Skip to main content
Blood Transfusion logoLink to Blood Transfusion
editorial
. 2019 Feb 6;17(2):87–88. doi: 10.2450/2019.0269-18

Implementation of a patient blood management programme in obstetrics: let’s do it!

Massimo Franchini 1,2,, Giancarlo M Liumbruno 1
PMCID: PMC6476737  PMID: 31013248

Patient Blood Management (PBM) consists in the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical procedures aimed at maintaining haemoglobin concentration, optimising haemostasis, and minimising blood loss to improve patients’ outcomes13. According to this definition, the approach to PBM is multidisciplinary and addressed to each individual in whom significant blood losses are expected and where transfusion of blood products is part of the established treatment4. The PBM patient-centred model is based on three pillars: 1) optimising the endogenous erythropoiesis; 2) minimising bleeding and blood loss; and 3) optimising the physiological reserve of anaemia. It typically includes both transfusional and non-transfusional measures5.

Although a PBM programme is best known in the perioperative setting, particularly in patients undergoing elective major surgical procedures614, it can also be applied to any procedure likely to result in excessive bleeding requiring the use of blood products. A dramatic example is offered by postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), one of the most important obstetric emergencies15. Although over the last decades mortality rates from PPH have greatly declined in the developed world, it remains a leading cause of death elsewhere16. A recent systematic analysis from the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that PPH accounts for almost one-fifth of maternal deaths worldwide, ranging from 8% of all maternal deaths in developed regions to nearly 30% in East Asia and North Africa17. In a recent population-base cohort study conducted in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, obstetric haemorrhage was the most common cause of maternal deaths18. In spite of the therapeutic advances made in its management19,20, massive PPH remains a life-threatening condition, and one of the most difficult challenges for the obstetrician and gynaecologists.

In this scenario, in the current issue of Blood Transfusion, Muñoz and Colleagues21 have published a consensus statement on the prevention and treatment of PPH. One of the strengths of this report is that the recommendations included are the result of the close collaboration between the most important societies in this field, i.e. the Network for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management, Haemostasis and Thrombosis (NATA), the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). This, along with the rigorous method adopted (the GRADE system), makes this publication one of great scientific importance. Another important feature of this consensus paper is its multidisciplinary approach, having been developed by physicians experts in the various disciplines involved in the complex management of PPH (i.e., obstetrics, anaesthesia, haematology, and transfusion medicine). The resulting document is very complete, very up-to-date, and of great practical value. In particular, all the various causes involved in the aetiology of PPH, and the related measures to adopt for PPH prevention and treatment, are carefully analysed.

In conclusion, we are strongly convinced that this paper will be an important tool in daily clinical practice and we recommend that it be adopted by every Obstetric Unit to implement effective management of this severe obstetric complication.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Professor Marilyn Scopes (Italian Foundation for Research on Anaemia and Haemoglobinopathies, Genoa, Italy) for her precious assistance with language editing and proofreading, and Mrs. Martina Amerini (Italian Foundation for Research on Anaemia and Haemoglobinopathies, Genoa, Italy) for general administrative support and assistance in writing this Editorial.

Footnotes

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

GML is the Editor-in-Chief of Blood Transfusion and consequently this manuscript has undergone additional external review. MF declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Franchini M, Muñoz M. Towards the implementation of patient blood management across Europe. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:292–3. doi: 10.2450/2017.0078-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vaglio S, Gentili S, Marano G, et al. The Italian regulatory Guidelines for the implementation of patient blood management. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:325–8. doi: 10.2450/2017.0060-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muñoz M, Gómez-Ramírez S, Besser M, et al. Current misconceptions in diagnosis and management of iron deficiency. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:422–37. doi: 10.2450/2017.0113-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Franchini M, Marano G, Mengoli C, et al. Red blood cell transfusion policy: a critical literature review. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:307–17. doi: 10.2450/2017.0059-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Franchini M, Liumbruno GM. The key role of tranexamic acid in Patient Blood Management programmes. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:471–2. doi: 10.2450/2018.0177-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Muñoz M, Franchini M, Liumbruno GM. The post-operative management of anaemia: more efforts are needed. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:324–5. doi: 10.2450/2018.0036-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muñoz M, Gómez-Ramírez S, Liumbruno GM. Peri-operative anaemia management in major orthopaedic surgery: the need to find a pathway. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:289–91. doi: 10.2450/2017.0296-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bisbe E, Basora M, Colomina MJ Spanish Best Practice in Peri-operative Anaemia Optimisation Panel. Peri-operative treatment of anaemia in major orthopaedic surgery: a practical approach from Spain. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:296–306. doi: 10.2450/2017.0177-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Basora M, Pereira A, Coca M, Tió M, Lozano L. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ferric carboxymaltose in pre-operative haemoglobin optimisation in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:438–42. doi: 10.2450/2018.0031-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Franchini M, Mengoli C, Marietta M, et al. Safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:36–43. doi: 10.2450//2017.0219-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Perèz-Jimeno N, Muñoz M, Mateo J, Mayoral AP, Herrera A. Efficacy of topical tranexamic acid within a blood saving program for primary total hip arthroplasty: a pragmatic, open-label randomised study. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:490–7. doi: 10.2450/2018.0133-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Franchini M, Cruciani M, Mengoli C, et al. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma as conservative treatment in orthopaedics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:502–13. doi: 10.2450/2018.0111-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laso-Morales MJ, Vives R, Gómez-Ramírez S, Pallisera-Lloveras A, Pontes C. Intravenous iron administration for post-operative anaemia management after colorectal cancer surgery in clinical practice: a single-centre, retrospective study. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:338–342. doi: 10.2450/2018.0004-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Muñoz M, Gómez-Ramírez S, Campos A, Ruiz J, Liumbruno GM. Pre-operative anaemia: prevalence, consequences and approaches to management. Blood Transfus. 2015;13:370–9. doi: 10.2450/2015.0014-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Henriquez DDCA, Bloemenkamp KWM, van der Bom JG. Management of postpartum hemorrhage: how to improve maternal outcomes? J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:1523–34. doi: 10.1111/jth.14200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1736–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) mortality study group. Population-based rates, timing, and causes of maternal deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1297–e1308. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30385-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Franchini M, Mengoli C, Cruciani M, et al. Safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid for prevention of obstetric haemorrhage: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:329–37. doi: 10.2450/2018.0026-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Der Linde R, Favaloro EJ. Tranexamic acid to prevent post-partum haemorrhage. Blood Transfus. 2018;16:321–3. doi: 10.2450/2018.0067-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Muñoz M, Stensballe J, Ducloy-Bouthors A-S, et al. Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage – NATA consensus statement. Blood Transfus. 2019;17:112–36. doi: 10.2450/2019.0245-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Blood Transfusion are provided here courtesy of SIMTI Servizi

RESOURCES