Hypertension is a major risk factor for cerebral infarction (CI). Measures of blood pressure, including diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and pulse pressure (PP), as well as heart rate (HR) have been associated with target organ damage, especially CI [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Relative contribution of these measures to the CI risk, however, remains controversial [6, 7]. The purpose of the present study is to devise a compound index that includes these factors to predict CI risk.
Briefly, this retrospective study included 1661 elderly (>60 years of age) male patients. The impact of DBP, SBP, PP, and HR on the risk of CI was examined. All patients visited the Geriatrics Department of Xin Hua Hospital for atherosclerosis‐related diseases. Patients with various acute diseases and advanced stage of malignancy or valvular heart diseases were excluded. All patients underwent 24‐h arterial blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).
The 24‐h ABPM data were used to generate BP index (e.g., average SBP, DBP, and HR). PP was defined as P = SBP−DBP. The dynamic level (DL) of blood pressure was defined as:
![]() |
The 1661 patients were divided into 19 subgroups based on BP indices that included DL. Each BP index average value with incidence of CI represents a datum. A total of 19 data points were generated. These 19 data points reflect the trend of CI incidence from the 1661 patients, followed a pattern of normal distribution. This “smooth distribution curve” is typically used to reflect the variation trend for a set of data as described previously [8]. The standard error, σ, between the incidence of CI Fi and the corresponding value in “smooth curve”fi, is defined as19:
![]() |
The x and y value for DL are determined by minimization process of σ value. For the current study, x and y were 0.2 and 0.8, respectively. Thus, DL was calculated as
![]() |
All variables were analyzed using a two‐tailed Student's t‐test with the SPSS 16 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A comparison of the traditional BP indices, e.g., SBP, PP, DBP, and HR, between the CI and non‐CI groups showed that all measures except HR is correlated to CI risk (Table 1). For comparison, we examined the correlation of traditional blood pressure indices and DL with incidence of CI. DL had the strongest correlation with the incidence of CI (Table 2).
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects at index blood pressure according to subsequent CI status
No CI | CI | |
---|---|---|
Number | 920 | 607 |
Age (years) | 79 ± 6 | 81 ± 5*** |
SBPmean (mmHg) | 130 ± 17 | 133 ± 18*** |
SBPmax (mmHg) | 161 ± 22 | 165 ± 23** |
SBPmin (mmHg) | 101 ± 16 | 104 ± 17** |
DBPmean (mmHg) | 71 ± 9 | 72 ± 9* |
DBPmax (mmHg) | 92 ± 12 | 93 ± 13* |
DBPmin (mmHg) | 53 ± 8 | 53 ± 8* |
PPmean (mmHg) | 58 ± 13 | 61 ± 14*** |
PPmax (mmHg) | 81 ± 17 | 84 ± 18*** |
PPmin (mmHg) | 37 ± 11 | 39 ± 13** |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Table 2.
The correlation between different BP index and the incidence of CI
SBPmean | DBPmean | PPmean | HRmean | DLmean | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | 0.02 | 0.77 | 0.001 | 0.62 | <0.0001 |
r | 0.66 | −0.07 | 0.68 | 0.12 | 0.85 |
σ | 0.042 | 0.054 | 0.049 | 0.056 | 0.015 |
The newly devised index DL describes the overall effects of the blood pressure by including all three directly measured indices (SBP, DBP, and HR). An increase of DL corresponded to high risk of CI in our study. This finding is consistent with other studies that demonstrated that an increase in SBP leads to increased incidence for CI [9]. This is reflected by; PP is an independent risk factor for cardio‐cerebral‐vascular diseases. This is reflected by
; the increase of heart rate is closely related to cardiovascular events. This is reflected by
; in classical cases of Rourke and Frohlich [10], the condition of the patients worsened when blood pressure was reduced from 188/124 to 142/64 mmHg. This is reflected by the 28% increase of DL value.
The incidence of CI is affected by multiple factors rather than by any single factor. The DL value provides a good reference in properly lowering SBP and DPB to prevent the incidence of CI. The current study recruited only elderly male patients with arteriosclerotic diseases. As such, the applicability of this model in other patient populations remains to be investigated.
The authors thank the support from Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (09JC1411100), and Foundation of National Lab for Infrared Physics (200901).
References
- 1. Saver JL. Proposal for a universal definition of cerebral infarction. Stroke 2008;39:3110–3115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zanchetti A. Blood pressure targets of antihypertensive treatment: Up and down the J‐shaped curve. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2837–2840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, McGee DL, Dawber TR, McNamara P, Castelli WP. Systolic blood pressure, arterial rigidity, and risk of stroke. The Framingham study. JAMA 1981;245:1225–1229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bangalore S, Messerli FH, Franklin SS, Mancia G, Champion A, Pepine CJ. Pulse pressure and risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease: An INternational VErapamil SR‐trandolapril STudy (INVEST) analysis. Eur Heart J 2009;30:1395–1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bangalore S, Messerli FH, Ou FS, et al The association of admission heart rate and in-hospital cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from 135164 patients in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Eur Heart J 2010;31:552–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Benetos A, Safar M, Rudnichi A, et al Pulse pressure: A predictor of long‐term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population. Hypertension 1997;30:1410–1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Strauss MH, Hall AS. Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risks: KYOTO HEART Study. Eur Heart J 2010;31:261–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Duan JL, Hao CN, Lu W, et al A new method for assessing variability of 24 h blood pressure and its first application in 1526 elderly men. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2009;36:1093–1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Li Y, Wang JG, Dolan E, Gao PJ, Guo HF, Nawrot T, et al Ambulatory arterial stiffness index derived from 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 2006;47:359–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. O’Rourke M, Frohlich ED. Pulse pressure: Is this a clinically useful risk factor? Hypertension 1999;34:372–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]