Abstract
The dataset reported in this article provides quantitative data on anaerobic digestion of cattle manure, source separated organics (SSO), primary sludge (PS), and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) using different inoculum sources. The discussion and interpretation of the data are provided in another publication entitled “Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes” [1]. The data presented in this article include 1) the gas chromatography (GC) procedure of determining the biogas composition, 2) the procedure of converting the daily biogas/methane production data from the experimental condition (mesophilic temperature of 38 °C and room pressure) to the standard temperature (0 °C) and pressure (1 atm) condition, 3) the specific methanogenic activity data, and 4) the methane daily production rate data, and 5) the organics biodegradation kinetic rates.
Specifications table
| Subject area | Environmental Engineering |
| More specific subject area | Anaerobic digestion, organic solid waste treatment, biological treatment, bioenergy recovery |
| Type of data | Table, figures |
| How data was acquired | The biogas methane content was measured via gas chromatography (GC). The chemical oxygen demand (COD), carbohydrate, and protein contents of the samples were determined calorimetrically using a DR3900 Hach spectrophotometer. The volume of the biogas produced throughout the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test was measured manually. The production of biogas during the biohydrogen potential test was instantly monitored throughout 72 h. The Minitab Software 17 was used for the statistical analysis. |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed |
| Experimental factors | To analyze the soluble content, the sample was first centrifuged using a Fisher Scientific Sorvall Legend XT centrifuge at 90000 rpm for 30 min. Afterwards, the centrate (permeate) of the centrifuged samples was filtered through 0.45 μm microfiber filters. |
| Experimental features | Three sets of experiment including SMA, BMP, and BHP were conducted. The acetic acid was used as a substrate for the SMA assay. The BMP test was performed with four different organic solid waste including cattle manure, SSO, PS, and TWAS. The substrate for the BHP experiment was glucose. All the experiments were done in triplicates. |
| Data source location | Toronto, Canada |
| Data accessibility | Data are presented in this article |
| Related research article | [1] E. Hosseini Koupaie, A. Azizi, A.A. Bazyar Lakeh, H. Hafez, E. Elbeshbishy, Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes, Waste Manage., 87 (2019) 228–236. |
Value of the Data
|
1. Data
The measured biogas production data during the SMA, BHP, and BHP experiments are presented in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3, respectively. The converted values to the standard temperature (°C) and pressure (1 atm) condition are shown in Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, respectively. Table 7 presents the daily methane production rate of the SMA digesters at the standard temperature and pressure condition. Fig. 1 illustrates the cumulative methane production of the SMA digesters during the initial operation period along with the linear regression equation of the best-fitted line to each graph. The slope of the linear regression was used to determine the specific methanogenic activity illustrated in Fig. 2. Fig. 3 shows the first-order specific TCOD removal rate constant of the BMP digesters.
Table 1.
Daily biogas production data from the SMA reactors at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).
| Day | F/M = 0.25 |
F/M = 0.5 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD digestate | STDEV | AD cake | STDEV | AD digestate | STDEV | AD cake | STDEV | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 16 | 2 | 19 | 3 | 20 | 5 | 24 | 2 |
| 2 | 25 | 2 | 32 | 9 | 31 | 4 | 34 | 12 |
| 3 | 36 | 4 | 50 | 6 | 41 | 11 | 59 | 17 |
| 4 | 50 | 12 | 57 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 86 | 15 |
| 5 | 57 | 6 | 59 | 11 | 56 | 14 | 104 | 14 |
| 8 | 83 | 11 | 94 | 8 | 79 | 12 | 164 | 20 |
| 9 | 96 | 13 | 116 | 18 | 93 | 12 | 185 | 13 |
| 11 | 108 | 11 | 144 | 11 | 111 | 16 | 227 | 17 |
| 12 | 124 | 14 | 163 | 7 | 138 | 15 | 267 | 10 |
| 15 | 154 | 9 | 208 | 18 | 191 | 21 | 365 | 12 |
| 16 | 159 | 19 | 220 | 20 | 219 | 18 | 406 | 16 |
| 18 | 188 | 19 | 253 | 19 | 260 | 24 | 480 | 14 |
| 19 | 205 | 21 | 270 | 9 | 291 | 14 | 516 | 28 |
| 20 | 221 | 17 | 284 | 17 | 318 | 11 | 544 | 25 |
| 21 | 240 | 18 | 293 | 17 | 345 | 17 | 570 | 27 |
| 22 | 263 | 13 | 306 | 21 | 393 | 14 | 588 | 19 |
| 23 | 279 | 16 | 309 | 19 | 436 | 21 | 599 | 22 |
| 24 | 294 | 11 | 314 | 14 | 485 | 27 | 610 | 24 |
| 25 | 304 | 16 | 316 | 14 | 526 | 21 | 622 | 17 |
| 26 | 317 | 18 | 318 | 20 | 555 | 34 | 627 | 19 |
| 27 | 323 | 31 | 321 | 17 | 581 | 31 | 633 | 16 |
| 28 | 329 | 19 | 323 | 24 | 593 | 16 | 636 | 15 |
| 29 | 334 | 23 | 325 | 24 | 608 | 22 | 641 | 23 |
| 30 | 340 | 23 | 328 | 18 | 618 | 27 | 643 | 19 |
| 31 | 342 | 20 | 332 | 23 | 626 | 21 | 644 | 23 |
| 32 | 342 | 10 | 332 | 25 | 627 | 18 | 646 | 18 |
| 33 | 343 | 17 | 333 | 23 | 628 | 14 | 647 | 17 |
| 34 | 343 | 22 | 334 | 13 | 629 | 22 | 647 | 20 |
| 35 | 344 | 20 | 335 | 23 | 630 | 20 | 647 | 20 |
Table 2.
Daily biohydrogen production data from the BHP reactors at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).
| Time (h) | Digestate | STDEV | Digestate cake | STDEV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| 8 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 4 |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 5 |
| 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
| 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 2 |
| 12 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 3 |
| 13 | 26 | 8 | 19 | 2 |
| 14 | 36 | 20 | 27 | 2 |
| 15 | 50 | 28 | 37 | 5 |
| 16 | 70 | 27 | 50 | 4 |
| 16.5 | 81 | 24 | 56 | 8 |
| 17 | 93 | 21 | 62 | 4 |
| 17.5 | 104 | 29 | 69 | 11 |
| 18 | 118 | 25 | 78 | 7 |
| 18.5 | 132 | 23 | 96 | 16 |
| 19 | 148 | 22 | 122 | 20 |
| 19.5 | 163 | 23 | 149 | 23 |
| 20 | 179 | 17 | 179 | 14 |
| 20.5 | 197 | 21 | 209 | 19 |
| 21 | 216 | 23 | 235 | 22 |
| 21.5 | 236 | 27 | 254 | 16 |
| 22 | 258 | 23 | 271 | 32 |
| 22.5 | 283 | 29 | 288 | 25 |
| 23 | 306 | 21 | 305 | 22 |
| 23.5 | 316 | 23 | 319 | 37 |
| 24 | 332 | 29 | 331 | 33 |
| 24.5 | 346 | 27 | 338 | 43 |
| 25 | 354 | 19 | 345 | 53 |
| 25.5 | 362 | 25 | 350 | 24 |
| 26 | 367 | 27 | 354 | 41 |
| 26.5 | 370 | 23 | 357 | 50 |
| 27 | 372 | 25 | 359 | 34 |
| 27.5 | 375 | 27 | 360 | 34 |
| 28 | 378 | 25 | 362 | 43 |
| 28.5 | 380 | 31 | 363 | 38 |
| 29 | 381 | 29 | 364 | 34 |
| 30 | 382 | 25 | 366 | 43 |
| 31 | 382 | 31 | 367 | 43 |
| 32 | 382 | 27 | 368 | 34 |
| 33 | 382 | 31 | 368 | 34 |
| 34 | 382 | 29 | 368 | 26 |
| 35 | 382 | 25 | 368 | 34 |
| 36 | 382 | 25 | 368 | 26 |
Table 3.
Daily biogas production data from the BMP reactors at a temperature of 38 °C (mL).
| Time (d) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 25 | 28 | 31 | 35 | 42 | |||
| TWAS | Digestate | Average | 0 | 41 | 75 | 95 | 115 | 127 | 146 | 170 | 196 | 233 | 406 | 547 | 762 | 856 | 885 | 896 | 897 | 898 |
| STDEV | 0 | 6 | 15 | 9 | 16 | 10 | 14 | 23 | 17 | 22 | 38 | 45 | 39 | 34 | 34 | 38 | 40 | 42 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 0 | 87 | 126 | 149 | 178 | 201 | 235 | 274 | 314 | 370 | 580 | 707 | 853 | 884 | 922 | 945 | 945 | 950 | |
| STDEV | 0 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 17 | 14 | 18 | 24 | 35 | 48 | 39 | 26 | 58 | 60 | 71 | 71 | 73 | ||
| PS | Digestate | Average | 0 | 24 | 39 | 103 | 151 | 179 | 203 | 210 | 235 | 249 | 308 | 344 | 425 | 595 | 869 | 1015 | 1028 | 1046 |
| STDEV | 2 | 13 | 17 | 48 | 31 | 24 | 20 | 23 | 27 | 31 | 40 | 38 | 19 | 37 | 48 | 20 | 25 | 30 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 0 | 51 | 75 | 123 | 201 | 232 | 264 | 308 | 335 | 374 | 557 | 681 | 858 | 980 | 1055 | 1084 | 1084 | 1084 | |
| STDEV | 2 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 7 | 18 | 13 | 16 | 22 | 37 | 47 | 52 | 55 | 61 | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||
| SSO | Digestate | Average | 0 | 7 | 69 | 135 | 183 | 204 | 222 | 241 | 271 | 334 | 657 | 807 | 1020 | 1146 | 1234 | 1280 | 1300 | 1300 |
| STDEV | 60 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 16 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 51 | 66 | 49 | 62 | 52 | 57 | 54 | 54 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 41 | 84 | 144 | 206 | 239 | 259 | 307 | 394 | 503 | 606 | 872 | 986 | 1128 | 1215 | 1265 | 1265 | 1265 | 1265 | |
| STDEV | 1 | 7 | 15 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 33 | 45 | 52 | 56 | 79 | 78 | 96 | 111 | 109 | 109 | 109 | 109 | ||
| Manure | Digestate | Average | 0 | 12 | 40 | 77 | 137 | 182 | 243 | 307 | 370 | 434 | 589 | 640 | 720 | 785 | 833 | 854 | 856 | 863 |
| STDEV | 2 | 6 | 17 | 25 | 32 | 46 | 51 | 43 | 66 | 64 | 74 | 45 | 84 | 56 | 36 | 40 | 59 | 50 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 0 | 32 | 87 | 166 | 288 | 382 | 488 | 551 | 605 | 643 | 722 | 750 | 786 | 804 | 815 | 827 | 831 | 835 | |
| STDEV | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 26 | 35 | 44 | 53 | 59 | 70 | 74 | 77 | 81 | 83 | 88 | 88 | 88 | ||
Table 4.
Converted daily biogas production data from the SMA reactors to the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).
| Day | F/M = 0.25 |
F/M = 0.5 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD digestate | STDEV | AD cake | STDEV | AD digestate | STDEV | AD cake | STDEV | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 14 | 2 | 17 | 3 | 18 | 5 | 21 | 2 |
| 2 | 23 | 2 | 28 | 8 | 28 | 3 | 30 | 10 |
| 3 | 32 | 3 | 44 | 5 | 36 | 10 | 52 | 15 |
| 4 | 44 | 10 | 50 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 76 | 14 |
| 5 | 51 | 5 | 53 | 10 | 50 | 13 | 92 | 13 |
| 8 | 74 | 10 | 83 | 7 | 70 | 11 | 145 | 18 |
| 9 | 85 | 11 | 103 | 16 | 82 | 11 | 164 | 11 |
| 11 | 96 | 10 | 128 | 9 | 98 | 14 | 201 | 15 |
| 12 | 110 | 13 | 144 | 6 | 123 | 13 | 236 | 9 |
| 15 | 136 | 8 | 184 | 16 | 170 | 19 | 324 | 10 |
| 16 | 141 | 17 | 195 | 18 | 194 | 16 | 360 | 14 |
| 18 | 167 | 17 | 224 | 17 | 231 | 21 | 426 | 12 |
| 19 | 182 | 18 | 239 | 8 | 258 | 12 | 457 | 25 |
| 20 | 196 | 15 | 252 | 15 | 282 | 10 | 482 | 22 |
| 21 | 212 | 16 | 260 | 15 | 306 | 15 | 506 | 24 |
| 22 | 233 | 12 | 271 | 19 | 348 | 12 | 521 | 17 |
| 23 | 247 | 14 | 274 | 16 | 386 | 19 | 531 | 19 |
| 24 | 260 | 10 | 278 | 13 | 430 | 24 | 541 | 21 |
| 25 | 269 | 14 | 280 | 12 | 466 | 19 | 551 | 15 |
| 26 | 281 | 16 | 282 | 18 | 492 | 30 | 555 | 17 |
| 27 | 286 | 28 | 285 | 15 | 515 | 28 | 561 | 14 |
| 28 | 292 | 17 | 286 | 21 | 526 | 15 | 564 | 13 |
| 29 | 296 | 21 | 288 | 22 | 539 | 20 | 568 | 20 |
| 30 | 301 | 20 | 291 | 16 | 547 | 24 | 570 | 17 |
| 31 | 303 | 17 | 294 | 20 | 555 | 18 | 571 | 20 |
| 32 | 304 | 9 | 295 | 22 | 556 | 16 | 572 | 16 |
| 33 | 304 | 15 | 295 | 20 | 557 | 12 | 573 | 15 |
| 34 | 304 | 20 | 296 | 11 | 558 | 20 | 574 | 18 |
| 35 | 304 | 17 | 297 | 20 | 558 | 18 | 574 | 18 |
Table 5.
Converted daily biohydrogen production data from the BHP reactors to the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).
| Time (h) | Digestate | STDEV | Digestate cake | STDEV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| 9 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| 10 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 4 |
| 11 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 2 |
| 12 | 16 | 9 | 12 | 2 |
| 13 | 23 | 7 | 17 | 2 |
| 14 | 32 | 18 | 24 | 2 |
| 15 | 44 | 25 | 33 | 4 |
| 16 | 62 | 24 | 44 | 4 |
| 16.5 | 71 | 21 | 50 | 7 |
| 17 | 82 | 19 | 55 | 4 |
| 17.5 | 92 | 25 | 61 | 10 |
| 18 | 104 | 23 | 69 | 6 |
| 18.5 | 117 | 20 | 85 | 14 |
| 19 | 131 | 20 | 108 | 17 |
| 19.5 | 145 | 20 | 132 | 20 |
| 20 | 159 | 15 | 159 | 13 |
| 20.5 | 175 | 19 | 185 | 17 |
| 21 | 191 | 20 | 208 | 19 |
| 21.5 | 209 | 24 | 225 | 14 |
| 22 | 228 | 20 | 240 | 28 |
| 22.5 | 251 | 25 | 255 | 23 |
| 23 | 271 | 19 | 270 | 20 |
| 23.5 | 280 | 20 | 283 | 33 |
| 24 | 295 | 25 | 293 | 29 |
| 24.5 | 307 | 24 | 300 | 38 |
| 25 | 314 | 17 | 306 | 47 |
| 25.5 | 321 | 22 | 310 | 21 |
| 26 | 325 | 24 | 314 | 36 |
| 26.5 | 328 | 20 | 316 | 45 |
| 27 | 330 | 22 | 318 | 30 |
| 27.5 | 333 | 24 | 320 | 30 |
| 28 | 335 | 22 | 321 | 38 |
| 28.5 | 337 | 27 | 322 | 34 |
| 29 | 337 | 25 | 323 | 31 |
| 30 | 338 | 22 | 324 | 38 |
| 31 | 338 | 27 | 325 | 38 |
| 32 | 338 | 24 | 326 | 31 |
| 33 | 338 | 27 | 326 | 31 |
| 34 | 338 | 25 | 326 | 23 |
| 35 | 338 | 22 | 326 | 31 |
| 36 | 338 | 22 | 326 | 23 |
Table 6.
Converted daily biogas production data from the BMP reactors to the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).
| Time (d) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 25 | 28 | 31 | 35 | 42 | |||
| TWAS | Digestate | Average | 0 | 36 | 66 | 84 | 102 | 112 | 129 | 151 | 174 | 207 | 360 | 485 | 675 | 759 | 785 | 794 | 795 | 796 |
| STDEV | 0 | 5 | 13 | 8 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 15 | 19 | 33 | 40 | 35 | 30 | 30 | 34 | 35 | 38 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 0 | 77 | 112 | 132 | 158 | 178 | 208 | 243 | 278 | 328 | 514 | 626 | 756 | 783 | 817 | 838 | 838 | 842 | |
| STDEV | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 31 | 42 | 35 | 23 | 51 | 53 | 63 | 63 | 64 | ||
| PS | Digestate | Average | 0 | 21 | 34 | 91 | 134 | 158 | 180 | 186 | 208 | 221 | 273 | 304 | 376 | 528 | 770 | 899 | 911 | 927 |
| STDEV | 1 | 12 | 15 | 43 | 28 | 21 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 28 | 36 | 33 | 17 | 33 | 43 | 18 | 22 | 27 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 0 | 45 | 66 | 109 | 178 | 205 | 234 | 273 | 297 | 332 | 494 | 603 | 760 | 869 | 935 | 960 | 960 | 960 | |
| STDEV | 1 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 12 | 15 | 19 | 33 | 42 | 46 | 48 | 54 | 59 | 59 | 59 | ||
| SSO | Digestate | Average | 0 | 6 | 61 | 120 | 162 | 180 | 196 | 214 | 240 | 296 | 582 | 715 | 904 | 1016 | 1094 | 1135 | 1152 | 1152 |
| STDEV | 53 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 45 | 58 | 43 | 55 | 47 | 51 | 47 | 47 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 37 | 74 | 127 | 182 | 212 | 230 | 272 | 349 | 445 | 537 | 773 | 874 | 1000 | 1077 | 1121 | 1121 | 1121 | 1121 | |
| STDEV | 1 | 6 | 13 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 30 | 40 | 46 | 50 | 70 | 69 | 85 | 99 | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 | ||
| Manure | Digestate | Average | 0 | 10 | 36 | 69 | 121 | 161 | 216 | 272 | 328 | 385 | 522 | 567 | 638 | 696 | 739 | 757 | 759 | 765 |
| STDEV | 1 | 5 | 15 | 22 | 29 | 40 | 45 | 38 | 58 | 57 | 66 | 40 | 75 | 49 | 32 | 35 | 53 | 44 | ||
| Digestate cake | Average | 0 | 29 | 77 | 147 | 255 | 338 | 433 | 488 | 536 | 570 | 640 | 665 | 697 | 712 | 723 | 733 | 736 | 740 | |
| STDEV | 1 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 23 | 31 | 39 | 47 | 53 | 62 | 66 | 69 | 72 | 74 | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||
Table 7.
Daily methane production rate of the SMA digesters at the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL/g TCODadded.d).
| Day | F/M = 0.25 |
F/M = 0.5 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD digestate | STDEV | AD cake | STDEV | AD digestate | STDEV | AD cake | STDEV | |
| 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 14.0 | 3.8 | 17.0 | 5.4 | 9.1 | 4.6 | 10.7 | 2.2 |
| 2 | 9.0 | 1.6 | 11.9 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 3.1 |
| 3 | 10.3 | 2.2 | 17.3 | 4.0 | 4.9 | 2.7 | 12.1 | 7.0 |
| 4 | 10.8 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 10.8 | 3.9 |
| 5 | 8.2 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 9.4 | 2.6 |
| 8 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 10.1 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 8.9 | 2.2 |
| 9 | 12.9 | 3.4 | 23.7a | 7.2 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 11.2 | 1.6 |
| 11 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 12.9 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 9.6 | 1.4 |
| 12 | 11.0 | 2.5 | 12.9 | 1.1 | 9.8 | 2.1 | 14.0 | 1.0 |
| 15 | 9.2 | 1.1 | 13.7 | 2.3 | 8.1 | 1.8 | 15.1 | 1.0 |
| 16 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 12.7 | 2.3 | 14.0 | 2.3 | 20.4a | 1.6 |
| 18 | 12.7 | 2.5 | 14.3 | 2.1 | 9.0 | 1.6 | 16.3 | 0.9 |
| 19 | 15.6 | 3.1 | 15.6 | 1.0 | 13.7 | 1.3 | 16.0 | 1.8 |
| 20 | 14.0 | 2.1 | 12.4 | 1.5 | 12.1 | 0.9 | 12.7 | 1.2 |
| 21 | 16.8 | 2.5 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 12.5 | 1.2 | 11.9 | 1.1 |
| 22 | 21.1a | 2.1 | 11.8 | 1.6 | 21.3 | 1.5 | 7.8 | 0.5 |
| 23 | 14.1 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 0.4 | 19.5 | 1.9 | 5.1 | 0.4 |
| 24 | 13.8 | 1.0 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 22.4a | 2.5 | 5.1 | 0.4 |
| 25 | 8.9 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 18.3 | 1.5 | 5.2 | 0.3 |
| 26 | 11.7 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 13.1 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 0.1 |
| 27 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 11.8 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0.1 |
| 28 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 5.5 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.1 |
| 29 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 6.7 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| 30 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 31 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| 32 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| 33 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| 34 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 35 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
The maximum daily methane production rate values are highlighted in blue.
Fig. 1.
Cumulative methane production of the SMA digesters during the initial operation period.
Fig. 2.
The specific methanogenic activity of the SMA digesters (determined via the slope of the best-fitted line to the Fig. 1 graphs).
Fig. 3.
First-order specific TCOD removal rate constant of the BMP digesters.
2. Experimental design, materials, and methods
2.1. Data analysis procedures
The conversion of measured biogas volume data from the experimental conditions to the standard temperature and pressure condition was done using Eq. (1).
| (1) |
where.
: Biogas volume at the standard temperature and pressure condition (mL).
: Measured biogas volume (mL).
: Standard temperature (273.15).
: Digester temperature (273.15 + 38 = 311.15).
: Pressure at the time of measuring the biogas volume (atm).
: Standard pressure (1 atm).
The daily methane production rate was determined via Eq. (2)
| (2) |
: Daily methane production rate (mL/g TCODadded.d).
: Cumulative biogas production yield until ith measurement (mL/g TCODadded).
: Cumulative biogas production until (i+1)th measurement (mL/g TCODadded).
: Time difference between the ith and (i+1)th biogas measurement (d).
Previous studies have proven that the first-order reaction model can represent the biogas production as well as the organics removal during the AD process [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Eq. (3) shows the first-order reaction model that was utilized to calculate the specific reaction rate constant of the BMP digesters.
| (3) |
in which rsu, C and k are TCOD removal rate (mg/L.d), TCOD concentration (mg/L) and first-order specific rate constant (1/d), respectively. Eq. (4) is derived after integration and rearrangement of Eq. (3).
| (4) |
in which Lt, Lu and t are TCOD concentration in the digester at time t (mg/L), ultimate biodegradable TCOD (mg/L) and digestion time, respectively.
2.2. Analytical procedure
The methane content of the produced biogas was measured with a Thermo Scientific Trace 1310 gas chromatograph (GC). The GC had a TG-Bond Msieve 5A packed column with diameter and length of 0.53 mm and 30 m, respectively. It was also equipped with a thermal conductivity detector running at the oven, detector, and filament temperatures of 80, 100, and 250 °C, respectively. The chemical oxygen demand (COD), carbohydrate, and protein contents of the samples were determined calorimetrically using a DR3900 Hach spectrophotometer. The volume of the biogas produced throughout the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test was measured with a 100 mL air-tight glass syringe (Poulten & Graf Fortuna™). The production of biogas during the biohydrogen potential test was monitored using an AMPTS II gas-measuring device (Bioprocess Control, Lund, Sweden). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Minitab Software 17. The COD analysis was carried out using the closed reflux colorimetric method described by the Standard Methods [7]. The analyses of carbohydrate and protein were performed according to the colorimetric methods developed by Dubios et al. (1956) and Frolund et al. (1995), respectively [8], [9].
Acknowledgments
The financial support from the Southern Ontario Water Consortium (SOWC) is much appreciated.
Footnotes
Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103913.
Transparency document
The following is the transparency document related to this article:
Multimedia Component 1
References
- 1.Hosseini Koupaie E., Azizi A., Bazyar Lakeh A.A., Hafez H., Elbeshbishy E. Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. Waste Manage. 2019;87:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eskicioglu C., Kennedy K.J., Droste R.L. Characterization of soluble organic matter of waste activated sludge before and after thermal pretreatment. Water Res. 2006;40:3725–3736. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hosseini Koupaie E., Johnson T., Eskicioglu C. Comparison of different electricity-based thermal pretreatment methods for enhanced bioenergy production from municipal sludge. Molecules. 2018;23:1–15. doi: 10.3390/molecules23082006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Coelho N.M.G., Droste R.L., Kennedy K.J. Evaluation of continuous mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of microwaved activated sludge. Water Res. 2011;45:2822–2834. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Razavi A., Koupaie E.H., Azizi A., Hafez H., Elbeshbishy E. Hydrothermal pretreatment of source separated organics for enhanced solubilization and biomethane recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;274:502–511. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hosseini Koupaie E. School of Engineering. University of British Columbia, BC; Canada: 2017. Radio frequency sludge hydrolysis as an energy efficient alternative to microwave and conductive heating for advanced anaerobic digestion. [Google Scholar]
- 7.APHA . twentieth ed. American Public Health Association; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for the determination of sugar and related substances. Anal. Chem., Anal. Chem. 1956;28:350–356. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Frolund B., Griebe T., Nielsen P.H. Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995;43:755–761. doi: 10.1007/BF00164784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Multimedia Component 1



