Predominant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 is believed to have originated from an ancestral methicillin-susceptible strain, although the details of that evolution remain unknown. To help understand the emergence of this highly successful strain, we sequenced the genomes of two methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains that are very closely related to USA300.
ABSTRACT
Predominant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 is believed to have originated from an ancestral methicillin-susceptible strain, although the details of that evolution remain unknown. To help understand the emergence of this highly successful strain, we sequenced the genomes of two methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains that are very closely related to USA300.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The evolutionary origins of the major methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones are still poorly understood, although it is hypothesized that they repeatedly arose from epidemic methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains through acquisition of the mecA gene via horizontal transfer (1–5). The highly successful community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) strain USA300 has become predominant in North America, causing significant morbidity and mortality (6–12). It is believed to have descended from an ancestral USA500-like MSSA strain through acquisition of multiple mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and clonal expansion (13, 14). As with the other major MRSA clones, more work is needed to fully understand its emergence and success. To that end, we selected two MSSA isolates that are closely related to USA300 for whole-genome sequencing, with the goal of elucidating the genetic and evolutionary relationships between these MSSA isolates and the highly successful USA300 MRSA group. Strain H489 was isolated by our clinical microbiological laboratory from the sputum of a patient from our local health care region in Calgary, Canada, in 1993, well before our USA300 outbreak began in 2004. Likewise, strain C3948 was isolated from a patient in 2002, just before the USA300 outbreak. Multilocus sequence analysis of the isolates indicated that, similarly to the USA300 outbreak strain, they belonged to sequence type 8 (ST8).
Genomic DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction of overnight cultures started from a single colony. Library preparation, DNA sequencing, contig assembly, and genome circularization were performed at the Génome Québec Innovation Centre in Montreal, Canada. Sheared large-insert libraries were prepared with Covaris g-TUBES and the SMRTbell template prep kit 1.0. Sequencing was done using the Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) RSII sequencing technology, with one single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cell. Contig assembly was done using the RS Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process (HGAP) protocol version 2.3.0.140936.p5 (15–17), with read quality controlled by aligning short reads on longer reads using BLASR (15). The genomes were circularized using Circlator version 1.4.1 and adjusted to the origin of replication (18). Gene annotation was done using the NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline version 4.1, using the best-placed reference protein set (GeneMarkS+) (19).
Two contigs were assembled for MSSA strain C3948 from 85,037 raw reads, covering 1,142,835,600 sequenced bases, with an N50 value of 2,823,074 bp. The estimated genome coverage was 368×, and the GC content was 32.82%. On the assembled chromosome of 2,795,888 bp, 2,924 genes were identified, of which 2,842 were coding sequences (CDS), 82 were RNA genes, and 76 were pseudogenes. Four contigs were assembled for MSSA strain H489 from 94,559 raw reads covering 1,215,818,661 sequenced bases, with an N50 value of 2,761,569 bp. The estimated genome coverage was 392×, and the GC content was 32.79%. On the chromosome of 2,757,748 bp, 2,874 genes were identified, of which 2,789 were CDS, 85 were RNA genes, and 94 were pseudogenes.
A complete analysis is under way to look at the major genetic components in these MSSA isolates and compare them with those found in MRSA USA300 to help shed light on the evolutionary path of the highly successful USA300 strain.
Data availability.
The chromosomal genome sequences have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers CP020957 (C3948) and CP020959 (H489), with SRA accession numbers SRX5551895 (C3948) and SRX5552203 (H489).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by operation grants (FRN: ARE-147623 and ARF-151557) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada, and in part by an operating fund from the Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance (CAR), Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada.
REFERENCES
- 1.Enright MC, Robinson DA, Randle G, Feil EJ, Grundmann H, Spratt BG. 2002. The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7687–7692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122108599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fitzgerald JR, Sturdevant DE, Mackie SM, Gill SR, Musser JM. 2001. Evolutionary genomics of Staphylococcus aureus: insights into the origin of methicillin-resistant strains and the toxic shock syndrome epidemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8821–8826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161098098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kreiswirth B, Kornblum J, Arbeit RD, Eisner W, Maslow JN, McGeer A, Low DE, Novick RP. 1993. Evidence for a clonal origin of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Science 259:227–230. doi: 10.1126/science.8093647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Robinson DA, Enright MC. 2003. Evolutionary models of the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3926–3934. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3926-3934.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lakhundi S, Zhang K. 2018. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00020-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00020-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carrel M, Perencevich EN, David MZ. 2015. USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 2000–2013. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1973–1980. doi: 10.3201/eid2111.150452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diekema DJ, Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Riahi F, Tendolkar S, McDanel JS, Doern GV. 2014. Continued emergence of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: results from a nationwide surveillance study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35:285–292. doi: 10.1086/675283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jenkins TC, McCollister BD, Sharma R, McFann KK, Madinger NE, Barron M, Bessesen M, Price CS, Burman WJ. 2009. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection caused by USA300 strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:233–241. doi: 10.1086/595963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Craig AS, Zell ER, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Fridkin SK, Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) MRSA Investigators . 2007. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1771. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.15.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kreisel KM, Stine OC, Johnson JK, Perencevich EN, Shardell MD, Lesse AJ, Gordin FM, Climo MW, Roghmann MC. 2011. USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and the risk of severe sepsis: is USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with more severe infections? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 70:285–290. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McCaskill ML, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL, Hammerman W, Lamberth LB, Hulten KG. 2007. Increase of the USA300 clone among community-acquired methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26:1122–1127. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31814536e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simor AE, Gilbert NL, Gravel D, Mulvey MR, Bryce E, Loeb M, Matlow A, McGeer A, Louie L, Campbell J, Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program . 2010. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection in Canada: national surveillance and changing epidemiology, 1995–2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31:348–356. doi: 10.1086/651313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tenover FC, Goering RV. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300: origin and epidemiology. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:441–446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jamrozy DM, Harris SR, Mohamed N, Peacock SJ, Tan CY, Parkhill J, Anderson AS, Holden MT. 2016. Pan-genomic perspective on the evolution of the Staphylococcus aureus USA300 epidemic. Microb Genom 2:e000058. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chaisson MJ, Tesler G. 2012. Mapping single molecule sequencing reads using Basic Local Alignment with Successive Refinement (BLASR): application and theory. BMC Bioinformatics 13:238. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Myers EW, Sutton GG, Delcher AL, Dew IM, Fasulo DP, Flanigan MJ, Kravitz SA, Mobarry CM, Reinert KH, Remington KA, Anson EL, Bolanos RA, Chou HH, Jordan CM, Halpern AL, Lonardi S, Beasley EM, Brandon RC, Chen L, Dunn PJ, Lai Z, Liang Y, Nusskern DR, Zhan M, Zhang Q, Zheng X, Rubin GM, Adams MD, Venter JC. 2000. A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila. Science 287:2196–2204. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hunt M, De Silva N, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The chromosomal genome sequences have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers CP020957 (C3948) and CP020959 (H489), with SRA accession numbers SRX5551895 (C3948) and SRX5552203 (H489).
