Skip to main content
Pulse logoLink to Pulse
. 2019 Feb 5;6(3-4):169–186. doi: 10.1159/000496150

Genome-Wide Association Studies of Hypertension and Several Other Cardiovascular Diseases

Yan Wang 1, Ji-Guang Wang 1,*
PMCID: PMC6489084  PMID: 31049317

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have greatly expanded our understanding of the genetic architecture of cardiovascular diseases in the past decade. They have revealed hundreds of suggestive genetic loci that replicate known biological candidate genes and indicate the existence of a previously unsuspected new biology relevant to cardiovascular disorders. These data have been used successfully to create genetic risk scores that may improve risk prediction and the identification of susceptive individuals. Furthermore, these GWAS-identified novel pathways may herald a new era of novel drug development and stratification of patients. In this review, we will briefly summarize the literature on the candidate genes and signals discovered by GWAS on hypertension and coronary artery disease and discuss their implications on clinical medicine.

Keywords: Genome-wide association study, Genetic risk score, Hypertension, Coronary artery disease

Introduction

A large majority of heart diseases are polygenetic, that is, the result of a combination of multiple common genetic variants and environmental factors. Unravelling the genetic basis of heart diseases has proceeded slowly through linkage studies, because of the much smaller effect size attributable to common modifying variants in complex disorders [1]. Chip-based microarray technology for assaying over 1 million interindividual genetic variants provides the foundation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which are defined as any studies of common genetic variation across the entire human genome designed to identify genetic associations with observable traits [2]. The common variants usually refer to those with a prevalence of at least 5% in a population. A stringent genome-wide significance threshold of p < 5E–8 is routinely used as a correction for multiple testing, which is based on the estimation of approximately 1 million independent SNPs in a population [3].

The past decade has witnessed substantial advances in understanding the genetic basis of heart diseases through GWAS. Furthermore, HapMap- and 1000 Genomes Project-based meta-analyses including hundreds of thousands of subjects have expanded our understanding of the genetic architecture of heart diseases to a great extent. In the GWAS catalog (www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/), hundreds of loci have been reported that show an association with more than 10 heart diseases or traits; the major achievements are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Genome-wide association studies of hypertension and several other cardiovascular diseases and abnormalities

Study [Ref.], year Initial sample size, n Replication sample size, n Major ethnic group Top locus
Blood pressure        
Levyet al.[8], 2009 29,136 34,433 European SH2B3
Newton-Chehet al.[7], 2009 34,433 113,236 European CNNM2
Kato et al. [12], 2011 19,608 30,765 Asian HECTD4
Wainet al. [10], 2011 74,064 48,607 European ATXN2
Ehret et al. [9], 2011 69,395 133,361 European CSK
Warren et al. [11], 2017 140,886 190,318 European JAG1

Coronary artery disease        
Samani et al. [17], 2007 4,864 2,519 European CDKN2B-AS1 - DMRTA1
Helgadottir et al. [42], 2007 8,335 9,289 European CDKN2B-AS1 - DMRTA1
Trégouët et al. [43], 2009 4,864 14,398 European LPA
Erdmannet al. [44], 2009 2,520 38,253 European MRAS
Reillyet al. [45], 2011 2,723 17,053 European ADAMTS7
C4DGeneticsConsortium et al. [46], 2011 30,482 40,593 European, Asian PHACTR1
Schunkert et al. [47], 2011 86,995 56,682 European CDKN2B-AS1
Lu et al. [48], 2012 6,534 26,932 Asian CDKN2B-AS1
Nikpay et al. [19], 2015 187,599 None European, Asian CDKN2B-AS1
Nelson et al. [20], 2017 63,731 276,868 European, CDKN2B-AS1

Congestive heart failure        
Smith et al. [49], 2010 23,821 None European, African LRIG3

Dilated cardiomyopathy        
Villard et al. [50], 2011 2,287 2,467 European TSPB7

Atrial fibrillation        
Gudbjartsson et al. [51], 2009 36,137 8,855 European ZFHX3
Ellinor et al. [52], 2010 14,179 4,771 European KCNN3
Ellinor et al. [53], 2012 59,133 5,381 European PITX2 - MIR297
Lowet al. [54], 2017 36,792 257,896 Asian, European PITX2 - MIR297

Electrocardiographic abnormalities in the PR interval      
Pfeufer et al. [55], 2010 28,517 None European SCN10A
Chambers et al. [56], 2010 6,543 6,243 Asian SCN10A

QRS duration        
Sotoodehnia et al. [57], 2010 40,407 7,170 European SCN10A

QT interval        
Arking et al. [58], 2006 200 4,451 European NOS1AP, LOC105371475
Newton-Cheh et al. [59], 2009 13,685 15,854 European LOC107985450 - NOS1AP
Arking et al. [60], 2014 70,389 33,316 European LOC107985450 – NOS1AP

Heart rate        
den Hoed et al. [61], 2013 92,355 88,823 European MYH6
Nolte et al. [62], 2017 26,523 38,558 European, Hispanic, African American NDUFA11

Dyslipidemia        
Saxena et al. [63], 2007 5,217 None European APOC1 – APOC1P1
Kooner et al. [64], 2008 2,011 10,536 European, Mexican, Asian MLXIPL
Kathiresan et al. [35], 2008 19,840 20,623 European HERPUD1 – CETP
Sandhu et al. [65], 2008 11,685 4,979 European CELSR2 - PSRC1
Teslovich et al. [16], 2010 96,598 None European ZPR1
Kim et al. [66], 2011 12,545 30,395 Asian ZPR1
Willer et al. [67], 2013 94,595 93,982 European LDLR
Ko et al. [68], 2014 3,323 6,017 Mexican ZPR1
Surakka et al. [69], 2015 62,166 None European APOE

In this review, we will give a brief summary of the achievements of GWAS regarding blood pressure (BP) and coronary artery disease (CAD), the progress in risk prediction at individual level, the novel pathophysiological pathways, and drug discoveries.

GWAS-Significant Loci

Blood Pressure

BP is a quantitative trait, normally distributed in the general population, whereas 30–50% of the variation in BP is determined by inherited genetic factors [4, 5]. Hypertension ranks as the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, contributing to CAD, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure, so that the knowledge about the genetics of hypertension or BP is an important factor in the diagnosis, control, and treatment of all of these heart diseases.

Until the middle of 2017, GWAS have identified and replicated genetic variants of modest or weak effect on BP over 200 loci; the strongest SNPs associated with different BP traits are summarized in Table 2a and b. However, the attempts to identify genetic variants associated with BP have been challenging and of relatively low yield in the early phase. In 2007, the first GWAS (by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium [WTCCC]) [6] adopted a case-control study design using 3,000 shared controls and 14,000 cases (2,000 for hypertension) of European ancestry to study 7 complex diseases simultaneously. Hypertension was the only disease without any significant results. The first GWAS of quantitative BP phenotypes was conducted in the Framingham Heart Study, which included 1,400 family subjects and found no significant results either [5]. These two studies let researchers realize the complexity of the genetic mechanisms underlying BP regulation and the need for much larger sample sizes when looking for genes associated with BP/hypertension.

Table 2.

Significant genetic loci for blood pressure and hypertension reported in genome-wide association studies in Europeans (a) and Asians and Africans (b)

Chr Strongest
SNP
Position EA EAF OR or BETA p value N Closest gene Trait Ref.
a
1
Europeans
rs1886773
1319056 A 0.03 −0.63 1.90E–10 233,789 NADK, CPSF3L PP [11]
1 rs14057 6623180 A 0.35 −0.3 2.50E–10 329,584 RNF207 SBP [11]
1 rs9662255 9381890 A 0.43 −0.21 1.90E–10 310,618 chr1mb9 PP [11]
1 rs880315 10736809 C 0.35 0.64 9.10E–16 133,125 CASZ1 SBP [70]
1 rs17367504 11802721 G 0.15 −0.53 2.68E–18 149,714 MTHFR, NPPB DBP [70]
1 rs12744757 11846764 T 0.06 −0.7 7.54E–23 359,786 NPPA-AS1, NPPA SBP [70]
1 rs1042010 15467418 A 0.19 −0.41 3.03E–13 345,219 CELA2A SBP [70]
1 rs1048238 16015154 T 0.57 0.37 8.09E–07 140,299 HSPB7 SBP [70]
1 rs6686889 24703979 T 0.25 0.19 3.60E–09 322,575 chr1mb25 DBP [11]
1 rs871524 37945773 A 0.33 0.23 1.27E–11 304,987 INPP5B PP [70]
1 rs4360494 37990219 C 0.55 0.28 3.70E–16 282,851 SF3A3 PP [11]
1 rs112557609 56111252 A 0.35 0.23 6.80E–12 325,952 RP4–710M16.1, PPAP2B PP [11]
1 rs3889199 59188070 A 0.71 0.35 1.80E–24 329,486 FGGY PP [11]
1 rs61767086 88600899 G 0.14 −0.41 1.90E–09 136,914 PKN2-AS1 PP [70]
1 rs10922502 88894475 A 0.62 −0.38 2.20E–15 323,666 GTF2B SBP [11]
1 rs12129649 112688881 T 0.06 0.55 5.93E–19 343,172 MOV10 DBP [70]
1 rs11466111 115286557 T 0.02 0.65 5.08E–10 319,490 chr1mb115 DBP [11]
1 rs12405515 172388301 T 0.56 −0.17 1.40E–09 328,543 DNM3 DBP [11]
1 rs12408022 217545447 T 0.26 0.2 2.40E–10 320,983 GPATCH2 DBP [11]
1 rs10916082 227064925 A 0.73 −0.18 8.40E–09 327,636 CDC42BPA DBP [11]
1 rs2760061 228003374 A 0.47 0.23 2.10E–16 312,761 WNT3A DBP [11]
1 rs953492 243307890 A 0.46 0.22 7.40E–16 325,253 SDCCAG8 DBP [11]

2 rs2289081 20682080 C 0.36 −0.22 5.50E–12 329,140 C2orf43 PP [11]
2 rs55701159 24916727 T 0.89 0.29 7.20E–11 321,052 ADCY3 DBP [11]
2 rs1275988 26691496 T 0.61 −0.58 2.35E–15 149,285 KCNK3 SBP [70]
2 rs7562 28412873 T 0.52 0.26 1.90E–08 319,942 FOSL2 SBP [11]
2 rs13420463 37290423 A 0.77 0.36 7.00E–11 330,307 PRKD3 SBP [11]
2 rs4952611 40340603 T 0.58 −0.16 4.00E–08 309,395 SLC8A1 DBP [11]
2 rs76326501 42940738 A 0.91 0.42 3.60E–18 318,127 AC016735.1 DBP [11]
2 rs72876037 42967456 T 0.12 −0.53 1.65E–14 319,468 HAAO, ZFP36L2 SBP [70]
2 rs11690961 46136197 A 0.88 0.34 3.90E–12 327,847 PRKCE PP [11]
2 rs74181299 65056838 T 0.62 0.23 9.60E–13 324,224 CEP68 PP [11]
2 rs11689667 85264242 T 0.54 0.18 1.70E–08 330,634 TCF7L1 PP [11]
2 rs2579519 96009418 T 0.63 −0.2 4.80E–12 311,557 GPAT2, FAHD2CP DBP [11]
2 rs62167177 145181135 T 0.14 −0.26 1.04E–09 289,338 TEX41 DBP [11]
2 rs1446468 164106976 C 0.55 0.54 2.98E–13 141,331 FIGN, GRB14 SBP [70]
2 rs79146658 178921341 T 0.91 −0.31 2.40E–10 321,318 CCDC141 DBP [11]
2 rs13407401 179850979 A 0.29 −0.43 4.30E–08 145,919 ZNF385B SBP [70]
2 rs144073138 182410033 G 0.06 0.35 1.90E–08 295,411 PDE1A DBP [11]
2 rs7592578 190574865 T 0.19 −0.24 9.50E–12 304,672 TMEM194B DBP [11]
2 rs55780018 207661416 T 0.54 −0.39 5.90E–16 304,567 METTL21A, AC079767.3 SBP [11]
2 rs1250259 215435759 A 0.74 −0.31 8.70E–19 325,485 FN1 PP [11]
2 rs10932679 216787868 T 0.19 −0.23 1.70E–08 371,085 LOC101928278 PP [70]
2 rs1063281 217804009 T 0.6 −0.2 1.30E–12 315,354 TNS1 DBP [11]

3 rs142892876 1110752 T 0.001 10.69 5.00E–08 19,546 CNTN6 DBP [71]
3 rs11716531 27415717 A 0.24 0.21 5.72E–14 373,386 SLC4A7 DBP [70]
3 rs13082711 27496418 C 0.23 0.33 2.72E–10 146,340 SLC4A7 DBP [70]
3 rs36022378 49876272 T 0.8 −0.2 4.70E–09 319,983 CAMKV, ACTBP13 DBP [11]
3 rs743757 50438947 C 0.14 0.25 2.40E–10 328,836 CACNA2D2 DBP [11]
3 rs9827472 56692618 T 0.37 −0.18 4.30E–10 323,058 FAM208A DBP [11]
3 rs9834975 122398816 T 0.44 0.15 1.14E–08 330,670 chr3mb122 DBP [11]
3 rs62270945 128483046 T 0.03 0.61 1.80E–09 279,925 GATA2 PP [11]
3 rs9859176 134281183 T 0.4 0.32 1.30E–11 322,428 RYK SBP [11]
3 rs143112823 154990178 A 0.09 −0.4 1.40E–14 297,343 RP11–439C8.2 DBP [11]
3 rs419076 169383098 T 0.47 0.41 1.78E–13 193,725 MECOM SBP [9]
3 rs12374077 185599886 C 0.35 0.16 9.20E–09 327,513 SENP2 DBP [11]
3 rs528908640 193644588 C 0.0005 14.67 2.00E–08 19,546 OPA1 DBP [71]
3 rs9815354 41912651 A 0.17 0.4 7.12E–11 135,381 ULK4 DBP [70]

4 rs871606 53933078 C 0.1 −0.5 1.53E–10 144,494 CHIC2 PP [70]
4 rs17004869 80283879 T 0.05 0.72 1.02E–09 278,498 FGF5 SBP [11]
4 rs2014912 85794517 C 0.85 −0.42 3.86E–10 143,933 ARHGAP24 PP [70]
4 rs13107325 102267552 T 0.05 −0.68 2.28E–17 150,920 SLC39A8 DBP [9]
4 rs13112725 105990585 C 0.77 0.41 3.11E–16 357,230 NPNT, TBCK SBP [70]
4 rs33966350 110510288 A 0.01 1.66 2.10E–11 216,630 ENPEP SBP [11]
4 rs66887589 119588124 T 0.52 −0.22 3.40E–15 324,397 PDE5A DBP [11]
4 rs78049276 147506351 C 0.13 0.27 1.04E–08 321,315 chr4mb148 PP [11]
4 rs13139571 155724361 C 0.76 0.26 2.17E–10 185,393 GUCY1A3, GUCY1B3 DBP [9]
4 rs1566497 168795997 A 0.42 0.24 1.90E–13 320,948 PALLD PP [11]
4 rs17059668 173663512 C 0.92 −0.33 2.80E–08 313,277 chr4mb174 PP [11]

5 rs1173771 32814922 G 0.6 0.5 1.79E–16 158,664 C5orf23, NPR3 SBP [9]
5 rs10078021 75742606 T 0.63 −0.16 1.30E–08 314,172 POC5 DBP [11]
5 rs10057188 78541966 A 0.46 −0.21 6.70E–11 325,985 LHFPL2 PP [11]
5 rs10059921 88218698 T 0.08 −0.53 4.00E–09 298,543 TMEM161B SBP [11]
5 rs337100 123210816 A 0.41 −0.28 4.61E–09 149,200 PRDM6 - SUMO1P5 PP [70]
5 rs6595838 128532506 A 0.3 0.34 7.60E–12 328,401 FBN2 SBP [11]
5 rs31864 158793185 A 0.55 0.21 5.50E–11 326,557 EBF1 PP [11]
5 rs72812846 173950633 A 0.28 −0.21 2.20E–11 312,601 CPEB4 DBP [11]

6 rs6911827 22130372 T 0.45 0.3 2.00E–10 326,471 CASC15 SBP [11]
6 rs1800562 26092913 A 0.06 0.39 8.69E–17 373,770 HFE DBP [70]
6 rs151168737 31638615 A 0.46 0.25 3.60E–20 315,660 PRRC2A - BAG6 DBP [70]
6 rs805303 31648589 G 0.61 0.38 1.49E–11 201,745 BAT2, BAT5 SBP [9]
6 rs185819 32082290 C 0.51 0.37 1.04E–17 364,144 TNXB SBP [70]
6 rs78648104 50715296 T 0.92 −0.48 1.30E–08 305,426 TFAP2D SBP [11]
6 rs13205180 51967696 T 0.49 0.17 7.00E–10 325,419 PKHD1 DBP [11]
6 rs9372498 118251323 A 0.08 0.33 1.80E–11 330,625 SLC35F1 DBP [11]
6 rs11154027 121460244 T 0.47 0.21 1.10E–10 316,708 GJA1 PP [11]
6 rs13209747 126794309 T 0.45 0.27 1.12E–09 146,105 RSPO3 DBP [70]
6 rs17080102 150683634 C 0.07 −0.57 1.04E–10 147,869 PLEKHG1 DBP [70]
6 rs36083386 152076778 I 0.11 0.44 1.50E–18 323,303 ESR1 PP [11]
6 rs449789 159278093 C 0.14 0.36 2.40E–15 325,584 FNDC1 PP [11]
6 rs147212971 165764963 T 0.06 −0.36 1.60E–09 296,010 PDE10A DBP [11]
6 rs1322639 169187008 A 0.78 0.32 4.80E–17 319,866 THBS2 PP [11]

7 rs6461992 27181212 G 0.93 0.91 8.49E–24 311,598 HOXA3 SBP [11]
7 rs1859168 27202740 C 0.92 0.44 1.85E–20 373,643 HOTTIP DBP [70]
7 rs76206723 40408372 A 0.1 −0.35 7.40E–12 328,162 SUGCT PP [11]
7 rs10260816 45970501 G 0.43 −0.3 5.31E–10 143,371 IGFBP3 PP [70]
7 rs17477177 106771412 C 0.21 0.55 4.14E–22 149,296 PIK3CG PP [70]
7 rs13238550 131374297 A 0.4 0.33 1.90E–12 325,647 MKLN1 SBP [11]
7 rs1011018 139763465 A 0.2 −0.33 1.50E–08 325,110 HIPK2 SBP [11]
7 rs3918226 150993088 T 0.08 0.67 2.27E–13 118,604 NOS3 DBP [70]

8 rs9693857 9409607 T 0.45 −0.34 2.40E–15 374,178 LOC105379231 SBP [70]
8 rs1821002 10782555 G 0.6 −0.42 4.26E–19 323,712 BLK, GATA4 SBP [11]
8 rs10107145 10900703 G 0.53 −0.36 1.44E–17 374,413 XKR6 SBP [70]
8 rs6557876 26043159 T 0.25 −0.37 2.85E–14 369,457 EBF2 SBP [70]
8 rs2978456 42467247 T 0.55 −0.19 1.20E–08 304,964 SLC20A2 PP [11]
8 rs2978098 100664447 A 0.54 0.17 1.50E–09 324,424 SNX31 DBP [11]
8 rs35783704 104954030 A 0.11 −0.41 7.08E–09 349,452 LRP12, ZFPM2 SBP [70]
8 rs2071518 119423572 T 0.17 0.3 1.56E–08 149,046 NOV PP [10]
8 rs894344 134600502 A 0.6 −0.26 3.20E–08 329,834 ZFAT SBP [11]
8 rs4454254 140049929 A 0.63 −0.26 5.10E–16 330,022 TRAPPC9 PP [11]
8 rs62524579 142979538 A 0.53 −0.18 3.80E–09 268,645 RP11–273G15.2 DBP [11]
8 rs4076877 143820544 T 0.05 −0.42 3.57E–08 252,983 chr8mb144 DBP [11]

9 rs872256 2496480 NA NA 0.1 9.00E–09 8,423 SMARCA2, VLDLR SBP [72]
9 rs4364717 21801531 A 0.55 −0.18 1.30E–10 327,173 MTAP DBP [11]
9 rs568998724 107040156 A 0.0007 13.49 3.00E–08 19,546 LOC340512 DBP [71]
9 rs72765298 125138717 T 0.87 −0.37 2.70E–14 316,271 SCAI PP [11]

10 rs9337951 30028144 A 0.34 0.28 2.50E–15 299,646 KIAA1462 PP [11]
10 rs10826995 31793730 T 0.71 −0.21 1.10E–09 327,373 ARHGAP12, ZEB1 PP [11]
10 rs4590817 61707795 G 0.83 −0.44 3.52E–13 146,522 C10orf107 MAP [10]
10 rs932764 94136183 G 0.44 0.48 7.10E–16 160,885 PLCE1 SBP [9]
10 rs112184198 100844757 A 0.1 −0.66 3.60E–18 323,791 PAX2 SBP [11]
10 rs11191548 103086421 T 0.91 1.1 6.90E–26 161,709 NT5C2, CYP17A1 SBP [9]
10 rs10787517 114055047 A 0.62 0.44 3.31E–18 272,852 ADRB1 - RNU6–709P SBP [70]

11 rs2649044 9742422 T 0.55 0.2 1.12E–14 343,652 SWAP70 DBP [70]
11 rs7129220 10328991 G 0.89 −0.62 2.97E–12 182,871 ADM SBP [9]
11 rs177542 16901107 A 0.5 0.24 4.18E–08 143,257 PLEKHA7 DBP [70]
11 rs11030119 27706555 A 0.31 −0.16 2.90E–08 330,002 BDNF DBP [11]
11 rs11442819 45186591 I 0.11 −0.28 7.10E–09 326,483 PRDM11 PP [11]
11 rs751984 61510774 C 0.12 −0.41 1.98E–09 140,821 LRRC10B DBP [70]
11 rs4980532 63913247 T 0.56 0.3 1.53E–10 147,416 RCOR2 PP [70]
11 rs67330701 69312240 T 0.09 −0.37 2.10E–12 276,760 MYEOV DBP [11]
11 rs2289125 89491285 A 0.21 −0.38 9.10E–22 307,682 NOX4 PP [11]
11 rs633185 100722807 G 0.28 −0.56 1.21E–17 160,461 TMEM133, FLJ32810 SBP [9]
11 rs8258 117412960 T 0.38 0.24 2.90E–13 327,038 CEP164 PP [11]
11 rs11222084 130403335 T 0.35 0.35 2.26E–12 139,748 ADAMTS8 PP [70]

12 rs10770612 20077705 A 0.8 0.31 6.90E–15 311,586 PDE3A PP [11]
12 rs73099903 53046995 T 0.07 0.51 1.95E–10 343,318 LOC283335 SBP [70]
12 rs7312464 65980467 G 0.52 0.21 5.35E–10 289,978 chr12mb66 PP [11]
12 rs17249754 89666809 A 0.16 −0.9 6.59E–20 146,304 ATP2B1 SBP [70]
12 rs139236208 94486966 A 0.1 −0.36 1.60E–10 291,244 CCDC41 PP [11]
12 rs3184504 111446804 T 0.47 0.45 3.59E–25 120,633 SH2B3 DBP [9]
12 rs10850519 115490635 C 0.3 −0.21 5.10E–13 327,837 TBX5, TBX3 DBP [11]

13 rs9549328 112981842 T 0.23 0.32 1.50E–08 313,787 MCF2L SBP [11]

14 rs12050260 23291885 T 0.35 0.19 2.60E–08 304,390 MYH6 PP [11]
14 rs8904 35402011 A 0.38 0.31 1.31E–12 365,195 NFKBIA SBP [70]
14 rs9888615 52910822 T 0.29 −0.32 3.50E–10 326,235 FERMT2 SBP [11]
14 rs8016306 63461828 A 0.8 0.34 3.70E–09 329,869 PPP2R5E SBP [11]
14 rs12434998 93989208 C 0.37 −0.19 1.64E–08 315,683 chr14mb94 PP [11]
14 rs9323988 98121293 T 0.63 −0.21 4.10E–11 327,551 RP11–61O1.1 PP [11]

15 rs1036477 48622729 G 0.1 −0.42 3.81E–08 149,967 FBN1 PP [70]
15 rs7178615 66576734 A 0.37 −0.18 2.60E–10 318,076 RP11–321F6.1 DBP [11]
15 rs1563894 68343437 NA NA 0.09 3.00E–08 10,090 ITGA11 SBP [72]
15 rs117539635 69390577 G 0.03 −0.65 2.15E–08 196,789 chr15mb69 DBP [11]
15 rs1378942 74785026 C 0.35 0.42 2.69E–26 163,115 CYP1A1, ULK3 DBP [9]
15 rs6495122 74833304 A 0.42 0.4 1.84E–10 NA CSK, ULK3 DBP [8]
15 rs187680191 76002970 T 0.0006 18.58 3.00E–09 19,546 NRG4 DBP [71]
15 rs62012628 78777658 T 0.29 −0.24 5.10E–12 244,143 ADAMTS7 DBP [11]
15 rs11634851 80736624 G 0.46 0.32 5.38E–14 374,208 FAM108C1 SBP [70]
15 rs2521501 90894158 T 0.31 0.65 5.20E–19 127,208 FURIN, FES SBP [9]
15 rs12906962 94768842 T 0.68 −0.22 5.60E–14 319,952 chr15mb95 DBP [11]
15 rs4984496 96092669 G 0.67 −0.18 2.86E–09 307,660 chr15mb96 DBP [11]

16 rs12921187 4893018 T 0.43 −0.17 2.50E–10 326,469 PPL DBP [11]
16 rs13333226 20354332 A 0.81 0.85 1.50E–13 39,706 UMOD HT [25]
16 rs72799341 30925422 A 0.24 0.19 5.80E–09 324,502 FBXL19 DBP [11]
16 rs56249585 65231799 T 0.53 0.18 8.98E–09 318,082 chr16mb65 PP [11]
16 rs141767645 69869262 T 0.02 1.3 1.90E–08 174,313 NFAT5 PP [11]
16 rs200337503 70084312 I 0.03 1.31 6.88E–13 193,318 NFAT5 PP [11]
16 rs117006983 70721707 A 0.01 0.99 4.10E–12 250,766 VAC14 PP [11]
16 rs11643209 75297146 T 0.42 −0.34 1.80E–12 309,242 CFDP1 SBP [11]
16 rs8059962 81540592 T 0.42 −0.17 1.30E–09 319,839 CMIP DBP [11]
16 rs7500448 83012185 A 0.75 0.33 1.10E–19 321,958 CDH13 PP [11]

17 rs12941318 1430304 T 0.49 −0.27 2.50E–08 299,739 CRK SBP [11]
17 rs7226020 6570508 T 0.56 −0.26 2.30E–14 303,389 KIAA0753 PP [11]
17 rs5417 7281743 A 0.57 0.21 1.10E–13 319,299 TP53, SLC2A4 DBP [11]
17 rs138643143 42557849 A 0.07 0.5 3.30E–09 229,161 KCNH4, HSD17B1 PP [11]
17 rs62080325 43983263 A 0.66 −0.19 4.00E–08 315,689 PYY PP [11]
17 rs12946454 45130754 T 0.28 0.57 1.00E–08 77,690 PLCD3 SBP [7]
17 rs551011992 45851264 G 0.24 −0.33 3.32E–08 275,778 GOSR2 SBP [11]
17 rs17608766 46935905 C 0.14 0.55 1.97E–15 137,066 GOSR2 PP [70]
17 rs79917357 48747312 A 0.17 0.34 5.33E–09 336,863 LOC105371811 –LOC105371812 SBP [70]
17 rs585736 48796910 A 0.03 0.61 2.50E–11 301,845 HOXB7 PP [11]
17 rs12940887 49325445 T 0.37 0.26 1.18E–08 144,603 ZNF652 DBP [70]
17 rs16948048 49363104 G 0.39 0.31 8.24E+04 82,441 PHB, ZNF652 DBP [7]
17 rs740698 62689790 T 0.56 −0.23 3.10E–12 311,450 MRC2 PP [11]
17 rs4459609 63471587 A 0.61 −0.2 2.03E–14 361,581 CYB561, ACE DBP [70]
17 rs4308 63482264 A 0.37 0.21 6.80E–14 319,394 ACE DBP [11]
17 rs2467099 75952964 T 0.22 −0.31 3.30E–08 326,401 ACOX1 SBP [11]
17 rs57927100 77321218 G 0.26 −0.31 4.04E–10 347,188 SPET9 SBP [70]

18 rs7236548 45517785 A 0.18 0.35 2.00E–18 330,075 SLC14A2 PP [11]
18 rs745821 50616484 T 0.76 0.19 1.40E–09 330,954 MAPK4 DBP [11]

19 rs36047283 7255690 G 0.11 −0.8 3.25E–26 281,588 INSR SBP [70]
19 rs2116941 10223767 C 0.81 −0.22 2.77E–08 321,960 chr19mb10 PP [11]
19 rs77279095 11415506 A 0.04 0.86 7.26E–09 224,215 RGL3 SBP [11]
19 rs62104477 29804084 T 0.33 0.18 1.20E–09 320,347 CCNE1 DBP [11]
19 rs9710247 40254542 G 0.45 0.16 1.61E–09 308,028 AKT2 DBP [70]

20 rs6108168 8645624 A 0.25 −0.21 1.10E–11 327,368 PLCB1 DBP [11]
20 rs1327235 10988382 G 0.46 0.3 1.41E–15 158,454 JAG1 DBP [9]
20 rs6081613 19485263 A 0.28 0.26 1.60E–13 315,546 SLC24A3 PP [11]
20 rs80346118 48794612 A 0.15 −0.27 1.10E–12 327,614 PREX1 DBP [11]
20 rs6015450 59176062 G 0.12 0.9 3.87E–23 159,190 EDN3, GNAS SBP [9]

21 rs12627651 43340723 A 0.29 0.32 2.40E–09 121,169 CRYAA, SIK1 DBP [70]

22 rs4819852 20000644 A 0.29 0.26 1.43E–13 367,460 ARVCF PP [70]
22 rs73161324 41642782 T 0.05 0.5 2.80E–11 267,722 XRCC6 PP [11]

b Asians and Africans                
Asians                  
1 rs880315 10736809 C 0.65 0.56 3.05E–10 32,611 CASZ1 DBP [12]
1 rs10745332 112646431 A 0.82 0.96 2.52E–09 46,269 MOV10 SBP [13]

2 rs1344653 19531084 A 0.53 −0.27 7.79E–12 220,853 OSR1 PP [73]
2 rs1275988 26691496 T 0.53 −0.37 4.95E–21 236,311 KCNK3 OH [73]
2 rs7604423 43155602 C 0.66 −0.21 2.40E–08 217,072 NR DBP [73]
2 rs6736587 81628601 C 0.16 −1.38 5.3E–08 NA CTNNA2 OH [74]
2 rs16849225 164050310 C 0.61 0.75 3.45E–11 49,511 GRB14, FIGN SBP [12]

3 rs820430 27507409 A 0.32 0.76 1.36E–12 79,318 SLC4A7 SBP [13]
3 rs9810888 53601568 G 0.39 0.39 4.0E–12 77,555 CACNA1D DBP [13]

4 rs1902859 80236549 C 0.41 1.34 1.76E–22 45,856 FGF5 SBP [13]
4 rs2014912 85794517 T 0.16 0.62 5.37E–17 242,456 ARHGAP24 SBP [73]
4 rs6825911 110460482 C 0.51 0.39 8.96E–09 49,511 ENPEP DBP [12]
4 rs13143871 155698052 T 0.80 0.96 5.16E–08 45,737 GUCY1A3 SBP [13]

5 rs1173766 32804422 C 0.60 0.63 1.95E–08 49,970 NPR3 SBP [12]
5 rs13359291 123140763 A 0.31 0.53 8.88E–16 229,584 PRDM6 SBP [73]
5 rs9687065 149011577 A 0.78 0.26 7.36E–11 259,216 ABLIM3, SH3TC2 DBP [73]

6 rs2021783 32077074 C 0.79 0.49 2.18E–12 78,911 CYP21A2 DBP [13]
6 rs1563788 43340625 T 0.31 0.51 2.22E–16 220,757 ZNF318 SBP [73]
6 rs1474698 56199399 T 0.62 −0.20 4.52E–09 274,981 NR PP [73]

7 rs2107595 19009765 A 0.23 0.31 3.91E–11 209,305 HDAC9 PP [73]
7 rs10260816 45970501 C 0.61 0.31 1.51E–14 207,070 IGFBP3 PP [73]
7 rs17477177 106771412 T 0.77 −0.53 3.69E–12 99,344 PIK3CG PP [73]

10 rs4919669 102712218 A 0.43 −0.65 2.63E–08 NA ARL3 SBP [74]
10 rs284844 102794772 A 0.49 −0.75 1.05E–11 NA WBP1L SBP [74]
10 rs4409766 102856906 T 0.71 1.24 6.08E–17 46,030 CYP17A1 SBP [13]
10 rs11191548 103086421 T 0.74 1.18 3.94E–17 41,315 CNNM2 SBP [12]
10 rs11191580 103146454 T 0.74 0.97 4.44E–15 NA NT5C2 SBP [74]

11 rs4757391 16281393 C 0.28 0.88 5.20E–9 46,336 SOX6 SBP [13]
11 rs751984 61510774 T 0.79 0.33 7.66E–12 233,082 LRRC10B, SYT7 MAP [73]

12 rs12579720 20020830 C 0.32 −0.32 2.2E–16 218,606 PDE3A DBP [73]
12 rs17249754 89666809 G 0.64 1.17 7.72E–20 40,719 ATP2B1 SBP [12]
12 rs3184504 111446804 T 0.46 0.54 2.20E–10 35,342 SH2B3 DBP [73]
12 rs653178 111569952 T 0.50 −0.55 1.20E–08 35,342 ATXN2 DBP [73]
12 rs11066280 112379979 T 0.75 1.01 1.32E–35 46,957 HECTD4 DBP [12]
12 rs35444 115114632 A 0.75 0.52 9.62E–08 29,746 TBX3 DBP [12]
12 rs11067763 115760536 A 0.62 0.51 2E–18 79,651 MED13L DBP [13]

17 rs2240736 61408032 T 0.66 0.35 2.20E–16 217,197 C17orf82, TBX2 MAP [73]

18 rs403814 6282594 A NA 1.15 6.13E–09 NA L3MBTL4 HT [75]

19 rs740406 2232222 A 0.87 −0.55 3.10E–15 193,219 PLEKHJ1, DOT1L PP [73]

20 rs1887320 10985350 A 0.53 0.78 1.48E–08 46,123 JAG1 SBP [13]

Africans
3
rs1717027 41946428 T 0.64 0.49 4.90E–13 29,322 ULK4 HT [76]

6 rs13209747 126794309 T 0.19 0.56 2.40E–11 28,708 RSPO3 DBP [76]
6 rs76987554 133759717 C 0.09 −1.69 2.28E–10 62,297 TARID, TCF21 SBP [15]
6 rs17080102 150683634 C 0.1 −0.74 1.90E–11 29,323 PLEKHG1 DBP [76]

7 rs6969780 27119517 C 0.3 0.46 3.27E–10 85,397 HOXA DBP [15]
7 rs17428471 27298248 T 0.14 1.20 2.00E–12 29,326 HOXA, EVX1 SBP [76]
7 rs11563582 27312031 A 0.13 0.67 1.71E–11 84,816 EVX1, HOXA DBP [15]
7 rs7801190 100860471 C 0.72 1.31 3.40E–08 10,771 SLC12A9 HT [77]

8 rs7006531 94098516 G 0.85 −1.02 5.96E–12 72,887 CDH17 PP [15]
8 rs78192203 141364973 T 0.2 0.84 4.00E–11 62,681 GPR20 DBP [15]

9 rs115795127 83378986 T 0.89 0.17 1.13E–08 32,149 FRMD3 HT [15]

Chr, chromosome; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PP, pulse pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HT, hypertension; OH, orthostatic hypotension; NA, not available.

To enhance the statistical power, international collaborations were established between studies and organized in consortia. Furthermore, detecting associations with BP as a continuous variable rather than in case-control studies also was successful. In 2009, two large-scale meta-analyses of GWAS from the Global Blood Pressure Genetics (Global BPgen) [7] and Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) [8] consortia identified associations withstanding correction for multiple testing (genome-wide significance). Each of the study contained nearly 30,000 subjects at the discovery phase and found 8 genomic loci, among which 3 loci overlapped. In 2011, the International Consortium for Blood Pressure (ICBP) [9] used a multistage design with 200,000 individuals of European descent, replicated the previous 13 loci effectively and discovered 16 new loci significant at the genome-wide level. Then, the ICBP analyzed two derived BP phenotypes: mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure (PP) [10]. This study discovered 4 novel loci for PP and 2 novel loci for mean arterial pressure. The latest GWAS among UK Biobank participants of European ancestry included ∼140,000 subjects from a single source at the discovery phase. With dense 1000 Genomes Project and UK10K imputation, they yielded a data set with ∼9.8 million variants for the meta-analysis. With the help of major international consortia for parallel replication, they included GWAS data from 330,956 individuals in total and reported 107 significant loci, among which 24 were associated with systolic BP (SBP), 41 with diastolic BP (DBP), and 42 with PP [11].

The first large meta-analysis of GWAS on BP traits among East Asians was conducted by the Asian Genetic Epidemiology Network (AGEN) consortium [12]. Our group was one of the 8 groups participating in stage 1 meta-analysis, which included 19,608 individuals totally. After de novo genotyping in two stages of replication involving 10,518 and 20,247 East Asian samples, we confirmed 7 loci previously identified in the European population reported by Global BPgen and CHARGE, and additionally identified 6 novel loci: ST7L-CAPZA1, FIGN-GRB14, ENPEP, NPR3, TBX3, and ALDH2. In another meta-analysis of a Han Chinese population, which involved 11,816 subjects in the discovery stage and 69,146 subjects for replication [13], the authors replicated 8 previously reported loci and 4 novel loci: CASZ1, MOV10, FGF5, CYP17A1, SOX6, ATP2B1, ALDH2, JAG1, CACNA1D, CYP21A2, MED13L, and SLC4A7. These findings suggest a possible presence of allelic heterogeneity in BP regulation between Europeans and Asians and provide new mechanistic insight into hypertension.

African-descent populations are the most ancestral and have smaller regions of linkage disequilibrium due to the accumulation of more recombination events in that group, so that GWAS performed on Africans need more SNPs with better overall genomic coverage [14]. There are fewer loci reaching GWAS significance in African populations than in Europeans or Asians. The largest GWAS performed in an African-origin population analyzed 21 GWAS comprising 31,968 individuals of African ancestry and validated their results with an additional 54,395 individuals from multiethnic studies [15]. The authors found 9 loci with 11 independent variants for either SBP, DBP, hypertension, or combined traits.

Coronary Artery Disease

Heritability of CAD has been estimated between 40 and 60% based on family and twin studies [16]. The first robust locus associated with CAD identified by GWAS was reported in 2007 [6, 17, 18], when three independent groups reported common variants at the 9p21 locus. It was associated with a ∼30% increased risk of CAD per copy of the risk allele. Since then, progressively larger-sample-size meta-analyses of additional GWAS, mainly on subjects of European descent, have identified additional loci of smaller effect size. In 2015, the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium published a GWAS meta-analysis of 185,000 CAD cases and controls, interrogating 6.7 million common variants as well as 2.7 million low-frequency variants [19]. In this study, the authors confirmed most CAD loci known at that time and identified 10 novel loci. The majority of the significant loci had a frequency of more than 5%, which indicated that the genetics of CAD was largely determined by the cumulative effect of multiple common risks of small effect size and strongly supported the common disease/common variant hypothesis. In 2017, Nelson et al. [20] further meta-analyzed the results from 10,801 cases in the UK Biobank against 137,914 controls in combination with the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D 1000 Genomes and the MIGen/CARDIoGRAM Exome chip studies. They found 12 new signals reaching genome-wide significance. They also reported that 304 independent variants meeting the 5% false discovery rate threshold explained 21.2% of CAD heritability. This finding highlighted the importance of the false discovery rate approach in the expansion of associated variants. The strongest SNPs associated with CAD which had reached genome-wide significance are listed in Table 3a and b.

Table 3.

Significant loci for coronary artery disease reported by genome-wide association studies in Europeans (a) and Asians (b)

Chr Strongest SNP Position EA EAF OR or BETA p value n Closest gene Ref.
a
1
Europeans
rs11206510
55030366 T 0.85 1.08 2.34E–08 188,372 PCSK9 [19]
1 rs17114036 56497149 A 0.91 1.17 3.81E–19 133,226 PPAP2B [47]
1 rs629301 109275684 NA NA NA 1.00E–49 NA CELSR2 [78]
1 rs11810571 151789832 G 0.79 1.06 4.34E–08 345,035 TDRKH [20]
1 rs6689306 154423470 A 0.44 1.05 1.50E–09 NA IL6R [20]

2 rs16986953 19742712 A 0.07 1.11 4.80E–10 NA AK097927 [20]
2 rs7568458 85561052 A 0.45 1.06 2.40E–13 NA VAMP5, VAMP8, GGCX [20]
2 rs17678683 144528992 G 0.09 1.10 3.00E–09 179,585 ZEB2, ACO74093.1 [19]
2 rs1250229 215439661 T 0.26 1.07 2.88E–13 270,189 FN1 [20]

3 rs7623687 49411133 A 0.86 1.08 3.54E–10 333,836 RHOA [20]
3 rs142695226 124756354 G 0.14 1.07 1.58E–09 345,188 UMPS, ITGB5 [20]
3 rs9818870 138403280 T 0.15 1.15 7.44E–13 40,773 MRAS [44]
3 rs12493885 154122077 C 0.87 1.07 3.23E–08 251,805 ARHGEF26 [20]

4 rs17087335 56972417 T 0.21 1.06 4.60E–08 NA NOA1, REST [19]
4 rs10857147 80259918 T 0.27 1.05 5.81E–09 345,133 PRDM8, FGF5 [20]
4 rs7678555 119988346 C 0.28 1.05 1.35E–08 345,126 PDE5A, MAD2L1 [20]
4 rs6841581 147480038 A 0.15 1.07 4.60E–10 NA EDNAA [20]

6 rs6909752 22612400 A 0.33 1.05 2.26E–09 343,171 HDGFL1 [20]
6 rs17609940 35067023 G 0.75 1.07 1.36E–08 137,412 ANKS1A [47]
6 rs56336142 39166323 T 0.81 1.07 1.85E–08 188,349 KCNK5 [19]
6 rs12190287 133893387 C 0.62 1.08 1.70E–12 130,888 TCF21 [47]
6 rs10455872 160589086 G 0.07 1.31 1.70E–49 NA LPA [20]
6 rs4252185 160702419 C 0.06 1.34 1.64E–32 NA PLG [19]

7 rs2107595 19009765 A 0.18 1.08 3.40E–13 NA HDAC9 [20]
7 rs11556924 130023656 C 0.62 1.09 9.18E–18 134,200 ZC3HC1 [47]
7 rs3918226 150993088 T 0.07 1.13 1.60E–12 NA NOS3 [20]

8 rs2954029 125478730 A 0.54 1.06 5.20E–13 NA TRIB1 [20]

9 rs579459 133278724 C 0.21 1.10 4.08E–14 123,978 ABO [47]

10 rs2505083 30046193 C 0.39 1.06 6.85E–09 169,421 KIAA1462 [19]
10 rs501120 44258419 T 0.87 1.33 9.46E–08 7,181 CXCL12 [17]
10 rs2246942 89245129 G 0.35 1.08 3.50E–16 NA LIPA [20]
10 rs12413409 102959339 G 0.89 1.12 1.03E–09 129,741 NT5C2, CNNM2, CYP17A1 [47]

11 rs10840293 9729649 A 0.55 1.05   NA SWAP70 [20]
11 rs3993105 13281524 T 0.68 1.05 4.88E–08 340,699 ARNTL [20]
11 rs974819 103789839 T 0.32 1.07 2.41E–09 64,881 PDGFD [46]
11 rs964184 116778201 NA NA NA 2.00E–108 NA ZPR1 [78]

12 rs3184504 111446804 T 0.42 1.07 1.03E–09 NA SH2B3 [19]
12 rs11830157 117827636 G 0.36 1.12 2.12E–09 NA KSR2 [19]
12 rs2244608 120979185 G 0.35 1.05 7.90E–10 345,106 HFN1A [20]

13 rs1924981 28448508 T 0.33 1.05 1.90E–07 NA FLT1 [20]

14 rs2895811 99667605 C 0.43 1.07 1.14E–09 114,238 HHIPL1 [47]

15 rs56062135 67163292 C 0.79 1.07 4.52E–09 184,037 SMAD3 [19]
15 rs7164479 78830712 T 0.58 1.07 6.40E–18 NA ADAMTS7 [20]
15 rs8042271 89030987 G 0.90 1.10 3.68E–08 162,206 MFGE8, ABHD2 [19]
15 rs17514846 90873320 A 0.44 1.05 3.10E–07 NA FURIN, FES [19]

16 rs7500448 83012185 A 0.77 1.06 4.90E–10 337,399 CDH13 [20]

17 rs216172 2223210 C 0.37 1.07 1.15E–09 111,538 SMG6, SRR [47]
17 rs46522 48911235 T 0.53 1.06 1.81E–08 137,633 UBE2Z [47]
17 rs7212798 60936127 C 0.15 1.08 1.88E–08 188,377 BCAS3 [19]

18 rs8082812 8522684 NA NA NA 5.00E–67 NA THEM1S3P - AKR1B1P6 [78]
18 rs663129 60171168 A 0.26 1.06 3.20E–08 NA PMA1P1, MC4R [19]

19 rs6511720 11091630 G 0.88 1.14 7.90E–22 NA LDLR [20]
19 rs12976411 32391114 A 0.09 1.49 1.18E–14 NA ZNF507, LOC400684 [19]
19 rs8108632 41348629 T 0.48 1.05 4.13E–08 345,058 TGFB1 [20]
19 rs4420638 44919689 NA NA NA 1.00E–22 NA APOC1 – APOC1P1 [78]
19 rs1964272 45687010 G 0.52 1.05 2.52E–08 343,548 SNAPD2 [20]

21 rs28451064 34221526 A 0.12 1.14 2.60E–23 NA KCNE2 [20]
21 rs460976 41463567 NA NA NA 1.00E–08 NA MX1 - TMPRSS2 [78]

22 rs180803 24262890 G 0.97 1.20 1.64E–10 174,076 POM121L9P, ADORA2A [19]

bAsians                

2 rs2123536 19745816 T 0.39 1.12 6.83E–11 33,466 TTC32, WDR35 [48]

4 rs1842896 155590307 T 0.76 1.14 1.26E–11 33,466 GUCY1A3 [48]

6 rs9349379 12903725 G 0.349 1.34 8.02E–10 4,496 PHACTR1 [79]
6 rs9268402 32373576 G 0.59 1.16 2.77E–15 33,466 BTNL2, C6orf10 [48]
6 rs12524865 133875536 C 0.61 1.11 1.87E–07 24,724 TCF21 [48]

9 rs10738607 22088095 G 0.64 0.78 2.37E–08 1,237 CDKN2A, CDKN2B [80]

12 rs7136259 89687411 T 0.39 1.11 5.68E–10 33,466 ATP2B1 [48]
12 rs3782889 110912851 C 0.21 1.26 3.95E–14 13,742 MYL2 [81]
12 rs671 111803962 A 0.23 1.43 1.6E–34 12,041 ALDH2 [82]
12 rs11066280 112379979 A 0.17 1.19 1.69E–11 24,741 C12orf51 [48]

Chr, chromosome; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; NA, not available.

Although the majority of GWAS for CAD has been carried out on European populations, there were still important studies performed on Asian and Black populations with smaller sample sizes [19]. Unlike the similar effect sizes of CAD risk alleles in East Asian and European populations, the effect size was apparently attenuated in South Asian and Black populations. The lower level of linkage disequilibrium in the African genome might lead to failure to tag potentially shared causal variants [21].

Clinical Implications

It is undeniable that GWAS have achieved considerable success in exploring the genetic architecture of heart diseases. However, it is important to point out that the significant variant is often merely tagged. The gene indicated by the GWAS signal would not be considered as the causal variant until the functional mechanism can be found. The ultimate goals of the study of the genetics of CAD or hypertension are to understand the pathophysiological mechanism and subsequently to establish risk prediction methods and develop effective therapeutic strategies (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Clinical implications from genome-wide association studies (GWAS).

The effect of the susceptibility variants identified by GWAS is small individually, but their effects are independent and additive, which can be calculated as a genetic risk score (GRS) in an unweighted manner by adding risk allele numbers or with a weighted mean [22]. As DNA is stable over the course of the lifetime, a genetic risk can be ascertained from birth; therefore, GRS may be particularly useful in risk prediction among younger patients in whom the cumulative impact of lifestyle factors is less pronounced.

The interpretation of GWAS often is complicated by the nature of significant loci, which are mostly located in the intergenic region. Bioinformatic approaches could narrow down the list, prioritizing a gene for subsequent functional study according to expression quantitative trait locus [23], genome-wide chromatin profiles of histone modifications, data on transcription factor-binding sites, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing [24], etc. Below, we describe some examples of clinical implications of GWAS results for risk prediction and mechanism interpretation.

Hypertension

With the expansion of significant BP loci by GWAS, robust associations with some biological candidate genes previously suspected to influence BP were detected. The latest GWAS by Warren et al. [11] identified multiple loci involved in BP regulation, including angiotensin-converting enzyme, voltage-dependent calcium channel auxiliary subunit, metallo­endopeptidase/neutral endopeptidase, adrenergic β 2B receptor, and phosphodiesterase 5a. Moreover, in the pathway analysis, they also showed an enrichment of pathways associated with cardiovascular disease, including the α-adrenergic pathway, CXCR4 chemokine signaling pathway, endothelin system, and angiotensin-receptor pathways.

In the ICBP GWAS [10], the difference in SBP and DBP between the top and the bottom quintile of the GRS was 4.6 and 3.0 mm Hg, respectively. Furthermore, the GRS generated by combination of 107 loci by Warren et al. [11] showed that the group with GRS in the lowest quintile had an SBP approximately 9–10 mm Hg lower than those with GRS in the highest quintile. Reductions in BP of such a magnitude might lead to significantly lower cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among hypertensive patients. The GRS could therefore be useful in early life to assess the risk of hypertension and direct dietary or lifestyle modifi­cations.

The GWAS findings had also provided clues for personalized prevention and treatment of hypertension. One good example is the uromodulin gene (UMOD), which was identified in an extreme case-control design [25]: rs13333226-G in UMOD showed an association with lower risk of hypertension and reduced urinary UMOD excretion. Uromodulin is mainly expressed in the thick portion of the ascending limb of the loop of Henle, which indicates that it may participate in BP regulation through an effect on sodium hemostasis. Trudu et al. [26] modeled the effect of UMOD in transgenic mice and demonstrated that uromodulin influenced BP through activation of the renal sodium cotransporter NKCC2. The subjects with the UMOD risk variant had increased UMOD excretion, greater salt sensitivity, hypertension, and a greater BP response to loop diuretics. This finding presents an opportunity for hypertension precision medicine and new drug development.

The AGEN study [12] found an ethnicity-specific locus on 12q24.13, where the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) gene is located. ALDH2 is a key enzyme in the major pathway of alcohol metabolism, and glutamate-lysine substitution (rs671, E504K) produces an inactive subunit of ALDH2, resulting in an inability to metabolize acetaldehyde and subsequent accumulation of acetaldehyde after alcohol intake [27]. The SNP rs671 is not polymorphic in Europeans, but it is close to rs3184504 at the SH2B3 locus, which is significantly associated with BP in Europeans and has no polymorphism in East Asians. This phenomenon indicates the natural selection that has occurred. Furthermore, rs671 displays pleiotropic effects both on risk factors for cardiovascular disease and on CAD susceptibility. Interestingly, the locus exhibits a deleterious effect on BP but has protective effects on HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, which results in a net reduction in CAD risk. Moreover, most of the associations between rs671 and each of the cardiovascular risk factors are influenced by alcohol intake.

Coronary Artery Disease

Since 2007, nearly 70 distinct genetic loci for CAD have been found due to the progressively larger sample sizes. A minority of all these risk variants appears to modulate CAD risk by influencing classic risk factors such as plasma lipids, diabetes, and hypertension, re inforcing the key role for these pathways in the development of CAD. The rest of the risk vari ants identified by GWAS are located in regulatory regions of unclear function.

In a large prospective cohort study with a median of 10.7 years of follow-up, Ripatti et al. [28] found that individuals with a GRS in the top quintile derived from 13 multilocus SNPs of CAD exhibited a 1.66-fold increased risk adjusting for traditional risk factors. However, the GRS did not improve the C-index over the traditional risk factors and family history or the net reclassification of risk categories. A recent survey on 55,685 subjects from three prospective studies and one cross-sectional study confirmed the association between GRS and incidence of CAD [29], with subjects in the top GRS quintiles having a 91% higher relative risk than those in the bottom quintiles. They also reported that a favorable lifestyle was associated with a relative risk of CAD nearly 50% lower than with an unfavorable lifestyle.

The 9p21.3 locus was the first one identified by GWAS, consisting of a cluster of 59 linked SNPs in a 53,000-bp region [30]. Among the CAD risk alleles, rs10811656 and rs10757278 are located in an enhancer element and disrupt a binding site for ATAT1 [31]. This enhancer locus interacts with CDKN2A/B and IFNA21, which encodes interferon-γ in human vascular endothelial cells and participates in the inflammatory process. It is also suggested that this region probably encodes for a long noncoding RNA designated as ANRIL (antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus). ANRIL influences the expression of CDKN2A/B, which is involved in regulating the cell cycle and cellular proliferation [32]. A meta-analysis also confirmed that the 9p21.3 locus increases the burden of atherosclerosis but not the risk of myocardial infarction, which indicated the stimulatory effect of this locus in atherosclerosis [33].

The 1p13 locus has been independently associated with CAD in several GWAS. Among a number of genes located in this region, SORT1 was found as the target one by expression quantitative trait locus and expression studies. SORT1 encodes sortilin, which is a multiligand type 1 receptor and is expressed in many cell and tissue types [34]. Overexpression of Sort1 might decrease the very-low-density lipoprotein secretion rate and increase plasma low-density lipoprotein turnover [35]. However, the knockout or knockdown of Sort1 in different studies resulted in either increased or decreased very-low-density lipoprotein secretion [36, 37]. Whether Sort1 was the gene causing CAD or just a signal found in the GWAS still needs to be clarified. The concrete molecular mechanism by which sortilin influences lipid metabolism and CAD risk has not yet been elucidated.

Perspectives

The GWAS findings have identified novel biological signals involved in human heart diseases. However, there are still certain challenges. The heritability of BP as derived from family studies varies from 30 to 50%, but the collective effect of all BP loci identified through GWAS only explains ∼3.5% of BP heritability. The missing heritability is not unique to BP genetics but is universally observed in almost all common heart diseases. Heritability reflects the degree of phenotypic resemblance between relatives, which not only depends on the genetic architecture contributing to the trait but also is the result of environmental factors and interactions within the genome. In GWAS on hypertension-related phenotypes, significant gene-environment interaction has been identified for alcohol consumption [38], body mass index, smoking [39], educational level, and other modifiable lifestyle factors. These findings may help identify the causal genetic loci that contribute to missing heritability. In addition, gene-gene interaction [40], rare variants [41], and epigenetic mechanisms likely explain a certain fraction of complex heart diseases. Future research will focus on the application of variants identified in GWAS for the identification of individuals at risk of disease, guidance of clinical management decisions, and prediction of prognosis.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • 1.Watkins H, Farrall M. Genetic susceptibility to coronary artery disease: from promise to progress. Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Mar;7((3)):163–73. doi: 10.1038/nrg1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pearson TA, Manolio TA. How to interpret a genome-wide association study. JAMA. 2008 Mar;299((11)):1335–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pe'er I, Yelensky R, Altshuler D, Daly MJ. Estimation of the multiple testing burden for genomewide association studies of nearly all common variants. Genet Epidemiol. 2008 May;32((4)):381–5. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Miall WE, Oldham PD. The hereditary factor in arterial blood-pressure. BMJ. 1963 Jan;1((5323)):75–80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5323.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Levy D, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Newton-Cheh C, Wang TJ, Hwang SJ, et al. Framingham Heart Study 100K Project: genome-wide associations for blood pressure and arterial stiffness. BMC Med Genet. 2007 Sep;8(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-S1-S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wellcome Trust Case Control C, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007 Jun;447((7145)):661–78. doi: 10.1038/nature05911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, Tobin MD, Bochud M, Coin L, et al. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009 Jun;41((6)):666–76. doi: 10.1038/ng.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Levy D, Ehret GB, Rice K, Verwoert GC, Launer LJ, Dehghan A, et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet. 2009 Jun;41((6)):677–87. doi: 10.1038/ng.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ehret GB, Munroe PB, Rice KM, Bochud M, Johnson AD, Chasman DI, et al. CHARGE-HF consortium Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011 Sep;478((7367)):103–9. doi: 10.1038/nature10405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wain LV, Verwoert GC, O'Reilly PF, Shi G, Johnson T, Johnson AD, et al. LifeLines Cohort Study. EchoGen consortium. AortaGen Consortium. CHARGE Consortium Heart Failure Working Group. KidneyGen consortium. CKDGen consortium. Cardiogenics consortium. CardioGram Genome-wide association study identifies six new loci influencing pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure. Nat Genet. 2011 Sep;43((10)):1005–11. doi: 10.1038/ng.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Warren HR, Evangelou E, Cabrera CP, Gao H, Ren M, Mifsud B, et al. International Consortium of Blood Pressure (ICBP) 1000G Analyses. BIOS Consortium. Lifelines Cohort Study. Understanding Society Scientific group. CHD Exome+ Consortium. ExomeBP Consortium. T2D-GENES Consortium. GoT2DGenes Consortium. Cohorts for Heart and Ageing Research in Genome Epidemiology (CHARGE) BP Exome Consortium. International Genomics of Blood Pressure (iGEN-BP) Consortium. UK Biobank CardioMetabolic Consortium BP working group Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. Nat Genet. 2017 Mar;49((3)):403–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kato N, Takeuchi F, Tabara Y, Kelly TN, Go MJ, Sim X, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants associated with blood pressure variation in east Asians. Nat Genet. 2011 Jun;43((6)):531–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lu X, Wang L, Lin X, Huang J, Charles Gu C, He M, et al. Genome-wide association study in Chinese identifies novel loci for blood pressure and hypertension. Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Feb;24((3)):865–74. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bush WS, Moore JH. Chapter 11: genome-wide association studies. PLOS Comput Biol. 2012;8((12)):e1002822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liang J, Le TH, Edwards DR, Tayo BO, Gaulton KJ, Smith JA, et al. Single-trait and multi-trait genome-wide association analyses identify novel loci for blood pressure in African-ancestry populations. PLoS Genet. 2017 May;13((5)):e1006728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, Edmondson AC, Stylianou IM, Koseki M, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010 Aug;466((7307)):707–13. doi: 10.1038/nature09270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS, Hengstenberg C, Mangino M, Mayer B, et al. WTCCC and the Cardiogenics Consortium Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug;357((5)):443–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, Stewart A, Roberts R, Cox DR, et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science. 2007 Jun;316((5830)):1488–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1142447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nikpay M, Goel A, Won HH, Hall LM, Willenborg C, Kanoni S, et al. A comprehensive 1,000 Genomes-based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47((10)):1121–30. doi: 10.1038/ng.3396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nelson CP, Goel A, Butterworth AS, Kanoni S, Webb TR, Marouli E, et al. EPIC-CVD Consortium. CARDIoGRAMplusC4D. UK Biobank CardioMetabolic Consortium CHD working group Association analyses based on false discovery rate implicate new loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2017 Sep;49((9)):1385–91. doi: 10.1038/ng.3913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marigorta UM, Navarro A. High trans-ethnic replicability of GWAS results implies common causal variants. PLoS Genet. 2013 Jun;9((6)):e1003566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McPherson R, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Genetics of Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Res. 2016 Feb;118((4)):564–78. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Consortium EP, ENCODE Project Consortium A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE) PLoS Biol. 2011 Apr;9((4)):e1001046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Oct;10((10)):669–80. doi: 10.1038/nrg2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Padmanabhan S, Melander O, Johnson T, Di Blasio AM, Lee WK, Gentilini D, et al. Global BPgen Consortium Genome-wide association study of blood pressure extremes identifies variant near UMOD associated with hypertension. PLoS Genet. 2010 Oct;6((10)):e1001177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trudu M, Janas S, Lanzani C, Debaix H, Schaeffer C, Ikehata M, et al. SKIPOGH team Common noncoding UMOD gene variants induce salt-sensitive hypertension and kidney damage by increasing uromodulin expression. Nat Med. 2013 Dec;19((12)):1655–60. doi: 10.1038/nm.3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takeshita T, Morimoto K, Mao XQ, Hashimoto T, Furuyama J. Phenotypic differences in low Km aldehyde dehydrogenase in Japanese workers. Lancet. 1993 Mar;341((8848)):837–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ripatti S, Tikkanen E, Orho-Melander M, Havulinna AS, Silander K, Sharma A, et al. A multilocus genetic risk score for coronary heart disease: case-control and prospective cohort analyses. Lancet. 2010 Oct;376((9750)):1393–400. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61267-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khera AV, Emdin CA, Drake I, Natarajan P, Bick AG, Cook NR, et al. Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375((24)):2349–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen HH, Almontashiri NA, Antoine D, Stewart AF. Functional genomics of the 9p21.3 locus for atherosclerosis: clarity or confusion? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Jul;16((7)):502. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0502-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harismendy O, Notani D, Song X, Rahim NG, Tanasa B, Heintzman N, et al. 9p21 DNA variants associated with coronary artery disease impair interferon-γ signalling response. Nature. 2011 Feb;470((7333)):264–8. doi: 10.1038/nature09753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Holdt LM, Hoffmann S, Sass K, Langenberger D, Scholz M, Krohn K, et al. Alu elements in ANRIL non-coding RNA at chromosome 9p21 modulate atherogenic cell functions through trans-regulation of gene networks. PLoS Genet. 2013;9((7)):e1003588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chan K, Patel RS, Newcombe P, Nelson CP, Qasim A, Epstein SE, et al. Association between the chromosome 9p21 locus and angiographic coronary artery disease burden: a collaborative meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar;61((9)):957–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Petersen CM, Nielsen MS, Nykjaer A, Jacobsen L, Tommerup N, Rasmussen HH, et al. Molecular identification of a novel candidate sorting receptor purified from human brain by receptor-associated protein affinity chromatography. J Biol Chem. 1997 Feb;272((6)):3599–605. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kathiresan S, Melander O, Guiducci C, Surti A, Burtt NP, Rieder MJ, et al. Six new loci associated with blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides in humans. Nat Genet. 2008 Feb;40((2)):189–97. doi: 10.1038/ng.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kjolby M, Andersen OM, Breiderhoff T, Fjorback AW, Pedersen KM, Madsen P, et al. Sort1, encoded by the cardiovascular risk locus 1p13.3, is a regulator of hepatic lipoprotein export. Cell Metab. 2010 Sep;12((3)):213–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Musunuru K, Strong A, Frank-Kamenetsky M, Lee NE, Ahfeldt T, Sachs KV, et al. From noncoding variant to phenotype via SORT1 at the 1p13 cholesterol locus. Nature. 2010 Aug;466((7307)):714–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Simino J, Sung YJ, Kume R, Schwander K, Rao DC. Gene-alcohol interactions identify several novel blood pressure loci including a promising locus near SLC16A9. Front Genet. 2013 Dec;4:277. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sung YJ, de Las Fuentes L, Schwander KL, Simino J, Rao DC. Gene-smoking interactions identify several novel blood pressure loci in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 2015 Mar;28((3)):343–54. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Slavin TP, Feng T, Schnell A, Zhu X, Elston RC. Two-marker association tests yield new disease associations for coronary artery disease and hypertension. Hum Genet. 2011 Dec;130((6)):725–33. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1009-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lu X, Peloso GM, Liu DJ, Wu Y, Zhang H, Zhou W, et al. GLGC Consortium Exome chip meta-analysis identifies novel loci and East Asian-specific coding variants that contribute to lipid levels and coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2017 Dec;49((12)):1722–30. doi: 10.1038/ng.3978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, Gretarsdottir S, Blondal T, Jonasdottir A, et al. A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science. 2007 Jun;316((5830)):1491–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1142842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Trégouët DA, König IR, Erdmann J, Munteanu A, Braund PS, Hall AS, et al. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Cardiogenics Consortium Genome-wide haplotype association study identifies the SLC22A3-LPAL2-LPA gene cluster as a risk locus for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2009 Mar;41((3)):283–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Erdmann J, Grosshennig A, Braund PS, König IR, Hengstenberg C, Hall AS, et al. Italian Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Working Group. Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Cardiogenics Consortium New susceptibility locus for coronary artery disease on chromosome 3q22.3. Nat Genet. 2009 Mar;41((3)):280–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Reilly MP, Li M, He J, Ferguson JF, Stylianou IM, Mehta NN, et al. Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium Identification of ADAMTS7 as a novel locus for coronary atherosclerosis and association of ABO with myocardial infarction in the presence of coronary atherosclerosis: two genome-wide association studies. Lancet. 2011 Jan;377((9763)):383–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61996-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Peden JF, Hopewell JC, Saleheen D, Chambers JC, Hager J, Soranzo N, et al. Coronary Artery Disease (C4D) Genetics Consortium A genome-wide association study in Europeans and South Asians identifies five new loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2011 Mar;43((4)):339–44. doi: 10.1038/ng.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schunkert H, König IR, Kathiresan S, Reilly MP, Assimes TL, Holm H, et al. Cardiogenics. CARDIoGRAM Consortium Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2011 Mar;43((4)):333–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lu X, Wang L, Chen S, He L, Yang X, Shi Y, et al. Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome-Wide Replication And Meta-Analysis (CARDIoGRAM) Consortium Genome-wide association study in Han Chinese identifies four new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2012 Jul;44((8)):890–4. doi: 10.1038/ng.2337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Smith NL, Felix JF, Morrison AC, Demissie S, Glazer NL, Loehr LR, et al. Association of genome-wide variation with the risk of incident heart failure in adults of European and African ancestry: a prospective meta-analysis from the cohorts for heart and aging research in genomic epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Jun;3((3)):256–66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.895763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Villard E, Perret C, Gary F, Proust C, Dilanian G, Hengstenberg C, et al. Cardiogenics Consortium A genome-wide association study identifies two loci associated with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2011 May;32((9)):1065–76. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gudbjartsson DF, Holm H, Gretarsdottir S, Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Thorgeirsson G, et al. A sequence variant in ZFHX3 on 16q22 associates with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Nat Genet. 2009 Aug;41((8)):876–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ellinor PT, Lunetta KL, Glazer NL, Pfeufer A, Alonso A, Chung MK, et al. Common variants in KCNN3 are associated with lone atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet. 2010 Mar;42((3)):240–4. doi: 10.1038/ng.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ellinor PT, Lunetta KL, Albert CM, Glazer NL, Ritchie MD, Smith AV, et al. Meta-analysis identifies six new susceptibility loci for atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet. 2012 Apr;44((6)):670–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Low SK, Takahashi A, Ebana Y, Ozaki K, Christophersen IE, Ellinor PT, et al. AFGen Consortium Identification of six new genetic loci associated with atrial fibrillation in the Japanese population. Nat Genet. 2017 Jun;49((6)):953–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.3842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pfeufer A, van Noord C, Marciante KD, Arking DE, Larson MG, Smith AV, et al. Genome-wide association study of PR interval. Nat Genet. 2010 Feb;42((2)):153–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chambers JC, Zhao J, Terracciano CM, Bezzina CR, Zhang W, Kaba R, et al. Genetic variation in SCN10A influences cardiac conduction. Nat Genet. 2010 Feb;42((2)):149–52. doi: 10.1038/ng.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sotoodehnia N, Isaacs A, de Bakker PI, Dörr M, Newton-Cheh C, Nolte IM, et al. Common variants in 22 loci are associated with QRS duration and cardiac ventricular conduction. Nat Genet. 2010 Dec;42((12)):1068–76. doi: 10.1038/ng.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Arking DE, Pfeufer A, Post W, Kao WH, Newton-Cheh C, Ikeda M, et al. A common genetic variant in the NOS1 regulator NOS1AP modulates cardiac repolarization. Nat Genet. 2006 Jun;38((6)):644–51. doi: 10.1038/ng1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Newton-Cheh C, Eijgelsheim M, Rice KM, de Bakker PI, Yin X, Estrada K, et al. Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study. Nat Genet. 2009 Apr;41((4)):399–406. doi: 10.1038/ng.364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Arking DE, Pulit SL, Crotti L, van der Harst P, Munroe PB, Koopmann TT, et al. CARe Consortium. COGENT Consortium. DCCT/EDIC. eMERGE Consortium. HRGEN Consortium Genetic association study of QT interval highlights role for calcium signaling pathways in myocardial repolarization. Nat Genet. 2014 Aug;46((8)):826–36. doi: 10.1038/ng.3014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.den Hoed M, Eijgelsheim M, Esko T, Brundel BJ, Peal DS, Evans DM, et al. CHARGE-AF Consortium Identification of heart rate-associated loci and their effects on cardiac conduction and rhythm disorders. Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45((6)):621–31. doi: 10.1038/ng.2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nolte IM, Munoz ML, Tragante V, Amare AT, Jansen R, Vaez A, et al. Genetic loci associated with heart rate variability and their effects on cardiac disease risk. Nat Commun. 2017 Jun;8:15805. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, Burtt NP, de Bakker PI, Chen H, et al. Diabetes Genetics Initiative of Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Lund University, and Novartis Institutes of BioMedical Research Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science. 2007 Jun;316((5829)):1331–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1142358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kooner JS, Chambers JC, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Hinds DA, Hyde CL, Warnes GR, et al. Genome-wide scan identifies variation in MLXIPL associated with plasma triglycerides. Nat Genet. 2008 Feb;40((2)):149–51. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sandhu MS, Waterworth DM, Debenham SL, Wheeler E, Papadakis K, Zhao JH, et al. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium LDL-cholesterol concentrations: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2008 Feb;371((9611)):483–91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60208-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kim YJ, Go MJ, Hu C, Hong CB, Kim YK, Lee JY, et al. MAGIC consortium Large-scale genome-wide association studies in East Asians identify new genetic loci influencing metabolic traits. Nat Genet. 2011 Sep;43((10)):990–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, Sengupta S, Peloso GM, Gustafsson S, Kanoni S, et al. Global Lipids Genetics Consortium Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2013 Nov;45((11)):1274–83. doi: 10.1038/ng.2797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ko A, Cantor RM, Weissglas-Volkov D, Nikkola E, Reddy PM, Sinsheimer JS, et al. Amerindian-specific regions under positive selection harbour new lipid variants in Latinos. Nat Commun. 2014 Jun;5((1)):3983. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Surakka I, Horikoshi M, Mägi R, Sarin AP, Mahajan A, Lagou V, et al. ENGAGE Consortium The impact of low-frequency and rare variants on lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2015 Jun;47((6)):589–97. doi: 10.1038/ng.3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wain LV, Vaez A, Jansen R, Joehanes R, van der Most PJ, Erzurumluoglu AM, et al. Novel Blood Pressure Locus and Gene Discovery Using Genome-Wide Association Study and Expression Data Sets From Blood and the Kidney. Hypertension. 2017 Jul;70((3)):HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09438. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nagy R, Boutin TS, Marten J, Huffman JE, Kerr SM, Campbell A, et al. Exploration of haplotype research consortium imputation for genome-wide association studies in 20,032 Generation Scotland participants. Genome Med. 2017 Mar;9((1)):23. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0414-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Parmar PG, Taal HR, Timpson NJ, Thiering E, Lehtimäki T, Marinelli M, et al. Early Genetics and Lifecourse Epidemiology Consortium International Genome-Wide Association Study Consortium Identifies Novel Loci Associated With Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Jun;9((3)):266–78. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kato N, Loh M, Takeuchi F, Verweij N, Wang X, Zhang W, et al. BIOS-consortium. CARDIo GRAMplusCD. LifeLines Cohort Study. InterAct Consortium Trans-ancestry genome-wide association study identifies 12 genetic loci influencing blood pressure and implicates a role for DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2015 Nov;47((11)):1282–93. doi: 10.1038/ng.3405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li C, Kim YK, Dorajoo R, Li H, Lee IT, Cheng CY, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Average Blood Pressure in East Asians. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017 Apr;10((2)):e001527. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu X, Hu C, Bao M, Li J, Liu X, Tan X, et al. Genome Wide Association Study Identifies L3MBTL4 as a Novel Susceptibility Gene for Hypertension. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug;6((1)):30811. doi: 10.1038/srep30811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Franceschini N, Fox E, Zhang Z, Edwards TL, Nalls MA, Sung YJ, et al. Asian Genetic Epidemiology Network Consortium Genome-wide association analysis of blood-pressure traits in African-ancestry individuals reveals common associated genes in African and non-African populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Sep;93((3)):545–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lettre G, Palmer CD, Young T, Ejebe KG, Allayee H, Benjamin EJ, et al. Genome-wide association study of coronary heart disease and its risk factors in 8,090 African Americans: the NHLBI CARe Project. PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb;7((2)):e1001300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.He L, Kernogitski Y, Kulminskaya I, Loika Y, Arbeev KG, Loiko E, et al. Pleiotropic Meta-Analyses of Longitudinal Studies Discover Novel Genetic Variants Associated with Age-Related Diseases. Front Genet. 2016 Oct;7:179. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hager J, Kamatani Y, Cazier JB, Youhanna S, Ghassibe-Sabbagh M, Platt DE, et al. FGENTCARD Consortium Genome-wide association study in a Lebanese cohort confirms PHACTR1 as a major determinant of coronary artery stenosis. PLoS One. 2012;7((6)):e38663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wakil SM, Ram R, Muiya NP, Mehta M, Andres E, Mazhar N, et al. A genome-wide association study reveals susceptibility loci for myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabs. Atherosclerosis. 2016 Feb;245:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lee JY, Lee BS, Shin DJ, Woo Park K, Shin YA, Joong Kim K, et al. A genome-wide association study of a coronary artery disease risk variant. J Hum Genet. 2013 Mar;58((3)):120–6. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2012.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Takeuchi F, Yokota M, Yamamoto K, Nakashima E, Katsuya T, Asano H, et al. Genome-wide association study of coronary artery disease in the Japanese. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Mar;20((3)):333–40. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pulse are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES