Skip to main content
Endoscopic Ultrasound logoLink to Endoscopic Ultrasound
. 2019 Mar 12;8(2):133–135. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_68_18

Transluminal intrahepatic bile duct stone removal using coaxial basket catheter via the previously created EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy tract (with videos)

Takeshi Ogura 1,, Nobu Nishioka 1, Kazuhide Higuchi 1
PMCID: PMC6482608  PMID: 30880726

Intrahepatic bile duct stone (IHBDS) removal is usually performed under contraindication of ERCP. However, if patients are complicated with contraindication of ERCP such as surgical anatomy or duodenal obstruction, this procedure may be challenging. As alternative method, EUS-guided transluminal biliary drainage has been developed.[1,2,3] Recently, various techniques, such as antegrade stone removal, have been also reported under EUS guidance.[4,5] However, antegrade stone removal has risk of complicating acute pancreatitis and technically difficult because push ability of devices may be limited due to the structure of biliary tract itself. If stone removal is attempted through the fistula, stone removal is also challenging due to the same reasons although risk of acute pancreatitis may not be absence. Herein, we described technical tips for IHBDS using novel basket catheter (COAXiS, Gadelius Medical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) [Figure 1] through EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The novel basket catheter (COAXiS, Gadelius Medical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Diameter of this catheter is 8 Fr, and site of basket is made from nitinol wire. In addition, this catheter is coaxial with the guidewire

An 82-year-old man underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture, which was complicated followed by extrahepatic bile duct resection for gallbladder stones 10 years ago. Frequent cholangitis due to IHBDS was observed [Figure 2]. He did not agree with undergoing PTBD; therefore, EUS-HGS using covered metal stent (10 mm × 10 cm, Niti-S Biliary Cover Stent, TaeWoong Medical, Seoul, Korea) was attempted [Video 1]. After 7 days, IHBDS removal was attempted because the operability of devices was limited due to long covered metal stent. First, the contrast medium was injected, and IHBDS was seen [Figure 3]. Then, metal stent was removed. Because IHBDS was relatively large, therefore, stone fragmentation using electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) under cholangioscopy (SpyGlass DS; SPY-DS, Boston Scientific, Japan) was attempted [Figure 4]. An electrohydraulic shock wave generator (Lithotron EL27, Walz Elektronik GmbH, Germany) was used to generate shock waves of increasing frequency, which were applied as a continuous sequence of discharges during EHL. A 2.4-Fr EHL probe was used, and EHL was performed under SPY-DS guidance. After IHBDS fragmentation was obtained, stone removal was performed using basket catheter. Because this basket was coaxial with the guidewire, we easily performed this procedure and successfully performed IHBDS removal [Figure 5 and Video 2]. Finally, plastic stent deployment was performed from the intrahepatic bile duct to the stomach without any adverse events. Our technique using novel basket catheter may be useful for IHBD stone removal through EUS-HGS.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The intrahepatic bile duct stones are seen on computed tomography (arrow)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The intrahepatic bile duct stones are seen on cholangiography

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy is attempted under cholangioscopic guidance

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The intrahepatic bile duct stone removal is successfully performed through EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy route

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initial will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Videos available on: www.eusjournal.com

Download video file (5.6MB, mp4)
Download video file (9.9MB, mp4)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Boulay BR, Lo SK. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018;28:171–85. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Teoh AY, Dhir V, Kida M, et al. Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: Results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel. Gut. 2018;67:1209–28. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baars JE, Kaffes AJ, Saxena P. EUS-guided biliary drainage: A comprehensive review of the literature. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7:4–9. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_105_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Hara K, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment of bile duct stone in patients with surgically altered anatomy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:227–33. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Itoi T, Sofuni A, Tsuchiya T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal in patients with surgically altered anatomy: Case series and technical review (with videos) J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:E86–93. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Download video file (5.6MB, mp4)
Download video file (9.9MB, mp4)

Articles from Endoscopic Ultrasound are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES