures. Gastroenterology. September 1988;95(3):694–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Deng Y, Misselwitz B, Dai N, Fox M. Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Biological Mechanism and Dietary Management. Nutrients. September 2015;7(9):8020–8035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Curry A Archaeology: The milk revolution. Nature. August 01 2013;500(7460):20–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liebert A, Lopez S, Jones BL, et al. World-wide distributions of lactase persistence alleles and the complex effects of recombination and selection. Human genetics. November 2017;136(11–12):1445–1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baffour-Awuah NY, Fleet S, Montgomery RK, et al. Functional significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the lactase gene in diverse US patients and evidence for a novel lactase persistence allele at −13909 in those of European ancestry. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. February 2015;60(2):182–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Robayo-Torres CC, Quezada-Calvillo R, Nichols BL. Disaccharide digestion: clinical and molecular aspects. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. March 2006;4(3):276–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Karnsakul W, Luginbuehl U, Hahn D, et al. Disaccharidase activities in dyspeptic children: biochemical and molecular investigations of maltase-glucoamylase activity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. October 2002;35(4):551–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.El-Chammas K, Williams SE, Miranda A. Disaccharidase Deficiencies in Children With Chronic Abdominal Pain. JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. July 9 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Henstrom M, Diekmann L, Bonfiglio F, et al. Functional variants in the sucrase-isomaltase gene associate with increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. November 21 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chumpitazi BPLJ, Elser H, Cooper D, D’Amato M, Di Lorenzo C. Prevalence of Known Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency Gene Mutations in Children with Functional Abdominal Pain and/or Functional Diarrhea [abstract]. Gastroenterol. 2017;152(5):S646. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes. July-August 2012;3(4):289–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martini MC, Smith DE, Savaiano DA. Lactose digestion from flavored and frozen yogurts, ice milk, and ice cream by lactase-deficient persons. Am J Clin Nutr. October 1987;46(4):636–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oak SJ, Jha R. The effects of probiotics in lactose intolerance: A systematic review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. February 9 2018:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chumpitazi BP, Cope JL, Hollister EB, et al. Randomised clinical trial: gut microbiome biomarkers are associated with clinical response to a low FODMAP diet in children with the irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. August 2015;42(4):418–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Halmos EP, Christophersen CT, Bird AR, Shepherd SJ, Gibson PR, Muir JG. Diets that differ in their FODMAP content alter the colonic luminal microenvironment. Gut. January 2015;64(1):93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bennet SMP, Bohn L, Storsrud S, et al. Multivariate modelling of faecal bacterial profiles of patients with IBS predicts responsiveness to a diet low in FODMAPs. Gut. April 17 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chumpitazi BP, Hollister EB, Oezguen N, et al. Gut microbiota influences low fermentable substrate diet efficacy in children with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Microbes. March-April 2014;5(2):165–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Halmos EP, Power VA, Shepherd SJ, Gibson PR, Muir JG. A Diet Low in FODMAPs Reduces Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. January 2014;146(1):67–75 e65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang J, Fox M, Cong Y, et al. Lactose intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome patients with diarrhoea: the roles of anxiety, activation of the innate mucosal immune system and visceral sensitivity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. February 2014;39(3):302–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shulman RJ, Eakin MN, Czyzewski DI, Jarrett M, Ou CN. Increased Gastrointestinal Permeability and Gut Inflammation in Children with Functional Abdominal Pain and Irritable Bowel Syndrome. J.Pediatr. 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Le Neve B, Brazeilles R, Derrien M, et al. Lactulose Challenge Determines Visceral Sensitivity and Severity of Symptoms in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. October 19 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Di Lorenzo C, Youssef NN, Sigurdsson L, Scharff L, Griffiths J, Wald A. Visceral hyperalgesia in children with functional abdominal pain. J Pediatr. December 2001;139(6):838–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Dietary Carbohydrates and Childhood Functional Abdominal Pain. Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2016;68 Suppl 1:8–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wirth S, Klodt C, Wintermeyer P, et al. Positive or negative fructose breath test results do not predict response to fructose restricted diet in children with recurrent abdominal pain: results from a prospective randomized trial. Klinische Padiatrie. September 2014;226(5):268–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Whelan K, Martin LD, Staudacher HM, Lomer MCE. The low FODMAP diet in the management of irritable bowel syndrome: an evidence-based review of FODMAP restriction, reintroduction and personalisation in clinical practice. J Hum Nutr Diet. January 15 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Azcarate-Peril MA, Ritter AJ, Savaiano D, et al. Impact of short-chain galactooligosaccharides on the gut microbiome of lactose-intolerant individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. January 17 2017;114(3):E367–E375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Solomons NW, Guerrero AM, Torun B. Effective in vivo hydrolysis of milk lactose by beta-galactosidases in the presence of solid foods. Am J Clin Nutr. February 1985;41(2):222–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lisker R, Solomons NW, Perez Briceno R, Ramirez Mata M. Lactase and placebo in the management of the irritable bowel syndrome: A double-blind, cross-over study. Am.J.Gastroenterol. 1989;84:756–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Medow MS, Thek KD, Newman LJ, Berezin S, Glassman MS, Schwarz SM. Beta-galactosidase tablets in the treatment of lactose intolerance in pediatrics. Am J Dis Child. November 1990;144(11):1261–1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Komericki P, Akkilic-Materna M, Strimitzer T, Weyermair K, Hammer HF, Aberer W. Oral xylose isomerase decreases breath hydrogen excretion and improves gastrointestinal symptoms in fructose malabsorption - a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. November 2012;36(10):980–987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tuck CJ, Taylor KM, Gibson PR, Barrett JS, Muir JG. Increasing Symptoms in Irritable Bowel Symptoms With Ingestion of Galacto-Oligosaccharides Are Mitigated by alpha-Galactosidase Treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. January 2018;113(1):124–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huang RC, Palmer LJ, Forbes DA. Prevalence and pattern of childhood abdominal pain in an Australian general practice. J.Paediatr.Child Health. 2000;36(4):349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Paulo AZ, Amancio OM, de Morais MB, Tabacow KM. Low-dietary fiber intake as a risk factor for recurrent abdominal pain in children. Eur J Clin Nutr. July 2006;60(7):823–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McRorie JW, Jr. Evidence-Based Approach to Fiber Supplements and Clinically Meaningful Health Benefits, Part 2: What to Look for and How to Recommend an Effective Fiber Therapy. Nutrition today. March 2015;50(2):90–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hebden JM, Blackshaw E, D’Amato M, Perkins AC, Spiller RC. Abnormalities of GI transit in bloated irritable bowel syndrome: effect of bran on transit and symptoms. Am.J.Gastroenterol. 2002;97(9):2315–2320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Feldman W, McGrath P, Hodgson C, Ritter H, Shipman RT. The use of dietary fiber in the management of simple, childhood, idiopathic, recurrent abdominal pain. Results in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Am.J.Dis.Child. 1985;139:1216–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Romano C, Comito D, Famiani A, Calamara S, Loddo I. Partially hydrolyzed guar gum in pediatric functional abdominal pain. World J Gastroenterol. January 14 2013;19(2):235–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shulman RJ, Hollister EB, Cain K, et al. Psyllium Fiber Reduces Abdominal Pain in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. May 2017;15(5):712–719 e714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Christensen MF. Recurrent abdominal pain and dietary fiber. Am J Dis Child. August 1986;140(8):738–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. May 28 2013;19(20):3062–3068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES