Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Perinatol. 2019 Mar 30;46(2):327–347. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.02.012

Drugs for the Prevention and Treatment of Sepsis in the Newborn

Sagori Mukhopadhyay 1,2,3, Kelly C Wade 1,2,3, Karen M Puopolo 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC6485941  NIHMSID: NIHMS1521506  PMID: 31010563

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial medication use is exceedingly common among neeonates. Perinatal antibiotic exposure includes in-utero exposure to maternal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), whether for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization or concern for maternal intraamniotic infection (IAI), as well as exposure to empiric antibiotics given directly to the neonate for risk of early-onset sepsis (EOS). These combined indications mean that ~30-35% of term neonates in United States are exposed to antibiotics in the immediate perinatal period. Among extremely preterm neonates cared for in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), antimicrobial exposure is even higher averaging ~80% for very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates1. Antibiotics comprise 3 of the 4 most commonly-prescribed medications in the NICU2. The frequency of antimicrobial administration and the critical, life-saving role these medications play in neonatal care, demand that the neonatal provider have detailed and current knowledge of their mode of action, spectrum of action, and potential toxicities. Over the last two decades, reports of highly resistant ‘superbugs’ have called attention to inappropriate prescribing practices and prompted closer monitoring of resistance patterns. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in the neonatal population have described dosing regimens that are specific to the unique physiology of neonates and can allow safer and more efficacious dosing. In this review, we will discuss parenteral antibiotics most commonly used in the management of perinatal bacterial infections2,3.

ANTIMICROBIAL PHARMACOLOGY

PK considerations of using antimicrobials in neonates:

The effect of an antimicrobial medication on the neonate (pharmacodynamic effect, PD) and the effect of the neonate’s physiology on drug exposures (PK) depend on multiple factors that are distinct in neonates compared to older children and adults. Dynamic organ development, changing body composition, evolving gene/enzyme expression, and co-morbid conditions (e.g. prematurity) can all impact drug exposure, efficacy and toxicity. A paucity of neonatal-specific studies contributes to the significant variation in dose recommendations characteristic of different formulary sources4. Standard regimens are often derived from older studies that are limited by lower representation of the extremely preterm neonate, use of intramuscular administration, small sample sizes, and extrapolation from older populations5. A study of NICU dosing regimens across 89 NICUs in 21 countries found significant variability across sites, with a tendency to use higher than recommended doses of penicillins and wide variability in vancomycin use6. The authors attributed this variability to the scarcity of neonatal studies, discrepancies between standard recommendations and changes derived from newer PK studies, and difficulties in the dissemination of available information.

Dosing determinations for antimicrobials are based on achieving drug concentrations that are above the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of a pathogen, the level at which an antimicrobial inhibits growth of the organism in vitro. While a critical determinant of antimicrobial efficacy is attaining and maintaining in vivo drug concentrations above the infecting pathogen’s MIC, antimicrobials differ in the exposure metrics associated with pathogen killing. Bacterial killing can depend on: 1) the peak concentration (Cmax) relative to the MIC (concentration-dependent killing); 2) how long the serum level stays above the MIC (time-dependent killing); or 3) a combination of factors estimated by the total drug exposure which is represented by the area under the concentration curve for a given dose (AUC-dependent killing). Examples of drugs with each characteristic and its implication for dosing are found in Table 17. Initial concentrations depend on the volume of distribution of the drug. Preterm infants may need a higher dose to achieve the same concentration given their higher water content and larger volume of distribution. However, drug elimination is also affected by prematurity8. Most antimicrobials used for early infection depend on the kidneys for clearance (with the exception of nafcillin, cleared by the liver). Renal clearance is lower after birth and increases in the first 1-2 weeks of life. Neonates less than 32-34 weeks gestation often have significantly lower renal clearance than neonates born at older gestation. While renal clearance increases with postnatal age, it often remains lower than term counterparts during their NICU stay. Thus, PK studies in neonates often result in altered dosing schedules based on gestational age, postnatal age, and/or postmenstrual age to maintain similar drug exposure across different age groups.

Table 1:

Pharmacodynamic considerations when dosing antimicrobials

Killing pattern Antimicrobial Drug Goal of Dosing PK/PD parameter
Concentration-dependent killing Aminoglycosides Maximize Peak (Cmax) High dose, long dosing interval Cmax/MIC
Time-dependent killing Penicillins
Carbapenams
Cephalosporins
Maximize duration of exposure above MIC Short dosing interval and long infusion times % time >MIC
AUC-dependent killing Vancomycin
Fluconazole
Maximize Cmax and duration of exposure above MIC. High dose and short interval AUC24/MIC

Adapted from Table 37-3, Remington and Klein’s Infectious Disease of the Fetus and Newborn. 8th edition. Elsevier: Philadelphia. Saunders; 2016; with permission.

Mechanisms of antibiotic action and resistance:

Parenteral antibiotics commonly used in neonates have three primary mechanisms of action: 1) disruption of the bacterial cell wall (beta lactams and vancomycin inhibit peptidoglycan linking in bacterial cell wall); 2) inhibition of protein synthesis (aminoglycosides and macrolides bind to the 30s ribosomal subunit and clindamycin to the 50s ribosomal subunit, inhibiting translation); and 3) inhibition of nucleic acid function (metronidazole disrupts DNA structure and rifampin inhibits RNA formation required for DNA synthesis)9. Although fluoroquinolones inhibit DNA replication and sulfonamides disrupt bacterial metabolic pathways, these antibiotics are rarely used in neonates.

Bacterial susceptibility to an antibiotic usually results from interference with a pathway essential for the organism’s growth and survival. Intrinsic resistance occurs when the organism’s inherent genotype and/or phenotype renders an antibiotic ineffective. Enterococci are intrinsically resistant to cephalosporins as penicillin-binding protein does not bind to cephalosporins. Gram-negative organisms are resistant to vancomycin because the large size of the molecule prevents penetration through the outer lipid membrane. Similarly, the thick gram-positive cell wall confers intrinsic resistance to aminoglycosides by slowing entry into the intracytoplasmic site of action. Acquired resistance can occur from non-genetic mechanisms (e.g. non-dividing bacteria), chromosomal mutation, or horizontal acquisition via mobile genetic elements (e.g. transposons, plasmids). Beyond the natural tendency of organisms to acquire resistance, antimicrobial use exerts selection pressures for proliferation of resistant strains10. Various medical organizations have all recognized that judicious use of antibiotics is needed to prevent the spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms11,12. Single-center and time-trend studies reveal increasing antimicrobial resistance in neonatal late-onset infections and increasing resistance among GBS and E.coli isolates in early-onset infections13-17. The known resistance patterns of common pathogens combined with local antibiograms can inform antibiotic choices of empiric and definitive therapy (Table 2).

Table 2.

Antibiotics used for intrapartum prophylaxis

Antibiotic Intrapartum Indication Placental Kinetics
Penicillin G27 Recommended for GBS prophylaxis Cord blood levels > MIC for GBS <1 hour after administration
Ampicillin25,26,28,29 Recommended for GBS prophylaxis
  • Cord blood levels >MIC for GBS with 30 minutes of maternal administration

  • Rapid (<1 hour after maternal dose) transfer into amniotic fluid

  • Neonatal serum levels >MIC for GBS at 4 hours of age, if dose administered to mother >15 minutes prior to delivery

Cefazolin30-32 Recommended for GBS prophylaxis in case of mild maternal penicillin allergy (non-anaphylaxis)
  • Cord blood levels >MIC GBS within 20 minutes of maternal administration

Clindamycin33-35 Recommended for GBS prophylaxis in case of serious maternal penicillin allergy and GBS isolate sensitive to clindamycin
  • Cord blood levels ~50% of maternal levels and above MIC for GBS

  • Poor transfer into amniotic fluid

Vancomycin40,41 Recommended for GBS prophylaxis in case of maternal serious penicillin allergy and GBS isolate resistant to erythromycin or clindamycin
  • Ex vivo placental studies predict cord blood levels < 10% of maternal levels.

  • Study of 13 women demonstrated cord blood levels >MIC for GBS by 30 minutes after 60-90 minute maternal infusion completed

Ampicillin and gentamicin 34,42 Recommended when there is concern for intrapartum maternal intraamniotic infection
  • Gentamicin reaches lower levels in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women

  • Cord blood levels ~40% of maternal levels

  • Poor transfer into amniotic fluid

Cefazolin and gentamicin Recommended when there is concern for intrapartum maternal intraamniotic infection, in case of mild maternal penicillin allergy
Vancomycin and gentamicin Recommended when there is concern for intrapartum maternal intraamniotic infection, in case of serious maternal penicillin allergy

Ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, cefotetan and ertapenem are alternative regimens for empiric treatment of maternal intraamniotic infection.

Synergy:

Combining beta-lactams with aminoglycosides to increase bactericidal potential occurs frequently in neonates. Synergy is defined as a combination of antimicrobials demonstrating greater activity (greater than 2 log bactericidal activity) against an organism compared to either used alone18. Synergy can compensate for some forms of antimicrobial resistance. For example, synergy between cell-wall active beta-lactams and aminoglycosides can overcome intrinsic resistance by allowing the aminoglycoside to penetrate the cell wall19,20. Synergism is used for highly invasive and difficult to sterilize GBS or enterococcal infections such as endocarditis, meningitis or infections associated with medical devices. Although both GBS and enterococci can acquire modes of resistance to aminoglycosides which will render synergy ineffective22, some experts recommend treating GBS meningitis with a beta-lactam antibiotic and gentamicin until CSF sterility is achieved23 and others recommend using both drugs for the first 5 days of therapy before completing treatment with a beta-lactam alone24. However, clinical demonstration of in vitro synergy has been inconsistent and no advantage was found for using a beta-lactam with aminoglycoside versus using beta-lactams alone in a meta-analysis of 69 trials of adult sepsis, with a higher incidence of renal injury with combination therapy21.

INTRAPARTUM ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS

Prevention of perinatal infection with Group B Streptococcus:

Transplacental fetal exposure to intrapartum maternally-administered antibiotics is the most common form of perinatal antibiotic treatment. IAP to prevent early-onset GBS disease (GBS EOD) is the primary indication for perinatal antibiotic administration. GBS emerged as an important cause of EOS in the United States in the 1970s and subsequent studies identified maternal gastrointestinal and genitourinary colonization with GBS as the primary risk factor for GBS-specific EOS. The high rate of vertical transmission (~50%) and subsequent infection (~1% of infants born to colonized mothers become infected) and the severity of GBS-associated morbidity and mortality prompted the search for public health approaches to disease prevention. Current recommendations focus on universal antenatal screening of pregnant women for GBS colonization using vaginal-rectal cultures obtained at 35-37 weeks gestation or in the event of preterm labor or preterm rupture of membranes43. Antibiotics used for IAP include penicillin G, ampicillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin (Table 2). IAP is hypothesized to prevent neonatal GBS disease in three ways: 1) by temporarily decreasing maternal colonization burden; 2) by preventing surface and mucus membrane colonization of the fetus/neonate; and 3) by reaching the MIC of the antibiotic for killing GBS25,26.

Penicillin G and Ampicillin:

Penicillin G and ampicillin are beta-lactam antibiotics that differ in structure by a single amino group. These antibiotics inhibit bacterial cell synthesis and are bactericidal. Although penicillin G is metabolized in the liver, it is largely excreted unchanged in urine. GBS remains susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics with ampicillin and penicillin G best studied for their role as GBS IAP. Maternally-administered penicillin G readily crosses the placenta, reaches cord blood peak levels by one hour, and rapidly declines by 4 hours reflecting elimination of the antibiotic by the fetal kidney into amniotic fluid27. Both peak and nadir cord blood levels are above the GBS MIC when administered to the mother every 4 hours. Ampicillin has been detected in cord blood within 30 minutes and in amniotic fluid within 45 minutes of maternal administration25. One study measured ampicillin levels in 115 newborns after maternal IAP and detected levels above the GBS MIC at 4 hours of age when maternal dosing occurred at least 15 minutes prior to delivery28. Ampicillin IAP has been shown to decrease maternal vaginal colonization within 2 hours of administration and to prevent neonatal surface colonization in 97-100% of cases if IAP was given at least 4 hours prior to delivery26,29.

Cefazolin:

cefazolin is a first-generation cephalosporin. Like ampicillin and penicillin, cefazolin inhibits cell-wall synthesis and is bactericidal. The drug is recommended for GBS IAP for women with non-anaphylaxis penicillin allergy. Cefazolin rapidly crosses the placenta and is detected in cord blood a levels above the GBS MIC with 20 minutes after maternal administration30,31. One study included 25 women administered cefazolin 20 minutes to 7 hours prior to planned Cesarean section delivery. Cord blood and amniotic fluid levels of cefazolin above the GBS MIC were detected in virtually all cases regardless of the timing relative to delivery32.

Clindamycin:

Clindamycin is a synthetic lincosamide antibiotic derivative recommended for IAP among women with serious (anaphylaxis) penicillin allergy if the colonizing GBS isolate is sensitive. Clindamycin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis and is considered bacteriostatic. Few data inform the potential effectiveness of clindamycin as GBS IAP. One study of GBS-positive women found that vaginal cultures had no viable GBS if clindamycin was administered 4 hours prior to delivery33. In another study, peak cord blood levels of clindamycin occurred ~20 minutes after the maternal dose was given, but levels were only ~50% of simultaneous maternal levels34. Clindamycin was not detected in amniotic fluid in 9 specimens obtained 30-90 minutes after maternal dose. Clindamycin is metabolized by the liver; one study of oral maternally-administered clindamycin found the drug concentrates in fetal liver but accumulates in amniotic fluid only after multiple maternal doses35.

GBS are increasingly resistant to clindamycin as well as to macrolide antibiotics such as erythromycin. The same genetic elements responsible for clindamycin resistance also cause erythromycin resistance36. Antibiotic sensitivity testing for GBS should include erythromycin and clindamycin; strains identified as erythromycin-resistant but clindamycin-sensitive should also be assessed by D-test to identify inducible clindamycin resistance. Clindamycin resistance was identified in 12.7% of ~3500 tested GBS isolates collected in 4 states from 1998-2003, with an increasing trend over time37. Erythromycin resistance was also identified in 1/3 of all GBS isolates and is no longer recommended for GBS IAP. One report from Canada in 2010-2011 found 26.6% of 158 GBS isolates resistant38 while another study in upstate New York found resistance in 38.4% of 688 GBS isolates39. The bacteriostatic mechanism of antimicrobial action, incomplete placental transfer and unclear fetal/neonatal PK suggest that clindamycin may not provide the same level of protection from GBS infection as provided by beta-lactam antibiotic IAP, even with susceptible isolates.

Vancomycin.

GBS are universally sensitive to vancomycin, a bactericidal glycopeptide antibiotic that inhibits cell wall synthesis of gram-positive bacteria. Vancomycin is recommended for GBS IAP in women with serious (anaphylaxis) penicillin allergy if colonized with clindamycin-resistant GBS. Ex vivo studies with placental lobules suggest that vancomycin crosses the placental poorly, with fetal-side blood levels only ~10% of maternal levels40. In contrast, a study of 13 women undergoing elective Cesarean section delivery found that cord blood levels of vancomycin above the GBS MIC could be achieved within 30 minutes of maternal drug administration41. No data was reported in this study concerning amniotic fluid or newborn blood levels of vancomycin after birth. As with clindamycin, there is insufficient evidence to inform the efficacy of vancomycin for prevention of neonatal GBS disease.

Prevention of all-bacterial cause EOS:

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends the use of IAP for the prevention of neonatal EOS when there is concern for suspected or confirmed maternal IAI. ACOG guidance defines a confirmed diagnosis of IAI as that made by amniotic fluid Gram stain and/or culture or by placental histopathology. Suspected IAI is defined by maternal intrapartum fever (either a single maternal intrapartum temperature ≥39.0°C or persistent temperature of 38.0°C–38.9°C) in combination with maternal leukocytosis, purulent cervical drainage and/or fetal tachycardia. In addition, current ACOG guidance is for the administration of IAP when otherwise unexplained maternal fever occurs in isolation. Recommended intrapartum antibiotic regimens for treatment of confirmed or suspected IAI or isolated fever include ampicillin, cefazolin, clindamycin or vancomycin, each in combination with gentamicin42.

ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY FOR NEONATAL EARLY-ONSET SEPSIS

Early-onset sepsis:

Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is defined as blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture-confirmed infection that occurs 0-6 days after birth43. This is the primary indication for antibiotic use in the immediate neonatal period. Antibacterial choice for empiric therapy is based on the population epidemiology of EOS, while definitive therapy is tailored to the specific organism cultured and to the reported antimicrobial susceptibilities. The two most frequent EOS pathogens in United States are GBS (0.22 cases per 1000 live births) and E. coli (0.18 cases per 1000 live births)44. The proportionate contribution of E. coli to EOS has increased with decreasing incidence of early-onset GBS disease such that it is the most common pathogen in some areas17,44 and in the VLBW population45. Fungal species (most commonly Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis) account for <1% of EOS cases and occur primarily among VLBW infants46; therapy for fungal EOS will not be addressed in this review. EOS remains a significant cause of neonatal morbidity; mortality is unusual (<2%) among infected term infants but is as high as 30-50% among neonates born <29 weeks gestation47,48.

Choice of empiric therapy for EOS:

The most frequent choice for empiric EOS therapy is a beta-lactam such as ampicillin plus gentamicin1,3. This combination provides adequate coverage for most common gram-positive pathogens including GBS, viridans streptococci, Enterococcus sp. and Listeria monocytogenes and as well as E. coli and other gram-negative bacteria. However, the evolving resistance patterns in E. coli have led to concerns about the adequacy of current empiric choices17. In a multi-state surveillance report of EOS cases, 78% of the E. coli isolates were resistant to ampicillin and 10% resistant to gentamicin44. Additionally, 24/25 cases of gentamicin-resistant strains were also resistant to ampicillin. A single center report from Spain similarly found that among 65 E. coli isolates over 21 years, 75% were resistant to ampicillin and 12% to gentamicin17.

Few randomized trials have compared neonatal empiric regimens and a 2004 Cochrane review found insufficient studies to determine an optimal regimen49. An open-label, cluster-randomized trial among 283 neonates with suspected EOS compared regimens of gentamicin combined with either ampicillin or penicillin and found no difference in treatment failure. A trend to increased all-cause mortality was observed among infants born <26 weeks gestation treated with penicillin, unexplained by early mortality or later colonization50,51. Most other studies have been observational in design. The NeonIN prospective surveillance study across multiple units in the United Kingdom over a 10-year period found that the combination of penicillin or aminopenicillin and an aminoglycoside provided 93–96% coverage with better performance of ampicillin (vs. penicillin) in the preterm population3. In a cohort of 258 neonates with E. coli bacteremia, 123 (48%) cases had ampicillin-resistant isolates. Neonates with ampicillin-resistant E. coli were more likely to be born to mothers treated with antenatal antibiotics but were otherwise similar. There were no overall difference in mortality and no impact of the composition of the empiric antibiotic regimen on 30-day mortality or duration of bacteremia52.

While third generation cephalosporin susceptibility remains high in E. coli, multiple factors argue against use of cephalosporins as initial empiric therapy. A study investigating the odds of neonatal mortality in 24,111 episodes of empiric ampicillin/cefotaxime use with 104,803 episodes of empiric ampicillin/gentamicin use in the first 21 days of life, found a significant increased odds of mortality with cefotaxime when controlling for multiple patient level characteristics53. Other studies have associated cephalosporin use with increased risk of subsequent fungal infection54 and selection of highly resistant organisms10. Cefotaxime lacks intrinsic activity against other common early pathogens such as Listeria and Enterococcus. Additionally, although ~80% of VLBW infants are started on empiric therapy1, only ~5% will have an E. coli infection55. The majority of these isolates will be sensitive to gentamicin. Thus, ampicillin and gentamicin remains the optimal empiric choice, with broader spectrum use limited to high-risk infants with poor response or when preliminary microbiologic results identify gram-negative organisms.

Antibiotics used in management of EOS:

In the following sections we describe the common antimicrobials used for EOS in the NICU and factors that determine use. Specific dose recommendations can be found in available formularies and the AAP Red Book®.

Ampicillin:

As noted above, ampicillin is a semi-synthetic formulation derived from penicillin where the extra amino groups increases its penetration in gram-negative cell membrane, broadening its antimicrobial activity. It is indicated for treatment of EOS with L. monocytogenes, susceptible H. influenzae, Streptococci spp., Enterococcus spp., and gram-negative organisms when susceptibility has been documented.

Ampicillin mediates time-dependent bacterial killing and frequent dosing allows the drug concentration to remain above the MIC for prolonged periods which is thought to improve efficacy. Because ampicillin undergoes renal clearance, neonates (both premature and term) with relatively immature renal function will maintain required levels with less frequent dosing. Although this is also the case for infants with acute renal dysfunction, ampicillin doses are rarely adjusted for renal insufficiency due to lack of neonatal PK data and relatively low drug toxicity. An open label PK study of 28 infants born <34 weeks gestation and 45 infants born >34 weeks gestation demonstrated a significant increase in clearance with increasing gestation and postnatal age56. This supports gestation-specific dosing regimens to achieve the required drug exposure above MIC for GBS and E.coli. Ampicillin-associated adverse effects in older children such as diarrhea, rash and increased bleeding tendency are rarely reported in neonates. Increased colonization with Klebsiella pneumonia has been noted with empiric early use compared to penicillin use50. Increased risk of seizures have been shown with high doses in simulated models57 that emphasize the need for PK and toxicity studies in neonates.

Gentamicin:

Aminoglycosides irreversibly bind to the 30s subunit of the bacterial ribosome, inhibiting protein synthesis and ultimately killing the organism. Gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin are the most frequently used aminoglycosides in neonates2. Tobramycin provides superior coverage for most strains of Pseudomonas and amikacin may be chosen for treatment of gentamicin-resistant organisms17. But in the absence of drug shortage, gentamicin remains the most appropriate choice for empiric therapy for EOS. While many gram-negative organisms are susceptible to aminoglycosides, concern for cumulative toxicity with prolonged therapy and poor outcomes in adult patients with gram-negative sepsis managed with aminoglycoside monotherapy58 has led to gentamicin being used largely in combination therapy.

Extended interval, high-dose regimens in neonatal EOS are designed to achieve peak concentrations over MIC of 8-10 while still achieving trough concentration of <2 mg/L59 Aminoglycosides peak concentrations above MIC are related to bacterial killing. Higher doses are needed in preterm neonates to achieve a similar peak concentration due their greater volume of distribution. Since gentamicin is eliminated through the kidneys, neonates with renal immaturity or injury clear the drug less efficiently. As a result, longer dosing intervals are recommended in premature neonates, neonates with kidney injury, and neonates in the first few days of life when renal clearance is lower. Retrospective analysis of clinically-obtained gentamicin levels in 994 preterm and 455 term infants found a significant effect of both gestational age and postnatal age on drug clearance60. This study validated the need for higher doses (5 mg/kg/dose) in extremely preterm neonates along with extended frequency of dosing (every 48 hours) to reach required therapeutic targets. Longer interval dosing of every 36 hours has also been recommended for neonates with hypoxic injury undergoing therapeutic hypothermia to obtain required trough levels61. The prevalence of renal and ototoxicity is difficult to establish in neonates due to multiple competing factors. Prolonged therapy and therapy in neonates with significant renal compromise should be managed by following serum drug levels to ensure appropriate trough levels.

Cefotaxime:

Cefotaxime is the most common systemic cephalosporin used in neonates2. A broad-spectrum, low-toxicity antibiotic with excellent CSF penetration62, cefotaxime targets specific penicillin-binding proteins which results in an extended spectrum compared to ampicillin. Cefotaxime is most frequently added to empiric regimens to broaden coverage against gram-negative bacilli (particularly when ampicillin-resistant E. coli is a concern) or provide coverage in suspected meningitis. Cefepime and ceftazidime may be used when cefotaxime is unavailable but the very broad-spectrum coverage provided by these antibiotics (e.g., for Pseudomonas and other ESBL organisms) is not currently indicated for empiric treatment of neonatal EOS. Ceftriaxone is rarely used in newborns due to its high avidity for serum albumin and increased risk of hyperbilirubinemia as well as its incompatibility with calcium-containing fluids.

Similar to ampicillin and other renally-cleared drugs with time-dependent killing, low-dose, frequent-interval regimens maximize the time cefotaxime levels remains above MIC. A study using scavenged blood specimens from 100 neonates born at 23-42 weeks gestation found that failure to shorten the dosing interval after the first week among neonates born >32 weeks gestation was associated with sub-therapeutic cefotaxime levels. This study recommended interval adjustments by gestational age at birth as well as by postnatal age63. Adverse drug reactions with cephalosporins (including allergy, diarrhea, bleeding, seizures, bone marrow suppression) have been primarily reported in adults. As noted above, neonatal cephalosporin use is associated with increased fungal colonization, infection, and increased mortality10,53.

Penicillin:

Penicillin G is a water-soluble intravenous formulation with a narrow spectrum and a long therapeutic history of use in neonates. Other formulations used include benzathine and procaine penicillin that allow for slow release from deep IM injections and are indicated for management of congenital syphilis. Penicillin and an aminoglycoside are used in combination as empiric therapy in some neonates3, but not commonly in the U.S. Penicillin remains the recommended definitive therapy for GBS, groups C and G streptococci, Treponema pallidum, and susceptible strains of viridans streptococci and enterococci64.

Pathogen killing by penicillin is determined by the time for which unbound drug in the serum remains above the MIC. It is recommended that levels be above the MIC for ~ 50% of the dosing interval. Like other beta-lactam antibiotics, penicillin is cleared by the kidney and interval adjustments should be made for preterm neonates and term neonates in the first days after birth65. A study of 18 infants born <28 weeks gestation found that a common penicillin dose recommendation (50,000 units/kg/dose every 12 hours) resulted in peak and trough concentrations in these infants that exceeded the MIC90 value for GBS (MIC value that inhibits 90% of isolates) by 1000- and 100-fold, respectively. Current recommendations involve much higher doses for treatment of GBS meningitis64 (250,000-450, 000 units/kg/day in three divided doses). The authors of that study noted that even with reduced penicillin penetration of the blood brain barrier (CSF: serum concentration ratio of ~5-10%)66 current regimens would consistently exceed MIC for GBS in the CSF, an observation that has been made by others7. Such studies highlight the difficulties of optimizing dosing recommendations among high-risk very preterm neonates with serious infections.

Piperacillin-tazobactum:

A semi-synthetic beta-lactam, piperacillin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with activity against S. aureus, most Streptococci sp., H. influenzae, Neisseria. meningitidis, L. monocytogenes, multiple gram-negative rods and many anaerobes. The tazobactum component acts to protect the piperacillin component from beta lactamase degradation. This antibiotic is infrequently indicated in the immediate neonatal period and more commonly used for late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Piperacillin-tazobactam use showed the highest absolute increase from 2005-2010 among antimicrobials used in 305 NICUs in the United States2. Its wide spectrum includes anaerobes and its safety profile makes it a useful choice in polymicrobial infection and in cases of intrabdominal pathology. While some extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing enterobacteriaceae demonstrate in vitro sensitivity to piperacillin-tazobactam, carbepenems remain the recommended drug of choice64 with superior results demonstrated in adults67.

As with most penicillins, piperacillin-tazobactam mediates time-dependent killing with renal clearance that increases with gestational and postnatal age. A PK study in 71 neonates born 26-41 weeks gestation found that birth weight and postmenstrual age significantly affected the dosing regimen68. Another study of 32 neonates born at 23-40 weeks gestation found that postmenstrual age alone was adequate to determine dosing regimen and prolonged infusions were not necessary to achieve therapeutic targets.69. Adverse effects are rarely noted in neonates70.

Meropenem:

Meropenem is a carbapenem beta-lactam antibiotic with a broad spectrum against pseudomonas and ESBL-producing bacteria. Unlike imipenem, it is labelled for use in premature neonates by the FDA. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci and most enterococci are resistant to meropenem. Meropenem is the drug of choice when an ESBL bacteria is isolated, or when there is known maternal ESBL colonization.

Meropenem also mediates time-dependent killing with renal clearance and requires interval adjustments with increases in gestational and postnatal age. A significant impact of postmenstrual age and serum creatinine levels was reported in a prospective PK study of 188 neonates born at 23-40 weeks gestation with suspected intraabdominal infection71. Although CSF levels measured in 9 neonates were variable, they were consistently above the therapeutic target. Meropenem is considered safer than imipenem for decreasing the seizure threshold by binding with GABA receptors in the brain7. In a review of adverse events associated with meropenem administration in 200 neonates, only 2 cases were considered drug-related, including one case of fungal infection72. In a randomized control trial of 102 infants with late-onset, gram-negative sepsis, continuous infusion of meropenem compared to intermittent bolus dosing was associated with less renal dysfunction73.

Vancomycin:

This glycopeptide acts by inhibiting peptidoglycan cell wall formation and is infrequently indicated shortly after birth. Vancomycin is primarily used for beta-lactam resistant organisms such as Enterococci, Staphylococci and Streptococcus pneumonia64.

Vancomycin is excreted unchanged by the kidneys and demonstrates time-dependent killing that is best reflected in 24-hour area under the curve for serum concentration divided by MIC (AUC24). Neonatal vancomycin dosing regimens remain subject to debate6,74. In adults, efficacy is associated with doses that achieve an exposure target of AUC/MIC >400 or serum steady state trough levels of 15-20 mg/L. This has been determined to be a useful surrogate measure of AUC/MIC 400 when the MIC is ≤1mg/L75. However, in neonates, a trough level of 7-11 mg/L resulted in ~90% of cases attaining AUC24>40076. This AUC/MIC efficacy exposure target is difficult to achieve for organisms with an MIC>1 mg/L74. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity along with rash, red-man syndrome, and altered colonization have been reported in adults with vancomycin use, but the incidence among neonates is unclear74. Overall, the unexplained variability of drug exposure in PK studies support the use of trough drug levels to tailor prolonged management77.

Oxacillin/Nafcillin:

These semi-synthetic derivatives of penicillins are not affected by penicillinases produced by staphylococci. In adults with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infection, the use of beta-lactam antibiotics is associated with improved survival compared to vancomycin78. Oxacillin/nafcillin are the drug of choice for MSSA, which is isolated in neonatal EOS in <5% of cases44. Nafcillin is cleared by the liver and oxacillin by the kidney. Few recent studies have informed neonatal PK dosing5,79. Both drugs have a similar safety profile to other penicillins and demonstrate time-dependent killing.

CONCLUSION:

Monitoring the incidence and microbiology of perinatal infections is critical to informing the choice for antibacterial infection and prophylaxis therapy. Changes in antimicrobial susceptibilities of common pathogens and increasing survival of extremely preterm neonates highlight the inadequacies of available drug information for the neonate. The goals of antibiotic therapy should be to attain the desired effect with minimal toxicity for the individual while reducing selection pressures for the unit and the community. Placental antibiotic kinetics and neonatal-specific PK studies are needed to better define optimal prophylactic and therapeutic dosing regimens for perinatal infection prevention and treatment.

Supplementary Material

1

Table 3:

Microbiology and antibiotic susceptibilities of EOS pathogens

Bacteria in EOS (% of cases)* Ampicillin
susceptibility
Gentamicin
susceptibility
Cephalosporin
susceptibility
General comments
GBS 22,44,64
(35.8%)
100% susceptible Intrinsic resistance but when paired with a beta-lactam, aminoglycosides can act synergistically 100% susceptible
  • Drug of choice: penicillin G; ampicillin is alternate

  • GBS meningitis: higher dose and longer therapy. Some guidelines include gentamicin for synergy (5 days). Complicated or unresponsive cases may require repeat CSF testing to determine therapy duration.

