AJIT PADHY ORATION
Steven M. Larson, MSKCC, NY, USA
There is a major unmet need in oncology for better therapies for the common “solid” tumors of adult and childhood cancers such as colon, lung, breast, ovarian, neuroblastoma, sarcoma, and glioblastoma. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of human solid tumors has not achieved cures and even major responses have been few and far between.1 A common problem for RIT has been low therapeutic index (TI), aka radiation dose to tumor/radiation dose to radiosensitive organs, such as bone marrow and kidney.1
Since 2013, we have focused on pre-targeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) to improve TI in order to achieve cures of solid tumors in man. To achieve this goal, we established a collaboration with Dane Wittrup at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to study PRIT targeting GPA33, and with Nai Kong V. Cheung at MSK to study PRIT targeting GD2 and HER2. The PRIT was to be based on a modular bispecific anti-tumor/anti-hapten antibody format reported by the Wittrup Lab.2 Building on the antibody expertise of the Cheung Laboratory, sufficient quantities of these novel recombinant forms were manufactured and validated to begin the era of PRIT testing at MSK.
We chose to develop PRIT methodology as originally proposed by Reardan, Meares, and Goodwin et al. who described a highly novel, antibody-based radiohapten capture tumor targeting approach utilizing antibodies against metal chelates.3 We were particularly impressed by the refinement of the anti-chelate antibody sequence achieved by our MIT colleagues using affinity maturation to produce a pico-molar affinity (pM) radiohapten binding antibody called C825 to bind a radiohapten, benzyl DOTA lanthanides.4 We refer to this approach as “DOTA-PRIT.” Useful characteristics of DOTA-PRIT include excellent post-injection contrast between tumor uptake and other tissues, as well as complete and rapid excretion of non-tumor-bound radiohapten through the kidneys, without renal retention of radioactivity.5,6
DOTA-PRIT is a three-step method in which the treatment cycle separates the anti-tumor antibody targeting from the targeting of radioactivity. First, a bifunctional antibody (bf Ab) is created in the IgG-scFv format, which has two antibody specificities on the same molecule for (a) tumor antigen binding and (b) radiohapten binding. The non-radioactive bf Ab is injected, followed by an interval of usually 24-48 hours to optimize tumor uptake on the cognate antigen. Once uptake is considered optimal, a clearing agent is administered, which selectively clears away any non-reacted antibody in blood and non-tumor tissues. The clearing agent is a high-molecular-weight dextran chelated to a non-radioactive DOTA lanthanide hapten and the dextran-bound antibody is cleared into the hepatocytes of the liver. Clearance is sufficiently rapid that within a few hours the radiohapten can be given, which is either bound within the tumor or quickly excreted through the kidneys.
At MSK, we set a high bar for DOTA-PRIT to achieve histologic “cures” of solid tumors, with minimal, totally resolving toxicity in radiosensitive target tissues at the histologic level. We next developed a definition for systemic RIT “success”; namely, a series of targeting benchmarks for the “sweet spot”—the point at which there is a balance between the essential linked features of safe and curative RIT of human tumors: tumoricidal radiation dose to tumor and non-toxic TI for target tissues. Based on tumor response and toxicity experience with other targeted radiotherapies, such as Iodine-131 treatment of thyroid cancer and Lutetium-177 and Yttrium-90 radiopeptide treatment of neuroendocrine tumors,1 we settled on a tumor targeting goal of ~100 Gy to tumor and non-toxic TIs. Curative tumor dose >10,000 cGy; renal dose <1,500 cGy; ~7-10 TI; bone marrow dose <150 cGy; ~40-100 TI; and intestinal mucosa dose <250 cGy; 40-60 TI.1
We began our studies of DOTA-PRIT by selecting two anti-tumor antibodies with excellent tumor antigen targeting properties based on past human experience. 3F8 binds to the ganglioside antigen GD2, common in neuroblastoma, glioma, sarcoma, and small cell lung cancer. The A33 antibody—which binds to the glycoprotein A33 antigen GPA33, a component of tight junctions—is commonly expressed in colon and small bowel cancer (~95%) and a subset of pancreatic and gastric cancers. Both antibody antigen systems have long retention in the tumor cell membrane and internalization is considered minimal. Both systems had bf Abs created, and high TIs were observed, due to excellent targeting of Lutetium-177 and Yttrium-86.
In the GD2 system, we observed 100% complete responses (CRs) of neuroblastoma xenografts with 80% histologic cures, based on total tumor radiation-absorbed doses of 3,400 cGy to tumor and “safe” TIs (Tu/B = 142; Tu/K = 23).8 In the A33 system, three cycles were also required for cure, with total tumor doses of ~10,000 cGy and 100% CRs and cures, with safe TIs (Tu/B = 73; Tu/K = 12) and no histologically evident toxicity in target organs.7 We validated SPECT/CT imaging for theranostics: The radiation-absorbed dose, determined by biodistribution studies in mice, when compared to contemporaneous non-invasive SPECT imaging, agreed to within 7%.7
The multistep targeting system was not thought to be useful for tumor antigen systems such as HER2, which are readily internalized from the cell membrane. HER2 is expressed in breast, ovarian, and lung cancers and in gastroesophageal junction tumors. Contrary to expectations, we discovered excellent efficacy of a three-cycle anti-HER2-DOTA-PRIT, which delivered a total radiation dose to tumor of 6,600 cGy (Tu/B = 28; Tu/K = 7), with 100% CRs, a majority of histologic cure (5/8, 62.5%), and no recurrence of microscopic residual disease (3/8) at 85 d.9
We have now extended the DOTA-PRIT method to enable RIT with alpha particles (α-particles). We focused development on Actinium-225 since its physical half-life of 10 d makes it well suited for DOTA-PRIT. We named this approach “proteus-DOTA” (Pr-DOTA), which contains a DOTA-chelated non-radioactive Lutetium-175 as the high-affinity “handle” or binding site cognate to the hapten binding antibody on our specialized bf Abs. A second radiometal chelate is linked by poly-ethylene glycol. Pr-DOTA radiohapten forms (e.g., Actinium-225, indium-111) that have been studied so far exhibit the same renal excretion-driven pharmacodynamics in vivo as 177Lu-DOTA-PRIT.* Treatment of mice bearing human GPA33-expressing colorectal or GD2-expressing neuroblastoma xenografts with a single cycle of [225Ac]Pr-DOTA-PRIT led to significant tumor growth control, including CRs with no acute toxicity (manuscript in preparation).
SM Larson reports receiving commercial research grants from Genentech, Wilex, Telix and Regeneron; holding ownership interest/equity in Voreyda Theranostics Inc. and Elucida Oncology Inc, and holding stock in ImaginAb. SML is the inventor and owner of issued patents both currently unlicensed and licensed by MSK to Samus Therapeutics . YMABS Therapeutics, Inc. and Elucida Oncology Inc. SML is or has been consultant to Cynvec, Eli Lilly, Prescient, Advanced Innovative Partners, Gerson Lehrman, Progenics and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have no competing interests.
SCIENTIFIC SESSION 3: RADIOEMBOLISATION AND LIVER THERAPIES
Moderators: Patrick Flamen, Brussels, Belgium and Aviral Singh, Bad Berka, Germany
Reference
-
1.Larson S. M, Carrasquillo J. A, Cheung N. K, Press O. W. Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:347–360. doi: 10.1038/nrc3925. doi:10.1038/nrc3925 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
2.Orcutt K. D. A modular IgG-scFv bispecific antibody topology. Protein Eng Des Sel. 23:221–228. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzp077. doi:10.1093/protein/gzp077 (2010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
3.Reardan D. T. Antibodies against metal chelates. Nature. 1985;316:265–268. doi: 10.1038/316265a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
4.Orcutt K. D. Engineering an antibody with picomolar affinity to DOTA chelates of multiple radionuclides for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy and imaging. Nucl Med Biol. 38:223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.08.013. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.08.013 (2011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
5.Orcutt K. D, Rhoden J. J, Ruiz-Yi B, Frangioni J. V, Wittrup K. D. Effect of small-molecule-binding affinity on tumor uptake in vivo: a systematic study using a pretargeted bispecific antibody. Mol Cancer Ther. 11:1365–1372. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0764. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0764 (2012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
6.Orcutt K. D, Nasr K. A, Whitehead D. G, Frangioni J. V, Wittrup K. D. Biodistribution and clearance of small molecule hapten chelates for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy. Mol Imaging Biol. 13:215–221. doi: 10.1007/s11307-010-0353-6. doi:10.1007/s11307-010-0353-6 (2011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
7.Cheal S. M. Curative Multicycle Radioimmunotherapy Monitored by Quantitative SPECT/CT-Based Theranostics, Using Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting Strategy in Colorectal Cancer. J Nucl Med. 58:1735–1742. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193250. doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.193250 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
8.Cheal S. M. Evaluation of glycodendron and synthetically modified dextran clearing agents for multistep targeting of radioisotopes for molecular imaging and radioimmunotherapy. Molecular pharmaceutics. 11:400–416. doi: 10.1021/mp4003128. doi:10.1021/mp4003128 (2014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
9.Cheal S. Comparative efficacy and toxicity of Lu-177-vs Y-90-theranostic anti-HER2/anti-DOTA(metal) pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (anti-HER2 DOT-APRIT) of HER2- expressing breast cancer xenografts with curative intent. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2017;58 [Google Scholar]