Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2019 Jan 7;145(1):70–77. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32077

The relationship between terminal duct lobular unit features and mammographic density among Chinese breast cancer patients

Hyuna Sung 1,2,#, Changyuan Guo 3,#, Erni Li 3,#, Jing Li 3, Ruth M Pfeiffer 1, Jennifer L Guida 1, Renata Cora 4, Nan Hu 1, Joseph Deng 1, Jonine D Figueroa 1,5, Mark E Sherman 1,6, Gretchen L Gierach 1, Ning Lu 3,#, Xiaohong R Yang 1,#
PMCID: PMC6488407  NIHMSID: NIHMS1004901  PMID: 30561789

Abstract

Extensive mammographic density (MD), a well-established breast cancer risk factor, is a radiological representation of stromal and epithelial breast tissue content. In studies conducted predominantly among Caucasian women, histologic measures of reduced terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution have been correlated with extensive MD, but independently associated with breast cancer risk. We therefore examined associations between TDLU measures and MD among Chinese women, a low-risk population but with high prevalence of dense breasts. Diagnostic pre-treatment digital mammograms were obtained from 144 breast cancer cases at a tertiary hospital in Beijing and scored using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. TDLU features were assessed using three standardized measures (count/100mm2, span [µm], and acini count/TDLU) in benign tissues. Associations between each of TDLU measures and MD were examined using generalized linear models for TDLU count and span and polytomous logistic regression for acini count with adjustment for potential confounders stratified by age. Among women ≥50 years, 63% had dense breasts; cases with dense breast (BI-RADS, c-d) had greater TDLU count (21.1 [SE=2.70] vs 9.0 [SE=1.83]; P=0.0004), longer span (480.6µm [SE=24.6] vs 393.8µm [SE=31.8]; P=0.03), and greater acini count (ORtrend=16.1; 95%CI=4.08–63.1; Ptrend<0.0001) compared to those with non-dense breasts (BI-RADS, a-b). Among women <50 years, 91% had dense breasts, precluding our ability to detect associations. Our findings are consistent with previously reported associations between extensive MD and reduced TDLU involution, supporting the hypothesis that breast cancer risk associated with extensive MD may be related to the amount of at-risk epithelium.

Keywords: terminal ductal lobular unit (TDLU) involution, mammographic density, BI-RADS, China, breast cancer

Introduction

Mammographic density (MD) is a radiological representation of stromal and epithelial breast tissue content and extensive MD is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer.1, 2 Several studies have provided insight into the underlying mechanism of the MD and breast cancer risk association by examining histologic features of breast tissues.36 Terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution is a histological measure of breast tissue characterized by a reduction in the epithelial component with aging.7 Less extent of involution, characterized by greater number and size of observed TDLUs, has been associated with higher breast cancer risk among women with benign breast diseases.810 Previous studies conducted predominantly among white women using diagnostic biopsy specimens for benign breast diseases have demonstrated that reduced TDLU involution was associated with higher MD 35: women with no or partial involution were more likely to have higher percent MD or dense parenchymal patterns than those with complete involution 3. This association was subsequently replicated using standardized quantitative measures of TDLU involution 4. Contrary to these reports, a recent analysis of breast cancer cases within the Multiethnic Cohort, which was highly enriched for women of Japanese ancestry (43%) and included participants who were older (mean age 59.7 years) and thinner than in other studies showed the opposite direction of the association (i.e., greater TDLU involution associated with higher dense area) 6. The explanation of this finding is unresolved but may suggest potential racial variation in the TDLU-MD relationship.

Although these measures from the histologic (i.e., TDLU involution) and the radiologic (i.e., MD) assessments of breast tissues are correlated, increased TDLU involution has been associated with lower breast cancer risk independently of the MD9, 11, suggesting that the relationship between TDLU involution and MD, and their associations with breast cancer risk are more complex. To date, most studies of MD in relation to TDLU features, including the one in Multiethnic Cohort6, have been conducted among Western populations. Therefore, we examined the relationship between MD and TDLU features in non-neoplastic breast tissues from breast cancer patients in China, where breast cancer incidence rates are historically low and the prevalence of dense breasts and other breast cancer risk factors are substantially different from high-risk populations in Western countries12, 13 .

Materials and Methods

Study population

We utilized data from a previously conducted TDLU evaluation which included 504 invasive breast cancer cases with luminal A and triple-negative tumors treated at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CHCAMS), Beijing, China, between 2009 and 2012, as previously described in detail.14 In brief, eligible cases included those who had a confirmed breast cancer diagnosis, complete pathology data, and no neoadjuvant therapies prior to surgeries. The majority of these patients (>90%) were symptomatic and very few were detected through physical-exams or screening. We restricted the analysis to 144 cases who were diagnosed between 2011 and 2012 and whose diagnostic mammograms were available. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with and without BI-RADs data were shown in Supplementary Table 1. Breast cancer risk factors were extracted from medical records, which included age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), age at menarche, number of children, breastfeeding (yes or no), and first-degree family history of breast cancer. Pathology data including TNM stage, grade, and expression levels of ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, and EGFR were retrieved from pathology reports. The status of ER, PR, CK5/6, and EGFR expression in tumors was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and >1% staining was considered as positive. HER2 expression was determined by IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and either IHC 3+ or FISH-positive was defined as HER2 positive. To avoid misclassification, we excluded all HER2 2+ cases without FISH data. Luminal A tumors (n=95) were defined as ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-, and negative for both basal markers and triple-negative as ER-, PR-, and HER2-. The triple-negative group (n=49) was enriched with basal-marker positive tumors (n=39). The project was approved by the CHCAMS Ethics Committee and informed consent was not required for the use of existing pathological materials with no reveal of identifiable patient information. The study was also exempted from review by the Office of Human Subject Research Protections at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) since NIH investigators working with data do not have abilities to identify the subjects from whom the specimens or data originated (Exempt Number: 11751).

Histologic assessment of TDLUs

The methods for histologic review and TDLU annotation were previously described in detail.14 In brief, tissue sections prepared from grossly benign breast tissue at the time of mastectomy were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and scanned to create digital image files. Cases with low-quality images or benign changes throughout the section (duct dilation, metaplasia, hyperplasia, microscopic evidence of ductal carcinoma in situ, or invasive cancer) were excluded. We used three standardized TDLU measures previously shown to have high intra/intra reader reproducibility 4, 10, 15: TDLU count per unit area (count/100 mm2), TDLU span (measured with an electronic ruler in microns, µm), and acini count per TDLU, as an indication for involution (with higher levels of all 3 measures indicating lower levels of TDLU involution) 15. Among women with observable normal TDLUs, up to 10 sequential TDLUs were evaluated for acini count/TDLU (categories: 1, 2–10; 2, 11–20; 3, 21–30; 4, 31–50; 5, 51–100; and 6, >100) and TDLU span (median diameter of a TDLU in µm). For each sample, the median values of acini count/TDLU and TDLU span were used as summary measures. All TDLU measurements were performed by a single trained cytotechnologist (R. Cora).

MD assessment

All digital diagnostic mammograms were acquired on GE Senographe DS full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system at CHCAMS. FFDM images were retrospectively evaluated by a board-certified radiologist (EL) using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) guidelines recommended by the American College of Radiology (5th edition)16 and categorized into four levels using the BI-RADS breast composition scoring system (almost entirely fatty (a), scattered areas of fibroglandular density (b), heterogeneously dense (c), and extremely dense (d)). BI-RADS readings for the two breasts within one woman showed very high correlations (>0.95) and we used the maximal values for BI-RADS density categories across the two breasts in subsequent analyses. For quality control assessment, images for all 144 cases were independently read by four other senior breast radiologists with each reading a subset. Average inter-observer agreement based on k-statistics was 0.66 (range of weighted kappa=0.59–0.70) on a four-grade scale and 0.73 (range of kappa=0.61–0.83) on a two-grade scale (a-b or c-d). The reading from EL was used in the subsequent analyses since the consistency was comparable to a previously published study 17.

Statistical Analyses

Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between TDLU measures (raw TDLU count, median TDLU span, and median category of acini count/TDLU) and risk factors such as age, BMI (kg/m2), age at menarche, and number of children (0 for nulliparous women) (Supplementary Table 2). Associations between MD and risk factors or clinical characteristics were evaluated using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test wherever appropriate. Local polynomial regression based on LOWESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing) was used to estimate and visualize the average TDLU count as a function of age in dense (BI-RADS, c-d) and non-dense (BI-RADS, a-b) breast groups, separately.

To examine the association between TDLU measures and MD, we used generalized linear models for continuous TDLU measures (count and span) and polytomous logistic regression for the ordinal TDLU measure (acini count). Because TDLU count was not normally distributed, we used double square-root transformed TDLU count (normalized TDLU count/100 mm2) to better approximate normal distribution in the further statistical tests. Generalized linear models were conducted using PROC GLM (SAS) to estimate least square means and standard errors (SE) of TDLU count or span (outcome) by BI-RADS density (independent variable, 4 categories in the overall analysis and 2 categories [dense: BI-RADS, c-d vs. non-dense: BI-RADS, a-b] in the age-stratified analysis) with adjusting for potential confounders. The first model included age (5-year frequency) and BMI (<23, 23–24.9, 25+ kg/m2) as covariates, two variables that are known to be strongly associated with both MD and TDLU measures. The second model additionally included age at menarche (<14 (median), ≥14 years), parity (nulliparous, parous), and tumor subtype (luminal A, triple-negative) as covariates based on observed correlations with TDLU measures and/or MD. For TDLU count and span, the least square means and SEs were back transformed to raw values and presented. Polytomous logistic regression was used to examine the association between BI-RADS density (independent variable) and median category of acini count (dependent variable, categorized into tertiles) adjusting for potential confounders. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to compare the 2nd and 3rd categories to the 1st category of acini count. We also examined the trend in association across tertiles of acini count. Since the association between TDLU measures and MD may vary by menopausal status4, 15, all analyses were done for all women combined as well as for women stratified by age (<50 and ≥50 years, a proxy for menopausal status). We also formally tested the interaction of age (5-year interval or <50 and ≥50 years) and MD in relation to TDLU measures by including a product term of age variable and MD in the model. The interaction was not statistically significant and therefore was not included in the final model. Lowess function was conducted using Stata/SE (version 11.2; StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Graphs for descriptive statistics of TDLU measures were generated using Origin (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). All other analyses were conducted using SAS (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All statistical tests were two-sided and considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Table 1 shows selected characteristics including distribution of TDLU measures and BI-RADS by age group. The mean (SD) age was 42.3 (5.4) for younger cases (<50 years, n=80) and 57.2 (5.3) for older cases (≥ 50 years, n=64). The mean BMI was similar in younger and older women (24.8 vs. 25.0; P=0.76). Compared to younger women, older women were more likely to have later age at menarche (14+: 32.3% vs 13%; P=0.03) and more children (>1: 39.7% vs 21.8%; P=0.04). Older women also tended to have less and smaller TDLUs (P<0.05 for all three TDLU measures) and a lower frequency of dense breasts (BI-RADS, c-d; 62.5% vs. 91.3%; P<0.0001). Supplementary Table 2 shows the correlation between TDLU measures and patient characteristics. All three TDLU measures were strongly correlated with one another (r2= 0.69 to 0.82; P<0.0001) and inversely correlated with age (r2= −0.53 to −0.48; P<0.0001). Similar age associations were found for both non-dense (BI-RADS, a-b) and dense (BI-RADS, c-d) breast groups (Figure 1) and for both luminal A and triple-negative cases (Supplementary Figure 1).

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of breast cancer cases in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CHCAMS), overall and by age (n=144)

Overall (n=144) Age<50 (n=80) Age≥50 (n=64) Pa
  n % n % n %
Age
  Mean, SD 48.9 9.2 42.3 5.4 57.2 5.3 -
  20–39 20 13.9 20 25.0 - -
  40–49 60 41.7 60 75.0 - -
  50–59 50 34.7 - - 50 78.1
  60–79 14 9.7 - - 14 21.9
Body mass index
  Mean, SD 24.9 3.5 24.8 3.6 25.0 3.5 0.76
  <23 45 31.3 29 36.3 16 25.0 0.4
  23–24.9 33 22.9 16 20.0 17 26.6
  25–29.9 57 39.6 29 36.3 28 43.8
  30+ 9 6.3 6 7.5 3 4.7
Family history of breast cancer
  No 136 94.4 74 92.5 62 96.9 0.30
  Yes 8 5.6 6 7.5 2 3.1
Age at menarche
  Mean, SD 14.6 1.8 14.2 1.4 15.1 2.1 0.04
  <12 41 29.5 25 32.5 16 25.8 0.03
  12–13 68 48.9 42 54.6 26 41.9
  14+ 30 21.6 10 13.0 20 32.3
  Missing 5 3 2
Parity/Number of children
  Mean, SD 1.37 0.8 1.18 0.6 1.60 0.9 0.01
  Nulliparous 6 4.26 5 6.4 1 1.6 0.04
  1 Child 93 66.0 56 71.8 37 58.7
  More than 1 Child 42 29.8 17 21.8 25 39.7
  Missing 3 2 1
Breastfeedingb
  No 5 5.1 4 7.0 1 2.4 0.4
  Yes 94 95.0 53 93.0 41 97.6
  Missing 36   16 20    
Tumor subtype
  Triple-negative/Core-basal phenotype 49 34.0 27 33.8 22 34.4 0.94
  luminal A 95 66.0 53 66.3 42 65.6
Tumor size
  ≤2cm 89 62.2 50 62.5 39 61.9 0.94
  >2cm 54 37.8 30 37.5 24 38.1
  Missing 1 0 1
Lymph node invasion
  Negative 86 61.4 46 58.2 40 65.6 0.38
  Positive 54 38.6 33 41.8 21 34.4
  Missing 4 1 3
Grade
  Well differentiated 20 15.0 10 13.0 10 17.9 0.72
  Moderately differentiated 63 47.4 38 49.4 25 44.6
  Poorly differentiated 50 37.6 29 37.7 21 37.5
  Missing 11 3 8
TDLU involution measures (median, range)
  TDLU count/100mm2 20.4 1.4 to 128.9 29.0 1.4 to 91.4 15.2 2.0 to 128.9 <0.0001
  Median span (µm) 534.3 177.0 to 1162.5 614.8 177.0 to 1162.5 410.0 200.0 to 817.5 <0.0001
  Median category of acini count/TDLUc
  1–1.5 46 31.9 11 13.8 35 54.7 <0.0001
  2–2.5 49 34.0 29 36.3 20 31.3
  3–5 49 34.0 40 50.0 9 14.1
BI-RADS density
  a, almost entirely fatty 9 6.3 1 1.3 8 12.5 <0.0001
  b, scattered areas of fibroglandular density 22 15.3 6 7.5 16 25.0
  c, heterogeneously dense 66 45.8 36 45.0 30 46.9
  d, extremely dense 47 32.6 37 46.3 10 15.6  

BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BMI body mass index, SD standard deviation, TDLU terminal duct lobular unit

a

T-test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables; Chi-squared or Fisher’s Exact test for categorical variables

b

Parous women only

c

Categories for acini count/TDLU: 1, 2–10; 2, 11–20; 3, 21–30; 4, 31–50; 5, 51–100

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Estimated TDLU counts per 100 mm2 by age based on LOWESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing) stratified by BI-RADS density (a-b vs c-d) *The normalized values of TDLU count based on double square-root transformation were used for local polynomial regression and back-transformed to the original values for visualization.

Among all women combined, median values of TDLU count tended to increase with increasing BI-RADS density (Figure 2). A similar trend was observed among older but not younger women in age-stratified analyses. Similarly, median values of TDLU span were also greater in cases with dense (BI-RADS, c-d) than non-dense (BI-RADS, a-b) breasts, and the difference was again stronger among older women (Supplementary Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of TDLU counts per 100 mm2 by BI-RADS density, overall and by age

Table 2 shows estimated TDLU count and median TDLU span by BI-RADS density categories with the adjustment for potential confounders. Among all women combined, number of TDLU count per 100 mm2 and median span increased with increasing BI-RADS category from entirely fatty breast (BI-RADS, a) to heterogeneously dense (BI-RADS, c) but slightly declined in patients with the extremely dense breast (BI-RADS, d). However, the test for trend was not significant in either age- and BMI-adjusted model or the full model. Among younger women (age<50 years), which only included 7 participants with low MD, TDLU count and span did not vary significantly by MD. In contrast, among older women (age≥ 50 years), women with dense breasts compared to non-dense breast had significantly greater number of TDLUs per 100 mm2 (21.1 [SE=2.7] vs 9.0 [SE=1.8]; P=0.0004) and median span (480.6 µm [SE=24.6] vs 393.8 µm [SE=31.8]; P=0.03). The association of acini count with BI-RADS density showed a similar trend (Supplementary Table 3), with women of dense breast associated with greater acini count per TDLU among older women (ORtrend=16.1; 95% CI=4.1–63.1; Ptrend<0.0001; comparing higher category to lower category) but not among younger women (ORtrend=1.1; 95% CI=0.2–5.6; Ptrend=0.92).

Table 2.

Associations between TDLU measures (count per 100mm2 and median span) and BI-RADS density, overall and by age

n Meana SEa Meanb SEb
TDLU count/100mm2
  Overall
    BI-RADS, a 9 14.7 4.2 14.2 4.1
    BI-RADS, b 22 17.1 2.9 17.2 2.9
    BI-RADS, c 66 25.9 2.2 25.9 2.4
    BI-RADS, d 47 21.1 2.4 21.3 2.5
Ptrend 0.17 0.15
  Age<50
    BI-RADS, a-b 7 32.3 7.7 31.9 7.9
    BI-RADS, c-d 73 27.1 2.0 27.3 2.2
    P 0.58 0.66
  Age≥50
    BI-RADS, a-b 24 10.0 1.9 9.0 1.8
    BI-RADS, c-d 40 21.1 2.6 21.1 2.7
    P   0.001   0.0004  
Median TDLU span (µm)
  Overall
    BI-RADS, a 9 540.1 67.6 531.0 69.0
    BI-RADS, b 22 495.9 40.8 499.6 42.0
    BI-RADS, c 66 589.2 23.2 592.8 24.8
    BI-RADS, d 47 544.9 29.6 548.7 30.1
    Ptrend 0.55 0.49
  Age<50
    BI-RADS, a-b 7 601.4 84.6 588.2 88.5
    BI-RADS, c-d 73 642.7 24.9 653.7 27.1
    P 0.64 0.49
  Age≥50
    BI-RADS, a-b 24 399.1 30.3 393.8 31.8
    BI-RADS, c-d 40 483.0 23.2 480.6 24.6
    P   0.03 0.03  

BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BMI, body mass index, SE standard error, TDLU terminal duct lobular unit

a

Adjusted for age (5-year), BMI (<23, 23–24.9, and ≥25 kg/m2)

b

Adjusted for age (5-year), BMI (<23, 23–24.9, and ≥25 kg/m2), parity (nulliparous, parous), age at menarche (<14, ≥14), and tumor subtype (luminal and TN).

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study examining the relationship between BI-RADS density and TDLU features using surgically removed benign tissue samples from Chinese breast cancer patients, we found that women with denser breasts were more likely to show greater TDLU count, median TDLU span, and acini count per TDLU, reflecting less extent of involution, particularly among older women. Despite the differences in study populations, tissue type, and approaches to measure MD and TDLU involution, we observed a similar direction for the MD-TDLU association as in two previously published studies 3, 4 conducted among Caucasian women, supporting the hypothesis that MD associated breast cancer risk may partially be mediated through the abundance of at-risk epithelium.

In the Mayo Benign Disease Cohort study (Mayo), using biopsy specimens of women with benign breast disease (BBD), Ghosh et al. showed that women with no or partial involution were more likely to have extensive MD than those with complete involution 3. The association was replicated using quantitative MD area measurement in the same study 3. In a recent study using data from the STAMP project, where benign biopsy tissues were annotated with more standardized and quantitative TDLU measures, the relationship of denser breast tissues with lesser degrees of TDLU involution was confirmed 4. In contrast, a report from Multiethnic Cohort showed that greater TDLU involution assessed in adjacent non-tumor breast tissue was not related to lower MD but was associated with a higher MD area 6. There may be several reasons to explain these conflicting results, such as the heterogeneity in the assessment of TDLU involution (standardized quantitative vs. semi-quantitative methods) and MD (BI-RADS vs. continuous measures), tissue source (women with BBD vs. women with breast cancer) or racial groups (white women in Mayo and STAMP vs. more diverse populations in Multiethnic Cohort [43% Japanese American and 35% Caucasians]). Further, women in the Multiethnic Cohort were older (69% postmenopausal), reported past or current hormone replacement therapy user (65%), and thinner than in other studies. Interestingly, our study design was more similar to that of the Multiethnic Cohort6 in that we also used surgically removed benign breast tissues from cancer patients for the evaluation of TDLU features, while the Mayo BBD cohort study 3 and the STAMP project 4 used benign tissues from women with BBD.

Consistent with what was reported in the STAMP study 4, which used the same three quantitative metrics for TDLU assessment as in the current study, we found that TDLU count had a stronger association with MD compared to TDLU span. However, in contrast to the null association between acini count and percent MD in the STAMP study, we observed significant associations between all three TDLU measures and MD, albeit with wide confidence limits. To tease out whether there is a specific TDLU feature(s) that might show stronger association with MD, we analyzed MD as an outcome variable and all three TDLU measures as explanatory variables with the adjustment of the same set of covariates among older women. We found that the association for acini count remained statistically significant while the associations for the two other measures became non-significant (data not shown), suggesting that the acini count may better reflect the at-risk epithelium and capture the MD association.

In addition, while the STAMP study reported significant association only among premenopausal women,4 we observed a significant association only among older women. The lack of association among younger women in our study could be due to the insufficient power, given that the vast majority of younger women in our study had dense breasts (BI-RADS, c-d; 91%, n=73). Alternatively, the association between TDLU involution and MD may vary by race or ethnicity in relation to age interaction since both MD and TDLU features are influenced by common factors such as age, BMI, and hormonal exposures and the impacts of these factors may vary by race/ethnicity. For example, a longitudinal analysis showed that the age-related decline of percent mammographic density was slower among Japanese women compared to Caucasians.18 In addition, studies conducted among Asian women showed that the association between MD and breast cancer risk was stronger among postmenopausal women than premenopausal women.19,20

Variations in breast size and tissue composition across different populations may also affect the association between MD and TDLU features differently. Although not always consistent, studies comparing racial differences in MD suggest that Asian women have higher percent MD but smaller absolute dense area/volume and breast size compared to Western women after accounting for well-known MD determinants such as age and BMI.2126 It is also notable that intact TDLU structures were persistent even in very old women (up to age 79 years) in our study, whereas a high proportion of subjects showed complete involution among younger women (zero TDLU count: 25%; 40–65 years) in the STAMP study.4, 27 In addition, while we found strong correlations of all three TDLU measures (all Spearman’s rho>0.63; Supplementary Table 2), previous studies reported a strong correlation between TDLU size measures (acini count and span) but a weaker correlation of TDLU count with either size measure (all Spearman’s rho<0.18).4, 27 Future studies using quantitative density in area and volumetric measures among women from diverse racial background are needed to clarify the racial variation in MD-TDLU relationship.

Our study adds new information on the relationship between TDLU features and MD among Asian women, in which breast composition features are unique, but have not been well studied. However, several limitations should be considered to interpret our results. First, we evaluated MD and TDLU features in benign tissues from breast cancer cases, which may be systematically different from those without cancers. Nevertheless, our observation is largely consistent with what was previously reported based on benign tissues from healthy women, despite the potential changes that may have occurred in adjacent-normal tissue in cancer cases. Second, the selection of patients was based on the availability of data with both TDLU measures and BI-RADS density. Several demographic and tumor characteristics, including age, tumor subtype, and grade, and TDLU measures varied between selected and unselected cases (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, we only included luminal and TN patients with MD data in this analysis and patients seen at this tertiary hospital may not represent the general breast cancer population in China, which limits the generalizability of our findings. Third, we used BI-RADS for MD assessment, which is subjective and is known to vary across radiologists 28. In addition, BI-RADS density is a categorical MD measurement based on a two-dimensional view; quantitative measurements assessing different density in three-dimensional views or via volumetric approaches may provide more accurate estimates for the association between specific TDLU features and MD measures. Fourth, the information on hormone-replacement therapy among postmenopausal women, which is known to influence both TDLU involution and MD, is limited in this study population. However, the prevalence of hormone-replacement therapy use is very low among Chinese women (2.1%)29, which is unlikely to have caused a significant bias in the observed associations. Lastly, our sample size is small, which limited the power to address how breast cancer risk factors or breast tumor subtypes may influence the MD-involution association. In summary, in this study of Chinse breast cancer patients, we found that breast cancer cases with dense breasts were more likely to show greater TDLU count, median span, and acini count per TDLU, particularly among older women. The observed associations between MD and TDLU measures are generally consistent with what has been previously observed among Caucasian populations 3, 4. These results suggest that MD and TDLU features may be influenced by common factors and associated with similar biological processes, but the co-regulation of these two features may vary at different ages according to dynamic changes in the morphometric patterns of breast tissue. Our findings also highlight the importance of investigating the biological mechanisms underlying MD and TDLU features in diverse populations where morphometric features as well as their interactions with genetic and non-genetic risk factors may be different from Western populations.

Supplementary Material

Supp Figures

Supplementary Figure 1. Estimated TDLU counts per 100 mm2 by age based on LOWESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing) stratified by by BI-RADS density and tumor subtype: BI-RADS a-b; luminal A (n=19); BI-RADS c-d, luminal A (n=76); BI-RADS a-b, triple-negative (n=12); BI-RADS c-d, triple-negative (n=37)

Supplementary Figure 2. Distribution of median span (µm) of 10 TDLUs by BI-RADS density in all cases and by age group

Supp Tables

Novelty and Impact:

Most epidemiologic findings on terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution in relation to breast cancer were from studies in Caucasian women. Using the standardized TDLU quantifiers assessed in benign tissues from breast cancer cases accompanied by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System density classification data from a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China, we extended the previous finding of the association between dense breast and greater number and size of TDLUs to an Asian population. Our finding supports the hypothesis that the higher amount of ‘at-risk’ epithelium may in part mediate the association between extensive breast density and breast cancer risk.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.

Acknowledgements:

The authors acknowledge Michael Stagner at Information Management Systems for data management support.

Abbreviations:

BBD

benign breast disease

BI-RADS

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System

BMI

body mass index

CK5/6

Cytokeratin 5/6

EGFR

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

ER

Estrogen receptor

FISH

fluorescence in situ hybridization

HER2

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2

IHC

immunohistochemistry

MD

mammographic density

OR

odds ratio

PR

Progesterone receptor

SD

standard deviation

SE

standard error

TDLU

terminal ductal lobular unit

Footnotes

Ethics approval and consent to participate: The project was approved by the CHCAMS Ethics Committee and informed consent was not required for the use of existing pathological materials with no reveal of identifiable patient information. The study was also exempted from review by the Office of Human Subject Research Protections at the National Institutes of Health since NIH investigators do not have the access to the personal identifying information (Exempt Number: 11751).

Conflicts of interests: All authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer. The New England journal of medicine 2007;356: 227–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010;102: 1224–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ghosh K, Hartmann LC, Reynolds C, Visscher DW, Brandt KR, Vierkant RA, Scott CG, Radisky DC, Sellers TA, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM. Association Between Mammographic Density and Age-Related Lobular Involution of the Breast. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010;28: 2207–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gierach GL, Patel DA, Pfeiffer RM, Figueroa JD, Linville L, Papathomas D, Johnson JM, Chicoine RE, Herschorn SD, Shepherd JA, Wang J, Malkov S, et al. Relationship of Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution of the Breast with Area and Volume Mammographic Densities. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2016;9: 149–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghosh K, Vierkant RA, Frank RD, Winham S, Visscher DW, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, Brandt K, Sherman ME, Radisky DC, Frost MH, Hartmann LC, et al. Association between mammographic breast density and histologic features of benign breast disease. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19: 134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maskarinec G, Ju D, Horio D, Loo LW, Hernandez BY. Involution of breast tissue and mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2016;18: 128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Henson DE, Tarone RE. Involution and the etiology of breast cancer. Cancer 1994;74: 424–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Milanese TR, Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Degnim AC, Vachon CM, Reynolds CA, Thompson RA, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Age-related lobular involution and risk of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006;98: 1600–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ghosh K, Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Vierkant RA, Anderson SS, Brandt KR, Visscher DW, Reynolds C, Frost MH, Hartmann LC. Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010;102: 1716–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Figueroa JD, Pfeiffer RM, Brinton LA, Palakal MM, Degnim AC, Radisky D, Hartmann LC, Frost MH, Mann MLS, Papathomas D, Gierach GL, Hewitt SM, et al. Standardized measures of lobular involution and subsequent breast cancer risk among women with benign breast disease: a nested case-control study. Breast cancer research and treatment 2016;159: 163–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gierach GL, Brinton LA, Sherman ME. Lobular involution, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk: visualizing the future? Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010;102: 1685–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, St Louis J, Finkelstein DM, Yu KD, Chen WQ, Shao ZM, Goss PE. Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol 2014;15: e279–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dai H, Yan Y, Wang P, Liu P, Cao Y, Xiong L, Luo Y, Pan T, Ma X, Wang J, Yang Z, Liu X, et al. Distribution of mammographic density and its influential factors among Chinese women. International journal of epidemiology 2014;43: 1240–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guo C, Sung H, Zheng S, Guida J, Li E, Li J, Hu N, Deng J, Figueroa JD, Sherman ME, Gierach GL, Lu N, et al. Age-related terminal duct lobular unit involution in benign tissues from Chinese breast cancer patients with luminal and triple-negative tumors. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19: 61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Figueroa JD, Pfeiffer RM, Patel DA, Linville L, Brinton LA, Gierach GL, Yang XHR, Papathomas D, Visscher D, Mies C, Degnim AC, Anderson WF, et al. Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution of the Normal Breast: Implications for Breast Cancer Etiology. Jnci-J Natl Cancer I 2014;106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, Brinton LA, Farhat GN, Vacek PM, Weaver DL, Schairer C, Taplin SH, Sherman ME. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2012;104: 1218–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN. A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2006;15: 732–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Park IH, Ko K, Joo J, Park B, Jung SY, Lee S, Kwon Y, Kang HS, Lee ES, Lee KS, Ro J. High volumetric breast density predicts risk for breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, Korean Women. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21: 4124–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, Bernstein L, Salane M, Parisky YR, Astrahan M, Siozon CC, Pike MC. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2003;12: 332–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maskarinec G, Nagata C, Shimizu H, Kashiki Y. Comparison of mammographic densities and their determinants in women from Japan and Hawaii. Int J Cancer 2002;102: 29–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Chen Z, Nagata C, Gram IT. Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence. Breast cancer research and treatment 2007;104: 47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen Z, Wu AH, Gauderman WJ, Bernstein L, Ma H, Pike MC, Ursin G. Does Mammographic Density Reflect Ethnic Differences in Breast Cancer Incidence Rates? Am J Epidemiol 2004;159: 140–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mariapun S, Li J, Yip CH, Taib NA, Teo SH. Ethnic differences in mammographic densities: an Asian cross-sectional study. Plos One 2015;10: e0117568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.del Carmen MG, Halpern EF, Kopans DB, Moy B, Moore RH, Goss PE, Hughes KS. Mammographic breast density and race. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2007;188: 1147–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rajaram N, Mariapun S, Eriksson M, Tapia J, Kwan PY, Ho WK, Harun F, Rahmat K, Czene K, Taib NA, Hall P, Teo SH. Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis. Breast cancer research and treatment 2017;161: 353–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Figueroa JD, Pfeiffer RM, Patel DA, Linville L, Brinton LA, Gierach GL, Yang XR, Papathomas D, Visscher D, Mies C, Degnim AC, Anderson WF, et al. Terminal duct lobular unit involution of the normal breast: implications for breast cancer etiology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2014;106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, Bassetti E, Brancato B, Carozzi F, Catarzi S, Lamberini MP, Marcelli G, Pellizzoni R, Pesce B, Risso G, et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 2005;14: 269–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jin F, Tao M, Teng Y, Shao H, Li C, Mills E. Knowledge and attitude towards menopause and hormone replacement therapy in Chinese women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015;79: 40–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Figures

Supplementary Figure 1. Estimated TDLU counts per 100 mm2 by age based on LOWESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing) stratified by by BI-RADS density and tumor subtype: BI-RADS a-b; luminal A (n=19); BI-RADS c-d, luminal A (n=76); BI-RADS a-b, triple-negative (n=12); BI-RADS c-d, triple-negative (n=37)

Supplementary Figure 2. Distribution of median span (µm) of 10 TDLUs by BI-RADS density in all cases and by age group

Supp Tables

RESOURCES