  • Reports of high-level gentamicin-resistant GBS strains in adults with concern for loss of synergy

E. coli 13,44,80,81
(24.8%)
~22% susceptible ~90% susceptible Combination therapy with a beta lactam in meningitis Case reports of ESBL E. coli sepsis in NICUs after maternal travel in high-prevalence areas and in late-onset sepsis
  • Drug of choice: based on susceptibility. Commonly cefotaxime

  • Reports of gentamicin-resistance with retained susceptibility to amikacin

  • ESBL E. coli treated with carbapenems

  • Peripartum transmission of ESBL E. coli strains from mother to infant highlight possible role of maternal isolate data to inform antimicrobial choices in infants with poor response to standard empiric therapy

Viridans streptococci64,82
(18.9%)
Variable susceptibility; population surveillance susceptibility 67% Added for synergy in endocarditis where isolate has intermediate-level resistance to penicillin Majority susceptible (87% found susceptible to cefepime)
  • Drug of choice: penicillin G when penicillin susceptible

  • Cephalosporin second line for penicillin-resistant strains

  • Alternate agent: vancomycin

H. influenzae64,83 (4.5%) Worldwide susceptibility reported ~82% Susceptible at baseline but not recommended for definitive therapy. Acquired resistance with use has been reported. Worldwide susceptibility high (100% to ceftriaxone)
  • Drug of choice: ampicillin in susceptible variants.

  • Alternate: cephalosporins

  • Beta-lactamase negative, ampicillin-resistant variants are difficult to test for susceptibility because the MIC are only slightly elevated from susceptible variants. Such cases may require use of cephalosporins.

Staphylococcus aureus44,78,84
(3.5%)
Most strains resistant due to production of beta lactamases Susceptible at baseline but not recommended due to better alternates. Variable increase in resistance has been reported worldwide Variable susceptibility
  • Drug of choice for MSSA: oxacillin or nafcillin has better outcomes than vancomycin.

  • Drug of choice for MRSA: vancomycin

  • MRSA in EOS is still rare. In a population study of EOS pathogens S. aureus accounted for 0.03 cases/1000 live births in USA and 1/23 cases were MRSA

  • Maternal history of MRSA colonization/disease can inform antimicrobial choices.

  • In cases of endocarditis and device-related MRSA infection, addition of gentamicin and rifampin is recommended

Enterococcus spp. (3.1%) E. fecalis mostly sensitive and more frequent cause of EOS. E. faecium largely resistant Intrinsic resistance but has been used synergistically in endocarditis. Intrinsically resistant
  • Drug of choice: Penicillin or ampicillin

  • Alternate: Vancomycin

  • Rare case reports of neonatal late-onset vancomycin resistant enterococci treated with linezolid

  • Gentamicin not recommended if acquired high level resistance is documented

Group D streptococcus (1.4%) e.g. S bovis Universally susceptible May be used for synergy Susceptible
  • Drug of choice: penicillin G

L. monocytogenes (1.3%)85 Susceptible but bacteriostatic Intracellular form of listeria is protected from gentamicin. May be added for synergy Intrinsically resistant
  • Drug of choice: ampicillin with a aminoglycoside

  • Alternate agent: vancomycin

  • Reports of ampicillin resistance present in adults and in the food industry

Klebsiella pneumoniae 11,86 (<1%) and other Enterobacteriaceae Increasingly resistant Susceptible at baseline. Acquired resistance has been described. Amikacin susceptibility may be retained despite gentamicin resistance Susceptible. ESBL isolates most cephalosporins including cefepime.
  • Drug of choice: based on susceptibility with ampicillin or cefotaxime

  • ESBL pathogen - drug of choice is a carbapenam

  • K. pneumoniae is the most common ESBL Enterobacteriaceae reported in NICU, in late onset sepsis. Risk factors includes prior antibiotic exposure.

  • Synergistic therapy with gentamicin in meningitis has been recommended

Streptococcus pneumoniae11 (<1%) and other GPC Increasing penicillin resistance Intrinsic resistance Variable susceptibility
  • Drug of choice: based on susceptibility, penicillin or cephalosporin if susceptible and vancomycin with rifampin if penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant

*

Top 10 pathogens associated with invasive EOS occurring 2005-2014 in United States using absolute frequencies44. Resistant patterns are noted in perinatal infection only for GBS and E .Coli. Remaining susceptible patterns are based on case reports or information on older infants and adults87,88

KEY POINTS.

  • Early onset sepsis remains a common clinical concern in neonates with persistently high morbidity and mortality, particularly among preterm infants.

  • Antibiotics administered to the mother during the intrapartum period can reduce the risk of some perinatal infections by reducing ascending bacterial colonization and via transplacental antibiotic transfer to the fetus/newborn.

  • Ampicillin and gentamicin remain the first-line choice for empiric treatment of early-onset sepsis.

  • Understanding antibiotic pharmacology can allow neonatal providers to optimize antibiotic choice and minimize resistance-promoting selection pressures.

SYNOPSIS.

Antimicrobial medications are the most commonly used medications in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Antibiotics are used for infection prophylaxis, empiric treatment, and definitive treatment of confirmed infection. The choice of medication should be informed by the epidemiology and microbiology of infection in specific clinical scenarios and by the clinical condition of the infant. Understanding evolving pathogen susceptibility to antimicrobials and key pharmacotherapy determinants in neonates can inform optimal antibiotic use.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

None

REFERENCES:

  • 1.Flannery DD, Ross RK, Mukhopadhyay S, Tribble AC, Puopolo KM, Gerber JS. Temporal trends and center variation in early antibiotic use among premature infants. JAMA Network Open. 2018;1(1):e180164–e180164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hsieh EM, Hornik CP, Clark RH, et al. Medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(9):811–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cailes B, Kortsalioudaki C, Buttery J, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in UK neonatal units: neonIN infection surveillance network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(5):F474–F478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dallefeld S, Hornik CD, Zimmerman K, Cohen-wolkoweiz M. Antibiotic dosing considerations for term and preterm infants In: Bentiz WE, Smith PB, eds. Neonatology questions and controversies: Infectious disease and pharmacology. 1st ed. Elsevier; 2018:167. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pacifici GM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides in the neonate: A review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010;3(8):2568–2591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Metsvaht T, Nellis G, Varendi H, et al. High variability in the dosing of commonly used antibiotics revealed by a europe-wide point prevalence study: Implications for research and dissemination. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:41–015–0359-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wade KC, Benjamin DK. Remington and klein's infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn chapter 37: Clinical pharmacology of anti-infective drugs. In: Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado YA, Remington JS, Klein JO, eds. 8th ed. China: Elseiver Saunders; 2016:1160–1211. 10.1016/B978-1-4160-6400-8.00037-7". [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bueva A, Guignard J. Renal function in preterm neonates. Pediatr Res. 1994;36(5):572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Neu HC, Gootz TD. Chapter 11: Antimicrobial chemotherapy In: Baron S, ed. Medical microbiology. 4th ed. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Le J, Nguyen T, Okamoto M, McKamy S, Lieberman JM. Impact of empiric antibiotic use on development of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteria in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(4):314–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Centers of disease control and prevention: Threat report 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/. Updated 2013.
  • 12.Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the society for healthcare epidemiology of america (SHEA), the infectious diseases society of america (IDSA), and the pediatric infectious diseases society (PIDS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(4):322–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oteo J, Cercenado E, Fernandez-Romero S, et al. Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing escherichia coli as a cause of pediatric infections: Report of a neonatal intensive care unit outbreak due to a CTX-M-14-producing strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(1):54–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cantey JB, Sreeramoju P, Jaleel M, et al. Prompt control of an outbreak caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 2013;163(3):672–9.e1-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carr D, Barnes EH, Gordon A, Isaacs D. Effect of antibiotic use on antimicrobial antibiotic resistance and late-onset neonatal infections over 25 years in an australian tertiary neonatal unit. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102(3):F244–F250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schrag SJ, Zell ER, Lynfield R, et al. A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(4):233–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mendoza-Palomar N, Balasch-Carulla M, Gonzalez-Di Lauro S, et al. Escherichia coli early-onset sepsis: Trends over two decades. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(9):1227–1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tamma PD, Cosgrove SE, Maragakis LL. Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(3):450–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Swingle HM, Bucciarelli RL, Ayoub EM. Synergy between penicillins and low concentrations of gentamicin in the killing of group B streptococci. J Infect Dis. 1985;152(3):515–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC Jr. Antibiotic synergism and antimicrobial combinations in clinical infections. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4(2):282–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paul M, Lador A, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Leibovici L. Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):CD003344. doi(1):CD003344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sendi P, Furitsch M, Mauerer S, et al. Chromosomally and extrachromosomally mediated high-level gentamicin resistance in streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(3):1702–1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Edwards MS, Nizet V, Baker CJ. Remington and klein's infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant chapter 12: Group B streptococcal infections. In: Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado YA, Remington JS, Klein JO, eds. 8th ed. China: Elseiver; 2016:411–456. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Neonatal infection (early onset): Antibiotics for prevention and treatment (CG149). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg149.Updated 2012.
  • 25.Yow MD, Mason EO, Leeds LJ, Thompson PK, Clark DJ, Gardner SE. Ampicillin prevents intrapartum transmission of group B streptococcus. JAMA. 1979;241(12):1245–1247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Boyer KM, Gadzala CA, Kelly PD, Gotoff SP. Selective intrapartum chemoprophylaxis of neonatal group B streptococcal early-onset disease. III. interruption of mother-to-infant transmission. J Infect Dis 1983;148(5):810–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barber EL, Zhao G, Buhimschi IA, Illuzzi JL. Duration of intrapartum prophylaxis and concentration of penicillin G in fetal serum at delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(2 Pt 1):265–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Berardi A, Rossi C, Creti R, et al. Group B streptococcal colonization in 160 mother-baby pairs: A prospective cohort study. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1099–104.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.de Cueto M, Sanchez MJ, Sampedro A, Miranda JA, Herruzo AJ, Rosa-Fraile M. Timing of intrapartum ampicillin and prevention of vertical transmission of group B streptococcus. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(1):112–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brown CE, Christmas JT, Bawdon RE. Placental transfer of cefazolin and piperacillin in pregnancies remote from term complicated by rh isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):938–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Groff SM, Fallatah W, Yang S, et al. Effect of maternal obesity on maternal-fetal transfer of preoperative cefazolin at cesarean section. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017;22(3):227–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fiore Mitchell T, Pearlman MD, Chapman RL, Bhatt-Mehta V, Faix RG. Maternal and transplacental pharmacokinetics of cefazolin. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(6):1075–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Knight KM, Thornburg LL, McNanley AR, Hardy DJ, Vicino D, Glantz JC. The effect of intrapartum clindamycin on vaginal group B streptococcus colony counts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(6):747–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weinstein AJ, Gibbs RS, Gallagher M. Placental transfer of clindamycin and gentamicin in term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 124(7):688–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Philipson A, Sabath LD, Charles D. Transplacental passage of erythromycin and clindamycin. N Engl J Med. 1973;288(23):1219–1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hawkins PA, Law CS, Metcalf BJ, et al. Cross-resistance to lincosamides, streptogramins A and pleuromutilins in streptococcus agalactiae isolates from the USA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(7):1886–1892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Castor ML, Whitney CG, Como-Sabetti K, et al. Antibiotic resistance patterns in invasive group B streptococcal isolates. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2008:727505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Back EE, O'Grady EJ, Back JD. High rates of perinatal group B streptococcus clindamycin and erythromycin resistance in an upstate new york hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(2):739–742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sherman K, Whitehead S, Blondel-Hill E, Wagner K, Cheeptham N. Penicillin susceptibility and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance in group B streptococcus isolates from a canadian hospital. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2012;23(4):196–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nanovskaya T, Patrikeeva S, Zhan Y, Fokina V, Hankins GD, Ahmed MS. Transplacental transfer of vancomycin and telavancin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):331.e1–331.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Laiprasert J, Klein K, Mueller BA, Pearlman MD. Transplacental passage of vancomycin in noninfected term pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(5):1105–1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Heine RP, Puopolo KM, Beigi R, Silverman NS, El-Sayed YY. Committee on obstetric practice. committee opinion no. 712: Intrapartum management of intraamniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):e95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-10):1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schrag SJ, Farley MM, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis, 2005 to 2014. Pediatrics. 2016; 138(6): 10.1542/peds.2016-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Puopolo KM, Mukhopadhyay S, Hansen NI, et al. Identification of extremely premature infants at low risk for early-onset sepsis. Pediatrics. 2017;140(5): 10.1542/peds.2017-0925. Epub 2017 Oct 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barton M, O'Brien K, Robinson JL, et al. Invasive candidiasis in low birth weight preterm infants: Risk factors, clinical course and outcome in a prospective multicenter study of cases and their matched controls. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:327–2334–14–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Weston EJ, Pondo T, Lewis MM, et al. The burden of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis in the united states, 2005–2008. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(11):937–941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1039–1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mtitimila EI, Cooke RW. Antibiotic regimens for suspected early neonatal sepsis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Metsvaht T, Ilmoja ML, Parm U, et al. Ampicillin versus penicillin in the empiric therapy of extremely low-birthweight neonates at risk of early onset sepsis. Pediatr Int. 2011;53(6):873–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Metsvaht T, Ilmoja ML, Parm U, Maipuu L, Merila M, Lutsar I. Comparison of ampicillin plus gentamicin vs. penicillin plus gentamicin in empiric treatment of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(5):665–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bergin SP, Thaden JT, Ericson JE, et al. Neonatal escherichia coli bloodstream infections: Clinical outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(9):933–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Clark RH, Bloom BT, Spitzer AR, Gerstmann DR. Empiric use of ampicillin and cefotaxime, compared with ampicillin and gentamicin, for neonates at risk for sepsis is associated with an increased risk of neonatal death. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):67–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Benjamin DK Jr, Stoll BJ, Gantz MG, et al. Neonatal candidiasis: Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e865–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Sanchez PJ, et al. Early onset neonatal sepsis: The burden of group B streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):817–826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tremoulet A, Le J, Poindexter B, et al. Characterization of the population pharmacokinetics of ampicillin in neonates using an opportunistic study design. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(6):3013–3020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hornik CP, Benjamin DK Jr, Smith PB, et al. Electronic health records and pharmacokinetic modeling to assess the relationship between ampicillin exposure and seizure risk in neonates. J Pediatr. 2016;178:125–129.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Leibovici L, Paul M, Poznanski O, et al. Monotherapy versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination treatment for gram-negative bacteremia: A prospective, observational study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(5):1127–1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Eliopoulos GM, Drusano GL, Ambrose PG, et al. Back to the future: Using aminoglycosides again and how to dose them optimally. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;45(6):753–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fuchs A, Guidi M, Giannoni E, et al. Population pharmacokinetic study of gentamicin in a large cohort of premature and term neonates. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78(5):1090–1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Frymoyer A, Meng L, Bonifacio SL, Verotta D, Guglielmo BJ. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics and dosing in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2013;33(7):718–726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pacifici GM. Pharmacokinetics of cephalosporins in the neonate: A review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(7):1267–1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Leroux S, Roue JM, Gouyon JB, et al. A population and developmental pharmacokinetic analysis to evaluate and optimize cefotaxime dosing regimen in neonates and young infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(11):6626–6634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kimberlin W, Brady MT, Jackson MA, Long SS, eds. Red book. committee on infectious diseases. american academy of pediatrics. 31st ed. AAP; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Muller AE, DeJongh J, Bult Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of penicillin G in infants with a gestational age of less than 32 weeks. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(10):3720–3725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lutsar I, McCracken GH Jr, Friedland IR. Antibiotic pharmacodynamics in cerebrospinal fluid. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1998:1117–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, et al. Effect of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem on 30-day mortality for patients with E coli or klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(10):984–994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li Z, Chen Y, Li Q, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin/tazobactam in neonates and young infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(6):1223–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Watt KM, Zhou C, et al. Developmental pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam using plasma and dried blood spots from infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(5):2856–2865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Berger A, Kretzer V, Apfalter P, Rohrmeister K, Zaknun D, Pollak A. Safety evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam in very low birth weight infants. Journal of chemotherapy. 2004;16(2):166–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Smith PB, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Castro LM, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of infants with suspected or complicated intra-abdominal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(10):844–849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Poindexter B, Bidegain M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of meropenem in infants with suspected or complicated intra-abdominal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(11):1495–1502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shabaan AE, Nour I, Elsayed Eldegla H, Nasef N, Shouman B, Abdel-Hady H. Conventional versus prolonged infusion of meropenem in neonates with gram-negative late-onset sepsis: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(4):358–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jacqz-Aigrain E, Zhao W, Sharland M, van den Anker, John N Use of antibacterial agents in the neonate: 50 years of experience with vancomycin administration. . 2013;18(1):28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Alvarez R, Lopez Cortes LE, Molina J, Cisneros JM, Pachon J. Optimizing the clinical use of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(5):2601–2609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Frymoyer A, Hersh AL, El-Komy MH, et al. Association between vancomycin trough concentration and area under the concentration-time curve in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(11):6454–6461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pacifici GM, Allegaert K. Clinical pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in the neonate: A review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(7):831–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.McDanel JS, Perencevich EN, Diekema DJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;61(3):361–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Banner W Jr, Gooch WM 3rd, Burckart G, Korones SB. Pharmacokinetics of nafcillin in infants with low birth weights. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;17(4):691–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hayat S, Berry N, Lewis A, Turton J, Matthes J. An outbreak of ESBL-producing E. coli in a NICU. . [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Peretz A, Skuratovsky A, Khabra E, et al. Peripartum maternal transmission of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase organism to newborn infants. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;87(2):168–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Diekema DJ, Beach ML, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, SENTRY Participants Group. Antimicrobial resistance in viridans group streptococci among patients with and without the diagnosis of cancer in the USA, canada and latin america. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7(3):152–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tristram S, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC. Antimicrobial resistance in haemophilus influenzae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(2):368–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schmitz FJ, Fluit AC, Gondolf M, et al. The prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and corresponding resistance genes in clinical isolates of staphylococci from 19 european hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43(2):253–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado YA, Remington JS, Klein JO. Remington and klein's infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. Elseiver; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li X, Xu X, Yang X, et al. Risk factors for infection and/or colonisation with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in the neonatal intensive care unit: A meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017;50(5):622–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Kugler K. Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infection: Frequencies of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (united states and canada, 1997). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(7):1762–1770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, SENTRY Participants Group. Age-related trends in pathogen frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of bloodstream isolates in north america: SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1997–2000. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;20(6):412–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Heine RP, Puopolo KM, Beigi R, Silverman NS, El-Sayed YY; Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 712: Intrapartum Management of Intraamniotic Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):e95–e101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nanduri SA, Petit S, Smelser C, et al. Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset and Late-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: Multistate Laboratory and Population-Based Surveillance. JAMA Pediatr. 2019. January 14. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE; Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Committee on Infectious Diseases. Management of Neonates Born at ≤34 6/7 Weeks' Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6). pii: e20182896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE; Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Committee on Infectious Diseases. Management of Neonates Born at ≥35 0/7 Weeks' Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6). pii: e20182894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Schrag SJ, Farley MM, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, 2005 to 2014. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6). pii: e20162013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ; Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-10):1–36 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES