Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2019 May 2;112(5):271–275. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000974

Incidence of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injuries in Iraq and Afghanistan

Xandria Gutierrez 1, Michael April 1, Joseph Maddry 1, Guyon Hill 1, Tyson Becker 1, Steven Schauer 1
PMCID: PMC6485296  PMID: 31050794

Cervical spine injuries in pediatric trauma patients are uncommon, and subsequently, proper diagnosis and the efficacy of spinal motion restriction in these patients remain a subject of contention. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Key Words: cervical, fracture, pediatric, spine, trauma

Abstract

Objective

Military providers frequently treat civilians, including pediatric patients. Cervical spine injuries in pediatric trauma patients occur infrequently, with limited data on the incidence. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Methods

We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry for all pediatric encounters from January 2007 to January 2016. We searched within that dataset for all cervical spine fractures.

Results

From January 2007 through January 2016 there were 3439 pediatric encounters. There were 36 subjects identified (1.0%) with a cervical spine fracture. Of those with a cervical spine fracture, 6 (17%) had a prehospital cervical collar placed, which did not improve survival to hospital discharge (collar, 66.7% vs no collar, 83.3%, P = 0.573). Of those with a cervical spine fracture, 6 (17%) had a documented spinal cord injury. The median age of subjects with a cervical spine fracture was 9.5 years and the majority (63.9%) were male. Most were injured by explosion (41.7%). The median composite injury score was higher in subjects with a cervical spine fracture compared with those without one (16.5 vs 10, P < 0.001). Subjects with a cervical spine fracture had longer lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (median 3 days vs 1, P = 0.012) and a trend toward worse survival to hospital discharge (80.6%, n = 29, vs 90.3%, n = 3074, P = 0.079).

Conclusions

Cervical spine injuries occurred infrequently in pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. When a fracture was present, almost one in five patients had spinal cord involvement. The pediatric prehospital literature would benefit from the development of a clinical decision tool to guide prehospital personnel as to when a cervical collar is indicated. Moreover, appropriate size equipment should be available when caring for host national civilians.


Key Points

  • Children made up 5% to 15% of all admissions to combat support hospitals, with their lengths of stay frequently being longer and more complicated than those of adults.

  • Spinal cord injury exists in only 1% to 2% of pediatric trauma patients, with cervical spine injuries representing 60% to 80% of all pediatric vertebral injuries.

  • Identifying the incidence of pediatric cervical spine injuries in theater could direct further training for medical care providers.

Military medical providers frequently are required to treat children in Iraq and Afghanistan based on the medical rules of eligibility.1 The medical rules of eligibility throughout the theaters of war varied both in time frame of conflict and location, with Afghanistan generally featuring a more liberal use of US resources. Children made up 5% to 15% of all admissions to combat support hospitals. When admitted, their lengths of stay are frequently longer and more complicated.2 The longer stays often are the result of challenges in transferring children to their local health systems, which is in contrast to the US and Coalition service members, who are rapidly transported out of the combat theater.

The pediatric population has a combination of anatomic, physiologic, metabolic, and psychological differences that require different approaches to treatment compared with adults with similar injuries. In addition, pediatric patients may experience different responses to treatment than do their adult counterparts.3 Because of the smaller size of a child, the force of a trauma is more widely dispersed throughout his or her body.4,5 The larger surface area of the child’s body relative to his or her weight gives him or her a predilection toward substantial heat loss and other potential adverse effects.4 In addition, pediatric treatment can be challenging because of a child’s ability to metabolize some medications differently than do adults.6,7

Previous studies report that spinal cord injury occurs in only 1% to 2% of pediatric trauma patients, with cervical spine injuries representing 60% to 80% of all pediatric vertebral injuries.8,9 Children are predisposed to injuries of the bones and soft tissues of the cervical spine because of incomplete ossification, vertebral configuration, and laxity of the ligaments.5,8,10 Younger children tend to have a propensity for cervical spine injuries at the upper level potentially as a result of their immature pediatric cervical spine, while older children tend to have a lower incidence of injury.10,11 Studies have demonstrated that there is a high incidence of neurologic deficits in pediatric patients with cervical spine injuries, with the overall mortality rate being high and often related to associated head injuries.8,1012

The published studies on cervical spine injuries in the pediatric population are limited because most major trauma centers treat one to two patients with this injury per year.6,13,14 Universal consensus as to whether cervical spine immobilization in the pediatric population is beneficial or detrimental following a trauma is lacking.11,15,16 No data exist describing the incidence of pediatric cervical spine injuries during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. We sought to describe the incidence of pediatric cervical spine injuries during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan with the anticipation that it will reflect the low incidence of the civilian population.

Methods

Data Acquisition

We identified subjects as part of a study seeking to evaluate prehospital and emergency department interventions for pediatric trauma patients.17,18 The US Army Institute of Surgical Research regulatory office reviewed protocol H-16-014 and determined it was exempt from institutional review board oversight. We obtained only deidentified data.

Subjects and Setting

We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric (17 years or younger) encounters from January 2007 and January 2016 in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data within the registry. We included subjects with missing data provided there was a documented age or estimated age within the records. We retrieved all of the available documentation of prehospital care and fixed-facility-based care. Within that dataset, we searched for all subjects with a documented cervical spine fracture.

The DODTR, formerly known as the Joint Theater Trauma Registry, is the data repository for DOD trauma-related injuries.19,20 The DODTR includes documentation regarding demographics, injury-producing incidents, diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes of injuries sustained by US/non-US military and US/non-US civilian personnel in wartime and peacetime from the point of injury to final disposition. Subjects are enrolled in the DODTR if they are admitted to a Role 3 (fixed facility) or forward surgical team (FST) with an injury diagnosis using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) between 800 and 959.9, near-drowning/drowning with associated injury (ICD-9 994.1), or inhalational injury (ICD-9 987.9), and if the trauma occurred within 72 hours of presentation.

Data Analysis

We performed a statistical analysis using Microsoft Excel version 10 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and JMP Statistical Discovery version 13 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Study variables were compared using a Student t test for continuous variables, a Wilcoxon rank sum test for ordinal variables, and a χ2 test for nominal variables.

Results

From January 2007 through January 2016 there were 42,790 encounters in the DODTR. Of those, 3439 (8.0%) were pediatric by documented or estimated age. Of the 3439, 36 subjects were identified (1.0%) with a cervical spine fracture. Of those with a cervical spine fracture, 6 (17%) had a prehospital cervical collar placed. Prehospital cervical collar placement did not improve survival to hospital discharge (collar placed, 66.7%, n = 4 vs no collar placed, 83.3%, n = 25, P = 0.573). Of those with a cervical spine fracture, 6 (17%) had a documented spinal cord injury. Within that group with a cord injury, 5 (83%) survived to hospital discharge. The median age of subjects with a cervical spine fracture was 9.5 years and the majority (63.9%, n = 23) were male.

The most frequent mechanism of injury was explosion (41.7%, n = 15). The median composite injury score was higher in subjects with a cervical spine fracture compared with those without one (16.5 vs 10, P < 0.001). Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) measurements were worse in subjects with a cervical spine injury for the head/neck (median 3/interquartile range 3–4.75 vs median 0/interquartile range 0–2, P < 0.001), face (0/0–1.75 vs 0/0–0, P = 0.035), and thorax (0/0–2 vs 0/0–0, P = 0.002). AIS was lower for the skin/superficial (0.5/0–1 vs 1/0–1, P = 0.013). Subjects with a cervical spine fracture had longer lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (median 3 days vs 1, P = 0.012) and a trend toward worse survival to hospital discharge (80.6%, n = 29 vs 90.3%, n = 3403, P = 0.079; Table 1). When using a dichotomized AIS of ≥3 to delineate serious injuries by body region, those with a cervical spine fracture had higher rates of serious injuries to the head/neck (77.8%, n = 28 vs 23.4%, n = 797, P < 0.001) and a trend toward lower rates of serious injuries for the superficial/skin (0%, n = 0 vs 8.1%, n = 275, P = 0.075; Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographics and outcome data of subjects with a cervical spine fracture

graphic file with name smj-112-271-g001.jpg

Table 2.

Serious injuries (AIS ≥3) by body region

graphic file with name smj-112-271-g002.jpg

Discussion

We describe the incidence of cervical spine injuries in pediatric trauma patients in the joint combat theaters in Iraq and Afghanistan. To our knowledge, no prior studies have examined this injury type in this specific population. We found that the subjects with a cervical spine fracture had a median age of 9.5 years, were male, and were most frequently injured by explosion. There was a total of 36 pediatric patients with a cervical spine fracture, 6 of whom had a documented spinal cord injury. Of that group, 83% survived to hospital discharge. Our data mirror previous reports that cervical spine fractures occur more frequently in young children than in adolescents.21

According to the data collected by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network, the most common mechanism of cervical spine injury in the civilian pediatric population if younger than 2 years or 2 to 7 years of age was a motor vehicle crash. For patients between the ages of 8 and 15 years, the most common causes of injury were sports injuries and motor vehicle crashes.22 In contrast, we found our population to be most frequently injured by mechanisms related to war, including explosions and gunshot wounds, and the average age being 9.5 years. Our data are congruent with that of Mohseni et al, who found that the incidence of pediatric cervical spine injury increases sharply after 9 years of age.23

Overall, our results showed that the incidence of cervical spine injuries was relatively low, with only 1.0% incidence within the dataset. The results were similar to those of civilian studies, which demonstrated the infrequent occurrence of cervical spine injuries in pediatric populations.8,1012 In our study, cervical spine injuries were more common in males than females, which also is consistent with previous reports.8,12,24 Eleraky et al reported that of the cases with cervical spine injuries, 40% of the injuries were associated with head trauma.25 Our findings indicated a higher rate of serious injuries to the head/neck region in those with a cervical spine injury (77.8% vs 23.4%). As expected with the nature of polytraumatic injuries, subjects with a cervical spine fracture had a higher median composite injury score (16.5) compared with those without a cervical spine fracture (10) and associated longer intensive care courses. These data are consistent with the findings of Chan et al, who found that patients with cervical spine injuries had higher injury severity scores and longer pediatric intensive care unit and hospital stays.26

The use of cervical collars is a prioritized procedure in the Advanced Trauma Life Support and the Prehospital Trauma Life Support guidelines from the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians.2729 In our study we found that 17% of patients with a cervical spine fracture had a cervical collar placed before arrival at the hospital. The lack of cervical collar placement is likely the result of most units not carrying pediatric-sized equipment in the prehospital setting. In addition, the use of cervical collars is not universally recommended within the Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines, and most military medics do not have pediatric-specific training, which may add to challenges in identifying children at higher risk for cervical spine injury. Independent of injury severity markers, it has been found that following a trauma, spinal immobilization is associated with increased pain, increased use of cervical spine imaging studies, and admission to a hospital.16 The risks of immobilization may outweigh the benefits, because we found that the AIS of regions other than the head/neck was not associated with cervical fracture. In addition, our data suggest that cervical spine injury is low in children without evidence of head/neck trauma. Our data also suggest there may be inadequate evidence to support the use of uniform immobilization; the development of a clinical decision tool for children would be beneficial.30,31

There are several limitations of this study. First, the observational nature of our investigation means that we can only demonstrate correlation and not causation. Second, for an encounter to be generated within the DODTR, subjects must arrive at the FST or fixed facility alive or with ongoing interventions for an encounter to be generated. Because our database excludes all subjects not surviving to the FST or fixed facility unless they are receiving ongoing interventions, we are unable to characterize subjects who died before arriving at the hospital. Third, we do not have data on transport times for each encounter, which may have had an effect on outcomes. A final limitation of note is that we included data even if they were incomplete in the DODTR.17

Conclusions

Cervical spine injuries occurred infrequently in pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. When a fracture was present, almost one in five patients had spinal cord involvement. The expert recommendations for spinal immobilization remain a point of contention that need to be further examined to determine whether spinal immobilization is detrimental or useful. The pediatric prehospital literature would benefit from the development of a clinical decision tool to guide prehospital personnel as to when a cervical collar is indicated. Moreover, appropriate size equipment should be available when caring for host national civilians.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Joint Trauma System Data Analysis Branch for their efforts with data acquisition.

Footnotes

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the US Departments of the Army and Air Force, or the Department of Defense.

T.B. has received compensation from grants from the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and Neural Analytics. The remaining authors did not report any financial relationships or conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.McGuigan R, Spinella PC, Beekley A, et al. Pediatric trauma: experience of a combat support hospital in Iraq. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:207–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Creamer KM, Edwards MJ, Shields CH, et al. Pediatric wartime admissions to US military combat support hospitals in Afghanistan and Iraq: learning from the first 2,000 admissions. J Trauma 2009;67:762–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mikrogianakis A, Grant V. The kids are alright: pediatric trauma pearls. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2018;36:237–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kenefake ME, Swarm M, Walthall J. Nuances in pediatric trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2013;31:627–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seid T, Ramaiah R, Grabinsky A. Pre-hospital care of pediatric patients with trauma. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2012;2:114–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bauman BH, McManus JG., Jr Pediatric pain management in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005;23:393–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2001;108:793–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kokoska ER, Keller MS, Rallo MC, et al. Characteristics of pediatric cervical spine injuries. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:100–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baker C, Kadish H, Schunk JE. Evaluation of pediatric cervical spine injuries. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:230–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Platzer P, Jaindl M, Thalhammer G, et al. Cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients. J Trauma 2007;62:389–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Partrick DA, Bensard DD, Moore EE, et al. Cervical spine trauma in the injured child: a tragic injury with potential for salvageable functional outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:1571–1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patel JC, Tepas JJ, 3rd, Mollitt DL, et al. Pediatric cervical spine injuries: defining the disease. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:373–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ribeiro da Silva M, Linhares D, Cacho Rodrigues P, et al. Paediatric cervical spine injures. Nineteen years experience of a single centre. Int Orthop 2016;40:1111–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Finch GD, Barnes MJ. Major cervical spine injuries in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:811–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Browne LR, Schwartz H, Ahmad FA, et al. Interobserver agreement in pediatric cervical spine injury assessment between prehospital and emergency department providers. Acad Emerg Med 2017;24:1501–1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leonard JC, Mao J, Jaffe DM, et al. Potential adverse effects of spinal immobilization in children. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012;16:513–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schauer SG, Hill GJ, Naylor JF, et al. Emergency department resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. Am J Emerg Med 2018;36:1540–1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schauer SG, April MD, Hill GJ, et al. Prehospital interventions performed on pediatric traumapatients in Iraq and Afghanistan. Prehosp Emerg Care 2018;22:624–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Glenn MA, Martin KD, Monzon D, et al. Implementation of a combat casualty trauma registry. J Trauma Nurs 2008;15:181–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.O'Connell KM, Littleton-Kearney MT, Bridges E, et al. Evaluating the Joint Theater Trauma Registry as a data source to benchmark casualty care. Mil Med 2012;177:546–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.d'Amato C. Pediatric spinal trauma: injuries in very young children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;(432):34–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leonard JR, Jaffe DM, Kuppermann N, et al. Cervical spine injury patterns in children. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1179–e1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mohseni S, Talving P, Branco BC, et al. Effect of age on cervical spine injury in pediatric population: a National Trauma Data Bank review. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1771–1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jain A, Brooks JT, Rao SS, et al. Cervical fractures with associated spinal cord injury in children and adolescents: epidemiology, costs, and in-hospital mortality rates in 4418 patients. J Child Orthop 2015;9:171–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eleraky MA, Theodore N, Adams M, et al. Pediatric cervical spine injuries: report of 102 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2000;92(1 suppl):12–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chan M, Al-Buali W, Singh RN, et al. Cervical spine injuries and collar complications in severely injured paediatric trauma patients. Spinal Cord 2013;51:360–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sundstrøm T, Asbjørnsen H, Habiba S, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review. J Neurotrauma 2014;31:531–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Student Course Manual. 9th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prehospital Trauma Life Support Committee of the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians in Cooperation with the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons. Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS). 7th ed Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hauswald M, Braude D. Spinal immobilization in trauma patients: is it really necessary? Curr Opin Crit Care 2002;8:566–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 2000;343:94–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Southern Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES