Skip to main content
Biology of Reproduction logoLink to Biology of Reproduction
. 2018 Nov 18;100(4):1035–1045. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy247

Seminal vesicle secretory protein 7, PATE4, is not required for sperm function but for copulatory plug formation to ensure fecundity

Taichi Noda 1, Yoshitaka Fujihara 1, Takafumi Matsumura 1,2, Seiya Oura 1,2, Sumire Kobayashi 1,2, Masahito Ikawa 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC6483057  PMID: 30452524

Abstract

Seminal vesicle secretions (SVSs), together with spermatozoa, are ejaculated into the female reproductive tract. SVS7, also known as PATE4, is one of the major SVS proteins found in the seminal vesicle, copulatory plug, and uterine fluid after copulation. Here, we generated Pate4 knockout (−/−) mice and examined the detailed function of PATE4 on male fecundity. The morphology and weight of Pate4−/− seminal vesicles were comparable to the control. Although Pate4−/− cauda epididymal spermatozoa have no overt defects during in vitro fertilization, Pate4−/− males were subfertile. We found that the copulatory plugs were smaller in the vagina of females mated with Pate4−/− males, leading to semen leakage and a decreased sperm count in the uterus. When the females mated with Pate4−/− males were immediately re-caged with Pate4+/+ males, the females had subsequent productive matings. When the cauda epididymal spermatozoa were injected into the uterus and plugged artificially [artificial insemination (AI)], Pate4−/− spermatozoa could efficiently fertilize eggs as compared to wild-type spermatozoa. We finally examined the effect of SVSs on AI, and observed no difference in fertilization rates between Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− SVSs. In conclusion, PATE4 is a novel factor in forming the copulatory plug that inhibits sequential matings and maintains spermatozoa in the uterus to ensure male fecundity.

Keywords: artificial insemination, coagulating gland, mouse, semen leakage, sperm fertilizing ability, sequential mating


The copulatory plug has dual functions not only to prevent subsequent matings but also to maintain proper sperm count for fertilization in the female reproductive tract, as a winner-take-all strategy to advance male reproduction.

Introduction

In mammals, spermatozoa generated in the testis cannot fertilize eggs until they acquire fertilizing abilities when they pass through the epididymis. Whereas spermatozoa collected from the cauda epididymis can efficiently fertilize eggs in vitro [1], male mice ejaculate spermatozoa into the female reproductive tract with accessory gland secretions (e.g. seminal vesicle, prostate, coagulating gland) in vivo. The majority of accessory gland secretions are produced from seminal vesicles in many species (e.g. human, bull) [2, 3]. As mice without seminal vesicles show subfertility [4], seminal vesicle secretions (SVSs) are thought to play a beneficial role in fertilization in vivo.

As one of the physiological functions of the SVSs, copulatory plug formation is well known in several primates (such as chimpanzees) and rodents [5, 6]. For copulatory plug formation, transglutaminase 4 (TGM4), a protein from the coagulating gland and prostate, catalyzes the formation of ϵ-(γ-glutamyl)lysine cross-bridges between some SVS proteins [6–14]. In fact, Tgm4-disrupted males show a plug formation defect [15]. Thus, the interaction between SVSs and proteins from the coagulating gland and prostate are required for copulatory plug formation. Mangels et al. showed that copulatory plugs prevent subsequent mating with other males [16], and their previous work suggested that the copulatory plug is involved with sperm release, sperm transition, and coital stimulation, but the critical role remained to be determined [17]. Further, other results showed that the attachment of SVSs to cauda epididymal spermatozoa protects spermatozoa from the immunological defense mechanism of the uterus and also prevents premature capacitation, leading to increased sperm viability and fertilizing ability in vivo [18–20]. Also, SVSs are reported to influence gene expression in the female reproductive tract and subsequent fetal development [21–23]. These results suggest that SVSs have several physiological functions, but the details remain to be elucidated.

In 1987, Chen et al. found seven major proteins in mouse SVSs (SVS1–SVS7) by India ink staining after SDS-PAGE [24]. SVS1 to 3 are substrates for the copulatory plug formation-related enzyme “TGM4” [6–14], and genes encoding SVS2 to SVS6 evolved by gene duplication and formed a cluster on chromosome 2 [25, 26], suggesting redundant functions of SVS1 to SVS6 during plug formation. However, Svs2 single knockout (−/−) males hardly make copulatory plugs, leading to male subfertility [20]. In addition, SVS4 to SVS6 are not substrates of TGM4 [9] and are expected to play distinct roles, such as in capacitation inhibition [27] and serine protease inhibition [25]. Therefore, SVS1 to SVS6 may share some roles in plug formation, but the importance of each gene remains to be determined.

The remaining SVS, SVS7, is encoded by the Pate4 (also known as Pate-B and Caltrin) gene on chromosome 9. Pate4 mRNA was reported to be expressed not only in the seminal vesicles but also in the testes, epididymides, and prostates by RT-PCR [28, 29]. However, the later study showed that Pate4 mRNA is expressed not in testis and epididymis but in the prostate and seminal vesicle by northern blotting, and that the signal intensity of Pate4 mRNA in seminal vesicles is four times higher than in the prostates by qPCR [30]. Thus, the expression of mouse Pate4 in tissues remains unclear. PATE4 was localized to the head and flagella of mouse epididymal spermatozoa incubated in SVS7 solution [31]. It was found that Ca2+-dependent events relating to sperm fertilizing ability, such as in sperm capacitation, sperm motility, the acrosome reaction, and sperm-egg interaction, were regulated by PATE4 in vitro [26, 31–33]. Heckt et al. performed phenotypic analyses of Pate4−/− mice [30], but the detailed role of PATE4 in copulatory plug formation and sperm-fertilizing ability remains to be revealed. Here, we examined the physiological function of PATE4 in male fecundity using knockout mice.

Materials and methods

Animals

All mice used in this study were purchased from Japan SLC or CLEA Japan. Mice were acclimated to a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Japan (#Biken-AP-H25-02 and #Biken-AP-H30-01).

Sample collection

The testis, epididymis (caput, corpus, and cauda regions), coagulating gland (also known as anterior prostate), prostate (mixture of dorsal, lateral, and ventral regions), seminal vesicle, ovary, and uterus were collected from adult C57BL/6NCr and B6D2F1 mice. SVSs were obtained by squeezing the seminal vesicle immediately after euthanasia. The copulatory plug was collected from ICR males treated with vasoligation within 2 h of mating. These samples were fractured in TRIzol (Ambion) or in Tris-Buffered Saline with Triton-X {50 mM NaCl (Nacalai), 10 mM Tris-HCl (Nacalai), 1% (v/v) Triton-X 114 (Sigma), pH 7.5} containing 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai), and then used to detect PATE4 in various organs at mRNA and protein levels. Cauda epididymal spermatozoa were dispersed in TYH drops [34] for 5 min. The intrauterine fluid before and 1 h after mating with B6D2F1 males was collected by PBS perfusion (200 μL/each uterine horn). These samples were used for western blotting.

RT-PCR for tissue expression analysis

The total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen). PCR conditions with primer sets {Pate4: 5′-atgaattcagtgacgaaaatcagcacactg-3′ (forward), 5′-ctagaagctattacacaagtttttttcgcagc-3′ (reverse), Actb: 5′-catccgtaaagacctctatgccaac-3′ (forward), 5′-atggagccaccgatccaca-3′ (reverse), Tgm4: 5′-aatgctgctgcccaccacacat-3′ (forward), 5′-tcaaactgaccaaaggtccagggct-3′ (reverse)} and KOD DNA Polymerase (KOD-Fx neo, TOYOBO) were 94°C for 3 min, denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 65°C for 30 s, elongation at 72°C for 30 s for 35 cycles total, followed by 72°C for 2 min.

Western blotting

Before SDS-PAGE, all samples were mixed with sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol [35] and then boiled. A rabbit polyclonal antibody was raised against mouse PATE4 (Accession #: NP_064660.2, amino acid #52 to 69). A goat polyclonal antibody for mouse TGM4 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-55787). A monoclonal antibody for SLC2A3 (KS64-10), an abundant protein in the sperm tail, was generated in our laboratory [36]. The horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG), HRP-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG, and HRP-conjugated bovine anti-goat IgG antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (also see Supplemental Table S1). The PVDF membrane was treated with Tris-Buffered Saline with Tween-20 {TBST, 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, and 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 (Nacalai), pH 7.5} containing 10% skim milk (Becton Dickinson and Company) for 1 h, followed by the primary antibody (1:1000) for 3 h or overnight. After washing, the membrane was treated with the secondary antibody [1:5000 (PATE4 and SLC2A3), 1:50,000 (TGM4)] for 1 h. The HRP activity was visualized with ECL Prime (BioRad). The signal intensity was measured by ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare).

Production of Pate4 mutant mice with International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium vector

A targeting vector for Pate4 was purchased from International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) (Project ID: #36005), and subsequently electroporated into EGR-G101 ES cells (http://cell.brc.riken.jp/en/, cell# AES0182) [37] after linearization. PCR conditions to select the correctly targeted ES cells using KOD-Fx (TOYOBO) and primers {5′ arm for Pate4: 5′-cagaggcttctctaacatagactac-3′ (forward), 5′-cacaacgggttcttctgttagtcc-3′ (reverse), 3′ arm for Pate4: 5′-atccgggggtaccgcgtcgag-3′ (forward), 5′-ctcagtcttccattgattggagcac-3′ (reverse)} were 94°C for 3 min, denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 65°C for 30 s, elongation at 72°C for 6 and 4 min (for 5′ arm and 3′ arm, respectively) for 40 cycles total, followed by 72°C for 2 min. ES cells were injected into 8-cell embryos collected from ICR females. These embryos were transplanted into the uterus of pseudo-pregnant ICR recipients. The chimeric males were mated with B6D2F1 females, and then germ-line transmission and genotyping were confirmed by PCR. PCR conditions with primer sets for genotyping {WT allele: 5′-caaaacctggtgaatcatgc-3′ (forward), 5′-cgagcacatttgctttgagt-3′ (reverse), KO allele: 5′-atccgggggtaccgcgtcgag-3′ (forward), 5′-cgagcacatttgctttgagt -3′ (reverse)} and Taq polymerase (Ex Taq, Takara) were 94°C for 1 min, denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 65°C for 30 s, elongation at 72°C for 30 s for 40 cycles total, followed by 72°C for 7 min. The Pate4 mutant mice with B6D2 congenic background were used for all experiments in this study. Frozen spermatozoa from Pate4-disrupted males (B6D2; B6-Pate4 < tm1a(KOMP)Osb>, BRC#09990) will be available through RIKEN BRC (http://en.brc.riken.jp/index.shtml).

Surgical removal of the accessory glands

B6D2F1 males (8-week-old) were used for the removal of accessory glands, as described previously [38]. Four weeks after surgeries, these males were used for the following experiments.

Count, morphology, motility, and in vitro fertilization of cauda epididymal spermatozoa

Protein extracts from the entire cauda epididymis were subjected to western blotting, and then the signal intensity of SLC2A3 was measured by ImageQuant TL software to estimate the sperm count within the cauda epididymis. Cauda epididymal spermatozoa were dispersed in PBS (for sperm morphology) or TYH drops {for sperm motility and in vitro fertilization (IVF)}. After an incubation period of 120 min, the sperm motility pattern was examined using the CEROS sperm analysis system (software version 12.3; Hamilton Thorne Biosciences) [39]. IVF was performed as described previously [40].

Male fecundity of Pate4 mutant mice

Pate4 mutant males (9- to 17-week-old) were mated with two B6D2F1 females (8- to 11-week-old) for 1.6–4.5 months (see Supplemental Table S2). Sham, coagulating gland removed {CG (−)}, and seminal vesicle removed {SV (−)} males (20- to 27-week-old) were mated with one or two B6D2F1 females (7- to 10-week-old) for 1.5 to 2.0 months (see Supplemental Table S2).

Collection of copulatory plugs and uterine sperm counts

Pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) (5 units, ASKA Pharmaceutical) was injected into the abdominal cavity of B6D2F1 females, followed by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (5 units, ASKA Pharmaceutical) 48 h after PMSG. Twelve hours after hCG, the hormone-treated females were caged with the Pate4 mutant, sham, CG (−), and SV (−) males (9- to 37-week-old) under observation. Immediately after mating, the existence of the copulatory plugs was checked, and then the leaked semen was collected with pipettes. Within 2 h of mating, the copulatory plug and the uterus were obtained after euthanasia. The spermatozoa in the uterus were collected by PBS perfusion (200 μL/each uterine horn), and then the total sperm count was examined with a hemocytometer.

Sequential mating

After 11 h of hCG injection, the hormone-treated females were caged with Pate4−/− males (9- to 15-week-old) under observation. After successful mating, the females were re-caged with Pate4+/+ males (9- to 15-week-old) under observation. After 6–9 h of mating with Pate4+/+ males, we collected eggs from the oviducts to observe two pronuclei and then incubated them for 4 days in KSOM drops. KSOM contains 95.0 mM NaCl, 2.49 mM KCl, 0.353 mM KH2PO4, 0.199 mM MgSO4 • 7H2O, 2.36 mL 60% (w/w) DL-lactic acid, 0.250 mM pyruvic acid, 0.200 mM glucose, 1.00 g/L BSA, 10.0 μM EDTA • 4Na, 25.0 mM NaHCO3, 1.71 mM CaCl2 • H2O, 10.0 mL/L essential amino acid (Gibco), 5.00 mL/L nonessential amino acid (Gibco), 50 IU/L penicillin (Gibco), 50 μg/L streptomycin (Gibco), 1.00 mM glutamine, and 1.66 mL/L 0.6% phenol red (Daiichi-Sankyo) in deionized and distilled water (unless otherwise noted, we used regents from Sigma). The genome was extracted from each egg at morula and blastocyst stage with 1 μL lysis buffer {20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM EDTA (Nacalai), 400 mM NaCl, 0.3% SDS (Nacalai), and 200 μg/mL Actinase E solution (Kaken pharmaceutical)}. PCR conditions with primer sets for genotyping and KOD-Fx neo were 94°C for 3 min, denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 65°C for 30 s, elongation at 72°C for 30 s for 40 cycles total, followed by 72°C for 2 min.

Modified AI method

We modified the conventional AI method [41, 42], by using a gel loading tip (cat#010-Q, BMBio) for sperm injection (Supplemental Figure S2A) and petroleum jelly for plugging (Nacalai) (Supplemental Figure S2B). AI was performed under Isoflurane anesthesia (Mylan Inc.). After inserting 10–15 mm of the tip (Supplemental Figure S2B), about 50 μl of a sperm suspension was injected into the uterine body. Then, petroleum jelly at the end of the tip was injected to form the artificial plug around the uterine cervix using a plunger (Terumo) (Supplemental Figure S2C).

Sperm injection by AI

The SVSs of B6D2F1 and Pate4−/− males were suspended in 200 μL TYH or PBS, and subsequently centrifuged at 2000–5000 g for 5 min, as described previously [20]. Ten microliter of the supernatant was diluted in 90 μL TYH or PBS. Cauda epididymal spermatozoa of B6D2F1 and Pate4−/− males were dispersed in 100 μL TYH or PBS drops with and without SVSs for 10–40 min. The uterus of hormone-treated females was artificially injected with 0.08 to 8.8 × 106 cauda epididymal spermatozoa.

Sperm viability

Thirty minutes after AI, the uterine fluid was collected by TYH or PBS perfusion (200 μL/each uterine horn). The motility of spermatozoa in the middle layer of the drop was recorded using an Olympus BX-53 microscope equipped with a high-speed camera (HAS-L1, Ditect). Spermatozoa that showed flagellar beating were counted.

In vivo fertilization rates

Seven to fourteen hours after AI, the cumulus of collected eggs was removed with Hyaluronidase (300 μg/mL final conc., Sigma). The number of eggs with two pronuclei was counted.

Pregnancy rates and fetal development

After 19 days, offsprings were obtained by natural birth or Caesarean section.

Statistical analyses

All values are shown as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-test (for Figures 2E and F, and 5B), Mann–Whitney U-test (for Figures 2E, and 5A and D), Steel-Dwass test (for Figures 3B, E, and F, and 4C and D), and Tukey–Kramer method (for Figures 3A, C and D, and 5E), after examining the normal distribution and variance.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Characteristics of seminal vesicles, prostates, and cauda epididymal spermatozoa in Pate4−/− males. (A) Detection of SVS1 to SVS6 and PATE4 in SVSs by Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB). (B) Detection of transglutaminase 4 (Tgm4) by RT-PCR. (C) Detection of TGM4 by WB. The membrane was stained by CBB (lower panel). (D) Sperm morphology. Scale bars show 100 μm. (E) Sperm motility assay using computer-assisted sperm analysis. After 2 h of incubation, there were no differences in the sperm parameters between Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− spermatozoa. VAP: average path velocity (P = 0.79), VSL: straight line velocity (P = 1.00), VCL: curvilinear velocity (P = 0.81), ALH: amplitude of lateral head (P = 0.56), BCF: beat cross frequency (P = 0.86), STR: straightness of trajectory (P = 0.77), LIN: linearity (P = 0.77). (F) In vitro fertilization rates. The fertilizing ability of Pate4−/− spermatozoa was comparable to Pate4+/+ spermatozoa (P = 0.79). N.S.: not significant.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

In vivo fertilizing ability of Pate4−/− spermatozoa and the effect of Pate4−/− SVSs on fertilization rates using AI. (A) Fertilization rates by artificially injecting cauda epididymal spermatozoa. The yellow-colored region shows the sperm count in the uterus of Pate4−/− males (see Figure 3E). There are no difference in the fertilizing ability between Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− spermatozoa (<106 spermatozoa: P = 0.67, ≥106 spermatozoa: P = 0.55). (B to D) Effect of Pate4+/+ SVSs on AI. The sperm motile rates (B, P = 0.69), pregnancy rates (C), and litter size (D, P = 0.30) were examined. (E) Effect of Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− SVSs on the fertilization rates. Though SVSs have a positive effect on fertilization rates, there was no difference between AI with Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− SVSs. *P < 0.05, N.S.: not significant.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Male fecundity of Pate4−/− and SV (−) mice and sperm counts in the uterus. (A and B) No. of litters/female/month of caging. Sham-operated males were used as the control (also see the Supplemental Table S2). CG (−): coagulating gland removal, SV (−): seminal vesicle removal. (C and D) Litter size. Also, see the Supplemental Table S2. (E and F) Ejaculated sperm counts within the uterus. Marks in the inserted figures (□ and ▵) show the sperm count (×106) collected from each female mated with Pate4−/− and SV (−) males. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Copulatory plugs and semen leakage of Pate4−/− and SV (−) males, and sequential mating. (A and B) Morphology of the copulatory plugs. Yellow arrows show the copulatory plugs of Pate4−/− and SV (−) males. The spermatozoa were observed in the uterus of a female mated with these males. Scale bars indicate 5 mm. (C and D) Weight of the copulatory plugs. The copulatory plugs were collected from WT females mated with Pate4 mutant males (9- to 19-week-old) and surgically treated males (15- to 26-week-old). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (E) Observation of the vaginal opening before and immediately after mating. The ejaculated leakage was observed in females mated with Pate4−/− and SV (−) males. (F) The leakage contained spermatozoa. Scale bars represent 50 μm. (G) Fertilization rates obtained by sequential mating. After 0.5–3.5 h of mating with Pate4−/− males, the females were sequentially mated with Pate4+/+ males.

Alignment analysis

The amino acid sequences for SVS1 (accession #AAI25636), SVS2 (accession#: AAI07276), SVS3 (accession#: AAI31999), and PATE4 (accession#: AAI20767) were used for alignment analysis with Clustal omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). The presence and location of the signal peptide were predicted with SignalP 4.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/).

Results

Detection of PATE4

When we performed RT-PCR with cDNAs of male and female reproductive organs, Pate4 was strongly detected in the seminal vesicle (Figure 1A). Further, we generated an anti-PATE4 antibody and performed western blotting analysis. While we could not detect any signals in the testis, cauda epididymis, coagulating gland, and prostate, a firm doublet signal was detected in seminal vesicles (Figure 1B). To examine whether PATE4 is ejaculated into semen, we collected uterine fluid 1 h after copulation. Though we could not detect PATE4 in the uterus fluid before coitus, PATE4 was detected after coitus in uterine fluid which also contained semen and the copulatory plug (Figure 1C). These results indicate that PATE4 is abundantly secreted from seminal vesicles and then ejaculated into the female reproductive tract.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Detection of PATE4 and production of Pate4 mutant mice. (A) Expression analysis of Pate4 mRNA by PCR. Actin beta (Actb) was used as the control. CG: coagulating gland, SV: seminal vesicle. (B and C) Detection of PATE4 by western blotting (WB). SVSs: seminal vesicle secretions. (D) Targeting strategy to produce Pate4 mutant mice. Black arrows show the primer set used for genotyping. Yellow and red triangles show loxP and FRT sites, respectively. neo: neomycin resistance cassette. (E) Genotyping of Pate4 mutants by PCR. (F) Detection of PATE4 in the seminal vesicle of Pate4 mutants by WB.

Male fecundity of Pate4−/− mice

To reveal the function of PATE4 in vivo, we generated mice lacking Pate4 with a targeting vector from IMPC (Figure 1D). Mice were genotyped by genomic PCR (Figure 1E). The breeding pairs of Pate4 heterozygotes resulted in the predicted Mendelian ratio in offspring {n = 9, wild type (+/+): heterozygous (+/−):−/− = 22 pups (30.1%): 31 pups (42.5%): 20 pups (27.4%)}, and Pate4−/− mice grew normally to sexual maturity. As expected from RT-PCR analysis (Figure 1A), Pate4−/− females are fertile (n = 5, No. of litters/female/month of caging: 1.16 ± 0.20). While there were no differences in the morphology (Supplemental Figure S1A) and weight (Supplemental Figure S1B) of seminal vesicles, PATE4 protein was not detectable from the seminal vesicles of Pate4−/− mice (Figure 1F). SVS1 to SVS6 and TGM4 were detected in wild-type (WT) and Pate4−/− males at comparable levels (Figure 2A–C). As we expected from the western blot analysis, Pate4−/− cauda epididymal spermatozoa did not show any defects in sperm parameters in vitro such as morphology (Figure 2D), motility parameters (Figure 2E), and in vitro fertilizing ability (Figure 2F).

To characterize the sperm fertilizing ability in vivo, we caged B6D2F1 females with Pate4 mutant males for 1–5 months. Pate4−/− males mated normally, but the pregnancy rate was significantly reduced, compared with Pate4+/+ and Pate4+/− males (no. of litters/female/month of caging, Pate4+/+: 1.70 ± 0.18, Pate4+/−: 1.13 ± 0.30, Pate4−/− : 0.37 ± 0.34) (Figure 3A; Supplemental Table S2). It should be noted that the average litter size was lower with Pate4−/− males {Pate4+/+: 9.69 ± 1.70, Pate4+/−: 9.95 ± 2.17, Pate4−/−: 6.07 ± 3.95 (Figure 3C, and Supplemental Table S2)}.

To further characterize male fecundity, we collected uterine spermatozoa 2 h after mating. While the total sperm count stored in the cauda epididymis of Pate4−/− males was comparable (Pate4+/+: 3.00 ± 1.85 × 107 spermatozoa, Pate4+/−: 2.63 ± 4.00 × 107 spermatozoa, Pate4−/−: 2.38 ± 5.33 × 107 spermatozoa), the number of ejaculated spermatozoa collected from the uterus was significantly reduced when compared with the control males {Pate4+/+: 9.61 ± 5.07 × 106 spermatozoa, Pate4+/−: 7.04 ± 5.32 × 106 spermatozoa (Supplemental Movie S1), Pate4−/−: 0.17 ± 0.27 × 106 spermatozoa (Supplemental Movie S2)} (Figure 3E). These results indicate that PATE4 plays a role in male fecundity.

Phenotypic analysis of Pate4−/− males

When we observed copulatory plug formation every 30 min during the mating experiment, we found that Pate4−/− males produce significantly smaller plugs compared with Pate4+/+ and Pate4+/− males (Pate4+/+: 50.48 ± 7.31 mg, Pate4+/−: 40.55 ± 13.60 mg, Pate4−/−: 2.37 ± 4.61 mg) (Figure 4A and C). It should be noted that there was no difference in the amount of copulatory plug-related proteins SVS1 to SVS3 and TGM4 [6–15, 20], between WT and Pate4−/− males (Figure 2A and C). These results indicate that PATE4 is critical for copulatory plug formation.

To understand the effect of the decreased copulatory plug size, we observed the vaginal opening immediately after copulation. We found that the semen leaked out of females mated with Pate4−/− males (Figure 4E and F). With the finding that fewer spermatozoa were found in females mated with Pate4−/− males (Figure 3E), these results indicate that the copulatory plug has a role in keeping ejaculated spermatozoa in the uterus.

Fecundity and phenotypical analysis of coagulating gland- and seminal vesicle- removed males

Some SVS proteins are required for the copulatory plug formation and sperm fertilizing ability [6–14, 20, 27, 38, 43]. We examined whether the lack of multiple factors including PATE4 from the seminal vesicles led to a more severe decrease in male fecundity using males with their seminal vesicle surgically removed {SV (−)} (Supplemental Figure S1C). We used the sham-operated and coagulating gland-removed {CG (−)} males as the control for plug formation. The fecundity of CG (−) males was comparable to the sham-operated males, but the pregnancy rate of females caged with SV (−) males was reduced {no. of litters/female/month of caging, Sham: 1.39 ± 0.27, CG (−): 1.53 ± 0.00, SV (−): 0.57 ± 0.45} (Figure 3B; Supplemental Table S2). Further, the average litter size largely varied between SV (−) males {Sham: 8.83 ± 1.99, CG (−): 9.13 ± 2.39, SV (−): 6.10 ± 3.67 (Figure 3D; Supplemental Table S2)}. The sperm count in the cauda epididymis of SV (−) males was normal {Sham: 1.83 ± 0.12 × 107 spermatozoa, CG (−): 1.40 ± 0.27 × 107 spermatozoa, SV (−): 1.54 ± 0.07 × 107 spermatozoa}, but the ejaculated sperm count observed in the uterus after mating with SV(−) males was much lower than the sham-operated and CG (−) males {Sham: 5.45 ± 5.89 × 106 spermatozoa (Supplemental Movie S3), CG (−): 5.38 ± 5.23 × 106 spermatozoa (Supplemental Movie S4), SV (−): 0.13 ± 0.17 × 106 spermatozoa (Supplemental Movie S5)} (Figure 3F). As we expected from the function of seminal vesicles, SV (−) males hardly make a copulatory plug {Sham: 43.52 ± 13.80 mg, SV (−): 3.53 ± 3.59 mg} (Figure 4B and D), leading to semen leakage (Figure 4E and F). The copulatory plug of CG (−) males was half of the sham-operated males {Sham: 43.52 ± 13.80 mg, CG (−): 21.55 ± 11.19 mg} (Figure 4B and D), but we could not observe semen leakage. Thus, as the phenotype of Pate4−/− males is similar to that of SV (−) males, PATE4 functions as the major factor in seminal vesicle secretions.

Sequential mating with Pate4−/− males

When females were re-caged with Pate4+/+ males immediately after mating with Pate4−/− males, these females succeeded in subsequent mating. Thus, we examined which spermatozoa were fertilizing eggs. As shown in Figure 4G, within the 2-h mating interval, almost all fertilized eggs were from Pate4+/+ spermatozoa (n = 4, fertilization rate, Pate4+/+: 98.8 ± 2.4%, Pate4−/−: 1.2 ± 2.4%). Further, even in intervals greater 2 h, the fertilization rates of Pate4+/+ spermatozoa were higher than the Pate4−/− spermatozoa (n = 4, fertilization rates, Pate4+/+: 72.6 ± 37.7%, Pate4−/−: 27.4 ± 37.7%). These results indicate that the copulatory plug inhibits subsequent mating, and has a critical function in the male reproductive strategy.

In vivo fertilizing ability of Pate4−/− spermatozoa

To examine the fertilizing ability of Pate4−/− spermatozoa in vivo, we collected the cauda epididymal spermatozoa, injected them into the uterus, and sealed the uterine cervix with petroleum jelly {artificial insemination (AI), Supplemental Figure S2A–C}. We consistently obtained high fertilization rates when we used 1 × 106 or more spermatozoa in the insemination fluid {Pate4+/+: 98.56 ± 2.70% (197/202 eggs), Pate4−/−: 91.91 ± 13.33% (252/276 eggs)} (Figure 5A). However, when we injected less than 1 × 106 spermatozoa, the fertilization rates largely varied {Pate4+/+: 49.77 ± 33.73% (123/247 eggs), Pate4−/−: 41.60 ± 40.40% (97/262 eggs), Figure 5A}. There were no significant differences in the fertilizing ability between Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− cauda epididymal spermatozoa. Thus, Pate4−/− spermatozoa have comparable fertilizing ability with WT spermatozoa in vivo.

Effect of preincubating sperm in PATE4 on AI

To examine the effect of SVSs on sperm fertilizing abilities in vivo, we incubated cauda epididymal spermatozoa in TYH medium with or without SV solutions prior to AI. When we collected spermatozoa 30 min after AI, there were no differences in sperm motility {with Pate4+/+ SVSs (1408 spermatozoa, n = 10): 44.86 ± 17.78%, without Pate4+/+ SVSs (2605 spermatozoa, n = 9): 41.51 ± 17.68%, Figure 5B}. In addition, there were no differences in pregnancy rates {with Pate4+/+ SVSs (n = 13): 53.85%, without Pate4+/+ SVSs (n = 13): 61.54%; Figure 5C} and litter size (with Pate4+/+ SVSs: 9.00 ± 5.07, without Pate4+/+ SVSs: 11.88 ± 6.66; Figure 5D; Supplemental Figure S2D). It is noteworthy that both Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− SVSs improved the fertilization rates using 0.8 to 1.8 × 105 spermatozoa {with Pate4+/+ SVSs: 71.72 ± 29.26% (131/203 eggs), with Pate4−/− SVSs: 79.56 ± 19.76% (95/119 eggs), without Pate4+/+ SVSs: 37.97 ± 11.51% (31/99 eggs); Figure 5E}, implicating SVSs might have a positive role when sperm number is low in vivo, but that PATE4 is not the key molecule.

Discussion

The expression of mouse Pate4 in tissues remained to be clarified, but here we demonstrated PATE4 abundantly presents in the seminal vesicles at mRNA and protein levels (Figure 1A and B). It is known that Pate4 is a member of the Pate family composed of 13 genes clustered on mouse chromosome 9 [28]. As some parts of the nucleotide sequence of Pate4 are similar to the other Pate family genes, nonspecific binding of primers might cause the discrepancy of RT-PCR results between this study and previous papers.

As we had generated Pate4−/− mice before the report of Heckt et al. [30], we used our KO mice for this study. We used the same Pate4 targeting vector construct from KOMP as the previous report [30], but the genetic background used to maintain the mouse line was different between this study (B6D2 background) and the previous paper (B6J background). The previous paper indicated that fecundity of Pate4−/− males were comparable to the control males [30], but we revealed that Pate4−/− males were subfertile (Figure 3A and C). When we used seven males of Pate4−/− mice for the mating test, the male fecundity varied by individuals (see Supplemental Table S2, no. of litters/female/caging of month, 0–0.96). Thus, the individual differences of Pate4−/− males may cause the difference in male fecundity between our study and the previous report. And, our result suggests that the subfertile phenotype may be easily masked by genetic background.

PATE4 was absent from the seminal vesicles of Pate4−/− mice (Figure 1F), but the copulatory plug related proteins “SVS1 to SVS3” were detected in Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− seminal vesicles at comparable level (Figure 2A). The sequence homology among PATE4, SVS1, SVS2, and SVS3 is low at the amino acid level (Supplemental Figure S3; PATE4 vs SVS1: 23.9%, PATE4 vs SVS2: 23.5%, PATE4 vs SVS3: 17.7%). These results suggest that the remaining factors for plug formation in Pate4−/− males cannot compensate for the lack of PATE4. To form the copulatory plug, it is known that TGM (e.g. TGM4) catalyzes the formation of ϵ-(γ-glutamyl)lysine which cross-bridges among SVS1 to SVS3 [6–14]. Lin et al. showed that the peptide sequence “QXK(S/T)” in SVS3 acts as the transglutaminase cross-linking sites by the reaction of guinea pig liver transglutaminase and recombinant polypeptides from SVS3 (Supplemental Figure S3C) [10]. We also found this peptide sequence in SVS2, but the sequence is not conserved in PATE4 (Supplemental Figure S3B). SVS1 also does not contain the sequence “QXK(S/T)”, but Tseng et al. showed that two glutamine residues in SVS1 were the major site for TGM4 crosslinking by mass spectrometry (Supplemental Figure S3A) [8]. As PATE4 also has four glutamine and ten lysine residues (Supplemental Figure S3), our results suggest that PATE4 may have an unidentified target sequence for TGM4 or a function to promote plug formation independent from TGM4.

It is well known that proteins secreted from coagulating glands are required for plug formation [15, 17]. The plug weight from CG (−) males was reduced to almost half of the sham-operated males (Figure 4B and D), but CG (−) males were fertile (Figure 3B), as previously reported [4]. Tgm4 mRNA was detected in the seminal vesicle, coagulating gland, and prostate (Figure 2B), corresponding with the Unigene database and a previous study [44]. Further, we revealed that the TGM4 protein was detected in the prostate and coagulating gland (Figure 2C). These results indicate that TGM4 localized in both the coagulating gland and the prostate contribute to copulatory plug formation.

Detailed functions of SVSs on sperm-fertilizing ability and fetal development remain to be known. Kawano et al. showed that SVSs improved sperm viability and increased the fertilization rate in vivo [20]. However, with sperm counts comparable to that observed in normal matings (1 × 106 or more), we could not find a significant difference in the rates of sperm motility between spermatozoa with and without SVSs (Figure 5B). Also, 2 h after mating with SV (−) males, the ejaculated spermatozoa in the uterus survived (Supplemental Movie S5). Further, SVSs did not increase the pregnancy rates nor litter size (Figure 5C and D). Given the data presented, SVSs do not appear to play an essential role in sperm-fertilizing ability, implantation, or fetal development in mice.

When we lowered the sperm count in AI, WT SVSs improved fertilization rates, implicating a positive function of WT SVSs on sperm function in vivo. Even in such a case, PATE4 does not contribute to increased sperm-fertilizing ability (Figure 5E). Our results suggest that other components secreted from seminal vesicles support sperm-fertilizing ability in vivo but only when sperm count is low. Many researchers have analyzed the sperm-fertilizing ability using AI, but the fertilization rates varied among papers [20, 41, 42, 45], indicating that an AI method has yet to be standardized. We used females after 12 h of hCG injection for AI, and then obtained the high fertilization rates, corresponding with the previous papers [42]. Thus, for AI with hormone-treated females, the timing after 12 h of hCG injection is considered as the best. Previous studies showed that sperm parameters, such as the morphology, sperm motility, and fertility rate, varied between genetic backgrounds of mouse strains [46, 47]. Thus, the difference between the previous report and this study may be due to these problems.

Here, we revealed that PATE4 is an essential factor for copulatory plug formation. Through phenotypic analysis of Pate4−/− males, we found that the copulatory plug has a physiological function to keep the spermatozoa in the uterus, leading to an increase in fertilization rates. Further, females mated with Pate4−/− males became pregnant from subsequent matings with Pate4+/+ males due to the plug formation defect. Thus, the copulatory plug has dual functions not only to prevent subsequent matings but also to maintain proper sperm count for fertilization in the female reproductive tract, as a winner-take-all strategy to advance male reproduction.

Supplementary data

Supplemental Figure S1. Morphology and weight of Pate4−/− seminal vesicles, and the production of the male accessory gland-removed mice. (A) Morphology of seminal vesicles. Scale bars show 5 mm. (B) Seminal vesicle (SV) weight/body weight (BW). There was no difference between Pate4+/+ and Pate4−/− SVs (P = 0.78). N.S.: not significant. (C) Accessory glands were surgically removed, as described previously [38]. CG: coagulating gland.

Supplemental Figure S2. Modification of AI and pups produced by AI. (A) Pipette tip for AI. Scale bar shows 5 mm. (B and C) Procedure of AI. Ten to fifteen millimeter of a tip containing the sperm suspension (50 μL) and petroleum jelly for plugging were inserted into the uterus of female mice (B). By inserting 4–5 mm of a plunger into the tip, the sperm suspension was injected into the uterus, and the petroleum jelly formed an artificial plug around the uterine cervix (C). (D) Pups produced from AI. There were no difference in the pregnancy rates and litter size between AI with and without SVSs (also see Figure 5C and D).

Supplemental Figure S3. Alignment analysis between PATE4, SVS1, SVS2, and SVS3. (A) Comparison between PATE4 and SVS1. (B) Comparison between PATE4 and SVS1. (C) Comparison between PATE4 and SVS1.

Blue-colored letters: signal peptide; red boxes: potential target sites for TGM4; gray-highlighted regions: fully conserved residue.

Supplemental Movies 1 and 2. Observation of Pate4 mutant mouse spermatozoa in the uterus. Pate4+/− (Supplemental Movie S1) and Pate4−/− (Supplemental Movie S2) spermatozoa were collected from the uterus by PBS perfusion.

Supplemental Movies 3–5. Observation of spermatozoa within the uterus after mating with surgically treated males. Spermatozoa of Sham (Supplemental Movie S3), CG (−) (Supplemental Movie S4), and SV (−) (Supplemental Movie S5) males were collected from the uterus by PBS perfusion.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Files

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms Ferheen Abbasi and Dr Julio Castaneda for critical reading of the manuscript.

Notes

Edited by Dr. Monika A. Ward

Footnotes

Grant Support: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grants (JP18K14612 to T.N., JP15H05573 to Y.F., JP17J09669 to T.M., JP17H01394, and JP25112007 to M.I.), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) grant (JP18gm5010001), Takeda Science Foundation grants to Y.F., and M.I., the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD087157 and R01HD088412), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grand Challenges Explorations grant OPP1160866).

Author contributions

T.N. and M.I. designed the research; T.N., Y.F., T.M., S.O., and S.K. performed the research; T.N., Y.F., T.M., and S.O. analyzed the data, and T.N. and M.I. wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1. Yanagimachi R. Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994: 189–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Setchell BP, Brooks DE. Anatomy, vasculature, innervation, and fluids of the male reproductive tract. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1988: 753–836. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Risbridger GP, Taylor RA. Physiology of the male accessory sex structures: the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, and bulbourethral glands. In: Neill JD. (ed.), Knobil and Neill's Physiology of Reproduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006: 1149–1172. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pang SF, Chow PH, Wong TM. The role of the seminal vesicles, coagulating glands and prostate glands on the fertility and fecundity of mice. Reproduction 1979; 56:129–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tinklepaugh OL. Occurrence of vaginal plug in a chimpanzee. Anat Rec 1930; 46:329–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Seitz J, Aumuller G. Biochemical properties of secretory proteins from rat seminal vesicles. Andrologia 1990; 22(Suppl 1):25–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tseng HC, Tang JB, Gandhi PS, Luo CW, Ou CM, Tseng CJ, Lin HJ, Chen YH. Mutual adaptation between mouse transglutaminase 4 and its native substrates in the formation of copulatory plug. Amino Acids 2012; 42:951–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tseng HC, Lin HJ, Tang JB, Gandhi PS, Chang WC, Chen YH. Identification of the major TG4 cross-linking sites in the androgen-dependent SVS I exclusively expressed in mouse seminal vesicle. J Cell Biochem 2009; 107:899–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tseng HC, Lin HJ, Sudhakar Gandhi PS, Wang CY, Chen YH. Purification and identification of transglutaminase from mouse coagulating gland and its cross-linking activity among seminal vesicle secretion proteins. J Chromatogr B 2008; 876:198–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lin HJ, Luo CW, Chen YH. Localization of the transglutaminase cross-linking site in SVS III, a novel glycoprotein secreted from mouse seminal vesicle. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:3632–3639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Williams-Ashman HG. Transglutaminases and the clotting of mammalian seminal fluids. Mol Cell Biochem 1984; 58:51–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Folk JE. Transglutaminases. Annu Rev Biochem 1980; 49:517–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hart RG. Cowper's gland secretion in rat semen coagulation. I. Isolation and amino acid analysis of the seminal vesicle substrate. Biol Reprod 1970; 3:347–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lundwall A, Peter A, Lovgren J, Lilja H, Malm J. Chemical characterization of the predominant proteins secreted by mouse seminal vesicles. Eur J Biochem 1997; 249:39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dean MD. Genetic disruption of the copulatory plug in mice leads to severely reduced fertility. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mangels R, Young B, Keeble S, Ardekani R, Meslin C, Ferreira Z, Clark NL, Good JM, Dean MD. Copulatory plugs inhibit the reproductive success of rival males. J Evol Biol 2016; 29:2289–2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Schneider MR, Mangels R, Dean. The molecular basis and reproductive function(s) of copulatory plugs. Mol Reprod Dev 2016; 83:755–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Chang MC. A detrimental effect of seminal plasma on the fertilizing capacity of sperm. Nature 1957; 179:258–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bedford JM, Chang MC. Removal of decapacitation factor from seminal plasma by high-speed centrifugation. Am J Physiol 1962; 202:179–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kawano N, Araki N, Yoshida K, Hibino T, Ohnami N, Makino M, Kanai S, Hasuwa H, Yoshida M, Miyado K, Umezawa A. Seminal vesicle protein SVS2 is required for sperm survival in the uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111:4145–4150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Robertson SA. Seminal plasma and male factor signalling in the female reproductive tract. Cell Tissue Res 2005; 322:43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sharkey DJ, Tremellen KP, Jasper MJ, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Robertson SA. Seminal fluid induces leukocyte recruitment and cytokine and chemokine mRNA expression in the human cervix after coitus. J Immunol 2012; 188:2445–2454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bromfield JJ, Schjenken JE, Chin PY, Care AS, Jasper MJ, Robertson SA. Maternal tract factors contribute to paternal seminal fluid impact on metabolic phenotype in offspring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111:2200–2205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chen YH, Pentecost BT, McLachlan JA, Teng CT. The androgen-dependent mouse seminal vesicle secretory protein IV: characterization and complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning. Mol Endocrinol 1987; 1:707–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Clauss A, Lilja H, Lundwall A. The evolution of a genetic locus encoding small serine proteinase inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 333:383–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Karn RC, Clark NL, Nguyen ED, Swanson WJ. Adaptive evolution in rodent seminal vesicle secretion proteins. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25:2301–2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Araki N, Kawano N, Kang W, Miyado K, Yoshida K, Yoshida M. Seminal vesicle proteins SVS3 and SVS4 facilitate SVS2 effect on sperm capacitation. Reproduction 2016; 152:313–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Levitin F, Weiss M, Hahn Y, Stern O, Papke RL, Matusik R, Nandana SR, Ziv R, Pichinuk E, Salame S, Bera T, Vincent J et al.. PATE gene clusters code for multiple, secreted TFP/Ly-6/uPAR proteins that are expressed in reproductive and neuron-rich tissues and possess neuromodulatory activity. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:16928–16939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Turunen HT, Sipila P, Pujianto DA, Damdimopoulos AE, Bjorkgren I, Huhtaniemi I, Poutanen M. Members of the murine Pate family are predominantly expressed in the epididymis in a segment-specific fashion and regulated by androgens and other testicular factors. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011; 9:128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Heckt T, Keller J, Reusch R, Hartmann K, Krasemann S, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, Amling M, Schinke T. No obvious phenotypic abnormalities in mice lacking the Pate4 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016; 469:1069–1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Luo CW, Lin HJ, Chen YH. A novel heat-labile phospholipid-binding protein, SVS VII, in mouse seminal vesicle as a sperm motility enhancer. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:6913–6921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Coronel CE, Winnica DE, Novella ML, Lardy HA. Purification, structure, and characterization of caltrin proteins from seminal vesicle of the rat and mouse. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:20909–20915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dematteis A, Miranda SD, Novella ML, Maldonado C, Ponce RH, Maldera JA, Cuasnicu PS, Coronel CE. Rat Caltrin protein modulates the acrosomal exocytosis during sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod 2008; 79:493–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Toyoda Y, Yokoyama M, Hoshi T. Studies on the fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. Jpn J Anim Reprod 1971; 16:152–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Noda T, Shidara O, Harayama H. Detection of the activator cAMP responsive element modulator (CREM) isoform ortholog proteins in porcine spermatids and sperm. Theriogenology 2012; 77:1360–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Fujihara Y, Tokuhiro K, Muro Y, Kondoh G, Araki Y, Ikawa M, Okabe M. Expression of TEX101, regulated by ACE, is essential for the production of fertile mouse spermatozoa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110:8111–8116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Fujihara Y, Kaseda K, Inoue N, Ikawa M, Okabe M. Production of mouse pups from germline transmission-failed knockout chimeras. Transgenic Res 2013; 22:195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Peitz B, Olds-Clarke P. Effects of seminal vesicle removal on fertility and uterine sperm motility in the house mouse. Biol Reprod 1986; 35:608–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Goodson SG, Zhang Z, Tsuruta JK, Wang W, O’Brien DA. Classification of mouse sperm motility patterns using an automated multiclass support vector machines model. Biol Reprod 2011; 84:1207–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Tokuhiro K, Ikawa M, Benham AM, Okabe M. Protein disulfide isomerase homolog PDILT is required for quality control of sperm membrane protein ADAM3 and male fertility [corrected]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:3850–3855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Leckie PA, Watson JG, Chaykin S. An improved method for the artificial insemination of the mouse (Mus musculus). Biol Reprod 1973; 9:420–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Watson JG, Wright RW Jr, Chaykin S. Collection and transfer of preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 1977; 17:453–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kawano N, Yoshida M. Semen-coagulating protein, SVS2, in mouse seminal plasma controls sperm fertility. Biol Reprod 2007; 76:353–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Joesting MS, Cheever TR, Volzing KG, Yamaguchi TP, Wolf V, Naf D, Rubin J S, Marker PC. Secreted frizzled related protein 1 is a paracrine modulator of epithelial branching morphogenesis, proliferation, and secretory gene expression in the prostate. Dev Biol 2008; 317:161–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Stone BJ, Steele KH, Fath-Goodin A. A rapid and effective nonsurgical artificial insemination protocol using the NSET device for sperm transfer in mice without anesthesia. Transgenic Res 2015; 24:775–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sztein JM, Farley JS, Mobraaten LE. In vitro fertilization with cryopreserved inbred mouse sperm. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1774–1780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mashiko D, Ikawa M, Fujimoto K. Mouse spermatozoa with higher fertilization rates have thinner nuclei. Peer J 2017; 5:e3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Files

Articles from Biology of Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES