Abstract
Central venous catheter placement with ultrasound guidance improves the success rate and reduces the number of puncture attempts and complications. Y-shape visualization of central veins using an endocavity micro-convex ultrasound probe is a new technique, which has been used for brachiocephalic vein cannulation. Since the jugular, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins can be visualized in a single view using the Y-shape technique, it can also be used to confirm the correct placement of the catheter or guidewire. We aimed to present a case in which the location of the guidewire was verified by Y-shape visualization with an endocavity micro-convex probe after a cannulation attempt. Successful internal jugular vein catheterization was achieved with the assistance of the Y-shape imaging technique and the patient was avoided from multiple cannulation attempts.
Keywords: central venous catheter, endocavity micro-convex probe, ultrasound, y-shape visualization
Introduction
Central venous catheterization (CVC) is an invasive procedure performed perioperatively in emergency departments and critical care units due to various indications [1]. However, it can cause serious mechanical complications with an incidence of up to 12% [2]. Among these complications, carotid placement of the catheter may lead to serious problems, including excessive bleeding or local hematoma. Ultrasound (US)-guided CVC has become the standard for central venous access [3]. In the US-guided CVC technique, linear probes have been accepted as the classic approach and widely used, with the advantage of high resolution.
The use of an endocavity micro-convex probe for internal jugular vein catheterization was first proposed by Phelan et al. [4]. Endocavity micro-convex probes provide sufficient resolution for both superficial tissues, such as the internal jugular vein (IJV), and deep tissues, such as the brachiocephalic vein, with a higher tissue penetration. With this technique, the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein (SV), and brachiocephalic vein (BV) can be visualized together as a Y-shape [4-5]. The guidewire can be advanced within the brachiocephalic vein by real-time visualization and the catheter position in the BV can be visualized as well [6-7].
We present a case of internal jugular vein cannulation where a guidewire was placed using a short-axis US-guided technique and the location of the guidewire in the brachiocephalic vein was verified by Y-shape visualization, which was not possible to visualize with a linear probe. Our aim is to emphasize the usefulness of Y-shape visualization using an endocavity micro-convex probe for the confirmation of guidewire placement in the brachiocephalic vein.
Case presentation
A 58-year-old obese female patient with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a 32.7 kg/m2 body mass index (BMI) was admitted to the operating room. The patient was planned to undergo gastric bypass surgery. After standard monitoring (electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry) and arterial line placement, the induction of general anesthesia was achieved using 2 mg/kg propofol, 2 µg/kg fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium intravenously. In our clinic, central venous catheters are routinely placed to the IJV for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Thus, we planned to place a central venous catheter in the right IJV under ultrasound guidance with a short axis (out-of-plane) technique using a linear US probe. In one attempt, we accessed the jugular vein and placed the guidewire, however, the aspirated blood color appeared bright red, which made us suspicious of a carotid artery cannulation. We checked with the linear probe to verify the location of the guidewire in the IJV. With a linear probe view, there was an image showing that the guidewire was placed in the carotid artery (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Image of the carotid artery and internal jugular vein obtained by the linear probe.
The guidewire (arrows) seems to puncture and is located in the carotid artery ( IJV: internal jugular vein, CA: carotid artery).
This image could be just a reverberation artifact of the guidewire extending into the artery and not actually the wire itself. We could not verify the placement of the guidewire in the jugular vein with manipulation under US visualization. For this reason, we thought that the guidewire should also be checked with an endocavity micro-convex probe before the dilatation of the vessel. We visualized the right brachiocephalic vein using an endocavity micro-convex probe by placing it in the triangular area, which is called the omoclavicular acoustic window (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Photograph of the omoclavicular acoustic window in a volunteer.
a: clavicular head of sternocleidomastoid muscle, b: superior border of clavicula, c: inferior belly of omohyoid muscle
The omoclavicular acoustic window is described as the triangular fossa bordered by the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle medially, the clavicle inferiorly, and the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle posteriorly. We used a 5-8 MHz micro-convex endocavity probe (Mindray® Bio-Medical Electronics Co Ltd., Shenzhen, China) with an optimal imaging depth, which was set at 8 cm. With this method, a Y-shape is visualized, representing the jugular, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins in the coronal plane (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Y-Shape visualization of the three major veins.
IJV: internal jugular vein, BV: brachiocephalic vein, SV: subclavian vein
Another method to visualize the brachiocephalic vein with an endocavity micro-convex probe is placing it on the supraclavicular fossa in the coronal plane at about 30-45 degrees from the neck (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Photograph of the supraclavicular fossa in a volunteer.
Placement of the endocavity micro-convex US probe on the supraclavicular fossa for visualization of the jugular, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins as a Y-shape
The US probe can be slid anteriorly with the application of a slight alignment maneuver. The tilting maneuver could be applied as well to facilitate the visualization of the Y-shape of the veins. In our case, we successfully visualized the IJV, SV, and right BV forming a Y-shape (Figure 3) and confirmed that the guidewire was in the BV (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Image of the guidewire in the brachiocephalic vein obtained by the micro-convex endocavity probe in our case.
The arrows show the guidewire in the brachiocephalic vein.
Then, we placed a triple-lumen 7 French central venous catheter (Arrow-Howes; Arrow International, Reading, PA, US) over the guidewire and fixed it in the proper position.
Discussion
In this case, we successfully confirmed the placement of the guidewire in the brachiocephalic vein by using an endocavity micro-convex probe after a cannulation attempt to the jugular vein. The main advantage of the endocavitary micro-convex probe is the easy visualization of the brachiocephalic vein.
In general, linear probes have been used as the classical method in IJV catheterization [8]. Linear probes are often able to visualize the vasculature close to the skin surface due to their high resolution. However, Kim et al. noted a higher tissue penetration depth is possible when an endocavity micro-convex probe is used compared to a linear probe [9]. The advantage of using the endocavity micro-convex probe is that it can display structures deeper than 8 cm. Additionally, these probes also allow a wider field of view as Weber et al. reported [10]. Mallin et al. found the endocavitary micro-convex probe to be more advantageous because of its small footprint when placed on the supraclavicular fossa, which allows the performer a wider area for needle insertion and manipulations [11]. Using the supraclavicular fossa, a long axis image of the subclavian vein is obtained and its binding to the internal jugular vein and forming the brachiocephalic vein are observed. We preferred to visualize the BV through the omoclavicular acoustic window in our case, as we could obtain a clear image using this method.
Catheter malpositions and anatomic malformations can also be recognized by using an endocavity micro-convex probe that may not be visualized with a linear probe. Park et al. mentioned persistent left superior vena cava catheterization, which was diagnosed by chest radiography and could not be noticed by a linear US probe [12]. Habib et al. reported seven cases of catheter malpositions after ultrasound-guided catheterizations using a linear probe, which were also diagnosed by radiography [13]. The use of an endocavity micro-convex probe allows satisfactory images of the jugular, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins so that the malpositions mentioned above may be diagnosed during the procedure.
Conclusions
We confirmed the correct placement of the guidewire in the brachiocephalic vein using Y-shape visualization of the jugular, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins with an endocavity micro-convex US probe. Visualization of the brachiocephalic vein up to a depth of 8 cm is possible using endocavity micro-convex probes. The verification could be performed during the catheterization procedure in the operating room without the necessitation of chest X-ray imaging.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Ultrasound-guided central venous access: what's new? Schmidt GA, Maizel J, Slama M. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:705–707. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3628-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Loss of the guide wire: mishap or blunder? Schummer W, Schummer C, Gaser E, Bartunek R. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091217365765. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:144–146. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE TA 49: guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheter. [Oct;2002 ];https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta49 NICE Technology Appraisal 49: Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. 2013
- 4.A novel use of the endocavity (transvaginal) ultrasound probe: central venous access in the ED. Phelan MP. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073567570242253X?via%3Dihub. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;3:220–222. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(02)42253-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Old probe, new method: Y-shape visualization of central veins using endocavitary transducer via omoclavicular acoustic window. Ital I, Balaban O, Aydin T. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:511–513. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular central venous catheter tip positioning via the right subclavian vein using a microconvex probe. Kim SC, Gräff I, Sommer A, Hoeft A, Weber S. J Vasc Access. 2016;21:435–439. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ultrasound ıdentification of the guidewire in the brachiocephalic vein for the prevention of ınadvertent arterial catheterization during ınternal jugular central venous catheter placement. Bowdle A, Jelacic S, Togashi K, Ferreira R. Anesth Analg. 2016;123:896–900. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ultrasonography as a guide during vascular access procedures and in the diagnosis of complications. Vezzani A, Manca T, Vercelli A, Braghieri A, Magnacavallo A. J Ultrasound. 2013;29:161–170. doi: 10.1007/s40477-013-0046-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ultrasound confirmation of central venous catheter position via a right supraclavicular fossa view using a microconvex probe: an observational pilot study. Kim SC, Heinze I, Schmiedel A, Baumgarten G, Knuefermann P, Hoeft A, Weber S. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:29–36. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Visualization of the superior vena cava in the supraclavicular acoustic window. Weber SU, Breuer A, Kim SC. Anaesthesist. 2016;65:190–197. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0146-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.A novel technique for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian cannulation. Mallin M, Louis H, Madsen T. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28:966–969. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the left subclavian vein without recognition of persistent left superior vena cava: a case report. Park SY, Yoo JH, Kim MG, Kim SH, Park BW, Oh HC, Kim H. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:6803. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Catheter malpositions: a seven cases report. Emre H, Soyoral YU, Begenik H, Erdur MF, Aldemir MN, Erkoc R. Sakarya Medical Journal. 2011 Mar;1:98–102. [Google Scholar]





