Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Apr 11;24:103913. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103913

A comprehensive dataset on anaerobic digestion of cattle manure, source separated organics, and municipal sludge using different inoculum sources

E Hosseini Koupaie a, A Azizi a, AA Bazyar Lakeh a, H Hafez a,b, E Elbeshbishy a,
PMCID: PMC6488733  PMID: 31061859

Abstract

The dataset reported in this article provides quantitative data on anaerobic digestion of cattle manure, source separated organics (SSO), primary sludge (PS), and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using different inoculum sources. The discussion and interpretation of the data are provided in another publication entitled “Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes” [1]. The data presented in this article include 1) the gas chromatography (GC) procedure of determining the biogas composition, 2) the procedure of converting the daily biogas/methane production data from the experimental condition (mesophilic temperature of 38 °C and room pressure) to the standard temperature (0 °C) and pressure (1 atm) condition, 3) the specific methanogenic activity data, and 4) the methane daily production rate data, and 5) the organics biodegradation kinetic rates.


Specifications table

Subject area Environmental Engineering
More specific subject area Anaerobic digestion, organic solid waste treatment, biological treatment, bioenergy recovery
Type of data Table, figures
How data was acquired The biogas methane content was measured via gas chromatography (GC). The chemical oxygen demand (COD), carbohydrate, and protein contents of the samples were determined calorimetrically using a DR3900 Hach spectrophotometer. The volume of the biogas produced throughout the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test was measured manually. The production of biogas during the biohydrogen potential test was instantly monitored throughout 72 h. The Minitab Software 17 was used for the statistical analysis.
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors To analyze the soluble content, the sample was first centrifuged using a Fisher Scientific Sorvall Legend XT centrifuge at 90000 rpm for 30 min. Afterwards, the centrate (permeate) of the centrifuged samples was filtered through 0.45 μm microfiber filters.
Experimental features Three sets of experiment including SMA, BMP, and BHP were conducted. The acetic acid was used as a substrate for the SMA assay. The BMP test was performed with four different organic solid waste including cattle manure, SSO, PS, and TWAS. The substrate for the BHP experiment was glucose. All the experiments were done in triplicates.
Data source location Toronto, Canada
Data accessibility Data are presented in this article
Related research article [1] E. Hosseini Koupaie, A. Azizi, A.A. Bazyar Lakeh, H. Hafez, E. Elbeshbishy, Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes, Waste Manage., 87 (2019) 228–236.
Value of the Data
  • To understand the details on translating the parameters measured under specific laboratory conditions (temperature and pressure) into the standard condition which makes the data easily comparable with other researchers' findings.

  • The kinetic data would be useful to compare the digestion rate of various organic waste with respect to the type of inoculum used.

  • The data provides comprehensive information on the application of two different inoculum sources on anaerobic digestion of synthetic (acetic acid and glucose) and real organic waste

  • The dataset presents the procedure of the analytical method with GC to analyze the biogas composition as well as the detailed information on several measured AD parameters.

  • The dataset provided in this article suggests that the startup (seeding) of industrial-scale anaerobic digestion plants can be done using dewatered digestate cake, reducing the transportation volume up to 90% compared to the application of liquid digestate.

1. Data

The measured biogas production data during the SMA, BHP, and BHP experiments are presented in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3, respectively. The converted values to the standard temperature (°C) and pressure (1 atm) condition are shown in Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, respectively. Table 7 presents the daily methane production rate of the SMA digesters at the standard temperature and pressure condition. Fig. 1 illustrates the cumulative methane production of the SMA digesters during the initial operation period along with the linear regression equation of the best-fitted line to each graph. The slope of the linear regression was used to determine the specific methanogenic activity illustrated in Fig. 2. Fig. 3 shows the first-order specific TCOD removal rate constant of the BMP digesters.

Table 1.

Daily biogas production data from the SMA reactors at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Day F/M = 0.25
F/M = 0.5
AD digestate STDEV AD cake STDEV AD digestate STDEV AD cake STDEV
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 16 2 19 3 20 5 24 2
2 25 2 32 9 31 4 34 12
3 36 4 50 6 41 11 59 17
4 50 12 57 4 49 10 86 15
5 57 6 59 11 56 14 104 14
8 83 11 94 8 79 12 164 20
9 96 13 116 18 93 12 185 13
11 108 11 144 11 111 16 227 17
12 124 14 163 7 138 15 267 10
15 154 9 208 18 191 21 365 12
16 159 19 220 20 219 18 406 16
18 188 19 253 19 260 24 480 14
19 205 21 270 9 291 14 516 28
20 221 17 284 17 318 11 544 25
21 240 18 293 17 345 17 570 27
22 263 13 306 21 393 14 588 19
23 279 16 309 19 436 21 599 22
24 294 11 314 14 485 27 610 24
25 304 16 316 14 526 21 622 17
26 317 18 318 20 555 34 627 19
27 323 31 321 17 581 31 633 16
28 329 19 323 24 593 16 636 15
29 334 23 325 24 608 22 641 23
30 340 23 328 18 618 27 643 19
31 342 20 332 23 626 21 644 23
32 342 10 332 25 627 18 646 18
33 343 17 333 23 628 14 647 17
34 343 22 334 13 629 22 647 20
35 344 20 335 23 630 20 647 20

Table 2.

Daily biohydrogen production data from the BHP reactors at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Time (h) Digestate STDEV Digestate cake STDEV
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 2 1
2 1 1 2 1
3 1 1 2 1
4 1 1 3 1
5 1 1 4 1
6 2 1 6 2
7 3 0 6 2
8 4 1 8 4
9 6 3 10 5
10 9 9 10 4
11 13 11 11 2
12 18 10 14 3
13 26 8 19 2
14 36 20 27 2
15 50 28 37 5
16 70 27 50 4
16.5 81 24 56 8
17 93 21 62 4
17.5 104 29 69 11
18 118 25 78 7
18.5 132 23 96 16
19 148 22 122 20
19.5 163 23 149 23
20 179 17 179 14
20.5 197 21 209 19
21 216 23 235 22
21.5 236 27 254 16
22 258 23 271 32
22.5 283 29 288 25
23 306 21 305 22
23.5 316 23 319 37
24 332 29 331 33
24.5 346 27 338 43
25 354 19 345 53
25.5 362 25 350 24
26 367 27 354 41
26.5 370 23 357 50
27 372 25 359 34
27.5 375 27 360 34
28 378 25 362 43
28.5 380 31 363 38
29 381 29 364 34
30 382 25 366 43
31 382 31 367 43
32 382 27 368 34
33 382 31 368 34
34 382 29 368 26
35 382 25 368 34
36 382 25 368 26

Table 3.

Daily biogas production data from the BMP reactors at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).

Time (d)
0 2 4 5 7 8 10 11 13 14 17 19 22 25 28 31 35 42
TWAS Digestate Average 0 41 75 95 115 127 146 170 196 233 406 547 762 856 885 896 897 898
STDEV 0 6 15 9 16 10 14 23 17 22 38 45 39 34 34 38 40 42
Digestate cake Average 0 87 126 149 178 201 235 274 314 370 580 707 853 884 922 945 945 950
STDEV 0 4 6 9 5 17 14 18 24 35 48 39 26 58 60 71 71 73
PS Digestate Average 0 24 39 103 151 179 203 210 235 249 308 344 425 595 869 1015 1028 1046
STDEV 2 13 17 48 31 24 20 23 27 31 40 38 19 37 48 20 25 30
Digestate cake Average 0 51 75 123 201 232 264 308 335 374 557 681 858 980 1055 1084 1084 1084
STDEV 2 12 13 20 6 7 18 13 16 22 37 47 52 55 61 67 67 67
SSO Digestate Average 0 7 69 135 183 204 222 241 271 334 657 807 1020 1146 1234 1280 1300 1300
STDEV 60 8 15 18 19 21 16 11 16 17 51 66 49 62 52 57 54 54
Digestate cake Average 41 84 144 206 239 259 307 394 503 606 872 986 1128 1215 1265 1265 1265 1265
STDEV 1 7 15 20 21 24 33 45 52 56 79 78 96 111 109 109 109 109
Manure Digestate Average 0 12 40 77 137 182 243 307 370 434 589 640 720 785 833 854 856 863
STDEV 2 6 17 25 32 46 51 43 66 64 74 45 84 56 36 40 59 50
Digestate cake Average 0 32 87 166 288 382 488 551 605 643 722 750 786 804 815 827 831 835
STDEV 2 4 8 12 18 26 35 44 53 59 70 74 77 81 83 88 88 88

Table 4.

