Amphotericin B (AmB) is characterized by a broad spectrum of antifungal efficacy and is an essential compound in the antifungal armamentarium. However, the clinical utility of AmB has been restricted by dose-limiting and potentially fatal nephrotoxicity. During the past 4 decades, major advances have been achieved in the development of lipid formulations of AmB, with the key objective of attenuating its nephrotoxicity. Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB; AmBisome) has emerged as the most widely used agent of the licensed lipid formulations of AmB for the treatment of invasive fungal infections [1–3]. For the purpose of this article, the term “LAmB” refers exclusively to AmBisome.
During a recent meeting of the authors, organized by Gilead to discuss the recent advances and unmet needs in the use of LAmB, a decision was made by the authors to provide a definitive review of this important compound. Written by distinguished experts in antifungal drug development, medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, medical mycology, immunopharmacology, infectious diseases, and hematology/oncology, this supplement consists of 2 important articles on the preclinical and clinical safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of LAmB [4, 5]. The two articles (Adler-Moore et al [4] and Groll et al [5]) presented in this supplement of Clinical Infectious Diseases provide an unprecedented, comprehensive body of knowledge on the mechanisms of action, toxicology, pharmacology, and efficacy of this important antifungal agent.
PRECLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
The first article by Adler-Moore et al on preclinical pharmacology and therapeutics begins with a review of the mechanisms of antifungal activity of AmB [4]. The review discusses AmB’s interaction with ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane to form subunit oligomers of membrane-permeabilizing ion channels that promote leakage of intracellular K+ and Mg++ ions with a reciprocal influx of Na+ and Ca++ ions, resulting in a potentially lethal effect on fungal cellular viability [6–8], as well as other mechanisms of action. The authors then provide an in-depth review of recent data exploring how the binding affinity of liposomes for fungal cell walls contributes to the capacity of LAmB to traverse the cell wall and bind with cell membrane ergosterol in the targeted fungus [9, 10].
TOXICOLOGY
Adler-Moore et al then discuss how the reduction in drug-induced nephrotoxicity through the use of LAmB has been an important advance in antifungal therapy [11]. LAmB attenuates nephrotoxicity due to the presence of cholesterol within the liposome bilayer that binds to AmB, thus permitting AmB to remain associated within the liposome rather than interacting with renal tubular epithelial cells [12]. The authors continue with a review of the results in predictive animal models that have demonstrated this reduced nephrotoxicity compared with that of deoxycholate amphotericin B (DAmB) [13–15], as well as randomized clinical trials that have since demonstrated significant reductions in nephrotoxicity, particularly glomerular injury with LAmB compared with DAmB [16–18]. The authors discuss the mechanisms of infusion-related toxicity (IRT) associated with LAmB, the frequency and severity of which are also considerably reduced compared with IRT associated with DAmB [16]. The authors also elaborate on a distinctive severe acute infusion-related reaction associated with LAmB and classified as a unique type 1 hypersensitivity reaction termed “complement activation-related pseudoallergy” [19].
Adler-Moore et al continue with a review of the preclinical studies of LAmB in the treatment of different fungal infections including pulmonary aspergillosis [13], cryptococcal meningitis [20], central nervous system aspergillosis [21], Candida meningoencephalitis [22], mucormycosis [23, 24], and coccidioidal meningitis [25]. The authors discuss the pharmacodynamic effects of DAmB and LAmB in several different animal model systems as being principally determined by the Cmax/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio [26–28].
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
In the second article, Groll et al [5] initially review the PK studies of LAmB in healthy adult volunteers, as well as adult and pediatric patients [29–33]. The authors then review the clinical studies of the efficacy of LAmB against candidiasis [34–37], aspergillosis [38], cryptococcosis [39, 40], histoplasmosis [18], mucormycosis [41, 42], and other less common, deeply invasive mycoses, such as fusariosis [43]. The review delineates the role of LAmB in early treatment and preventive strategies of empirical antifungal therapy [17, 44] and prophylaxis [45, 46] in high-risk patient populations.
When considering future directions, both articles underscore the need for new dosing strategies of LAmB for the treatment and prevention of invasive fungal infections that are based on predictive preclinical and sound clinical PK data for invasive mycoses, particularly infections with emerging triazole-resistant pathogens.
Notes
Acknowledgments.This supplement was made possible by funding from Gilead Sciences; however, Gilead had no input into the content. Editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Christine Drewienkiewicz of OPEN Health Medical Communications (London, United Kingdom) and was funded by Gilead. T. J. W. was supported as a Scholar of the Henry Schueler Foundation for his work on this manuscript.
Disclaimer.The views, opinions, assumptions, or any other information set out in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be attributed to the funders or any person connected with the funders. Liposomal amphotericin B is not approved for prophylaxis.
Financial support.This work was supported by Gilead Sciences.
Supplement sponsorship.
Potential conflicts of interest.T. J. W. has received grants for his institution from Amplyx, Astellas Pharma, Merck, SCYNEXIS, Allergan, Medicines Company, Leadiant Biosciences, and Tetraphase and has received honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Merck, SCYNEXIS, Allergan, Medicines Company, Gilead Sciences, and Lediant Biosciences. R. E. L. has received grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences and Merck. J. A.-M. has received grants, honoraria, and nonfinancial support from Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work and was involved in the discovery and development of liposomal amphotericin B by Vestar Inc. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Aversa F, Busca A, Candoni A, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®) at beginning of its third decade of clinical use. J Chemother 2017; 29:131–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bulbake U, Doppalapudi S, Kommineni N, Khan W. Liposomal formulations in clinical use: an updated review. Pharmaceutics 2017; 9:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Stone NR, Bicanic T, Salim R, Hope W. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®): a review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical experience and future directions. Drugs 2016; 76:485–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Adler Moore J. Preclinical safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antifungal activity of liposomal amphotericin B. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68(S4):S244–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Groll AH, Rijnders BJA, Walsh TJ, Adler Moore J, Lewis Russell E, Brüggemann RJM. Clinical safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68(S4):S260–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cass A, Finkelstein A, Krespi V. The ion permeability induced in thin lipid membranes by the polyene antibiotics nystatin and amphotericin B. J Gen Physiol 1970; 56:100–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grudzinski W, Sagan J, Welc R, Luchowski R, Gruszecki WI. Molecular organization, localization and orientation of antifungal antibiotic amphotericin B in a single lipid bilayer. Sci Rep 2016; 6:32780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Starzyk J, Gruszecki M, Tutaj K, et al. Self-association of amphotericin B: spontaneous formation of molecular structures responsible for the toxic side effects of the antibiotic. J Phys Chem B 2014; 118:13821–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Adler-Moore J, Proffitt RT. AmBisome: liposomal formulation, structure, mechanism of action and pre-clinical experience. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 49(Suppl 1):21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Walker L, Sood P, Lenardon MD, et al. The viscoelastic properties of the fungal cell wall allow traffic of AmBisome as intact liposome vesicles. MBio 2018; 9:e02383–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Loo AS, Muhsin SA, Walsh TJ. Toxicokinetic and mechanistic basis for the safety and tolerability of liposomal amphotericin B. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2013; 12:881–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Readio JD, Bittman R. Equilibrium binding of amphotericin B and its methyl ester and borate complex to sterols. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982; 685:219–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Francis P, Lee JW, Hoffman A, et al. Efficacy of unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B in treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently granulocytopenic rabbits: the potential role of bronchoalveolar D-mannitol and serum galactomannan as markers of infection. J Infect Dis 1994; 169:356–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bekersky I, Boswell GW, Hiles R, Fielding RM, Buell D, Walsh TJ. Safety, toxicokinetics and tissue distribution of long-term intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome): a 91-day study in rats. Pharm Res 2000; 17:1494–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bekersky I, Boswell GW, Hiles R, Fielding RM, Buell D, Walsh TJ. Safety and toxicokinetics of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in beagle dogs. Pharm Res 1999; 16:1694–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:764–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Prentice HG, Hann IM, Herbrecht R, et al. A randomized comparison of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B for the treatment of pyrexia of unknown origin in neutropenic patients. Br J Haematol 1997; 98:711–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Johnson PC, Wheat LJ, Cloud GA, et al. ; U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B compared with conventional amphotericin B for induction therapy of histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:105–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Roden MM, Nelson LD, Knudsen TA, et al. Triad of acute infusion-related reactions associated with liposomal amphotericin B: analysis of clinical and epidemiological characteristics. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:1213–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Albert MM, Stahl-Carroll TL, Luther MF, Graybill JR. Comparison of liposomal amphotericin B to amphotericin B for treatment of murine cryptococcal meningitis. J Mycol Med 1995; 5:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Clemons KV, Stevens DA. The contribution of animal models of aspergillosis to understanding pathogenesis, therapy and virulence. Med Mycol 2005; 43(Suppl 1):S101–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Groll AH, Giri N, Petraitis V, et al. Comparative efficacy and distribution of lipid formulations of amphotericin B in experimental Candida albicans infection of the central nervous system. J Infect Dis 2000; 182:274–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Luo G, Gebremariam T, Lee H, et al. Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and posaconazole in intratracheal models of murine mucormycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57:3340–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lewis RE, Lortholary O, Spellberg B, Roilides E, Kontoyiannis DP, Walsh TJ. How does antifungal pharmacology differ for mucormycosis versus aspergillosis? Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54(Suppl 1):S67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Clemons KV, Sobel RA, Williams PL, Pappagianis D, Stevens DA. Efficacy of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) against coccidioidal meningitis in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:2420–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Groll AH, Piscitelli SC, Walsh TJ. Antifungal pharmacodynamics: concentration-effect relationships in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 133–48S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wiederhold NP, Tam VH, Chi J, Prince RA, Kontoyiannis DP, Lewis RE. Pharmacodynamic activity of amphotericin B deoxycholate is associated with peak plasma concentrations in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:469–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Andes D, Safdar N, Marchillo K, Conklin R. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison of amphotericin B (AMB) and two lipid-associated AMB preparations, liposomal AMB and AMB lipid complex, in murine candidiasis models. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:674–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Walsh TJ, Yeldandi V, McEvoy M, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a small unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in neutropenic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42:2391–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Walsh TJ, Goodman JL, Pappas P, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in patients infected with Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi: maximum tolerated dose study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45:3487–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bekersky I, Fielding RM, Dressler DE, Kline S, Buell DN, Walsh TJ. Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of 14C after administration of 14C-cholesterol-labeled AmBisome to healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 41:963–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bekersky I, Fielding RM, Dressler DE, Lee JW, Buell DN, Walsh TJ. Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:828–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hong Y, Shaw PJ, Nath CE, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B in pediatric patients with malignant diseases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:935–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Würthwein G, Young C, Lanvers-Kaminsky C, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56:536–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Juster-Reicher A, Leibovitz E, Linder N, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in the treatment of neonatal candidiasis in very low birth weight infants. Infection 2000; 28:223–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kuse ER, Chetchotisakd P, da Cunha CA, et al. ; Micafungin Invasive Candidiasis Working Group Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2007; 369:1519–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Arrieta AC, Shea K, Dhar V, et al. Once-weekly liposomal amphotericin B as Candida prophylaxis in very low birth weight premature infants: a prospective, randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled pilot study. Clin Ther 2010; 32:265–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cornely OA, Maertens J, Bresnik M, et al. ; AmBiLoad Trial Study Group Liposomal amphotericin B as initial therapy for invasive mold infection: a randomized trial comparing a high-loading dose regimen with standard dosing (AmBiLoad Trial). Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:1289–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Leenders AC, Reiss P, Portegies P, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) compared with amphotericin B both followed by oral fluconazole in the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. AIDS 1997; 11:1463–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:291–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, et al. The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) Study: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67:715–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lanternier F, Poiree S, Elie C, et al. ; French Mycosis Study Group Prospective pilot study of high-dose (10 mg/kg/day) liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) for the initial treatment of mucormycosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70:3116–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Nucci F, Nouér SA, Capone D, Anaissie E, Nucci M. Fusariosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 36:706–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, et al. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1391–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Tollemar J, Ringdén O, Andersson S, et al. Prophylactic use of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) against fungal infections: a randomized trial in bone marrow transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1993; 25:1495–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kelsey SM, Goldman JM, McCann S, et al. Liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23:163–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
