Abstract
NK cells are innate lymphoid cells, which play a key role in the immune response to cancer and pathogens and participate in the shaping of adaptive immunity. NK cells engage in a complex bidirectional interaction with myelomonocytic cells. In particular, macrophages, dendritic cells and neutrophils promote differentiation and effector function of NK cells and, on the other hand, myelomonocytic cells express triggers of checkpoint blockade (e.g. PD-L1) and other immunosuppressive molecules, which negatively regulate NK cell function. In addition, NK cells express high levels of IL-1R8, which acts as a checkpoint for IL-18 driven differentiation and activation of NK cells. Evidence suggests that targeting the myeloid cell-NK cell crosstalk unleashes effective antitumor and antiviral resistance.
Introduction
Natural Killer cells (NK) are innate lymphoid cells that play a key role in the immune responses against cancer and pathogens [1, 2]. NK cell activation depends on a delicate balance between activating and inhibitory signals and the integration of these pathways may prevent NK self-reactivity and governs NK cell activation in the presence of cells in “distress” [3, 4]. NK cells, once activated, can be actively cytotoxic through the release of perforin and granzymes and can secrete cytokines, such as IFNγ, thus participating in the shaping of the adaptive immune responses [4–8]. NK cell effector functions also include antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC): NK cells recognize antibody-coated target cells through the FcγRIIIA (CD16), which is coupled to CD3ζ and FcRγ transducing chains bearing the ITAM (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif) domains [3, 9]. NK cells recognize damaged, stressed, infected or tumor cells, which upregulate or express de novo ligands interacting with activating NK cell receptors. Stress-induced ligands on host cells, such as human ULBP and MIC or mouse RAE1, H60 and MULT1 molecules can interact with the activating receptor NKG2D on NK cells [10]. Other ligands of activating receptors are viral encoded non-self ligands, which include cytomegalovirus-encoded m157, directly recognized by Ly49H in the mouse, and TLR ligands, even though the direct role of TLRs in NK cells remains an unsettled issue [11–15]. The natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCR), such as NKp46/NCR1, NKp44/NCR2 and NKp30/NCR3, which are linked to ITAM-bearing CD3ζ, FcRγ or DAP12, are other potent activating receptors, playing a major role in tumor/leukemia cell lysis. NKp46 was reported to interact with influenza- and parainfluenza derived hemagglutinins [16]. NCR also interact with soluble ligands with either agonist or antagonist activity. For example, PDGF-DD and Nidogen-1 bind to NKp44 inducing NK cell activation and inhibition, respectively [17, 18]. Finally, a role for other activating receptors such as DNAM-1 belonging to the nectin family and 2B4 belonging to the SLAM family have been also described [4].
NK cell inhibitory receptors prevent autoreactivity while allowing recognition and killing of stressed target cells. NK cells express several MHC class I-specific inhibitory receptors that include the lectin-like Ly49 dimers in the mouse, the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) in humans and the CD94-NKG2A heterodimers in both species, all sharing the intra-cytoplasmic inhibitory ITIMs (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs) domains [19–21]. Other NK cell inhibitory receptors act in a MHC class I independent manner [21–23]. NK cells can sense the lack of MHC class I occurring in virally infected or tumor cells and this process is called the “missing self” recognition [24, 25]. Thus, healthy cells that express MHC class I molecules and low levels of stress-induced molecules are protected from NK cell killing, whereas cells “in distress” that up-regulate stress-induced ligands and downregulate MHC class I molecules are recognized and killed [23, 26, 27]. The acquisition of NK cell tolerance to self depends on the expression of MHC class I specific-inhibitory receptors and on the “education” or “licensing” system. NK cell education occurs during NK cell development and leads to the prevention of auto-reactivity, ensuring the generation of self-tolerant killer cells [28–30]. Since NK cell receptors do not undergo somatic recombination, their potential for autoreactivity is due to the fact that the expression pattern of MHC class I receptors is largely random. Some NK cells lack inhibitory receptors that recognize MHC class I, and/or express activating receptors that recognize self ligands, including MHC molecules [20]. During the education process, NK cells that lack self MHC-specific inhibitory receptors become hyporesponsive. For instance, in mice or humans that lack MHC class I molecules, NK cells fail to kill MHC class-I deficient autologous cells and display reduced responses to other stimulations [31–33]. NK cells that express receptors specific for MHC are properly functional, since they are responsive to activating signals, but still tolerant to self cells, because of the interaction between inhibitory receptors and their MHC ligands [34, 35]. The intensity and quality of NK cell response reflects the number of self-MHC inhibitory receptors as well as of activating receptors expressed by NK cells and their ligands on target cells.
Finally, the functional activation of NK cells is modulated through the cross-talk with other leukocytes. Thanks to the broad repertoire of pattern recognition molecules, phagocytes have the potential to recognize a variety of microbial moieties of bacterial, fungal, viral and parasite origin, as well as damage associated molecular patterns. They can sense infections and tissue damage, thus activating innate immune responses and orienting adaptive immune responses. Innate immune activation leads to release of cytokines and other soluble mediators, and to activation of cell-to-cell contacts among leukocytes and other cell types, such as endothelial cells. NK cell responses are affected by the cytokine microenvironment and the interaction with other immune cells, such as dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, neutrophils and T cells. IL-12, IL-18, IL-15 and type I IFN are strong activators of NK cell effector functions and IL-2 favors NK cell proliferation and activation (Figure 1). CD4+ T cell-produced IL-2 in lymph nodes, and DC and macrophage-derived IL-18 and IL-15 activate NK cells, whereas T regulatory cell-derived TGFβ negatively regulates NK cell functions. It has been appreciated that, despite their original definition as natural killers, NK cells do require “priming” to gain a full activation state. IL-15 and IL-18 are well-described mediators of NK cell priming in both steady state and inflammatory conditions [36–44].
Figure 1. NK cell activation mediated by dendritic cells, neutrophils and macrophages.
Both soluble factors and cell-to-cell contact are involved in the induction or boosting of NK cell effector functions. DCs, neutrophils and macrophages produce IL-12, IL-18, IFNβ, TNFα and IL-15 which induce NK cell activation. IFNβ is responsible for the production of IL-15, which can occur not only in DCs but also in NK cells themselves.
Here we will focus on the interplay between phagocytes and NK cells, and on the impact of this cross-talk on NK cell and phagocyte responses in both physiological and pathological conditions.
The interaction between NK cells and macrophages
Macrophages are able to prime NK cells through soluble factors and cell-to-cell contact and, in turn, NK cells can produce several inflammatory mediators, thus shaping the microenvironment, including macrophages [45] (Figure 1). M1 and M2 macrophages represent the two extremes of a continuous spectrum, including M1-like or M2-like functional states, which occur in vivo either under physiological conditions, such as ontogenesis and pregnancy or in pathological processes, such as allergic and chronic inflammation, tissue repair, infection and cancer. Mirroring the Th1/Th2 paradigm, classical activation, generating M1 macrophages occurs in the presence of bacterial components and Th1 cytokines, such as IFNγ. On the contrary, alternative M2 activation is dependent on Th2 cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-13. Although phagocytosis is a key mechanism shared by both classically and alternatively activated macrophages, functional activation of macrophages leads to cytotoxicity and killing of the pathogen in M1 macrophages, whereas it favors M2-like macrophage-dependent tissue repair, healing, regeneration and angiogenesis [46–48].
Macrophages and NK cells can interact in a contact-dependent manner through the generation of a sort of immune synapse. Indeed, clustering of receptors and adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1 and LFA-1, expressed respectively by macrophages and NK cells, as well as accumulation of F-actin, was observed at the site of contact [49]. Regarding soluble mediators, in the early 1990s it was demonstrated that macrophage-produced TNFα and IL-12 induced the secretion of IFNγ by NK cells, whereas macrophage TGFβ production inhibited lung NK cell activation. Then, IL-12, IL-18, IL-15 and IL-23 emerged as the key cytokines responsible for NK cell activation and their prominent role was originally demonstrated using macrophages infected with different pathogens [44, 45]. Indeed, several studies showed that macrophages stimulated with TLR agonists [50–52], infected with parasites (Plasmodium falciparum and Leishmania) [53, 54], viruses (influenza A virus, Sendai virus, human cytomegalovirus) [55] or bacteria (Salmonella, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Bacillus anthracis) [56–61] induced NK cell activation, leading to CD69 expression, IFNγ production and degranulation. The interaction between NK cell 2B4 and macrophage CD48 was reported to be critical for the induction of NK cell proliferation and IFNγ production, but not of NK cell cytotoxicity [62]. Moreover, it was observed that upon priming with IL-2 and IL-15 produced by accessory cells, IL-12 and IL-18, both secreted by Salmonella-infected macrophages, induced a full NK cell activation [56]. Interestingly, they observed that IL-12Rβ2 co-localized with actin at the immune synapse, suggesting the importance of cell-to-cell contact, as reported for IL-15 in DCs and IL-18 in DCs and macrophages [38–40, 63] (see below). Another group showed that macrophages infected with Salmonella produced high levels of IL-23, IL-18 and IL-1β and these cytokines stimulated NK cells to produce IFNγ and GM-CSF. IFNγ and GM-CSF, in turn, could stimulate the production of IL-23 and IL-12p70 by monocytes and macrophages, confirming the importance of the NK cell-macrophage interplay during Salmonella infection [64]. Lopez-Botet M. and colleagues [55] analysed the different roles of M1 and M2 macrophages in the activation of NK cells, in response to cytomegalovirus infection. NK cells were highly cytotoxic against both M1 and M2-infected macrophages, whereas IFNγ production was only induced by M1 infected macrophages. Cytotoxicity was triggered by NKp46, DNAM-1 and 2B4 activation, whereas IFNγ production was partially dependent on IL-12 produced by macrophages [55]. Finally, NK cells were demonstrated to be activated by LPS-tolerant macrophages. Indeed, NK cells co-cultured with LPS-stimulated macrophages expressed high levels of NKG2D, which, in turn, promoted the recognition and the lysis of overactivated macrophages through various NKG2D ligands, such as UL16-binding proteins (ULBP1, ULBP2 and ULBP3) and MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) [49].
Mattiola I. et al. [41] dissected the crosstalk between human NK cells and autologous in vitro-derived macrophages, unveiling a complex network of interactions. It was shown that resting NK cells were primed to produce IFNγ and expressed higher levels of CD107a and CD69 upon co-culture with M1 macrophages or treatment with M1-conditioned media [41]. IL-1β and IFNβ production by M1 macrophages was responsible for the induction of NKp44 and NKG2D in NK cells and interestingly, IFNβ induced IL-15 cis-presentation in NK cells, consequently enhancing IFNγ production. The triggering of NK cell activating receptors NKp30, NKG2D and 2B4 by M1 macrophages was also involved in cell-to-cell contact dependent NK cell activation. Finally, it was observed that M1-primed NK cells could in turn promote type 1 macrophage skewing, even reverting M2 polarization [41].
Bellora F. et al. [38, 52] showed that M0 and M2 macrophages reprogrammed toward an M1 phenotype through LPS treatment were able to induce NK cell activation, in terms of cytotoxicity, IFNγ production, CD69 expression, IL-2 responsiveness and migration through acquisition of CCR7 expression (Figure 2). IFNγ production was demonstrated to be induced by DNAM-1 and 2B4 pathways in a contact-dependent manner and, interestingly by IL-18 expressed as a membrane-bound form on macrophages [38, 52]. In turn, activated human NK cells were able to kill autologous macrophages in vitro through NKp46 and DNAM-1 [38]. In particular, M1 macrophages were more resistant to lysis compared to M0 and M2 macrophages and this was due to inhibition of NK cells mediated by higher expression of HLA class I molecules in M1-polarizing conditions [52].
Figure 2. IL-18 as a central player in NK cell activation.
IL-18 is a crucial proinflammatory cytokine promoting NK cell activation. M0 and M2 macrophages express a membrane-bound form of IL-18 (mIL-18), which is released upon treatment with LPS. IL-18 release by macrophages favors NK cell activation. DCs express IL-18 upon microbial product exposure and a cell-to-cell proximity is required in order to trigger a full NK cell activation.
Macrophage-NK cell crosstalk is also an important component of the immune response against cancer. NK cells have a key role in the inhibition of tumor progression, through cytotoxic activity and IFNγ production, whereas macrophages recruited in tumors can exert both pro-tumoral and anti-tumoral activity, depending on their polarization state [47, 65]. In this regard, Bellora F. et al. analysed the interaction between tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from ascites of ovarian cancer patients and NK cells [66]. Untreated TAMs induced low upregulation of CD69 and CD25 in NK cells, whereas LPS-treated TAMs regained the capacity to fully activate NK cells, in terms of CD69, CCR7, CD25 expression and IFNγ production. Indeed, LPS-treated TAMs activated NK cell-dependent lysis of a NK cell-resistant ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR-3), possibly through IL-12/IL-18-induced IFNγ production [66].
These studies underline that in type 1-oriented immune responses, NK cells amplify both innate and adaptive responses, as a result of their interaction with M1-polarized macrophages.
Suppression of NK cell function by macrophages
It has long been known that myelomonocytic cells can suppress NK cell activity either as a result of tissue driven differentiation, as shown originally for lung alveolar macrophages [67], or of skewed activation [68]. In particular TAMs are endowed with an armamentarium of immunosuppressive molecules, including triggers of checkpoint blockade [47]. A subset of NK cells [69] has been shown to express PD-1, which triggers functional inhibition. Recent evidence indicated that in Hodgkin’s lymphoma macrophage-expressed PD-L1 is a major driver of NK cell suppression [68]. Macrophage-mediated suppression of NK cells can also be mediated by other complementary pathways such as TGFβ and prostaglandins (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Suppression of NK cell function by macrophages.
NK cell suppression mediated by TAM-derived PGE2, TGFβ and the engagement of PD-1 by macrophage-expressed PD-L1. MΦ: macrophage; TAM: tumor associated macrophage.
The interaction of NK cells and dendritic cells
NK cells were originally defined as spontaneous cytotoxic innate lymphocytes, able to quickly kill target cells, without the need of any prior sensitization, differently from T cells, whose killing mechanism is antigen specific and MHC-restricted. In spite of this, the concept of NK cell priming has emerged and the interplay between NK cells and DCs was identified as a crucial mechanism involved in NK cell priming [1, 70–72].
In particular, it was shown that functional interactions between DCs and NK cells occur. DCs are required for Ly49H+ NK cell accumulation in mouse cytomegalovirus infection and for proper NK cell response in Herpes simplex virus-1 infection [73–76].
It was reported by the Diefenbach’s group that DCs were required for NK cell response to pathogens in vivo and NK cell priming occurred upon IL-15 trans-presentation by DCs [63]. DCs constitutively expressed the IL-15/IL-15Rα complex, which was required for NK cell homeostasis and could be induced by type I IFNs in inflammatory conditions, favoring NK cell priming. Interestingly, it was then observed that IFNβ-induced IL-15/IL-15Rα expression occurred not only in DCs, but also in NK cells themselves, allowing IL-15 cis-presentation and NK cell activation [39] (Figure 1). Remarkably, NK cell activation was impaired when both trans- and cis-presented IL-15 was lacking, whereas NK cell survival and homeostasis relied on a NK cell extrinsic, IL-15-dependent mechanism [39, 77, 78]. LPS- or E. coli-triggered DCs produced IL-2, IL-18 and IFNβ that were crucial not only to prime but indeed to induce a full activation state of NK cells, which were unable to directly sense LPS. Close contacts between DCs and NK-cell in the lymph nodes were essential for the localized delivery of DC-derived IL-18 to NK cells [40] (see below). DC-derived IL-2, IL-18 and IFNβ were also fundamental to elicit NK cell cytotoxic responses, both in vivo in bacterial and viral infections and in vitro [39, 79, 80].
In certain inflammatory or infectious conditions NK cells can be involved in the regulation of the adaptive response, through the killing of immature DCs, which would lead to an improper T cell activation. Immature DCs express lower levels of MHC-I molecules compared to mature DCs, being therefore more susceptible to NK cell-mediated recognition. Defective interactions between NK cells and DCs, and impaired NK cell-mediated lysis of autologous immature DCs have been observed in HIV-1-infected viremic patients [81]. The defective lysis was due to reduced expression of NKp30 and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in NK cells, particularly in a CD56-CD16+ subset [82]. Moreover, mature DCs from viremic patients had reduced capacity to secrete IL-10 and IL-12 and to prime NK cell proliferation and activation [82].
NK cells and neutrophils
The interplay between neutrophils and NK cells has recently emerged as a crucial mechanism regulating innate and adaptive responses (Figure 1). In different contexts, neutrophils were reported to be able to both activate and suppress NK cells [83]. Several groups demonstrated that neutrophil-derived ROS and arginase I could compromise the effector functions of NK cells, in particular of the CD56low NK cell subset [84–89]. In contrast, lactoferrin, elastase and other neutrophil granule-contained proteins were able to induce NK cell activation and cytotoxicity [90, 91].
In vivo models of bacterial infections revealed that neutrophil production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12, IL-15 and possibly IL-18, is crucial to polarize the immune response and favors NK cell-mediated IFNγ production [92, 93]. In agreement, in vitro experiments showed that human TLR-stimulated neutrophils were involved in NK cell activation in an inflammasome-dependent manner [93]. In turn, neutrophil-stimulated NK cells were able to activate DCs, which then promoted T cell IFNγ production and proliferation, unveiling a complex interplay between innate and adaptive immune cells [93]. Moreover, it was recently observed that neutrophils are part of a network of interactions with 6-sulfo LacNAc+ dendritic cells (slanDCs) and NK cells, in which neutrophils induced IL-12 production by slanDCs via CD18/ICAM-1, which in turn promoted NK cell activation [94]. The authors also showed direct NK cell-neutrophil interaction, which occurred through ICAM-3 and CD18, respectively, and led to IFNγ production by NK cells [94]. In line with this, in mice lacking neutrophils and in patients with autoimmune or severe congenital neutropenia NK cells displayed an immature and hyporesponsive phenotype [95].
In a murine model of osteoarthritis, an early accumulation of NK cells and neutrophils was observed in the synovium and was associated with a worst disease progression. In this context, neutrophils expressing CXCL10 were responsible for CXCR3-mediated NK cell activation and recruitment in the inflamed joint [96].
On the other hand, in vitro experiments revealed that human stimulated NK cells were able to prolong neutrophil survival inhibiting apoptosis, favor neutrophil activation, in terms of ROS production and phagocytic activity, and mediate the upregulation of activation markers [97, 98]. NK cell-produced IFNγ, GM-CSF and TNFα were responsible for the enhanced neutrophil survival and activation, as shown by increased expression of activation markers (CD11b, CD69 and CD64 up-regulation, and CD62L shedding) [97, 98]. In agreement, NK cells were shown to produce neutrophil chemo-attractants, such as CXCL8, CCL3, CCL4 and CCL5 [99, 100]. In contrast with these studies, it was reported that NK cells induced neutrophil apoptosis through NKp46 and Fas pathway [101]. Whether human NK cells have the ability to regulate neutrophils in pathologies characterized by a relevant infiltration of both cell types remains to be elucidated. NK cell-mediated regulation of neutrophil function in the mouse has been mostly characterized in NK cell-depleted mice. However, controversial results have been reported, possibly because of the use of different models of disease and NK cell depletion, and because of the contribution of other cell types, as carefully reviewed by Cassatella M. [83]. In the context of cancer, it was recently reported in a sarcoma transplantable model that NK cells regulated neutrophil functions via IFNγ. Upon NK cell depletion, neutrophils produced increased levels of VEGF-A, therefore promoting angiogenesis and tumor progression [102].
IL-18 as a central player in NK cell-phagocyte crosstalk
IL-18 was first described as “interferon γ (IFNγ)-inducing factor”. IL-18 is a member of the IL-1 family, produced as an immature form and requiring caspase-1-mediated cleavage to gain bioactivity [103]. IL-18 is a key cytokine implicated in innate and adaptive type 1 responses and plays a crucial role in the interplay between macrophages/DCs and NK cells [103].
In this regard, in vitro M-CSF-derived M0 and M2 macrophages express a membrane bound form of IL-18, which can be released as a soluble form (sIL-18) upon stimulation with LPS. The release of sIL-18 was shown to be dependent on a protease-mediated shedding of the membrane-bound protein [38]. Macrophage-derived IL-18 promoted NK cell activation and CCR7 expression and therefore migration towards lymph nodes (Figure 2). Interestingly, endotoxin tolerant macrophages, which are generated with chronic exposure to TLR ligands, lacked the expression of mIL-18 and did not release relevant amounts of sIL-18, being therefore unable to activate NK cells [38].
Recently, it was elegantly shown in a tumor model that lymph node-resident NK cells are activated by DCs within the lymph node, upon LPS exposure [40]. DC-activated NK cells are the ones that preferentially egress the lymph node, then reach the tumor site and exert anti-tumor effector functions. Interestingly, two-photon microscopy analysis revealed that prolonged interactions occurred between NK cells and DCs in the peripheral T-cell area of the lymph node, in response to LPS treatment. IL-18 was previously shown to be produced by activated DCs and be secreted at the immune synapse generated between DCs and NK cells. The authors demonstrated that LPS-activated DCs in turn activate NK cells through IL-18, which requires cell-to-cell proximity and the formation of a proper and stable interaction to exert its function [40] (Figure 2).
In line with this findings, we reported that NK cells deficient of IL-1R8, a negative regulator of the IL-1 receptor and TLR family members [104], display enhanced maturation and effector functions, in terms of IFNγ production and cytotoxicity in tumor and viral infection models [105]. The increased NK cell differentiation and activation observed in absence of IL-1R8 was dependent on the IL-18 pathway, both in basal levels and in tumor models. Co-culture experiments of NK cells and CpG- or LPS-primed bone marrow-derived DCs revealed that NK cell activation was mainly dependent on IL-18 in both IL-1R8-competent and deficient conditions (Figure 2). Moreover, IL-1R8-deficient NK cell phenotype after co-culture was abolished upon IL-18 neutralization. Importantly, IL-1R8-deficient NK cells were protective in a model of sarcoma-derived lung metastases and colorectal cancer-derived liver metastases and the phenotype was abolished upon neutralization or genetic deletion of IL-18 [105]. Moreover, IL-1R8-deficiency unleashed NK cell-mediated resistance against MCMV [105].
Collectively, these evidences highlight the crucial contribution of IL-18 in the regulation of NK cell activation in the interplay with macrophages and DCs.
Conclusions
NK cells are innate lymphoid cells with cytotoxic potential against cancer or virally infected cells. Engagement of various activating and inhibitory receptors on the NK cell with ligands present on the target cell surface, initiates balanced signalling pathways leading to NK cell function or tolerance. In addition, NK cells engage bidirectional interactions with other leukocytes, including macrophages, DCs and neutrophils, which affect both cell types. Macrophage-NK cell crosstalk is an important component of the immune response against microbes and cancer. In particular, in type 1-oriented immune responses, NK cells amplify both innate and adaptive responses, as a result of their interaction with M1-polarized macrophages. Although NK cells are spontaneously cytotoxic innate lymphocytes, the interaction with DCs and trans-presented cytokines has been identified as a crucial mechanism leading to NK cell priming and full activation. Similarly, the interaction between NK cells and neutrophils through soluble mediators and adhesion molecules, influences NK cell maturation and responsiveness, as well as neutrophil survival. In addition to IL-12 and IL-15, IL-18 is emerging as a key myeloid cell-derived factor involved in the activation of NK cells. IL-18 activity is tightly regulated by IL-1R8, a negative regulator of the IL-1 receptor family, acting as a novel checkpoint of the anti-viral and anti-tumor functions of NK cells, both against primary liver tumors and metastasis. In a translational perspective, these bidirectional interactions with phagocytes, myeloid-derived factors and their regulation must be taken into account to fully exploit the potential of NK cells to restrain primary cancer and metastasis.
Acknowledgments
The contribution of the European Commission (ERC project PHII-669415), Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universitá e della Ricerca (MIUR) (project PRIN 2015YYKPNN), Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC IG 19014 to AM and AIRC 5x1000 9962 and 21147 to AM, AS, LM), CARIPLO, and the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata, RF-2013-02355470 to CG) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1.Kiessling R, Klein E, Wigzell H. "Natural" killer cells in the mouse. I. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells. Specificity and distribution according to genotype. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Feb;5:112–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kiessling R, Klein E, Pross H, Wigzell H. "Natural" killer cells in the mouse. II. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells. Characteristics of the killer cell. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Feb;5:117–21. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, et al. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science. 2011 Jan 7;331:44–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1198687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vivier E, Tomasello E, Baratin M, Walzer T, Ugolini S. Functions of natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2008 May;9:503–10. doi: 10.1038/ni1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martin-Fontecha A, Thomsen LL, Brett S, et al. Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat Immunol. 2004 Dec;5:1260–5. doi: 10.1038/ni1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Walzer T, Dalod M, Robbins SH, Zitvogel L, Vivier E. Natural-killer cells and dendritic cells: "l'union fait la force". Blood. 2005 Oct 1;106:2252–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Malmberg KJ, Carlsten M, Bjorklund A, Sohlberg E, Bryceson YT, Ljunggren HG. Natural killer cell-mediated immunosurveillance of human cancer. Semin Immunol. 2017 Jun;31:20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stabile H, Fionda C, Gismondi A, Santoni A. Role of Distinct Natural Killer Cell Subsets in Anticancer Response. Front Immunol. 2017;8:293. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Landazuri MO, Silva A, Alvarez J, Herberman RB. Evidence that natural cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity are mediated in humans by the same effector cell populations. J Immunol. 1979 Jul;123:252–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lanier LL. NK cell recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:225–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smith HR, Heusel JW, Mehta IK, et al. Recognition of a virus-encoded ligand by a natural killer cell activation receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 25;99:8826–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092258599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hart OM, Athie-Morales V, O'Connor GM, Gardiner CM. TLR7/8-mediated activation of human NK cells results in accessory cell-dependent IFN-gamma production. J Immunol. 2005 Aug 1;175:1636–42. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gerosa F, Gobbi A, Zorzi P, et al. The reciprocal interaction of NK cells with plasmacytoid or myeloid dendritic cells profoundly affects innate resistance functions. J Immunol. 2005 Jan 15;174:727–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.2.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sivori S, Falco M, Della Chiesa M, et al. CpG and double-stranded RNA trigger human NK cells by Toll-like receptors: induction of cytokine release and cytotoxicity against tumors and dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 6;101:10116–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403744101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vulpis E, Cecere F, Molfetta R, et al. Genotoxic stress modulates the release of exosomes from multiple myeloma cells capable of activating NK cell cytokine production: Role of HSP70/TLR2/NF-kB axis. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1279372. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1279372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moretta A, Bottino C, Vitale M, et al. Activating receptors and coreceptors involved in human natural killer cell-mediated cytolysis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:197–223. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barrow AD, Edeling MA, Trifonov V, et al. Natural Killer Cells Control Tumor Growth by Sensing a Growth Factor. Cell. 2018 Jan 25;172:534–48 e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gaggero S, Bruschi M, Petretto A, et al. Nidogen-1 is a novel extracellular ligand for the NKp44 activating receptor. Oncoimmunology. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1470730. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moretta A, Bottino C, Vitale M, et al. Receptors for HLA class-I molecules in human natural killer cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996;14:619–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parham P. MHC class I molecules and KIRs in human history, health and survival. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 Mar;5:201–14. doi: 10.1038/nri1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yokoyama WM, Plougastel BF. Immune functions encoded by the natural killer gene complex. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003 Apr;3:304–16. doi: 10.1038/nri1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kumar V, McNerney ME. A new self: MHC-class-I-independent natural-killer-cell self-tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 May;5:363–74. doi: 10.1038/nri1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vivier E, Nunes JA, Vely F. Natural killer cell signaling pathways. Science. 2004 Nov 26;306:1517–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1103478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Karre K. NK cells, MHC class I molecules and the missing self. Scand J Immunol. 2002 Mar;55:221–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kadri N, Wagner AK, Ganesan S, et al. Dynamic Regulation of NK Cell Responsiveness. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2016;395:95–114. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Raulet DH, Guerra N. Oncogenic stress sensed by the immune system: role of natural killer cell receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009 Aug;9:568–80. doi: 10.1038/nri2604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Karre K, Ljunggren HG, Piontek G, Kiessling R. Selective rejection of H-2-deficient lymphoma variants suggests alternative immune defence strategy. Nature. 1986 Feb 20-26;319:675–8. doi: 10.1038/319675a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Raulet DH. Missing self recognition and self tolerance of natural killer (NK) cells. Semin Immunol. 2006 Jun;18:145–50. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anfossi N, Andre P, Guia S, et al. Human NK cell education by inhibitory receptors for MHC class I. Immunity. 2006 Aug;25:331–42. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim S, Poursine-Laurent J, Truscott SM, et al. Licensing of natural killer cells by host major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Nature. 2005 Aug 4;436:709–13. doi: 10.1038/nature03847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoglund P, Glas R, Menard C, et al. Beta2-microglobulin-deficient NK cells show increased sensitivity to MHC class I-mediated inhibition, but self tolerance does not depend upon target cell expression of H-2Kb and Db heavy chains. Eur J Immunol. 1998 Jan;28:370–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199801)28:01<370::AID-IMMU370>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zimmer J, Donato L, Hanau D, et al. Activity and phenotype of natural killer cells in peptide transporter (TAP)-deficient patients (type I bare lymphocyte syndrome) J Exp Med. 1998 Jan 5;187:117–22. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liao NS, Bix M, Zijlstra M, Jaenisch R, Raulet D. MHC class I deficiency: susceptibility to natural killer (NK) cells and impaired NK activity. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253:199–202. doi: 10.1126/science.1853205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brodin P, Karre K, Hoglund P. NK cell education: not an on-off switch but a tunable rheostat. Trends Immunol. 2009 Apr;30:143–9. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fauriat C, Ivarsson MA, Ljunggren HG, Malmberg KJ, Michaelsson J. Education of human natural killer cells by activating killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors. Blood. 2010 Feb 11;115:1166–74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-245746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Long EO. Ready for prime time: NK cell priming by dendritic cells. Immunity. 2007 Apr;26:385–7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fehniger TA, Cooper MA, Nuovo GJ, et al. CD56bright natural killer cells are present in human lymph nodes and are activated by T cell-derived IL-2: a potential new link between adaptive and innate immunity. Blood. 2003 Apr 15;101:3052–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bellora F, Castriconi R, Doni A, et al. M-CSF induces the expression of a membrane-bound form of IL-18 in a subset of human monocytes differentiating in vitro toward macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2012 Jun;42:1618–26. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zanoni I, Spreafico R, Bodio C, et al. IL-15 cis presentation is required for optimal NK cell activation in lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammatory conditions. Cell reports. 2013 Sep 26;4:1235–49. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mingozzi F, Spreafico R, Gorletta T, et al. Prolonged contact with dendritic cells turns lymph node-resident NK cells into anti-tumor effectors. EMBO Mol Med. 2016 Sep;8:1039–51. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201506164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mattiola I, Pesant M, Tentorio PF, et al. Priming of Human Resting NK Cells by Autologous M1 Macrophages via the Engagement of IL-1beta, IFN-beta, and IL-15 Pathways. J Immunol. 2015 Sep 15;195:2818–28. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Laouar Y, Sutterwala FS, Gorelik L, Flavell RA. Transforming growth factor-beta controls T helper type 1 cell development through regulation of natural killer cell interferon-gamma. Nat Immunol. 2005 Jun;6:600–7. doi: 10.1038/ni1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Marcenaro E, Della Chiesa M, Bellora F, et al. IL-12 or IL-4prime human NK cells to mediate functionally divergent interactions with dendritic cells or tumors. J Immunol. 2005 Apr 1;174:3992–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.3992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Agaugue S, Marcenaro E, Ferranti B, Moretta L, Moretta A. Human natural killer cells exposed to IL-2, IL-12, IL-18, or IL-4 differently modulate priming of naive T cells by monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood. 2008 Sep 1;112:1776–83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-135871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Michel T, Hentges F, Zimmer J. Consequences of the crosstalk between monocytes/macrophages and natural killer cells. Front Immunol. 2012;3:403. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Locati M, Mantovani A, Sica A. Macrophage activation and polarization as an adaptive component of innate immunity. Adv Immunol. 2013;120:163–84. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-417028-5.00006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mantovani A, Marchesi F, Malesci A, Laghi L, Allavena P. Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul;14:399–416. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012 Mar;122:787–95. doi: 10.1172/JCI59643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nedvetzki S, Sowinski S, Eagle RA, et al. Reciprocal regulation of human natural killer cells and macrophages associated with distinct immune synapses. Blood. 2007 May 1;109:3776–85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-052977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Basu S, Eriksson M, Pioli PA, et al. Human uterine NK cells interact with uterine macrophages via NKG2D upon stimulation with PAMPs. Am J Rep Immunol. 2009 Jan;61:52–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00661.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Atochina O, Harn D. LNFPIII/LeX-stimulated macrophages activate natural killer cells via CD40-CD40L interaction. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Sep;12:1041–9. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1041-1049.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bellora F, Castriconi R, Dondero A, et al. The interaction of human natural killer cells with either unpolarized or polarized macrophages results in different functional outcomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 14;107:21659–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007654108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baratin M, Roetynck S, Lepolard C, et al. Natural killer cell and macrophage cooperation in MyD88-dependent innate responses to Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 11;102:14747–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507355102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aranha FC, Ribeiro U, Jr, Basse P, Corbett CE, Laurenti MD. Interleukin-2-activated natural killer cells may have a direct role in the control of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis promastigote and macrophage infection. Scand J Immunol. 2005 Oct;62:334–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2005.01681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Romo N, Magri G, Muntasell A, et al. Natural killer cell-mediated response to human cytomegalovirus-infected macrophages is modulated by their functional polarization. J Leukoc Biol. 2011 Oct;90:717–26. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0311171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lapaque N, Walzer T, Meresse S, Vivier E, Trowsdale J. Interactions between human NK cells and macrophages in response to Salmonella infection. J Immunol. 2009 Apr 1;182:4339–48. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Klezovich-Benard M, Corre JP, Jusforgues-Saklani H, et al. Mechanisms of NK cell-macrophage Bacillus anthracis crosstalk: a balance between stimulation by spores and differential disruption by toxins. PLoS Pathog. 2012 Jan;8:e1002481. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Elhaik-Goldman S, Kafka D, Yossef R, et al. The natural cytotoxicity receptor 1 contribution to early clearance of Streptococcus pneumoniae and to natural killer-macrophage cross talk. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Denis M, Keen DL, Parlane NA, Storset AK, Buddle BM. Bovine natural killer cells restrict the replication of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine macrophages and enhance IL-12 release by infected macrophages. Tuberculosis. 2007 Jan;87:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Brill KJ, Li Q, Larkin R, et al. Human natural killer cells mediate killing of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv via granule-independent mechanisms. Infect Immun. 2001 Mar;69:1755–65. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1755-1765.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Haller D, Serrant P, Granato D, Schiffrin EJ, Blum S. Activation of human NK cells by staphylococci and lactobacilli requires cell contact-dependent costimulation by autologous monocytes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 May;9:649–57. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.9.3.649-657.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nakajima H, Cella M, Langen H, Friedlein A, Colonna M. Activating interactions in human NK cell recognition: the role of 2B4-CD48. Eur J Immunol. 1999 May;29:1676–83. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199905)29:05<1676::AID-IMMU1676>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lucas M, Schachterle W, Oberle K, Aichele P, Diefenbach A. Dendritic cells prime natural killer cells by trans-presenting interleukin 15. Immunity. 2007 Apr;26:503–17. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.van de Wetering D, de Paus RA, van Dissel JT, van de Vosse E. Salmonella induced IL-23 and IL-1beta allow for IL-12 production by monocytes and Mphi1 through induction of IFN-gamma in CD56NK/NK-like T cells. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 21;4:e8396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Biswas SK, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol. 2010 Oct;11:889–96. doi: 10.1038/ni.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bellora F, Castriconi R, Dondero A, et al. TLR activation of tumor-associated macrophages from ovarian cancer patients triggers cytolytic activity of NK cells. Eur J Immunol. 2014 Jun;44:1814–22. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bordignon C, Villa F, Allavena P, et al. Inhibition of natural killer activity by human bronchoalveolar macrophages. J Immunol. 1982 Aug;129:587–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Vari F, Arpon D, Keane C, et al. Immune evasion via PD-1/PD-L1 on NK cells and monocyte/macrophages is more prominent in Hodgkin lymphoma than DLBCL. Blood. 2018 Apr 19;131:1809–19. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-796342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pesce S, Greppi M, Tabellini G, et al. Identification of a subset of human natural killer cells expressing high levels of programmed death 1: A phenotypic and functional characterization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139:335–46 e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Herberman RB, Holden HT. Natural cell-mediated immunity. Adv Cancer Res. 1978;27:305–77. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60936-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Fernandez NC, Lozier A, Flament C, et al. Dendritic cells directly trigger NK cell functions: cross-talk relevant in innate anti-tumor immune responses in vivo. Nat Med. 1999 Apr;5:405–11. doi: 10.1038/7403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Koka R, Burkett P, Chien M, Chai S, Boone DL, Ma A. Cutting edge: murine dendritic cells require IL-15R alpha to prime NK cells. J Immunol. 2004 Sep 15;173:3594–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.3594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Moretta A. Natural killer cells and dendritic cells: rendezvous in abused tissues. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Dec;2:957–64. doi: 10.1038/nri956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Andrews DM, Scalzo AA, Yokoyama WM, Smyth MJ, Degli-Esposti MA. Functional interactions between dendritic cells and NK cells during viral infection. Nat Immunol. 2003 Feb;4:175–81. doi: 10.1038/ni880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vogel K, Thomann S, Vogel B, Schuster P, Schmidt B. Both plasmacytoid dendritic cells and monocytes stimulate natural killer cells early during human herpes simplex virus type 1 infections. Immunology. 2014 Dec;143:588–600. doi: 10.1111/imm.12337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kassim SH, Rajasagi NK, Ritz BW, et al. Dendritic cells are required for optimal activation of natural killer functions following primary infection with herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol. 2009 Apr;83:3175–86. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01907-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ma A, Koka R, Burkett P. Diverse functions of IL-2, IL-15, and IL-7 in lymphoid homeostasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:657–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Huntington ND, Legrand N, Alves NL, et al. IL-15 trans-presentation promotes human NK cell development and differentiation in vivo. J Exp Med. 2009 Jan 16;206:25–34. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Granucci F, Zanoni I, Pavelka N, et al. A contribution of mouse dendritic cell-derived IL-2 for NK cell activation. J Exp Med. 2004 Aug 2;200:287–95. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nguyen KB, Salazar-Mather TP, Dalod MY, et al. Coordinated and distinct roles for IFN-alpha beta, IL-12, and IL-15 regulation of NK cell responses to viral infection. J Immunol. 2002 Oct 15;169:4279–87. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tasca S, Tambussi G, Nozza S, et al. Escape of monocyte-derived dendritic cells of HIV-1 infected individuals from natural killer cell-mediated lysis. AIDS. 2003 Nov 7;17:2291–8. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200311070-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mavilio D, Lombardo G, Kinter A, et al. Characterization of the defective interaction between a subset of natural killer cells and dendritic cells in HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 2006 Oct 2;203:2339–50. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Costantini C, Cassatella MA. The defensive alliance between neutrophils and NK cells as a novel arm of innate immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2011 Feb;89:221–33. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0510250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gabrilovich DI, Shepeleva GK, Serebrovskaya LV, Avdeeva LA, Pokrovsky VV. Modification of lymphocyte and monocyte functional activity by polymorphonuclear neutrophils in HIV infection. Scand J Immunol. 1993 Apr;37:459–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1993.tb03319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Shau HY, Golub SH. Inhibition of lymphokine-activated killer- and natural killer-mediated cytotoxicities by neutrophils. J Immunol. 1989 Aug 1;143:1066–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shau HY, Kim A. Suppression of lymphokine-activated killer induction by neutrophils. J Immunol. 1988 Dec 15;141:4395–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.el-Hag A, Clark RA. Immunosuppression by activated human neutrophils. Dependence on the myeloperoxidase system. J Immunol. 1987 Oct 1;139:2406–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Seaman WE, Gindhart TD, Blackman MA, Dalal B, Talal N, Werb Z. Suppression of natural killing in vitro by monocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes: requirement for reactive metabolites of oxygen. J Clin Invest. 1982 Apr;69:876–88. doi: 10.1172/JCI110527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Harlin H, Hanson M, Johansson CC, et al. The CD16- CD56(bright) NK cell subset is resistant to reactive oxygen species produced by activated granulocytes and has higher antioxidative capacity than the CD16+ CD56(dim) subset. J Immunol. 2007 Oct 1;179:4513–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lindemann RA, Lala A, Miyasaki KT. The in vitro effect of human polymorphonuclear leukocyte azurophil granule components on natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1994 Jun;9:186–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1994.tb00057.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Shau H, Kim A, Golub SH. Modulation of natural killer and lymphokine-activated killer cell cytotoxicity by lactoferrin. J Leukoc Biol. 1992 Apr;51:343–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Emoto M, Miyamoto M, Emoto Y, et al. Highly biased type 1 immune responses in mice deficient in LFA-1 in Listeria monocytogenes infection are caused by elevated IL-12 production by granulocytes. J Immunol. 2003 Oct 15;171:3970–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.3970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Riise RE, Bernson E, Aurelius J, et al. TLR-Stimulated Neutrophils Instruct NK Cells To Trigger Dendritic Cell Maturation and Promote Adaptive T Cell Responses. J Immunol. 2015 Aug 1;195:1121–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Costantini C, Calzetti F, Perbellini O, et al. Human neutrophils interact with both 6-sulfo LacNAc+ DC and NK cells to amplify NK-derived IFN{gamma}: role of CD18, ICAM-1, and ICAM-3. Blood. 2011 Feb 3;117:1677–86. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-287243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jaeger BN, Donadieu J, Cognet C, et al. Neutrophil depletion impairs natural killer cell maturation, function, and homeostasis. J Exp Med. 2012 Mar 12;209:565–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Benigni G, Dimitrova P, Antonangeli F, et al. CXCR3/CXCL10 Axis Regulates Neutrophil-NK Cell Cross-Talk Determining the Severity of Experimental Osteoarthritis. J Immunol. 2017 Mar 1;198:2115–24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Costantini C, Micheletti A, Calzetti F, Perbellini O, Pizzolo G, Cassatella MA. Neutrophil activation and survival are modulated by interaction with NK cells. Int Immunol. 2010 Oct;22:827–38. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Bhatnagar N, Hong HS, Krishnaswamy JK, et al. Cytokine-activated NK cells inhibit PMN apoptosis and preserve their functional capacity. Blood. 2010 Aug 26;116:1308–16. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hartl D, Krauss-Etschmann S, Koller B, et al. Infiltrated neutrophils acquire novel chemokine receptor expression and chemokine responsiveness in chronic inflammatory lung diseases. J Immunol. 2008 Dec 1;181:8053–67. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.8053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Robertson MJ. Role of chemokines in the biology of natural killer cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2002 Feb;71:173–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Thoren FB, Riise RE, Ousback J, et al. Human NK Cells induce neutrophil apoptosis via an NKp46- and Fas-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2012 Feb 15;188:1668–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ogura K, Sato-Matsushita M, Yamamoto S, et al. NK Cells Control Tumor-Promoting Function of Neutrophils in Mice. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 Jan 23; doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Garlanda C, Dinarello CA, Mantovani A. The interleukin-1 family: back to the future. Immunity. 2013 Dec 12;39:1003–18. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Molgora M, Barajon I, Mantovani A, Garlanda C. Regulatory Role of IL-1R8 in Immunity and Disease. Front Immunol. 2016;7:149. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Molgora M, Bonavita E, Ponzetta A, et al. IL-1R8 is a checkpoint in NK cells regulating anti-tumour and anti-viral activity. Nature. 2017 Nov 2;551:110–4. doi: 10.1038/nature24293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



