Skip to main content
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews logoLink to The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
. 2018 May 23;2018(5):CD006698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006698.pub3

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1‐ versus 2‐stage implant placement

Marco Esposito 1,, Maria Gabriella Grusovin 2, Yun Shane Chew 3, Paul Coulthard 4, Helen V Worthington 1
Editor: Cochrane Oral Health Group
PMCID: PMC6494529  PMID: 29791009

Reason for withdrawal from publication

This review derives from the original review 'Interventions for replacing missing teeth: surgical techniques for placing dental implants'. At the time only one eligible randomised controlled trial (RCT) (Barber 1996) was identified but was excluded. The same RCT is now included.

Cochrane Oral Health withdrew this review as of Issue 5, 2018. Authors are unable to update the review. The review is substantially out‐of‐date and does not meet current Cochrane methodological and reporting standards, but is correct at the date of publication. The review has been withdrawn from the Cochrane Library, but readers can still access previous versions in the 'Other versions' tab.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

What's new

Date Event Description
23 May 2018 Amended Cochrane Oral Health withdrew this review as of Issue 5, 2018. Authors are unable to update the review. The review is substantially out‐of‐date and does not meet current Cochrane methodological and reporting standards, but is correct at the date of publication. The review has been withdrawn from the Cochrane Library, but readers can still access previous versions in the 'Other versions' tab.

History

Protocol first published: Issue 3, 2007
 Review first published: Issue 3, 2007

Date Event Description
17 September 2009 Amended Minor edit.
9 March 2009 New citation required but conclusions have not changed Change of review authors. 3 new included studies.
9 March 2009 New search has been performed New searches: January 2009.
12 June 2008 Amended Converted to new review format.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • The University of Manchester, UK.

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    This project was supported by the NIHR, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to Cochrane Oral Health. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the review authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health.

Withdrawn from publication for reasons stated in the review


Articles from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES