Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Neurology logoLink to Frontiers in Neurology
. 2019 Apr 24;10:315. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00315

REM-Sleep Behavior Disorder in Patients With Essential Tremor: What Is Its Clinical Significance?

Maria Salsone 1, Gennarina Arabia 2, Lucia Manfredini 2, Andrea Quattrone 2, Carmelina Chiriaco 1, Basilio Vescio 3, Miriam Sturniolo 2, Maurizio Morelli 2, Rita Nistico' 1, Fabiana Novellino 1, Antonio Gambardella 2, Aldo Quattrone 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC6491751  PMID: 31068885

Abstract

Objective: REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is an important risk factor for the dementia development and for the deterioration of autonomic functions in patients with Parkinson's Disease. RBD has also been reported in patients with Essential Tremor (ET). However, its clinical significance in ET remains still unknown. We aimed to investigate clinical, neuropsychological and cardiac autonomic scintigraphic differences between ET patients with and without RBD.

Methods: To assess RBD symptoms, RBD Single-Question has been administered in a cohort of 55 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ET. Patients with clinical RBD underwent polysomnography (PSG) confirmation. All patients completed a battery of neuropsychological assessment of memory, executive function, attention, language, and visuospatial function. Cardiac MIBG scintigraphy was performed in order to measure the cardiac autonomic innervation.

Results: Ten ET patients (18%) had a PSG-confirmed RBD (ETRBD+). Compared to ET patients without RBD (ETRBD−), significantly reduced scores on memory domain tests such as Rey auditory verbal learning test immediate recall (p = 0.015) and Rey auditory verbal learning test delayed recall (p = 0.004) and phonemic fluency test (p = 0.028) were present in ETRBD+. By contrast, no other significant clinical difference has emerged from the comparison between two ET groups. Similarly, ETRBD+ patients have cardiac MIBG tracer uptake in the normal value range as occurred in those with ETRBD−.

Conclusions: This study improves the knowledge on clinical significance of RBD symptoms in ET patients. Our preliminary findings demonstrate that presence of RBD in ET is associated with neurocognitive impairment, but not with cardiac autonomic dysfunction. Further longitudinal studies are needed to investigate whether ET patients with RBD will develop a frank dementia over the time.

Keywords: essential tremor, REM sleep behavior disorder, cognitive impairment, cardiac MIBG scintigraphy, DAT-SPECT imaging

Introduction

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disease among adults. Traditionally, it is defined by a core of clinical motor symptoms characterized by kinetic/postural tremor affecting hand, head, or other parts of the body without other clinical signs of parkinsonism (1). ET, however, is a phenotypically heterogeneous disease including both motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS). In recent years, a growing body of literature has been focused on the prevalence of some of the NMS in ET, such as cognitive impairment, depression, olfactory deficits and sleep disturbances as REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) (2). Among the NMS, depression and RBD are reported to have higher prevalence in ET patients than in the general population (3).

Interestingly, the NMS especially RBD, found in patients with ET are known to be prodromal conversion symptoms of α-Synuclepathaties such as Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, the presence of RBD in PD patients identifies a specific clinical subtype of the disease. Indeed, in PD, RBD is associated with older age, longer disease duration (4), rigid-akinetic form of PD and more severe parkinsonian symptoms (5). These patients may also have increased autonomic dysfunction and higher risk to develop dementia and therefore worse prognosis (6). Moreover, in PD-RBD patients, cardiac Meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) uptake, a measure of cardiac autonomic innervation was lower compared to that observed in PD patients without RBD (7).

As occurs in PD, the presence of RBD in ET could identify a specific clinical phenotype. However, the literature regarding the clinical, neuropsychological and scintigraphic features in ET patients associated with RBD is poor or absent. Indeed, only a study (8) has assessed the difference regarding demographics tremor characteristics, and prevalence of autonomic symptoms between ET patients with and without RBD. These authors found that ET patients with RBD had higher scores on Scales for outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Autonomic Questionnaire (SCOPA-AUT) than those without RBD suggesting that RBD in ET is associated with dysautonomic symptoms. Few reports have investigated cardiac MIBG uptake in patients with ET (9, 10) a no evidence has been reported in ET patients associated with RBD. Finally, no study has previously evaluated neurocognitive performance in ET patients associated RBD.

Thus, several questions regarding the clinical significance of RBD in ET patients are still answered.

Considering that RBD is an important risk factor for the dementia development and for the deterioration of autonomic functions, we aimed to investigate clinical, neuropsychological, and cardiac autonomic scintigraphic differences between ET patients with and without RBD.

Methods

Study Population

This cross sectional study included 55 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of ET made by a movement disorders specialist (MS) according to established criteria (11). Each patient underwent an accurate clinical history and a neurological evaluation. Fahn-Tolosa was used for clinical evaluation of ET patients. We assess the presence of clinical symptoms suggestive of REM-sleep behavior disorder (RBD) by using of RBD Single-Question (RBD1Q), a single “yes-no” question querying the classic dream-enactment behavior of RBD (12). According to RBD1Q results, we divided the ET patients into two groups, ET with RBD (ETRBD+) and ET without RBD (ETRBD−). ETRBD+ underwent polysomnographic (PSG) recording. Patients were diagnosed with RBD using polysomnography according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, version 3 (ICSD-3) criteria (13). The following cognitive functions were assessed in all enrolled ET patients: (i) global cognitive status (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE](14); ii) executive functions (Frontal Assessment Battery [FAB] (15), Modified Card Sorting Test [MCST] (16); iii) attention (Digit Span Forward) (17); (iv) verbal short and long term memory, episodic memory (Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test Immediate [RAVLT-I] and Delayed [RAVLT-D] (18); v) visuo-spatial functions (Judgments of Line Orientation test form V [JLO-V])(19); (vi) phonemic verbal fluency (Controlled Oral Word Association Test [COWAT] (20); vii) language comprehension [Token Test] (21); (viii) anxiety and depression [Hamilton Rating Scale Anxiety [HRS-A] (22) and Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI-II] (23), respectively]. Before inclusion in the study, written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was approved by the institutional review board according to the Helsinki Declaration.

Imaging Protocol

Imaging protocol included brain MRI, DAT-SPECT, and cardiac MIBG scintigaphy. Participants underwent MRI on a 3T GE system (GE Healthcare, Rahway, NJ). The MRI protocol included: 3-dimensional T1-weighted volumetric spoiled gradient echo (GE), T2-weighted fast spin echo, and T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences. In all ET patients (with and without RBD) we performed DAT-SPECT (24) to support the clinical diagnosis of ET and Cardiac MIBG scintigraphy to measure the cardiac autonomic innervation thus investigating cardiac autonomic function (24).

Cardiac MIBG Scintigraphy

Cardiac MIBG scintigraphy was performed at rest. A total of 111 MBq of I-MIBG (Amersham, Eindhoven, NL) was injected intravenously in 60 s. Data were collected using a dual-head gamma camera (Axis, Picker, Bedford, OH) at 10 min (early image) and 240 min (delayed image) after the isotope injection. Static planar imaging and regional MIBG uptake were obtained with 128 matrix. Only planar images in thoracic anterior view were used for quantitative evaluation. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn around the whole heart and mediastinum of the anterior image, and tracer uptake was measured within each ROI to calculate the heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio.

The H/M ratio from early and delayed images was evaluated in all subjects, and values were considered abnormal if they were more than three standard deviations (SDs) below the respective control mean. Regional MIBG uptake was assessed using single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) on the three axes displayed (short axis, vertical long axis, and horizontal long axis). Images were evaluated by an investigator who was blinded to the patients' diagnosis (24).

Statistical Analysis

Differences in distribution of sex, familiarity, and clinical features between ETRBD+ and ETRBD− groups were assessed by means of the Fisher's exact test. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check for normality before performing comparisons between continuous variables. When comparing ETRBD+ and ETRBD− groups, the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to assess differences in age at evaluation, education, disease duration, age at ET onset, Fahn-Tolosa score, part A and part B of Fahn-Tolosa scale, MMSE, MCST, JLO-V, Digit Span scores, HRS-A and BDI-II, while DAT-SPECT, MIBG, Token test, RAVLT I.R., RAVLT D.R., FAB, and phonemic fluency test scores were compared by means of Student's t-test. In order to control for false discovery rate, Benjamini–Hochberg correction was applied to p-values when comparing neuropsychological variables. All tests were two-tailed and the α level was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with R Statistical Software (R for Unix/Linux, version 3.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014).

Results

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

According to RBD1Q results, 10 ET patients (18%) were positive (ETRBD+) whereas 45 were negative (ETRBD−). All ETRBD+ patients received a PSG-confirmation of clinical suspicion of RBD. Sleep and dream-related behaviors reported by the history and documented during video PSG were present in our ETRBD+ patients and included violent complex motor behaviors both disruptive (60%) to the bed partner (punching, kicking etc.) and injurious (40%) (biting an arm, leaping from the bed etc.). Indeed, ETRBD+ patients showed clear abnormal REM sleep behaviors during PSG recording. Interestingly, in three patients with ETRBD+, RBD preceded the onset of motor symptoms by several years while in 1 patient was contemporary. Demographic and clinical characteristics of all participants are summarized in Table 1. Patients groups were not statistically different regarding sex, onset, family history, disease duration, and severity of disease. Patients with ETRBD+ had a slight higher prevalence of head tremor, kinetic tremor, and lower of asymmetrical postural tremor than those with ETRBD−. NMS such as hyposmia and constipation did not show significant difference between two groups (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparisons among demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data of patients affected by ET, ETRBD+, and ETRBD−.

Variables All ET group (N = 55) ETRBD+ (N = 10) ETRBD– (N = 45) p-value
DEMOGRAPHICS
Sex: No. men/women 25/30 7/3 21/24 0.75a
Age, years (mean ± SD) 65.0 ± 10.1 62.9 ± 12.2 65.5 ± 9.6 0.52b
Education, years (mean ± SD) 9.4 ± 4.5 10.8 ± 2.5 9.1 ± 4.8 0.12b
FAMILY HISTORY
Postural/kinetic tremor, n. (%) 30 (54.5) 5 (50) 25 (56.8) 0.74a
DISEASE FEATURES
Disease duration, years (mean ± SD) 13.9 ± 14.3 10.1 ± 9.2 14.7 ± 15.7 1b
Age at onset of ET, years (mean ± SD) 51.5 ± 16.3 52.7 ± 13.3 51.3 ± 17.0 0.99b
Head tremor, n. (%) 27 (45.4) 6 (60) 19 (42.2) 0.48a
Kinetic tremor, n. (%) 41 (74.5) 9 (90) 32 (71.1) 0.1a
Asymmetric postural tremor, n. (%) 31 (53.5) 4 (40) 26 (57.8) 0.34a
Fahn-Tolosa score (mean ± SD) 22.3 ± 12.9 17.7 ± 7.1 23.8 ± 14.3 0.11c
Part A of Fahn-Tolosa scale (mean ± SD) 7.3 ± 3.1 6.7 ± 2.3 7.5 ± 3.4 0.72b
Postural tremor, n. (%) 55 (100) 10 (100) 45 (100) 1a
Part B of Fahn-Tolosa scale (mean ± SD) 9.4 ± 7.3 8.0 ± 5.2 10.0 ± 8.1 0.39c
Hyposmia/Anosmia, n. (%) 4 (7.2) 1 (10) 3 (6.6) 1a
Constipation, n. (%) 10 (18.1) 1 (10) 9 (22.5) 0.71a
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL BATTERY
MMSE mean ± SD (range) 25.7 ± 3.7 26.3 ± 2.5 25.6 ± 3.9 0.78b
Token test mean ± SD (range) 30.1 ± 2.5 29.4 ± 2.2 30.2 ± 2.6 0.46c
RAVLT I.R. mean ± SD (range) 36.2 ± 10.4 29.0 ± 6.6 37.7 ± 10.5 0.015c
RAVLT D.R. mean ± SD (range) 6.9 ± 2.8 4.2 ± 2.0 7.4 ± 2.6 0.004c
MCST mean ± SD (range) 4.7 ± 2.2 4.7 ± 2.3 4.7 ± 2.3 0.93b
FAB (mean ± SD) 14.1 ± 1.8 13.7 ± 1.2 14.1 ± 1.9 0.55c
JLO-V (mean ± SD) 22.2 ± 5.5 21.5 ± 5.6 22.4 ± 5.6 0.76b
Digit Span (mean ± SD) 5.3 ± 3.2 4.6 ± 0.2 5.4 ± 3.4 0.50b
COWAT (mean ± SD) 24.0 ± 5.9 20.3 ± 3.8 24.7 ± 6.0 0.028c
HRS-A (mean ± SD) 10.8 ± 4.5 11.2 ± 4.8 10.6 ± 4.6 0.95b
BDI-II (mean ± SD) 11.9 ± 5.9 12.6 ± 6.0 11.6 ± 6.1 0.77b
Open in a new tab

ETRBD+ group, Essential tremor (ET) patients with Rem sleep behavior disorder (RBD); ETRBD−, ET patients without RBD;

MMSE, Mini Mental State Evaluation (n.v. ≥ 24); Range, ETRBD+ group, (25–29); ETRBD− group, (25–30);

Token test (n.v. ≥ 26.25); Range, ETRBD+ group, (27–31); ETRBD− group, (27.75–34);

RAVLT R.I., Rey auditory verbal learning test immediate recall (n.v. ≥ 28.53); Range, ETRBD+ group, (21.8–33.2); ETRBD− group, (29–67.3);

RAVLT R.D., Rey auditory verbal learning test delayed recall (n.v. ≥ 4.69); Range, ETRBD+ group, (1.6–6.9); ETRBD− group, (5–11.8);

MCST, Modified card sorting test (n.v. ≥ 3); Range, ETRBD+ group, (3–6); ETRBD− group, (3–6);

FAB, frontal assessment battery (n.v. ≥ 13.4); Range, ETRBD+ group, (12.2–14.4); ETRBD− group, (12.9–18);

JLO-V, Judgment of Line Orientation-Form V (n.v. ≥ 20); Range, ETRBD+ group, (21–26); ETRBD− group, (21–27);

Digit span (n.v. ≥ 3.5); Range, ETRBD+ group, (4.25–4.75); ETRBD− group, (3.75–6.25);

COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test (n.v: ≥ 17.35); Range, ETRBD+ group, (17.3–25.5); ETRBD− group, (17.9–38.2);

HRS-A, Hamilton Rating Scale Anxiety (n.v. > 14); Range, ETRBD+ group, (8–14); ETRBD− group, (9–18);

BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory II (n.v: > 13); Range, ETRBD+ group, (8–18); ETRBD− group, (8–19);

n.v., normal values in Italian Population.

a

Fisher's exact test.

b

Mann–Whitney U-test (Wilcoxon rank sum test).

c

Two-sample t-test. P-values are calculated ETRBD+ group vs. ETRBD− group.

Multiple comparison tests: RAVLT D.R p = 0.038; RAVLT R I.R., p = 0.068; COWAT, p = 0.084.

Neurological Test Scores

The neurological test scores and results of analyses are presented in Table 1. Neuropsychological assessment revealed that ETRBD+ had significant lower scores concerning verbal short and long term memory tests such as RAVLT I.R. (p = 0.015) and RAVLT D.R. (p = 0.004) and phonemic verbal fluency as COWAT (p = 0.028) than ETRBD−. Moreover, RAVLT D.R results resist multiple comparisons (p = 0.038) with a trend for RAVLT I.R. (p = 0.068) and COWAT (p = 0.084). Of note, although ETRBD+ patients had slightly higher MMSE scores than ETRBD− patients, they showed overall cognitive performances lower for FAB, MCST, JLO-V, and Token Test compared to those of patients with ETRBD−. Finally, concerning anxiety and depression, ETRBD+ patients did not significant differ from those with ETRBD− (Table 1).

Imaging Results

MRI scan indicated no signal abnormalities in any ET patient. Table 2 shows the comparisons among scintigraphic data of patients affected by ETRBD+ and ETRBD−. No ET patient had a damage of nigrostriatal presynaptic dopaminergic system on DAT-SPECT imaging thus supporting the clinical diagnosis of ET in both groups. In addition, DAT-SPECT tracer uptake did not differ in qualitative and quantitative (Putamen/Occ ratio) analyses between two groups (Table 2). Similarly, cardiac MIBG uptake (Heart/Mediastinum ratio) both early and delayed images, showed no difference between the two groups (Table 2). Finally, DAT-SPECT and cardiac MIBG uptakes were both within the normal range values in the two groups of ET (Table 2). Figure 1 shows the qualitative images of DAT-SPECT and cardiac MIBG tracers in a patient with ETRBD+ (Figures 1A,B) and in patient with ETRBD−(Figures 1C,D).

Table 2.

Comparisons among scintigraphic data of patients affected by ET, ETRBD+, and ETRBD−.

Variables All ET group (N = 55) ETRBD+ group (N = 10) ET RBD– group (N = 45) p-valuea
DAT-SPECT IMAGING*
Putamen R/Occ ratio 4.41 ± 0.61 4.64 ± 0.45 4.36 ± 0.6 0.12a
Putamen L/Occ ratio 4.38 ± 0.62 4.62 ± 0.60 4.34 ± 0.61 0.20a
CARDIAC MIBG SCINTIGRAPHY**
Heart/Mediastinum ratio early image 1.72 ± 0.25 1.81 ± 0.3 1.70 ± 0.24 0.28a
Heart/Mediastinum ratio delayed image 1.73 ± 0.28 1.84 ± 0.33 1.69 ± 0.25 0.21a
Open in a new tab

ETRBD+ group, Essential tremor (ET) patients with Rem sleep behavior disorder (RBD); ETRBD−, ET patients without RBD; DAT-SPECT, Dopamine transporter ligand (DAT)-Single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT); Putamen/Occ ratio [Putamen specific (Left/Right) to non-specific (occipital) area]; MIBG, Cardiac I-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy;

*

Normal values: Put/Cau right (mean ± SD, 4.29 ± 0.34) and Put/Cau left (mean ± SD, 4.19 ± 0.39).

**

Normal values: Heart/Mediastinum ratio: mean ± SD, 1.94 ± 0.18 early; 2.02 ± 0.19 delayed.

a

Two-sample t-test. P-values are calculated ETRBD+ group vs. ETRBD− group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

DAT-SPECT imaging and cardiac MIBG scintigraphy in a patient with ET RBD+ (A,B) and in a patient with ETRBD− (C,D). The images show in both patients a normal uptake of the tracers.

Discussion

Our goal was to investigate for the first time clinical, neuropsychological, and scintigraphic differences between ET patients with and without RBD. In particular, we found that neurocognitive function, including verbal short and delayed memory and phonemic verbal fluency, was worse in ET patients with RBD than in those without RBD. By contrast, no significant clinical and scintigraphic difference emerged between the two ET groups. Our preliminary findings suggest that ET patients with RBD could be a subgroup of ET at higher risk to develop a frank dementia over the time.

The presence of RBD in ET patients raises some clinical questions. First, RBD and dementia development. Accumulating evidence suggest that RBD is an important determinant of cognitive impairment in patients with α-Synucleinopathies as Parkinson's Disease (PD). Most studies have reported that the prevalence of MCI was significantly higher (until 70%) in PD with RBD than in those without RBD (25). A longitudinal study (26) also found that all PD-RBD with MCI on baseline (48%) developed a frank dementia on 4 years' follow-up evaluation thus suggesting that RBD may be a valid phenoconversion biomarker of dementia.

In our study we questioned whether in ET patients, as occurs in those with PD, RBD could be associated with neurocognitive dysfunctions. We found that all ET patients with PSG-confirmed RBD (18%) (ETRBD+) had worse cognitive abilities than those of ET patients without RBD (ETRBD−). In particular, although ETRBD+ patients had slightly higher MMSE scores, they showed overall executive and visuospatial functions, attention and language comprehension worse than those with ETRBD−. Of note, compared to ETRBD− significantly lower performances on RAVLT I.R. (Immediate) and RAVLT D.R. (Delayed) were present in ETRBD+. The RAVLT is a powerful neuropsychological tool widely used for the cognitive assessment in dementia and pre-dementia conditions. It is sensitive to verbal memory deficits caused by several neurological diseases (27, 28). Different scores may be derived from RAVLT, but RAVLT Immediate and Delayed are the most used scores in the clinical setting since they highlight different aspects of episodic memory (learning and delayed memory, respectively). Thus, RAVLT is considered an effective marker for discriminating normally aging subjects from MCI and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients (29). Decreased RAVLT performance found in our ETRBD+ could reflect a deficit verbal episodic memory. Of note, in our study RAVLT Delayed resisted multiple comparisons thus suggesting that our results are solid. Interestingly, we also found a significantly lower performance on COWAT in ETRBD+ compared to ETRBD−. The COWAT allows to evaluate phonemic verbal fluency thus investigating both language and executive function domains. Recent evidence (30) has demonstrated that a decreased COWAT performance is a strong predictor of conversion from normal cognition to preclinical AD. Thus, the decreased score on COWAT found in our ETRBD+ could be suggestive of initial mild cognitive impairment. Moreover, we are in agreement with previous evidences (31) reporting that in RBD symptoms usually correlate with specific cognitive domains including verbal memory and executive functions. Supporting this hypothesis, some authors (32) also found that PD-RBD patients performed worse than PD-nRBD in attention, executive functions, verbal learning and memory RAVLT I.R. and RAVLT D.R., thus suggesting that the presence of RBD in their PD patients was associated with increases the risk of a MCI diagnosis. Taken together our evidences, although preliminary, suggest that RBD in ET could be associated with cognitive impairment.

Cognitive impairment and dementia, however, are not surprising in ET. A series of neuropsychological investigations (33–36) have well-documented that ET may exhibit a clinical spectrum of mild cognitive deficits including attention, executive function, memory, and naming. Indeed, has been reported that ET patients have an increased risk for developing both amnestic and non-amnestic MCI (37). Neurocognitive deficits in ET, are usually deficits in specific aspects of neurocognitive functioning particularly those thought to rely on the integrity of the prefrontal cortex suggesting an involvement of fronto-cerebellar circuits (33, 34). Moreover, epidemiological evidences have demonstrated ET patients have greater risk of developing dementia and at a faster rate of progression than in normal elders thus suggesting that this could be not a simple age-related consequence (38–42). It remains still unknown, however, whether ET patients exhibiting cognitive impairment had or not RBD symptoms. In our study, only ET patients with RBD showed cognitive impairment with scores on Immediate, Delayed RAVLT and COWAT similar to those observed in ET patients with cognitive impairment (34). Thus, we can speculate that ET patients with cognitive impairment reported in the latter cited studies, could have clinical or subclinical RBD symptoms.

The second question regarding the presence of RBD in ET is the association with dysautonomic symptoms and the development of α-Synucleinopathies as PD. Some authors (8) reported that ET with RBD had higher prevalence of dysautonomic symptoms compared to those without RBD. As these symptoms are known to be PD prodromal symptoms, they suggest that ET-RBD may be a subgroup of ET at higher risk for PD progression (8). The biological support for this notion could consist in neuropathological investigations revealing the presence of Lewy bodies in some ET brains defining a “Lewy bodies ET subtype” (43). On the other hand, it is well-documented that in idiopathic RBD (iRBD) patients, the initial α-synuclein aggregation targets the nerve terminals of the peripheral autonomic nervous system (44). Thus, we investigated in all ET patients (with and without RBD) the integrity of cardiac autonomic system using cardiac MIBG scintigraphy, a tool able to measure the cardiac autonomic innervation. Indeed, cardiac MIBG scintigraphy has been recently proposed to be a useful predictor of RBD phenoconversion. When iRBD converts vs. Lewy bodies disease as PD, it is characterized by cardiac sympathetic denervation whereas it converts vs. multiple system atrophy, cardiac sympathetic innervation is preserved (44). Only two studies (9, 10) have previously investigated cardiac autonomic innervation in ET. Both studies, found that in ET cardiac sympathetic innervation was preserved unlike to occur in PD. We are in agreement with these evidences since in ETRBD+ cardiac MIBG uptake was in the normal value range as occurred in ETRBD−. This finding is strongly indicative of preserved cardiac sympathetic innervation and suggest that in our ET cohort, the presence of RBD was not associated with cardiac sympathetic system damage. In addition, there was any clinical significant difference between ET patients with and without RBD concerning, demographics, tremor characteristics (kinetic, postural tremors etc.) and prevalence of other NMS such as constipation and hyposmia. Considering the lack of clinical and imaging differences between ET patients with and without RBD, we suggest that ET patients with RBD could be a subgroup belong to ET syndrome rather than a subgroup higher risk for PD progression. This assertion needs confirmation in future studies.

Our study has some limitations. The most significant is the lack of neuropathological investigation thus we cannot exclude that ETRBD+ have Lewy bodies in the brains. Cardiac MIBG scintigraphy, however, is considered a valid tool to investigate the cardiac sympathetic system, a system usually damaged in patients with Lewy bodies disease as PD. Second, the two subgroups of ET patients have different sample sizes, probably caused by the prevalence of RBD in ET. However, in our study we found statistical significant differences between two groups resisting multiple comparison (RAVLT D.R.) thus suggesting that discrepancy does not affect the obtained results. Third, we used RBD1Q to investigate clinical symptoms of RBD and to screen the subjects to send to PSG confirmation. This questionnaire is widely used in clinical setting having a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 87.2% for identifying subjects with RBD clinical suspicion. Finally, the lack of a follow up period of evaluation. Further longitudinal studies in a wider cohort of ET patients with RBD are needed to investigate whether these patients will develop a frank dementia over the time.

Despite to these limitations, our preliminary results are important to better characterize the clinical phenotype ET-RBD. Reduced performances on verbal short and delayed memory and phonemic verbal fluency test reported in patients with RBD, but not in those without RBD, suggest that ET patients with RBD may be subgroup at higher risk to developing dementia.

Author Contributions

MaS contributed to the design of the study, drafting and revising the manuscript, analysis, acquisition, and interpretation of the data. GA, MM, RN, FN, and AG contributed to the analysis and the interpretation of the data. LM and AnQ contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data. BV contributed to statistical analysis of the data. AlQ contributed in the study concept/design, critical supervision of the article, and approved the final version of the manuscript. CC contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the neuropsycological data. MiS contributed to the acquisition of the PSG data.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank all our patients and their families for collaboration.

References

  • 1.Louis ED. Essential tremor. Lancet Neurol. (2005) 4:100–10. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)00991-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Louis ED. Non-motor symptoms in essential tremor: a review of the current data and state of the field. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2016) 22:S115–8. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.08.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lacerte A, Chouinard S, Jodoin N, Bernard G, Rouleau G, Panisset M. Increased prevalence of non-motor symptoms in essential tremor. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. (2014) 4:162. 10.7916/D82V2D91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iranzo A, Santamaria J, Tolosa E. The clinical and pathophysiological relevance of REM sleep behaviour disorder in neurodegenerative diseases. Sleep Med Rev. (2009) 13:385–01. 10.1016/j.smrv.2008.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nomura T, Inoue Y, Kagimura T, Nakashima K. Clinical significance of REM sleep behaviour disorder in Parkinson's disease. Sleep Med. (2013) 14:131–5. 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Montplaisir JY. REM sleep behaviour disorder: from dreams to neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. (2012) 46:553–8. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miyamoto T, Miyamoto M, Iwanami M, Hirata K. Cardiac 123I-MIBG accumulation in Parkinson's disease differs in association with REM sleep behavior disorder. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2011) 219–20. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Borbosa R, Mendonca M, Ladeira F, Miguel R, Bugalho P. Probable REM-sleep behavior disorder and dysautonomic symptoms in essential tremor. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. (2017) 7:522 10.7916/D8Z61VW5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Novellino F, Arabia G, Bagnato A, Cascini GL, Salsone M, Nicoletti G, et al. Combined use of DAT-SPECT and cardiac MIBG scintigraphy in mixed tremors. Mov Disord. (2009) 24:2242–38. 10.1002/mds.22771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee PH, Kim JW, Bang OY, Joo IS, Yoom SN, Huh K. Cardiac 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in patients with essential tremor. Mov Disord. (2006) 21:1235–38. 10.1002/mds.20908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M. Consensus statement of the movement disorder society on tremor: ad hoc scientific committee. Mov Disord. (1998) 13:2–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Postuma RB, Arnulf I, Hogl B, Iranzo A, Miyamoto T, Dauvilliers Y, et al. , A single- question screen for rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a multicenter validation study. Mov Disord. (2012) 27:913–6. 10.1002/mds.25037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iranzo A, Aparicio J. A lesson from anatomy: focal brain lesions causing REM sleep behaviour disorder. Sleep Med. (2009) 10:9–12. 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini Mental State”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. (1975) 12:189–98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Appollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, Piamarta F, Consoli T, Villa ML, et al. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. (2005) 26:108–16. 10.1007/s10072-005-0443-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F. Modified Card Sorting Test: normative data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2004) 26:246–50. 10.1076/jcen.26.2.246.28087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation; (1981). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G. The mental deterioration battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The Group for the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. Eur Neurol. (1996) 36:378–84. 10.1159/000117297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Benton AL, Varney NR, Hamsher KD. Visuospatial judgment. A clinical test. Arch Neurol. (1978) 35:364–67. 10.1001/archneur.1978.00500300038006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benton AL, Hamsher KD, Rey GJ. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates; (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Token test in Italian standardization and classification of Neuropsychological tests The Italian Group on the Neuropsychological Study of Aging. Ital J Neurol Sci. (1987) 8:120–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. (1959) 32:50–5. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Beck AT, Steer R. Depression Inventory Scoring Manual. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation; (1987). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Salsone M, Bagnato A, Novellino F, Cascini GL, Paglionico S, Cipullo S, et al. Cardiac MIBG scintigraphy in Primary Progressive Freezing Gait. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2009) 15:365–9. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gagnon JF, Vendette M, Postuma RB, Desjardins C, Massicotte-Marquez J, Panisset M, et al. , Mild cognitive impairment in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. (2009) 66:39–47. 10.1002/ana.21680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Postuma RB, Bertrand JA, Montplaisir J, Desjardins C, Vendette M, Rios Romenets S, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and risk of dementia in Parkinson's disease: a prospective study. Mov Disord. (2012) 27:720–6. 10.1002/mds.24939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schoenberg MR, Dawson KA, Duff K, Patton D, Scott JG, Adams RL. Test performance and classification statistics for the Rey auditory verbal learning test in selected clinical samples. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. (2006) 21:693–703. 10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Estévez-González A, Kulisevsky J, Boltes A, Otermin P, García-Sánchez C. Rey verbal learning test is a useful tool for differential diagnosis in the preclinical phase of Alzheimer's disease: comparison with mild cognitive impairment and normal aging. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2003) 18:1021–8. 10.1002/gps.1010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Balthazar ML, Yasuda CL, Cendes F, Damasceno BP. Learning, retrieval, and recognition are compromised in a MCI and mild AD: are distinct episodic memory processes mediated by the same anatomical structures? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2010) 16:205–9. 10.1017/S1355617709990956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Blacker D, Lee H, Muzikansky A, Martin EC, Tanzi R, McArdle JJ, et al. Neuropsychological measures in normal individuals that predict subsequent cognitive decline. Arch Neurol. (2007) 64:862–71. 10.1001/archneur.64.6.862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang JR, Chen J, Yang ZJ, Zhang HJ, Fu YT, Shen Y, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder symptoms correlate with domains of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Chin Med J (Engl). (2016) 129:379–85. 10.4103/0366-6999.176077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jozwiak N, Postuma RB, Montplaisir J, Latreille V, Panisset M, Chouinard S, et al. REM sleep behavior disorder and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Sleep. (2017) 40:1–10. 10.1093/sleep/zsx101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lombardi WJ, Woolston DJ, Roberts JW, Gross RE. Cognitive deficits in patients with essential tremor. Neurology. (2001) 57:785–90. 10.1212/WNL.57.5.785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Puertas-Martín V, Villarejo-Galende A, Fernández-Guinea S, Romero JP, Louis ED, Benito-León J. A comparison study of cognitive and neuropsychiatric features of Essential Tremor and Parkinson's Disease. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. (2016) 6:431. 10.7916/D86H4HRN [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim JS, Song IU, Shim YS, Park JW, Yoo JY, Kim YI, et al. Cognitive impairment in essential tremor without dementia. J Clin Neurol. (2009) 5:81–4. 10.3988/jcn.2009.5.2.81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Higginson CI, Wheelock VL, Levine D, King DS, Pappas CT, Sigvardt KA. Cognitive deficits in essential tremor consistent with frontosubcortical dysfunction. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2008) 30:760–5. 10.1080/13803390701754738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cersonsky TEK, Morgan S, Kellner S, Robakis D, Liu X, Huey ED, et al. Evaluating mild cognitive impairment in essential tremor: how many and which neuropsychological tests? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2018) 24:1084–98. 10.1017/S1355617718000747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bermejo-Pareja F, Louis ED, Benito-Leon J. Risk of incident dementia in essential tremor: a population- based study. Mov Disord. (2007) 22:1573–80. 10.1002/mds.21553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Thawani SP, Schupf N, Louis ED. Essential tremor is associated with dementia: prospective population- based study in New York. Neurology. (2009) 73:621–5. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b389f1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Louis ED. Essential tremor: evolving clinicopathological concepts in an era of intensive post-mortem enquiry. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9:613–22. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70090-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Benito-León J, Louis ED, Mitchell AJ, Bermejo-Pareja F. Elderly-onset essential tremor and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study (NEDICES). J Alzheimer's Dis. (2011) 23:727–35. 10.3233/JAD-2011-101572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Benito-León J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F. Neurological Disorders in Central Spain Study G. Elderly-onset essential tremor is associated with dementia. Neurology. (2006) 66:1500–5. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000216134.88617.de [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Louis ED, Benito-León J, Vega-Quiroga S, Bermejo-Pareja F, Neurological Disorders inCentral Spain Study Group . Faster rate of cognitive decline in essential tremor cases than controls: a prospective study. Eur J Neurol. (2010) 17:1291–97. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03122.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Knudsen K, Fedorova TD, Hansen AK, Sommerauer M, Otto M, Svendsen KB, et al. In-vivo staging of pathology in REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multimodality imaging case-control study. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:618–28. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30162-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Neurology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES