Abstract
Paediatric skull lesions are commonly identified on imaging. They can be challenging to image, given their location and size, and often require several imaging modalities to narrow down the differential diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is paramount because the clinical therapy can vary tremendously. In this review, we provide a simple and systematic approach to clinical-radiological features of primary skull lesions. We highlight the imaging characteristics and differentiate pathologies based on imaging appearances. We also accentuate the role of cross-sectional imaging in lesion identification and management implications.
Keywords: skull lesions, paediatric skull, cross-sectional, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
Introduction
Skull lesions in the paediatric population are common entities and often constitute a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists. A wide spectrum of lesions exists, which includes congenital, traumatic, infectious, neoplastic, vascular, and post-surgical abnormalities during imaging pathways. The wide array of differential diagnoses challenges the radiologists to identify the lesion as either benign or malignant in nature. Providing a systematic pathway to diagnosis increases the reader’s confidence in accurately diagnosing these lesions, whether it is an incidental or palpable abnormality (Figure 1). Depending on the age of the patient, certain pathologies predominate; in neonates and infants, congenital and benign lesions are more prevalent, whereas in older children, neoplastic and inflammatory origins are to be considered (whether symptomatic or asymptomatic). Imaging modalities such as thin-section computed tomography (CT), multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and sonography (US) are essential to define the origin, nature, and extent of these lesions. The aim of this review is to provide radiologists with a simple and systematic approach to the characterisation, detection, and differential diagnosis of paediatric skull lesions.
Figure 1.
Imaging pathways of skull lesions in the paediatric population
Congenital
Congenital depression of the skull
Congenital depression of the skull is rare, with an estimated incidence of < 0.0001% [1]. Most of these cases are probably related to trauma during difficult labour, by obstetric manoeuvres or pressure from forceps. In the absence of trauma or risk factors, reports of depressed skull fractures are rare [1-7]. In a small number of reported cases, intrauterine events have been thought to be the cause. Other postulated risk factors include pressure on the soft foetal skull from maternal structures such as ischial spines, fifth lumbar vertebrae, pubic symphysis, asymmetric or contracted pelvis, and uterine myomas [8-10]. Skull depressions may occur with or without fractures and can be classified as linear, depressed, or ‘ping-pong’ fractures and occipital osteodiastasis [11]. They most frequently occur in the temporal and parietal bones [12]. In the majority of cases, neonates are neurologically intact; deficits are a rare association, often secondary to intra- or extra-axial haematomas.
Computed tomography of the head is usually the modality of choice. It reveals fractures, secondary haematomas, and brain compression, all of which would require aggressive treatment [10] (Figure 2). Magnetic resonance imaging is indicated if there is suspicion of structural brain anomalies. The majority of skull depressions resolve spontaneously within 4-6 months, and in the absence of neurological symptoms, a conservative approach with a six-month observation period is advised [13,14].
Figure 2.
A) Skull film shows focal depression of right anterior parietal skull (arrow). B, C) Axial head computed tomography with soft tissue and bone windows show abnormal contour and depression of the right calvarium. No acute fractures were identified
Frontonasal dysplasia
Frontonasal dysplasia (FND), also known as Tessier cleft, median cleft face syndrome, frontonasal dysostosis, or frontonasal malformation, is a congenital malformation of the midface [15]. While its cause is still unknown, environmental and genetic factors may play a role [16,17].
Diagnostic criteria for FND are a wide nasal root, hypertelorism, vertical midline cleft of the nose and/or upper lip, cleft of the wings of the nose, malformed nasal tip, or V-shaped hair pattern on the forehead [15]. Patients can present with at least two of the above-mentioned signs to be labelled with FND. There are two different categories of mid-facial malformations. The first is with hypertelorism, which includes FND. The second is with hypotelorism and includes holoprosencephaly [18,19]. Plain films and computed tomography of the skull are crucial for planning surgery (Figure 3) [20]. Prenatal ultrasound can depict various features of FND [21,22]. The first goal of postnatal treatment is to establish a proper airway because newborns can only breath through the nose [23].
Figure 3.
Four-month-old girl with frontonasal dysplasia. A, B) Axial head computed tomography images in brain and bone windows show midline nasal and frontal calvarial defects with associated telecanthus. C) 3D reformat and (D) sagittal T1-W images show a large defect in the frontal calvarium
Aplasia cutis congenita
Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) can be clinically diagnosed; defined as the congenital absence of the skin, it presents with a focal ulcer over the vertex of the skull [24,25]. The cause of ACC remains obscure, with various aetiologies suggested [26,27]. The defect involves the calvaria and the dura mater, with 20-30% of cases presenting with associated anomalies [25,28-31]. While the majority of children have a single defect, it is doubled in 20% and may involve the trunk or limbs [32-38]. Larger defects revealing the dura and sagittal sinus require treatment at birth to avoid complications such as meningeal infection and haemorrhage. If ACC occurs as a small focal ulcer, it heals spontaneously [34,37]. However, when the defect is large, surgery is performed to prevent complications [31].
Conventional radiographs of the skull demonstrate bony defects at the level of the absent skin. MRI or CT clearly delineates intracranial malformations and demonstrates the proximity of the scalp/skull defects and underlying sagittal sinus (Figure 4A-C). Ultrasound is recommended to look for associated visceral malformations [39-42]. The larger defects are invariably associated with a skull defect, with the dura and brain covered only by an ulcer or a thin membrane (Figure 4D) [29,31,32,37].
Figure 4.
A) Coronal, B) axial head computed tomography angiography show a large left paramidline skull defect (white arrow) and an associated scalp defect, where the superior sagittal sinus abuts and extends to the cutaneous surface (black arrow). C) 3D reformat shows the skull defect and scattered small parietal foramina. D) Clinical image of scalp ulcer/wound
Arachnoid granulations
Arachnoid granulations, also known as Pacchionian granulations, are focal invaginations of the leptomeninges into the venous sinuses [43,44]. Their most common location is within the superior sagittal sinus, followed in decreasing frequency by the transverse and cavernous sinus [43-45]. Arachnoid granulations increase in number and size with age and are frequently found at venous entry sites into the sinus [44-48].
CT demonstrates granulations as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) density invaginating into the calvarium or a dural venous sinus resulting in a filling defect (Figure 5). They may be confused with venous sinus thrombosis but are usually differentiated by their classic location and round, well-defined shape. Similarly, on MRI, signal characteristics are those of CSF (low T1, high T2, and suppressed on FLAIR).
Figure 5.
A, B) Sagittal and (C, D) axial head computed tomography images on brain and bone window show a prominent arachnoid granulation with scalloping of the calvarial inner table
Arachnoid cysts
Arachnoid cysts are congenital intra-arachnoidal lesions filled with CSF, which do not communicate with the ventricles. They are most frequently unilocular, well-marginated lesions moulded by nearby structures. Arachnoid cysts are common, representing 1% of all intracranial masses [49]. Most cysts are supratentorial in location, with 50-60% in the middle cranial fossa, anterior to the temporal lobes. Other common locations include the suprasellar cistern and posterior fossa (10%), particularly in the cerebellopontine angle cistern. Arachnoid cysts are usually stable in size, however cases of enlargement as well as resolution, have been published [50-54]. They can present from small and incidental to very large with mass-effect on the underlying brain [49,51,52].
Imaging demonstrates a well-delineated extra-axial cyst with CSF density/signal that can result in a mass effect on the adjacent brain, with scalloping of the inner table (Figure 6). Classically, no identifiable internal architecture or enhancement is seen. Rarely, high-protein content or haemorrhage within the cyst may render diagnosis rather difficult [49,51,52].
Figure 6.
Five-year-old girl with multiple arachnoid cysts and clinically visible swelling. A, B) Axial head computed tomography images show extra-axial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) signal lesion in the left temporal region with scalloping of the inner table of the skull and bulging overlying skull. C, D) Axial T2-W images show extra-axial CSF signal cystic lesions exerting mild mass effect on the adjacent brain parenchyma and skull
Dermoid/epidermoid cyst
Dermoid and epidermoid cysts result from persistent ectodermal elements at sites of suture or neural tube closure, as well as diverticulation of the cerebral hemispheres [55,56]. Dermoids are composed of ectoderm and skin elements, whereas epidermoids contain exclusively ectodermal elements. Both are most commonly seen in the midline, frontal, and temporal regions.
CT appearances change depending on constitution, with fatty density with dermoids and fluid density with epidermoid cysts. Similarly, MRI signal (Figures 7 and 8) depends on the content, ranging from a fluid signal in an epidermoid cyst to a fat-containing signal in a dermoid. Epidermoid cysts characteristically have high signal on the diffusion-weighted sequence [57,58]. On ultrasound, dermoid cysts demonstrate hypoechogenic internal structure and hyperechogenic surrounding wall with no active blood flow.
Figure 7.
One-year-old male patient with epidermoid cyst. A) Frontal X-ray of the skull shows a well-demarcated lytic lesion with sclerotic borders involving the frontal bone at the midline. B-D) Axial T2, axial T1 post contrast, and sagittal T1 images show an oval shaped non-enhancing cystic lesion involving the frontal bone with expansion of the diploic space. E) Ultrasonography shows an oval shaped homogeneous lesion with hypoechogenic internal structure, hyperechogenic surrounding wall, and no obvious flow on colour Doppler
Figure 8.
Right periorbital dermoid cyst. A) Frontal X-ray of the skull shows an ill-defined lytic lesion involving the right temporal bone. B-E) Axial T1, T1 post contrast, T2 and T1 fat-sat post-contrast images, respectively, shows a fat-containing lesion expanding the right temporal bone with thin peripheral enhancement
Parietal/bi-parietal foramen
Parietal foramina represent a disorder of calvarial ossification. At birth, either a large single midline or bilateral calvarial defects are present, with the brain covered by a dura, pericranium, and overlying scalp. Defects usually close in mid-childhood, leaving symmetrical foramina [59]. A familial incidence with autosomal dominant inheritance has been identified with specific gene mutations discovered [60-62].
The pathology is believed to be benign; however, cross-sectional imaging with CT and MRI has uncovered associated intracranial anomalies, particularly abnormal venous development. CT images demonstrate either a single or paired rounded defect(s) at the level of the parietal bone adjacent to the intersection of the sagittal and lambdoid sutures (Figure 9). Defects may be large and unified across the midline. MRI is the modality of choice for detecting associated venous, cortical, or meningeal abnormalities.
Figure 9.
Ten-year-old boy with right parietal foramen. A) Axial computed tomography, B) T2-W, and (C) coronal Gd-enhanced T1-W show a prominent right parietal foramen (arrows)
Encephalocele
Encephalocele is the herniation of intracranial tissue through a defect in the skull [63-65]. When they contain only meninges, they are called meningoceles, or meningoencephaloceles if brain tissue is also included. They are most commonly occipital in location (75%); 15% are frontoethmoidal and the remaining cases are basal [64]. Occipital encephaloceles may be seen with Chiari or Dandy-Walker malformations as well as callosal or migrational anomalies [66-68]. Frontoethmoidal encephaloceles known as sincipital encephaloceles are divided into nasofrontal, nasoethmoidal, and naso-orbital types [69-71]. The intracranial extent of the majority of frontoethmoidal encephaloceles lies at the foramen caecum [64,65]. Basal encephaloceles are not generally visible externally, although they may manifest as a mass in the oropharynx or nasopharynx.
Atretic encephaloceles are also included in the differential of skin-covered midline scalp masses. The most common location is parietal, and they usually contain meninges and neural rests [72]. A vertically positioned straight sinus is commonly associated with this entity [72,73]. Atretic encephaloceles contain a fibrous stalk at their base that connects to the dura mater.
MRI is the modality of choice for determining the contents of an encephalocele preoperatively. CT is helpful to define the bone anatomy; however, the intracranial extent is best seen with MR (Figures 10, 11). Occipital encephaloceles commonly involve the cerebellar or cerebral hemispheres and may involve the dural venous sinuses.
Figure 10.
Occipital encephalocele. A) Sagittal T1-W and (B) axial T2-W images show a small midline defect with a herniated sac containing cerebrospinal fluid and a small portion of the cerebellar parenchyma (arrow). Naso-ethmoidal encephalocele. C) Axial non-enhanced computed tomography and (D) sagittal T1-W images show midline brain tissue mass protruding through a defect in the cribriform plate as well as agenesis of the corpus callosum
Figure 11.
Atretic parietal encephalocele. A-C) Sagittal T1-W, post Gd T1W, T2W, and (D) axial T2W images demonstrate a slightly off-midline hyperintense T2 herniation sac through a parietal defect (arrows) and a persistent embryonic falcine sinus (arrow head) directed at the atretic cephalocele. Also note the absence of a straight sinus. E, F) Colour Doppler US images demonstrate the herniated sac containing fibro-fatty tissue
Craniosynostosis: Crouzon syndrome
Craniosynostosis was first described by Virchow in 1851 [74,75] and is defined as a premature fusion of the cranial sutures that leads to characteristic abnormal morphologies of the cranium. Although craniosynostosis is seen in different syndromes, single sutural synostosis is most commonly an isolated finding [76,77].
Crouzon syndrome (CS) is an autosomal dominant condition, resulting from mutations in the FGFR-2 gene on chromosome 10q25-q26 [78,79]. It is characterised by the presence of craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia with “beaked” nasal tip, midface retrusion, mandibular prognathism, and disproportionately striking exorbitism. Most commonly, patients with CS show bicoronal synostosis. The key finding in patients with CS is the notable absence of hand anomalies that affect other groups of patients with similar skull deformities. CT demonstrates diffuse morphological abnormality of the inner table of the skull, with areas of discontinuation in the calvarium, while 3D CT image reformations provide superior evaluation of sutures and preoperative planning (Figure 12).
Figure 12.
Five-month-old boy with Crouzon’s syndrome and skull abnormality. A, B) Axial head computed tomography images on bone window show diffuse morphological abnormality of the inner table of the skull with areas of discontinuation in the calvarium. C) 3D reformat shows the gross bony abnormality and foramina. VP shunt in place for hydrocephalus decompression
Sphenoid wing dysplasia
Sphenoid dysplasia is a major but not pathognomonic feature of neurofibromatosis type 1 [80]. Imaging findings include middle cranial fossa enlargement, anterior displacement of the greater sphenoid wing (often in association with a temporal arachnoid cyst), widening of the superior orbital fissure, and elevation of the lesser sphenoid wing. There is also secondary ipsilateral orbital enlargement (Figure 13) [81].
Figure 13.
Twelve-year-old girl with neurofibromatosis type I and sphenoid wing dysplasia. A) Axial T2-W and (B) T1-W images show absence of the right sphenoid wing, expanded middle cranial fossa, and displaced contents with resultant right proptosis. C) Sagittal T1-WI shows absence of sella and sphenoid wing
Traumatic
Cephalohematoma
Cephalohematoma is defined as a subperiosteal haemorrhage confined by cranial sutures, whereas caput succedaneum crosses sutures and is mostly located at the vertex. A subgaleal haematoma is below the aponeurosis covering the scalp and is not confined by suture lines (Figure 14). Cephalohematomas occur in 1-2% of vaginal deliveries and 3-4% of assisted deliveries (vacuum or forceps) [82]. Chronic cephalohematomas calcify and have a typical clinical and radiologic appearance (Figure 15) [83]. They are usually of no clinical significance and do not require treatment, with resolution occurring by weeks to four months of age. They may present a challenge for clinicians because they can become infected, requiring drainage and antibiotic therapy [83,84].
Figure 14.
Newborn with both cephalohematoma and subgaleal fluid collection. A, B) Coronal T1- and flair-weighted images shows the presence of a cephalohematoma and subgaleal fluid collection respectively (arrows)
Figure 15.
Five-month-old boy with enlarging right skull “mass”. A, B) Axial head computed tomography in soft tissue and bone windows, respectively, shows a peripherally ossified subperiosteal haematoma. C) 3D surface rendered image demonstrates a large ossified lump in the area of concern
On cross-sectional imaging, acute cephalohematomas are crescent-shaped collections adjacent to the outer table of the skull. Chronic cephalohematomas may calcify and appear hyperdense on CT [82,83]. Evolutionary changes of cephalohematoma may demonstrate erosive changes and periosteal reaction that can be worrisome in the absence of a clinical history. MRI signal intensity follows that of subacute haemorrhage but may change with the stage of haemorrhage.
Infection
Osteomyelitis
Skull osteomyelitis in the paediatric population is most commonly a complication of a skull wound following either surgery or trauma. It may also occur secondary to sinus or ear infection, at the level of the frontal and parietotemporal bones, respectively. In addition, it may result from a complication of an infected scalp wound from the use of forceps or be secondary to intrauterine monitoring (Figure 16A).
Figure 16.
A) Two-month-old baby boy with MRSA osteomyelitis of skull and scalp abscess. Left: Axial head computed tomography shows a mixed hyperdense lesion overlying and expanding the right lambdoid suture. Right: Post Gd T1-W image shows enhancing soft tissue with intracranial extension and dural thickening/enhancement (black arrow). B) 16-year-old male with acute sinusitis and Pott’s puffy tumour. Left: axial T2-W and right: Gd-enhanced T1-W images demonstrate peripherally enhancing subgaleal abscess collections with soft tissue swelling and rim-enhancing bifrontal epidural abscesses (white arrow) with associated dural thickening and enhancement
Subperiosteal abscess
Pott puffy tumour represents a subperiosteal abscess of the frontal bone with frontal osteomyelitis. The infection can spread directly through the thin bone wall of the sinus or through the network of small veins that drain its mucosa (Figure 16B) [85]. Frontal sinusitis and trauma are the most common causes of this condition. The most common causal organisms are streptococci, staphylococci, and anaerobic bacteria [85,86].
Contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging is needed to evaluate for possible intracranial complications such as epidural/subdural empyema, meningitis, intraparenchymal abscess, and dural venous sinus thrombosis. Subtle intracranial involvement is more easily seen in MR imaging. In the scalp, rim enhancement may be noted when an organised fluid collection is present. Surgical drainage remains the mainstay of therapy.
Benign neoplasia
Osteoma
Osteomas are uncommon in children, but the most common benign bony tumour in adults [87]. Skull lesions often present as a painless lump, while paranasal sinus lesions present with sinusitis or exophthalmos. Conventional radiographs demonstrate a well-circumscribed hyperostotic lesion (Figure 17A), which can be further characterised by CT (Figure 17B-D). Multiple lesions are seen in Gardner’s syndrome or hereditary polyposis syndrome. Prognosis is excellent with local resection. The differential diagnosis includes fibrous dysplasia and sessile osteochondroma.
Figure 17.
Thirteen-year-old male patient with osteoma of the right occipital bone. A) Lateral projection X-ray of the skull shows a well-defined focal bulging mass at the level of the occipital bone (white arrow) seen as an ovoid dense sclerotic lesion related to the outer table of the right occipital bone on the axial head computed tomography images (B-D)
Lipoma
Lipomas are benign tumours consisting of mature fat cells. They are well-demarcated masses of fat density (CT) and signal (MRI), with drop of signal on fat-saturated sequences (Figure 18). The presence of soft tissue enhancement should raise concern for liposarcoma. The differential diagnosis of fat-containing lesions of the skull includes primarily dermoid and teratoma.
Figure 18.
A, B) Axial non-contrast computed tomography of the head in the soft tissue and bone window shows the presence of a small homogenous lesion of fat density overlying the left occipital bone
Myofibroma
Infantile myofibromatosis is a rare mesenchymal disorder of childhood, defined by the presence of tumours in the muscle, skin, bone, viscera, and subcutaneous tissue [88-90]. It represents the most common fibrous tumour of infancy [91]. The disease is divided into two groups: solitary, which is the most common, and multicentric.
On imaging, bone lesions are round, 1-3 cm in size, well-defined lytic areas with or without a sclerotic rim [91-94], and they most commonly involve the temporal and parietal bones [95,96]. On CT, the lesions appear hypodense or isodense to the brain, and enhancement may be marked and homogeneous or heterogeneous [95]. On MRI, they are hypointense/isointense on T1-, and hyperintense or isointense on T2-weighted images, with marked enhancement after contrast administration (Figure 19). The differential diagnosis of a similar-looking calvarial lesion includes Langerhans cell histiocytosis, osteomyelitis, metastasis, osteoblastoma, epidermoid cyst, haemangioma, fibrous dysplasia, fibrosarcoma, and intraosseous meningioma [92,96-100].
Figure 19.
A) Axial T2-W, B) Post-Gd T1-W, and (C) sagittal fat-suppressed T2 images show a right occipital subgaleal mass (arrows) with isointense T2 signal and no contrast enhancement. Pathological proven scalp myofibroma
Intraosseous haemangioma
Intraosseous haemangiomas constitute 1-5% of calvarial neoplasms in the paediatric population [101,102]. Two forms exist: an uncommon globular form occurring at the skull base, and a more frequent sessile form, within the calvarium [103]. The globular subset more often have intracranial extension, which may result in neurological symptoms.
Computed tomography and conventional radiographic imaging typically demonstrate a well-defined osteolytic lesion involving the diploic space expanding the outer table with a sunburst or honeycomb trabecular pattern. Periosteal reaction is rare [104]. MRI can depict the vascular channels and can clearly define the extent of the lesion and its relationship to adjacent neurovascular structures (Figure 20) [105]. After contrast administration, haemangiomas show diffuse and heterogeneous enhancement [106]. Occasionally, a haemangioma may become aggressive, with an intra- or extracranial soft-tissue component that may simulate a malignant neoplasm [106,107].
Figure 20.
Eighteen-year-old male patient with intraosseous haemangioma. A) Axial head computed tomography shows a well-defined osteolytic lesion with a characteristic sunburst pattern at the vertex. B-D) Axial T2 and axial and sagittal T1 gadolinium enhanced images shows predominantly high T2 signal intensity lesion showing diffuse homogenous enhancement at the level of the left parietal bone
Infantile haemangioma
Infantile haemangioma is the commonest vascular neoplasm of infancy, with a prevalence of about 2-3% and a female predominance [108-111]. They are most commonly located in the face and neck (60% of cases), followed by the trunk (25%) and extremities (15%) [108,110,112]. They are usually not visible at birth but show rapid growth during the first few weeks, becoming evident by three months of age. No treatment is required because of spontaneous involution; however, treatment may be needed if the haemangioma is symptomatic or occurs in regions where there is secondary loss of function or aesthetic impairment.
The diagnosis is made clinically; however, imaging, specifically MRI, may be required in deep haemangiomas with normal overlying skin, when evaluation of extension is necessary for therapeutic planning.
MR imaging features change with the different evolutionary stages. During the proliferative phase, they are well-delineated lesions with high signal on T2- and isointense signal on T1-weighted images, with early avid enhancement and presence of flow-voids (Figure 21) [108]. Perilesional oedema should not be seen [113]. The feature distinguishing an infantile haemangioma from an AVM is the absence of arteriovenous shunting [114]. During the involuting phase, increasing amounts of fat replace the tumour, seen as foci of increased signal intensity on T1-weighted images with a decrease in the degree of enhancement [108]. If perilesional oedema is present, other tumoural lesions (sarcoma, neuroblastoma, haemangiopericytoma, fibrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma) must be ruled out [113].
Figure 21.
Eleven-month-old boy with infantile haemangioma. A) Sagittal T1-W, B) axial T2-W, post-Gd (C) axial, and (D) coronal T1-W images show a T2 hyperintense and avidly enhancing lesion arising from the frontal calvarium with central flow voids
Malignant neoplasia
Langerhans cell histiocytosis
Histiocytosis is characterised by the proliferation of Langerhans cells, a type of histiocyte from the monocyte-macrophage cell line [115]. Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is subdivided into three types based on the organs involved, patient’s age at onset, and clinical course: localised, chronic disseminated, and fulminant-disseminated. Localised LCH is the mildest and most common form and involves either bone or lung, with a peak prevalence between one and four years of age and a slight male predilection [116]. Localised lesions in this age present as painful lumps and are usually clinically misdiagnosed as trauma or infection [117]. Head and neck manifestations of LCH occur in the majority of children, with the skull and skin frequently involved [117-120]. The calvaria is the most common location of osseous LCH [121]. Other commonly involved sites include the orbit, maxilla, mandible, and temporal bone [122].
At radiography, bone lesions appear lytic, with either a well- or poorly-defined border without reactive sclerosis or periosteal reaction, and they are described as “punched-out” lesions [123]. Skull lesions typically have a bevelled-edge appearance due to asymmetric destruction of the inner and outer tables. On CT, they present as an enhancing soft-tissue mass with bone erosion. On MRI, they have low to isointense signal intensity on T1- and hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images with diffuse enhancement post contrast administration (Figure 22)[122]. Both CT and MRI are often required for follow-up of repair of bone-destructive lesions and resolution of soft-tissue masses. Intracranial involvement is best seen with MR imaging.
Figure 22.
Seven-year-old boy with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. A) Lateral skull plain radiograph shows a single sharply marginated (bevelled edges) lytic calvarial lesion. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging. B, C) Pre- and post-Gd T1-WIs show a heterogeneously enhancing intradiploic calvarial mass extending across the inner and outer tables
Osteosarcoma
Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant tumour of bone, but it rarely occurs in the skull [124]. The mandible is the most common craniofacial bone affected. It may result from malignant degeneration of fibrous dysplasia. The tumours increase in size rapidly and commonly present with pain and swelling. Gross total excision is thought to be the best treatment.
MRI and CT show bone growth with lytic areas and periosteal remodelling (Figure 23). No radiographic finding is pathognomonic. Biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis.
Figure 23.
Eighteen-year-old male with right parietal osteosarcoma. A) Contrast-enhanced head computed tomography shows a right parietal enhancing mass. B) Axial T1-W and (C, D) post-Gd T1-W images show an intensely enhancing extra-axial mass with extracranial (white arrows) and intracranial, extra-axial components. Central non-enhancing area is consistent with necrosis
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma is the commonest soft tissue sarcoma in children [125]. The head and neck are the most common locations, particularly the anterior skull base (40%) and the orbit (25%) [125]. Symptomatology depends on tumour size and location. Imaging findings are non-specific and may be confused with other tumours. MRI is the technique of choice due to excellent soft tissue contrast and is primarily used to assess disease extension and aid in staging. It usually demonstrates heterogeneously enhancing soft tissue mass with bone destruction and bone remodelling (Figure 24).
Figure 24.
Three-month-old girl with right sinonasal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. A-C) Coronal and axial T1 fat-sat post-contrast and axial T2 fat sat images of the face, respectively, shows a heterogeneously enhancing mass centred at the level of the right maxillary sinus extending to the nasal cavity and masticator space with bone destruction as demonstrated on axial computed tomography post-contrast image of the face (D)
Metastatic neuroblastoma
Neuroblastoma is the third most common malignancy in children, preceded by leukaemia and primary brain tumours. They arise most commonly in the adrenal gland or less often along the sympathetic chain in the abdomen. Neuroblastomas are metastatic in up to 70% of patients at the time of presentation [126]. Metastatic cranial manifestations most often present as osseous lesions involving the calvaria, orbit, or skull base [127], with neuroblastoma being the commonest metastasis to the skull in this age group [128].
At imaging, metastatic lesions of the skull produce several radiographic findings: thickened bone, the so-called “hair-on-end” periosteal reaction, lytic defects, and separation of sutures. The differential diagnosis of multiple lytic skull lesions in a child includes Langerhans cell histiocytosis, leukaemia, lymphoma, and sarcoma metastases [127,129]. Neuroblastoma has a predilection to metastasise to the dura and tends to favour the external surface of the dura (Figure 25). The dura acts as a defence mechanism to direct invasion, with intraparenchymal extension rarely seen [126]. Neuroblastoma often metastasises to the skull base and orbits in the late stages of the disease. Both LCH and metastatic neuroblastoma can involve the posterolateral part of the orbit [130].
Figure 25.
Five-year-old girl with stage IV metastatic neuroblastoma to the calvarium. A) Axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen shows a bulky and partially-calcified right adrenal neuroblastoma. B) Axial head CT on bone window shows a destructive lesion within the diploic space in the left frontal calvarium with soft tissue components (arrow). C) Axial T2-W image shows corresponding full thickness skull defect and hyperintense signal
Metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma
Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) is the second most common primary bone malignancy in children [131]. It can develop in any bone or tissue, but the most common location is long or flat bones. Primary ES of the skull is rare, with metastasis to the skull being more common [132]. The clinical presentation is usually pain and swelling. The imaging appearance of these tumours is very variable, but they are usually poorly marginated, with an aggressive appearance and extension into adjacent soft tissues. They show intense and heterogeneous enhancement (Figure 26).
Figure 26.
Calvarial metastasis in a 15-year-old boy with history of Ewing’s sarcoma of the left distal ulna. A) Sagittal STIR of the left forearm shows the heterogeneously hyperintense primary tumour of distal ulna with associated soft tissue involvement. B, C) Pre- and post-Gd T1-WI demonstrate a destructive calvarial metastasis with heterogeneously iso/hypointense FLAIR signal and avid gadolinium enhancement. D) Sagittal Gd-enhanced T1-WI shows avid enhancement. E, F) Axial DWI and ADC map shows mild true diffusion restriction
Vascular
Venous lakes
Transcalvarial venous channels consist of holes in the calvarium through which emissary veins pass, connecting the dural venous sinuses with veins external to the skull. They usually present as serpiginous or linear lucencies with sclerotic borders through the skull and are sometimes confounded with fractures or sutures [133]. When these veins are enlarged, they are known as venous lakes.
On CT imaging, they appear as round or oval lucent foci at the level of the inner table of the skull [134]. These show high signal on T2-weighted images and intermediate or low signal on T1-weighted images with marked enhancement after contrast administration (Figure 27).
Figure 27.
Seventeen-year-old boy with multiple venous lakes. A) Axial T2-W show multiple hyperintense lesions (arrows) involving the diploic spaces of the calvarium. B, C) Pre- and post-Gd-enhanced T1-W images show peripheral delayed enhancement
Venous malformation
Venous malformations consist of a wide range of congenital lesions which are clinically characterised by a soft and non-pulsatile bluish mass, occurring in the head and neck in 40% of cases [135].
Magnetic resonance imaging is the best modality to define lesion size and extent. They are often hyperintense on T2-weighted sequence, with internal septation and variable enhancement (Figure 28). Phleboliths, appearing as focal signal voids, are a specific characteristic [136]. As a low-flow lesion, flow voids seen with proliferating haemangiomas or high-flow arteriovenous malformations are not identified in venous malformations. Treatment typically involves some combination of sclerotherapy and surgical removal [135].
Figure 28.
Ten-year-old boy with large left parieto-occipital venous malformation with intracranial developmental venous anomalies. A) Axial T2-W and (B-D) post-Gd T1-W images show mixed T2 high signal lesion with corresponding intense contrast enhancement along left parietal calvarium (arrows in A and B) extending intracranially at occipital and suboccipital regions (arrowhead). Also noted is an associated complex intracranial developmental venous malformation with enlarged veins (arrow in C)
Post-operative
Post-operative intraosseous pseudomeningocele
Intradiploic pseudomeningocele are very rare post-operative or post-traumatic complications in paediatric patients [137-139]. They are characterised by a breach of the inner table with a tear of dura mater, with intradiploic accumulation of CSF in a sac with a covering lined by arachnoid membrane. The time interval between trauma and diagnosis of post-traumatic intradiploic pseudomeningocele is variable, ranging from 10 months to 50 years [140-142], with the occipital region being the most common location.
On plain radiograph of the skull, they appear as an eggshell expansion of the diploic space with intact outer table. A CT scan best defines the extent of the bony defect and intactness of the outer table, with three-dimensional reconstruction aiding in surgical planning (Figure 29). MRI is the modality of choice and helps in the diagnosis by excluding dermoid and epidermoid cysts [141]. They typically have signal intensities similar to CSF. The differential diagnosis includes leptomeningeal cysts (Figure 30), which result from diastatic fractures causing laceration of dura mater as well as the inner and outer tables [143-145].
Figure 29.
Fifteen-year-old girl with Chiari malformation, status post suboccipital craniectomy for decompression and a post-op intraosseous pseudomeningocele. A) Axial head computed tomography shows an expansile fluid density intraosseous lesion separating the inner and outer table of the occipital calvarium. B) Axial T2-WI shows a suboccipital pseudomeningocele with cerebrospinal fluid signal and intraosseous extension. C) Coronal T1-W image shows changes of suboccipital craniectomy and pseudomeningocele (arrows)
Figure 30.
Companion case in an adult patient with history of prior trauma. A, B) Axial computed tomography (CT) images on bone and parenchyma windows show focal encephalomalacia of right frontoparietal lobe with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) extending and expanding the right parietal bone fracture. Note the scalloping of the fracture margins. C) Coronal CT image shows the extent of encephalomalacia and extension of CSF through the skull defect
Conclusions
Paediatric skull lesions often represent a diagnostic challenge to radiologists. However, if an appropriate imaging and clinically based approach is used, a definitive diagnosis is possible in the majority of cases. These lesions range from congenital, traumatic, infectious, and neoplastic to vascular. Many features of these lesions are important in management and may be discovered with proper imaging. A variety of cross-sectional imaging methods are now available that help characterise these lesions and guide therapy.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Dupuis O, Silveira R, Dupont C, et al. Comparison of “instrument associated” and “spontaneous” obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates. Am J Obstet Gyencol. 2005;192:165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guha-Ray DK. Intrauterine spontaneous depression of fetal skull: a case report and review of literature. J Reprod Med. 1976;16:321–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tavares LA, Kottamasu SR, Ezhuthacha SG, et al. Neonatal skull depression: review of four cases. J Perinatol. 1989;9:423–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tibbs RE, Lee DC, Parent AD. Depressed skull fracture. In: Batjer HH, Loftus CM, editors. Textbook of Neurological Surgery: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. pp. 1082–1095. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sunil K, Agrawal DM, Praveen Kumar DM, et al. Congenital depression of the skull in neonate: a case of successful conservative management. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:387–389. doi: 10.1177/0883073809338520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tovar-Spinoza S, Kim P. Congenital depressed skull fracture in the absence of trauma: case report and literature review. Dove Press J. 2012;2:11–14. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vidal Mico S, Lopez Navarro M, Téllez de Meneses M, et al. Spontaneous resolution of a congenital depressed skull fracture. An Esp Pediatr. 2004;54:78–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Axton J, Levy L. Congenital moulding depressions of the skull. Br Med J. 1965;1:1644–1647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5451.1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saunders B, Lazoritz S, McArtor R, et al. Depressed skull fracture in the neonate. J Neurosurg. 1979;50:512–514. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.50.4.0512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eisenberg D, Kirchner S, Perrin E. Neonatal skull depression unassociated with birth trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143:1063–1064. doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.5.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Doumouchtosis SK, Arulkamaran S. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:129–134. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000192983.76976.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beyers N, Moosa A, Bryce RL, et al. Depressed skull fracture in the newborn. S Afr Med J. 1978;54:830–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hanlon L, Hogan B, Corcoran D, Ryan S. Congenital depression of the neonatal skull: a self limiting condition. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F272. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.082347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shamsian N, Robertson A, Anslow P. Congenital skull indentation: a case report and review of the literature. BMJ Case Reports. 2012;2012 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-6157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lenyoun EH, Lampert JA, Xipoleas GD, Taub PJ. Salvage of calvarial bone graft using acellular dermal matrix in nasal reconstruction and secondary rhinoplasty for frontonasal dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1378–1382. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821cc26d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu E, Vargevik K, Slavotinek AM. Subtypes of frontonasal dysplasia are useful in determining clinical prognosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:3069–3078. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fryburg JS, Persing JA, Lin KY. Frontonasal dysplasia in two successive generations. Am J Med Genet. 1993;46:712–714. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vaccarella F, Pini Prato A, Fasciolo A, et al. Phenotypic variability of Pai syndrome: report of two patients and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:1059–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fearon JA. Rare craniofacial 2008 clefts: a surgical classification. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:110–112. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31815ca1ba. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pham NS, Rafii A, Liu J, et al. Clinical and genetic characterization of frontorhiny: report of 3 novel cases and discussion of the surgical management. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13:415–420. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gaball CW, Yencha MW, Kosnik S. Frontonasal dysplasia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133:637–638. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martinelli P, Russo R, Agangi A, Paladini D. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of frontonasal dysplasia. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:375–379. doi: 10.1002/pd.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Posnick JC, Seagle MB, Armstrong D. Nasal reconstruction with full-thickness cranial bone grafts and rigid internal skeleton fixation through a coronal incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:894–902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Frieden IJ. Aplasia curls congenita: a clinical review and proposal for classification. Acad Dermatol. 1986;114:646–660. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(86)70082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sybert VP. Aplasia cutis congenita: a report of 12 new families and review of the literature. Pediatric Dermatol. 1985;3:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1985.tb00478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Croce EL, Purohit RC, Janovski NA. Congenital absence of the skin (aplasia cutis congenita) Arch Surg. 1973;106:732–734. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350170092025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wolpow ER, Schaumberg HH. Structure of the human arachnoid granulation. J Neurosurg. 1972;37:724–727. doi: 10.3171/jns.1972.37.6.0724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abbott R, Cutting CB, Wisoff JI-I, et al. Aplasia cutis congenita of the scalp: issues in its management. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1991-1992;17:182–184. doi: 10.1159/000120592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schneider BM, Berg RA, Kaplan AM. Aplasia cutis congenita complicated by sagittal sinus hemorrhage. Pediatrics. 1980;66:948–950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wexler A, Harris M, Lesavoy M. Conservative treatment of cutis aplasia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:1066–1071. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199012000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vinocur CD, Weintraub WH, Wilensky RJ. Surgical management of aplasia cutis congenita. Arch Surg. 1976;111:1160–1164. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360280118019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Demmel U. Clinical aspects of congenital skin defects: I. Congenital skin defects on the head of the newborn. II. Congenital skin defects on the trunk and extremities of the newborn. III. Causal and formal genesis of congenital skin defects of the newborn. Eur J Pediatr. 1975;121:21–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00464392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.O’Brien BM, Drake JE. Congenital defects of skull and scalp. Br J Plast Surg. 1960;13:102–109. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(60)80026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kosnik EJ, Sayers MP. Congenital scalp defects: aplasia cutis congenita. J Neurosurg. 1975;42:32–36. doi: 10.3171/jns.1975.42.1.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Broomhead IW. Congenital defects of the scalp. In: Mustard JC, Jackson IT, editors. Plastic surgery in infancy and childhood. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. pp. 451–454. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muakassa KF, King RB, Stark DB. Neurosurgical approach to congenital scalp and skull defects. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:711–715. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.5.0711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aknin J, Seguin R, Brunon J, Oulhchane M. Skin aplasia of the vertex. Report of a familial form. Rev Stomatol Chit Maxillofac. 1992;93:267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Spear SL, Mickle JP. Simultaneous cutis aplasia congenita of the scalp and cranial stenosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71:413–417. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198303000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Arand AG, Ball WS, Crone KR. Congenital scalp defects: Adams-Oliver syndrome. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1991-1992;17:203–207. doi: 10.1159/000120598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pozzati E, Padovanie R, Frank F, Gaist G. Leptomeningeal angiomatosis and aplasia congenita of the scalp: case report. J Neurosurg. 1983;58:937–940. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.6.0937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vasconez LO. Congenital defect of the skull and scalp due to an arteriovenous malformation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:692–695. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197306000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ktister W, Lenz W, Kiriiinen H, Majewski F. Congenital scalp defects with distal limb anomalies (Adams-Oliver syndrome): report of ten cases and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1988;31:99–115. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320310112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Turner L. The structure of arachnoid granulations with observations on their physiologic and pathological significance. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1961;29:237–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.LeGros Clark WE. On the pacchionian bodies. J Anat. 1920;55:40–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Key A, Retzius G. Stadien in der Anatomie des Nerven systems und des Bind egenwebes. Stockholm: Norstedt and Soner; 1876. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Browder J, Kaplan H, Howard J. Hyperplasia of pacchionian granulations. Arch Pathol. 1973;95:315–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Krisch B. Ultrastructure of the meninges at the site of penetration of veins through the dura mater, with particular reference to pacchionian granulations: investigations in the rat and two species of New-World monkeys (Cebus apella, Callitrix jacchus) Cell Tissue Res. 1988;251:621–631. doi: 10.1007/BF00214011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Upton ML, Weller RO. The morphology of cerebrospinal fluid drainage pathways in human arachnoid granulations. J Neurosurg. 1985;63:867–875. doi: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS. Surgical Pathology of the Brain and its Coverings. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. Intracranial meninges; pp. 89–93. [Google Scholar]
- 50.McLendon RE, Tien RD. Russell and Rubinstein’s Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of maldevelopmental origin; pp. 327–352. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Osborn AG. Diagnostic Imaging: Brain. Salt Lake City: Amirsys; 2004. Arachnoid cyst; pp. I–7-4. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Osborn AG. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. Miscellaneous tumors, cysts, and metastases; pp. 631–649. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rao G, Anderson R, Feldstein NA, Brockmeyer DL. Expansion of arachnoid cysts in children: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(3 Suppl):314–317. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.102.3.0314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Falcone C, Tinelli E, Pierallini A, et al. Spontaneous disappearance of juxta-sylvian cyst: MRI study and clinical evaluations. Riv Neuroradiol. 2005;18:54–58. [In Italian] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Naidich TP, Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT. Midface: embryology and congenital lesions. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head and Neck Imaging. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. pp. 3–60. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lowe LH, Booth TN, Joglar JM, Rollins NK. Midface anomalies in children. Radiographics. 2000;20:907–922. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl07907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Annet L, Durez T, Grandin C, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements within intracranial epidermoid cysts in six patients. Neuroradiology. 2002;44:326–328. doi: 10.1007/s00234-001-0726-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rahbar R, Shah P, Mulliken JB, et al. The presentation and management of nasal dermoid: a 30-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:464–471. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.4.464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fink AM, Maixner W. Enlarged parietal foramina: MR imaging features in the fetus and neonate. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1379–1381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Little BB, Knoll KA, Klein VR, et al. Hereditary cranium bifidum and symmetric parietal foramina are the same entity. Am J Med Genetics. 1990;35:453–458. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320350402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wuyts W, Reardon W, Preis S, et al. Identification of mutations in the MSX2 homeobox gene in families affected with foramina parietalia permagna. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:1251–1255. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.8.1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Valente M, Valente KD, Sugayama SSM, et al. Malformation of cortical and vascular development in one family with parietal foramina determined by an ALX4 homeobox gene mutation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1836–1839. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Barkovich AJ, Vandermarck P, Edwards MS, Cogen PH. Congenital nasal masses: CT and MR imaging features in 16 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:105–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Naidich TP, Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT. Midface: embryology and congenital lesions. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head and Neck Imaging. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. pp. 3–60. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Martinez-Lage JF, Poza M, Sola J, et al. The child with a cephalocele: etiology, neuroimaging, and outcome. Childs Nerv Syst. 1996;12:540–550. doi: 10.1007/BF00261608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Naidich TP, Braffman BH, McLone DG, Zimmerman RA. Cephaloceles and related malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:655–690. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mahapatra AK, Suri A. Anterior encephaloceles: a study of 92 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002;36:113–118. doi: 10.1159/000048365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Barkovich JA. Pediatric Neuroimaging. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1995. Congenital malformations of the brain and skull; pp. 177–275. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hoving EW. Nasal encephaloceles. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000;16:702–706. doi: 10.1007/s003810000339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Raman Sharma R, Mahapatra AK, Pawar SJ, et al. Trans-sellar trans-sphenoidal encephaloceles: report of two cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2002;9:89–92. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lai SY, Kennedy DW, Bolger WE. Sphenoid encephaloceles: disease management and identification of lesions within the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:1800–1805. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Patterson RJ, Egelhoff JC, Crone KR, Ball WS., Jr Atretic parietal cephaloceles revisited: an enlarging clinical and imaging spectrum? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:791–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Brunelle F, Baraton J, Renier D, et al. Intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic cephaloceles. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:743–747. doi: 10.1007/s002470000328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Desai V, Priyadarshini SR, Sharma R. Copper Beaten Skull! Can It be a Usual Appearance? Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;7:47–49. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Virchow R. Uber den Cretinismus, namentlich in Franken, und uber pathologische Schadelformen. Verh Phys Med Gessellschr Wurzbg. 1851;2:230–271. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Derderian C, Seaward J. Syndromic craniosynostosis. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26:64–75. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sharma VP, Fenwick AL, Brockop MS, et al. Mutations in TCF12, encoding a basic helix-loop-helix partner of TWIST1, are a frequent cause of coronal craniosynostosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45:304–307. doi: 10.1038/ng.2531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Reardon WW, Rutland R, Pulleyn P, et al. Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene cause Crouzon syndrome. Nat Genet. 1994;8:98–103. doi: 10.1038/ng0994-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Connolly JP, Gruss J, Seto ML, et al. Progressive postnatal craniosynostosis and increased intracranial pressure. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1313–1323. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000111593.96440.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rasmussen SA, Friedman JM. NF1 gene and neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:33–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Newton TH, Potts DG. Radiology of the Skull and Brain. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1971. pp. 235–608. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kao HC, Huang YC, Lin TY. Infected cephalohematoma associated with sepsis and skull osteomyelitis: report of one case. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16:459–462. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-6803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Firlik KS, Adelson PD. Large chronic cephalohematoma without calcification. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;30:39–42. doi: 10.1159/000028759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Goodwin MD, Persing JA, Duncan CC, Shin JH. Spontaneously infected cephalohematoma: case report and review of the literature. J Craniofac Surg. 2000;11:371–375. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200011040-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Verbon A, Husni RN, Gordon SM, et al. Pott’s puffy tumor due to Haemophilus influenzae: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:1305–1307. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.6.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kung SW, Chang DT, Suen PY, et al. Pott’s puffy tumour. Hong Kong Med J. 2002;8:381–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Shah MV, Haines SJ. Pediatric skull, skull base, and meningeal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1992;3:893–924. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Soft tissue tumors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1983. pp. 78–83. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rosenberg HS, Stenback WA, Spjut HJ. The fibromatoses of infancy and childhood. Perspect Pediatr Pathol. 1978;4:269–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wiswell TE, Sakas EL, Stephenson SR, et al. Infantile myofibromatosis. Pediatrics. 1985;76:981–984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Koujok K, Ruiz RE, Hernandez RJ. Myofibromatosis: imaging characteristics. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:374–380. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1357-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chung EB, Enzinger FM. Infantile myofibromatosis. Cancer. 1981;48:1807–1818. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19811015)48:8<1807::aid-cncr2820480818>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Baer JW, Radkowski MA. Congenital multiple fibromatosis. A case report with review of the world literature. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973;118:200–205. doi: 10.2214/ajr.118.1.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Mizobuchi K, Yoshino T, Ikehara I, et al. Infantile myofibromatosis. Report of two cases. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1986;36:1411–1418. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1986.tb02863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Okamoto K, Ito J, Takahashi H, et al. Solitary myofibromatosis of the skull. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:170–174. doi: 10.1007/s003300050028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Queralt JA, Poirier VC. Solitary infantile myofibromatosis of the skull. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:476–478. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hasegawa T, Hirose T, Seki K, et al. Solitary infantile myofibromatosis of bone. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:308–313. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199303000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Inwards CY, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Shives TC. Solitary congenital fibromatosis (infantile myofibromatosis) of bone. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:935–941. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199110000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Agrawal V, Ludwig N, Agrawal A, Bulsara KR. Intraosseous intracranial meningioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:314–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tokgoz N, Oner YA, Kaymaz M, et al. Primary intraosseous meningioma: CT and MRI appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2053–2056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gibson SE, Prayson RA. Primary skull lesions in the pediatric population: a 25-year experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:761–766. doi: 10.5858/2007-131-761-PSLITP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Reigel D, Quigley M, Lin L. Pediatric skull tumors. In: McLaurin R, Schut L, Venes J, editors. Pediatric Neurosurgery. Surgery of the Developing Nervous System. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1989. p. 421. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schneider RC, Gabrielsen TO, Hicks SP. Calvarial hemangioma. The value of selective external carotid angiography in surgical excision of the lesion. Neurology. 1973;23:352–356. doi: 10.1212/wnl.23.4.352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Murphey MD, Fairbairn KJ, Parman LM, et al. Musculoskeletal angiomatous lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1995;15:893–917. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.15.4.7569134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ortiz O, Schochet S, Bastug D. Imaging evaluation and clinicopathotolic correlation of mass lesions involving the calvaria. Part II: tumoral and inflammatory lesions. Int J Neuroradiol. 1999;5:151–165. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Politi M, Romeike BFM, Papanagiotou P, et al. Intraosseous hemangioma of the skull with dural tail sign: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2045–2052. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Koulouris G, Rao P. Multiple congenital cranial hemangiomas. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:485–489. doi: 10.1007/s00256-004-0891-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Navarro OM, Laffan EE, Ngan BY. Pediatric soft-tissue tumors and pseudotumors: MR imaging features with pathologic correlation. I. Imaging approach, pseudotumors, vascular lesions, and adipocytic tumors. Radiographics. 2009;29:887–906. doi: 10.1148/rg.293085168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ernemann U, Kramer U, Miller S, et al. Current concepts in the classification, diagnosis and treatment of vascular anomalies. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Moukaddam H, Pollak J, Haims AH. MRI characteristics and classification of peripheral vascular malformations and tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:535–547. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0609-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Berenguer B, Mulliken JB, Enjolras O, et al. Rapidly involuting congenital hemangioma: clinical and histopathologic features. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6:495–510. doi: 10.1007/s10024-003-2134-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dubois J, Garel L. Imaging and therapeutic approach of hemangiomas and vascular malformations in the pediatric age group. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:879–893. doi: 10.1007/s002470050718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Dubois J, Alison M. Vascular anomalies: what a radiologist needs to know. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:895–905. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1621-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Abernethy LJ. Classification and imaging of vascular malformations in children. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2483–2497. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1773-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Siegelman SS. Taking the X out of histiocytosis X. Radiology. 1997;204:322–324. doi: 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Egeler RM, D’Angio GJ. Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr. 1995;127:1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70248-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.DiNardo LJ, Wetmore RF. Head and neck manifestations of histiocytosis-X in children. Laryngoscope. 1989;99:721–724. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198907000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ghanem I, Tolo VT, D’Ambra P, Malogalowkin MH. Langerhans cell histiocytosis of bone in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:124–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Irving RM, Broadbent V, Jones NS. Langerhans’cell histiocytosis in childhood: management of head and neck manifestations. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:64–70. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199401000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Meyer JS, Harty MP, Mahboubi S, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis: presentation and evolution of radiologic findings with clinical correlation. RadioGraphics. 1995;15:1135–1146. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.15.5.7501855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Howarth DM, Gilchrist GS, Mullan BP, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis: diagnosis, natural history, management, and outcomes. Cancer. 1999;85:2278–2290. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2278::aid-cncr25>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Koch BL. Langerhans histiocytosis of temporal bone: role of magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:66–74. doi: 10.1097/00002142-200002000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ochsner SF. Eosinophilic granuloma of the bone: experience with 20 cases. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1966;97:719–726. doi: 10.2214/ajr.97.3.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Huvos AG. Clinicopathologic spectrum of osteogenic sarcoma. Recent observations. Pathol Annu. 1979;14(Pt 1):123–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Deutsch M. Radiation therapy in the treatment of tumors of the cranial base. In: Sekhar LN, Schramm VL, editors. Tumors of the Cranial Base. New York: Futura; 1987. p. 163. [Google Scholar]
- 126.Chirathivat S, Post MJ. CT demonstration of dural metastases in neuroblastoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1980;4:316–319. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198006000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk L. CT of primary and secondary craniocerebral neuroblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135:1239–1242. doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.6.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Healy JF, Bishop J, Rosenkrantz H. Cranial computed tomography in the detection of dural, orbital, and skull involvement in metastatic neuroblastoma. J Comput Tomogr. 1981;5:319–323. doi: 10.1016/0149-936x(81)90069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Latchaw RE, L’Heureux PR, Young G, Priest JR. Neuroblastoma presenting as central nervous system disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1982;3:623–630. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.D’Ambrosio N, Soohoo S, Warshall C, et al. Craniofacial and intracranial manifestations of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: report of findings in 100 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:589–597. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Stiller CA, Bielack SS, Jundt G, Steliarova-Foucher E. Bone tumours in European children and adolescents, 1978-1997. Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2124–2135. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hadfield MG, Luo VY, Williams RL, et al. Ewing’s sarcoma of the skull in an infant. A case report and review. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996;25:100–104. doi: 10.1159/000121104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kiritsi O, Noussios G, Tsitas K, et al. Anatomical variants of the emissary veins: unilateral aplasia of both, the sigmoid sinus and the internal jugular vein and development of the petrosquamosal sinus. A rare case report. Folia Morfol. 2011;70:305–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Hershkovitz I, Greenwald C, Rothschild BM, et al. The elusive diploic veins: anthropological and anatomical perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999;108:345–358. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199903)108:3<345::AID-AJPA9>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Dubois J, Garel L. Imaging and therapeutic approach of hemangiomas and vascular malformations in the pediatric age group. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:879–893. doi: 10.1007/s002470050718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Fordham LA, Chung CJ, Donnelly LF. Imaging of congenital vascular and lymphatic anomalies of the head and neck. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2000;10:117–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Peyser E, Weissberg D. Post-traumatic arachnoidal cyst. Report of an unusual case. J Neurosurg. 1961;18:551–553. doi: 10.3171/jns.1961.18.4.0551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sartawi M, Schwartz FT, Fox JL. An unusual osteolytic lesion of the skull due to a traumatic arachnoid cyst. Neuroradiology. 1973;6:180–181. doi: 10.1007/BF00335318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Scarfò GB, Mariottini A, Tomaccini D, Palma L. Growing skull fractures: progressive evolution of brain damage and effectiveness of surgical treatment. Childs Nerv Syst. 1989;5:163–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00272120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Mahapatra AK, Tandon PN. Post-traumatic intradiploic pseudomeningocele in children. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1989;100:120–126. doi: 10.1007/BF01403598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Agrawal D, Mishra S. Post-traumatic intradiploic pseudomeningocele. Indian Pediatrics. 2010;47:271–273. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0036-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Sato TS, Moritani T, Hitchon P. Occipital intradiploic CSF pseudocyst: an unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:635–636. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Martínez-Lage JF, Martínez Pérez M, Domingo R, Poza M. Posttraumatic intradiploic arachnoid cyst of the posterior fossa. Childs Nerv Syst. 1997;13:293–296. doi: 10.1007/s003810050088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Goldstein FP, Rosenthal SA, Garancis JC, et al. Varieties of growing skull fractures in childhood. J Neurosurg. 1970;33:25–28. doi: 10.3171/jns.1970.33.1.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Goldstein F, Sakoda T, Kepes JJ, et al. Enlarging skull fractures: an experimental study. J Neurosurg. 1967;27:541–550. doi: 10.3171/jns.1967.27.6.0541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






























