Skip to main content
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics logoLink to CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
. 2013 May 27;19(9):643–648. doi: 10.1111/cns.12125

Octodon degus: A Model for the Cognitive Impairment Associated with Alzheimer's Disease

Ernesto Tarragon 1,2, Dolores Lopez 2, Cristina Estrada 1, Gonzalez‐Cuello Ana 2, Esther Schenker 3, Fabien Pifferi 4, Regis Bordet 5, Jill C Richardson 6, Maria Trinidad Herrero 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6493546  PMID: 23710760

Summary

Octodon degus (O. degus) is a diurnal rodent that spontaneously develops several physiopathological conditions, analogous in many cases to those experienced by humans. In light of this, O. degus has recently been identified as a very valuable animal model for research in several medical fields, especially those concerned with neurodegenerative diseases in which risk is associated with aging. Octodon degus spontaneously develops β‐amyloid deposits analogous to those observed in some cases of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Moreover, these deposits are thought to be the key feature for AD diagnosis, and one of the suggested causes of cell loss and cognitive deficit. This review aims to bring together information to support O. degus as a valuable model for the study of AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer disease, Amyloid beta‐protein, Memory, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Octodon degus

Introduction

One of the major areas of interest in the field of neuroscience is the study of age‐related brain pathologies. Understanding the origin of such pathologies, as well as how they progress through different cellular mechanisms and how this process finally affects cognitive and behavioral processes is essential for developing therapies and intervention strategies. Among the vast variety of brain pathologies, Alzheimer's disease (AD) deserves special attention. Being a neurodegenerative disease, the symptoms do not appear spontaneously, but, unlike in the case of a psychosis or amnesia, gradually. The pathology progresses relentlessly until the symptoms are manifest and the memory function, as well as other cognitive domains such as orientation, problem solving, or even changes in personality, become apparent. In most cases, patients are no longer able to take care of themselves and require full‐time care 1.

Basic Research in Alzheimer's Disease

There are currently no approved disease‐modifying treatments that are able to halt or slow down the pathology in AD or other common neurodegenerative disease. There are, however, vast ranges of different pharmacological and psychological therapies in development stages that aim to slow down the advance of functional loss. However, it is clear that we need to understand more about the cause of this disease and its natural progression if we are to understand when and how to treat it.

There are several approaches to the study of AD, including those based on cellular models 2, 3, 4. Nonetheless, although these models may be very useful for unraveling the molecular mechanisms that underlie the symptomatology, there is a great gap between the conclusions deduced from them and the clinical outcome that this disease displays. On the other hand, the use of animal species may contribute not only to understanding cellular and pathophysiological characteristics of Alzheimer's, but also to reproduce the cognitive deficits shown in patients. In our mind, this could seem a more ecological and appropriate approach and one more suited for a better appreciation of the different features of the illness. In this sense, we could say that animal models are good for their capacity to imitate both pathophysiological conditions and behavioral outcome (if any). Therefore, it is fundamental for such models to be able to measure cognitive and behavioral function in an accurately and reliably way.

A number of animal models have been generated in an attempt to reproduce AD pathology. Most of these models have used rodents, and there have been some promising advances 5, 6, 7. Several studies have demonstrated that Alzheimer pathology markers are absent in wild‐type rodents, making it necessary to generate transgenic animals overexpressing human amyloid precursor protein (β‐APP) harboring familial AD mutations 8, 9, 10 or to perform intracerebral injections of Aβ aggregates 11, 12 to achieve homologous states of the disease.

Despite the wide range of animal models that are currently used in the study of behavioral and physiopathology features of AD 13, rodents are the most utilized. In the last decades, for instance, the number of transgenic models that have been developed has remarkably increased, widening the alternatives and targeting those characteristics that most significantly are identified within this neurodegenerative disease 14. As the Aβ cascade is the main hypothesis for the AD, the achievement of models that lead to the development of such characteristics is a milestone for the advance in understanding this pathology.

In this sense, following the Aβ hypothesis, transgenic models are mainly derived from different branches that overexpress three hallmarks identified as regard the AD: APP protein, presenilin 1 and 2, and tau protein 15, aiming to develop the characteristic amyloid accumulation and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) 16. The major advantage of these models is that they succeed in reproducing a similar pathophysiological and behavioral outcome that is observed among patients with AD 17, 18. However, although transgenic models have proved their value for the study of AD, they raise important restrictions.

In the first place, to our view, the most important limitation these models present is the need for genetic and/or pharmacological manipulation to reach the inherent pathophysiological state of Alzheimer's. For instance, it is known that patients with AD show a significant neuron loss 19, and this feature has to be implanted in the mouse because even transgenic models show no such loss without manipulation 20. Another important similarity between human and rodent pathology that these models lack of is the anatomical distribution of the senile plaques and NFT accumulation 17. In humans, neuronal death derived from these two properties has been primarily located in the prefrontal and parietal cortices (mainly hippocampus) 16. However, this allocation has not been achieved with the different models available. Taking this into account, the availability of a model that may cover these limitations would be undoubtedly appreciated (Table 1).

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of the Octodon degus with respect to other very commonly used rodent models for AD 10, 13

Model Line Advantages Disadvantages
TAU transgenic mice 72, 73 ✓PrP Accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau External manipulation
✓mThy1.2 Intracellular tau tangles Phenotype not representative of AD
✓R406W Cognitive impairment Tau positive astrocytes, not common in AD
✓V337M Neural plasticity impairment Regional expression of tau different in what is observed in AD
APP transgenic mice 74, 75 ✓APP23 Aβ deposits No tau pathology
✓PS2APP Senile plaques immunoreactive for hyperphosphorylated tau Lack of neuronal and synaptic loss
Cognitive impairment External manipulation
Triple transgenic mice 6, 10, 76 ✓3xTg‐AD Aβ deposits Lack of neuronal and synaptic loss
✓Tg2576 Mutant PS1, PS2, and ApoE External manipulation
Senile plaques
Neurofibrillary tangles
Cognitive impairment
Octodon degus 13, 28, 29, 33 Complete physiological phenotype Interindividual variability
Age‐related cognitive decline Breeding
Aβ deposits
Hyperphosphorylated tau
Extensive neuronal loss associated with age
Impaired neural transmission
Gliosis and Inflammation

AD, Alzheimer's disease; APP, amyloid precursor protein.

In recent years, a rodent endogenous to Chile, the Octodon degus (O. degus) has gained prominence as a valued model for many different diseases, including those related with neurodegeneration, as this animal may develop naturally several symptoms that can be linked to a similar number of pathological conditions (Figure 1). Because of its particular diurnal cycle, it has frequently been used in circadian studies 21, 22. It is also a highly social rodent, which explains its role in social and neuroaffective research 23, 24. However, over the last few years, the participation of degus in the study of neurodegeneration has suggested that this area of research is the most promising application of this model. This diurnal caviomorph rodent lives up to 7 years average in captivity 25, making it per se an interesting model for use in longitudinal studies, including those related in the neuropsychobiology of aging, and AD.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characteristics of Octodon degus. Brief description of several characteristics that naturally develop in the O. degus making it useful as an animal model in several fields. Numbers in brackets are for the correspondent reference in the bibliography.

Octodon‐Human Aβ Aggregates Similarities

Among the different hypotheses raised to explain the origin and evolution of AD, the most widely held is that which stresses the importance of cholinergic neurodegeneration and the appearance of two principal markers: the NFTs formed through the dysfunctional hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, and the deposition of Aβ aggregates, which are thought to be the trigger for neuronal death 26. However, the relationship between these two elements is not clear, although several hypotheses have attempted to link them 26, 27.

A few years ago, Inestrosa et al. 28 demonstrated that O. degus naturally develops characteristic histopathological hallmarks reminiscent to those typically found in patients with AD. The discovery showed that this rodent, in its natural environment, might produce plaques in different brain areas 29, including hippocampus and frontal cortex, both of which are severely affected in patients with AD 16. Moreover, immunohistochemical and genetic analyses performed on the O. degus revealed a high degree of similarity between human deposits and the Aβ precursor protein (Aβ‐PP). Also, RT‐PCR analysis showed the O. degus and human Aβ peptide sequence to be 97.5% homologous 28. This animal presents only one amino acid substitution with respect to the human, which presents an advantage to other models (rats, for example, present in their Aβ sequence three amino acid substitution; Figure 2). In this sense, differently to transgenic animals, there is no need to overexpress this human APP to generate significant levels of amyloid protein, which will help to avoid the overexpression of APP. This is an important question, as it has been postulated as to why there is a limited neuronal loss in the APP transgenic models and is one of the main advantages of the O. degus as a model in preclinical research of this pathology. AD models usually reproduce the pathological hallmarks of familial AD cases, which represent around 5% of total cases of AD 16. The initiating pathogenic mechanisms for the appearance of sporadic AD are not fully described, and due to the spontaneous growth of such markers in the O. degus, it could be advantageous to use this animal within an experimental context.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Amino acid Aβ sequence. Differences and similarities between mice/rat, human, and Octodon degus amino acid Aβ sequence. Differently from the mice/rat, the O. degus is only one amino acid different from the human sequence 28, 29.

Nevertheless, as promising as this animal might be, it still needs to satisfy certain requirements before it can be used as an appropriate model. In this sense, it is worth mentioning that the histopathological changes occurring in O. degus brains are only observed in aged animals 28, 29 and have never been detected in young animals so far. Similar comments may be made regarding tau, which suggests that amyloid and tau deposition are age dependent, as they are in patients with AD 30, 31 and in some of the more successful transgenic mice studied to date 10. Nevertheless, differently from transgenic models that require mutated form of tau 32, this mutation is neither present in humans nor in the O. degus, thus arising as a more suitable alternative given that similarly to what occurs in humans.

Another interesting analogy concerns the cholinergic system. The cerebral cortex of some human and non‐human primates contains acetylcholine (AChE)‐rich pyramidal neurons, which have been seen to decline in numbers during the progression of AD, a decrease claimed to be partly responsible for the memory deficits in Alzheimer patients 15, 19. Octodon degus apparently shares the same AChE‐rich neurons that are found in the cerebral cortex of adult humans. Moreover, the high degree of homology (97.5%) between the human and O. degus in Aβ sequence and the tau structure, possibly triggered by the Aβ found in these animals, suggests that both play a major role in the appearance of AD markers in this rodent, including the presence of extra‐ and intracellular amyloid deposits and NFTs 10, 28, 31.

Octodon degus, What Does It Offer?

We have already mentioned the histological advantages that this model presents for AD research. However, without a cognitive counterpart, assessment of this model is not complete. As mentioned above, one of the key features of an animal model for AD should be its ability to mimic the cognitive and behavioral response in the different domains affected by this illness.

It has been recently demonstrated that the age‐progressive accumulation of Aβ oligomers and phosphorylated tau proteins in O. degus from 12 to 36 months negatively correlated with their performance in spatial and object recognition memory measured by two different behavioral paradigms: the Object Recognition Memory task and a spatial T‐Maze. In this work, Ardiles et al. demonstrate that memory performance declines in an age‐dependent manner, as aged animals made fewer correct choices in the arms of the T‐Maze, and the time spent exploring the novel objects was significantly reduced in the object recognition task. Interestingly, the synaptic strength in the old O. degus was reduced compared with the young ones, and the postsynaptic transmission was also impaired 33.

As memory impairment is the first manifestation of AD symptoms and the most prominent of observable consequences, one of the requirements that O. degus should fulfill is that it should discriminate in different cognitive tests and different memory deficits classically impaired in AD. Moreover, this should be achieved in response to the different challenges that are used to induce cognitive impairment, one of the most widespread of which is sleep deprivation (SD).

Sleep deprivation has been widely documented as one of the challenges that most effectively induce transient cognitive impairment 34, 35, 36, 37 in animals 38, 39, 40 and humans [41]. SD has also been studied in the O. degus 42 (Figure 3). This condition affects the formation, expression, and retrieval of memories 36, 37 and produces a deficient consolidation in both procedural and declarative memories 34, 43. Evaluating memory impairment caused by this challenge in the O. degus is especially interesting, given their phase inversion capacity 22. Sleep‐wake deregulation is commonly seen in AD 44, 45 and is displayed as agitation, disrupted sleep, or breathing difficulties 44. Sleep studies performed on O. degus have demonstrated that, despite being diurnal, this animal is able to switch from diurnal to nocturnal phase behavior in a few days 46. Together with all the AD‐like hallmarks displayed by this rodent, this chronobiological characteristic adds value to the O. degus as an attractive model of the cognitive decline and behavioral outcome observed in age‐related neurodegenerative diseases and also confirms SD as an appropriate methodological choice. With this method, researchers would be able to induce transitory memory deficits in both young and old animals to further compare the impact of such procedure and the effect of aging and histopathological hallmarks formation on the behavioral outcome.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Procedural scheme of the sleep deprivation (SD) induced by gentle handling. Adapted to the normal diurnal activity of the Octodon degus, SD challenge starts at 7 p.m. in a 12/12‐h light and dark cycle. Gentle handling is a non‐stressful way of preventing the animal from sleeping. After the procedure, the behavioral test takes place 42.

The most noteworthy feature of AD is memory loss, but it is not the only one. Besides the well‐known deficit in problem solving 47, 48 and spatial orientation 48, 49, patients with AD also present a wide range of psychological affectations such as stress 50 and anxiety 51, 52, as well as different systemic impairments 53. In this sense, it has been demonstrated that the O. degus may develop atherosclerosis, a pathological states frequently concomitant with AD 54. It has been demonstrated that this rodent is able to develop an atherosclerosis condition directly derived from a rich‐cholesterol diet, together with a lipoprotein metabolism similar to humans 55. This combined with the presence of hyperglycemia strongly correlates with the appearance of type 2 diabetes 56. Interestingly, aged O. degus also share with humans these pathological conditions 55.

Despite the fact that many studies have shared inconsistent results concerning age‐related changes in anxiety in different rodent models 57, 58, there is evidence of a significant age‐related effect in O. degus (young and old adults) in the open‐field test and dark and light test, two widely validated procedures to assess anxiety in rodent models 59. Popovic et al. 60 explored the relationship between age and anxiety and demonstrated that the older group spent less time in the center of the open field compared with the young adult group and that the latter group were more willing to spend more time in the light than the older ones 61, suggesting that anxiety may increase with age in these animals.

Another AD‐like symptom that is apparent in the O. degus is related to their social life. It is known that in many cases of AD, patients tend to develop social problems mainly for two reasons: the dementia associated with the disorder and the stress caused to caregivers 62, 63. Octodon degus is generally described as a very social rodent with a highly complex social behavior 23, 24. However, as in AD, this animal is also subjected to problematic interactions with other members of its colony when stressful events occur 64. In this sense, Poeggel et al. 65 reported severe behavioral deficits and neural alterations in the frontal cortex, which also shown to be affected in patients with AD 63, 66.

It is also common to find patients who have difficulty in manipulating complex objects, or performing fine motor movements 67, 68. To date, the range of possibilities to test this particular deficit is scarce and is mainly confined to non‐human primates. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no literature covering manipulative and fine motor problems in rodents. Thus, it is worth mentioning that O. degus is the only rodent to date which has been demonstrated to be sensitive to training in object manipulation toward obtaining a reward 69. The authors of this work were able to train five animals to retrieve a food reward located in a platform that could only be reached using one of the different tools to which they were given access. Animals learned the task with the same efficiency as shown by non‐human primates in similar conditions 70, demonstrating an increasingly understanding of tool usage, not only regarding the physical properties of the tool, but also its functional attributes 69.

Further Directions

We have reviewed a range of studies performed with the O. degus, a diurnal rodent native to Chile. The main interest in this animal in the field of cognition is that it has recently been proposed as a putative model for AD, principally because it presents two of the major histopathological markers for this disorder (β‐Amyloid plaques and NFTs containing hyperphosphorylated tau). Several reports have also suggested that cognitive impairment in O. degus may be compared with that observed in humans. Therefore, this animal could represent one of the most promising models for the study of cognitive impairment associated with AD. While investigation with O. degus in the field of cognitive sciences is still in its early stages, we believe that the degus provides an excellent opportunity for exploring the mechanisms underlying late developmental changes in the nervous system, and therefore, the behavioral and cognitive outcomes resulting from such changes.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The activity leading to the present review has received funding from: (i) the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007‐2013) for the Innovative Medicine Initiative under Grant Agreement no 115009 (Prediction of cognitive properties of new drug candidates for neurodegenerative diseases in early clinical development, PharmaCog), (ii) EFPIA's kind contribution (www.imi.europa.eu), (iii) Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation, and (iv) the University Jaume I (project 13I004.01/1). We thank the staff of the University of Murcia for its help: Dr. Ana María Madariaga for her valuable comments, and M. Philip Thomas for language suggestions concerning the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Haak N, Peters M. Pilgrimages in partnering with palliative care. Alzheimers Care Today 2004;5:300–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Moghekar A, Rao S, Li M, et al. Large quantities of Abeta peptide are constitutively released during amyloid precursor protein metabolism in vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem 2011;286:15989–15997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Park SH, Kim JH, Bae SS, et al. Protective effect of the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor cilostazol on amyloid β‐induced cognitive deficits associated with decreased amyloid β accumulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011;408:602–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Leuner K, Schütt T, Kurz C, et al. Mitochondria‐derived ROS lead to enhanced amyloid beta formation. Antioxid Redox Signal 2012;16:1421–1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Asberom T, Zhao Z, Bara TA, et al. Discovery of gamma‐secretase inhibitors efficacious in a transgenic animal model of Alzheimer's disease. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007;17:511–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Filali M, Lalonde R, Theriault P, Julien C, Calon F, Planel E. Cognitive and non‐cognitive behaviors in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease expressing mutated APP, PS1, and Mapt (3xTg‐AD). Behav Brain Res 2012;234:334–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Howlett DR, Richardson JC. The pathology of APP transgenic mice: a model of Alzheimer's disease or simply overexpression of APP? Histol Histopathol 2009;24:83–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chishti MA, Yang DS, Janus C, et al. Early‐onset amyloid deposition and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice expressing a double mutant form of amyloid precursor protein 695. J Biol Chem 2001;276:21562–21570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Jawhar S, Wirths O, Schilling S, Graubner S, Demuth H‐U, Bayer T. Overexpression of glutaminyl cyclase, the enzyme responsible for pyroglutamate Ab formation, induces behavioural deficits, and glutaminyl cyclase knock‐out rescues the behavioural phenotype in 59FAD mice. J Biol Chem 2006;286:4454–4460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, et al. Triple‐transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Aβ and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron 2003;39:409–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gonzalo‐Ruiz A, Pérez JL, Sanz JM, Geula C, Arévalo J. Effects of lipids and aging on the neurotoxicity and neuronal loss caused by intracerebral injections of the amyloid‐beta peptide in the rat. Exp Neurol 2006;197:41–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Stepanichev MY, Moiseeva YV, Lazareva NA, Onufriev MV, Gulyaeva NV. Single intracerebroventricular administration of amyloid‐beta (25–35) peptide induces impairment in short‐term rather than long‐term memory in rats. Brain Res Bull 2003;61:197–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Braidy N, Muñoz P, Palacios AG, et al. Recent rodent models for Alzheimer's disease: clinical implications and basic research. J Neural Transm 2012;119:173–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hock BJ Jr, Lamb B. Transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Trends Genet 2011;17:S7–S12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Small SA, Duff K. Linking A‐beta and tau in late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: a dual pathway hypothesis. Neuron 2008;60:534–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ballard C, Gauthier S, Corbett A, Brayne C, Aarsland D, Jones E. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 2011;377:1019–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Götz J, Streffer JR, David D, et al. Transgenic animal models of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: histopathology, behavior and therapy. Mol Psychiatry 2004;9:664–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Romberg C, Mattson MP, Mughal MR, Bussey T, Saksida L. Impaired attention in the 3xTgAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: rescue by donepezil (Aricept). J Neurosci 2011;31:3500–3507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Esiri MM, Chance SA. Vulnerability to Alzheimer's pathology in neocortex: the roles of plasticity and columnar organization. J Alzheimers Dis 2006;9:79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Calhoun ME, Wiederhold KH, Abramowski D, Phinney AL, Probst A. Neuron loss in APP transgenic mice. Nature 1998;395:755–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Otalora BB, Vivanco P, Madariaga AM, Madrid JA, Rol MA. Internal temporal order in the circadian system of a dual‐phasing rodent, the Octodon degus . Chronobiol Int 2010;27:1564–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Vivanco P, López‐Espinoza A, Madariaga AM, Rol MA, Madrid JA. Nocturnalism induced by scheduled feeding in diurnal Octodon degus . Chronobiol Int 2010;27:233–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Colonnello V, Iacobucci P, Fuchs T, Newberry RC, Panksepp J. Octodon degus. A useful animal model for social‐affective neuroscience research: basic description of separation distress, social attachments and play. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010;35:1854–1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Seidel K, Poeggel G, Holetschka R, Helmeke C, Braun K. Paternal deprivation affects the development of corticotrophin‐releasing factor‐expressing neurones in prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus of the biparental Octodon degus . J Neuroendocrinol 2011;23:1166–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lee TM. Octodon degus: a diurnal, social, and long‐lived rodent. ILAR J 2004;45:14–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Schliebs R, Arendt T. The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration. Behav Brain Res 2011;221:555–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Reyes AE, Chacoón MA, Dinamarca MC, Cerpa W, Morgan C, Inestrosa NC. Acetylcholinesterase‐Aβ complexes are more toxic than Aβ fibrils in rat hippocampus: effect on rat β‐amyloid aggregation, laminin expression, reactive astrocytosis and neuronal cell loss. Am J Pathol 2004;164:2163–2174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Inestrosa NC, Reyes AE, Chacón MA, et al. Human‐like rodent amyloid‐beta‐peptide determines Alzheimer pathology in aged wild‐type Octodon degu . Neurobiol Aging 2005;26:1023–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. van Groen T, Kadish I, Popović N, et al. Age‐related brain pathology in Octodon degu: blood vessel, white matter and Alzheimer‐like pathology. Neurobiol Aging 2011;32:1651–1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer's disease: genes, proteins, and therapy. Physiol Rev 2001;81:741–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Masters CL, Selkoe DJ. Biochemistry of amyloid β‐protein and amyloid deposits in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012;2:a006262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Tanemura K, Murayama M, Akagi T, Hashikawa T, Tominaga T, Ichikawa K. Neurodegeneration with tau accumulation in a transgenic mouse expressing V337M human tau. J Neurosci 2002;22:133–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ardiles AO, Tapia‐Rojas CC, Mandal M, et al. Postsynaptic dysfunction is associated with spatial and object recognition memory loss in a natural model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:13835–13840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Jugovac D, Cavallero C. Twenty‐four hours of total sleep deprivation selectively impairs attentional networks. Exp Psychol 2011;1:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. McEwen BS. Sleep deprivation as a neurobiologic and physiologic stressor: allostasis and allostatic load. Metabolism 2006;55:S20–S23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Huber R, Ghilardi MF, Massimini M, Tononi G. Local sleep and learning. Nature 2004;430:78–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Walker M, Stickgold P. Sleep‐dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron 2004;44:121–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Palchykova S, Crestani F, Meerlo P, Tobler I. Sleep deprivation and daily torpor impair object recognition in Djungarian hamsters. Physiol Behav 2006;87:144–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Alhaider IA, Aleisa AM, Tran TT, Alkadhi KA. Sleep deprivation prevents stimulation‐induced increases of levels of P‐CREB and BDNF: protection by caffeine. Mol Cell Neurosci 2011;46:742–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Alzoubi KH, Khabour OF, Rashid BA, Damaj IM, Salah HA. The neuroprotective effect of vitamin E on chronic sleep deprivation‐induced memory impairment: the role of oxidative stress. Behav Brain Res 2012;226:205–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dodds CM, Bullmore ET, Henson RN, et al. Effects of donepezil on cognitive performance after sleep deprivation. Hum Psychopharmacol 2011;26:578–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kas MJ, Edgar DM. Circadian timed wakefulness at dawn opposes compensatory sleep responses after sleep deprivation in Octodon degus . Sleep 1999;22:1045–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mu Q, Nahas Z, Johnson K, et al. Decreased cortical response to verbal working memory following sleep deprivation. Sleep 2005;28:55–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bliwise DL. Sleep disorders in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Clin Cornerstone 2004;6:S16–S28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Srinivasan V, Kaur C, Pandi‐Perumal S, Brown G, Cardinali D. Melatonin and its agonist ramelteon in Alzheimer's disease: possible therapeutic value. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2011;2011:741974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Vivanco P, Ortiz V, Rol MA, Madrid JA. Looking for the keys to diurnality downstream from the circadian clock: role of melatonin in a dual‐phasing rodent, Octodon degus . J Pineal Res 2007;42:280–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Sánchez‐Benavides G, Gómez‐Ansón B, Quintana M, et al. Problem‐solving abilities and frontal lobe cortical thickness in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2010;16:836–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jacobs HIL, Van Boxtel MPJ, Jolles J, Verhey FRJ, Uylings HBM. Parietal cortex matters in Alzheimer's disease: an overview of structural, functional and metabolic findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:297–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Laczó J, Andel R, Vyhnalek M, et al. Human analogue of the morris water maze for testing subjects at risk of Alzheimer's disease. Neurodegener Dis 2010;7:148–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Stonnington CM, Locke DEC, Dueck AC, Caselli RJ. Anxiety affects cognition differently in healthy apolipoprotein E ε4 homozygotes and non‐carriers. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011;23:294–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Vloeberghs E, Van Dam D, Franck F, Staufenbiel M, De Deyn PP. Mood and male sexual behaviour in the APP23 model of Alzheimer's disease. Behav Brain Res 2007;180:146–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gallagher D, Coen R, Kilroy D, et al. Anxiety and behavioural disturbance as markers of prodromal Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;26:166–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Silvestrini M, Viticchi G, Falsetti L, et al. The role of carotid atherosclerosis in Alzheimer's disease progression. J Alzheimers Dis 2011;25:719–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Yarchoan M, Xie SX, Kling MA, et al. Cerebrovascular atherosclerosis correlates with Alzheimer pathology in neurodegenerative dementias. Brain 2012;135:3749–3756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Homan R, Hanselman JC, Bak‐Mueller S, et al. Atherosclerosis in Octodon degus (degu) as a model for human disease. Atheroschlerosis 2010;212:48–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Fujisawa K, Katakami N, Kaneto H, et al. Circulating soluble RAGE as a predictive biomarker of cardiovascular event risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Atheroschlerosis 2013;227:425–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Boguszewski P, Zagrodzka J. Emotional changes related to age in rats – a behavioral analysis. Behav Brain Res 2002;133:323–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Torras‐Garcia M, Costa‐Miserachs D, Coll‐Andreu M, Portell‐Cortés I. Decreased anxiety levels related to aging. Exp Brain Res 2005;164:177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ramos A. Animal models of anxiety: do I need multiple tests? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008;29:493–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Popović N, Baño‐Otálora B, Rol MA, Caballero‐Bleda M, Madrid JA, Popović M. Aging and time‐of‐day effects on anxiety in female Octodon degus . Behav Brain Res 2009;200:117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wilks SE, Little KG, Gough HR, Spurlock WJ. Alzheimer's aggression: influences on caregiver coping and resilience. J Gerontol Soc Work 2011;54:260–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Gonzalez EW, Polansky M, Lippa CF, Walker D, Feng D. Family caregivers at risk: who are they? Issues Ment Health Nurs 2011;32:528–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Stubbs B. Displays of inappropriate sexual behaviour by patients with progressive cognitive impairment: the forgotten form of challenging behaviour? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2011;18:602–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Helmeke C, Seidel K, Poeggel G, Bredy TW, Abraham A, Braun K. Paternal deprivation during infancy results in dendrite‐ and time‐specific changes of dendritic development and spine formation in the orbitofrontal cortex of the biparental rodent Octodon degus . Neuroscience 2009;163:790–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Poeggel G, Nowicki L, Braun K. Early social deprivation alters monoaminergic afferents in the orbital prefrontal cortex of Octodon degus . Neuroscience 2003;116:617–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Shany‐Ur T, Rankin KP. Personality and social cognition in neurodegenerative disease. Curr Opin Neurol 2011;24:550–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Yan JH, Rountree S, Massman P, Doody RS, Li H. Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment deteriorate fine movement control. J Psychiatr Res 2008;42:1203–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ameli M, Kemper F, Sarfeld AS, Kessler J, Fink GR, Nowak DA. Arbitrary visuo‐motor mapping during object manipulation in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113:453–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Okanoya K, Tokimoto N, Kumazawa N, Hihara S, Iriki A. Tool‐use training in a species of rodent: the emergence of an optimal motor strategy and functional understanding. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ishibashi H, Hihara S, Iriki A. Acquisition and development of monkey tool‐use: behavioral and kinematic analyses. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2000;78:958–966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Brown C, Donnelly TM. Cataracts and reduced fertility in degus (Octodon degus). Contracts secondary to spontaneous diabetes mellitus. Lab Anim (NY) 2001;30:25–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Ebensperger LA, Ramírez‐Estrada J, León C, et al. Sociality, glucocorticoids and direct fitness in the communally rearing rodent, Octodon degus . Horm Behav 2011;60:346–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Redy PH. Abnormal tau, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired axonal transport of mitochondria, and synaptic deprivation in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res 2012;1415:136–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Gilley J, Adalbert R, Coleman MP. Modelling early responses to neurodegenerative mutations in mice. Biochem Soc Trans 2011;39:933–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Balducci C, Forloni G. APP transgenic mice: their use and limitations. Neuromolecular Med 2011;13:117–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kokjohn TA, Roher AE. Amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse models and Alzheimer's disease: understanding the paradigms, limitations, and contributions. Alzheimers Dement 2009;5:340–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES