Abstract
Changing trends in incidence and antifungal susceptibility patterns of six Candida species causing candidemia in Kuwait between 2006–2017 are reported. A total of 2075 isolates obtained from 1448 patients were analyzed. Identity of Candida species isolates was determined by phenotypic methods and confirmed by PCR amplification/PCR-sequencing of rDNA and/or MALDI-TOF MS. Antifungal susceptibility was determined by Etest. C. albicans accounted for 539 (37.22%) cases followed by C. parapsilosis (n = 502, 34.67%), C. tropicalis (n = 210, 14.5%), C. glabrata (n = 148, 10.22%), C. krusei (n = 27, 1.81%) and C. dubliniensis (n = 22, 1.5%). The comparative percent distribution of Candida species causing candidemia between 2006–2011 and 2012–2017 was as follows: C. albicans 41.8% and 33.1%, C. parapsilosis complex 32.01% and 37.04%, C. tropicalis 13.59% and 15.31%, and C. glabrata 8.77% and 11.51%, C. krusei 2.0% and 1.7%, and C. dubliniensis 1.75 and 1.3%, respectively. Three of 371 C. albicans isolates during 2006–2011 and five of 363 during 2012–2017 were resistant to fluconazole. Among C. parapsilosis isolates, one of 310 during 2006–2011 and 21 of 446 during 2012–2017 were resistant to this drug. Furthermore, at an epidemiologic cutoff value (ECV) of ≤0.5 μg/ml, 70.1% C. albicans isolates were wild-type for fluconazole during 2006–2011 as compared to 58.1% during 2012–2017. Likewise, at an ECV of ≤2 μg/ml, 98.0% of C. parapsilosis isolates were wild-type during 2006–2011 as compared to 93.4% during 2012–2017. Clonal spread of fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis in one major hospital was documented. An 8.8% shift in favor of non-albicans Candida species with concomitant increase in MICs between the two periods preludes emergence of fluconazole-resistant candidemia cases in Kuwait.
Introduction
Candida species are a major cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection (BSI) worldwide [1, 2]. They are associated with considerable infection-related morbidity and mortality, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU), where at least 50% episodes of candidemia occur [3]. While C. albicans continues to be the most frequently isolated bloodstream pathogen in most studies, there is a gradual shift towards non-albicans Candida species (C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis), which together account for >50% cases of candidemia [1, 2, 4]. Considerable differences exist in the number of cases caused by individual non-albicans Candida species depending upon the geographic region, patient population, age and prior exposure to antifungal agents [1, 5]. Regardless of the geographical area, C. albicans is more frequent in patients aged up to 18 years, the frequency of C. parapsilosis decreases with age and C. glabrata is more common among the elderly [1]. Studies from Northern Europe and the USA [4, 6] have reported relatively a higher number of cases due to C. glabrata as compared to Spain and Brazil, where a higher number of cases were caused by C. parapsilosis [1]. On the contrary, C. tropicalis is the most common non-albicans Candida species in Asia [7]. Like many other countries, candidemia is also an important cause of BSI both in adult and pediatric patients in Kuwait [8–15]. In a previous study, we have reported species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profile of bloodstream isolates obtained during a 10-year period (1996–2005) [8]. Herein, we aimed to identify epidemiological changes that have occurred in the distribution and antifungal susceptibility pattern of six Candida species during a 12-year period since 2006.
Materials and methods
Bloodstream yeast isolates and phenotypic methods for identification
Candida species isolates were grown from blood collected after obtaining informed verbal consent from patients for routine diagnosis. The isolates were referred to Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL) as a part of routine patient care for identification and susceptibility testing. Since this retrospective study did not involve human participants, no specific ethical approval was required. Patients details were fully anonymized and results on de-identified samples are presented in this manuscript. Six Candida species/species complexes viz. C. albicans, C. parapsilosis sensu lato, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. dubliniensis and C. krusei were included. A total of 1448 culture confirmed candidemia cases due to six Candida species were recorded during the 12-year study period (2006 to 2017) across Kuwait. Repeat bloodstream isolates were also obtained from several patients with persistent candidemia. The bloodstream isolates were divided into two 6-year study periods that is 2006 to 2011 and 2012 to 2017 to compare relative shift in the prevalence of Candida species. The isolates were identified by phenotypic methods which included germ tube test, colony characteristics on CHROMagar Candida and VITEK2 yeast identification system.
Molecular identification
The identity of the isolates which showed unusual phenotypic and/or antifungal susceptibility pattern or resistance to antifungal drugs was confirmed by PCR amplification/PCR-sequencing of rDNA, performed as described in detail previously [16,17]. C. parapsilosis sensu stricto were differentiated from C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis by a multiplex PCR, as described previously [18, 19]. The identity of the isolates was also confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) as described previously [20].
Antifungal susceptibility testing
The in vitro activity of the antifungal agents was determined by E-test (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). The test was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Petri dishes (150 mm diameter) containing 60 ml RPMI agar supplemented with 2% glucose and buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS were used. The inoculum was applied with cotton swabs using growth suspension prepared in 0.85% NaCl with turbidity adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard. Plates were incubated at 35°C and read after 24 h. Reference strains of C. albicans (ATCC 90028) and Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used for quality control. Susceptibility breakpoints used for interpretation of susceptible, intermediate/ susceptible dose-dependent and resistant strains were those recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [21]. Due to lack of defined breakpoints for amphotericin B, isolates showing an MIC of ≤1.0/μg ml were taken as susceptible and those with MIC >1μg/ml as resistant [22]. The CLSI epidemiologic cutoff values (ECV) of fluconazole for C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis were ≤0.5 μg/ml, ≤2 μg/ml and ≤2 μg/ml, respectively, as also proposed by Pfaller & Diekema [23].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate and probability levels <0.05 by the two-tailed test were considered as statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed by using WinPepi software ver. 11.65 (PEPI for Windows, Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA).
Results
The species distribution of 2075 Candida species isolates obtained from 1448 candidemia patients during the 12-year study period are presented in Table 1. C. albicans was the most frequently isolated species accounting for 539 (37.22%) cases closely followed by 502 (34.67%) cases due to C. parapsilosis complex isolates including C. orthopsilosis (n = 5) and C. metapsilosis (n = 2). The remaining cases were due to C. tropicalis (n = 210, 14.5%), C. glabrata (n = 148, 10.22%), C. krusei (n = 27, 1.81%) and C. dubliniensis (n = 22, 1.5%) (Table 1). The comparative percent distribution of Candida species causing candidemia between 2006–2011 and 2012–2017 was as follows: C. albicans 41.8% and 33.1%, C. parapsilosis complex 32.01% and 37.04%, C. tropicalis 13.59% and 15.31%, and C. glabrata 8.77% and 11.51%, and C. krusei 2.0% and 1.7%, respectively (Table 1). There was an overall increase of 8.8% candidemia cases caused by non-albicans Candida species during 2012–2017.
Table 1. Distribution of 2075 Candida species isolated from 1448 candidemia patients obtained during 2006–2011 and 2012–2017.
Species/ complexes | Distribution of candidemia cases and isolates during | Total cases (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006–2011 | 2012–2017 | ||||
Cases (%) | Isolates (%) | Cases (%) | Isolates (%) | ||
C. albicans | 286 (41.8) | 405 (41.75) | 253 (33.11) | 363 (32.85) | 539 (37.22) |
C. dubliniensis | 12 (1.75) | 16 (1.64) | 10 (1.30) | 11 (0.99) | 22 (1.5) |
C. parapsilosis* | 219 (32.01) | 332 (34.22) | 283 (37.04) | 450 (40.72) | 502 (34.66) |
C. tropicalis | 93 (13.59) | 126 (12.98) | 117 (15.31) | 150 (13.57) | 210 (14.5) |
C. glabrata | 60 (8.77) | 76 (7.83) | 88 (11.51) | 115 (10.40) | 148 (10.2) |
C. krusei | 14 (2.04) | 15 (1.54) | 13 (1.70) | 16 (1.44) | 27 (1.8) |
Total | 684 | 970 | 764 | 1105 | 1448 |
*Includes 7 C. orthopsilosis isolates from 5 cases and 2 C. metapsilosis isolates from 2 cases
The year-wise distribution of Candida species isolates during the study period and the annual incidence rate of candidemia are presented in Table 2. Although C. albicans was the most frequently isolated species during 2006 to 2012, it was replaced by C. parapsilosis sensu stricto in the next four years (2013 to 2016) as the most frequently isolated Candida species from candidemia patients (numbers shown in bold). The isolation frequency of C. albicans varied from a low of ~29% in 2013 and 2016 to a high value of 52.2% in 2011, however, it showed a general declining trend over the study period. On the other hand, the isolation frequency of C. parapsilosis showed a declining trend during 2006 to 2011 and then an upward trend during 2012 to 2016 (Table 2). C. tropicalis and C. glabrata were recorded as the third and fourth most frequently isolated Candida species in Kuwait, respectively, and the isolation frequency of both the species generally showed an upward trend during the study period (Table 2). Consistent with these data, the ratio of isolation of C. albicans versus all six Candida species isolates declined from 0.46 in 2006 to 0.33 in 2017. The annual incidence rate (number of candidemia cases per 100, 000 population) showed a declining trend (from 4.45 to 3.5) in Kuwait over the study period (Table 2). One-third of candidemia cases (n = 480) occurred among neonates and there was a >2-fold increase in isolation of C. parapsilosis from neonates in Maternity Hospital during 2012–2017 (n = 115) as compared to 2006–2011 (n = 49). C. glabrata was isolated in greater number from elderly immunocompromised patients including those with cancer, that is, 23 isolates in 2012–2017 as compared to only 4 in 2006–2011. None of the bloodstream C. glabrata isolate was identified as C. nivariensis or C. bracarensis by PCR amplification and/or PCR-sequencing of rDNA.
Table 2. Year-wise distribution of Candida species and population-based incidence of candidemia in Kuwait (2006–2017).
Year | C. albicans | C. parapsilosis | C. tropicalis | C. glabrata | C. dubliniensis | C. krusei | Total | Ratio of C. albicans/ all Candida species | Total Kuwait population | Annual incidence/105 population* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 49 | 41 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 106 | 0.46 | 2377258 | 4.45 |
2007 | 44 | 39 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 104 | 0.42 | 2503410 | 4.15 |
2008 | 43 | 35 | 21 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 116 | 0.37 | 2652340 | 4.37 |
2009 | 43 | 36 | 17 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 118 | 0.36 | 2818939 | 4.18 |
2010 | 49 | 45 | 18 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 129 | 0.38 | 2998083 | 4.3 |
2011 | 58 | 23 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 111 | 0.52 | 3191051 | 3.47 |
2012 | 41 | 26 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 99 | 0.41 | 3396556 | 2.91 |
2013 | 29 | 37 | 16 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 99 | 0.29 | 3598386 | 2.75 |
2014 | 46 | 63 | 17 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 147 | 0.31 | 3782450 | 3.88 |
2015 | 50 | 55 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 142 | 0.35 | 3935794 | 3.6 |
2016 | 39 | 58 | 20 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 132 | 0.29 | 4052584 | 3.25 |
2017 | 48 | 44 | 29 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 145 | 0.33 | 4136528 | 3.5 |
*Mean annual incidence is 3.69/105 population.
Numbers in bold indicate most common species in that year.
The antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida species isolates obtained during the study period were determined by Etest against four antifungal drugs, viz. fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin and the data are presented in Tables 3 and 4. None of the C. albicans (n = 741), C. parapsilosis sensu lato (n = 763), C. tropicalis (n = 264), and C. dubliniensis (n = 26) isolates tested in this study was resistant to amphotericin B as their MIC values were ≤1.0/μgml. Only one of 31 C. krusei and 2 of 190 C. glabrata isolates were resistant to amphotericin B as their MIC values were >1.0 μgml. On the other hand, resistance to fluconazole and cross-resistance to voriconazole was detected more frequently. Only eight C. albicans isolates were resistant to fluconazole and five of these were isolated during 2012–2017. Three of these isolates also showed cross-resistance to voriconazole. Although resistance to fluconazole in C. albicans increased during 2012 to 2017 compared to 2006 to 2011, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.501). However, resistance rate among C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates increased over time for both fluconazole and voriconazole and these differences were statistically significant (P = 0.000 and P = 0.021, respectively) (Table 3). Resistance to fluconazole was also detected more frequently among C. glabrata isolates during 2012 to 2017 compared to 2006 to 201, however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.070) (Table 3).
Table 3. Prevalence of antifungal drug resistance among bloodstream isolates of major Candida species/complexes tested during 2006–2011 and 2012 to 2017 in Kuwaita.
Antifungal drug | Duration | Candida albicans | Candida parapsilosis | Candida orthopsilosis | Candida tropicalis | Candida glabrata | Candida krusei | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. tested | Resistant (%) | No. tested | Resistant (%) | No. tested | Resistant (%) | No. tested | Resistant (%) | No. tested | Resistant (%) | No. tested | Resistant (%) | ||
Amphotericin B | 2006–2011 | 378 | 0 | 310 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 114 | 0 | 75 | 1 (1.4) | 15 | 1 (6.7) |
2012–2017 | 363 | 0 | 446 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 115 | 1 (1.1) | 16 | 0 | |
Fluconazole | 2006–2011 | 371 | 3 (0.8) | 310 | 1 (0.3) | 5 | 0 | 112 | 1 (0.8) | 74 | 3 (4.1) | 13 | 0 |
2012–2017 | 363 | 5 (1.4) | 446 | 21 (4.7)b | 2 | 0 | 150 | 1 (0.7) | 115 | 14 (12.2) | 16 | 0 | |
Voriconazole | 2006–2011 | 331 | 4 (1.2) | 274 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 108 | 1 (0.9) | 62 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
2012–2017 | 304 | 4 (1.3) | 360 | 7 (1.9)b | 1 | 0 | 117 | 0 | 84 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
aBloodstream isolates of all Candida species tested in this study were susceptible to caspofungin and all isolates of C. dubliniensis were additionally susceptible to amphotericin B, fluconazole and voriconazole
bSignificantly higher rates of resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole observed for C. parapsilosis during 2012 to 2017 compared to 2006 to 2011 period are highlighted in boldface numbers
Table 4. Comparison of antifungal susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of five major Candida species/complexes tested during 2006–2011 and 2012–2017.
Candida Species/Antifungal agent | 2006–2011 | 2012–2017 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of isolates | Range (μg/ml) | MIC50 | MIC90 | GM (μg/ml) | % Resistance (n)** | No. of isolates | Range (μg/ml) | MIC50 | MIC90 | GM (μg/ml) | % Resistance (n)** | |
Amphotericin B | ||||||||||||
C. albicans | 378 | 0.002–0.75 | 0.047 | 0.125 | 0.04 ± 0.07 | 0 | 363 | 0.002–0.38 | 0.047 | 0.125 | 0.04 ± 0.05 | 0 |
C. dubliniensis* | 15 | 0.002–0.125 | 0.012 | 0.047 | 0.011 ± 0.03 | 0 | 11 | 0.003–0.094 | 0.008 | 0.032 | 0.013 ± 0.025 | 0 |
C. parapsilosis | 310 | 0.002–1 | 0.023 | 0.094 | 0.02 ± 0.11 | 0 | 446 | 0.002–0.75 | 0.023 | 0.094 | 0.02 ± 0.08 | 0 |
C. orthopsilosis* | 5 | 0.008–0.125 | 0.023 | 0.125 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0 | 2 | 0.008–0.064 | - | - | 0.022 ± 0.039 | 0 |
C. tropicalis | 114 | 0.002–0.75 | 0.047 | 0.19 | 0.04 ± 0.11 | 0 | 150 | 0.003–0.5 | 0.064 | 0.19 | 0.06 ± 0.07 | 0 |
C. glabrata | 75 | 0.004–2 | 0.094 | 0.25 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | 1.4 (1) | 115 | 0.002–32 | 0.125 | 0.38 | 0.10 ± 2.97 | 1.07 (1) |
C. krusei | 15 | 0.094–6 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.14 ± 1.51 | 6.66 (1) | 16 | 0.012–0.5 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.13 ± 0.14 | 0 |
Fluconazole | ||||||||||||
C. albicans | 371 | 0.004- ≥256 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.39 ± 22.91 | 0.8 (3) | 363 | 0.094–24 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.55 ± 1.86 | 1.37 (5) |
C. dubliniensis* | 15 | 0.016–0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.24 ± 0.22 | 0 | 11 | 0.125–1 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.34 ± 0.26 | 0 |
C. parapsilosis | 310 | 0.016–32 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.33 ± 1.88 | 0.32 (1) | 446 | 0.047-≥256 | 0.75 | 1.5 | 0.69 ± 41.24 | 4.7 (21) |
C. orthopsilosis* | 5 | 0.19–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 ± 0.15 | 0 | 2 | 0.25–0.38 | - | - | 0.308 ± 0.091 | 0 |
C. tropicalis | 112 | 0.012–8 | 0.75 | 2 | 0.55 ± 1.05 | 0.8 (1) | 150 | 0.023-≥256 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.43 ± 20.86 | 0.66(1) |
C. glabrata | 74 | 0.064-≥256 | 0.094 | 32 | 7.17 ± 49.68 | 4.05 (3) | 115 | 0.75-≥256 | 12 | 64 | 12.43 ± 54.83 | 12.17 (14) |
C. krusei | 13 | 6–64 | 24 | 64 | 21.65 ± 21.57 | - | 16 | 0.38–48 | 16 | 32 | 14.11 ± 13.25 | - |
Voriconazole | ||||||||||||
C. albicans | 331 | 0.002-≥32 | 0.023 | 0.094 | 0.02 ± 3.03 | 1.2 (4) | 304 | 0.002–1.5 | 0.023 | 0.125 | 0.02 ± 0.16 | 1.3 (4) |
C. dubliniensis* | 15 | 0.004–0.19 | 0.016 | 0.064 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0 | 11 | 0.006–0.094 | 0.008 | 0.023 | 0.011 ± 0.025 | 0 |
C. parapsilosis | 274 | 0.002–0.38 | 0.016 | 0.047 | 0.015 ± 0.037 | 0 | 360 | 0.002-≥32 | 0.023 | 0.094 | 0.024 ± 2.39 | 1.94 (7) |
C. orthopsilosis* | 5 | 0.006–0.125 | 0.008 | 0.125 | 0.014 ± 0.05 | 0 | 1 | 0.012 | - | - | - | 0 |
C. tropicalis | 108 | 0.003–2 | 0.047 | 0.125 | 0.046 ± 0.196 | 0.92 (1) | 117 | 0.004–0.75 | 0.047 | 0.125 | 0.042 ± 0.079 | 0 |
C. glabrata | 62 | 0.016–4 | 0.125 | 0.75 | 0.15 ± 0.58 | - | 84 | 0.032-≥32 | 0.25 | 1.5 | 0.31 ± 3.51 | - |
C. krusei | 14 | 0.047–0.5 | 0.094 | 0.38 | 0.13 ± 0.14 | 0 | 12 | 0.047–0.38 | 0.125 | 0.38 | 0.16 ± 0.12 | 0 |
Caspofungin | ||||||||||||
C. albicans | 65 | 0.002–0.38 | 0.094 | 0.19 | 0.05 ± 0.07 | 0 | 363 | 0.002–0.38 | 0.094 | 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0 |
C. dubliniensis* | 1 | 0.047 | - | - | - | 0 | 11 | 0.032–0.19 | 0.064 | 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0 |
C. parapsilosis | 32 | 0.012–1.5 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.27 ± 0.34 | 0 | 446 | 0.002–1 | 0.38 | 0.5 | 0.29 ± 0.15 | 0 |
C. orthopsilosis* | 1 | 0.38 | - | - | - | 0 | 2 | 0.38–0.5 | - | - | 0.43 ± 0.084 | 0 |
C. tropicalis | 29 | 0.008–0.75 | 0.094 | 0.25 | 0.093 ± 0.147 | 0 | 150 | 0.002–0.38 | 0.125 | 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 |
C. glabrata | 9 | 0.047–0.38 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.129 ± 0.107 | 0 | 115 | 0.002–0.38 | 0.125 | 0.19 | 0.11 ± 0.07 | 0 |
C. krusei | 5 | 0.125–0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 0 | 16 | 0.19–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.26 ± 0.104 | 0 |
*CLSI breakpoints as recommended for C. albicans and C. parapsilosis [19].
Fluconazole: C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis: ≤ 2 μg/ml (S), 4 μg/ml (SDD), ≥ 8 μg/ml (R); C. glabrata: ≤ 32 μg/ml (SDD), ≥ 64 μg/ml (R)
Voriconazole: C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis: ≤ 0.12 μg/ml (S), 0.25–0.5 μg/ml (I), ≥1 μg/ml; C. krusei: ≤ 0.5 μg/ml (S), 1 μg/ml (I), ≥ 2 μg/ml (R)
**Figures in parentheses indicate number of patients yielding resistant isolates.
The MIC50, MIC90 and the geometric mean of the MICs for amphotericin B and caspofungin remained nearly same for different Candida species during the study period (Table 4). None of the bloodstream isolates of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis and C. dubliniensis were resistant to amphotericin B and geometric mean of the MICs remained stable between the two study periods (Table 4). Only two isolates of C. glabrata were resistant to amphotericin B (MIC ≥1μg/ml), one each among the 75 isolates tested during 2006–2011 and 115 isolates during 2012–2017. Three of 371 (0.8%) C. albicans isolates tested during 2006–2011 and 5 of 363 (1.37%) isolates during 2012–2017 were resistant to fluconazole (MIC ≥8 μg /ml) (Tables 3 and 4). Three of these isolates also showed cross-resistance to voriconazole.
The comparative distribution of MIC values for fluconazole for four major Candida species (viz. C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata) isolates during the study period is presented in Table 5. The C. albicans and C. parapsilosis isolates showed an increasing trend in MICs to fluconazole. At an ECV of ≤0.5 μg/ml, 260 of 371 (70%) C. albicans isolates tested during 2006–2011 were wild-type for fluconazole as against 211 of 363 (58.1%) tested during 2012–2017 (Table 5). Emergence of fluconazole resistance was more pronounced among bloodstream isolates of C. parapsilosis. Of 310 C. parapsilosis isolates, only one isolate (0.3%) was resistant to this drug during 2006–2011 as against 21 of 446 (4.7%) isolates during 2012–2017. This observation was also supported by distribution of MIC values of the isolates obtained during the two periods (Table 5). At an ECV of ≤2 μg/ml, 304 of 310 (98.0%) isolates obtained during 2006–2011 were wild-type for fluconazole as against 417 of 446 (93.4%) isolates tested during 2012–2017 (Table 5). Among 21 fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis isolates, cross-resistance to voriconazole (MIC >1μg/ml) was observed in 7 isolates. One isolate each of C. tropicalis from both the periods (1 of 112 during 2006–2011 and 1 of 150 during 2012–2017) was resistant to fluconazole. None of the C. dubliniensis (n = 27), C. orthopsilosis (n = 7) and C. metapsilosis (n = 2) isolates were resistant to the four antifungal agents tested including fluconazole (Tables 3 and 4). Although C. glabrata intrinsically is less susceptible to azoles, a greater number of fluconazole-resistant isolates (14 of 115, 12%) were encountered in 2012–2017 than in 2006–2011 (3 of 74, 4.0%).
Table 5. Comparative distribution of four major Candida species obtained during 2006–2011 and 2012–2017.
Candida species / Antifungal agent | Year of testing | No. of isolates | MIC distribution of isolates (μg/ml by Etest) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤0.023 | 0.03 | 0.047 | 0.06 | 0.094 | 0.125 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 48 | ≥64 | |||
Amphotericin B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. albicans | 2006–2011 | 378 | 120 | 65 | 64 | 53 | 31 | 24 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 363 | 112 | 50 | 56 | 55 | 51 | 20 | 14 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
C. parapsilosis | 2006–2011 | 310 | 157 | 42 | 42 | 24 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 446 | 229 | 65 | 57 | 40 | 29 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
C. tropicalis | 2006–2011 | 114 | 33 | 10 | 18 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 150 | 21 | 16 | 19 | 20 | 29 | 24 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
C. glabrata | 2006–2011 | 75 | 18 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 115 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 22 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Fluconazole | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. albicans | 2006–2011 | 371 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 33 | 49 | 49 | 63 | 48 | 54 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
2012–2017 | 363 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 37 | 62 | 80 | 65 | 60 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
C. parapsilosis | 2006–2011 | 310 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 19 | 31 | 52 | 49 | 58 | 34 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2012–2017 | 446 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 34 | 35 | 66 | 66 | 86 | 66 | 28 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 14 | ||||||
C. tropicalis | 2006–2011 | 112 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
2012–2017 | 150 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 33 | 31 | 24 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
C. glabrata | 2006–2011 | 74 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 13 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||
2012–2017 | 115 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 13 | 17 | 13 | 17 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 14 | |||||||||||||
Voriconazole | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. albicans | 2006–2011 | 331 | 190 | 31 | 48 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 304 | 173 | 24 | 22 | 33 | 15 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||
C. parapsilosis | 2006–2011 | 274 | 209 | 25 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 360 | 224 | 48 | 27 | 18 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||
C. tropicalis | 2006–2011 | 108 | 34 | 9 | 13 | 10 | 22 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 117 | 36 | 18 | 13 | 20 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
C. glabrata | 2006–2011 | 51 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
2012–2017 | 84 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 10 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
Caspofungin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. albicans | 2006–2011 | 65 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 363 | 35 | 18 | 24 | 56 | 77 | 64 | 75 | 13 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
C. parapsilosis | 2006–2011 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 446 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 73 | 82 | 154 | 83 | 17 | 2 | |||||||||||||
C. tropicalis | 2006–2011 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 150 | 8 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 31 | 32 | 43 | 6 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
C. glabrata | 2006–2011 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012–2017 | 115 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 20 | 25 | 39 | 6 | 2 |
Note: Number of resistant isolates shown in bold.
Discussion
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are regarded as the diseases of medical progress. With the changes in clinical practice, the spectrum of fungi capable of causing IFI is also changing, and so is the epidemiology of invasive Candida infections. Candida infections form a major component of healthcare-associated IFIs and are associated with considerable mortality, varying from 29% to 72% in different patient populations representing different geographic regions/countries [24]. Like-wise, annual incidence of candidemia is also quite variable in different populations and age groups [24]. Surprisingly, the annual incidence rate (number of candidemia cases per 100,000 population) showed a declining trend (from 4.45 to 3.5) in Kuwait over the study period. One likely explanation for this decline is the rapid increase (from 2.377 million in 2006 to 4.136 million in 2017) in the total population of Kuwait particularly during 2010–2014, mostly due to influx of large number of younger (<40 years of age) and healthy expatriate workers who are less likely to have IFIs. In our previous study from Kuwait, we have reported C. albicans as the predominant species accounting for 39.5% of isolates over a 10-year period (1996–2005), followed by C. parapsilosis (30.0%), C. tropicalis (12.5%) and C. glabrata (5.6%) [8]. While C. albicans remained as the most frequently isolated species from candidemia patients during 2006 to 2012, it was replaced by C. parapsilosis sensu stricto during 2013 to 2016 as the most frequently isolated Candida species. Furthermore, the isolation frequency of C. tropicalis and C. glabrata also showed an upward trend during the study period. Consistent with these data, the ratio of isolation of C. albicans versus all six Candida species isolates declined nearly consistently from a high of 0.46 in 2006 to a low of 0.33 in 2017. Thus, the proportion of Candida species causing candidemia has significantly changed in favor of non-albicans Candida species. During the first half of the study (2006–2011), C. albicans accounted for 41.8% of bloodstream infections, followed by C. parapsilosis (32.01%), C. tropicalis (13.59%), and C. glabrata (8.77%). During the next six-year (2012–2017) period, the proportion of C. albicans decreased about 9% (33.11%), whereas C. parapsilosis showed an increase of >5% and the other two species, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata of about 2% each.
Our data are consistent with world reports showing that the prevalence of non-albicans Candida species is gradually increasing and other Candida species such as C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata or C. tropicalis are emerging as more frequent cause of bloodstream infections [1, 25–28]. C. glabrata has now become the dominant species in some centers of USA, Canada and Europe [4, 6] while C. parapsilosis has also become the dominant species in some centers/geographical locations [4, 28–30]. Additionally, many less common and newly recognized Candida species including Candida auris are being isolated with increasing frequency [31–35]
A comparative distribution of bloodstream isolates of Candida species from the Middle East is presented in Table 6 [8, 12, 36–47]. Recent studies from Qatar [43], Israel [44] and Iran [45] also indicate predominance of non-albicans Candida species as compared to C. albicans. Generally, the prevalence of C. tropicalis and C. glabrata has been reported to be ≤20% with one exception from Israel, where a higher rate of C. glabrata (23.7%) was reported in adult patients (Table 6) [8, 12, 36–61]. This shift towards non-albicans Candida species is consistent with many previous reports [1, 6, 24]. However, this shift is also somewhat species-specific. The largest proportional increase in C. glabrata has been observed in USA [4, 29], Australia [48] and Belgium [49]. In contrast, several surveillance and multicenter studies in other countries, such as Spain [50], Latin America [26, 28] and South Africa [51] have indicated the emergence of C. parapsilosis as the second most important cause of bloodstream infection after C. albicans. Consistent with many other studies from North America, Latin America, China and Europe [26, 28, 29, 52], C. tropicalis is the third most common cause of bloodstream infection in Kuwait. This is in contrast to countries of Asian Pacific region [53] as well as India [54] and Pakistan [55] where C. tropicalis is the second most common bloodstream pathogen after C. albicans. The epidemiologic factors that might have contributed to predominance of C. tropicalis in these countries are not fully understood.
Table 6. Distribution of Candida species isolated from candidaemia patients in different studies reported from the Middle East.
Reference | Study period | Country | No. of isolates | % Distribution of Candida species | % Ratio C. albicans/ non albicans | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. albicans | C. parapsilosis | C. tropicalis | C. glabrata | C. krusei | Others | |||||
Rennert et al. [36] | 1994 | Israel | 298 | 53.6 | 11.9 | 10.9 | 6.5 | 0.7 | 15.9 | 53.6/45.9 |
Bukharie [37] | 1995–2000 | Saudi Arabia | 32 | 19 | 44 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 19/81 |
Ellis et al. [38] | 1995–2001 | UAE | 60 | 45 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 45/55 |
Al-Jasser & Elkhizzi [39] | 1996–2002 | Saudi Arabia | 294 | 50.7 | 10.9 | 20.7 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 3.1 | 50.7/49.6 |
Al-Sweih et al. [12] | 1997–2006 | Kuwait | 153 | 41.2 | 49 | - | 1.3 | - | 8.49 | 41.2/58.79 |
Osoba et al. [40] | 1998–2002 | Saudi Arabia | 83 | 46 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 4.8 | 6 | 21.6 | 46/54 |
Al-Essa et al. [41] | 1997 | Kuwait | 22 | 31.8 | 13.7 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 31.8/68.2 |
Mokaddas et al. [42] | 1994–1998 | Kuwait | 25 | 56 | 28 | 8 | 8 | - | 10.8 | 56/54.8 |
Mokaddas et al. [8] | 1996–2005 | Kuwait | 607 | 39.5 | 30.6 | 12.4 | 5.6 | 1.6 | 11.8 | 39.5/62 |
Taj-Aldeen et al. [43] | 2004–2010 | Qatar | 201 | 33.8 | 20.8* | 17.9 | 18.9 | - | 8.5 | 33.8/45.3 |
Eliakim-raz et al. [44] | 2007–2014 | Israel | 118** | 44 | 15.2 | 13.5 | 23.7 | 0.8 | 2.54 | 44/55.74 |
Vaezi et al. [45] | until 2015 | Iran | 55 | 27.2 | 30.9 | 14.5 | 18.1 | - | 9 | 27.2/72.5 |
Obaid & Khan [46] | 2014–2016 | Kuwait | 82 | 32 | 32 | 20 | 13 | - | 3.65 | 32/68.65 |
Taj-Aldeen et al. [47] | 2009–2014 | Qatar | 301 | 30.2 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 25.5 | - | 8.3 | 30.2/69.6 |
Present study | 2006–2011 | Kuwait | 970 | 41.75 | 34.2 | 12.98 | 7.8 | 1.54 | - | 41.75/56.52 |
2012–2017 | 1105 | 32.8 | 40.72 | 13.57 | 10.4 | 1.44 | - | 32.8/66.13 |
*Includes 8 isolates of C. orthopsilosis;
**Includes population of >18 years; United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Our data of antifungal susceptibility suggest that resistance is still uncommon (<5%) but it is beginning to emerge against fluconazole particularly in C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. The comparison of MIC data clearly demonstrates that there is a noticeable increase in fluconazole MICs of C. albicans as well as of C. parapsilosis among the isolates obtained during 2012–2017 as compared to 2006–2011. The first fluconazole-resistant C. albicans isolate from blood was detected in March 2011. Subsequently, the number of resistant isolates recorded during 2006–2011 and 2012–2017 increased to three (0.8%) and five (1.37%), respectively. The reduction in fluconazole susceptibility was also reflected by MIC distribution. At an ECV of ≤0.5 μg/ml, 260 of 371 (70.1%) C. albicans isolates obtained during 2006–2011 were wild-type for fluconazole as compared to 211 of 363 (58.1%) isolates during 2012–2017. Emergence of fluconazole resistance was more conspicuous and statistically significant among C. parapsilosis isolates, where 21 (4.7%) of the isolates were found to be resistant to this drug during 2012–2017. This trend was also supported by the fact that at an ECV of ≤2 μg/ml, 304 of 310 (98.0%) isolates obtained during 2006–2011 were wild-type for fluconazole as compared to 93.4% (417 of 446) during 2012–2017 (Table 5). Notably, none of our fluconazole-resistant isolate came from a neonate. The first fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolate of C. parapsilosis was detected in April 2010 and gradually resistant strains have spread to other hospitals. In a study of 442 C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates, 5 of 11 (45%) fluconazole-resistant isolates had Y132F mutation in ERG11 and originated from a single hospital [56]. Four of these isolates came from blood and one from sputum. It is not known if these patients had fluconazole exposure prior to developing resistance. Since two of the patients were females, it is possible that they might have used fluconazole for vaginal symptoms. In a previous study, Grossman et al. (2015) [57] reported two mechanisms that contribute to fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis, that is by an amino acid substitution in ERG11 gene and by overexpression of the efflux pump MDR1, possibly due to point mutations in the MRR1 transcription factor that regulates MDR1. Although there is no clear evidence that prior exposure to fluconazole can be linked to emergence of resistance [51, 58], nonetheless, reports of outbreak of candidemia caused by resistant strain following prolonged antifungal therapy have begun to emerge [59, 60], thus limiting treatment of choice to amphotericin B or an echinocandin, although the latter drug is relatively less active but still therapeutically used against C. parapsilosis candidemia. Our data seem to suggest that C. parapsilosis may have a greater propensity to develop acquired resistance to azoles than C. albicans or C. tropicalis. The report highlights the need of strict compliance of hand sepsis protocols to prevent transmission of fluconazole-resistant strains of C. parapsilosis through healthcare staff. It is worth mentioning that in a recent study, 11 (52%) of 21 fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates came from a single hospital and belonged to a single clone (unpublished data).
In most of the published studies resistance to fluconazole has been <10% with few exceptions [24]. In a study from Spain, a high rate of fluconazole resistance (27.6%) has been observed among Candida isolates obtained from hematology and oncology patients [50]. Similarly, among C. parapsilosis isolates from South Africa, only 37% were found susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole and 44% of fluconazole-resistant isolates also showed cross-resistance to voriconazole. Unlike higher rates of fluconazole resistance among C. tropicalis isolates in China [62, 63] and Australia [48], it was uncommon/rare (0.38%) in Kuwait. In India, also where C. tropicalis has emerged as the most common bloodstream pathogen (n = 382; 41.6%), resistance to fluconazole was uncommon (2.6%) and same is true in the Asia Pacific region [63]. C. glabrata is known to be intrinsically less susceptible to fluconazole, however, there was an indication that this species is also becoming less susceptible to this drug. Of 74 C. glabrata isolates tested during 2006–2011, 10.8% isolates were inhibited at MICs of 32 μg/ml or more as compared to 22.6% (n = 115) tested during 2012–2017 and resistance to fluconazole was restricted to only 12%. In Kuwait, caspofungin is in clinical use for several years. However, none of the Candida species isolates developed resistance to caspofungin, so far.
Our study has two major limitations, firstly, because of retrospective nature, clinical details of the patients including antifungal treatment received are not available, and secondly, it is possible that not all Candida species isolates from candidemia cases were referred for identification and antifungal susceptibility testing to MRL by different hospitals.
In conclusion, our data indicate that during the two study periods there is a shift of 8.8% in favor of non-albicans Candida species causing candidemia in Kuwait. Additionally, our antifungal susceptibility data suggest a gradual decrease in susceptibility to fluconazole, particularly among C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, which may be a prelude of emergence of greater number of resistant strains in future. While resistance to fluconazole and other antifungal agents is still uncommon, it calls for a continued need of surveillance and strengthening of antifungal stewardship policies to minimize acquisition of acquired resistance.
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to clinical microbiologists and supporting staff of different hospitals for sending us bloodstream Candida isolates and the technical support provided by the Ministry of Health, Kuwait.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding Statement
Authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Guinea J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 6:5–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu PF, Liu WL, Hsieh MH, Hii IM, Lee YL, Lin YT, Ho MW, Liu CE, Chen YH, Wang FD. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of candidemia isolates of non-albicans Candida species from cancer patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017;6(10):e87 10.1038/emi.2017.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McCarty TP, Pappas PG. Invasive candidiasis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016; 30(1):103–24. 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pfaller MA, Andes DR, Diekema DJ et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans species of Candida in 2,496 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy (PATH) registry 2004–2008. PLoS One 2014; 9: e101510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Quindós G. Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2014; 31:42–48. 10.1016/j.riam.2013.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Astvad KMT, Johansen HK, Røder BL, Rosenvinge FS, Knudsen JD, Lemming L, Schønheyder HC, Hare RK, Kristensen L, Nielsen L, Gertsen JB, Dzajic E, Pedersen M, Østergård C, Olesen B, Søndergaard TS, Arendrup MC. Update from a 12-Year Nationwide fungemia surveillance: increasing intrinsic and acquired resistance causes concern. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56. pii: e01564-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tan BH, Chakrabarti A, Li RY, Patel AK, Watcharananan SP, Liu Z, Chindamporn A, Tan AL, Sun PL, Wu UI, Chen YC; Asia Fungal Working Group (AFWG). Incidence and species distribution of candidaemia in Asia: a laboratory-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21: 946–53. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mokaddas EM, Al-Sweih NA, Khan ZU. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida bloodstream isolates in Kuwait: a 10-year study. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56(Pt 2):255–259. 10.1099/jmm.0.46817-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Khan ZU, Al-Sweih NA, Ahmad S, Al-Kazemi N, Khan S, Joseph L, Chandy R. Outbreak of fungemia among neonates caused by Candida haemulonii resistant to amphotericin B, itraconazole, and fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45: 2025–2027. 10.1128/JCM.00222-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khan Z, Ahmad S, Joseph L, Chandy R. Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen. PLoS One. 2012;7: e32952 10.1371/journal.pone.0032952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Al-Haqqan A, Al-Sweih N, Ahmad S, Khan S, Joseph L, Varghese S, Khan Z. Azole-resistant Candida blankii as a newly recognized cause of bloodstream infection. New Microbes New Infect. 2018; 26:25–29. 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al-Sweih N, Khan Z, Khan S, Devarajan LV. Neonatal candidaemia in Kuwait: a 12-year study of risk factors, species spectrum and antifungal susceptibility. Mycoses. 2009;52(6):518–23. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01637.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Al-Sweih N, Ahmad S, Joseph L, Khan S, Vayalil S, Chandy R, Khan Z. Candida fermentati as a cause of persistent fungemia in a preterm neonate successfully treated by combination therapy with amphotericin B and caspofungin. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53:1038–41. 10.1128/JCM.03351-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Al-Sweih N, Ahmad S, Khan S, Khan Z, Joseph L, Vayalil S, Chandy R. Persistent Candida conglobata bloodstream infection in a preterm neonate successfully treated by combination therapy with amphotericin B and caspofungin. J Mycol Med. 2017;27:271–276. 10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Al-Sweih N, Ahmad S, Khan S, Joseph L, Asadzadeh M, Khan Z. Cyberlindnera fabianii fungaemia outbreak in preterm neonates in Kuwait and literature review. Mycoses. 2019; 62:51–61. 10.1111/myc.12846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ahmad S, Khan Z, Mustafa AS, Khan ZU. Seminested PCR for diagnosis of candidemia: comparison with culture, antigen detection, and biochemical methods for species identification. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 2483–2489. 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2483-2489.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khan ZU, Ahmad S, Hagen F, Fell JW, Kowshik T, Chandy R, Boekhout T. Cryptococcus randhawai sp. nov., a novel anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast isolated from tree trunk hollow of Ficus religiosa (peepal tree) from New Delhi, India. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010; 97: 253–259. 10.1007/s10482-009-9406-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Asadzadeh M, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Khan ZU Rapid molecular differentiation and genotypic heterogeneity among Candida parapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis strains isolated from clinical specimens in Kuwait. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58 (Pt 6):745–52. 10.1099/jmm.0.008235-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Asadzadeh M, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Gulati RR, Khan Z. First isolation of Candida metapsilosis in Kuwait, an emerging global opportunistic pathogen. J Mycol Med. 2016;26:46–50. 10.1016/j.mycmed.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jamal WY, Ahmad S, Khan ZU, Rotimi VO. Comparative evaluation of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of clinically significant yeasts. Int J Infect Dis. 2014. September;26:167–70. 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.05.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.CLSI. Performance Standards for Antifungal. Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. 1st Edition, CLSI supplement M60, Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lass-Flörl C, Arendrup MC, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M, Donnelly P, Hope W; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing. EUCAST technical note on Amphotericin B. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(12): E27–29. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03644.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(9):2846–2856 10.1128/JCM.00937-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lamoth F, Lockhart SR, Berkow EL, Calandra T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J Antimichrob Chemother 2018;73 (suppl 1):i4–i13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cleveland AA, Harrison LH, Farley MM et al. Declining incidence of candidemia and the shifting epidemiology of Candida resistance in two US metropolitan areas, 2008–2013: results from a population-based surveillance. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0120452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doi AM, Pignatari AC, Edmond MB, Marra AR, Camargo LF, Siqueira RA, da Mota VP, Colombo AL. Epidemiology and microbiologic characterization of nosocomial candidemia from a Brazilian National Surveillance Program. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0146909 10.1371/journal.pone.0146909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rodriguez L, Bustamante B, Huaroto L, Agurto C, Illescas R, Ramirez R, Diaz A, Hidalgo J. A multi-centric Study of Candida bloodstream infection in Lima-Callao, Peru: Species distribution, antifungal resistance and clinical outcomes. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0175172 10.1371/journal.pone.0175172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nucci M, Queiroz-Telles F, Alvarado-Matute T Tiraboschi IN, Cortes J, Zurita J, Guzman-Blanco M, Santolaya ME, Thompson L, Sifuentes-Osornio J, Echevarria JI, Colombo AL; Latin American Invasive Mycosis Network. Epidemiology of candidemia in Latin America: a laboratory-based study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59373 10.1371/journal.pone.0059373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lockhart SR, Iqbal N, Ahlquist AM et al. Species identification and antifungal susceptibility of Candida bloodstream isolates from population-based surveillance in two US cities: 2008–2011. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50: 3435–3442. 10.1128/JCM.01283-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Delfino D. et al. Potential association of specific Candida parapsilosis genotypes, bloodstream infections and colonization of health workers’ hands. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 2014, O946–O951. 10.1111/1469-0691.12685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen S, Slavin M, Nguyen Q, Marriott D, Playford EG, Ellis D, Sorrell T; Australian candidemia study. Active surveillance for candidaemia, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12: 1508–1516. 10.3201/eid1210.060389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jung DS, Farmakiotis D, Jiang Y, Tarrand JJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Uncommon Candida Species Fungemia among Cancer Patients, Houston, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(11):1942–50. 10.3201/eid2111.150404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsai MH, Hsu JF, Yang LY, Pan YB, Lai MY, Chu SM, Huang HR, Chiang MC, Fu RH, Lu JJ. Candidemia due to uncommon Candida species in children: new threat and impacts on outcomes. Sci Rep. 2018. October 15;8(1):15239 10.1038/s41598-018-33662-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jeffery-Smith A, Taori SK, Schelenz S, Jeffery K, Johnson EM, Borman A, Candida auris Incident Management Team , Manuel R, Brown CS. Candida auris: a review of the Literature. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;31. pii: e00029-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khan Z, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Joseph L, Alfouzan W, Asadzadeh M. Increasing prevalence, molecular characterization and antifungal drug susceptibility of serial Candida auris isolates in Kuwait. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0195743 10.1371/journal.pone.0195743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rennert G, Rennert HS, Pitlik S, Finkelstein R, Kitzes-Cohen R. Epidemiology of candidemia—a nationwide survey in Israel. Infection. 2000;28:26–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bukharie HA. Nosocomial candidemia in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Mycopathologia. 2002;153:195–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ellis M, Hedstrom U, Jumaa P, Bener A. Epidemiology, presentation, management and outcome of candidemia in a tertiary care teaching hospital in the United Arab Emirates, 1995-2001.Med Mycol. 2003;41:521–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Al-Jasser AM, Elkhizzi NA. Distribution of Candida species among bloodstream isolates. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:566–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Osoba AO, Al-Mowallad AW, McAlear DE, Hussein BA. Candidemia and the susceptibility pattern of Candida isolates in blood. Saudi Med J. 2003;24:1060–1063. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Al-Essa M. Khan Z. Rashwan N. Kazi A. Pattern of candidiasis in the newborn: A Study from Kuwait. Med Principles Pract 2000; 9:174–180. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mokaddas EM, Ramadan SA, Abo el Maaty SH, Sanyal SC. Candidemia in pediatric surgery patients. J Chemother. 2000; 12:332–338. 10.1179/joc.2000.12.4.332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Taj-Aldeen SJ, Kolecka A, Boesten R, Alolaqi A, Almaslamani M, Chandra P, Meis JF, Boekhout T. Epidemiology of candidemia in Qatar, the Middle East: performance of MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of Candida species, species distribution, outcome, and susceptibility pattern. Infection. 2014; 42:393–404 10.1007/s15010-013-0570-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eliakim-Raz N, Babaoff R, Yahav D, Yanai S, Shaked H, Bishara J. Epidemiology, microbiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of candidemia in internal medicine wards-a retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;52:49–54. 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vaezi A, Fakhim H, Khodavaisy S, Alizadeh A, Nazeri M, Soleimani A, Boekhout T, Badali H. Epidemiological and mycological characteristics of candidemia in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Mycol Med. 2017;27:146–152. 10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alobaid K Khan Z. Epidemiologic characteristics of adult candidemic patients in a secondary hospital in Kuwait: A retrospective study. J Mycol Med. 2018. pii: S1156-5233(18)30093-3. 10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.12.001 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Taj-Aldeen SJ, Salah H, Perez WB, Almaslamani M, Motyl M, AbdulWahab A, Healey KR, Perlin DS. Molecular Analysis of Resistance and Detection of Non-Wild-Type Strains Using Etest Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Amphotericin B and Echinocandins for Bloodstream Candida Infections from a Tertiary Hospital in Qatar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018. August 27;62(9). pii: e00214–18 10.1128/AAC.00214-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chapman B, Slavin M, Marriott D, Halliday C, Kidd S, Arthur I, Bak N, Heath CH, Kennedy K, Morrissey CO, Sorrell TC, van Hal S, Keighley C, Goeman E, Underwood N, Hajkowicz K, Hofmeyr A, Leung M, Macesic N, Botes J, Blyth C, Cooley L, George CR, Kalukottege P, Kesson A, McMullan B, Baird R, Robson J, Korman TM, Pendle S, Weeks K, Liu E, Cheong E, Chen S; Australian and New Zealand Mycoses Interest Group. Changing epidemiology of candidaemia in Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72: 1103–1108. 10.1093/jac/dkw422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Trouvé C, Blot S, Hayette MP, Jonckheere S, Patteet S, Rodriguez-Villalobos H, Symoens F, Van Wijngaerden E, Lagrou K. Epidemiology and reporting of candidaemia in Belgium: a multi-centre study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017. April;36(4):649–655. 10.1007/s10096-016-2841-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Puig-Asensio M, Padilla B, Garnacho-Montero J, Zaragoza O, Aguado JM, Zaragoza R, Montejo M, Muñoz P, Ruiz-Camps I, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almirante B; CANDIPOP Project; GEIH-GEMICOMED (SEIMC); REIPI. Epidemiology and predictive factors for early and latemortality in Candida bloodstream infections: a population-based surveillance in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20: O245–254. 10.1111/1469-0691.12380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Govender NP, Patel J, Magobo RE, Naicker S, Wadula J, Whitelaw A, Coovadia Y, Kularatne R, Govind C, Lockhart SR, Zietsman IL; TRAC-South Africa group. Emergence of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis causing bloodstream infection: results from laboratory-based sentinel surveillance in South Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(7):1994–2004. 10.1093/jac/dkw091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xiao M, Sun ZY, Kang M, Guo DW, Liao K, Chen SC, Kong F, Fan X, Cheng JW, Hou X, Zhou ML, Li Y, Yu SY, Huang JJ, Wang H, Xu YC; China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) Study Group. Five-Year National Surveillance of Invasive Candidiasis: Species Distribution and Azole Susceptibility from the China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) Study. J Clin Microbiol. 2018; 56. pii: e00577-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tan TY, Hsu LY, Alejandria MM, Chaiwarith R, Chinniah T, Chayakulkeeree M, Choudhury S, Chen YH, Shin JH, Kiratisin P, Mendoza M, Prabhu K, Supparatpinyo K, Tan AL, Phan XT, Tran TT, Nguyen GB, Doan MP, Huynh VA, Nguyen SM, Tran TB, Van Pham H. Antifungal susceptibility of invasive Candida bloodstream isolates from the Asia-Pacific region.Med Mycol. 2016;54:471–477. 10.1093/mmy/myv114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chakrabarti A, Sood P, Rudramurthy SM, Chen S, Kaur H, Capoor M, Chhina D, Rao R, Eshwara VK, Xess I, Kindo AJ, Umabala P, Savio J, Patel A, Ray U, Mohan S, Iyer R, Chander J, Arora A, Sardana R, Roy I, Appalaraju B, Sharma A, Shetty A, Khanna N, Marak R, Biswas S, Das S, Harish BN, Joshi S, Mendiratta D. Incidence, characteristics and outcome of ICU-acquired candidemia in India. Intensive Care Med. 2015: 10.1007/s00134-014-3603-2 Epub 2014 Dec 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Farooqi JQ, Jabeen K, Saeed N, Iqbal N, Malik B, Lockhart SR, Zafar A, Brandt ME, Hasan R. Invasive candidiasis in Pakistan: clinical characteristics, species distribution and antifungal susceptibility. J Med Microbiol 2013; 62: 259–68. 10.1099/jmm.0.048785-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Asadzadeh M, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Khan Z. Epidemiology and molecular basis of resistance to fluconazole among clinical Candida parapsilosis Isolates in Kuwait. Microb Drug Resist. 2017; 23:966–972. 10.1089/mdr.2016.0336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Grossman NT, Pham CD, Cleveland AA, Lockhart SR.Molecular mechanisms of fluconazole resistance in Candida parapsilosis isolates from a U.S. surveillance system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1030–1037. 10.1128/AAC.04613-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Naicker SD, Govender N, Patel J, Zietsman IL, Wadula J, Coovadia Y, Kularatne R, Seetharam S, Govender NP; TRAC-SA group. Comparison of species-level identification and antifungal susceptibility results from diagnostic and reference laboratories for bloodstream Candida surveillance isolates, South Africa, 2009–2010. Med Mycol. 2016;54:816–824 10.1093/mmy/myw046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang L, Xiao M, Watts MR, Wang H, Fan X, Kong F, Xu YC. Development of fluconazole resistance in a series of Candida parapsilosis isolates from a persistent candidemia patient with prolonged antifungal therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:340 10.1186/s12879-015-1086-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pinhati HM, Casulari LA, Souza AC, Siqueira RA, Damasceno CM, Colombo AL. Outbreak of candidemia caused by fluconazole resistant Candida parapsilosis strains in an intensive care unit. BMC Infect Dis. 2016. August 20;16(1):433 10.1186/s12879-016-1767-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Guo LN, Xiao M, Cao B, Qu F, Zhan YL, Hu YJ, Wang XR, Liang GW, Gu HT, Qi J, Yuan H, Min R, Wang FY, Liu LJ, Wang HB, Jiang W, Duan XG, Xu WJ, Yu YH, Su JR, Zhang JZ, Nong JQ, Liu SM, Li J, Liu JT, Yue ZG, Yang D, Guo J, Zhao R, Zhang YN, Yang XM, Liu XQ, Hsueh PR, Xu YC. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibilities of yeast isolates causing invasive infections across urban Beijing, China. Future Microbiol. 2017;12: 1075–1086. 10.2217/fmb-2017-0036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fan X, Xiao M, Zhang D, Huang JJ, Wang H, Hou X, Zhang L, Kong F, Chen SC, Tong ZH, Xu Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida tropicalis isolates causing invasive candidiasis in China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. November 22. pii: S1198-743X (18)30734-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang H, Xu YC, Hsueh PR. Epidemiology of candidemia and antifungal susceptibility in invasive Candida species in the Asia-Pacific region. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:1461–1477. 10.2217/fmb-2016-0099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript.