1. INTRODUCTION
The bladder is lined by urothelium, a transitional epithelium, which is generally considered to be a poorly permeable urine‐blood barrier with a crucial function to separate tissues of the urinary tract from the noxious composition of urine.1 Although it is believed that kidneys are responsible for the final concentration and volume of urine, significant in vivo reabsorption and secretion of Na+, K+, urea and creatinine has been measured in rabbit and rat bladders,1, 2 as well as difference in urine composition between the renal pelvis and voided urine in human subjects, indicating net water uptake.3
Recent studies have shown that the urothelium expresses transmembrane water channels, aquaporins (AQPs). Currently 13 AQP (0‐12) subtypes have been identified in mammalian tissues, and from these subtypes, AQP3, AQP4, AQP7 and AQP9 have been found in the human urothelium4 and AQP1, AQP2 and AQP3 in rat urothelium,5 indicating that AQPs could regulate urothelial cell volume and osmolarity, determining the final composition of urine.
Although AQPs have been identified in normal human urothelial cells, their exact functional role requires further investigation. The adult pig bladder offers a viable animal model as it has comparable structural and physiological properties to the human bladder.6, 7 We report the initial stage to characterize the expression and localization of AQPs in adult pig urinary bladder.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Tissue preparations
Bladders were dissected from ~6‐months old female pigs (Sus scrofa domestica), obtained at a local abattoir (Langford Abattoir, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK). Tissues were placed in ice‐cold physiological Kreb's solution gassed with 95%O2/5%CO2 (pH 7.4). From each bladder dome, urothelial cell suspension and mucosa samples (urothelium and lamina propria) were obtained. Urothelial cell suspension (30‐50 mg tissue) was obtained by gentle scraping of the luminal surface of the bladder with a scalpel blade and suspending the cells in the RNA lysis buffer. Strips of urothelium plus lamina propria (mucosa) were dissected from the anterior wall of the dome of the bladder following the natural plane of division. Mucosa samples were washed four times in PBS prior to RNA extraction.
2.2. RNA isolation and AQP transcription
Tissue samples were homogenized in RNA lysis buffer. Total RNA was extracted from mucosa and urothelium of 25 pig bladders using Promega SV total RNA isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA samples were first amplified for Glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a housekeeping gene (Table 1). Sterile water replaced cDNA template as a negative control. Samples were then amplified using primers specific to AQPs 1‐11 (Invitrogen, UK, Table 1). PCR was carried out as: 5‐min denaturation at 94°C; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s; annealing temperature for 1‐min (different annealing temperatures, Table 1); 1‐min at 70°C; 5‐min final extension at 70°C. Amplified PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and sequenced (Eurofin MWG, Germany).
Table 1.
Name of primer/Accession number | Forward primer (5′‐3′) | Reverse primer (5′‐3′) | PS (bp) | AT (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
AQP1 (NM_214454.1) | AGCTGCCAGATCAGTGTCCT | CCAGTGGTCCTGGAAGTTGT | 375 | 60.9 |
AQP2 (NM_001128476.1) | GCTGCCATGTCTCCTTTCTC | TCATGGAGCAGCCAGTGTAG | 318 | 59.0 |
AQP3 (NM_001110172.1) | GGGACCCTTATCCTCGTGAT | AGAAGCCATTGACCATGTCC | 394 | 58.2 |
AQP4 (NM_001110423.1) | TTGCTTTGGACTCAGCATTG | TGACATCAGTCCGTTTGGAA | 332 | 57.5 |
AQP5 (NM_001110424.1) | GAAGGAGGTGTGCTCTCTGG | CGTGTTGTTGTTGAGCGAGT | 373 | 59.5 |
AQP6 (NM_001128467.1) | TGGATGACTGTCAGCAAAGC | CCTCAGGTATGACCCCGTAA | 316 | 58.3 |
AQP7 (NM_001113438.1) | AGAGTTCTTGGCCGAGTTCA | ACCGGTCACTGTCAGCTTTC | 346 | 59.6 |
AQP8 (NM_001112683.1) | GCCTGTCGGTCATTGAGAAT | GGATGATCTCTGCCACCACT | 333 | 58.6 |
AQP9 (XM_005659551.1) | TGCATTTGCAGACCAGGTAG | CTGGTTTGTCCTCCGATTGT | 380 | 58.7 |
AQP10 (NM_001128454.1) | TTGTGCTCATGCTCTTCACC | GGATAGGTGGCAAAGATGGA | 355 | 57.7 |
AQP11 (NM_001112682.1) | CGCTTTCGTCTTGGAGTTTC | GGAGCAGATGGCCTCTATCA | 388 | 58.4 |
GAPDH (XM_005658673.2) | CACGTTGGGGGTGGGGACAC | ACCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGG | 171 | 60.0 |
AT, annealing temperature; bp, base pairs; PS, product size.
2.3. Immunohistochemistry
Fixed bladder samples from pigs (n = 12) were processed and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (3 μm), placed on (3‐Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane coated slides, were blocked for endogenous peroxidase activity by incubation in 0.3% H2O2, prepared in 100% methanol (30‐min at ~20°C). Slides were then placed in sodium citrate antigen retrieval buffer followed by incubation with the specific primary antibody (AQP1, 3, 9 and 11 polyclonal antibodies, 1:1000‐1:1500 dilutions, Almone, Israel) overnight at 4°C. Negative controls replaced the primary antibody with the relevant peptide.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Identification of AQPs 1, 3, 9 and 11 transcripts in adult pig bladder
RT‐PCR demonstrated the expression of AQP1 in the mucosa but not the urothelium (Figure 1) and AQP3, AQP9 and AQP11 in both the mucosa and the urothelium of pig bladder (Figure 1). The expression of AQP2, AQP4‐8 and AQP10 could not be detected. Direct sequencing of the AQP PCR amplicons from bladder tissue yielded partial sequences (~276‐354 bp) with homology range of 97%–100% with Sus scrofa AQPs 1, 3, 9 and 11 (for accession numbers see Table 1).
3.2. Immunoperoxidase labelling of AQP1, 3, 9 and 11 in adult pig bladder
AQP1 immunoreactivity was present in the lamina propria, localized to endothelial cells in capillaries and arterioles (Figure 2A). AQP3 and 11 labelling was detected throughout the urothelium (Figure 2B,D). AQP9 labelling was identified in the upper region of the urothelium which would include umbrella and intermediate cells (Figure 2C). AQP1, 3, 9 and 11 peptide controls showed no labelling in the bladder (representative Figure 2E).
4. DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to determine the expression profile of AQPs in the adult pig bladder as it is a convenient model to describe human bladder function. RNA expression and protein translation of AQP1, AQP3, AQP9 and AQP11 were found.
AQP1 was confined to lamina propria blood vessels, as observed in rat bladder and ureter.5 The functional role of AQP1 in proximal tubular and descending limb of the loop of Henlé epithelium is to mediate water fluxes. AQP1 is also expressed in mice airways and lungs where it facilitates osmotic water transport across alveolar microvascular endothelium.8 However, AQP1 knockout had no impact on alveolar fluid absorption, impaired humidification or lung CO2 transport.8 Similarly, deletion of AQP1 in the microvascular endothelial cells of salivary gland in mice had no effect on the secretion of saliva.8 It appears that AQP1 has limited physiological function in fluid movement in the endothelium, but its functional role in the microvasculature of the bladder mucosa is unknown.
AQP3 was expressed throughout the urothelium of the pig bladder, consistent with data from human and rat bladder urothelium.4, 5 Rubenwolf et al9 also reported that AQP3 was located especially at the intercellular borders of basal and intermediate cells, but in the pig bladder, this study demonstrated that distribution was homogeneous throughout the urothelium. AQP3 transports several neutrally charged solutes, including water, glycerol and urea. Exposure of human urothelial cells to hyperosmolar NaCl (500 mosm/kg) solutions increased AQP3 expression, followed by protein migration to the surface membrane.9 This suggests that AQP3 expression and migration is part of a mechanism to regulate urothelial cell osmolarity and volume during increased osmotic stress as caused by exposure to urine of variable osmolality. AQP3 is a member of the aquaglyceroporins and thus also transports urea and other solutes.10 Based on the similarities in the function of AQP3 and urea transporter B, which has also been found in the urothelium11 it may be postulated that AQP3 also facilitates the transfer of urea across the bladder urothelium.
AQP9 was detected more on the apical surface of the pig urothelium, that is umbrella and intermediate cells. Basal cells differentiate into intermediate and umbrella cells12 and other studies have shown that AQP9 expression is evident in differentiating keratinocytes13 and human urothelium cultures.4 AQP9 belongs to the aquaglyceroporins and a 3D‐structural analysis of APQ9 showed a larger pore size compared to other AQPs and can explain its ability to transport larger molecules such as lactate, purines and pyrimidines.14 Thus, AQP9 could modify the final composition of urine by facilitating transport of various solutes across the bladder urothelium.
AQP11 was identified throughout the urothelium. AQP11 is mainly present in the endoplasmic reticulum and only a fraction migrates to the cell membrane to facilitate glycerol and water transport.15 AQP11 expression has also been shown in human adipocytes where it functions as a water and glycerol channel.15 Thus, AQP11 may act as a water and glycerol transporter in bladder urothelium under osmotic stress.
In conclusion, AQP1, 3, 9 and 11 are present in adult pig bladder, suggesting that AQPs may regulate urothelium cell volume and determine the final urine composition. Changes to the extracellular osmolality may also generate membrane stress, and release various transmitters from the bladder urothelium, affecting bladder contractility and sensory nerve transduction. However, the exact role of AQPs in mediating the sensory and contractile functions of the bladder wall is unknown.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.
Manso M, Drake MJ, Fry CH, Conway M, Hancock JT, Vahabi B. Expression and localization of aquaporin water channels in adult pig urinary bladder. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:3772–3775. 10.1111/jcmm.14256
REFERENCES
- 1. Hohlbrugger G. Changes of hypo‐ and hypertonic sodium chloride induced by the rat urinary bladder at various filling stages. Evidence for an increased transurothelial access of urine to detrusor nerve and muscle cells with distension. Eur Urol. 1987;13:83‐89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Negrete HO, Lavelle JP, Berg J, et al. Permeability properties of the intact mammalian bladder epithelium. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:F886‐F894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cahill DJ, Fry CH, Foxall PJ. Variation in urine composition in the human urinary tract: evidence of urothelial function in situ? J Urol. 2003;169:871‐874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rubenwolf PC, Georgopoulos NT, Clements LA, et al. Expression and localisation of aquaporin water channels in human urothelium in situ and in vitro. Eur Urol. 2009;56:1013‐1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Spector DA, Wade JB, Dillow R, et al. Expression, localization, and regulation of aquaporin‐1 to ‐3 in rat urothelia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;282:F1034‐F1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sibley GN. A comparison of spontaneous and nerve‐mediated activity in bladder muscle from man, pig and rabbit. J Physiol. 1984;354:431‐443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Crowe R, Burnstock G. A histochemical and immunohistochemical study of the autonomic innervation of the lower urinary tract of the female pig. Is the pig a good model for the human bladder and urethra? J Urol. 1989;141:414‐422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Song Y, Jayaraman S, Yang B, Matthay MA, Verkman As. Role of aquaporin water channels in airway fluid transport, humidification, and surface liquid hydration. J Gen Physiol. 2001;117:573‐582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rubenwolf PC, Georgopoulos NT, Kirkwood LA, et al. Aquaporin expression contributes to human transurothelial permeability in vitro and is modulated by NaCl. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Litman T, Søgaard R, Zeuthen T. Ammonia and urea permeability of mammalian aquaporins. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;327–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hou R, Alemozaffar M, Yang B, Sands JM, Kong X, Chen G. Identification of a novel UT‐B urea transporter in human urothelial cancer. Front Physiol. 2017;8:245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Papafotiou G, Paraskevopoulou V, Vasilaki E, Kanaki Z, Paschalidis N, Klinakis A. KRT14 marks a subpopulation of bladder basal cells with pivotal role in regeneration and tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sugiyama Y, Ota Y, Hara M, Inoue S. Osmotic stress up‐regulates aquaporin‐3 gene expression in cultured human keratinocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1522:82‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Viadiu H, Gonen T, Walz T. Projection map of aquaporin‐9 at 7 A resolution. J Mol Biol Mol. 2007;367:80‐88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Madeira A, Fernández‐Veledo S, Camps M, et al. Human aquaporin‐11 is a water and glycerol channel and localizes in the vicinity of lipid droplets in human adipocytes. Obesity. 2014;22:2010‐2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]