Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2019 Feb 21;8(4):902–905. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00526

PLANT-Dx: A Molecular Diagnostic for Point-of-Use Detection of Plant Pathogens

M Verosloff †,, J Chappell , K L Perry §, J R Thompson §, J B Lucks †,∥,⊥,*
PMCID: PMC6479721  PMID: 30790518

Abstract

graphic file with name sb-2018-005263_0003.jpg

Synthetic biology based diagnostic technologies have improved upon gold standard diagnostic methodologies by decreasing cost, increasing accuracy, and enhancing portability. However, there has been little effort in adapting these technologies toward applications related to point-of-use monitoring of plant and crop health. Here, we take a step toward this vision by developing an approach that couples isothermal amplification of specific plant pathogen genomic sequences with customizable synthetic RNA regulators that are designed to trigger the production of a colorimetric output in cell-free gene expression reactions. We demonstrate our system can sense viral derived sequences with high sensitivity and specificity, and can be utilized to directly detect viruses from infected plant material. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the entire system can operate using only body heat and naked-eye visual analysis of outputs. We anticipate these strategies to be important components of user-friendly and deployable diagnostic systems that can be configured to detect a range of important plant pathogens.

Keywords: point-of-use diagnostics, cell free synthetic biology, plant viruses, crop pathogens, RNA synthetic biology, isothermal amplification


Synthetic biology has recently contributed to multiple advances in point-of-use nucleic acid diagnostic (PoUD) technologies.1 These technologies leverage isothermal strategies to amplify target nucleic acids, with new advances in detection of these targets using strand-displacement,2 or CRISPR-based methods3,4 that produce fluorescent readouts, or RNA toehold switches that control translation of enzymes that produce colored compounds.5 Overall these technologies can be used for sensitive detection of pathogen-derived nucleic acids in complex matrices in field-deployable formats that significantly improve upon current laboratory-intensive PCR-based approaches.

To date, most synthetic biology diagnostic efforts have focused on detecting pathogens that impact human health. However, there is great potential to leverage these technologies for detecting plant pathogens. In the United States alone, plant pathogens account for an estimated $33 billion annual loss in agricultural productivity.6 Worldwide, losses in crop yields due to plant pathogens can be more severe and contribute to food scarcity and famine.7 Among plant pathogens, wide host range viral species such as cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and potato virus Y (PVY) are particularly devastating, as they infect hundreds of plant species, including agriculturally important species such as beans, maize, and potatoes.8 PoUDs are an important component of strategies to combat the impacts of these pathogens, as timely identification can lead to the rapid deployment of methods for mitigation and containment. However, current plant pathogen PoUD strategies use a range of approaches, including antibody-based detection, which lacks sensitivity,9 or isothermal amplification, which by itself does not generate convenient visual outputs, that are amenable to field use.

To address these shortcomings, we sought to develop a PoUD system called PLANT-Dx (Point-of-use LAboratory for Nucleic acids in a Tube) that combines the sensitivity of isothermal strategies to amplify target plant pathogen nucleic acids,10 with the designability of synthetic gene regulatory systems11 and the robustness of cell-free gene expression reactions12 to produce colorimetric outputs that are visible to the naked-eye (Figure 1a). The overall approach of our PLANT-Dx system is to convert plant pathogen nucleic acids into constructs encoding designed synthetic RNA regulators that when produced activate an RNA genetic switch controlling the expression of an enzyme that catalyzes a color change. The RNA genetic switch thus serves a role as a signal processing layer that filters the noisy output of isothermal amplification products,10 only triggering the production of color for correctly amplified on-target viral sequences.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Basic operation of PLANT-Dx. (a) Schematic overview. Viral RNA is amplified by recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) into DNA templates that contain a T7 polymerase promoter (purple), a portion of a small transcription activating RNA (STAR) sequence (blue), and a portion of the viral RNA sequence (red). Cell-free expression of these templates produces viral sequence-derived STAR which triggers the production of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (CDO), which in turn converts catechol into hydroxymuconic semialdehyde, a yellow colored compound that is visible by the eye near a 385 nm absorbance value of 0.8 (dashed line, Figure S3, S4). (b) Demonstrated ability to detect cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) sequences from in vitro transcription (IVT) RNA products (orange) versus control (gray) samples, by 120 min across three different days. (c) Demonstrated ability to detect potato virus Y (PVY) based IVT RNA (orange) versus control (gray) samples by 120 min across three different days. (d) An orthogonality matrix of cell-free reactions challenging RPA products from different IVT sources against different STAR-Target-CDO constructs showing positive results (yellow) only for cognate combinations at 150 min. (e) Serial dilution of CMV IVT RNA was used to determine a limit of detection in between 44 pM and 4.4 pM after 150 min of reaction. (−) Template indicates a control in which no CMV IVT RNA was input into the RPA reaction. p-value comparison was made using a Student’s t test between the data from the 44 pM and (−) Template conditions. Data in (b), (c) represent mean values and error bars represent s.d. of n = 3 technical replicates. Data in (e) represent mean values (bars) of n = 3 biological replicates, each with n = 3 technical replicates (n = 9 total), plotted as individual points.

PLANT-Dx works by first using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA)13 (Figure S1) to amplify a target region of a plant pathogen genome to produce a double-stranded DNA construct that encodes the synthesis of a synthetic RNA regulator called a Small Transcription Activating RNA (STAR) (Figure S1).11 These DNA templates are then used to direct the transcription of STARs within a cell-free gene expression reaction,12 which when produced, activates the transcription of a STAR-regulated construct encoding the enzyme catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (CDO)14 (Figure 1a). Only when the pathogen is present is the RPA product made, leading to expression of CDO, which in turn converts the colorless catechol compound into a visible yellow product. Here we show that this design can detect CMV in infected plant lysate with a low picomolar sensitivity, and can be configured to detect nucleic acids from different viral genomes without crosstalk. In addition, we show that this design requires only simple mixing and body heat to induce a color change, which we anticipate will facilitate deployment to field settings.

Results

To develop PLANT-Dx, we first sought to create pathogen detecting molecular sensors based upon the Small Transcription Activating RNA (STAR) regulatory system.11 This transcription activation system is based upon conditional formation of a terminator hairpin located within a target RNA upstream of a gene to be regulated: alone, the terminator hairpin forms and interrupts transcription of the downstream gene, while in the presence of a specific trans-acting STAR the hairpin cannot form and transcription proceeds (Figure S2). Previous work showed that the STAR linear binding region can be changed to produce highly functional and orthogonal variants.15 Here we sought to utilize this by replacing the linear binding region with sequences derived from genomic pathogen RNA to create new viral sensors. To do this, we utilized the secondary structure prediction algorithm NUPACK to identify regions within the genomes of CMV and PVY, that are predicted computationally to be unstructured for target RNA design (Note S1).16 Once viral STARs were designed, reporter DNA constructs were then created in which these target sequences were placed downstream of a constitutive E. coli promoter and upstream of the CDO reporter gene coding sequence. We next designed RPA primer sets to amplify and transform a pathogen’s genomic material into a DNA construct capable of synthesizing a functional STAR. Specifically, a T7 promoter and antiterminator STAR sequence were added to the 5′ end of a reverse RPA primer, which when combined with a forward primer, amplified an approximately 80 nucleotide (nt) viral sequence to produce a double-stranded DNA encoding the designed STAR which contained the target viral sequence. In this way, we anticipated that combining the CDO-encoding reporter construct and RPA amplified DNA into a cell-free gene expression reaction12,17 would lead to the production of a detectable colorimetric output signal.

We began by investigating the ability of PLANT-Dx to detect the presence of in vitro transcribed (IVT) RNA designed to mimic specific target regions of CMV. We observed rapid color accumulation in samples containing 1 nM of purified transcription product versus the no-RNA negative control (Figure 1b). To test for modularity, we further developed sensors and primer sets for the detection of PVY, and confirmed function with the same assay (Figure 1c). The specificity of our system was also tested by interrogating the crosstalk between the product of various RPA reactions and noncognate molecular sensors. Specifically, we tested color production from cell-free reactions containing the reporter DNA construct for CMV with the PVY IVT-derived RPA product, as well as the converse, and found color production only between cognate pairs of input RPA and reporter constructs (Figure 1d). We next interrogated the inherent limit of detection of our system through titration of input IVT products (Figure 1e) and found it to be between 44pM and 4.4pM of input IVT RNA material. This demonstrated our ability to detect the presence of target nucleic acid sequences down to the picomolar range. Surprisingly, this sensitivity is lower than that previously reported for RPA3 and is most likely due to loss in amplification efficiency from the addition of the long overhangs present within our primer sets.

We next set out to determine whether this methodology was able to differentiate between plant lysate obtained from healthy plants versus lysate from plants infected with CMV virus. To test this, we input 1 μL of CMV-infected plant lysate, or an equivalent volume of a noninfected plant lysate control, into the PLANT-Dx reaction system. Here, we observed rapid color change only from reactions with infected lysate when compared to healthy lysate (Figure 2a). Interestingly, the leak in the system was reduced when challenged with plant extract in comparison to previous results using IVT product. This is most likely due to a slightly inhibitory effect plant lysate may have on the efficiency of the RPA reaction and presents a positive benefit of reducing off target signal production. Despite the great benefits derived from colorimetric enzymes, their usage dictates that any leak in the system will eventually result in the complete conversion of substrate into a visible signal. Therefore, it is important to determine a time point cutoff in which to analyze data for the presence or absence of the color signal to minimize false positives associated with expression leak. In this work using PLANT-Dx for detection of CMV, we suggest utilizing 150 min (Figure 1a). To demonstrate that this assay can be monitored by eye, reactions were carried out and filmed within a 31 °C incubator (Figure 2b). With the naked eye, we detected accumulation of a yellow color only within reactions that were incubated with infected lysate, while no such production was observed in reactions with uninfected lysate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Implementing a PLANT-Dx diagnostic. (a) PLANT-Dx reactions were used to detect CMV from infected N. tabacum derived lysate (orange) versus uninfected plant-derived lysate (gray), across three different days. Data displayed as in Figure 1b,c. (b) Time lapse photos of cell-free reactions containing RPA products from CMV infected lysate (+) or uninfected lysate (−). (c) Demonstration that PLANT-Dx can operate using only body heat as a heat source. RPA and cell-free reactions were run by taping tubes on the inner arm for 40 and 150 min, respectively. A yellow color was observed for the CMV-infected lysate sample (+) and not the uninfected lysate control (−). Data in (a) represent mean values, and error bars represent s.d. of n = 3 technical replicates.

A notable drawback of current gold standard diagnostics is the need for peripheral equipment for either amplification or visualization of outputs. Even simple heating elements for controlled incubations are a major hindrance during deployment within the field and can be cost-prohibitive. We sought to exploit the flexible temperature requirements of both RPA and cell-free gene expression reactions by attempting to run our diagnostic reactions for CMV infected lysate using only body heat. This resulted in clear yellow color only in the presence of infected lysate, with no major difference observed between these reactions and those previously incubated within a thermocycler and observed with a plate reader (Figure 2c).

Discussion

Here we have demonstrated a novel scheme for combining isothermal amplification and custom synthetic biology viral sensors for the detection of the important plant pathogen CMV from infected plant lysate. Building off of previously elucidated STAR design rules,15 we have shown that our molecular sensors can be efficiently designed, built, and implemented for use in this important plant diagnostic context. The use of STARs in PLANT-Dx complements previous uses of toehold translational switches for similar purposes in human viral diagnostics,5 and could lead to more powerful combinations of the two technologies in the future. In addition, we have shown that these reactions can be readily run without the need for extraneous heating or visualization equipment. In particular, the rapid mechanical disruption of infected leaf tissue into a reaction-ready lysate buffer eliminates the need for any nucleic acid isolation. While in these experiments the lysate was snap-frozen, they could equally be used for immediate analysis in the field. The ability of our methodology to selectively detect genomic sequences from CMV and PVY highlight the ability of the growing methodologies and design principles within RNA synthetic biology18 to contribute to real world applications. Further modifications to sample preparation will undoubtedly be needed to simplify the user interface still further while improving the sensitivity of detection of lower replicating and genetically more diverse virus species. We hope that these developments can be incorporated within other synthetic biology-based diagnostic platforms5 to enable PoUDs to be developed and delivered to regions of the world that need them most.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Khalid Alam for help in ensuring reproducibility and proofreading of this manuscript, and Dr. Melissa Takahashi for inspiring the combination of RPA and STARs for pathogen detection. This work was supported by an NSF CAREER Award (1452441 to J.B.L.), Searle Funds at the Chicago Community Trust (to J.B.L.), and a Grand Challenges Explorations Grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1199439 to J.B.L.).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00526.

  • Supporting methods, figures, tables and references (PDF)

Author Contributions

M.V., J.C., K.P., J.T., and J.B.L. designed the study. M.V. and J.T. performed the experiments. M.V. and J.B.L. performed the data analysis. All authors contributed to the preparation of this manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

sb8b00526_si_001.pdf (337.3KB, pdf)

References

  1. Slomovic S.; Pardee K.; Collins J. (2015) Synthetic Biology Devices for In Vitro and In Vivo Diagnostics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (47), 14429–35. 10.1073/pnas.1508521112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhadra S.; Jiang Y.; Kumar M.; Johnson R.; Hensley L.; Ellington A. (2015) Real-Time Sequence-Validated Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). PLoS One 10 (4), e0123126. 10.1371/journal.pone.0123126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gootenberg J.; Abudayyeh O. O.; Lee J. W.; Essletzbichler P.; Dy A. J.; Joung J.; Verdine V.; Donghia N.; Daringer N. M.; Freije C. A.; et al. (2017) Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 356, 438. 10.1126/science.aam9321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J.; Ma E.; Harrington L.; Da Costa M.; Tian X.; Palefsky J.; Doudna J. (2018) CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 360, 436. 10.1126/science.aar6245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pardee K.; Green A. A.; Takahash M. K.; Braff D.; Lambert G.; Lee J. W.; Ferrante T.; Ma D.; Donghia N.; Fan M.; et al. (2016) Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell 165 (5), 1255–66. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pimentel D.; Zuniga R.; Morrison D. (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasion species in the United States. Ecological Economics. 52, 273–88. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nicaise V. (2014) Crop immunity against viruses: outcomes and future challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scholthof K.; Adkins S.; Czosnek H.; Palukaitis P.; Jacquot E.; Hohn T.; Hohn B.; Saunders K.; Candresse T.; Ahlquist P.; et al. (2011) Top 10 Plant Viruses in Molecular Plant Pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 12, 938–54. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00752.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrne B.; Stack E.; Gilmartin N.; O'Kennedy R. (2009) Antibody Based Biosensors: Principals, Problems and potential for Detection of Pathogens and Associated Toxins. Sensors 9, 4407. 10.3390/s90604407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yan L.; Zhou J.; Zheng Y.; Gamson A. S.; Roembke B. T.; Nakayama S.; Sintim H. O. (2014) Isothermal Amplified detection of DNA and RNA. Mol. BioSyst. 10, 970–1003. 10.1039/c3mb70304e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chappell J.; Takahashi M.; Lucks J. (2015) Creating Small Transcription Activating RNAs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 214–20. 10.1038/nchembio.1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Silverman A.; Kelley-Loughnane N.; Lucks J. B.; Jewett M. C. (2019) Deconstructing Cell-Free Extract Preparation for In-Vitro Activation of Transcriptional Genetic Circuitry. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 403. 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Piepenburg O.; Williams C.; Stemple D.; Armes N. (2006) DNA Detection Using Recombination Proteins. PLoS Biol. 4 (7), e204. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clayton T.; Bibb M. (1990) Streptomyces promoter-probe plasmids that utilize the xylE gene of Pseudomonas putida. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 1077. 10.1093/nar/18.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chappell J.; Westbrook A.; Verosloff M.; Lucks J. (2017) Computational Design of Small Transcription Activating RNAs for Versatile and Dynamic Gene Regulation. Nat. Commun. 10.1038/s41467-017-01082-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zadeh J.; Steenberg C. D.; Bois J. S.; Wolfe B. R.; Pierce M. B.; Khan A. R.; Dirks R. M.; Pierce N. A. (2011) NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 170–173. 10.1002/jcc.21596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Garamella J.; Marshall R.; Rustad M.; Noireaux V. (2016) The All E. Coli TX-TL Toolbox 2.0: A platform for Cell-Free Synthetic Biology. ACS Synth. Biol. 5 (4), 344–55. 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlson P.; Lucks J. (2018) Elements of RNA Design. Biochemistry 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sb8b00526_si_001.pdf (337.3KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Synthetic Biology are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES