Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1964 Sep-Oct;68A(5):465–487. doi: 10.6028/jres.068A.045

Infrared Spectra of the Crystalline Inorganic Borates

C E Weir, R A Schroeder
PMCID: PMC6481887  PMID: 31834733

Abstract

Infrared absorption spectra of anhydrous, crystalline, inorganic borates were obtained in the 2000 cm−1 to 300 cm−1 range. Compounds with B10 and B11 isotopes were prepared to assist interpretation. Spectral bands for all orthoborates and pyroborates and some metaborates could be assigned satisfactorily. Borates with complex ring-type anions generally exhibited spectra of such complexity that only superficial interpretation was attempted. From correlations between spectra and structure it appears that boron in 3-fold or in 4-fold coordination can be identified with reasonable assurance on the basis of the infrared spectrum alone. Absorption bands are tabulated for about 80 borates and typical spectra are shown.

1. Introduction

The chemistry of systems containing boron oxide and the structures of glassy and crystalline inorganic borates are of considerable interest in this laboratory. In such work it is evident that the information available from infrared spectroscopy should be of considerable value. Such spectra are easily and rapidly obtained on very small quantities of material and contain direct information on the nature of the borate anion, the coordination of the boron, the strength of the B—O bonds, etc. Although this information is implicit in the absorption spectrum, an explicit derivation of the desired data requires a thorough understanding of the spectrum which is rarely available for any crystalline solid. This work is designed to advance the understanding of the spectra of the crystalline anhydrous borates by recording and correlating the spectrum with the structure of the crystal where this is known. Most structures are unknown so that the data obtained must be interpreted by comparisons, wherever possible, with spectra of crystals whose structure is known.

In addition to the general interest in borates, there is a specific interest here in crystals containing planar trigonal ions. Previous studies on the infrared spectra of carbonates, nitrates, and borates [57] 1 showed many close similarities, but demonstrated a striking difference in the spectra of the borates and the carbonate having the vaterite structure. The reason for the difference was left unresolved. Numerous absorption bands were found in low temperature spectra [48] of single crystals of carbonates and nitrates. These were attributed to combinations of fundamentals and lattice modes. The present survey was considered to be a preliminary requirement to a proposed study of crystals of the borates at low temperatures.

Previous work on the spectra of the borates will not be reviewed in detail here because the majority of such work consists of reports on only one or two materials. Such references will be discussed in connection with specific spectra. The only comprehensive study of the infrared spectra of anhydrous borates appears to be the recent work of Hart and Smallwood [18]. They studied a large number of borates, but the frequency range used did not extend to sufficiently low frequencies to observe all the fundamental vibrations of interest here. Hart and Smallwood concluded that assignment and interpretation of the more complex spectra was rather difficult. They did not examine several borates for which detailed crystal structures have been reported recently.

In this report, data are tabulated for infrared absorption bands of a number of inorganic borates. In many instances isotopic substitution was employed to assist in the interpretation of the spectra. The data are interpreted in terms of the structure of the anion wherever this is possible.

2. Experimental Method

Infrared spectra were obtained with a double-beam dual-grating spectrometer covering the range 2000 cm−1 to 200 cm−1. Higher frequencies were not employed because it was known [18] that fundamentals and most strong overtones and combination bands did not fall above 2000 cm−1 in the crystalline compounds. Dry air was circulated through the spectrometer to eliminate interference from atmospheric moisture in the 400 cm−1 region. Although the range of the spectrometer extended to 200 cm−1 a practical limit of 300 cm−1 appeared to be imposed by the available energy.

Spectra were obtained under two conditions, first as a suspension in light petroleum oil, and second as a film produced by evaporation of a CCl4 suspension. Both KBr and CsBr windows were used with a similar window being placed in the reference beam in all experiments. Mull spectra were used principally in the 1100 cm−1 to 300 cm−1 region while film spectra were found useful in the region above 1000 cm−1 where some interference by absorption in the mineral oil occurred. In the case of film spectra it was frequently found useful to expand the absorption peaks along the intensity axis, a similar expansion for the suspension was not possible because of the undesirable magnification of weak absorption bands in the oil. In the region where the two spectra overlapped the positions of absorption bands frequently showed discrepancies of at most 2 cm−1. Under these circumstances the mull spectra were assumed to be correct and a linear correction applied to the absorption bands of the film spectra. The correction is probably not linear if it arises from solubility effects in the alkali halide. However, the corrections are quite small and are not expected to affect the tabulated data appreciably.

3. Preparation of Borates

Borates were prepared using orthoboric acid and the metal carbonate or the metal oxide if the carbonate was unavailable. To reduce the loss of boric acid on ignition most reactions were initiated in aqueous suspensions. The residue on evaporation was subjected to several cycles of heating and grinding until reaction was judged to be complete. For most materials the maximum temperature employed was below the solidus temperature reported in the corresponding phase diagram. However, in the preparation of the alkali borates which crystallized as hydrates from solution, those specimens which melted congruently were melted prior to use. The resulting glasses were crystallized at temperatures below the melting points. The alkali borates that melted incongruently were dehydrated for 24 hr at temperatures 10–20 deg C below the reported incongruent melting points.

For isotope enrichment studies, specimens were prepared using H3B11O3 (98.3% B11) and H3B10O3 (96.5% B10) which were obtained from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Such pairs of specimens were synthesized in a limited number of cases, usually one for each major structure type expected except in the alkaline earth borates where more were prepared.

Powder x-ray diffraction patterns were obtained on all preparations. The diffraction patterns were checked against reported results where these were available. In many instances powder diffraction data were not available but the x-ray data served to check for contamination by metal oxide or related borates. In many instances the purity of the preparation was checked by means of a polarizing microscope.

In describing the composition of the borates prepared, the following system will be used here and to some extent throughout the paper: The molar ratios will be given with the metal oxide first and the borate as B2O3 last. Thus a 4:1 compound will contain 4 moles of metal oxide and 1 mole of boric oxide. Using this convention the following borates were prepared:

  1. Lithium borates 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, and 1:5 were prepared using the data of Mazzetti and Carli [38] as modified by Sastry and Hummel [46]. The recent data of Rollet and Bouaziz [45] which show additional 3:1 and 3:2 compounds could not be verified.

  2. Sodium borates 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4 were synthesized in accordance with the phase diagram given by Morey and Merwin [40]. It should be noted that these authors report a 2:1 compound although it is not shown on the phase diagram.

  3. Potassium borates 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, and 1:5 were prepared using the data of Rollet [44].

  4. Calcium borates 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, and 1:2 were prepared in accordance with the diagram given by Carlson [9].

  5. Strontium borates 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, and 1:2 were prepared. A phase diagram for the system does not appear to be available to date although Hart and Smallwood [18] apparently have phase equilibrium data. The 1:4 compound corresponding to a known barium borate does not appear to exist.

  6. Barium borates 3:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 were prepared in accordance with the results of Levin and McMurdie [34].

  7. Magnesium borates 3:1, 2:1, and 1:1 were prepared using the diagram reported by Davis and Knight [10].

    It should be noted that there is some confusion concerning the 1:1 compound which, according to Davis and Knight, decomposes at temperatures above 988 °C into B2O3 and the 2:1 compound. The powder diffraction pattern in the ASTM file is incorrectly labeled, a point which has been discussed in detail by Block, Burley, Perloff, and Mason [6]. A 1:1 mixture heated at 900 °C forms a product which yields a very complex powder diffraction pattern. It cannot be safely concluded that this pattern is free from the 2:1 borate. However, microscopic examination showed that the 1:1 compound prepared in this manner was a single phase differing from the 2 :1 compound.

  8. Cadmium borates 3:1, 2:1, and 1:2 were prepared. The phase diagram given by Subbarao and Hummel [53] reported 3:2 and 2:3 compounds but no 1:2 compound. The existence of the 3:2 compound was questioned by Hart and Smallwood [18] on the basis of x-ray and infrared data and later by Hand and Krogh-Moe [16]. Results here confirm the absence of the 3:2 compound. Hand and Krogh-Moe [16] have shown that the 2:3 compound is in fact a 1:2 compound.

  9. Zinc borates 5:2, 4:3, and 1:2 were prepared. The original work of Ingerson, Morey, and Tuttle on the ZnO—B2O3 system [22] reported the existence of 5:2 and 1:1 compounds. Harrison and Hummel [17] later confirmed these findings and reported polymorphic forms of both compounds. However, Smith, Garcia-Bianco, and Rivoir [50, 51] showed from single crystal diffraction studies that the 1:1 compound of empirical formula Zn(BO2)2 had the structural formula Zn4O(BO2)6 and was therefore a 4:3 compound. Recently Bauer [2], who appeared to be unaware of the previous reports of Smith et al. [50, 51], concluded that the compounds existing in the system were 3:1 (rather than 5:2), 1:1, and 1:2. Data obtained here by x-ray diffraction and infrared absorption confirm the existence of the 1:2 compound reported by Bauer [2] but are in agreement with the 5:2 ratio rather than the 3:1 value.

  10. Lead borates 2:1, 5:4, 1:1, and 1:2 were prepared. The data of Geller and Bunting [13] did not show a 1:1 lead borate but on the basis of x-ray data here it appears probable that this compound exists.

  11. Rare earth borates having the ratios 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 were prepared. Levin, Roth, and Martin [31] have reported on the 1:1 compounds and the 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 compounds in the La2O3—B2O3 system were described by Levin, Robbins, and Waring [33]. Further work on the system by Levin and McDaniel [35] shows the existence of some compounds having nominal ratios of 3:1 and 1:3 for many of the other rare earths. Although the exact compositions and properties are not established to date, the materials were prepared for study.

  12. Bismuth borates 2:1, 3:5, 1:3, and 1:4 were formed in accordance with the phase diagram of Levin and McDaniel [32].

  13. Cobalt borates 3:1 and 2:1 were prepared using the findings of Konovalov [23].

  14. Miscellaneous borates were prepared as follows:

    1. beryllium borate, presumably of composition 3:1 [56].

    2. indium borate, 1:1 [31].

    3. nickel borate 3:1. This product was formed using NiO. Attempts to prepare the 2:1 nickel borate analogous to the cobalt compound met with no success. The failure to form other compounds might be attributed to the high temperature required to induce reactivity in NiO. The use of NiCO3 might facilitate formation of other borates.

    4. rubidium borate 1:5 [27].

    5. cesium borates 1:3 and 1:9 [26].

    6. two copper borates which appear in the system CuO B2O3. One compound is apparently a 3:1 compound, forming large green crystals. The crystals are highly birefringent, biaxial, negative with 2V ≈ 15°, α= 1.78, β>2.00, γ>2.00. The other compound is probably a 1:1 compound and is azure blue. The properties of these crystals have not been determined with certainty. They may be uniaxial negative or biaxial negative.

    7. TaBO4 reported by Zaslavskii and Zvinchuk [61] was prepared with some difficulty. The samples prepared here were not suitable for use because of impurities. The material actually used was supplied by Mrose [41] who has studied this compound in detail.

    8. The two isostructural compounds BPO4 and BAsO4, were prepared according to the data of Schulze [49]. Attempts to prepare the antimony analog, BSbO4 were not successful.

  15. Several borates previously reported could not be prepared, in particular, ferrous and manganous borates [6]. Oxidation proceeding in the normal preparation techniques was probably responsible for the failure to obtain these borates.

4. Anion Structure and Vibrational Analysis

4.1. Structures

The fact that a number of borates are formed with the same cation is due to the polymeric behavior of the borate ion. Complex anions can arise from polymerization of basic triangular BO3 or tetrahedral BO4 units alone or in combination. The anion structures known to exist have been reported as follows:

The isolated planar anion BO33 is found in LuBO3, InBO3, and ScBO3 which have the calcite structure [31, 52], in LaBO3 with the aragonite structure [31], and in 3MgO·B2O3 [5]. The borates isostructural with 3MgO·B2O3—3CoO·B2O3, 3NiO·B2O3, and 3CdO·B2O3—must also have this anion [42].

The tetrahedral anion BO35 has been reported in TaBO4 [6] and in BPO4 and BAsO4 [49].

The pyroborate ion B2O52 is formed by connecting two triangular BO3 groups at one corner. This ion occurs in 2MgO·B2O3 [54] and in 2CoO·B2O3, 2MnO·B2O3, 2FeO·B2O3, and 2CdO·B2O3 [6, 16] which are isostructural.

An infinite chain of BO3 triangles connected at one corner was shown to be present in CaO·B2O3 by Zachariasen [36, 58, 59] and in α-Li2O·B2O3 [21].

The boroxol ring, a six-membered ring formed by 3BO3 groups, contains alternate boron and oxygen atoms and 3 oxygen atoms out of the ring, each connected to one of the boron atoms. This unit occurs in K2O·B2O3 [60] and Na2O·B2O3 [12, 37]. The rings are interconnected by means of the external oxygen atoms.

Two six-membered rings similar to the boroxol ring are coupled by means of a tetrahedral boron atom common to both rings to form the B5O8 anion. This ion is found in K2O·5B2O3 and Rb2O·5B2O3 [27]. Individual B5O8 units are interconnected by the external oxygen atoms.

A six-membered ring containing 2 triangular and 1 tetrahedral boron is known in Cs2O·3B2O3. This unit is connected to similar units through the off-ring oxygen atoms [29].

The basic structural unit in Li2O·2B2O3 is a B4O72 group consisting of 2BO4 tetrahedra and 2BO3 triangles. The anion is an 8-membered ring in which the opposite tetrahedral BO4 groups provide an oxygen bridge. Similar units are interconnected to form a 3 dimensional network [28].

The structure of BaO·2B2O3 has been reported to consist of a network containing rings similar to those found in Cs2O·3B2O3 and K2O·5B2O3. The two sets of rings are connected by means of the off-ring oxygen atoms and form a 3 dimensional network [7].

Lehmann and Teiss [30] have observed two additional forms of Li2O·B2O3 one of which denoted as the β form has a structure similar to that of cristobalite, the other denoted as the γ form appears to be similar to the cubic form of HBO2.

Finally, the compound 4ZnO·3B2O3 contains only tetrahedral boron atoms. The tetrahedra are coupled at certain corners to form a complex 3 dimensional array [50, 51].

The compounds TaBO4 [61] and BPO4 and BAsO4 [49] also contain only tetrahedral boron atoms. In the latter two compounds the borate tetrahedra share corners with PO4 and AsO4 tetrahedra, respectively, so that each oxygen atom is part of two different tetrahedra. The empirical formulas of these two compounds could be written BO2PO2 and BO2AsO2. TaBO4 is isostructural with zircon [61] and contains discrete BO4 tetrahedra.

4.2. Vibrational Analysis

Both the planar triangle and the tetrahedral unit have been discussed in detail many times and only the results will be indicated here [19]. For an isolated, planar, trigonal BO3 group of D3h symmetry there are four fundamental modes of vibration; ν1—the symmetrical stretch, ν2—the out-of-plane bend, ν3—the antisymmetric stretch, and ν4—the in-plane bend. Both ν3 and ν4 are doubly degenerate and ν1 is ordinarily inactive in the infrared. In a given crystalline environment ν1 may become active and the degeneracies may be removed from ν3 and ν4. The nominal positions expected are ν1—950 cm−1, ν2—750 cm−1, ν3—1250 cm−1, and ν4—600 cm−1 [57] with the exact positions varying somewhat with the crystal field. An isolated tetrahedral anion of symmetry Td should also exhibit 4 fundamentals, a normally inactive symmetric stretch-ν1, an inactive doubly degenerate mode-ν2 which involves bond bending, a strongly active triply degenerate stretching mode-ν3, and another active bending mode-ν4 which is also triply degenerate. In a given crystal ν1 and ν2 may become active and the degeneracies may be removed from ν2, ν3, and ν4. The expected locations of the bands can be inferred from data obtained on similar tetrahedral anions [19]. It is anticipated that ν3 should occur near 1000 cm−1, ν1 below 950 cm−1, ν4 near 600 cm−1 and ν2 below 600 cm−1.

From isotope substitution in the trigonal ion it is expected that ν1 will be unchanged, ν2B10/ν2B111.04 and ν3B10ν4B10/ν3B11ν411B1.04. For the tetrahedral anion ν1 and ν2 will be unchanged and ν3B10ν4B10/ν3B11ν411B1.04. In the more complex anions it is possible that vibrations derived from those for the simple triangular or tetrahedral units might be detected. These vibrations would be shifted in frequency by the covalent bonding of the simple units into the complex anion structure but the isotopic frequency shift should serve to give some indication of the nature of the vibrations. As will be shown later, this type of identification which has been referred to as group frequency analysis in connection with spectra of organic materials, may have some justification.

In the pyroborate ion all B—O bonds are not equivalent, as shown by Block et al. [6] in 2MgO·B2O3, and there is no symmetry. The ion is therefore in point group C1, all vibrations are of species A and all are infrared active. There are 15 normal modes of vibration and some idea of the nature of these modes may be obtained as follows:

Twelve normal modes would be expected from internal vibrations of the two coupled triangular units. There should be two each derived from the ν1 and ν2 type vibrations and 4 each from the ν3 and ν4 types. The extra 3 modes will be derived from the motions of one trigonal unit with respect to the other and arise essentially from the loss of the 3 translational modes of one unit. These latter three modes are expected to be of rather low frequency because of the large masses involved and might lie oustide the range of the present studies. The two modes derived from ν1 and ν2 can be visualized as in phase and out of phase motions in the coupled triangular units. Those derived from the originally degenerate ν3 and ν4 vibrations are somewhat difficult to visualize. However, the effect of isotopic substitution is expected to parallel the behavior of the isolated trigonal ion. Thus modes derived from ν1 and ν4 will be relatively unaffected, while those derived from ν2 and ν3 will be affected markedly. The three low frequency twisting or rocking modes should also be insensitive to isotopic substitution because of the relatively large masses involved.

The boroxol ring has been studied extensively by Goubeau and his coworkers [14, 15] who have proposed frequency assignments. The B3O6 ring is of point group symmetry D3h and of the 21 total normal modes only a few are expected to be normally active in the isolated ring. The active modes are 2 of species A2 and 5 of species E′. In metaboric acid Goubeau and Hummel have assigned these bands as follows: species A2; ν6—591 cm−1 ν7—476 cm−1; and species E′; ν8—1375 cm−1, ν9—1150 cm−1, ν10—735 cm−1, ν11—456 cm−1, ν12—280 cm−1. From these assignments it appears that not more than 6 fundamentals should be observed for this unit in these experiments, with, ν12 below the range studied here.

The other known metaborate structure consists of infinite chains of trigonal borate groups connected through two oxygen atoms. There is no symmetry and all vibrations will be infrared active in species A. The unit cell contains two chains, each of empirical formula (BO2)4. The spectrum, therefore, should resemble that of the pyroborate group, as the structural units consist of two coupled pyroborate groups. More bands can be expected because of the larger number of normal modes but the frequencies and isotope dependence should resemble similar data on the pyroborates.

The complex ring systems reported in K2O·5B2O3, Cs2O·3B2O3, Li2O·2B2O3, and BaO·2B2O3 have no symmetry elements. Therefore, all modes are active and a very complex spectrum is to be expected. No detailed interpretation of these spectra are to be expected unless group frequency analysis should prove useful.

The zinc metaborate structure is very complex and complete analysis is not anticipated. From the x-ray structure analysis [50, 51], in a given tetrahedron one oxygen is connected to a zinc atom while the other 3 atoms are shared by 3 different tetrahedra. Although the structural analysis indicates all B—O bonds to be similar, this appears to be most unlikely and it seems more reasonable to consider the oxygen coupled to the zinc to be unique. Under these circumstances it is useful to consider the symmetry of the tetrahedral unit to approximate C3v rather than Td. In this approximation the basic unit can be visualized as containing a central atom bonded to two different kinds of atoms, one the oxygen bound to zinc, and the other, the three oxygens connected into the network. The latter three atoms can be visualized as having large effective masses conferred by the coupling into the other tetrahedra. On the basis of these assumptions the spectrum would be expected to bear some resemblance to that of an XYZ3 type molecule with allowances for network perturbation effects. As will be shown later this viewpoint permits a reasonable interpretation of the observed data.

5. Presentation of Data

The following system is adopted for presenting the data:

Observed absorption bands are tabulated for each material studied with the following abbreviations used to denote the character of the bands; s—strong, m—medium, w—weak, b—broad, sh—shoulder, v—very. It is understood that the bands may vary in character with the method of obtaining the spectrum, concentration, etc., so that the descriptions apply only to the bands observed here. The existence of the bands listed is considered to be well established because all spectra were obtained at least in duplicate by two different methods. Doubtful bands are indicated with a question mark.

Representative spectra are given for some but not all materials studied with frequencies in wave numbers indicated for the various bands. Two or more spectra are given in each figure with the spectra displaced vertically to eliminate overlapping. The transmittance axis, therefore, cannot be subdivided quantitatively but all spectra are referred to the same intensity scale and are directly comparable. Spectra shown are in most instances composite tracings of mull spectra below 1000 cm−1 and film spectra above 1000 cm−1. In some instances film spectra are shown throughout the range used.

Borates are classified with respect to type of anion with all borates of a given type discussed together. Such a separation is desirable because spectra of compounds containing similar anions are expected to be comparable. Although the major separation is in terms of the empirical formula of the anion, subdivision in terms of actual structure is made where the structure is known.

6. Results and Discussion

6.1. Orthoborates

Orthoborates, Xm(BO3)n, are formed by the 3:1 divalent metal borates and the 1:1 trivalent metal borates. From the point of view of infrared spectroscopy these compounds may be interpreted, in many instances, in terms of the simple planar trigonal BO33 ion.

a. Divalent Metal Orthoborates

The spectra of all of the divalent metal orthoborates with the exception of 3BeO·B2O3 can be interpreted in terms of the six fundamentals of the perturbed BO33 ion. Typical spectra are shown in figures 1 and 2 and the observed bands and assignments are tabulated for the normal iostopic distribution in table 1. The assignments for the bands are supported by the isotopic shifts given in table 2 for some of the compounds. In figure 1 a definite split in the ν3 band is noted for the B11 and B10 compounds. The split is not observed in the normal strontium borate although structure in the ν3 band is apparent. All isotopically “pure” compounds showed such a split which produced two highly unsymmetrical bands. The unsymmetrical nature of the bands caused some concern that the apparent splitting might be an artifact caused by variation of index of refraction of the specimen with frequency. Several different experiments were performed using different dispersing media without changing the position or shape of the splitting peak. The split of ν3 is concluded to be real. Several weak bands in the 750 cm−1 — 1000 cm−1 region are of uncertain origin. Several of these bands observed in the normal strontium borate are eliminated in the B10 and B11 compounds so that they may arise from coupling of vibrations between trigonal ions containing different boron isotopes. Such effects have been discussed by Decius [11]. In addition it is not clear from the spectrum or the experiments on isotope substitution which band corresponds to ν1. From comparisons with the carbonates and nitrates and from other data to be given later it is concluded that the weak band near 1000 cm−1 in these spectra corresponds to ν1. The bands near 900 cm−1 are taken to represent combinations of lower frequency modes with ν4 or ν2 or overtones of a lower frequency mode. The alternate hypothesis that two dissimilar BO33 groups are present in the unit cell and give rise to two different symmetric stretching modes is untenable in these compounds. The structure of 3MgO·B2O3 and 3CoO·B2O3 by Burger [35] shows that all BO33 groups are equivalent. However, the B—O bonds are not identical and there is no trigonal symmetry. All modes should be active and nondegenerate as shown by the spectra of the isostructural magnesium, cobalt, nickel, and cadmium compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Absorption spectra of strontium orthoborates.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Absorption spectra for different crystal structures in the orthoborates.

Table 1.

Infrared absorption spectra of divalent metal orthoborates (cm−1)

Radius of cation, Å 3MgOB2O30.67 3NiOB2O3 0.69 3CoOB2O3 0.73 3CdOB2O3 0.97 3CaOB2O3 0.99 3SrOB2O3 1.12 3BaOB2O31 1.34 3BeOB2O3
ν3 1090-1290 1080-1260 1020-1250 1100-1290 1140-1310 1090-1260 1140-1260 1240-1340
ν1 1022w -------------- -------------- 1006vw -------------- -------------- -------------- 928m
- 907w 893w 893w 887w 902w 881w 908w 861s
- 836vw -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 837w
- 808w -------------- -------------- -------------- 794w 783w 808w 818wsh
806m
781m
767s
773w 773w 767w -------------- 773vw -------------- 740m
754vw 752w 747w -------------- 727m
719 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 708m
709 700 710 727sh -------------- -------------- 700s
ν2 719sb 691vs 676vs 692vs 702vs 715vs -------------- 672s
667msh
657m
649m
ν4 657m2 619s2 617s2 611m2 622m 612m -------------- 643m
619w
v′ 606w 598m 587m 575w 613m2 600s2 -------------- 600wb
548wb
420w
500sb 400sb 400sb 350sb 420sb 350sb -------------- 400w
1

All specimens of 3BaOB2O3 were contaminated with BaCO3. The known absorption bands for BaCO3 are not tabulated here.

2

The stronger of the two bands is denoted by the superscript.

Table 2.

Infrared absorption spectra of isotopically enriched divalent metal orthoborates (cm−1)

Assignment 3MgOB2O3
3CaOB2O3
3SrOB2O3
3BaOB2O3
3CdOB2O3
B10 B11 B10 B11 B10 B11 B10 B11 B10 B11
ν3 1332 1264 1303 1261 1265 1223 1262 1222 1250 1210
ν3′ 1290 1224 1266 1227 1235 1192 1223 1185 1190 1160
ν1 1025 1021 1014 1013 1003 1002 -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
882? 883? -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
ν2 733 720 730 708 729 706 778 749 726 702
792 761 -------------- --------------
ν4 659 655 624 619 612 610 602 599 608 606
ν4′ 608 604 617 612 601 598 568 567 574 572

In table 1 the data for 3BaO·B2O3 are incomplete. BaCO3 contamination produced such strong interferences that the borate bands could not be located with certainty. The known carbonate bands [57] are not listed in table 1. The table lists only limits of the broad, strong ν3 band. From figure 1 it is clear that the breadth of this band arises in part from overlapping of bands arising from the two boron isotopes. An additional source of strength is probably due to resonance with overtones of ν4 which fall in this region.

The compounds 3MgO·B2O3, 3NiO·B2O3, 3CoO·B2O3, and 3CdO·B2O3 are isostructural with orthorhomic cells having the parameters shown in table 3 [42]. From tables 3 and 1 it will be noted that as the unit cell dimensions decrease, the absorption frequencies generally shift to higher frequencies. This behavior parallels that found previously in isostructural carbonates and nitrates where it was attributed to the effect of anion repulsion in the closer packed structures [57]. For these compounds the behavior of the two components of ν4 is of interest. It will be noted from table 1 that the higher frequency component of ν4 is stronger in contrast to 3SrO·B2O and 3CaO·B2O (figs 1 and 2) in which the lower frequency component of is stronger. The amount of splitting between the components of ν4 appears to be least in the nickel compound and increases as the unit cell gets larger.

Table 3.

Unit cell parameters of isostructural orthorhombic orthoborates

a b c
10−8cm 10−8cm 10−8cm
3MgOB2O3 5.398 8.416 4.497
3NiOB2O3 5.398 8.305 4.462
3CoOB2O3 5.642 8.436 4.526
3CdOB2O3 5.967 9.010 4.785

In view of the reversal of intensities in the strontium, calcium, and barium orthoborates it is to be expected that the two groups of compounds are not isostructural. X-ray diffraction shows this to be true and indicates that 3SrO·B2O3, 3CaO·B2O3, and 3BaO·B2O3 might also form an isostructural group. However, even though the details of the structure are unknown, it can be concluded from the infrared spectra that all these compounds contain isolated planar BO33 ions. In order for the splitting of ν3 and ν4 to occur, the ions must either be nontrigonal or be located in a crystal field of low symmetry.

The assignments given here differ considerably from those of Hart and Smallwood [18] who considered the weak sharp bands near 900 cm−1 to correspond to ν2 and the strong band near 700 cm−1 to be ν4. In view of the effects of isotopic substitution observed here, these assignments cannot be correct. The error appears to be due to the fact that ν4 is located outside the spectral range available to Hart and Smallwood [18]. In view of these discrepancies the force constants were recalculated assuming valence forces [19] and the results are tabulated in table 4. The constants shown were calculated using the data of table 2 for compounds containing the B11 isotope. The splitting of ν3 and ν4 requires at least 2 values for the planar bending constant, Kδ/l2, and in this calculation the higher frequency values of ν3 and ν4 were considered to represent a corresponding set and the lower frequency values the second set. The value of ν1 for 3CdO·B2O3 was taken from table 1 and the value for 3BaO·B2O3 which was not observed was assumed to be equal to the value observed in 3SrO·B2O3. As this assumption may be incorrect, data depending on the value are enclosed in parentheses in table 4. The values for the force constants differ from these given by Hart and Smallwood [18] and are in reasonable good agreement with previous calculations based on the calcite and aragonite forms of the rare earth borates [57].

Table 4.

Force constants of orthoborate ions assuming valence forces

K1 KΔ/l2 /l2
105 dyne/cm 105 dyne/cm 105 dyne/cm
3MgOB2O3 9.82 0.92 0.39
0.31
3CaOB2O3 9.67 0.89 0.35
0.32
3SrOB2O3 9.42 0.91 0.33
0.30
3BaOB2O3 (9.4) 1.0 (0.31)
(0.26)
3CdOB2O3 9.54 0.87 0.31
0.26

The spectrum of 3BeO·B2O3 appears to be different from the spectra of the other divalent orthoborates, showing a large number of bands in the 600 cm−1 to 850 cm−1 range. The differences, however, may be more apparent than real because the spectrum is probably complicated by bands arising from Be-O vibrational modes. BeO itself exhibits broad absorption bands near 960 cm−1, 880 cm−1, and 750 cm−1 and the bands in beryllium borate appear to be superimposed on these bands which may arise from excess BeO or from Be-O vibrational modes in the borate itself.

b. Trivalent Metal Orthoborates

This series of orthoborates is of particular interest because of the formation of calcite-, aragonite-, and vaterite-type structures in the borates [31]. Earlier infrared studies demonstrated the similarity of the absorption spectra of the calcite and aragonite type structures [57] but showed no correlation in the spectra of the carbonate and borate vaterites. Later Levin, Roth, and Martin [31] found that the borate-type vaterites all exhibit a transition at elevated temperatures forming a nonquenchable high-temperature phase whose x-ray powder diffraction pattern is more nearly like that of the carbonate vaterite than the diffraction pattern of the room temperature phase. Although it is not possible, at present, to obtain the absorption spectrum of the high temperature phase, it seems probable that it will resemble the spectrum of the carbonate vaterite which can be interpreted on the basis of trigonal CO32 ions. The previous data on the borate vaterites could not be interpreted readily in this manner and the problem was unresolved. Isotopic substitution data and comparison with the spectra of other borates permits some conclusions to be drawn at this time.

Considering first the results for calcite and aragonite-type structures, absorption data are compiled in table 5 for Sc2O3·B2O3 and In2O3·B2O3 which form calcite-type structures and for La2O3·B2O3 which forms the aragonite type structure. The spectra of scandium and indium borates show the spectra associated with the calcite-type structure with ν1 inactive and ν4 degenerate and unsplit. Isotopic shifts found with the indium borate confirm the assignments. In the spectra shown in figure 2 the 765 cm−1 band observed in In2O3·B2O3 with a normal isotope distribution can be identified with the ν2 band of the B10 compound by means of the data of table 5. The three bands below 600 cm−1 listed in table 5 did not appear in all preparations and were found to be present in In2O3. They presumably arise from excess In2O3.

Table 5.

Infrared absorption spectra of calcite and aragonite type borates (cm−1)

SC2O3B2O3 (calcite) In2O3B2O3 (calcite)
La2O3B2O3 (aragonite)
B10 B11 B10 B11
1350sbsh 1310sbsh
ν3 1198svb 1230svb 1202svb 1289svb 1244svb
ν1 -------------- -------------- -------------- 938m 938m
ν2 722sb 765sb 740sb 733sb 708sb
-------------- -------------- -------------- 717msh 669wsh
ν4 636m 672s 670s 610m 606m
591m 587m
596m 596m561m533mIn2O3
560m
533m

The assignments and isotopic shifts in La2O·B2O3 confirm the behavior expected for the aragonite type structure. The symmetric stretch, ν1, is active and unaffected by the boron isotope, ν4, is split and affected slightly by the boron mass, and ν3 is apparently split and strongly dependent on boron mass. Strong bands at 1350 cm−1 and 1310 cm−1 were taken to represent the high frequency components of ν3 for the B10 and B11 compounds. Alternate assignments as combinations of ν2 and ν4 will not satisfy the isotopic dependence observed. In La2O3·B2O3 with the normal isotopic distribution a band is observed near 790 cm−1 (see fig. 2). This band is not found in the isotopically pure compounds and probably arises from coupling effects as noted by Decius [11]. This band was previously found in both neodymium and lanthanum borate and considered to be part of ν2. The absence of the band in the isotopically “pure” compounds shows this is not correct. The results obtained here agree well with previous data reported by Steele and Decius [52].

In figure 2 the infrared spectra of the four different crystal structures are compared. The close similarities in the spectra are evident. It will be noted that the behavior of ν4 in the different structures serves as a distinguishing feature. This band is split in 3CdO·B2O3 with the higher frequency the stronger, it is split in 3CaO·B2O3 with the separation small and the lower frequency the stronger, it is split in La2O3·B2O3 with both components of about equal intensity but separated about 30 cm−1, and it is unsplit in In2O3·B2O3. In the first three compounds the position of ν4 is about the same but in the In2O3·B2O3 it has shifted to much higher frequency, an indication of much tighter packing.

Absorption spectra of the rare earth borates having the vaterite type structure were studied only for the holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutecium compounds. Spectra for the holmium, thulium, and ytterbium borates were obtained with the normal isotopic distribution, for lutecium borate in the isotopically enriched compounds only, and for erbium borate in both the normal and enriched forms. Typical spectra are shown in figure 3 for the normal isotopic distribution and in figure 4 for the isotopically “pure” borates of erbium and lutecium. The observed bands are tabulated in table 6.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Absorption spectra of rare earth vaterite-type borates.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Isotope effects in rare earth vaterite-type borates

Table 6.

Infrared absorption spectra of vaterite type rare earth borates (cm−1)

Ho2O3B2O3 Er2O3B2O3
Tm2O3B2O3 Yb2O3B2O3 Lu2O3B2O3
B10+B11 B10 B11 B10 B11
1282mvb 1320–1265wb
1099sb 1062sb -------------- -------------- 1150?mb 1098svb
1045sbsh 1051bsh 1064m 1020m 1057bsh 1063bsh 1082mb 1042mb
1020sbsh 1023sbsh -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1002svb 1003svb 1013m 985m 1013svb 1022svb 1012mb 986mb
917sb 921vsb 930sb 915sb 925vsb 927sb 934sb 920sb
853vsb 857vsb 863sb 836sb 862vsb 866vsb 870vsb 850vsb
822bsh -------------- 845s 823s 834bsh -------------- 847vsb 828vsb
730vw? -------------- -------------- 780msh --------------
707m 707m 712m 707m 713m 718m 721m 718m
625bsh 642bsh -------------- -------------- 620mb 580msh
563mb 559mb 562mb 557mb 567mb 568mb 572mb 569mb
464bsh 463wsh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
424wsh 424wsh -------------- -------------- 418wsh 428wsh -------------- --------------
395s 390s 396s 393s 398s 398s 396s 397s
375sb
348sb 350sb 362sb 362sb 355w 357w 365sb --------------
332msh 330msh 342w 340wb -------------- 340mb

In figure 3 it will be noted that the four strong bands between 800cm−1 and 1100 cm−1 confirm the previous observations where only three of these bands could be detected with assurance in all the borates [57]. When isotope substitution is employed it is clear that at least six bands can be resolved in this region. In figure 4 it will be noted that almost without exception each band shifts to higher frequency as the cation mass increases from 167 in Er to 175 in Lu. The same tendency is apparent in figure 3 where the bands are not as well resolved. This shift has been attributed to increased anion repulsion produced by contraction of the unit cell dimensions. The bands between 800 cm−1 and 1100 cm−1 show marked shifts with change in mass of the boron. It is most likely that these bands are fundamentals for the following reasons: first, they are all quite strong, second, the dependence on mass is much greater than to be expected for overtones of low frequency modes, and third, there do not appear to be any reasonably constant differences between these bands. It may be concluded therefore that most of the six strong bands are fundamentals and correspond to a stretching type vibration. The weak bands in the 1300 cm−1 region may be combination modes or arise from contamination with the 3:1 borates whose spectra will be described later.

To interpret these spectra it is necessary to apply certain results which will be demonstrated later. First, every borate which is known to contain trigonal borate groups alone or in complex polymeric anions invariably exhibits strong absorption in the region of 1200 cm−1 or higher. The isotopic mass dependence of these bands shows that they may be considered to be derived from or due to the antisymmetric stretch of planar BO3 groups. Second, there is always at least one band attributable to the out-of-plane bending mode of the trigonal group occurring in the 650 cm−1 to 750 cm−1 region which can be identified by its strong isotopic shift. The bands in the 700 cm−1 region for Lu2O3·B2O3 and Er2O3·B2O3 do not exhibit an isotopic shift sufficiently large for the trigonal ν2 band. Third the spectrum of zinc borate which is known to contain only tetrahedrally coordinated boron shows strong broad fundamentals in the 900 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 region and a band near 717 cm−1 with a small isotopic shift. From these considerations it is necessary to conclude that the spectra of the rare earth borates of the vaterite type are consistent with the presence of only four-fold coordinated boron in the structure. The longer B—O bonds in the tetrahedra would account for the shift of the strong stretching bands to frequencies below 1100 cm−1. Furthermore, the number of fundamentals observed and their isotopic dependence cannot be reconciled with the behavior to be expected from isolated tetrahedra. These facts lead to the conclusion that the anion in these borates is a complex polymeric structure containing only BO4 tetrahedra. It is suggested that a six-membered ring containing alternate B—O bonds with each boron connected to 2 off-ring oxygen atoms is not inconsistent with the empirical formula or the spectrum.

6.2. Metaborates

a. Alkali Metaborates

Of the alkali metaborates only the lithium, sodium, and potassium compounds were studied. The spectra of Na2O·B2O3 and K2O·B2O3 are very poor and are characterized by few resolvable bands. Typical spectra are shown in figure 5 and the data are given in table 7. As shown in figure 5 few bands can be resolved in the 1000 cm−1 to 1400 cm−1 either because of overlapping bands or because of strong scattering. The distortion region below 800 cm−1, however, shows several characteristic bands. From comparisons with previously reported spectra on NaBO2 [8, 14, 25] it is clear that the present spectrum agrees reasonably well in the distortion region. The strong bands above 1200 cm−1 are not distinguishable in the present spectra, however, Using the terminology and assignments of Goubeau and Hummel [14] the 723 cm−1 and 701 cm−1 bands correspond to two components of ν10 in NaBO2 and the corresponding bands in KBO2 would be at 730 cm−1 and 721 cm−1. The 469 cm−1 band observed in KBO2 but not in NaBO2 probably corresponds to ν11 while the 952 cm−1 band in NaBO2 and the corresponding 940 cm−1 band in KBO2 represent the 1st overtone of ν11. The small discrepancy noted between calculated and observed values for the overtone is not considered significant in view of the breadth of the bands. The bands at 372 cm−1 in NaBO2 and 379 cm−1 in KBO2 are obviously similar but their assignments are not apparent from the data of Goubeau and Hummel [14] except possibly as combinations or overtones of lower frequency modes. Positions of higher frequency bands listed for NaBO2 are so inexact that they have little significance.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Absorption spectra of alkali metaborates.

Table 7.

Infrared absorption spectra of alkali metaborates (cm−1)

NaBO2 KBO2
LiBO2
B10 & B11 B10 B11 B10 &B11 B10 B11
1323s vb?--- -------------- -------------- -------------- 1400svb 1482sb 1435s
1385sb 1345sb
1157vsb 1358sb 1316sb
1298wsh 1160sb
1025svb? -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 1166sb 1123sb
1006? -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 1073wb 1072wb
948w 940vb? 942m 942m 973m 986sb 967sb
775sbs -------------- -------------- 882mb 915sb 895s
741wsh 730ssh 730sb 712sb 810vw 865wsh 877s
775wsh 778wb 777wb
723s 720s -------------- -------------- 722sb 722mb 715sb
685mbsh 715mb 677wsh
701ssh -------------- -------------- -------------- 626mb -------------- 620mb
469w 473w 470w 522sb 545mb 538mb
372m 379m 382s 381s 420mb 510mb 510mb
406msh 420mb 420mb
410mb 410mb

As can be seen from table 7 the spectrum of LiBO2 is completely different from those of the other alkali borates. In the 1000 cm−1 to 1400 cm−1 region there is overlapping and loss of resolution in the compound with the normal isotopic distribution but in the isotopically enriched specimens the resolution improves and the region is found to contain many bands. From the x-ray powder diffraction pattern, it appears that the LiBO2 studied here is the α-form and contains anions consisting of chains of BO3 groups sharing corners [21]. The spectrum should resemble that for Ca(BO2)2 to be discussed later. There are, in fact, many similarities in the spectra of these two compounds, but there are many more absorption bands present in LiBO2 particularly at the lower frequencies. Because of the small mass of the lithium ion it is expected that vibrational modes arising from motion of the cation might be observed in this spectral region. Such vibrations and their combinations and overtones would be expected to produce a more complex absorption spectrum in LiBO2 than in Ca(BO2)2. It is also of interest to note that strong bands extend to as high as 1400 cm−1 in LiBO2. These bands appear to be fundamentals because of their strengths and the fact that their isotopic dependence is inconsistent with overtones and combinations of lower frequency bands. The presence of fundamentals in this range supports the supposition that some of the B—O bonds are much stronger than those found in the BO3 trigonal ion.

b. Alkaline Earth Metaborates

Typical spectra for the alkaline earth metaborates are shown in figures 6 and 7 and the data for normal isotope distributions are given in table 8 and for isotopically enriched compounds in table 9. The structure of the anion of CaO·B2O3 is known to consist of endless chains of triangles [36, 58, 59] which may be considered as coupled pyroborate groups. Consequently, the spectrum should resemble that of a pyroborate and the relationship of the bands observed to the fundamentals of a trigonal group should be clear in many instances. Comparing the data of CaO·B2O3 with that of 2CaO·B2O3 (table 12) it is apparent that the spectra show a close relationship. As in the pyroborate, the group of bands between 1100 cm−1 and 1450 cm−1 are strong, broad, and very strongly dependent on isotopic mass. These bands are therefore derived from ν3 of the trigonal group. The 1012 cm−1 corresopnds to the symmetric stretch derived from ν1 because it is isotope independent, and the bands below 800 cm−1 are derived from the distortion modes ν2 and ν4. The close similarity between the spectra of CaO·B2O3 and SrO·B2O3 is apparent in figure 6. This similarity led to the prediction that these compounds were probably isostructural. The prediction was verified by x-ray powder diffraction and it may be concluded that the strontium metaborate also contains anions consisting of chains of BO3 groups. The spectra of CaO·B2O3 and SrO·B2O3 are very simple in view of the large number of active normal modes. Apart from the fact that some bands appear to overlap it seems that many bands must either be very weak or coincide in frequency with other bands to produce a spectrum of such apparent simplicity. Marezio, Plettinger, and Zachariasen [36] recently refined the structure of CaO·B2O3 and showed that the unique oxygen atom attached to each boron atom in the chain is more tightly bonded than the oxygen atoms of the normal trigonal BO3 group. This tighter bond can be used to account for the existence of fundamentals of much higher frequency than are normally found in isolated trigonal groups.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Absorption spectra of alkaline earth metaborates.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Absorption spectra of two forms of barium metaborate.

Table 8.

Infrared absorption spectra of alkaline earth metaborates with normal isotope content (cm−1)

Mg(BO2)2 Ca(BO2)2 Sr(BO2)2 Ba(BO2)2
High temp form Low temp form
1480b 1435vs 1424s 1527m --------------
1375vbs 1365m 1320vb 1383sb 1383sb
1292sb 1326m 1228svb 1257s --------------
1205msh 1248mb -------------- -------------- --------------
1180s -------------- -------------- 1233sb 1230sb
1168s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1130mb 1160svb 1164s -------------- 1193b
1063msh -------------- 1102sb -------------- --------------
1020s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
978s 1012vw 1002svb -------------- 962m
966s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
936s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
915m -------------- -------------- 956s 950m
883s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
835s -------------- -------------- -------------- 842wb
817m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
797w -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
774m 773m 767m 765wb 765wb
728w -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
718m 736mb 727mb 724s --------------
702s 704sb -------------- 711ssh 718ssh
676s -------------- -------------- -------------- 701s
664wsh 668wsh 683sb -------------- --------------
653wsh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
627m 628sb 627sb -------------- --------------
600m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
567m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
547w -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
524wsh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
508wsh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
498m 475wb -------------- 477w --------------
458mb -------------- -------------- -------------- 423wsh
430m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
402m -------------- -------------- 402s --------------
375m -------------- -------------- -------------- 380mb
355m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Table 9.

Infrared absorption spectra of isotopically enriched alkaline earth metaborates (cm−1)

Ca(BO2)2
Ba(BO2)2
B10 B11 Low temp form
High temp form
B10 B11 B10 B11
1461
1483sb 1435s 1290 1245 1422 1367
1411sb 1365m 1271 -------------- 1401 --------------
1210 1215 1287 1257
1374sb 1326m 1227 1188 1275 1230
1301sb 1248sb -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
966 962 -------------- --------------
1163vsb 1168sb? 953 950 957 953m
1012vw 1012w 798 -------------- 766w 766vw
786 -------------- -------------- --------------
781wsh 766m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
723 700 738s 716s
750m 736m 712 688 -------------- --------------
712sb 700s 603vw 604vw -------------- --------------
480m 476m
675wsh 672sh 388m 388m 400s 400s
378m 378m -------------- --------------
635sb 627s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Table 12.

Infrared absorption spectra of divalent pyroborates (cm−1)

2MgOB2O3 2CaO·B2O3
2SrOB2O3 2CdOB2O3 2CoOB2O3 2PbOB2O3
B10&B11 B10 B11
1450vsvb -------------- 1450msh 1450msh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1366 1411vs 1365vs 1350sb 1350svb 1400svb 1352w
1328 1374s 1327s 1323sb -------------- -------------- 1315sh
1290m 1292 1335s 1290s 1261sb -------------- -------------- 1284s
1260m 1248 1302vs 1255vs 1220sb 1250sb 1250svb 1248s
1208ssh 1177ssh -------------- -------------- -------------- 1233s
1150svb 1140svb 1172 1158svb 1161sb 1130svb 1150svb --------------
1127sbsh 1092sb -------------- -------------- --------------
1022m 1011m 1012m 1012m 1000m 998m 1007 1017sb
975bsh 973vw -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 971s
877vs
834wb -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 835
806w 813m 803m 789w 800 817 --------------
789wb 775vw -------------- -------------- 772w -------------- -------------- --------------
744m
745msh -------------- -------------- -------------- 735msh -------------- -------------- 731m
726msh 707 -------------- --------------
712s 718s 738s 723s 717s 691s 698s 710
735s -------------- -------------- -------------- 693 703
683s -------------- 728sh -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
685bsh
668msh 667m 671s 670s 656m 667s 658 661
640
603s 618s 618s 618s 616s 591s 587 615
595
568w -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 572 578
535wsh -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 547m
484s 475w 475 474w 460w 497w 449 --------------

The spectrum of MgO·B2O3 as shown in figure 6 is quite complex and not analogous to the calcium and strontium compounds. As noted earlier, it is believed that the spectrum is representative of the compound and is not complicated by the presence of other magnesium borates. It appears plausible that because of the tighter packing produced by the small Mg+2 ion, the chains present in CaO·B2O3 and SrO·B2O3 might be in such close proximity that cross linking by means of the unique atoms might occur. Cross linking would produce some tetrahedral boron atoms and give rise to strong absorption in the 800 cm−1 to 1000 cm−1 region as shown in figure 6. Some indirect support for this hypothesis may be drawn from the fact that a strongly cross-linked material might be expected to decompose at elevated temperatures, a behavior exhibited by MgO·B2O3 which decomposes into B2O3 and the 2:1 compound. However, some strongly bonded oxygen atoms must be present in the structure as shown by strong absorption bands as high as 1480 cm−1.

Barium metaborate undergoes a transition forming a quenchable high temperature phase and both forms were studied. From the spectra shown in figure 7 it may be concluded that the anion has high symmetry and is unlike the chain anions of SrO·B2O3 and CaO·B2O3. Both the low and high temperature forms give similar spectra with some evidence of lowering of the symmetry in the low temperature form as shown by the splitting of the 956 cm−1 band into two components at 962 cm−1 and 950 cm−1. The isotopic substitution data of table 9 strengthen the indication that bands in the high temperature form split into two components in the low temperature form. Although the structure of the anion is not known in this compound it may be suggested on the basis of the spectrum alone that B3O6 rings of the boroxol type may constitute the anion in the high temperature form and that the rings are coupled in some manner in the low temperature form. Single crystal x-ray work, now under way, is expected to confirm or refute the correctness of this suggestion in the near future. The x-ray powder diffraction pattern of the high temperature form indexes readily in the hexagonal system with the lattice parameters, a = 7.23×10−8 cm, c=39.17×10−8cm [7].

c. Zinc Metaborate

Zinc metaborate, the 4:3 compound, has the structural formula Zn4O(BO2)6 and represents one of the few anhydrous borates known to contain only tetrahedrally coordinated boron which have been studied in this investigation. Typical spectra for the compound are shown in figure 8 and the corresponding absorption frequencies are tabulated in table 10. The spectra appear to agree well with spectra given by Krogh-Moe [24]. From the structural analysis [50, 51] the B—O bond distance is known to be 1.48 Å and the maximum frequencies observed should be lower than those of any trigonal borate group which has B—O bonds of the order of 1.35 Å. From these considerations it appears likely that the 1082 cm−1 band is the highest fundamental and that the weaker bands observed at 1160 cm−1 and 1200 cm−1 are overtones or combinations. As noted earlier (see 4.2) the spectrum may be assigned completely in this frequency range by considering the bonded tetrahedra to be effective XYZ3-type molecules. The assignments given in table 10 were made on this basis using the terminology of Hertzberg [19]. Although the specific assignments are subject to some uncertainty, they show that the three highest frequency bands, i.e., weak broad bands above 1100 cm−1 can be interpreted as combinations of the observed fundamentals and an unobserved ν6 located near 230 cm−1. The internal consistency of the assignments is indicated by the fact that application of the Teller-Redlich product rule [19] to the isotopically enriched specimens gives results in good agreement with the observed frequencies. It is required that ν1ν2ν3/ν1ν2ν3=1110ν4ν5ν6/ν4ν5ν6 where the unprimed frequencies refer to the B10 compound and the primed frequencies to the B11 compound. The values of the ratios agree within the experimental error of the measurements with the assumption that the ratio ν6/ν6′ is unity. It may be noted that both the 470 cm−1 and 922 cm−1 bands of the B11 compound might arise from overtones and/or combinations in view of the derived 230 cm−1 frequency. The strength of the bands, however, makes this interpretation unlikely. Some of the internal structure observed in the 922 cm−1 band may arise from resonance effects between the fundamental and a combination of ν4 and ν6 which would be located near the same frequency.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Absorption spectra of zinc metaborate (Zn4O(BO6)6)

Table 10.

Infrared absorption spectra of zinc metaborate [Zn4O(cm−1) (BO2)6]

4ZnO·3B2O3
Assignment1
B10 & B11 B10 B11
1340vwb 1296vwb ν5 + ν6
1200wsh 1275wb 1232wb ν1 + ν6
1160wsh 1160wsh 1142wsh ν2 + ν6
1082svb 1105sb 1071sb ν5(E)
1037m 1067m 1030m ν1(A1)
927vb 937svb 922svb ν2(A1)
717s 721s 716s ν4(E)
470s 470s 470s ν3(A1)
(230) ν6(E)
1

Assignments on basis of effective C3v symmetry for BO4 groups.

Regardless of the details of the assignment there is evidence for concluding that no fundamentals occur above 1100 cm−1 in the B11 compound, a conclusion which is in accord with the weak B—O bond obtained from the x-ray structure analysis. From this result and additional spectra to be discussed later, it is concluded that when tetrahedrally coordinated boron is present strong fundamentals derived from ν3 of the tetrahedral ion should occur in the 800 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 region. In these studies compounds containing three-fold coordinated boron always show strong fundamentals above 1100 cm−1 which can be considered as derived from the ν3 of the trigonal ion. For purposes of determining coordination the region between 800 cm−1 and 1400 cm−1 is considered to be important. It may also be noted that the zinc metaborate shows a band in the 700 cm−1 region. This band might be misinterpreted as corresponding to the out-of-plane mode, ν2 of a trigonal BO3 group which falls in the same frequency region. However, isotopic substitution distinguishes these bands because the shift observed in the zinc metaborate is much smaller than the corresponding shift in the trigonal ions.

The rare earth vaterite-type borates (sec. 6.1.b) have spectra showing similarities with the spectrum of zinc metaborate both with respect to band position and with respect to isotope shift. The corresponding bands are 1042 cm−1, 920 cm−1, and 718 cm−1 in Lu2O3·B211O3 and 1071 cm−1, 922 cm−1 and 716 cm−1 in Zn4O(B11O2)6. These similarities were considered in the previous conclusions concerning the presence of tetrahedrally coordinated boron in the vaterite structures.

d. Rare Earth Metaborates

The first few members of the rare earth series form borates having a nominal ratio of metal oxide to boric oxide of 1:3. The composition is known for lanthanum borate [33] but it is less certain for the other borates and the system is presently being studied by Levin and McDaniel [35]. Although the composition is uncertain all the borates will be considered to have the 1:3 ratio at this time. Assuming a 1:3 ratio, the empirical formula can be written M(BO2)3 and the compounds can be considered to be metaborates.

Typical absorption spectra are shown in figure 9 and the observed absorption bands are compiled in table 11. From figure 9 it will be observed that there are large numbers of bands throughout the frequency range extending as high as 1450 cm−1. Further it can be observed that there is a very marked correspondence between the spectra, so that it is reasonably certain that the anions are the same or are very closely related in all compounds. The strong broad bands between 1100 cm−1 and 1500 cm−1 and their large shift with isotopic substitution is indicative of trigonal borate groups. Similarly the strong bands between 800 cm−1 and 1100 cm−1 and their strong isotopic dependence is indicative of tetrahedral boron. The bands at 725 cm−1 and 662 cm−1 in La2O3·3B211O3 and their observed shifts may also be taken to indicate the presence of 4-fold and 3-fold coordinated boron, respectively. As shown later, these spectra have many similarities with these of the pentaborates.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Absorption spectra of rare earth metaborates.

Table 11.

Infrared absorption spectra of rare earth metaborates 1(cm−1)

La2O33B2O3
Nd2O33B2O3 Sm2O33B2O3 EU2O33B2O3
B10 B11
1495sb 1445sb 1456sb 1470svb 1460svb
1410sb 1392sb 1376sb 1376sb 1380sb
1380svb -------------- -------------- 1308svb --------------
1280svb -------------- --------------
1210svb 1215sb 1215sb
1183svb 1167sb -------------- 1165svb --------------
1108sb -------------- -------------- -------------- 1115wsh
1053sb 1044sb 1042sb 1056svb 1048s
972s 981s 975s
964sb 952sb 950m 937wsh --------------
905svb 870sb 890svb 911svb 903svb
863msh 861msh
808s 813s 810s
811sb 789sb 792msh 795wsh 795wsh
767m 761s 770m
776 757m 755msh 756s 756msh
744msh -------------- -------------- --------------
730s 725wsh 710mb 727s --------------
717wsh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
689sb 662s 672s 668s 670s
661s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
614s 605s 612s 612s 611s
578s 572s 580s 581m 583sb
523s 516s 522s 556m --------------
525s 524sb
492 492 490
1

The molar ratio of only La2O3·3B2O3 is known. The others are not known. X-ray difiraction and phase equilibrium data indicate that the europium and possibly samarium may have different compositions from that given here.

6.3. Pyroborates

The divalent metals form compounds with a 2:1 ratio of oxides which have empirical formulas X2B2O5 and can be classed as pyroborates. Typical spectra are shown in figure 10 and the absorption bands are tabulated in table 12. From the figure it is observed that the spectra are quite similar and are of intermediate complexity. The lead pyroborate, however, as shown by the tabular data is somewhat different. Considering first the isotopic substitution data on 2CaO·B2O3, the two modes derived from ν2 of the trigonal ion are probably represented by the 723 cm−1 and 713 cm−1 bands tabulated for the B11 compound. The 713 cm−1 band is not shown in figure 10 but is frequently resolved as a shoulder on the 723 cm−1 band. The overlap of the two modes is believed to produce the rather broad intense band above 700 cm−1 in all spectra of figure 10. The bands at 670 cm−1 and 618 cm−1 are identified by their relative independence of isotope mass as two of the modes derived from ν4. The other two components of ν4 are not apparent. They may be too weak to be observed, may coincide in frequency with the observed bands, or may overlap the band at 723 cm−1 which is apparently complex. The 474 cm−1 mode is probably an ionic distortion mode and may be tentatively assigned as the coupled bending mode. Two twisting modes probably are beyond the frequency range used. The symmetric stretch can be identified with the isotope independent frequency at 1012 cm−1. The other mode derived from ν1 is not apparent and may correspond to the 803 cm−1 band. This band, however, may also originate from combinations or overtones from a low frequency mode. The four modes derived from ν3 of the trigonal ion are located between 1150 cm−1 and 1400 cm−1. There are at least six bands observed in this region for 2CaO·B211O3 and at least two of these—1177 cm−1 and 1450 cm−1—may be combinations or overtones. Therefore, with reasonable assurance the bands of table 12 can be assigned to the B2O5−4 ion in terms of the corresponding vibrations of the parent BO3−3 group. It is of interest to note that although the symmetric type stretching frequency in the pyroborates is essentially the same in the orthoborates, modes derived from of the trigonal ion extend to much higher frequencies. The higher frequencies are not unexpected in this case because all B—O bonds are not equivalent in the pyroborates [6] and a greater partial double bond character may be attributed to some bonds.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Absorption spectra of pyroborates.

From the data of table 12 it can be observed that the lead pyroborate exhibits a spectrum similar to the other pyroborates but containing more bands, particularly several strong bands in 800 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 region. There are also other bands at lower frequencies not found in the other pyroborates. Therefore, the anion in this compound probably does not consist of two coupled trigonal groups. The bands in the 800 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 region may be taken to indicate that tetrahedral boron is present and the low frequency bands are indicative of a large complex anion.

6.4. Triborates

Alkali borates formed with the 1:3 ratio of oxides have the empirical formula XB3O5. For purposes of this discussion they are classed as triborates. No structural data appear to be available on the compounds studied except Cs2O·3B2O3 [29]. The anion is quite complex and is composed of six-membered rings each containing 2 triangular and one tetrahedral boron, with the tetrahedral boron atoms being shared by two rings. Typical spectra are given in figure 11 for the isotopically substituted lithium compounds with the observed data being tabulated in table 13. From figure 11 it can be observed that the spectra are complex and indicative of a low symmetry and a large anion. The spectra are consistent with the presence of both trigonal and tetrahedral boron. The persistence of absorption bands which appear to be fundamentals to high frequencies is indicative that at least some of the B—O bonds have partial double bond character. The spectra and the shifts observed are not inconsistent with the six membered ring found in Cs2O·3B2O3 although the spectra are too complex to warrant any specific conclusions on this point without further information on the origin of the various bands.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Absorption spectra of lithium triborates.

Table 13.

Infrared absorption spectra of alkali triborates (XB3O5) (cm−1)

Li2O·3B2O3
Na2O·3B2O3 K2O·3B2O3 Cs2O·3B2O3
B10 & B11 B10 B11
1490sb 1540vsb 1490vsb strong broad strong broad 1455mb
1365sb 1410svd 1365svb bands to 1450 bands to 1450 1350mb
1258sb 1280vsb 1258svb 1270svb 1250–1280 1320sb
1228sb 1227sb 1250vsb
1137mb 1110mb --------------
1083sb 1097sb 1080sb 1070sb 1073mb 1080sb
1040sb 1030msh 1012msh
992sbsh 1007ssh 992ssh 970bsh 966sb 967sb
954vb 986sb 957sb 938s 937sb --------------
970sb
913b -------------- 913mb 901sb 892sb 907svb
928mb
882sb 900mb 885mb 850sb 862sb 847sb
849b 864mb 847svb 818s -------------- 797sb
771s 781m 774m 777msh -------------- 777msh
755msh 762msh 758msh 768s -------------- 759s
757wsh 758w 749s
746m --------------
730s 740m 723mb -------------- 735m --------------
723msh 730msh -------------- -------------- 720mb --------------
701m 692m 702sb
682msh -------------- 680m 684m 686wsh --------------
667m -------------- 671m 673m 663w --------------
686mb 662mb -------------- 654w 652mb
644m 653mb 639m 643w 646w --------------
637w -------------- --------------
602w -------------- 600mb? -------------- 601w --------------
572s 575mb 567mb 564m 567wb 563w
547w -------------- -------------- 549m -------------- 547w
528m 528m 525m 530s 522s 530s
501w -------------- -------------- 507s -------------- 510s
500wsh -------------- --------------
493msh -------------- --------------
469s -------------- 474msh
455s 455mb 454m 456wsh 450m 459s
431m 430 431w -------------- --------------
412w 412m 410m -------------- -------------- --------------
382m 386m 380m -------------- -------------- --------------
355m -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

6.5. Tetraborates (XnB4O7)

Both monovalent (alkali) and divalent metals form borates in a 1:2 ratio of oxides which have empirical formulas X2B4O7 and YB4O7, respectively. These compounds are classified as tetraborates.

a. Alkali Tetraborates

From the structure of lithium tetraborate reported by Krogh-Moe [28] it is expected that the spectra of the alkali tetraborates might give evidence for both 3- and 4-fold coordinated boron in a complex ring system of low symmetry. The spectra shown in figure 12 and the data of table 14 show that the results are in accord with the predictions. The strong bands and the isotopic shifts in Li2O·2B2O3 in the 800 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 region are indicative of tetrahedrally coordinated boron and the similar bands in the 1100 cm−1 to 1400 cm−1 region are indicative of 3-fold coordination. Similarly the 773 cm−1 and 676 cm−1 bands of the B11 compound are taken as indicative of the presence of the two types of boron. These conclusions have been verified by the NMR data of King and Bray [43]. The absorption at higher frequencies is strong and broad and is not tabulated for the compounds with the normal isotopic distribution. These bands, however, are resolved in the two isotopically substituted lithium tetraborates. There is a very close correlation between the spectra of the sodium and potassium tetraborates and the anions in these compounds are apparently identical but it is not clear from the spectra that the anion in Li2O·B2O3 is similar. In the case of the sodium and potassium compounds the correlation is so close that it is suspected that they may be isostructural. The data obtained on Na2O·2B2O3 appear to agree reasonably well with the spectrum given by Krogh-Moe [25]. It may be noted that some of the apparent discrepancies between the data for the lithium tetraborate and the sodium and potassium tetraborates may arise from the tighter packing which presumably occurs with the small lithium ion.

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Absorption spectra of alkali tetraborates.

Table 14.

Infrared absorption spectra of alkali tetraborates (X2B4O7) (cm−1)

Li2O·2B2O3
Na2O·2B2O3 K2O·2B2O3
B10&B11 B10 B11
1388vsb 1345svb
1160sb 1125sb 1148sb 1130msh
1090sb 1085mb
1046sb 1032sb
970sb 982svb 965sb 1010sb 978sb
955ssh 900– 915–
886sb -------------- 894ssh
861sb 915svb 874svb 836svb 835svb
779
771s 776sb 773sb 767m 763
745sh 748
725 730
718msh 721m 715m 717 718
707msh -------------- -------------- -------------- 687s
678m 696s 676s 675mb 670msh
650mb 668w 661msh 661m 660m
659s 649msh 636m 637m
611m 612m
596msh -------------- -------------- 583m 596s
566wsh -------------- -------------- 554m 553m
543s 548s 540s 513m 517m
508msh -------------- -------------- 490w 492w
504s 508s 502s 472w 476w
455w -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
416sh 416sh -------------- --------------
408s 408s -------------- --------------

b. Divalent Metal Tetraborates

The divalent metal tetraborates fall into two distinct groups with respect to their infrared spectra, Typical spectra for one type are shown in figure 13 and the data for all the compounds studied are compiled in table 15. From the tabulated absorption data it is clear that strong absorption occurs at much higher frequencies in the spectra of the calcium, barium, and zinc compounds than in those of strontium and lead. The presence of both 3-fold and 4-fold coordinated boron is indicated in the former compounds with a large anion of low symmetry. The structure reported for BaO·2B2O3 fulfills these requirements [7]. Although the tabular data indicate that the spectra of CaO·2B2O3, and ZnO·2B2O3 are very similar, this does not appear to be true. Comparison of the actual spectra shows marked differences in positions and relative intensities of many bands. On the basis of these data it seems improbable that the anions in these compounds are identical.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Absorption spectra of divalent metal tetraborates.

Table 15.

Infrared absorption spectra of divalent metal tetraborates (XB4O7) (cm−1)

CaO·2B2O3 BaO·2B2O3 ZnO·2B2O3 SrO·2B2O3
PbO·2B2O3
B10&B11 B10 B11
1435sb 1443mb -------------- 1450mvb -------------- -------------- --------------
1390sb 1400mb 1390sb -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1363sb 1332– 1342sb -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1305sb 1292svb 1298sb -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1247sb 1245sb 1260sb 1256sb -------------- -------------- --------------
1188sb 1163m 1237sb 1232sb 1260sb 1223sb 1230sb
1192msh -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1107msh 1165sb 1166sb 1168sb 1157sb 1166s
1090sb 1082wsh 1072sb 1045sb 1080– 1060– 1078sb
1052sb 1068mb 1047wsh 1025sb 970vsvb 950vsvb 1017sb
993sb 995sb 988sb 967sb -------------- -------------- 940sb
942sb 926sb 965 910mb -------------- -------------- --------------
910sb 887sb 906sb -------------- -------------- 905msh --------------
850sb 835sb 858sb 885s 891s 880s 880sb
818mb -------------- 832m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
793wsh 790m 810mb 808s 811s 806s 804s
776mb 761m 763msh 765sb 769sb 750sb 757sb
728m 735sb -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
706s 711m 716s 722m 731s 717ssh --------------
691wsh 679s 698msh 703m 702ssh 700ssh 702s
668m 660m 672w -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
658wsh 653w 655w 657s 669s 653s 651s
632 -------------- 643wb 639s 646m 636m 626s
600 606s -------------- -------------- 633vw 629vw --------------
592w -------------- 622s 619s 618s 608s
585 580w 582w 598msh -------------- 601wsh --------------
567s 557m 561m -------------- -------------- 581w --------------
534m 529 545 -------------- -------------- 566wsh --------------
505 496m -------------- 551s 549s 549s 540s
483 469s -------------- -------------- 540msh --------------
451s -------------- 510w 508s 508s 502s
388m -------------- -------------- 442 435 430m
411 411 412w
358m 357s 356s 342w

From figure 13, however, it can be seen that the spectra of SrO·2B2O3 and PbO·2B2O3 are so similar that a structural relationship is indicated. X-ray powder diffraction patterns show that these two compounds are isostructural [7]. The spectra may be interpreted in the usual manner to indicate tetrahedrally coordinated boron. There appear to be bands in the region above 1100 cm−1 which would ordinarily be taken as indicative of the presence of boron in 3-fold coordination. However, bands in this region are not intense, being much weaker than expected for fundamentals presumed to be related to the ν3 mode of triangular units. Therefore, it seems probable that these bands may represent overtones or combinations of some of the lower frequency modes. Although there is some evidence for the presence of boron in 3-fold coordination in the isotopic shifts observed for some bands in the 700 cm−1 region, the evidence cannot be considered unequivocal in the presence of such a complex spectrum. It is clear that the anions in these compounds are probably identical and complex. On the basis of the infrared spectrum it is concluded that the anions consist of tetrahedrally coordinated boron atoms with the presence of any boron in 3-fold coordination being doubtful. These conclusions are substantiated by the rather high density reported for SrO·2B2O3 [7].

Note added in proof: Work on the crystal structure of SrO·2B2O3 and PbO·2B2O3 has been completed by S. Block and A. Perloff. The structure, reported at the Annual Meeting of the American Crystallographic Association in Bozeman, Mont., July 1964, is found to contain only tetrahedral boron atoms. This result confirms the conclusions drawn from spectroscopic evidence alone. A paper on the structure is in preparation.

6.6. Pentaborates (XB5O8)

Some alkalies form compounds having a 1:5 ratio of the oxides and an empirical formula XB5O8 which are classified here as pentaborates. From the known structures [27] it is expected that the spectra should be complex and show evidence for both trigonal and tetrahedral boron. The spectra shown in figure 14 and the tabulated data of table 16 verify this prediction. In figure 14 it can be noted that the close similarity between the spectra of the rubidium and potassium compounds is indicative of their isostructural relationship [27]. The positions and isotopic shifts shown for the potassium pentaborate in table 16 are indicative of both 3-fold and 4-fold coordinated boron atoms. In the isotopically substituted compounds there appear to be several sets of “doublets” consisting of bands of equal strength, with a small separation, and similar isotopic shifts. Apparently overlapping of bands from B10 and B11 compounds obscure these doublets in the spectrum of the normal compound. In view of the fact that the anion is formed by coupling two six-membered ring by means of a tetrahedral boron atom common to both rings, the doublets may arise from similar coupled vibrations of the rings. The spectrum of Li2O·5B2O3 is very similar to those of the other two borates and it would not be surprising if the anion structure in all three pentaborates studied was identical.

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Absorption spectra of alkali pentaborates.

Table 16.

Infrared absorption spectra of alkali pentaborates (XB5O8) (cm−1)

Li2O·5B2O3 K2O·5B2O3
Rb2O·5B2O3
B10&B11 B10 B11
1400–1300 1433sb 1468sb 1419sb 1415svb
1275–1175vsb 1363m 1405m 1359s 1357m
1345m 1387m 1338m 1343m
1127m 1273sh 1372m 1334m --------------
1077m 1250–1190b 1257svb 1202svb 1250–1150svb
1090bsh
1055m 1066s 1084m 1061m 1055m
1020bsh 1030s 1040svb 1030svb 1028svb
1010–875svb 963m 974ssh 962s 961m
924sb 940svb 923svb 920sb
874s 877s 872s 870s
780s -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
765s 780s 791s 780s 780sb
725msh 715s 732s 714s 711s
711s -------------- --------------
700sb 688s 702s 684s 689sb
665ssh 674s 692msh 673ssh 670msh
640wsh 660msh 635msh 639m
636m -------------- --------------
588m 618m 630m 616m 615m
551m -------------- 508s 503s 509s
513m 501s 504s 500s 500s
468w 483s 489s 483s 484s
455w 449m 452w 449w 447m
420w 421w 422w 421w 418w
411w 412w 412w

The anions of the potassium and rubidium compounds may be considered as coupled modified boroxol rings. The presence of the tetrahedral boron should tend to decrease the strength of some of the B–O bonds in the ring and the coupling should tend to increase the effective mass of the coupling boron atom. Both effects would tend to decrease some observed frequencies below the corresponding modes of the boroxol ring. Furthermore from the lack of symmetry all modes of the modified boroxol ring should be active in this instance. Comparison of these spectra with those of the alkali metaborates is not too informative because of the poor spectra of the metaborates and their low infrared activity arising from symmetry. The only mode common to both compounds appears to be represented by the strong band identified as ν10 [14] in the alkali metaborates. This band occurs at 723 cm−1 in NaBO2 at 712 cm−1 in KBO2, 711 cm−1 in Rb2O·5B2O3, and 714 cm−1 in K2O·5B211O3. The position, character, and isotopic shift noted in the KBO2 and K2O·5B2O3 compounds are so similar that this band can be assigned tentatively as corresponding to ν10 (E′). Comparing the present data with these of Goubeau and Keller; the following tentative assignments may be made in the pentaborates: for Rb2O·5B2O3, (A1) 1150–1250 cm−1, ν2(A1)780cm1, ν3(A1)500cm1 or 509 cm−1, ν10 (E′)—711 cm−1; for K2O·5B2O3, ν1—1190 cm−1—1250 cm−1; ν2(A1)780cm1, ν3(A1)501cm1 or 508 cm−1, ν10 (E′)—715 cm−1. It is also expected that ν9 (E′) may fall in the regions given for ν1 contributing to the strength and broadness of these bands. The bands at 484 cm−1 and 483 cm−1 in the pentaborates probably correspond to ν7(A2) which are strongly active in these compounds because of low symmetry. With this assignment it seems probable that the bands at 963 cm−1 and 961 cm−1 are the first overtones of ν7. Although these assignments can only be taken as possibilities the relative insensitivity of these band positions to the substituents as demonstrated by Goubeau and Keller [15] lends some support to the proposed assignment.

6.7. Octoborates (XnB8O13)

The alkali metals together with barium of the alkaline earth metals form borates with a 1:4 ratio of the oxides. The empirical formula of the anion is B8O132, classified here as an octaborate. Typical spectra of these compounds are given in figure 15 and the data obtained are compiled in table 17. As expected and as shown in figure 15 a spectrum extremely rich with bands is obtained. All compounds show bands in positions taken to be characteristic of both 3-fold and 4-fold coordination of boron, and the isotopic shifts observed with lithium octaborate strengthens this conclusion. From the spectral data alone it seems very unlikely that the same anion is present in any of these compounds. Lithium octaborate in particular shows a large number of absorption bands but these may be due in part to Li–O vibrational modes, detected in this range because of the small mass of the cation. No structural data are available to assist in the interpretation and without some information of this type any attempt to explain these spectra is of dubious value.

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Absorption spectra of alkali octaborates.

Table 17.

Infrared absorption spectra of the octaborates (Xn B8O13) (cm−1)

Li2O·4B2O3
Na2O·4B2O3 K2O·4B2O3 BaO·4B2O3
B10 B11
1548sb 1502sb -------------- -------------- --------------
1455svb 1450svb 1490svb 1425svb 1420–1320svb
1430sb 1382sb 1370sb --------------
1400sb 1355sb 1345sb 1357svb --------------
1375sb 1328sb 1318mb 1312svb --------------
1342sb 1300svb -------------- -------------- --------------
1305sb 1265sb 1255sb -------------- 1268sb
1277sb 1239sb -------------- -------------- --------------
1262sb 1224sb 1210svb 1192svb 1227sb
1168sb 1124mb -------------- -------------- 1190sb
1143sb 1098m 1102mb -------------- 1095sb
1110msh 1074msh 1080mb 1066sb 1075mb
1084sb 1054m -------------- -------------- --------------
1031m 1013msh 1020sb 1034sb --------------
990sb 976sb 1002mb -------------- --------------
965sb 942sb 983msh 961msh 968svb
-------------- 928msh 935m 925svb --------------
917sb 888mb 905msh 890mb --------------
885sb
872m 867bsh -------------- 872msh 865mb
857m 847bsh -------------- -------------- --------------
843msb 838ssb 838msh -------------- --------------
784sb 781s 807s 787mb 795mb
781w
770s 767s 766s 775mb 765mb
738msh 723m 738msh 716mb 723sb
720s -------------- 702msh -------------- --------------
711s 690s 688s 686mvb 698mb
694msh 673m -------------- -------------- 673mb
682m 660w -------------- 668m 655mb
655msh 635w 641m -------------- --------------
624m 612m 615m -------------- 593sb
597s 589m 575s -------------- --------------
557m 552m -------------- -------------- 544msh
530s -------------- 533m -------------- --------------
518s 518sb 526s 500s 515s
500s -------------- --------------
468m 467m 473w 484s 490sb
456m 455m 450m 449m --------------
423w -------------- 427m -------------- --------------

6.8. Miscellaneous Borates

In this section data are presented for those borates which cannot be readily classified in the previous categories. These will represent in most instances individual borates of odd compositions or groups of borates whose classification as to anion type is obviously of no value.

a. Rare Earth 3:1 Borates

Levin and McDaniel [35] have observed that the rare earths form borates having a nominal oxide ratio of 3:1. There is doubt at this time that the ratio remains constant throughout the series of rare earth borates but there is no question that the compounds are formed. Inasmuch as the rare earth oxides produce no appreciable absorption in the frequency range used here, satisfactory spectra of the desired borates will be obtained if the quantity of oxide is in excess of the amount required for compound formation. If, as now appears likely, the compounds are of the 3:1 ratios or less, materials formed by a 3:1 oxide ratio should produce spectra of the borate only. From powder x-ray diffraction data on the compounds it is found that the 3:1 compounds of lanthanum, praseodymium, and neodymium are most probably isostructural. From samarium to ytterbium, however, a new structure oi perhaps new structures (and probably different compositions) appear to form. This behavior is observed in typical spectra shown in figures 16 and 17 and the data tabulated in table 18. It is noted in figure 16 that the spectrum is characteristic of trigonal BO3 groups with bands derived from the 4 modes of the trigonal ion apparent. The isotopic substitution effects shown for the lanthanum compound in figure 16 show that the bands in the 1200 cm−1 region are analogous to ν3, the 937 cm−1 band to ν1, the 700 cm−1 region bands to ν2 and the 600 cm−1 region bands to ν4 of the trigonal ion. However, at least 3 bands appear in each of the ν3, ν2, and ν4 regions and the spectra are not typical of isolated trigonal ions. They are also not typical of either the pyroborate ion, the boroxol ring, or chains of triangular groups. It appears that the spectra of the first few members of the 3:1 rare earth borates are indicative of a new type of anion which is most probably a polymer formed of BO3 groups.

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Absorption spectra of 3:1 rare earth borates.

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Absorption spectra of 3:1 rare earth borates.

Table 18.

Infrared absorption spectra of the 3:1 rare earth borates (cm−1)

3La2O3B2O3
3Pr2O3B2O3 3Nd2O3B2O3 3Sm2O3B2O3 3Eu2O3B2O3
B10 B11
1385w 1385w 1386w 1386mb
1325wsh 1325sbsh
1338msh 1296msh 1310msh 1308msh -------------- --------------
1277svb 1279svb
1292s 1250svb 1262svb 1267svb -------------- --------------
1272ssh 1230sbsh 1240sb 1238svb 1242svb --------------
1225svb 1182svb 1180svb 1194svb 1200svb --------------
1177svb 1177svb
999sb
999sb
938m 937m 945m 971m -------------- --------------
920w -------------- -------------- --------------
903m -------------- 910vw 904m
-------------- 847w -------------- 832sb
778m 780m -------------- --------------
768m
760w
781s 753s 751s 750s 751s 750wsh
749s -------------- 747s --------------
767w 739vw -------------- -------------- 740s --------------
732s 726s --------------
732sb 713sb 713sb 727s 715s 707s
688msh
646m 650m --------------
622mb
609m 606m 607bsh -------------- 587m 596s
590m 588msh 580mb 582mb -------------- 542sb
559m 576m -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
3Gd2O3B2O3 3Tb2O3B2O3 3Dy2O3B2O3 3Ho2O3B2O3 3Er2O3B2O3 3Tm2O3B2O3
1392wb 1385w 1385w 1385w 1385w 1385vwsh
1325sbsh 1335sbsh 1344msh 1349msh 1352msh 1355msh
1295sb 1300sb 1305sb 1302sb 1310sb
1280svb -------------- 1272ssh 1277msh 1270msh --------------
1265msh 1272mb
1220sbsh 1228ssh 1232ssh 1232sb 1242sb
1197sb 1194sb 1212sb
1180svb 1180svb 1185sb -------------- -------------- --------------
1045svb 1045ssh 1047ssh 1050ssh 1055ssh
1032ssh
998sb 1008sb 1008msh -------------- -------------- --------------
968sb 982sb 986s 994sb l000sb 1012sb
940m 942m 945m 950sb
920w 922w 925m 932m
905m 910sb 912w 914wsh -------------- --------------
830sb 840sb 840sb 849sb 850sb 858sb
788wb 782wb 790wb --------------
770m 770m 772msh 770msh 770msh 770msh
767w -------------- 735sbsh 741ssh 748s 758s
752msh -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 750s
743msh -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
734msh 723s 723s 723s 722s 721s
707s 708s 708s 709s 707s 708s
682mb 680wb -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
636mb 637m 641mb 647mb
598s 600w 602m 603m 605m --------------
550sb -------------- 557m 557sb 567sb 567sb

Starting at 3Eu2O3·B2O3 and continuing to 3Tm2O3·B2O3 the marked change observed in figure 17 occurs in these spectra. Strong bands in the 800 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 range occur which are indicative of boron with 4-fold coordination. Simultaneously new absorption bands appear in the 700 cm−1 to 800 cm−1 region which tend to confirm the indication. As the increase in atomic weight in the rare earth series is accompanied by a decrease in ionic radius, it would be expected that the packing in the unit cell increases as the mass of the cation increases. In the anion, however, closer packing can be accomplished by increase in coordination of boron from 3 to 4. Therefore, the increase in coordination indicated by these spectra is not surprising, and it would not be surprising if the composition of the compounds also changed. It should be noted, however, that there is still evidence for boron in 3-fold coordination in addition to the 4-fold coordination so that the anions are probably quite complex.

b. Bismuth Borates

The bismuth borates form in ratios of oxides which are unlike the other trivalent ions in most instances and the spectra of all the compounds are discussed here. No isotopically pure compounds were prepared for these compounds. Typical spectra are shown in figure 18 and the absorption frequencies are tabulated in table 19. The spectra of figure 18 all exhibit strong bands to low frequencies as well as numerous bands which are nearly coincident in the different compounds. It was suspected that these bands might arise, in part from bismuth oxide impurities or from Bi—O bond modes. However, the pure oxide itself shows no absorption spectrum in this frequency range. The spectrum of the 2:1 compound is surprisingly simple and gives evidence of boron only in 3-fold coordination. The absence of strong bands just above 700 cm−1 (the ν2 region for trigonal ions) and the apparent presence of modes derived from ν2 at 685 cm−1 and 680 cm−1 may be taken to indicate that the anion is a complex polymer of trigonal BO3 groups. The occurrence of low frequency bands supports this idea. Because of the simplicity of the spectrum it is probable that a highly symmetrical ion is present. The other bismuth borates show evidence of polymeric anions containing both 3-fold and 4-fold coordinated boron. It is apparent from the many points of similarity that the anions are very closely related in the 3:5, 1:3, and 1:4 compounds. Furthermore, the spectrum of the 1:3 bismuth borate is quite similar (but not identical) with the spectra of the 1:3 rare earth borates, and all the bismuth borate compounds except the 2:1 compound show spectra with marked resemblances to the spectra the other metal borates that have high proportions of B2O3.

Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Absorption spectra of bismuth borates.

Table 19.

Infrared absorption spectra of the bismuth borates (cm−1)

2Bi2O3·B2O3 3Bi2O3·5B2O3 Bi2O3·3B2O3 Bi2O3·4B2O3
1422msh 1430bsh 1448svb
1383msh -------------- 1376svb
1365bsh --------------
1309msh 1313sb 1322sb --------------
1284sb 1288bsh --------------
1258sh 1242sb 1237vsb 1238svb
1203sb -------------- -------------- 1191ssh
1170sb 1156msh -------------- --------------
1130msh
1122sb 1120mb --------------
1089s -------------- --------------
1068sb 1067sb 1074sb
1036sb 1037sb --------------
972svb --------------
942sb 942m 930msh
908w 907wsh 894mb 890svb
837svb 835svb 835svb
796m 797m --------------
767s 765m --------------
753m 750s
736m 736wsh -------------- --------------
716m 725s 723s 722s
703m 707m --------------
685s 689m 690w 689mb
680s 679s 679s --------------
655m 654m 653w
623w
603sb -------------- -------------- 595msh
578sb 574s 577s 579s
536s 533s 529s
523sb -------------- -------------- --------------
506s 506s 503s
481 svb -------------- -------------- --------------
470m 470w 470w
448s 440s 436sb
388s 388s 389sb
370sb 370ssh 370ssh --------------
310sb --------------

c. Odd Borates

Several borates are formed in systems already discussed in apparent odd ratios of metal oxide to boric oxide. These spectra are given here, together with those of compounds of doubtful composition. Representative spectra are not shown but the observed absorption bands are given in table 20. No detailed discussion of these spectra will be attempted. The questions concerning the composition of the 5:2 zinc borate have been noted previously (sec. 6.2.c). The spectrum would be consistent with boron in 3-fold coordination except for the strong band at 940 cm−1 which may indicate tetrahedral boron. In the 4:1 lead borate only trigonal boron is indicated. The 3:1 copper borate, whose exact composition is not established, gives indications of only 3-fold coordination of boron as would be expected from the nominal formula. The spectrum shows an interesting series of weak broad bands in the 858 cm−1 to 1032 cm−1 range which may be indicative of impurities. In the 5:2 zinc borate, the 4:1 lead borate and the 3:1 copper borate the spectra all indicate polymeric anions composed of trigonal BO3 groups. The 5:4 lead borate spectrum indicates both coordinations of boron and the aluminum borate spectrum is complicated by the possibility of Al—O bond vibrations occurring in this spectral range. The 1:9 cesium borate spectrum shows very strong absorption throughout the range 500 cm−1 to 1500 cm−1 with no clearly resolved bands. At least a part of the broad absorption may arise from the glassy phase which is known to be present in small amounts. The only clearly recognizable feature of this spectrum consists of a complex group of bands near 460 cm−1.

Table 20.

Infrared absorption frequencies of “odd” borates (cm−1)

5ZnO2B2O3 4PbOB2O3 5PbO4B2O3 3CuOB2O3 9A12O32B2O3 Cs2O9B2O3
1307svb 1329m 1292sb 1500m 1412sb --------------
1237svb 1278s -------------- 1480m 1390sb --------------
1247s 1232sb 1340sb 1327sb Very strong broad absorption
1085sb 1179sb 1196m 1192mb 1260sb
1132m 1152sb 1230m
1040mb -------------- 1107m -------------- 1189s 1500cm-1 to 600cm-1
1037sb 1032wb 1100mbsh
991wsh 972m 975sb 980wb 1025mbsh
927sb 942wb -------------- --------------
940svb -------------- 900ssh 910wb -------------- --------------
891w -------------- 888wb 875sb --------------
820svb 858wb -------------- --------------
883w -------------- -------------- -------------- 827mvb --------------
863w -------------- 792sb -------------- 798sb --------------
756s 765sb -------------- 775msh --------------
728s 750msh 737msh 732s --------------
715sb -------------- 722m 722s 710msh --------------
709w 711m 696s 693m --------------
672s 690s 702m 671s 669s --------------
608s 681s 663s -------------- --------------
620mb -------------- 661s 648ssh -------------- --------------
628m 611m -------------- --------------
955mb -------------- 609s 594m 601svb --------------
559s 582s -------------- -------------- --------------
475s 521m 567msh 553m 552sb --------------
503m 560msh -------------- 524m --------------
437s -------------- 509s 508s 493sb 505ssh
476s 477s 458m 460sb
415s -------------- 434s 439ssh 443m --------------
408sb 418s 433s 418m --------------
377vsb 356sb 409s -------------- -------------- --------------
399s 397s -------------- --------------
370s 375s -------------- --------------

d. Borates Containing Only Tetrahedrally Coordinated Boron

The three borates discussed in this section are known to contain boron only in BO4 groups and consist of the 1:1 compounds of Ta2O5, As2O5, and P2O5 with B2O3. The structures are known for all of these compounds which have the empirical formulae ABO4 with A representing Ta, P, or As. Both PBO4 and AsBO4 form crystals of space group S42C2 [46] and TaBO4, which is isostructural with zircon is of space group Dh19 [58]. The latter compound is expected to give a spectrum typical of tetrahedrally coordinated boron with all normal modes active. Coupling with the modes arising from Ta-O bonds is not expected to be important because of the relative weakness of these bonds and the large mass of the Ta atoms. It was determined experimentally that Ta2O5 showed no absorption in the frequency range used here. The compounds PBO4 and AsBO4 both contain two distinct types of tetrahedra, one of which is the BO4 unit, the other either PO4 or AsO4 tetrahedra. The two types of tetrahedra are connected at corners and each oxygen is therefore shared by boron and either phosphorous or arsenic. The P—O and As—O bonds are expected to be similar in strength to the B—O bonds and the infrared spectrum will be expected to be representative of tightly coupled oscillators having at least some fundamentals nearly equal in frequency.

The spectra obtained on these compounds are shown in figure 19 and the observed absorption bands are tabulated in table 21. The spectrum of Ta2O5·B2O3 shows 3 strong bands at 840 cm−1, 579 cm−1, and 490 cm−1, which have been assigned tentatively as corresponding to ν3, ν1 and ν4, respectively. The missing ν2 band may be located near 300 cm−1 and may correspond to the apparent absorption band observed in figure 19. However, the location of ν2 or its presence in the spectrum is not certain because of the low energy available near 300 cm−1. The assignments given are plausible and consistent with the expected strengths and complexities of the ν3 and ν4 bands. The assignments were not corroborated by isotopic substitution because of the difficulties involved in preparing the tantalum borate but it appears very probable that this spectrum should be characteristic of the isolated borate tetrahedral unit.

Figure 19.

Figure 19.

Absorption spectra of compounds containing tetrahedrally coordinated boron.

Table 21.

Infrared absorption spectra of compounds containing only tetrahedrally coordinated boron (cm−1)

TaBO4 PBO4
AsBO4
B11 & B10 B10 B11 B11 & B10
840vsvb,ν3 1095vsb 1065vsb 1085vsb 930vsb
579s,ν1 925vsb 925vsb 923vsb 858?s
490svb,ν4 615sb 610sb 617sb 480s
300svb?,ν2 550sb 535sb 537sb 385sb

Although the spectra of PBO4 and AsBO4 are very simple in appearance their interpretation is not clear. First it should be noted that all bands in these compounds with one exception (the 858 cm−1 band) are very broad and the tabulated data are subject to considerable uncertainty. In addition it is possible that variations of index of refraction of the powdered specimens may produce artifacts in the observed spectra—the 858 cm−1 band is suspected in this connection. It should be noted that the normal frequencies of the isolated PO43 ion are given as ν1 ≈ 980 cm−1, ν2 ≈ 363 cm−1, ν3 ≈ 1082 cm−1, and ν4 ≈ 515 cm−1. Comparing these values and those for TaBO4 in table 21 with the observed frequencies for PBO4 shows no clear correlation. The fact that substitution of As for P in the structure produces strong shifts of all bands plus the fact that isotopic substitution of boron in a given compound results in shifts which appear to be in unexpected directions forces the conclusion that in a system of such tightly coupled oscillators, individual group frequencies cannot be recognized readily.

7. Spectroscopic Identification of Borate Anions

From the studies described some generalizations on the character of the borate anion can be made on the basis of the observed spectrum. Under normal conditions the spectrum will be complicated by the presence of B10 and B11 isotopes in their natural abundance and recognition of the weaker, higher frequency bands arising from the B10 isotope is essential for purposes of identification.

As regards the problem of coordination of the boron, it can be concluded that the group frequency correlations may have certain validity in the spectra of the borates, regardless of the exact structure of the anion. Characteristic bands may shift by as much as 100 cm−1 or more depending on the structure so that conclusions must be made with caution particularly when very complex anions are involved.

With these reservations in mind, it can be concluded that boron in 3-fold coordination is characterized by the presence of strong, broad absorption in the region 1100 cm−1 to 1300 cm−1. This band (or more generally bands) is one of the strongest and most prominent features of the spectrum. In addition there is always absorption in the 700 cm−1 to 780 cm−1 region (derived from ν2 of the trigonal ion) which is strong, usually sharp, and frequently (but by no means always) consists of a single band. Both of these characteristic bands are strongly dependent on isotope mass and isotopic substitution can be used to differentiate the desired bands from others which occur in the same frequency region.

Boron in 4-fold coordination can be determined with much less certainty, particularly when boron in 3-fold coordination is also present. Based on the present (and previous work) it may be concluded that the most characteristic feature is the presence of strong, broad absorption in the 800 cm−1 to 1100 cm−1 region. This band (or bands) is very strong and broad and its position is strongly sensitive to isotope mass. Absorption in the 600 cm−1 to 800 cm−1 region can be distinguished from the absorption of boron in 3-fold coordination by the fact that it is relatively insensitive to isotopic mass. Caution must be exercised in this case to recognize overtones and combination bands which may be found in the region above 1100 cm−1 and be mistaken for fundamentals of trigonal borate groups. Overtones and combinations may be strongly dependent on isotope mass but may be differentiated from the fundamentals by their relative weakness compared to the fundamental bands. It appears to be characteristic of tetrahedral borates that reasonably strong absorption bands are found at much lower frequencies than in the trigonal borates (for example a band is generally observed near 470 cm−1 which may be derived from ν4) but this observation is of little diagnostic value. Complex borate anions give rise to a large number of low frequency modes so that the tetrahedral boron bands, if present, cannot be identified with assurance.

The identity of individual anions can be determined with assurance in a limited number of cases only. The best identification can be made in the case of the planar BO3 group. This spectrum is defined by the strong absorption above 1100 cm−1 which may be split into two bands, a strong band in the 700 cm−1 to 800 cm−1 region, and one or two weaker bands below 700 cm−1. A weak sharp band near 1000 cm−1 may appear (see figs. 1 and 2).

The pyroborate ion can probably be recognized from its spectrum. In this case the diagnostic region appears to be the 600 cm−1 to 800 cm−1 region which exhibits three strong bands (see fig. 10). Additional bands may appear slightly above 800 cm−1 but they are much weaker. A sharp moderately strong band will also appear near 1000 cm−1. Bands at still higher frequencies will occur but only the appearance of the strong 3-fold coordination bands above 1100 cm−1 is of concern.

Compounds with infinite chains of triangles yield spectra very similar to those of the pyroborates. In the former, however, the bands appear to be broader, more complex in internal structure, and less easily resolved. The band near 1000 cm−1 is weak and may not be observed. The strong bands above 1100 cm−1 are also present but broader and less readily resolved than in the pyroborates.

Provided the spectrum obtained for TaBO4 is typical of an isolated tetrahedral BO4 group, the characteristics appear to be principally in the strong broad band near 840 cm−1 and the slightly weaker band near 490 cm−1. The bands near 579 cm−1 and 300 cm−1 are not considered to be diagnostic features because they may be inactive in many instances.

Any attempt to identify more complex borate anions solely on the basis of their infrared spectra does not appear possible at this time. Spectra containing large numbers of bands, particularly in the region below 600 cm−1 may be taken to be indicative of structurally complex anions of low symmetry. Further detailed interpretations can be made only as x-ray structural data become available for more of the borates.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to E. R. Lippincott for valuable suggestions.

Footnotes

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

8. References

  • [1].Anderson S., Bohan R., and Kimpton D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 38, 370 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Bauer H., Z. anorg alleg. Chem. 320, 306 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Berger S. V., Acta Chem. Scan. 4, 1054 (1950). [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Berger S. V., Acta Cryst. 5, 389 (1952). [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Berger S. V., Acta Chem. Scan. 3, 660 (1949). [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Block S., Burley G., Perloff A., and Mason R. D. Jr., J. Research NBS 62, 95 (1959). [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Block S., Perloff A., and Weir C., Acta Cryst. 17, 314 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Buchler A. and Marram E. P., J. Chem. Phys. 39, 292 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Carlson E. T., BS J. Res. 9, 825 (1932). [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Davis H. M. and Knight M. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 28, 97 (1945). [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Decius J. C., J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1290 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Fang S. M., Z. Krist. 99, 1 (1938). [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Geller R. F. and Bunting E. N., J. Research NBS 18, 585 (1937). [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Goubeau J. and Hummel D., Z. Physik. Chem. 20, 15 (1959). [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Goubeau J. and Keller H., Z anorg. alleg. Chem. 272, 303 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Hand W. D. and Krogh-Moe J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45, 197 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Harrison D. E. and Hummel F. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 103, 496 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Hart P. B. and Smallwood S. E. F., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 24, 1047 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Herzberg G., Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure, II, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules (D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York, N.Y. 1949). [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Hirayama C. and Subbarao E. C., Phys. Chem. Glasses 3, 111 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Hohne E. and Kutschabsky L., Z. Chem. 1, 33 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ingerson E., Morey G., and Tuttle O. F., Am. J. Sci. 246, 38 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Konovalov P. F., Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 70, 849 (1950). [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Krogh-Moe J., Z. Krist. 117, 166 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Krogh-Moe J., Arkiv f. Kemi 12, 475 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Krogh-Moe J., Arkiv f. Kemi 12, 247 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Krogh-Moe J., Arkiv f. Kemi 14, 439 (1959). [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Krogh-Moe J., Acta Cryst, 15, 190 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Krogh-Moe J., Acta Cryst, 13, 889 (I960). [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Lehmann H. and Tiess D., Chem. Tech. 11, 260 (1959). [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Levin E. M., Roth R. S., and Martin J. B., Am. Mineral. 46, 1030 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Levin E. M. and McDaniel C. L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45, 355 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Levin E. M., Robbins C. R., and Waring J. L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44, 87 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Levin E. M. and McMurdie H. F., J. Research NBS 42, 131 (1949). [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Levin E. AI. and AlcDaniel C. L. (private communication).
  • [36].Marezio AI., Plettinger H. A., and Zachariasen W. H., Acta Cryst. 16, 390 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Marezio M., Plettinger H. A., and Zachariasen W. H., Acta Cryst. 16, 594 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Alazzetti C. and de Carli F., Gazz. chim. ital. 56, 23 (1926). [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Miller F. A. and Wilkins C. H., Anal. Chem. 24, 1253 (1952). [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Morey G. W. and Merwin H. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 2248 (1936). [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Mrose M. E., Geol. Soc. Am., Program Annual Meetings 1961, p. 111. [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Perloff A. and Shumate P. (private communication).
  • [43].Ring P. J. and Bray P. J., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 9, 24 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Rollet A. P., Compt. Ren. 200, 1763 (1935). [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Rollet A. P. and Bouaziz R., Compt. rend. 240, 2418 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Sastry B. S. R. and Hummel F. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 41, 7 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Scholze H., Z. anorg. Chem. 284, 272 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Schroeder R., Weir C. E., and Lippincott E. R., J. Research NBS 66A, 407 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Schulze G. E. R., Z. Physik Chem. (B) 24, 215 (1934). [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Smith P., Garcia-Bianco S. and Rivoir L., Ann. Fisica Quim. 57A, 263 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Smith P., Garcia-Bianco S. and Rivoir L., Z. Krist. 115, 460 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Steele W. C. and Decius J. C., J. Chem. Phys. 25, 1184 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Subbarao E. C. and Hummel F. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 103, 29 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Takeuchi Y., Acta Cryst. 5, 574 (1952). [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Takeuchi Y., Mineral. J. (Japan) 2, 245 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Weir C. E. and Van Valkenburg A., J. Research NBS 64A, 103 (1960). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Weir C. E. and Lippincott E. R., J. Research NBS 65A, 173 (1961). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Zachariasen W. H., Pro. Nat. Acad. Sci. 17, 617 (1931). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Zachariasen W. H. and Ziegler G. E., Z. Krist. 83, 354 (1932). [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Zachariasen W. H., J. Chem. Phys. 5, 919 (1937). [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Zaspavskii A. I. and Zvinchuk R. A., Doklad. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 90, 781 (1953). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES