Watch a video presentation of this article
Watch the interview with the author
Abbreviations
- AAMC
American Association of Medical Colleges
- AASLD
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- ABIM
American Board of Internal Medicine
- HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV
hepatitis C virus
- NAFLD
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology has come a long way as a specialty of medicine. When the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) was founded in 1950 by a handful of like‐minded academics, hepatitis B had yet to be described, and the first liver transplant in humans was still 13 years away. The field has now blossomed into a fertile area for research and patient care; transplantation is now commonplace, viral hepatitis has been described and is increasingly eradicable, and the specialty has its own literature, training, and certification by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM). Despite these successes—and in part due to them—we face significant shortages in the workforce that cares for patients who have chronic liver diseases. Chronic viral hepatitis affects one out of 50 people in the general population, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis affects one out of every 20 to 30 individuals.1 The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2012 and other factors has led the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) to predict a shortage of more than 40,000 specialty physicians by 2020 (Table 1).2, 3 With only a thousand or so fully trained hepatologists and the influx of more insured patients in our communities, the shortage of hepatologists is likely to increase. With major changes in health care on the horizon, we must determine what skills hepatologists will need and what new challenges they will be facing.
Table 1.
Projected Supply and Demand of Full‐Time Equivalent Physicians Active in Patient Care After Health Care Reform in the United States (2010–2025)
| Year | Physician Supply (All Specialties) | Physician Demand (All Specialties) | Physician Shortage (Non‐Primary Care) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 709,700 | 723,400 | 4700 |
| 2015 | 735,600 | 798,500 | 33,100 |
| 2020 | 759,800 | 851,300 | 46,100 |
| 2025 | 785,400 | 916,000 | 64,800 |
Adapted from AAMC Center for Workforce Studies, June 2010 Analysis.
The coming decades will be characterized by a changing demographic of patients and disease processes as well as research priorities that fall under the purview of the hepatologic community. Hepatitis C (HCV) will be eclipsed in its long‐standing status as the leading cause of chronic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation in the United States.4, 5 Studies suggest that the availability of these new treatments will transform HCV into a rare disease by 2036.6 Although it is predicted that HCV‐related HCC will peak and then decline after 2020 based on past HCV treatment patterns, this diminution will not translate into a parallel decrease in overall HCC (Fig. 1).7, 8 Liver cancers are projected to surpass breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers to become the third leading causes of cancer‐related death by 2030.9 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), paralleling the increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the United States, is likely to emerge as the single most important cause of chronic liver disease, including HCC, over the next several decades.10, 11 The management of NAFLD will be a microcosm of the new paradigms of team practice, requiring the collaborative skills of hepatologists, cardiologists, dieticians, endocrinologists, surgeons, midlevel providers, and other health professionals.
Figure 1.

Incidence of liver cancer deaths. Time trends (1975–2010) of population‐based age‐adjusted incidence and mortality rates are shown for liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer in the United States. Both sexes and all races are included. Adapted with permission from Hepatology.7 Copyright 2014, Wiley.
With population growth and aging being the greatest drivers for increased health care utilization in the future, all physicians must focus on retooling to provide high‐quality care to patients with complex health needs.12 Hepatologists will be called on to provide leadership in determining allocation of resources due to their experience with costly antiviral pharmaceuticals and liver grafts. Issues in organ allocation have inspired hepatologists to work in multidisciplinary teams, treating critically ill patients in the setting of scarce medical resources.13 These experiences will provide us with further leadership opportunities in such burgeoning areas as universal access to health care, telemedicine, and interprofessional practice.
Liver transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure in the early 1980s to the most effective treatment for patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and eligible patients with HCC and fulminant hepatic failure. As we progress through the 21st century, the transplant hepatologist will play a crucial clinical role, with essential duties and skills to manage the complexities encountered in patients with acute and chronic liver disease. These skills will include interpretation of noninvasive liver imaging (eg, transient elastography, magnetic resonance elastography), pharmacogenomics, advanced methods for detection and treatment of portal hypertension, and pharmacotherapy for metabolic syndrome leading to NAFLD (Table 2). As these technologies develop, methods to gain competence in them will have to be incorporated into hepatology fellowship training in real‐time to allow for mastery of these skills and seamless application. It is hoped that these advancements will lead not only to increased life expectancy of patients with liver disease but also to increased quality of life.
Table 2.
Important Future Skills of a Hepatologist
| Disease State | Skills |
|---|---|
| Portal hypertension | • Noninvasive monitoring portal pressure |
| • Advanced endoscopic treatment for varices | |
| NAFLD | • Noninvasive methods to detect presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis |
| • Pharmacotherapy for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis | |
| • Pharmacotherapy for weight loss | |
| • Effective nutrition counselling | |
| • Determining genetic risk for progression | |
| Hepatic fibrosis | • Pharmacotherapy for reversal of fibrosis |
| HCC | • Chemopreventative therapies |
| • Early detection and risk identification | |
| • Molecular profiling for target‐directed therapies | |
| Drug‐induced liver injury | • Individualized pharmacogenomics and metabolomics |
| • Advanced methods of liver regeneration and adsorbent recirculating systems | |
| Alcoholic liver disease | • Effective treatments for alcoholic hepatitis |
| Transplantation | • Induction of operational tolerance |
| • Improved management and prevention of metabolic syndrome associated with immosuppressants |
The hepatologic research agenda for the coming decades promises to tackle improved treatment of HCC, reversal of hepatic fibrosis, eradication of hepatitis B, more effective treatments for autoimmune liver diseases, and induction of operational tolerance in transplant recipients. A needed increase in the hepatology workforce produced by different fellowship tracks will play a large role in providing these advances to patient (Table 3). Those hepatologists interested in academic medicine with a focus on basic or translational research may opt for the traditional pathway of an additional year of training following certification in gastroenterology. A 3‐year combined Gastroenterology/Transplant Hepatology fellowship track, cosponsored as a 10‐year pilot by the AASLD and the ABIM, has shown early success in applying competency‐based training and assessment, allowing a shorter training time for those fellows wishing to pursue a clinical career. The hepatology community will need to carefully monitor the progress of the 3‐year training pilot to insure the quality of trainees, the effect on workforce needs, and the potential influence on individuals who choose research‐intensive careers.
Table 3.
Training Models in Transplant Hepatology
| Four‐Year Program | Three‐Year Combined Gastroenterology/Transplant Hepatology Programa | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Training Area | Duration | Training Area | Duration |
| Gastroenterology | 13 months | Gastroenterology | 2 years |
| Hepatology | 5 months | Transplant Hepatology | 1 year |
| Research/Electives | 18 months | ||
| Transplant Hepatology | 1 year | ||
Still in pilot program phase.
In summary, the hepatology workforce of 2050 will undoubtedly possess an armamentarium capable of treating inflammatory, metabolic, and degenerative diseases of the liver, reversing hepatic fibrosis and managing the complications of advanced liver disease. Hepatology is likely to continue its evolution from the specialty of gastroenterology; board certification will continue to be required after gastroenterology training to ensure attainment of this specialized set of knowledge and skills. More difficult to predict is the direction of the health care delivery system, but it is safe to assume that multispecialty teams, development of chronic care models, and emphasis on value of services will be part of the equation. Ultimately, the future success of hepatology will be based on our ability to continue to sustain innovation in patient care, research, and education so as to improve both the quantity and quality of life for our patients.
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
References
- 1. Aragon D, Yousnossi ZM. When and how to evaluate mildly elevated liver enzymes in apparently healthy patients. Cleve Clin J Med 2010;77:195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Grover A. Now you have health care coverage—but who will treat you? https://www.aamc.org/advocacy/secondopinion/296560/070312.html. Accessed November 3, 2014.
- 3. Foster R. Estimated financial effects of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” as amended. https://www.cms.gov/ActuarialStudies/Downloads/PPACA_2010‐04‐22.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2014.
- 4. Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:705–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rosen HR. Clinical practice. Chronic hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2429–2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kabiri M, Jazwinski AB, Roberts MS, Schaefer AJ, Chhatwal J. The changing burden of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: model‐based predictions. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:170–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. El‐Serag HB, Kanwal F. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: Where are we? Where do we go? Hepatology 2014;60:1767–1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Davis GL, Alter MJ, El‐Serag H, Poynard T, Jennings LW. Aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression. Gastroenterology 2010;138:513–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913–2921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 2014;311:806–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, Watt KD, Heimbach JK, Dierkhising RA. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology 2011;141:1249–1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Institute of Medicine. Retooling for an aging America. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2008/Retooling‐for‐an‐Aging‐America‐Building‐the‐Health‐Care‐Workforce.aspx. Accessed November 3, 2014.
- 13. Neuberger J, Mulligan DC. Liver allocation—can we ever get it right and should we ever get it right? Hepatology 2015;61:28–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
