Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2019 Mar 15;12(3):397–401. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.397-401

Antiseptic effect of natural teat dip containing lactic acid against mastitis-causing Escherichia coli

Rinrada Chotigarpa 1, Kannika Na Lampang 1, Surachai Pikulkaew 2,4, Siriporn Okonogi 3,4, Pirote Silman 5, Raktham Mektrirat 1,4,✉
PMCID: PMC6487238  PMID: 31089309

Abstract

Aim:

This study aimed to estimate the enumeration of total bacteria and coliform on teat skin from dairy cows and evaluate the efficacy of the natural rice gel containing 5% v/v lactic acid (NGL) against Escherichia coli standard and field strains isolated from bovine teat skin.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 100 bacterial teat skin samples (25 cows) were collected from dairy cows in smallholder farm. The cows were housed in freestall barns. The colonization of total bacteria and E. coli on teat skin was measured by 3M Petrifilm method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of lactic acid were evaluated for reference strain of E. coli ATCC 25922 and two field strains of E. coli. The natural teat sanitizer was formulated using 5% NGL with modified rice gel. In vitro antiseptic efficacy of 5% NGL was determined by time-kill kinetic assay. E. coli morphology after exposure with 5% NGL was examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Results:

The total bacteria and coliform counts from bovine teat skin were 2.11×104 and 1.54×101 colony-forming units/ml, respectively. The MIC and MBC of lactic acid on the tested bacteria were 0.5% v/v. The natural teat dip was successfully prepared with minimum change in consistency after 1 year of storage at 4°C. The reduction rate of 5% NGL on E. coli ATCC 25922 and field strain showed 32.77% and 27.58%, respectively. An appearance under SEM of non-viable E. coli after being incubated with 5% NGL clearly showed atypical form and rough surface cell membrane.

Conclusion:

The rice gel containing 5% v/v lactic acid is a promising preparation as a natural teat antiseptic for reducing bacteria on teat skin. It was shown to be effective against E. coli causing bovine mastitis in dairy cows.

Keywords: antiseptic, Escherichia coli, lactic acid, teat skin

Introduction

In the dairy industry, bovine mastitis is a critical problem of economic loss, milk loss and affects milk components. The prevalence of clinical and subclinical mastitis is 16-48% and 29-79%, respectively [1-5]. Although the prevalence of clinical mastitis is lower than subclinical, it can result in severe milk loss and a high risk of cow culling. Escherichia coli are the etiological agents often isolated from clinical cases in India and China [6,7]. It is normally found in environment and gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals [8]. The common sources of exposure to Gram-negative bacteria in dairy farm include manure, contaminated bedding, water, soil, and feedstuffs. It is the most frequent foodborne pathogen associated with milk or dairy products [9]. Poor milking practices are associated with the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase E. coli resulting in a high risk of intramammary infection and greater usage of antibiotics with the possibility of developing antibiotic resistance [10].

It is known that teat disinfection pre- and post-milking is an important tool to reduce the possibility of mastitis. Pre-milking teat disinfection will probably reduce the number of environmental pathogens, while post-milking teat disinfection is effective against contagious mastitis pathogens [11]. Pre-milking teat disinfection is not popularly used in Thailand. Hence, the prevalence of environmental mastitis pathogen is still high [12,13]. The prior study concluded that applying the pre-milking teat dipping showed a significant reduction in the number of bacteria on teat skin and new cases of mastitis caused by coliforms and environmental Streptococcus spp. [14,15].

2-hydroxypropanoic acid or lactic acid products have been shown to have antibacterial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [16]. These ingredients are used in food and cosmetics as preservatives and also have low toxicity. From the previous report, lactic acid is less sensitive to skin irritation [17]. Many commercial teat antiseptic products have various active ingredients including iodine, hydrogen peroxide, chlorine, and chlorhexidine. Some may cause skin irritation and bacterial resistance [18]. Therefore, preparations of natural products are attractive.

The objectives of this research were to explore the number of total bacteria and coliforms on teat skin from smallholder dairy farm in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. The antibacterial activities of 5% natural gel lactic acid (NGL) against E. coli were investigated by time-kill kinetic assay. The preparation of NGL affected bacterial cell structure was also observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand (Approval No. S37/2559).

Animal and study area

The study was conducted in a smallholder farm in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand, subregion of San Kamphaeng. The global positioning system of this subregion coordinates of 18°44′43″ N 99°7′13″ E. 25 Holstein Friesian cows were housed in freestall barn dairy farms and milked twice a day. Cows with good udder health were required for this study.

Collection of teat skin samples

A total of 100 teat skin samples (1 swab/teat of 25 cows) were collected from healthy dairy cows on July 2017-August 2017. Teat skin samples were collected after washing udder with clean water and dried before the milking process using a sterile cotton swab with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) [19]. All samples were kept at 5°C and transported to the laboratory within 4 h for total bacteria and coliform counting.

Petrifilm method for counting bacteria

For the 3M Petrifilm method, the samples were diluted by 10-fold dilution and 1 ml inoculated on 3M Petrifilm rapid aerobic count plate and 3M Petrifilm coliform count plate for counting total bacteria and coliform, respectively. The Petrifilms were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, the number of bacterial colonies was counted with the guideline of 3M Petrifilm interpretation. Pink colonies were enumerated as total bacteria, while red and blue colonies with gas were counted as coliform. The limitation of 3M Petrifilm rapid aerobic count plate and coliform count plate is 300 and 150 colonies, respectively. If the bacteria are too many to count, the average number of bacteria can be made by counting in one square (1 cm2) and multiply it by 20 to get the number of total bacteria per plate [20].

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) determination

The bacterial strain of standard E. coli ATCC 25922 and the field isolates of E. coli were provided by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. An in vitro broth microdilution test was carried out to determine the MIC and MBC of lactic acid against standard E. coli ATCC 25922, and the field strains consisted of two unrelated isolates of E. coli. The bacteria cells were cultured in tryptic soy agar (Merck, Germany) plates containing 5% sheep blood, following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendation. The bacterial colonies from the agar were inoculated into test tube containing Mueller-Hinton broth (Merck, Germany), and the turbidity was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard before use. Lactic acid was diluted into various concentrations of 10, 5, 1, 0.5, and 0.1% v/v in sterile distilled water in test tubes. A sterile 96-well plate containing equal volumes of bacterial suspension and various concentrations of lactic acid was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Plates were observed for the absence or presence of turbidity. The minimum concentration of the lactic acid showing no turbidity was recorded as MIC value. The MBC value was determined by the drop plate technique on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) from the clear wells. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight. The lowest lactic acid concentration that could completely inhibit bacterial growth is the MBC value. The MIC and MBC assays of each strain were run in duplicate.

Preparation and characterization of natural gel containing lactic acid

The nano preparation containing 5% v/v lactic acid was obtained from the Research Center of Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. The chemical modification method of milled rice grains was performed based on the method previously described by Okonogi et al. [21] and Chotigarpa et al. [22]. Briefly, the modified rice powder was used for gel base preparation and viscosity building agent. Polysorbate 80 was used for preparing an aqueous solution of lactic acid. Then, purified water was added to adjust the final concentration of lactic acid to 5% v/v. The mixture was gently stirred and then subjected to a high shear mixing device (Ultra-Turrax T25) at high-speed stirring of 5000 rpm for 1 min. The preparation was prepared under sterile condition and examined for contaminated bacteria. After freshly prepared and after 1 year storage at 4°C, the preparation was observed with physical appearances, air bubbles, color, viscosity, and pH. The pH was measured using a pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland).

The time-kill kinetic assay

An in vitro modified time-kill analysis was performed to find out the killing time of standard and two field isolates of E. coli. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards. An exact amount of 0.8 ml of 5% NGL and 0.1 ml of bovine fetal serum was added into 0.1 ml of each bacterial suspension. The samples were 10-fold serial diluted in PBS. The mixture samples were taken at time intervals of 30 s and 1, 5, 15, 30, and 60 min and inoculated aseptically into approximately 20 ml of plate count agar (Merck, Germany) by pour plate technique at 37°C for 24 h. Then, viable bacteria were counted. The procedure was performed in duplicate (two independent experiments) and a graph of the log colony-forming units (CFU)/ml and time were plotted.

Detection of bacterial morphology by SEM

E. coli ATCC 25922 in normal saline solution (NSS) was incubated with 5% lactic acid at 37°C for 8 h, while the viable bacteria in NSS without lactic acid were used as a culture control. The treated cell was fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4°C for 24 h. The specimen was dehydrated with graded ethanol and sputter coated with gold particles before examining the cell morphological appearance under SEM (JEOL JSM 5410LV, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

All tested bacteria were normalized to CFU and then log 10 transformed before analysis. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance; significant differences were assumed if probabilities <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with R statistical software (Rstudio, Boston, MA, USA).

Results and Discussion

Number of total bacteria and coliform count on teat skin

This study was performed during 2 months in a smallholder farm in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. The results indicated that the number of total bacteria and coliform count on teat skin showed 2.11×104 and 1.54×101 CFU/ml, respectively. A higher number of total bacteria and coliform count were >2.50×104 and >5.10×103 CFU/ml, respectively, were reported from a previous study [23]. The differences in the sample area, environmental condition, and teat sanitation are possibly the causes for this variation [24]. The bacterial colonization on teat skin is an important source for intramammary infection [25]. Good sanitation practices can reduce the number of bacteria on teat skin and improve the milk quality, especially the pre-milking and post-milking teat dip [26,27].

The MIC and the MBC determination

Broth microdilution methods have been used in the determination of MIC and MBC values. The MIC and MBC values of E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli field strains toward lactic acid were 0.5%. The MIC and MBC against all E. coli was 0.5% v/v. Lactic acid MBC to MIC ratios of E.coli was 1. This value <4 was indicated as bactericidal activity [28]. The previous results showed that the lactic acid inhibited the growth of other Gram-negative bacteria such as Shigella sp., Salmonella Enteritidis, and Listeria monocytogenes at 0.5% [29,30]. The other prior study reported that MIC and MBC of lactic acid against Gram-negative bacteria were ≥0.125% and ≥0.25%, respectively [31]. The difference between MIC and MBC was depended on bacteria strain tested and the concentration of lactic acid [32].

Characterization of modified rice gel containing lactic acid preparation

The rice gel containing 5% lactic acid was successfully prepared. The formulation composed of lactic acid, rice gel, sodium chloride, and water. The property of this preparation was homogeneous, slightly air bubble, easy flow, and clear of color (Table-1). After 1 year that storage at 4°C, the pH and color of natural gel preparation were change to 2.65 and pale yellow, respectively. Topical gel is easily passed through skin, convenient to apply and more selectively to a specific site. An adhesive property is important for increasing time at the epithelium surface. The dosage form is suitable for applying in antiseptic teat dip. In addition, the topical formulation added the moisture for hydrating skin with their emollient properties [33].

Table-1.

Characterization of a natural gel containing 5% lactic acid.

Property 5% NGL
Freshly prepared After 1 year of storage at 4°C
Appearance Homogeneous Homogeneous
Flow Easy Easy
Air bubble Slightly None
Color Clear Pale yellow
pH 2.54 2.65
Open in a new tab

NGL: Natural gel lactic acid

The time-kill kinetic assay

Time-kill analysis was performed to evaluate the killing time of E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli field strain. The killing effect of 5% NGL was shown in Figure-1. The result demonstrated log reductions with E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli field strain of 3 and 2 log CFU/ml (32.77% and 27.58%) after 60 min exposure time to 5% NGL, respectively. Figure-1 shows a graph of the linear equation, with the slope of E. coli ATCC 25922 which had the most negative slope (k=−0.0378). The results indicated that the 5% NGL has antimicrobial ability against Gram-negative bacteria causing bovine mastitis. However, a low number of coliform were observed on teat skin (1.54×101 CFU/ml). The efficiency of 5% NGL is able to against E. coli on teat skin bacteria. From a previous study, lactic acid has been reported to reduce the population of E. coli [34,35]. The incomplete killing rate may be related to the duration of exposure time.

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Open in a new tab

The killing rate of 5% natural gel lactic acid against (a) Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and (b) E. coli field strain. Vertical bars represent the means±standard deviation. The line shown in the graph of the linear equation. Asterisk (*) means significant differences in bacterial count at p≤0.05.

SEM of bacterial morphology

An appearance under SEM of viable E. coli in NSS without lactic acid as culture control is shown in Figure-2a. The untreated cells demonstrated typical rod shape with round end and smooth cell surfaces. The non-viable E. coli incubated with 1% v/v of lactic acid is shown in Figure-2b. After incubation with a lethal concentration of lactic acid, E. coli underwent significant morphological changes from rod shape to atypical form and rough surface cell membrane. Most of the studies about the mechanism of antibacterial lactic acid on Gram-negative bacteria focused on their effects on cellular membranes [16,36]. The flagella of E. coli are driven by the proton-motive force. From the previous study, the effect of weak acid on rotational speed of E. coli motors with intracellular pH was investigated [37]. When the external pH set at 5.0, the motor stopped completely. In this study, the pH of 5% NGL formulation was approximately 2.54. The impairment of flagella of E. coli is also found to be related to acidic pH. At acidic pH, the expression level of the flagellin-encoding gene was decreased as compared to neutral pH [38].

Figure-2.

Figure-2

Open in a new tab

Scanning electron micrographs of Escherichia coli after incubation at 37°C for 8 h: (a) Viable cells (20,000×) in normal saline solution without lactic acid; (b) non-viable cells (20,000×) with 1% v/v lactic acid.

Conclusion

The results of the present study show that the rice gel containing 5% v/v of lactic acid possesses antibacterial activity against E. coli. Our results demonstrate that the MIC and MBC of lactic acid for E. coli were 0.5%. The natural gel preparation did not change during storage at 4°C over a period of 1 year. The product formulation reduced the rate of E. coli, which means that it can play an important role in preventing new intramammary infection. It can be an alternative choice due to safe, biodegradable, and restrictions on the use of antibiotics.

Authors’ Contributions

SO prepared the natural rice gel. RM designed the model and the computational framework. RC and RM performed the laboratory investigation. RC and KNL analyzed the data. SP and PS supported material equipment and teat skin collection. RC and RM drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Agriculture Research Development Agency, Thailand (Foundation Number: CRP 5905010750).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

References

  • 1.Islam M.A, Islam M.Z, Islam M.A, Rahman M.S, Islam M.T. Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh. J. Vet. Med. 2011;9(1):73–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Plozza K, Lievaart J.J, Potts G, Barkema H.W. Subclinical mastitis and associated risk factors on dairy farms in New South Wales. Aust. Vet. J. 2011;89(1-2):41–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharma N, Rho G.J, Hong Y.H, Kang T.Y, Lee H.K, Hur T.Y, Jeong D.K. Bovine mastitis:An Asian perspective. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012;7(6):2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bunch K.J, Heneghan D.J.S, Hibbitt K.G, Rowllands G.J. Genetic influences in clinical mastitis and its relationship with milk yield, season and stage of lactation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1984;11(1):91–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bartlett P.C, Agger J.F, Houe H, Lawson L.G. Incidence of clinical mastitis in Danish dairy cattle and screening for non-reporting in a passively collected national surveillance system. Prev. Vet. Med. 2001;48(2):73–83. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00192-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang F, Zhang S.D, Shang X.F, Wang X.R, Wang L, Yanh Z.T, Li H.S. Prevalence and characteristics of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from bovine mastitis cases in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2018;17(6):1246–1251. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bhat A.M, Soodan J.S, Singh R, Dhobi I.A, Hussain T, Dar M.Y, Mir M. Incidence of bovine clinical mastitis in Jammu region and antibiogram of isolated pathogens. Vet. World. 2017;10(8):984–989. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.984-989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Navaneethan R, Saravanan S, Suresh P, Ponnuswamy K.K, Palanivel K.M. Prevalence of clinical mastitis due to E. coli in bovines. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017;6(10):405–409. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sancak Y.C, Sancak H, Isleyici O, Durmaz H. Presence of Escherichia coli O157 and O157:H7 in raw milk and van herby cheese. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy. 2015;59(4):511–514. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oliver S.P, Murinda S.E. Antimicrobial resistance of mastitis pathogens. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2012;28(2):165–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nickerson S.C. Choosing the Best Teat Dip for Mastitis Control and Milk Quality. Proceedings NMC-PDPW Milk Quality Conference. 2001:43–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boonyayatra S, Chaisri W. Incidence and prevalence of subclinical mastitis in smallholder dairy farms of Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Chiang Mai Vet. J. 2004;1(2):25–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ajariyakhajorn K, Samngamnim S, Boonserm T, Inchaisri C, Thirapatsakun T, Farnsworth R.J. Mastitis in Small Dairy Holders of Nakhonpathom Province, Thailand. The 11thInternational Symposium of the World Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians and OIE Seminar on Biotechnology. 2003 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suriyasathaporn W, Chupia V. Reduction in numbers of bacteria after pre-milking teat dipping in milking dairy cows. CMU. J. Nat. Sci. 2011;10(2):301–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gleeson D, O'Brien B, Flynn J, O'Callaghan E, Galli F. Effect of pre-milking teat preparation procedures on the microbial count on teats prior to cluster application. Ir. Vet. J. 2009;62(7):461–467. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-62-7-461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boomsma B, Bikker E, Lansdaal E, Stuut P. L-lactic acid a safe antimicrobial for home and personal care formulations. Sofw J. 2015;10(141):2–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alsaheb R.A.A, Aladdin1 A, Othman N.Z, Malek R.A, Leng O.M, Aziz R, Enshasy H.A.E. Lactic acid applications in pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2015;7(10):729–735. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sadakane K, Ichinose T. Effect of the hand antiseptic agents benzalkonium chloride, povidone-iodine, ethanol, and chlorhexidine gluconate on atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2015;12(2):116–125. doi: 10.7150/ijms.10322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rowbotham R.F, Ruegg P.L. Bacterial counts on teat skin and in new sand, recycled sand, and recycled manure solids used as bedding in freestalls. J. Dairy Sci. 2016;99(8):6594–6608. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.3M Corporation. Aerobic Count Plate Interpretation Guide. St. Paul: 3M Corporation; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okonogi S, Kaewpinta A, Yotsawimonwat S, Khongkhunthian S. Preparation and characterization of lidocaine rice gel for oral application. Drug Discov. Ther. 2015;9(6):397–403. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2015.01065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chotigarpa R, Na Lampang K, Pikulkaew S, Okonogi S, Ajariyakhajorn K, Mektrirat R. Inhibitory effects and killing kinetics of lactic acid rice gel against pathogenic bacteria causing bovine mastitis. Sci. Pharm. 2018;86(3):1–10. doi: 10.3390/scipharm86030029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baumberger C, Guarín J.F, Ruegg P.L. Effect of 2 different premilking teat sanitation routines on reduction of bacterial counts on teat skin of cows on commercial dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2016;99(4):1–15. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mbuk E.U, Kwaga J.K.P, Bale J.O.O, Boro L.A, Umoh J.U. Coliform organisms associated with milk of cows with mastitis and their sensitivity to commonly available antibiotics in Kaduna State, Nigeria. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health. 2016;8(12):228–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hassan R, Kudi C.A, Chiezey N.P, Rekwot P.I, Egbodo B.E, Samuel F.U, Maikaji F.S, Bello T.K. Mastitis causing pathogens within the environment and teats of milking cows in Zaria, Kaduna state. J. Anim. Prod. Res. 2016;28(1):8–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kučević D, Plavšić M, Trivunović S, Radinović M, Kučević D.S. Effect of post-milking teat dipping on hygienic quality of cow's milk. Biotechnol. Anim. Husbandry. 2013;29(4):665–673. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gleeson D, Flynn J, O'Brien B. Effect of pre-milking teat disinfection on new mastitis infection rates of dairy cows. Ir Vet J. 2018;71(11):11. doi: 10.1186/s13620-018-0122-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haas W, Pillar C.M, Hesje C.K, Sanfilippo C.M, Morris T.W. Bactericidal activity of besifloxacin against staphylococci Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenza. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010;65(7):1441–1447. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang C, Chang T, Yang H, Cui M. Antibacterial mechanism of lactic acid on physiological and morphological properties of Salmonella Enteritidis Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control. 2015;47(1):31–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.In Y.W, Kim J.J, Kim H.J, Oh S.W. Antimicrobial activities of acetic acid, citric acid and lactic acid against Shigella species. J. Food. Saf. 2013;33(1):79–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nikolić S.S, Dimić G, Mojović L, Pejin J, Vuković A.D, Tanackov S.K. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid against pathogen and spoilage microorganisms. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016;40(5):990–998. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sobhy H.M, Moghazy G.M.E, A'al M.H.A, Ibrahim H.E, Hamouda M.S. Using lactic acid as an antimicrobial against Pseudomonas aeroginosa and validation of its test method by LC-MS/MS. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2017;5(11):111–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verma A, Singh S, Kaur R, Jain U.K. Topical gels as drug delivery systems:A review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2013;23(2):374–382. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hussain G, Rahman A, Hussain T, Uddin S, Ali T. Citric and lactic acid on the growth inhibition of E. coli and Salmonella Typhimuriumon beef during storage. Sarhad J. Agric. 2015;31(3):183–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Raftari M, Jalilian F.A, Abdulamir A.S, Son R, Sekawi Z, Fatimah A.B. Effect of organic acids on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus contaminated meat. Open Microbiol. J. 2009;3(1):121–127. doi: 10.2174/1874285800903010121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Alakomi H.L, Skyttä E, Saarela M, Mattila-Sandholm T, Latva-Kala K, Helander I.M. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66(5):2001–2005. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.5.2001-2005.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Minamino T, Imae Y, Oosawa F, Kobayashi Y, Oosawa K. Effect of intracellular pH on rotational speed of bacterial flagellar motors. J. Bacteriol. 2002;185(4):1190–1194. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.4.1190-1194.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maurer L.M, Yohannes E, Bondurant S.S, Radmacher M, Slonczewski J.L. pH regulates genes for flagellar motility, catabolism, and oxidative stress in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187(1):304–319. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.1.304-319.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES