Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2001 Feb;125(2):847–855. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.2.847

Identification and Analysis of a Gene from Calendula officinalis Encoding a Fatty Acid Conjugase

Xiao Qiu 1,1,*, Darwin W Reed 1, Haiping Hong 1,1, Samuel L MacKenzie 1, Patrick S Covello 1
PMCID: PMC64886  PMID: 11161042

Abstract

Two homologous cDNAs, CoFad2 and CoFac2, were isolated from a Calendula officinalis developing seed by a polymerase chain reaction-based cloning strategy. Both sequences share similarity to FAD2 desaturases and FAD2-related enzymes. In C. officinalis plants CoFad2 was expressed in all tissues tested, whereas CoFac2 expression was specific to developing seeds. Expression of CoFad2 cDNA in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) indicated it encodes a Δ12 desaturase that introduces a double bond at the 12 position of 16:1(9Z) and 18:1(9Z). Expression of CoFac2 in yeast revealed that the encoded enzyme acts as a fatty acid conjugase converting 18:2(9Z, 12Z) to calendic acid 18:3(8E, 10E, 12Z). The enzyme also has weak activity on the mono-unsaturates 16:1(9Z) and 18:1(9Z) producing compounds with the properties of 8,10 conjugated dienes.


Hundreds of different fatty acids, many of which have potential for industrial and pharmaceutical use, have been identified in nature (Smith, 1970). However, these fatty acids are mostly produced in the wild plant species or microorganisms that are not readily cultivated and cultured commercially. Conventional oilseed crops have high yields and oil contents, but they produce a limited set of fatty acids, which usually contain less than three double bonds in their acyl chains.

Generally speaking, in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), double bonds tend to be methylene-interrupted and in the cis configuration. However, fatty acids containing conjugated double bonds with various stereochemical configurations do occur in bacteria, algae, and plants. In the marine algae Bossiella orbigniana and Ptilota filicina, a substantial proportion of the PUFA contain conjugated double bonds (Burgess et al., 1991; Wise et al., 1994). In plants, various conjugated linolenic acid isomers accumulate in seeds. Examples includes α-eleostearic acid [18:3(9Z, 11E, 13E)] in Momordica charantia (Liu et al., 1997), punicic acid [18:3(9Z, 11E, 13Z)] in Punica granatum and Cayaponia africana, and jarcaric acid [18:3(8Z, 10E, 12Z)] in Jacaranda mimosifolia (Chisholm and Hopkins, 1967b; Hopkins and Chisholm, 1968). Calendula officinalis is an annual flowering plant that can accumulate more than 40% of calendic acid [18:3(8E, 10E, 12Z)] of the seed lipid fatty acids (Chisholm and Hopkins, 1967a). Although oils containing conjugated linolenic acids have potential value as drying oils, only α-eleostearic acid-containing oil from tung (Aleurites fordii) seeds is currently of commercial significance.

As compared with conjugated polyunsaturated acids, conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) appear less commonly in nature. A few reports have documented the occurrence of this fatty acid in the foods derived from ruminant animals (Fritsche and Fritsche, 1998) and a number of anaerobic bacteria such as rumen bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens (Kepler et al., 1966; Kepler and Tove, 1967). It is believed that CLAs are originally generated by rumen bacteria and then absorbed by the animal host (Pariza, 1997).

The diversity of fatty acids in nature is largely due to various combinations of the numbers and locations of double and triple bonds and other functional groups (hydroxyl and epoxy). These are produced by a family of structurally related enzymes (with three conservative His-rich motifs), including desaturases and their diverged forms such as hydroxylases, epoxygenases, acetylenases, and the so-called fatty acid conjugases (Lee et al., 1998; Shanklin and Cahoon, 1998; Cahoon et al., 1999). For microsomal enzymes in this category it is believed that they use fatty acids esterified to complex lipid as the substrate and accept electrons from an electron transport chain consisting of NAD(P)H, cytochrome b5 reductase, and cytochrome b5.

Based on the information that microsomal desaturases and related enzymes have similar primary structure, we undertook a PCR approach to clone genes that are involved in the biosynthesis of conjugated fatty acids in C. officinalis. Two unique cDNAs (CoFad2 and CoFac2) were identified. Expression of the two cDNAs in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) revealed that CoFAD2 is a Δ12 desaturase and CoFAC2 is a fatty acid conjugase that could convert the Δ9 double bond of linoleic acid and, to a lesser extent, of palmitoleic and oleic acids, into two conjugated double bonds at Δ8 and Δ10 position. To our knowledge this is the first example of identification of an enzyme that can produce CLAs.

RESULTS

C. officinalis is an annual flowering plant that has recently drawn scientific attention due to health claims of the essential oil in the flowers and the industrial potential of calendic acid in the seed oil. Calendic is the major fatty acid in the seeds, accounting for more than 40% of the total fatty acids. We are interested in the molecular basis for the biosynthesis of this special fatty acid.

Identification of a cDNA Coding for a Putative Fatty Acid Conjugase

To identify genes encoding conjugated double bond-forming enzymes in C. officinalis, a PCR-based cloning strategy was adopted. Sequencing of PCR products revealed three types of inserts related to desaturases. One had high sequence similarity to ω-3 desaturases (FAD3). The other two shared amino acid sequence similarity to various Δ12 desaturases (FAD2) and related enzymes, such as an acetylenase from Crepis alpina (Lee et al., 1998).

To isolate full-length cDNA clones the two types of Fad2-like inserts were used as probes to screen a cDNA library from developing seeds, which resulted in identification of several cDNA clones in each group. Sequencing identified two unique full-length of cDNAs, CoFad2 and CoFac2. CoFad2 is 1,411 bp and codes for 383 amino acids with an Mr of 44,000. CoFac2 is 1,301 bp in length and codes for 374 amino acids with a molecular mass of 43.6 kD. Sequence comparison revealed 46% amino acid identity between the two deduced proteins. The identity occurs all along the polypeptides with the highest among three conservative His-rich areas (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of CoFad2 and CoFac2 protein sequences of C. officinalis. Vertical bars indicate identical amino acids.

Sequence comparisons indicate that CoFAD2 shares 73% to 89% amino acid identity with the Δ12 desaturases from various plants (Okuley et al., 1994; Lee et al., 1998; GenBank accession nos. AF188264 and AAC 31698). Whereas CoFAC2 shares approximately equal sequence identity (50%) both to FAD2 desaturases and to other FAD2-like fatty acid-modifying enzymes including FAD2 from C. officinalis (CoFAD2, this paper), Indian mustard (GenBank accession Q39287 ), and borage (GenBank accession no. AAC31698), the Δ12 acetylenase of C. alpina (Lee et al., 1998), the bifunctional enzyme (oleate 12-hydroxylase:12-desaturase) of Lesquerella fendleri (Broun et al., 1998), the 12,13-epoxygenase of Crepis palaestina (Lee et al., 1998), and fatty acid conjugases from C. officinalis (Fritsche et al., 1999), Impatiens balsamina, and Momordica charantia (Cahoon et al., 1999).

Phylogenetic analysis indicates that CoFAC2 distinguishes itself as one of the most deeply branching within the plant FAD2-like sequences (Fig. 2). Bootstrap analysis does indicate that this branching pattern is not particularly reliable and it is possible that CoFAC2 could cluster with other fatty acid conjugases, an epoxygenase, and an acetylenase. On the other hand, CoFAD2 is clearly grouped within a main branch of FAD2-like enzymes, which includes the FAD2s per se, as well as the L. fendleri bifunctional enzyme (Broun et al., 1998) and Ricinus communis hydroxylase (van de Loo et al., 1995). These results suggest the possible functions of CoFAD2 and CoFAC2 as those of the extraplastidial Δ12 fatty acid desaturase and a fatty acid modifier likely to be involved in calendic acid biosynthesis, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis of FAD2-like enzymes. The dendrogram represents the result of a neighbor-joining analysis of amino acid sequence distances with bootstrap values in percent shown at nodes. The tree was arbitrarily rooted with Synechococcus desb sequence. Sequences used for the analysis were obtained from accession numbers: AAB61352.1, Sydesb, ω-3 desaturase of Synechococcus PCC7002; CAB64256.1, CoFac1, (8, 11)-linoleoyl desaturase from C. officinalis; P46313, AtFad2, Arabidopsis Δ12 desaturase; CAA76158.1, CaFad2, Δ12 fatty acid acetylenase from C. alpina; AAF05915.1, IbFac, Δ12 oleic acid desaturase-like protein from I. balsamina; CAA76157.1, CpFad2, Δ12 fatty acid desaturase from Crepis palaestina; AAC32755.1, LfFdh, bifunctional oleate 12-hydroxylase:desaturase from L. fendleri; T14269, HaFad2, Δ12 oleate desaturase from common sunflower; T09839, RcFah, oleate 12-hydroxylase from castor bean; CAA76156.1, CpEpo, Δ12 fatty acid epoxygenase from C. palaestina; AAF05916.1, McFac, Δ12 oleic acid desaturase-like protein from Momordica charantia; and AAF08684.1, MaFad2, Δ12 fatty acid desaturase from Mortierella alpina.

Northern-Blot Analysis of CoFac2 and CoFad2

Northern-blot analysis indicated that the CoFac2 was exclusively expressed in the developing seeds of C. officinalis (Fig. 3). It was not expressed in vegetative tissues such as leaves and in reproductive tissues such as flower buds. In contrast, CoFad2 was expressed in all tissues tested such as leaves, flower buds, and developing seeds, but preferentially in flower buds and developing seeds. Expression patterns of the two genes were consistent with the pattern of calendic acid accumulation, which occurs only in seeds. In C. officinalis calendic acid accumulated only in seeds, whereas linoleic acid, the product of the Δ12 desaturase (CoFAD2), was present in all three tissues examined, but the flower buds and developing seeds contain a higher amount of this fatty acid.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Northern-blot analysis of CoFad2 and CoFac2. A, Autoradiogram of northern blot hybridized with CoFad2 and CoFac2 probes. B, Ethidium bromide gel indicating RNA loading. F, Flower buds; L, leaves; S, developing seeds (see “Materials and Methods”).

Expression of CoFac2 and CoFad2 in Yeast

To investigate the function of CoFac2 the full-length cDNA was expressed in the yeast strain AMY-2α in which the stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase gene, ole1, is disrupted. The strain is unable to grow in minimal media without supplementation of mono-unsaturated fatty acids and allows for experimental control of the fatty composition of the yeast. In our experiments the strain was grown in minimal medium supplemented with 17:1(10Z), a non-substrate of CoFAC2, which enabled us to study the substrate specificity of the enzyme toward various substrates, especially mono-unsaturates. A number of possible substrates including 16:0, 16:1(9Z), 17:1(10Z), 18:0, 18:1(9Z), 18:1(9E), 18:1(11Z), 18:1(11E), 18:1(12Z), 18:1(15Z), 18:2(9Z, 12Z), 18:3(9Z, 12Z, 15Z), 20:0, 20:2(11Z, 14Z), and 22:1(13Z) were tested. As indicated in Figures 4 and 5 and Table I, only 18:2(9Z, 12Z) and, to a lesser extent, 16:1(9Z) and 18:1(9Z) were converted to conjugated fatty acids by the enzyme. For cultures supplemented separately with the three substrates, when gas chromatograms of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) derived from strains expressing CoFac2 were compared with those for vector controls, extra peaks were detected as shown in Figure 4. These peaks were selectively ablated when a Diels-Alder reaction with 4-methyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (MTAD) was performed prior to gas chromatography (GC) analysis (data not shown). The sets of m/z peaks indicated in Figure 5 are highly diagnostic for the original double bond positions of the conjugated fatty acid analyte. Mass spectral (MS) analysis of the MTAD derivatives indicates that the products of 16:1, 18:1, and 18:2 conversion are 16:2(8, 10) and 18:2(8, 10) (Fig. 5) and 18:3(8, 10, 12) (data not shown). Assignment of the product of 18:1(9) conversion is also supported by the agreement of its GC peak retention time with one of a mixture of standard CLA isomers (data not shown). The mass spectrum for the analyte identified as 18:3(8, 10, 12) is consistent with two compounds for which the Diels-Alder reaction has occurred at the 8 and 10 positions or the 10 and 12 positions of an 18:3 isomer. This compound has the same GC retention time as the major FAME derived from C. officinalis seeds and is in all likelihood 18:3(8E, 10E, 12Z). In control experiments with the AMY2α/pYES2 strain no peaks corresponding to conjugated fatty acids were detected (Fig. 4 and GC/MS, data not shown). The peaks in Figure 4 marked with asterisks were also ablated by reaction with MTAD. Their retention times and GC/MS analysis of the FAMES suggests that they are (conjugated) isomers of the major conjugated products. The amounts of conjugated fatty acids that accumulate in yeast cultures are shown in Table I. Qualitatively similar results were obtained in experiments with the unsupplemented and fatty acid-supplemented INVSc2/pCoFac2 strain (data not shown). Within the limitations of these in vivo experiments it would appear that the conjugase has a much higher activity on 18:2 than on the monoenes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GC analysis of FAMEs from yeast strain AMY-2α transformed with pCoFac2 (a) or control plasmid pYES2 (b) supplemented with 17:1(10) and separately with 16:1(9), (1), 18:1(9), (2), or 18:2(9, 12), (3) (see “Materials and Methods”). Δ indicates 18:1 and 20:1 impurities in the 16:1 and 18:1 substrates, respectively. An asterisk indicates peaks corresponding to isomers of the major conjugated products (see “Results”).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

GCMS EI spectra of the MTAD derivatives of novel fatty acids in AMY-2α/pCoFac2 cultures supplemented with 16:1(9Z), (A) and 18:1(9Z), (B). The structures assigned to the derivatives are shown with asterisks indicating the original position of the double bonds in the fatty acid. The pairs of peaks with m/z values 236 and 308 in A and 264 and 308 in B are diagnostic for the loss of R1 and R2 fragments, respectively, for 16:2(8, 10) and 18:2(8, 10) derivatives.

Table I.

Conversion of exogenous fatty acids by the yeast strain AMY-2α/pCoFac2

Substrate Supplied Substrate Accumulation Product Product Accumulation
% total fatty acids % total fatty acids
16:1(9) 45 (12) 16:2 (8, 10) 0.29 (0.04)
18:1(9) 42 (10) 18:2 (8, 10) 0.09 (0.02)
18:2(9, 12) 18 (3) 18:3 (8E, 10E, 12Z) 0.56 (0.3)

See “Materials and Methods” for culture conditions. Values are the means and sds (in parentheses) of three experiments. For control experiments using the AMY-2α/pYES2 strain, no significant peaks were detected at the retention time of the desaturation product.

As for the function of CoFad2, the expression of it in the wild-type yeast strain INVSc2 indicated that the encoded enzyme is a Δ12 desaturase that introduces a double bond at position 12 of 1:1(9Z) and 18:1(9Z) (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

In this report we described the identification and characterization of two homologous cDNAs, CoFac2 and CoFad2, from C. officinalis. Both products have sequence similarity to the FAD2 desaturases and related enzymes from plants. CoFAD2 has higher amino acid identity to the FAD2 desaturases (approximately 80%), whereas CoFAC2 has approximately equal sequence identity (approximately 50%) to both FAD2 desaturases and FAD2-related enzymes, including the Δ12 acetylenase of C. alpina (Lee et al., 1998), a bifunctional enzyme (oleate 12-hydroxylase:12-desaturase) of L. fendleri (Broun et al., 1998), an epoxygenases from C. palaestina (Lee et al., 1998), fatty acid conjugases from C. officinalis (Fritsche et al., 1999), I. balsamina, and M. charantia (Cahoon et al., 1999). Expression of CoFad2 cDNA in yeast indicated it encodes a Δ12 desaturase, whereas expression of CoFac2 in yeast revealed that the encoded enzyme produced conjugated linoleic and linolenic acids from 18:1(9Z) and 18:2(9Z, 12Z) substrates, respectively.

The name “conjugase” was previously coined to refer to enzymes that are responsible for introducing conjugated double bonds into acyl chains. Two conjugases from I. balsamina and M. charantia were found to be able to convert the Δ12 double bond of linoleic acid into two conjugated double bonds at the 11 and 13 positions, resulting in the production of conjugated linolenic acid [18:3(9Z, 11E, 13E)]. Expression of CoFac2 in yeast showed that this “conjugase” could convert Δ9 double bonds of 16:1(9Z), 18:1(9Z), and 18:2(9Z, 12Z) into two conjugated double bonds at the 8 and 10 positions to produce their corresponding conjugated fatty acids.

Two major routes to the biosynthesis of conjugated fatty acids have been elucidated. Isomerization of a common fatty acid into its conjugated counterpart without the introduction of additional double bonds was first described during biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by anaerobic rumen bacteria (Polan et al., 1964). In marine algae a recently identified enzyme can isomerize several PUFA into their corresponding conjugated polyenoic acids (Wise et al., 1994, 1997). The process is strictly an isomerization; there is no oxidized intermediate or net desaturation involved.

In plants the mechanism underlying biosynthesis of conjugated linolenic acids was studied by radiolabeling (Crombie and Holloway, 1985; Liu et al., 1997). Kinetics of the time course of metabolism of the radiolabeled precursors indicated linoleic acid esterified to phosphatidylcholine is an intermediate precursor of conjugated linolenic acid, implying that there is desaturation involved. Substrate specificity studies of CoFAD2, along with that of conjugases from I. balsamina and M. charantia (Cahoon et al., 1999), favor the hypothesis that conjugated fatty acids in plants are produced by a process similar to desaturation, which can result in introduction of one additional double bond in the existing fatty acid substrate. Crombie and Holloway (1985) previously observed that during conversion of linoleic acid to calendic acid in C. officinalis developing seeds, there is no loss of labeled hydrogens at C-9, C-10, C-12, and C-13, but there is a loss of a hydrogen from C-8 and C-11. Thus, Fritsche et al. (1999) speculated that the C. officinalis fatty acid conjugase could abstract hydrogens at carbon 8 and 11 positions, resulting in two conjugated double bonds in the 8 and 10. Two genes have now been cloned from C. officinalis whose products appear to catalyze the production of calendic acid. However, it is still not clear whether both cloned enzymes actually act via an “8,11 desaturation” mechanism.

It was unexpected that 18:1 (9) acts as a substrate, albeit a weak one, for CoFAC2 giving rise to conjugated linoleic acid [18:2(8, 10)] in yeast. CLA is a newly recognized nutraceutical compound that has recently drawn the attention of the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries because of its various physiological effects in animals and humans (Haumann, 1996; Ip, 1997; Pariza, 1997). Dietary CLA (two major isomers: 9Z, 11E and 10E, 12Z) was shown to reduce the development of atherosclerosis in rabbits (Lee et al., 1994) and to inhibit development of various cancers in model animals (Pariza et al., 1999). Feeding CLAs at low concentration (0.5% of diet) to rodents can enhance immune function (Miller et al., 1994). In addition, CLAs were recently found to decrease fat composition and increase lean body masses and to improve feed efficiency in chickens and pigs (Park et al., 1997). With the realization of the benefits of CLAs, market demand for the product is growing. There is, unfortunately, no rich natural source for CLAs. Although some animal foods such as dairy products and meat derived from ruminants contain CLAs, the proportion is low. Linoleic acid can be converted to CLA by chemical methods (Berdeaux et al., 1998; Chen et al., 1999). However, CLA derived from the chemical process is a mixture of several isomers. The two major isomers (9Z, 11E and 10E, 12Z) in about equal proportions account for about 80% of the product. The rest are other CLA isomers.

CLA produced by CoFAC2 in yeast is an unusual isomer with two conjugated double bonds at the 8 and 10 positions. The stereochemistry of the product remains to be determined. It is likely that it is 8E and 10E, since calendic acid [18:3(8E, 10E, 12Z)] is also a product of the enzyme in yeast.

The finding that CoFAC2 can use oleic substrate to synthesize the CLA has opened up a question regarding the potential uses: does this CLA isomer have any physiological effects on human and animal as common CLA does? To answer the question, preparation of large amounts of the isomer is the first essential step since feeding experiments and clinical trials would consume a large amount of the fatty acid. If the efficiency of conversion of 18:1 to CLA could be improved, it may be possible to produce the 8,10 isomer commercially in genetically modified organisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Materials

Calendula officinalis was grown in a growth chamber at 22°C with a 16-h photoperiod at a photon flux density of 150 to 200 μE m−2 s−1. The developing seeds at 15 to 30 d after flowering were collected. The embryos were dissected from seeds and used for RNA isolation.

Construction and Screening of cDNA Library

The total RNA was isolated from developing embryos according to Qiu and Erickson (1994). The cDNA library was constructed from the total RNA. The first strand cDNA was synthesized by superscript II reverse transcriptase from Gibco-BRL (Gaithersburg, MD). The second strand cDNA was synthesized by DNA polymerase I from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). After size fractionation, cDNA inserts larger than 1 kb were ligated into λ Uni-Zap XR vector (Stratagene). The recombinant λ DNAs were then packaged with Gigapack III Gold packaging extract (Stratagene) and plated on NZ amine-yeast extract plates. The resulting library represented more than 8 × 106 independent clones. Screening of the cDNA library was performed according to standard methods (Sambrook et al., 1989).

Reverse Transcriptase-PCR

For reverse-transcriptase experiments the single strand cDNA was synthesized by superscript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL) from total RNA and was then used as the template for PCR reaction. Two degenerate primers (the forward primer: GCXCAC/TGAC/A/GTGC/TGGXCAC/ TC/GA and the reverse primer: CATXGTXG/CA/TG/AAAXAG/AG/ATGG/ATG) were designed to target the conserved His-rich domains of desaturases. The PCR amplification consisted of 35 cycles with 1 min at 94°C, 1.5 min at 55°C, and 2 min at 72°C followed by an extension step at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified products from 400 to 600 bp were isolated from agarose gel and purified by a kit (Qiaex II gel purification, Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and subsequently cloned into the TA cloning vector pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The cloned inserts were then sequenced by PRISM DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing System (Perkin Elmer/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Phylogenetic Analysis

For phylogenetic analysis, predicted amino acid sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW (version 1.60; Thompson et al., 1998) with the default parameters, including gap open and extension penalties of 10 and 0.05, respectively, for pairwise and multiple alignments. The BLOSUM 30 protein weight matrix was used for pairwise alignments and the BLOSUM series for multiple alignments. CLUSTALW was used to determine dendrograms representing a neighbor-joining analysis of sequence distances. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 iterations and visualized with the TreeView program (Page, 1996).

Northern-Blot Analysis

For northern-blot analysis, 7 μg of total RNAs isolated from flower buds, leaves, and developing seeds of C. officinalis as described above were fractionated in a formaldehyde-agarose gel. After electrophoresis RNAs were transferred to Hybond membrane (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala) using 10× SSC transferring solution and were then fixed to the membrane by UV crosslinking. Filter-bound RNAs were then hybridized with the radiolabeled cDNA probes at 68°C for 1 h in Quickhyb (Stratagene). After hybridization the blots were washed once at room temperature for one-half an hour with a solution of 2× SSC and 1% (w/v) SDS, and once at 65°C for one-half an hour with a solution of 0.1× SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS.

Expression of CoFad2 and CoFac2 in Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)

The open reading frames of CoFad2 and CoFac2 were amplified by PCR using the Precision Plus enzyme (Stratagene) and cloned into a TA cloning vector (pCR 2.1, Invitrogen). Having confirmed that the PCR products were identical to the original cDNAs by sequencing, the fragments were then released by a BamHI-EcoRI double digestion and inserted into the yeast expression vector pYES2 (Invitrogen) under the control of the inducible promoter GAL1.

Yeast strains InvSc2 (Invitrogen) and AMY-2α [the genotype: MATα, CYTb5, ole1(ΔBstEII)::LEU2, trp1-1, can1-100, ura3-1, ade2-1, HIS3; Mitchell and Martin, 1995] were transformed with the expression constructs using the lithium acetate method and transformants were selected on minimal medium plates lacking uracil (Gietz et al., 1992; Covello and Reed, 1996).

Transformants were first grown in minimal medium lacking uracil and containing Glc (CM-ura, Ausubel et al., 1995) at 28°C. After overnight culture the cells were spun down, washed, and resuspended in distilled water. Minimal medium with 2% (w/v) Gal replacing Glc, and with or without 0.3 mm substrate fatty acids in the presence of 0.1% (w/v) Tergitol was inoculated with the yeast transformant cell suspension and incubated at 20°C for 3 d followed by 15°C for 3 d. For the AMY2α strain media were supplemented with 0.3 mm 17:1(10Z) and 0.1% (w/v) Tergitol.

Fatty Acid Analysis

Yeast cultures were pelleted by centrifugation (4,000g, 10 min.) and pellets were washed with 10 mL of 1% (w/v) Tergitol solution and 2 × 10 mL of water. The yeast pellet was dried under vacuum at ambient temperature. To the dried pellet in a glass culture tube was added 1 mL of methanol and the pellet was dispersed using a high speed homogenizer. To this mixture was added 2 mL of 0.5 m sodium methoxide in methanol. The tube was flushed with nitrogen, sealed, and heated to 50°C for 1 h. The cooled mixture was extracted with 2 × 2 mL of hexane. The pooled hexane was washed with 2 mL of water and was concentrated under N2 for GC or GC/MS analysis.

FAME analysis was carried out using a gas chromatograph (6890, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a DB-23 fused silica column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25-μm film thickness; J&W Scientific, Fulsom, CA) with a temperature program of 180°C for 1 min, 4°C/min to 240°C, hold for 15 min.

For conjugated polyene analysis, FAME were derivatized with MTAD (Dobson, 1998). One hundred microliters of a dilute solution of MTAD (<1 mg/mL, slight pink color) in CHCl3 at 0°C was added to dry FAME from yeast cells with agitation for 5 to 10 s. A dilute solution of 1,3-hexadiene (excess) was then added to neutralize reactants (removal of color). The tube was dried under nitrogen and the residue was re-dissolved in CHCl3.

GC/MS analysis was performed in standard EI mode using a Fisons VG TRIO 2000 mass spectrometer (VG Analytical, Manchester, UK) controlled by Masslynx version 2.0 software, coupled to a GC 8000 Series gas chromatograph. For FAME analysis, a DB-23 column was used with the temperature program described above. For MTAD derivative analysis, a DB-5 column (60 m × 0.32 mm i.d., 0.25-μm film thickness, J&W Scientific) that was temperature-programmed at 50°C for 1 min, increased at 20°C/min to 160°C, then 5°C/min to 350°C and held for 15 min.

In some experiments, C. officinalis oil extracted from seeds or a mixture of CLAs (Sigma, St. Louis) was used as the standard.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank Dr. Ron Wilen for providing C. officinalis seeds, Dr. Charles Martin for providing yeast AMY-2α mutant strain, and Stephen Ambrose for GC/MS analysis.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K, Albright LM, Coen DM, Varki A. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berdeaux O, Voinot L, Angioni E, Juaneda P, Sebedio JL. A simple method of preparation of methyl trans-10, cis-12 and cis-9, trans-11-octadecadienoates from methyl linoleate. JAOCS. 1998;75(12):1749–1755. [Google Scholar]
  3. Broun P, Boddupalli S, Somerville C. A bifunctional oleate 12-hydroxylase: desaturase from Lesquerella fendleri. Plant J. 1998;13(2):201–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgess JR, de la Rosa RI, Jacobs RS, Butler A. A new eicosapentaenoic acid formed from arachidonic acid in the coralline red algae Bossiella orbigniana. Lipids. 1991;26:162–165. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cahoon EB, Carlson TJ, Ripp KG, Schweiger BJ, Cook GA, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Biosynthetic origin of conjugated double bonds: production of fatty acid components of high-value drying oils in transgenic soybean embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12935–12940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen CA, Lu W, Sih CJ. Synthesis of 9Z, 11E-octadecadienoic and 10E, 12Z-octadecadienoic acids, the major components of conjugated linoleic acid. Lipids. 1999;34(8):879–884. doi: 10.1007/s11745-999-0436-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chisholm MJ, Hopkins CY. Calendic acid in seed oils of the genus Calendula. Can J Biochem. 1967a;45:251–255. doi: 10.1139/o67-028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chisholm MJ, Hopkins CY. Conjugated fatty acids in some Cucurbitaceaeseed oils. Can J Biochem. 1967b;45:1081–1086. doi: 10.1139/o67-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Covello PS, Reed DW. Functional expression of the extraplastidial Arabidopsis thaliana oleate desaturase gene (FAD2) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:223–226. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.1.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Crombie L, Holloway JH. The biosynthesis of calendic acid, octadeca-(8E, 10E, 12E)-trienoic acid, by developing marigold seeds: origin of (E,E,Z) and (Z,E,Z) conjugated triene acids in higher plants. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1985;1:2425–2434. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dobson G. Identification of conjugated fatty acids by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of 4-methyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione adducts. JAOCS. 1998;75(2):137–142. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fritsche K, Hornung E, Peitzsch N, Renz A, Feussner I. Isolation and characterization of a calendic acid producing (8, 11)-linoleoyl desaturase. FEBS Lett. 1999;462:249–253. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01541-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fritsche S, Fritsche J. Occurrence of conjugated linoleic acid isomers in beef. JAOCS. 1998;75:1449–1451. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gietz D, St. Jean A, Woods RA, Schiestl RH. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haumann BF. Conjugated linoleic acid offers research promise. Inform. 1996;7:152–159. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopkins CY, Chisholm MJ. A survey of the conjugated fatty acids of seed oils. JAOCS. 1968;45:176–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02915346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ip C. Review of the effects of transfatty acids, oleic acid, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and conjugated linoleic acid on mammary carcinogenesis in animals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:S1523–S1529. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.6.1523S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kepler CR, Hirons KP, McNeill JJ, Tove SB. Intermediates and products of biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrivibrio fibrsolvens. J Biol Chem. 1966;241(6):1350–1354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kepler CR, Tove SB. Biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids, III purification and properties of a linoleate Δ12-cis, Δ11 trans-isomerase from Butyrivibrio fibrsolvens. J Biol Chem. 1967;212(24):5686–5692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee KN, Kritchevsky D, Pariza MW. Conjugated linoleic acids and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis. 1994;108:19–25. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(94)90034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee M, Lenman M, Banas A, Bafor M, Singh S, Schweizer M, Nilsson R, Liljenberg C, Dahlqvist A, Gummeson P, Sjoedahl S, Green A, Stymne S. Identification of non-heme diiron proteins that catalyze triple bond and epoxy group formation. Science. 1998;280(5365):915–918. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu L, Hammond EG, Nikolau BJ. In vivo studies of the biosynthesis of α-eleostearic acid in the seed of Momordica charantiaL. Plant Physiol. 1997;113:1343–1349. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.4.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller CC, Park Y, Pariza MW, Cook ME. Feeding conjugated linoleic acid to animals partially overcomescatabolic responses due to endotoxin injection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;198:1107–1112. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchell AG, Martin CE. A novel cytochrome b5-like domain is linked to the carboxyl terminus of the Saccharomyces cerevisiaeΔ-9 fatty acid. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:29766–29772. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.50.29766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Okuley J, Lightner J, Feldman KA, Yadav NS, Lark E, Browse J. ArabidopsisFAD2 gene encodes the enzyme that is essential for polyunsaturated lipid synthesis. Plant Cell. 1994;6:147–158. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Page RDM. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Appl Biosci. 1996;12:357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Park Y, Albright KJ, Liu W, Storkson JM, Cook ME, Pariza MW. Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice. Lipids. 1997;32:853–858. doi: 10.1007/s11745-997-0109-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pariza MW. Conjugated linoleic acid, a newly recognized nutrient. Chem Industry. 1997;16:464–466. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pariza MW, Park Y, Cook ME. Conjugated linoleic acid and the control of cancer and obesity. Toxicol Sci. 1999;52:107–110. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/52.suppl_1.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Polan CE, McNeill JJ, Tove SB. Biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids by rumen bacteria. J Biol Chem. 1964;88(4):1056–1064. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.4.1056-1064.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Qiu X, Erickson L. A simple and effective method for isolating RNA from alfalfa pollen. Plant Mol Biol Reporter. 1994;12:209–214. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shanklin J, Cahoon EB. Desaturation and related modifications of fatty acids. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998;49:611–641. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith CR. Occurrence of unusual fatty acids in plants. In: Holman RT, editor. Progress in the Chemistry of Fats and Other Lipids. XI 1970. , part 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 137–177. [Google Scholar]
  35. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van de Loo FJ, Broun P, Turner S, Somerville C. An oleate 12-hydroxylase from Ricinus communisL. is a fatty acyl desaturase homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(15):6743–6747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wise ML, Hamberg M, Gerwick WH. Biosynthesis of conjugated triene-containing fatty acids by a novel isomerase from the red marine alga Ptilota filicina. Biochemistry. 1994;33:15223–15232. doi: 10.1021/bi00255a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wise ML, Hamberg M, Gerwick WH. Characterization of the substrate binding site of polyenoic fatty acids isomerase, a novel enzyme from the marine alga Ptilota filicina. Biochemistry. 1997;36:2985–2992. doi: 10.1021/bi962158v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES