Abstract
27-hydroxycholesterol (27HC) is a purported, novel endogenous SERM. In animal models, 27HC has an anti-estrogen effect in bone, and 17β-estradiol mitigates this effect. 27HC in relation to fracture risk has not been investigated in humans. Depending on the level of bioavailable 17β-estradiol (bioE2), 27HC may increase fracture risk in postmenopausal women and modify the fracture risk reduction from menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). To test these a priori hypotheses, we conducted a nested case-cohort study of 868 postmenopausal women within the Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Therapy trials (WHI-HT). The WHI-HT tested conjugated equine estrogens versus placebo and separately conjugated equine estrogens plus progestin versus placebo. Fracture cases were 442 women who had an adjudicated incident hip or clinical vertebral fracture during the WHI-HT follow-up. The sub-cohort included 430 women randomly selected at WHI-HT baseline, 4 of whom had a subsequent fracture. Of 868 women, 266 cases and 219 non-cases were assigned to the placebo arms. Cox models estimated hazard ratios for incident fracture in relation to pre-randomization circulating levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio. Models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, total cholesterol, bioE2, sex hormone-binding globulin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, diabetes, osteoporosis, prior MHT use, BMI, falls history and prior fracture. In women assigned to placebo arms, those in the middle and the highest tertiles of 27HC/bioE2 had an up to 1.9-fold (95% confidence intervals: 1.25–2.99) greater risk of fracture than women in the lowest tertile. In women assigned to MHT arms, fracture risk increased with continuous 27HC/bioE2 levels but not with categorical levels. 27HC levels alone were not associated with fracture risk. 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 did not modify the fracture risk reduction from MHT. In postmenopausal women, circulating levels of 27HC relative to bioE2 may identify those at increased risk of fracture.
Keywords: 27-hydroxycholesterol, fracture, postmenopausal women, oxysterol, estradiol
INTRODUCTION
Approximately one in two non-Hispanic white women ages 50 or older experience a fragility fracture during her lifetime.(1) The link between bone loss and low estrogen, the most established risk factor for fracture in postmenopausal women, was reported as early as 1941.(2) Low circulating endogenous 17β-estradiol (E2), including free E2 and bioavailable E2 (bioE2), are associated with increased risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.(3–6) Short-acting exogenous estrogens, e.g. conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), prevent bone mineral loss at the hip and spine.(7, 8) In the Women’s Health Initiative hormone therapy (WHI-HT) trials, CEE reduced the risk of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, the majority of whom had no diagnosis of low bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis.(9–11) Furthermore, CEE provides comparable protection against hip fracture for postmenopausal women, regardless of circulating levels of total E2 or bioE2.(12)
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are pharmacological agents that act at the estrogen receptor (ER) to modulate estrogen’s effects systemically but differentially as a relative agonist or antagonist, depending on tissue site, including bone.(13) 27-hydroxycholesterol (27HC) is a purported novel endogenous SERM identified in mice.(14–19) In animal and in vitro studies, 27HC functions as a negative ER regulator that reduces the favorable effects of estrogen in bone;(15, 16) an ER antagonist in vascular endothelium and smooth muscle cells;(17) a partial agonist in ER-positive breast cancer in mice;(18, 19) and recently an ER agonist in prostate cancer cell.(20) 27HC is the most abundant circulating oxysterol in humans and a primary cholesterol metabolite produced by the action of the enzyme CYP27A1.(14, 21) Circulating levels of 27HC have shown to be regulated by vitamin D supplements in women with breast cancer.(22)
To our knowledge, the effect of 27HC on the risk of fragility fracture in humans has not been reported. Based on findings in animal studies,(15) we postulated that an effect of 27HC on bone depends on the amount of estrogen present in women, since 27HC is likely to compete with E2 for ER-binding and may thereby reduce the protective effect of estrogen and increase fracture risk. In this study, we hypothesized that 1) postmenopausal women who have a high circulating level of 27HC relative to bioE2 (27HC/bioE2 molar ratio) have an increased risk of incident fracture than those who do not, and 2) the circulating levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio modify the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on fracture risk in postmenopausal women. To test these hypotheses, we measured baseline (pre-randomization) plasma 27HC levels in a prospective case-cohort study of 868 postmenopausal women nested within the WHI-HT trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Therapy (WHI-HT) Trials
The detailed information of study design, survey methodology, laboratory techniques, and major findings for two WHI-HT trials have been published.(9, 10, 23) The WHI-HT trials consisted of 27,347 postmenopausal women aged 50 years or older (mean 63 years). Women with hysterectomy were randomly assigned to receive 0.625 mg CEE or placebo in the “E-alone trial”,(9) and women with intact uteri were randomly assigned to receive 0.625 mg CEE plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate or placebo in the “E+P trial”.(10) Hip and clinical vertebral fractures were secondary outcomes of WHI-HT trials, adjudicated by centrally trained local physician adjudicators who reviewed radiology reports.(24) Hip fractures underwent a second central adjudication. The agreement between two adjudications was 94%.(25, 26) Effects of the two MHT interventions compared with placebo groups on the risk of such fractures were evaluated during a mean follow-up of 7.2 years (E-alone trial) and 5.6 years (E+P trial).(9–11)
Prospective Case-Cohort Study Nested within WHI-HT Trials
We conducted a prospective case-cohort study of 868 postmenopausal nested within the WHI-HT trials; 485 women were randomized to the placebo arms and 383 women to the MHT arms. We randomly selected 430 women who had had sufficient volumes of pre-randomization plasma sample as the random sub-cohort, irrespective of whether they subsequently had a fracture (Figure 1). The fracture cases included 442 women who had had an incident hip fracture (all 242 such women) or an incident clinical vertebral fracture (200 randomly selected from 231 such women) during the WHI-HT trials. Among these 442 women with incident fracture, 4 women were also sampled into the random sub-cohort. Therefore, 426 of 430 women in the sub-cohort who did not experience an incident hip or clinical vertebral fracture were analyzed as “non-cases”. Among 485 women randomized to the placebo arms, 266 were incident fracture cases and 219 were non-cases. We censored women at the date of adjudicated incident fracture or the last follow-up date of the WHI-HT trials. The median follow-up for the current study was 6.7 years. The Research Compliance Office at Stanford University waived the IRB review because the data and specimens were collected for purposes other than the current research and researchers cannot identify study subjects.
Figure 1.

Flow chart of the case-cohort study nested within the two WHI-HT trials.
Baseline Participant Characteristics
Trained interviewers of the WHI-HT trials conducted baseline questionnaires, which gathered information of age, self-reported race/ethnicity, reproductive and medical history, lifestyle habits, and fracture-related factors (such as ever broke a bone and number of falls in past 12 months). Interviewers also examined use of bone-altering drugs (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, estrogen, glucocorticoids, and supplements of calcium and vitamin D) and lipid-lowering drugs (statins, fibric acid derivatives, and niacin) in pill bottles.(27) Certified clinic staff conducted anthropometric measures with participants lightly dressed without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2).
Measurement of Baseline Plasma 27HC
Blood samples were processed and stored at −80°C.(27) Banked EDTA plasma samples (250 μL) were shipped to UT Southwestern Department of Molecular Genetics (Dallas, TX). 27HC concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS).(21, 28) A modified Bligh-Dyer extraction was performed to isolate lipids in samples mixed with hydrolysis solution (0.5M KOH in MeOH), methanolic KOH, and deuterated standards (Avanti Polar Lipids; Alabaster, AL).(28) Aminopropyl solid-phase extraction (Biotage; Charlotte, NC) was used to purify lipids. 27HC was quantitatively analyzed using a tertiary Shimadzu LC-20XR HPLC system (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments; Columbia, MD), coupled to a Sciex API-5000 triple quadrupole MS equipped with Turbo V ESI source (Framingham, MA). 27HC was resolved with a binary solvent gradient, using a Kinetex C18 HPLC column (150×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm particle size; Phenomenex; Torrance, CA). Mobile phase A was 70% acetonitrile, mobile phase B was 1:1 (v/v) acetonitrile:isopropanol, and mobile phase C was dichloromethane. Mobile phase A and B contained 5mM ammonium acetate. The correlation of 27HC levels among 44 blind duplicates was 0.85 and the average coefficient of variation was 9.5% (max. 36.6%).
Measurement of Baseline Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD)
Pre-randomization levels of 25OHD were the sum of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels, determined by HPLC-MS following the same process of 27HC measurement at the UT Southwestern Department of Molecular Genetics (Dallas, TX).(21, 28) Among 44 blind duplicates, the correlation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 levels was 0.95 and the correlation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels was 0.98. The average coefficient of variation for 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3 levels was 14.8% (max. 26.9%) and 4.3% (max. 16.6%), respectively.
Pre-existing Baseline Blood Measurements
Pre-randomization total E2 and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were measured previously in serum at the Reproductive Endocrine Research Laboratory, University of Southern California (Los Angeles, CA).(4, 12) Total E2 concentrations were quantified using indirect radioimmunoassay with an initial column chromatographic extraction step, with a lower detection limit of 3 pg/mL (11 pmol/L), intra-assay CV of 7.9% at 34 pg/mL (124 pmol/L), and inter-assay CV of 8.0% at 16 pg/mL (58.7 pmol/L) and 12.0% at 27 pg/mL (99.1 pmol/L).(12) SHBG was measured by solid-phase two-site chemiluminescent immunoassay (Immulite Analyzer; Diagnostic Products; Los Angeles, CA) with a lower detection limit of 0.02 μg/mL (0.2 nmol/L), intra-assay CVs of 4.1% to 7.7%, and inter-assay CVs of 5.8% to 13%.(4, 12) Free E2 (non-albumin-, non-SHBG-bound E2) and bioE2 (non-SHBG-bound E2) were calculated based on the mass action equations,(29–31) using concentrations of measured total E2 and SHBG with an assumed normal albumin level. Fasting lipids were measured previously in WHI-HT.(27) LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald formula in specimens having triglycerides <400 mg/dL.(32)
Statistical Analysis
All descriptive analyses were performed separately for women in the placebo and the MHT arms. The χ2 test (categorical variables) and Kruskal-Wallis test (continuous variables) were conducted to compare baseline characteristics between incident fracture cases and non-cases. We calculated Pearson correlation coefficients (r) in non-cases to examine correlations between levels of 27HC, 27HC/bioE2, total E2, free E2, bioE2, SHBG, 25OHD, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C HDL-C, and BMI. We presented results for bioE2 since this is the bioactive form of E2 and was highly correlated with total E2 and free E2.
We performed Cox regression modeling modified for the nested case-cohort study using “unweighted” approach for pseudo-likelihood estimation.(33, 34) We constructed separate models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident fracture in relation to pre-randomization plasma levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio. 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 were each included as a continuous variable or as a categorical variable using the tertiles defined in non-cases. Cox models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, black, other), total cholesterol level, BMI, diabetes, bioE2 level, SHBG level, 25OHD level, ever use MHT, osteoporosis, history of any fracture, and falls in past 12 months. These covariates were considered to be potential confounders (BMI, diabetes, and SHBG) or fracture risk factors (ever use MHT, osteoporosis, history of any fracture, and falls history). Models included bioE2 to evaluate the 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio in relation to risk of incident fracture, while holding constant circulating bioE2 levels. Models also adjusted for 25OHD level because use of vitamin D supplements may decrease circulating 27HC levels and reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women of the WHI-HT trials.(22, 35) To maintain parsimony, the model excluded physical activity, smoking, and alcohol use since the estimates of HRs and CIs did not materially change when the model included these covariates. Baseline fracture risks differed between women of two WHI-HT trials but did not violate proportionality within each trial (Figure S1); therefore, we stratified Cox models on WHI-HT trials (E-alone or E+P trial). In sensitivity analyses, we performed analyses that included the overall study population.
To investigate whether circulating levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 modify the MHT’s effect on fracture risk, we constructed separate Cox models, which included the trial arm assignment (MHT or placebo) as a covariate and a product-term of MHT×27HC or MHT×27HC/bioE2. All statistical analyses were performed in SAS v9.4 (Cary, North Carolina).
RESULTS
The average (± standard deviation, SD) follow-up time was 6.0 (±2.8) years for 868 women of the current study population, 5.7 (±2.9) years for 485 women in the placebo arms and 6.3 (±2.8) years for 383 women in the MHT arms. Regardless of trial arms, women with incident fracture were older, were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and had a lower BMI compared with non-cases (all p-value <0.001, Table 1). In women randomized to placebo arms, history of osteoporosis and history of any fracture were more prevalent in incident fracture cases than non-cases (p<0.001). Less than 10% of our study population regularly used lipid-lowering medications or bone-altering drugs.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of postmenopausal women without incident fracture (non-cases) and those with incident fracture (cases) in the placebo (n=485) and the menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) intervention (n=383) arms of the WHI-HT trials
| Baseline (pre- randomization) Characteristics in the WHI-HT trials |
Placebo Arms | MHT Arms | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (n= 485) |
Non-cases (n=219)a |
Incident fracture cases (n=266) |
P- valueb |
Overall (n= 383) |
Non-cases (n=207)a |
Incident fracture cases (n=176) |
P- valueb |
|
| n (%) or median (interquartile range) | ||||||||
| Age (years) c | 69 (64, 73) | 67 (62, 71) | 70 (65, 74) | <.001 | 69 (62, 73) | 66 (60, 71) | 71 (65, 75) | <.001 |
| 50–64 | 132 (27) | 76 (35) | 56 (21) | <.001 | 131 (34) | 90 (43) | 41 (23) | <.001 |
| 65–69 | 130 (27) | 66 (30) | 64 (24) | 72 (19) | 45 (22) | 27 (15) | ||
| 70 and older | 223 (46) | 77 (35) | 146 (55) | 180 (47) | 72 (35) | 108 (61) | ||
| Race/ethnicity | <.001 | <.001 | ||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 416 (86) | 164 (75) | 252 (95) | 321 (84) | 160 (77) | 161 (91) | ||
| Black | 40 (8) | 34 (15) | 6 (2) | 31 (8) | 25 (12) | 6 (3) | ||
| Others | 29 (6) | 21 (10) | 8 (3) | 31 (8) | 22 (11) | 9 (5) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.2 (23.7, 31.2) | 28.6 (24.6, 32.0) | 26.2 (22.7, 30.0) | <.001 | 27.8 (24.5, 31.0) | 28.3 (24.7, 31.6) | 26.9 (24.3, 30.5) | 0.037 |
| MET-hr/wk | 5.0 (1.2, 14.2) | 5.6 (1.5, 16.0) | 5.0 (0.7, 13.5) | 0.394 | 5.0 (0.7, 13.0) | 5.0 (0.7, 12.7) | 5.0 (1.0, 14.2) | 0.697 |
| Ever use MHTd | 242 (49) | 104 (47) | 137 (51) | 0.407 | 172 (45) | 100 (49) | 72 (42) | 0.186 |
| Diabetes | 44 (9) | 24 (11) | 20 (8) | 0.190 | 29 (8) | 17 (8) | 12 (7) | 0.606 |
| CVD | 79 (16) | 36 (16) | 43 (16) | 0.867 | 66 (17) | 29 (15) | 37 (24) | 0.053 |
| Osteoporosis | 56 (12) | 14 (6) | 42 (16) | <.001 | 46 (12) | 20 (10) | 26 (15) | 0.138 |
| Any fracture | 214 (44) | 70 (32) | 144 (54) | <.001 | 165 (43) | 70 (37) | 95 (60) | <.001 |
| Self-report falls in last 12 months | 162 (33) | 62 (28) | 100 (37) | 0.150 | 118 (30) | 52 (27) | 66 (40) | 0.028 |
| Lipid-lowering druge | 44 (9) | 20 (9) | 24 (9) | 0.967 | 33 (9) | 19 (9) | 14 (8) | 0.670 |
| Statin | 40 (8) | 18 (8) | 22 (8) | 0.984 | 27 (7) | 15 (7) | 12 (7) | 0.870 |
| Bone-altering drugf | 22 (5) | 5 (2) | 17 (6) | 0.025 | 17 (4) | 10 (5) | 7 (4) | 0.685 |
| Current tobacco smoking |
42 (9) | 12 (5) | 30 (11) | 0.065 | 40 (10) | 18 (9) | 22 (13) | 0.495 |
| Alcohol use | 0.905 | 0.876 | ||||||
| Non-drinker | 53 (11) | 25 (11) | 28 (11) | 40 (10) | 22 (11) | 18 (10) | ||
| Past drinker | 115 (24) | 54 (25) | 61 (23) | 97 (25) | 51 (25) | 46 (26) | ||
| <1 drink/week | 150 (30) | 68 (31) | 82 (30) | 123 (32) | 70 (34) | 53 (30) | ||
| 1 or more drinks/week |
163 (33) | 70 (32) | 93 (34) | 119 (31) | 62 (30) | 57 (32) | ||
| Lipid Levels (mg/dL) | ||||||||
| Total cholesterol | 225 (202, 254) | 231 (206, 255) | 221 (200, 252) | 0.138 | 228 (208, 256) | 229 (210, 258) | 225 (203, 256) | 0.189 |
| LDL-C | 147 (123, 172) | 148 (127, 179) | 143 (121, 167) | 0.096 | 148 (127, 171) | 148 (127, 171) | 148 (127, 171) | 0.496 |
| HDL-C | 50 (42, 62) | 49 (43, 59) | 53 (42, 64) | 0.043 | 51 (43, 62) | 52 (42, 62) | 51 (43, 61) | 0.809 |
| Triglyceride | 116 (85, 168) | 117 (85, 167) | 116 (84, 169) | 0.734 | 119 (88, 178) | 117 (90, 181) | 120 (86, 174) | 0.673 |
WHI-HT = Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Therapy; MET = metabolic equivalent.
The non-cases excluded the 4 fracture cases who were in the random sub-cohort.
P-value for comparing fracture cases with non-cases within the placebo and the interventions arms.
P-value <0.01 for the distribution of categorical age comparing 485 women in the placebo arms with 383 women in the intervention arms; P-values were >0.1 for other variables.
Ever use MHT, excluded birth control pill use before age 50.
Lipid-lowering drugs included statins, fibric acid derivatives, and niacin.
Bone-altering drugs included bisphosphonate, calcitonin, calcium supplement, estrogen, glucocorticoids, and vitamin D supplement.
Circulating median levels of 27HC/bioE2 were higher for fracture cases than non-cases in both women in the placebo arms and the MHT arms (p<0.05; Table 2). Approximately 75% of the study population had a total E2 below 15 pg/mL. Fracture cases had a lower median total E2, free E2 and bioE2, and a higher median SHBG level when compared with non-cases (all p-value <0.05). In non-cases, 27HC levels positively correlated with levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglycerides, and 27HC/bioE2 (r ranging from 0.30 to 0.53). 27HC/bioE2 levels positively correlated with total cholesterol, HDL-C, and SHBG (r: 0.20 to 0.32) and negatively with BMI, total E2, free E2, and bioE2 (r: −0.24 to −0.40, all p-values <0.001). BioE2 levels correlated strongly with levels of total E2 and free E2 (both r > 0.98) and less so with BMI (r=0.31). 25OHD levels did not differ between fracture cases and non-cases (p-values >0.1), and 25OHD levels correlated moderately with 27HC/bioE2 ratio among women in the placebo arms (r =0.15, p <0.001). We did not observe significant correlations of 25OHD to levels of 27HC or bioE2.
Table 2.
Circulating levels of 27HC, 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio, and estradiol by incident fracture status in the placebo and the menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) intervention arms of the WHI-HT trials
| Biomarkers, median (interquartile range) |
Placebo arms (n= 485) | P- valuea |
MHT arms (n= 383) | P- valuea |
P- valueb |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-cases (n= 219) |
Fracture cases (n=266) |
Non-cases (n=207) |
Fracture cases (n=178) |
||||
| 27HC (ng/mL)c | 149 (123, 176) | 151 (124, 177) | 0.977 | 156 (129, 186) | 150 (122, 180) | 0.057 | 0.064 |
| 27HC/bioE2 (nmol/L:pmol/L)d | 13.8 (8.9, 20.3) | 17.8 (11.9, 28.4) | <.001 | 14.2 (9.5, 22.2) | 17.3 (11.4, 25.6) | 0.021 | 0.216 |
| Total E2 (pg/mL)e | 11.0 (8.2, 15.9) | 9.3 (6.3, 13.0) | <.001 | 11.1 (8.5, 15.4) | 9.4 (7.0, 13.5) | 0.003 | 0.767 |
| Free E2 (pg/mL)e | 0.29 (0.20, 0.44) | 0.22 (0.13, 0.32) | <.001 | 0.28 (0.21, 0.40) | 0.23 (0.17, 0.32) | <.001 | 0.563 |
| BioE2 (pg/mL)e | 7.3 (5.1, 11.2) | 5.6 (3.4, 8.3) | <.001 | 7.1 (5.3, 10.1) | 5.8 (4.1, 8.0) | <.001 | 0.576 |
| SHBG (nmol/L)f | 39.2 (29.1, 57.7) | 50.5 (35.3, 72.2) | <.001 | 42.2 (29.9, 58.4) | 49.7 (36.0, 62.0) | 0.002 | 0.611 |
| 25OHD (ng/mL) | 24.2 (15.3, 30.0) | 24.9 (19.1, 30.8) | 0.138 | 23.4 (16.1, 29.3) | 23.4 (17.8, 28.7) | 0.899 | 0.627 |
27HC = 27-hydroxycholesterol; BioE2 = bioavailable E2; E2 = 17β-estradiol; SHBG = sex hormone-binding globulin; 25OHD = 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
P-value for Kruskall-Wallis test comparing fracture cases with non-cases in the placebo and in the MHT arms.
P-value for Kruskall-Wallis test comparing 219 non-cases in the placebo arms with 207 non-cases in the MHT arms.
To convert 27HC in ng/mL to nmol/L, multiply by 2.48.
27HC/bioE2 molar ratio represents the moles of 27HC relative to bioE2 (or the number of 27HC molecules relative to bioE2 molecules) in a given volume of blood.
To convert pg/mL to pmol/L, multiply by 3.67. Free E2 and bioE2 were estimated from the mass action equations,(28–30) using measured concentrations of total E2 and SHBG with assumed constant for albumin.
To convert nmol/L to μg/mL, divide by 8.896.
In women assigned to the placebo arms, the risk of incident fracture increased with pre-randomization 27HC/bioE2 level (Table 3). Women who had 27HC/bioE2 in the middle (10–16 nmol/L:pmol/L) and the highest tertiles (>16 nmol/L:pmol/L) had an up to 1.9-fold (95 CI%: 1.25 to 2.99) greater risk of fracture, compared with women in the lowest tertile (<10 nmol/L:pmol/L). In women assigned to the MHT arms, pre-randomization 27HC/bioE2 in tertiles were not associated with incident fracture risk. Analyzing the overall study population, irrespective of the WHI-HT trials’ assignment, women in the highest tertile of 27HC/bioE2 had a 96% greater risk of incident fracture than those in the lowest tertile (adjusted HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.39–2.78). Circulating levels of 27HC alone did not show associations with fracture risk in women assigned to either the placebo arms or the MHT arms.
Table 3.
Hazard ratio estimates for incident fracture associated with circulating levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio in the placebo and the menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) intervention arms of the WHI-HT trials
| Placebo arms (n=485) | MHT arms (n= 383) | |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI)a | ||
| 27HC (ng/mL) | ||
| Per 1-SD (44 ng/mL) | 1.07 (0.91–1.28) | 0.99 (0.78–1.25) |
| P for interactionb | 0.983 | 0.847 |
| Tertile categoriesc | ||
| <132 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| 132–164 | 1.04 (0.74–1.46) | 0.64 (0.29–1.39) |
| >164 | 0.94 (0.63–1.40) | 0.63 (0.26–1.50) |
| P for interactionc | 0.248 | 0.377 |
| 27HC/bioE2 (nmol/L:pmol/L) | ||
| Per 1-IQR (12 nmol/L:pmol/L) | 1.09 (0.97–1.24) | 1.62 (1.16–2.25) |
| P for interactionb | 0.020 | 0.270 |
| Tertile categoriesc | ||
| <10 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| 10 – 16 | 1.93 (1.25–2.99) | 1.14 (0.40–3.26) |
| >16 | 1.61 (1.01–2.56) | 2.93 (0.92–9.33) |
| P for interaction† | <.001 | 0.425 |
27HC = 27-hydroxycholesterol; BioE2 = bioavailable E2; CI = confidence interval; IQR = interquartile range
Model stratified on WHI-HT trials (E-alone or E+P trial) and adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, total cholesterol, bioE2, SHBG, BMI, diabetes, osteoporosis, 25OHD, prior MHT use, any fracture history, and history of falls in past 12 months.
P for interaction refers to 27HC×WHI-HT trials (E+P or E-alone trial) or 27HC/bioE2×WHI-HT trials (E+P or E-alone trial) in models that did not stratify on WHI-HT trials.
Tertile category for 27HC or 27HC/bioE2 was derived from the women who did not have an incident fracture (non-cases).
In our study population, MHT reduced fracture risk in postmenopausal women by 36% (adjusted HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45–0.92, MHT arms versus placebo arms) with adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, history of any fracture, history of falls in the last 12 months, bioE2 level and 25OHD level. Circulating levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 did not modify such an association (p-values for MHT×27HC and MHT×27HC/bioE2 were >0.20, Figure 2).
Figure 2.


Hazard ratios of incident fracture comparing women assigned to the MHT arms with the placebo arms for a given level of 27HC (panel A) and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio (panel B) in product-term models that included MHT×27HC (panel A) and MHT×27HC/bioE2 (panel B). 27HC levels and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio did not modify MHT’s effect on incident fracture risk (p-value = 0.298 for MHT×27HC and 0.883 for MHT×27HC/bioE2). Hazard Ratios were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, history of any fracture, total cholesterol, 12-months history of falls, and bioE2 level. MHT = menopausal hormone therapy. Dotted lines in black = 95% Confidence Intervals. Dotted lines in blue = Null HR.
DISCUSSION
The current prospective study, the first in humans to our knowledge, showed that postmenopausal women with higher levels of 27HC, relative to estradiol, had an increased risk of incident fracture. During a mean follow-up of 6.0 years, postmenopausal women in the placebo arms who had 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio in the middle or the highest tertile had an adjusted 61% to 93% greater risk of incident fracture than those in the lowest tertile. Circulating levels of 27HC and 27HC/bioE2 molar ratio did not appear to alter the fracture risk reduction from MHT. Depending on bioE2 level, 27HC may be detrimental to bone in postmenopausal women, resulting in an increased fracture risk.
In mice and in vitro studies, 27HC competes with E2 for binding to the ER and negatively regulates bone, as well as ER-positive breast tumors and the cardiovascular system.(15–19) In wild-type mice, 27HC reduced BMD at the spine and femur, modified trabecular architecture, decreased trabecular bone volume, reduced osteocalcin level, and increased expression of OPG and RANKL.(15, 16) Ovariectomized Cyp7b1−/− mice, which had higher amounts of 27HC than wild-type, had a significantly lower cortical BMD than ovariectomized wild-type mice, while supplementation with E2 reversed this effect on bone.(15) 27HC appears to bind preferentially to ERβ over ERα, and 27HC may not able to fully compete with E2 binding, suggesting the two may bind at different sites.(36) The current study results do not appear to contradict these observations at the receptor level and in the animal models. However, this study cannot comment on how 27HC may bind to ERβ in an environment of different circulating bioE2 levels.
The current study is the first to report the relationship of circulating 27HC levels to incident fracture risk, accounting for bioE2 level. A handful of studies have focused on cardiovascular disease and breast cancer in humans.(18, 22, 37) In the WHI-HT trials, circulating levels of 27HC were not associated with incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and did not modify the effect of MHT on CHD risk among 350 CHD cases and 813 matched controls.(37) However, 27HC levels were measured by a method different from that in the current study, and E2 levels were not available. Using the same measurement method as the current study, serum 27HC levels in 3230 participants (56% female) from the Dallas Heart Study were positively correlated with fasting levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-C (r: 0.30 to 0.50), and negatively with BMI (r: −0.10),(21) which were similar to findings in the current study. In women with ER-positive breast cancer who received high dose vitamin D supplements, change in circulating 27HC levels has an inverse relationship with change in 25OHD levels.(22) We did not observe correlations between levels of 27HC and 25OHD in postmenopausal women.
The current study had limitations. Firstly, unlike hip fractures, vertebral fractures are often asymptomatic, and our sub-cohort and hip fracture cases may have unknowingly included women with such vertebral fractures. However, we would expect that this potential misclassification, if present, would be non-differential between exposure groups and bias risk estimates conservatively toward the null. Secondly, BMD was unavailable in this study. Thirdly, we cannot rule out residual confounding although the multivariable models adjusted for many potential confounders and putative fracture risk factors. Fourthly, the CEE contains mostly estrone and we did not measure estrone levels. We cannot know how the interaction of estrone, E2 and 27HC may influence the risk of fracture. Lastly, the current study had limited power to detect associations within each of the trial arms.
This study has several strengths. All incident fractures were adjudicated, and the participant population was characterized in detail. Endogenous circulating levels of 27HC and E2 were obtained in blood drawn prior to WHI-HT randomization, ensuring that measured levels of 27HC and E2 in the current study were not affected by the MHT intervention. The relatively large sample size gave the study 80% power to detect a minimum HR between 1.20 and 1.25. We were able to adjust for multiple fracture risk factors and confounding factors, including 25OHD levels. Levels of 27HC and 25OHD were quantitatively measured by mass spectrometry.
CONCLUSION
Circulating 27HC in relation to the risk of incident fracture depends on the relative amount of circulating endogenous E2 in postmenopausal women. Specifically, the risk of incident fracture increased with circulating levels of 27HC to bioE2 (molar ratio) among postmenopausal women. On the other hand, 27HC levels and 27HC/bioE2 levels do not modify the fracture risk reduction from MHT. If findings are confirmed, circulating levels of 27HC relative to bioE2 may identify a subgroup of postmenopausal women who are at particularly high risk of fracture. This study supports the possibility that interventions that reduce the production of 27HC in cholesterol metabolism may benefit bone health in postmenopausal women.(16) The effects of 27HC on bone and on other estrogen-influenced tissue sites warrant further study in the context of circulating bioE2 level, to weigh the potential risks and benefits of this newly purported endogenous SERM.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Funding/Support:
The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services through contracts, HHSN268201600018C, HHSN268201600001C, HHSN268201600002C, HHSN268201600003C, and HHSN268201600004C.
Grant supporters: PYC was supported by NIDDK grant T32 DK007217. DPM received federal funding from the National Institutes of Health (DK48807). BMT and JGM were supported by Center for Human Nutrition. JGM was supported by a Program Project Grant to Molecular Genetics (HL20948).
This study received pilot feasibility contract funding from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH/NHLBI Subcontract HHSN268201100046C; PI: Lee, JS).
Footnotes
Disclosure: All authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, et al. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Albright F, Smith PH, Richardson AM. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: its clinical features. JAMA. 1941;116(22):2465–74. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cummings SR, Browner WS, Bauer D, Stone K, Ensrud K, Jamal S, et al. Endogenous hormones and the risk of hip and vertebral fractures among older women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(11):733–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee JS, LaCroix AZ, Wu L, Cauley JA, Jackson RD, Kooperberg C, et al. Associations of serum sex hormone-binding globulin and sex hormone concentrations with hip fracture risk in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1796–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chapurlat RD, Garnero P, Bréart G, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Serum Estradiol and Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly Women: The EPIDOS Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(9):1835–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lim VW, Li J, Gong Y, Yuan JM, Wu TS, Hammond GL, et al. Serum free estradiol and estrogen receptor-alpha mediated activity are related to decreased incident hip fractures in older women. Bone. 2012;50(6):1311–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Effects of hormone therapy on bone mineral density: results from the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial. The Writing Group for the PEPI. JAMA. 1996;276(17):1389–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stefanick ML. Estrogens and progestins: background and history, trends in use, and guidelines and regimens approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Am J Med. 2005;118(12):64–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black H, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1701–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, Aragaki AK, Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310(13):1353–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cauley JA, LaCroix AZ, Robbins JA, Larson J, Wallace R, Wactawski-Wende J, et al. Baseline serum estradiol and fracture reduction during treatment with hormone therapy: The Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial. Osteopor Int. 2010;21(1):167–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McDonnell DP. The Molecular Pharmacology of SERMs. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1999;10(8):301–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Umetani M, Shaul PW. 27-Hydroxycholesterol: the first identified endogenous SERM. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011;22(4):130–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.DuSell CD, Nelson ER, Wang X, Abdo J, Modder UI, Umetani M, et al. The endogenous selective estrogen receptor modulator 27-hydroxycholesterol is a negative regulator of bone homeostasis. Endocrinology. 2010;151(8):3675–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nelson ER, DuSell CD, Wang X, Howe MK, Evans G, Michalek RD, et al. The oxysterol, 27-hydroxycholesterol, links cholesterol metabolism to bone homeostasis through its actions on the estrogen and liver X receptors. Endocrinology. 2011;152(12):4691–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Umetani M, Domoto H, Gormley AK, Yuhanna IS, Cummins CL, Javitt NB, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol is an endogenous SERM that inhibits the cardiovascular effects of estrogen. Nat Med. 2007;13(10):1185–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu Q, Ishikawa T, Sirianni R, Tang H, McDonald JG, Yuhanna IS, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol promotes cell-autonomous, ER-positive breast cancer growth. Cell Rep. 2013;5(3):637–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nelson ER, Wardell SE, Jasper JS, Park S, Suchindran S, Howe MK, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol links hypercholesterolemia and breast cancer pathophysiology. Science. 2013;342(6162):1094–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Raza S, Meyer M, Goodyear C, Hammer KDP, Guo B, Ghribi O. The cholesterol metabolite 27-hydroxycholesterol stimulates cell proliferation via ERbeta in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stiles AR, Kozlitina J, Thompson BM, McDonald JG, King KS, Russell DW. Genetic, anatomic, and clinical determinants of human serum sterol and vitamin D levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(38):E4006–E14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Going CC, Alexandrova L, Lau K, Yeh CY, Feldman D, Pitteri SJ. Vitamin D supplementation decreases serum 27-hydroxycholesterol in a pilot breast cancer trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(3):797–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stefanick ML, Cochrane BB, Hsia J, Barad DH, Liu JH, Johnson SR. The Women’s Health Initiative postmenopausal hormone trials: overview and baseline characteristics of participants. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9 Suppl):S78–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Curb JD, McTiernan A, Heckbert SR, Kooperberg C, Stanford J, Nevitt M, et al. Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the women’s health initiative. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9):S122–S8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, Cummings SR, Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, et al. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;290(13):1729–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jackson RD, Wactawski-Wende J, LaCroix AZ, Pettinger M, Yood RA, Watts NB, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen on risk of fractures and BMD in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: results from the women’s health initiative randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(6):817–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R, Lund B, Hall D, Davis S, et al. Implementation of the women’s health initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9):S5–S17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McDonald JG, Smith DD, Stiles AR, Russell DW. A comprehensive method for extraction and quantitative analysis of sterols and secosteroids from human plasma. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(7):1399–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rinaldi S, Geay A, Dechaud H, Biessy C, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Akhmedkhanov A, et al. Validity of free testosterone and free estradiol determinations in serum samples from postmenopausal women by theoretical calculations. Cancer Eidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(10 Pt 1):1065–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Södergard R, Bäckström T, Shanbhag V, Carstensen H. Calculation of free and bound fractions of testosterone and estradiol-17β to human plasma proteins at body temperature. J Steroid Biochem. 1982;16(6):801–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM. A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(10):3666–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Farhat GN, Cummings SR, Chlebowski RT, Parimi N, Cauley JA, Rohan TE, et al. Sex Hormone Levels and Risks of Estrogen Receptor–Negative and Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(7):562–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, Wallace RB, Robbins J, Lewis CE, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(7):669–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Starkey NJE, Li Y, Drenkhahn-Weinaug SK, Liu J, Lubahn DB. 27-Hydroxycholesterol Is an Estrogen Receptor β–Selective Negative Allosteric Modifier of 17β-Estradiol Binding. Endocrinology. 2018;159(5):1972–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Hsia J, Martin LW, et al. Relationships of coronary heart disease with 27-hydroxycholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and menopausal hormone therapy. Circulation. 2012;126(13):1577–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