Converted daily biogas production data from the SMA reactors to the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).

Day F/M = 0.25
F/M = 0.5
AD digestate STDEV AD cake STDEV AD digestate STDEV AD cake STDEV
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 14 2 17 3 18 5 21 2
2 23 2 28 8 28 3 30 10
3 32 3 44 5 36 10 52 15
4 44 10 50 3 43 9 76 14
5 51 5 53 10 50 13 92 13
8 74 10 83 7 70 11 145 18
9 85 11 103 16 82 11 164 11
11 96 10 128 9 98 14 201 15
12 110 13 144 6 123 13 236 9
15 136 8 184 16 170 19 324 10
16 141 17 195 18 194 16 360 14
18 167 17 224 17 231 21 426 12
19 182 18 239 8 258 12 457 25
20 196 15 252 15 282 10 482 22
21 212 16 260 15 306 15 506 24
22 233 12 271 19 348 12 521 17
23 247 14 274 16 386 19 531 19
24 260 10 278 13 430 24 541 21
25 269 14 280 12 466 19 551 15
26 281 16 282 18 492 30 555 17
27 286 28 285 15 515 28 561 14
28 292 17 286 21 526 15 564 13
29 296 21 288 22 539 20 568 20
30 301 20 291 16 547 24 570 17
31 303 17 294 20 555 18 571 20
32 304 9 295 22 556 16 572 16
33 304 15 295 20 557 12 573 15
34 304 20 296 11 558 20 574 18
35 304 17 297 20 558 18 574 18

Table 5.

Converted daily biohydrogen production data from the BHP reactors to the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).

Time (h) Digestate STDEV Digestate cake STDEV
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 1
2 1 1 2 1
3 1 1 2 1
4 1 1 3 1
5 1 1 3 1
6 2 1 5 2
7 2 0 6 2
8 3 1 7 4
9 5 3 8 5
10 8 8 9 4
11 12 10 10 2
12 16 9 12 2
13 23 7 17 2
14 32 18 24 2
15 44 25 33 4
16 62 24 44 4
16.5 71 21 50 7
17 82 19 55 4
17.5 92 25 61 10
18 104 23 69 6
18.5 117 20 85 14
19 131 20 108 17
19.5 145 20 132 20
20 159 15 159 13
20.5 175 19 185 17
21 191 20 208 19
21.5 209 24 225 14
22 228 20 240 28
22.5 251 25 255 23
23 271 19 270 20
23.5 280 20 283 33
24 295 25 293 29
24.5 307 24 300 38
25 314 17 306 47
25.5 321 22 310 21
26 325 24 314 36
26.5 328 20 316 45
27 330 22 318 30
27.5 333 24 320 30
28 335 22 321 38
28.5 337 27 322 34
29 337 25 323 31
30 338 22 324 38
31 338 27 325 38
32 338 24 326 31
33 338 27 326 31
34 338 25 326 23
35 338 22 326 31
36 338 22 326 23

Table 6.

Converted daily biogas production data from the BMP reactors to the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).

Time (d)
0 2 4 5 7 8 10 11 13 14 17 19 22 25 28 31 35 42
TWAS Digestate Average 0 36 66 84 102 112 129 151 174 207 360 485 675 759 785 794 795 796
STDEV 0 5 13 8 14 9 12 20 15 19 33 40 35 30 30 34 35 38
Digestate cake Average 0 77 112 132 158 178 208 243 278 328 514 626 756 783 817 838 838 842
STDEV 0 4 5 8 4 15 12 16 21 31 42 35 23 51 53 63 63 64
PS Digestate Average 0 21 34 91 134 158 180 186 208 221 273 304 376 528 770 899 911 927
STDEV 1 12 15 43 28 21 18 21 24 28 36 33 17 33 43 18 22 27
Digestate cake Average 0 45 66 109 178 205 234 273 297 332 494 603 760 869 935 960 960 960
STDEV 1 11 12 18 5 6 16 12 15 19 33 42 46 48 54 59 59 59
SSO Digestate Average 0 6 61 120 162 180 196 214 240 296 582 715 904 1016 1094 1135 1152 1152
STDEV 53 7 13 16 17 19 14 10 14 15 45 58 43 55 47 51 47 47
Digestate cake Average 37 74 127 182 212 230 272 349 445 537 773 874 1000 1077 1121 1121 1121 1121
STDEV 1 6 13 18 19 21 30 40 46 50 70 69 85 99 96 96 96 96
Manure Digestate Average 0 10 36 69 121 161 216 272 328 385 522 567 638 696 739 757 759 765
STDEV 1 5 15 22 29 40 45 38 58 57 66 40 75 49 32 35 53 44
Digestate cake Average 0 29 77 147 255 338 433 488 536 570 640 665 697 712 723 733 736 740
STDEV 1 4 7 11 16 23 31 39 47 53 62 66 69 72 74 78 78 78

Table 7.

Daily methane production rate of the SMA digesters at the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL/g TCODadded.d).

Day F/M = 0.25
F/M = 0.5
AD digestate STDEV AD cake STDEV AD digestate STDEV AD cake STDEV
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 14.0 3.8 17.0 5.4 9.1 4.6 10.7 2.2
2 9.0 1.6 11.9 7.0 4.9 1.2 4.5 3.1
3 10.3 2.2 17.3 4.0 4.9 2.7 12.1 7.0
4 10.8 5.1 5.6 0.7 3.2 1.4 10.8 3.9
5 8.2 1.6 2.7 1.0 3.8 1.9 9.4 2.6
8 7.7 2.0 10.1 1.6 3.4 1.0 8.9 2.2
9 12.9 3.4 23.7a 7.2 7.4 1.9 11.2 1.6
11 5.6 1.2 12.9 1.9 4.0 1.2 9.6 1.4
12 11.0 2.5 12.9 1.1 9.8 2.1 14.0 1.0
15 9.2 1.1 13.7 2.3 8.1 1.8 15.1 1.0
16 5.6 1.3 12.7 2.3 14.0 2.3 20.4a 1.6
18 12.7 2.5 14.3 2.1 9.0 1.6 16.3 0.9
19 15.6 3.1 15.6 1.0 13.7 1.3 16.0 1.8
20 14.0 2.1 12.4 1.5 12.1 0.9 12.7 1.2
21 16.8 2.5 8.1 0.9 12.5 1.2 11.9 1.1
22 21.1a 2.1 11.8 1.6 21.3 1.5 7.8 0.5
23 14.1 1.6 3.1 0.4 19.5 1.9 5.1 0.4
24 13.8 1.0 3.9 0.4 22.4a 2.5 5.1 0.4
25 8.9 0.9 2.0 0.2 18.3 1.5 5.2 0.3
26 11.7 1.3 1.8 0.2 13.1 1.6 2.2 0.1
27 5.8 1.1 2.9 0.3 11.8 1.3 2.7 0.1
28 5.6 0.7 1.3 0.2 5.5 0.3 1.7 0.1
29 4.4 0.6 2.4 0.4 6.7 0.5 2.2 0.2
30 5.0 0.7 2.9 0.3 4.4 0.4 0.7 0.0
31 2.1 0.2 3.0 0.4 3.8 0.3 0.6 0.0
32 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0
33 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0
34 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0
35 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0
a

The maximum daily methane production rate values are highlighted in blue.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Cumulative methane production of the SMA digesters during the initial operation period.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The specific methanogenic activity of the SMA digesters (determined via the slope of the best-fitted line to the Fig. 1 graphs).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

First-order specific TCOD removal rate constant of the BMP digesters.

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

2.1. Data analysis procedures

The conversion of measured biogas volume data from the experimental conditions to the standard temperature and pressure condition was done using Eq. (1).

VSTP=Vm(TSTPTm)(PmPSTP) (1)

where.

VSTP: Biogas volume at the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).

Vm: Measured biogas volume (mL).

TSTP: Standard temperature (273.15°C).

Tm: Digester temperature (273.15 + 38 = 311.15°C).

Pm: Pressure at the time of measuring the biogas volume (atm).

PSTP: Standard pressure (1 atm).

The daily methane production rate was determined via Eq. (2)

Ri=Vi+1ViΔt,i0 (2)

Ri: Daily methane production rate (mL/g TCODadded.d).

Vi: Cumulative biogas production yield until ith measurement (mL/g TCODadded).

Vi+1: Cumulative biogas production until (i+1)th measurement (mL/g TCODadded).

Δt: Time difference between the ith and (i+1)th biogas measurement (d).

Previous studies have proven that the first-order reaction model can represent the biogas production as well as the organics removal during the AD process [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Eq. (3) shows the first-order reaction model that was utilized to calculate the specific reaction rate constant of the BMP digesters.

rsu=Ct=kC (3)

in which rsu, C and k are TCOD removal rate (mg/L.d), TCOD concentration (mg/L) and first-order specific rate constant (1/d), respectively. Eq. (4) is derived after integration and rearrangement of Eq. (3).

Lt=Luekt (4)

in which Lt, Lu and t are TCOD concentration in the digester at time t (mg/L), ultimate biodegradable TCOD (mg/L) and digestion time, respectively.

2.2. Analytical procedure

The methane content of the produced biogas was measured with a Thermo Scientific Trace 1310 gas chromatograph (GC). The GC had a TG-Bond Msieve 5A packed column with diameter and length of 0.53 mm and 30 m, respectively. It was also equipped with a thermal conductivity detector running at the oven, detector, and filament temperatures of 80, 100, and 250 °C, respectively. The chemical oxygen demand (COD), carbohydrate, and protein contents of the samples were determined calorimetrically using a DR3900 Hach spectrophotometer. The volume of the biogas produced throughout the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test was measured with a 100 mL air-tight glass syringe (Poulten & Graf Fortuna™). The production of biogas during the biohydrogen potential test was monitored using an AMPTS II gas-measuring device (Bioprocess Control, Lund, Sweden). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Minitab Software 17. The COD analysis was carried out using the closed reflux colorimetric method described by the Standard Methods [7]. The analyses of carbohydrate and protein were performed according to the colorimetric methods developed by Dubios et al. (1956) and Frolund et al. (1995), respectively [8], [9].

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Southern Ontario Water Consortium (SOWC) is much appreciated.

Footnotes

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103913.

Transparency document

The following is the transparency document related to this article:

Multimedia Component 1

mmc1.pdf (468.8KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Hosseini Koupaie E., Azizi A., Bazyar Lakeh A.A., Hafez H., Elbeshbishy E. Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. Waste Manage. 2019;87:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eskicioglu C., Kennedy K.J., Droste R.L. Characterization of soluble organic matter of waste activated sludge before and after thermal pretreatment. Water Res. 2006;40:3725–3736. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hosseini Koupaie E., Johnson T., Eskicioglu C. Comparison of different electricity-based thermal pretreatment methods for enhanced bioenergy production from municipal sludge. Molecules. 2018;23:1–15. doi: 10.3390/molecules23082006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coelho N.M.G., Droste R.L., Kennedy K.J. Evaluation of continuous mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of microwaved activated sludge. Water Res. 2011;45:2822–2834. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Razavi A., Koupaie E.H., Azizi A., Hafez H., Elbeshbishy E. Hydrothermal pretreatment of source separated organics for enhanced solubilization and biomethane recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;274:502–511. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hosseini Koupaie E. School of Engineering. University of British Columbia, BC; Canada: 2017. Radio frequency sludge hydrolysis as an energy efficient alternative to microwave and conductive heating for advanced anaerobic digestion. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.APHA . twentieth ed. American Public Health Association; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for the determination of sugar and related substances. Anal. Chem., Anal. Chem. 1956;28:350–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frolund B., Griebe T., Nielsen P.H. Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995;43:755–761. doi: 10.1007/BF00164784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia Component 1

mmc1.pdf (468.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES