Skip to main content
Cell Proliferation logoLink to Cell Proliferation
. 2011 Sep 22;44(5):420–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00769.x

Dose‐specific effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

H Huang 1,2,, N Zhao 1,3,, X Xu 2, Y Xu 4, S Li 5, J Zhang 3, P Yang 1
PMCID: PMC6495272  PMID: 21951285

Abstract

Objectives:  To investigate tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α)‐induced changes in osteogenic differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).

Materials and methods:  Blockade of nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) was achieved in ST2 murine MSCs via overexpression of the NF‐κB inhibitor, IκBα. Osteogenic differentiation was induced in IκBα‐overexpressing ST2 cells and normal ST2 cells when these cells were treated with TNF‐α at various concentrations. Expression levels of bone marker genes were determined using real time RT‐PCR and ALP activity assay. In vitro mineralization was performed to determine long‐term exposure to TNF‐α on mineral nodule formation. MTT assay was used to determine the changes in cell proliferation/survival.

Results:  Levels of Runx2, Osx, OC and ALP were up‐regulated in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at lower concentrations, while down‐regulated in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at higher concentrations. Blockade of NF‐κB signaling reversed the inhibitory effect observed in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at higher concentrations, but showed no effect on cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at lower concentrations. In contrast, long‐term treatment of TNF‐α at all concentrations induced inhibitory effects on in vitro mineral nodule formation. MTT assay showed that TNF‐α inhibits proliferation/survival of mesenchymal stem cells when the NF‐κB signaling pathway is blocked.

Conclusions:  The binding of TNF‐α to its receptors results in the activation of multiple signaling pathways, which actively interact with each other to regulate the differentiation, proliferation, survival and apoptosis of MSCs.

Introduction

As the most common oral epidemics in adults, periodontal diseases are characterized by a specific inflammatory response to microbial residents of the subgingival biofilm, destroy tooth supporting alveolar bones, and yield tooth loosening and eventual tooth loss (1). Although it has been widely accepted that the plaque bacteria are the initial and necessary factor of periodontal diseases, emerging evidence has suggested that the inflammatory response of the host accounts for the majority of the hard‐ and soft‐tissue damage observed in patients suffering from periodontal diseases (2). Therefore, it is of particular significance to thoroughly investigate the exact roles of host inflammatory responses in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases, which presents the opportunity for developing new strategies for treating periodontal diseases by means of host response modulation (3).

Up till now, considerable research effort has been focused on the regeneration of the damaged periodontal tissues. In the 1980s, progenitor cells for cementum, bone, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts were found in the periodontal ligament tissue, and the regeneration of damaged periodontium can be achieved by the activity of local adult stem cells or progenitor cells found in paravascular locations of the periodontal ligament (4). Using a transgenic mouse model, we found that systemically transplanted bone marrow stromal cells possess the potential to migrate to bone wound sites, differentiate into osteoblast progenitor cells, and participate in bone regeneration in orocraniofacial region (5). However, currently the regeneration of damaged periodontal tissue is still an exclusive goal of periodontal therapy and remains a subject of intense interest to the dentists and dental scientists. In addition, the impact of inflammatory responses observed in the periodontal diseases on the migration, proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is largely unknown.

As the result of the activation of host‐derived immune and inflammatory response to exogenous pathogens, pro‐inflammatory cytokines are produced which significantly amplify the inflammatory response, lead to the production of lytic enzymes and stimulate the production of chemokines (3). Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) is a key pro‐inflammatory cytokine produced upon periodontal inflammatory response (6), which actively participates in osteoclastogenesis and tissue destruction observed in periodontal diseases (7). However, although it has been fully elucidated that TNF‐α potently enhances osteoclastogenesis, the exact role of this cytokine in osteogenic differentiation from the mesenchymal stem cells is still ambiguous. In the murine myoblastic C2C12 cells, TNF‐α suppresses BMP‐2‐induced expressions of runt‐related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and osteocalcin, which is mediated by the activation of NF‐κB signaling pathway (8) and can be reversed by estradiol and dexamethasone treatment (9). The osteogenic differentiation from the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is also suppressed by TNF‐α, which is demonstrated by decreased levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alpha1(I) procollagen, Runx2 and osterix after TNF‐α treatment (10, 11). On the other hand, TNF‐α was shown to stimulate the expression of tissue‐non specific alkaline phosphatase by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which resulted in the trans‐differentiation of VSMCs into osteoblast‐like cells (12). Moreover, continuous delivery of TNF‐α was reported to dose‐dependently stimulate osteogenic differentiation from rat MSCs seeded in 3‐dimentional biodegradable electrospun poly(epsilon‐caprolactone) scaffolds (13).

In this study, ST2 murine mesenchymal stem cells were induced to differentiate towards osteogenic lineage cells when simultaneously treated with TNF‐α at various concentrations. The changes in expression levels of osteogenic transcription factors and bone marker genes were determined to evaluate the effect of TNF‐α on the osteogenic differentiation of these mesenchymal stem cells. The role of NF‐κB signaling pathway in TNF‐α‐mediated changes during osteogenic differentiation was also investigated to provide a novel explanation to the contradictory data from the literature review.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The retroviral packaging cell line PT67 (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and the murine mesenchymal stem cell line ST2 (Riken Bio‐Resource Center, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone), 100 U/ml penicillin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). For osteogenic differentiation, the cells were cultured in α‐MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10−2mβ‐glycerophosphate and 10−4m ascorbic acid as described previously (14).

Production of viral stocks and viral infection

The retroviral vector encoding the mutant form of the NF‐κB inhibitor IκBα (pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut) was purchased from Addgene (plasmid ID: 15291, Cambridge, MA, USA). In this mutant form of IκBα (IκBα‐mut), the alanine residues 32 and 36 are substituted for serine residues 32 and 36, which effectively prevent IκB phosphorylation and degradation, and therefore constitutively prevent NF‐κB activation. Retroviral stocks containing pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut or the empty viral vector pBABE‐puro were prepared as previously stated (15). Briefly, pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut or pBABE‐puro was transfected into PT67 packaging cells using LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogen). Forty‐eight hours after the transfection, the supernatant of the transfected PT67 cells was collected, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter, and stored at −80 °C. The viral titer, 3 × 106 cfu/ml, was determined indirectly using NIH3T3 cells as previously described (15). For cell infection, ST2 cells were seeded on six‐well plates at a cell density of 3 × 103 cells per plate, and incubated with viral stocks containing pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut or pBABE‐puro in the presence of polybrene (8 μg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 8 h. Forty‐eight hours after the infection, the ST2 cells were subjected to puromycin selection (3 μg/ml; Invitrogen) for 2 weeks. Stably transduced cells were used for the following experiments.

Western blot analysis

Whole protein lysates were prepared as described previously (16). Nuclear extracts were purified using a Nuclear Extraction Kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). SDS–PAGE and Western blot analyses were then performed using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis‐Tris gradient gels and 0.45 μm Invitrolon polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Invitrogen) (16). Antibodies for IκBα (1:500), NF‐κB subunit p65 (1:500), Lamin B1 (1:500) and β‐actin (1:500) were purchased from Sigma. The secondary antibodies were horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐linked goat‐anti rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Blots were visualized using ECL chemiluminescence reagents from Pierce Biotechnology (Rockford, IL, USA). Images of blots were analysed using JD801 IMAGE 4.11 program (Dahui Biotechnology, Guangzhou, China).

Real‐time reverse‐transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

The stably transduced ST2 cells were induced to differentiate towards osteoblasts with the aforementioned osteogenic medium, which was supplemented with murine TNF‐α (Peprotech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) at different concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 ng/ml, respectively. Forty‐eight hours after the treatment, the cells were collected and subjected to real‐time RT‐PCR analysis as previously described (15). Briefly, total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini RNA Isolation kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Shenzhen, China). Real‐time PCR was performed using the LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany). The sequences of the primers for amplification of mouse Runx2, osterix (Osx), osteocalcin (OC), ALP and GAPDH were as following: Runx2: 5′‐TGTTCTCTGATCGCCTCAGTG‐3′ and 5′‐CCTGGGATCTGTAATCTGACTCT‐3′; Osx: 5′‐ATGGCGTCCTCTCTGCTTG‐3′ and 5′‐TGAAAGGTCAGCGTATGGCTT‐3′; OC: 5′‐AAGCAGGAGGGCAATAAGGT‐3′ and 5′‐TAGGCGGTCTTCAAGCCAT‐3′; ALP: 5′‐AATGGGCGTCTCCACAGTAAC‐3′ and 5′‐CTGAGTGGTGTTGCATCGC‐3′; and GAPDH: 5′‐TGACCACAGTCCATGCCATC‐3′ and 5′‐GACGGACACATTGGGGGTAG‐3′. The amount of mRNA was calculated for each sample based on the standard curve using the LightCycler Software 4.0 (Roche). GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Alkaline phosphatase activity assay

The infected ST2 cells were seeded on 96‐well plates at a cell density of 2 × 103 cells/well and incubated with the osteogenic medium supplemented with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 ng/ml, respectively. Forty‐eight hours after the treatment, ALP activity was determined in these cells as an early marker of osteogenic differentiation as described previously (17). Briefly, an established colorimetric assay was used based on the rate of the conversion of a colorless substrate, p‐nitrophenyl phosphate disodium salt hexahydrate (Sigma), to a yellow product, p‐nitrophenol. Samples were run in triplicate, and the absorbance at 405 nm was measured.

In vitro mineralization assay

Infected ST2 cells were incubated with the above‐mentioned osteogenic media supplemented with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1 and 100 ng/ml, respectively. Four weeks after the osteogenic induction, in vitro mineralization was monitored using Alizarin red staining as described previously (15). The nodules were photographed with Olympus camera and the area covered with mineral nodules in each well was determined using image analysis system DT2000 software V1.0 (Tansi Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China).

MTT assay

The stably transduced ST2 cells were seeded on 96‐well plates at a cell density of 2 × 103 cells/well and treated with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 ng/ml, respectively. At 24, 48 and 72 h after the TNF‐α treatment, the proliferation/survival of the cells was evaluated using the methylthiazolyldiphenyl‐tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. Briefly, the culture medium was replaced with 5 mg/ml MTT solution (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) in PBS, and the plates were incubated for 5 h at 37 °C. The precipitate was extracted with DMSO (Sigma) and the optical density was measured at the wavelength of 490 nm.

Statistical analysis

Data were shown as means ± SEM from at least three experiments and t‐test was used to test significance using spss 12.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The NF‐κB signaling pathway was successfully inhibited via the overexpression of the NF‐κB antogonist IκBα

The ST2 cells stably transduced with pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut or pBABE‐puro were collected and subjected to western blot analysis to evaluate the cytosolic protein level of IκBα. As shown in Fig. 1A, the protein level of IκBα was increased by 2.8 folds in ST2 cells transduced with pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut when compared with the control ST2 cells (Fig. 1A). As a result, the nuclear protein level of p65, a subunit of NF‐κB, was slightly decreased in ST2 cells stably overexpressing the exogenous IκBα when compared with the control cells (Fig. 1B). After treated with 100 ng/ml TNF‐α, the nuclear protein level of p65 was dramatically increased in the control ST2 cells, while in the TNF‐α‐treated ST2‐pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut cells, the increase in the nuclear protein level of p65 was less prominent (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The NF‐κB signaling pathway was successfully inhibited via the overexpress of NF‐κB antagonist IκBα. Western blot analysis was performed to determine the cytosolic protein level of IκBα and the nuclear protein level of the NF‐κB subunit, p65, in the ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro or pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut. (A) Changes in the cytosolic protein level of IκBα. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, ST2‐pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut cells versus ST2‐pBABE‐puro cells. (B) Changes in the nuclear protein level of p65. a, P <0.05, versus ST2‐pBABE‐puro cells treated without TNF‐α; b, P <0.05, versus ST2‐pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut cells TNF‐α.

Short‐term TNF‐α treatment resulted in dose‐dependent changes in the expression levels of osteogenic transcription factors and bone marker genes during osteogenic differentiation

To investigate the role of TNF‐α in the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, ST2 murine mesenchymal stem cells were induced to differentiate towards osteoblasts and treated with TNF‐α at various concentrations. Interestingly, real time RT‐PCR analysis showed that the mRNA levels of the potent osteogenic transcription factors (Runx2 and Osx) and some bone matrix proteins (OC and ALP) were up‐regulated in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at lower concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml) when compared with cells treated with 0 ng/ml TNF‐α. In contrast, the mRNA levels of Runx2, Osx, OC and ALP were dose‐dependently down‐regulated in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at concentrations above 1 ng/ml (Fig. 2a). Blockade of NF‐κB signaling via the overexpression of the NF‐κB antogonist IκBα only reversed the inhibitory effect observed in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at concentrations higher that 1 ng/ml, while had no impact on the positive changes observed in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at lower concentrations (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of short‐term TNF‐α treatment on osteogenic gene expression in MSCs. ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro (a) or pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut (b) were induced to differentiate towards osteoblasts with the osteogenic medium, which was supplemented with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 or 100 ng/ml. Forty‐eight hours after the treatment, real time RT‐PCR was performed to determine mRNA levels of Runx2, Osx, OC and ALP in these cells. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, versus cells treated with 0 ng/ml TNF‐α.

Similarly, 48‐h treatment of the ST2 cells with TNF‐α at lower concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml) enhanced ALP activity in these cells when compared with the control cells (treated with 0 ng/ml TNF‐α). Cells treated with TNF‐α at higher concentrations (10 and 100 ng/ml) showed decreased ALP activity when compared with the control cells (Fig. 3a). Overexpression of IκBα reversed the down‐regulation of ALP activity by TNF‐α treatment at concentrations of 10 and 100 ng/ml, while failed to induce significant changes in ALP activity of cells treated with TNF‐α at lower concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml) (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of short‐term TNF‐α treatment on ALP activity in MSCs diffentiating towards osteogenic lineage cells. ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro (a) or pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut (b) were induced to differentiate towards osteoblasts with the osteogenic medium, which was supplemented with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 or 100 ng/ml. Forty‐eight hours after the treatment, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was determined using an established colorimetric assay. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, versus cells treated with 0 ng/ml TNF‐α.

No significant difference was detected between ST2‐pBABE‐puro cells and ST2‐pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut cells which were treated without TNF‐α.

Long‐term treatment of TNF‐α mainly induced inhibitory effects on in vitro mineral nodule formation

In vitro mineral nodule formation was induced in ST2 cells infected with pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut or pBABE‐puro using the above‐mentioned osteogenic media for 4 weeks. At the same time, the cells were incubated with TNF‐α at various concentrations for 4 weeks. This long‐term treatment with TNF‐α resulted in a dose‐dependent decrease in mineral nodule formation after the 4‐week osteogenic induction [Fig. 4a (upper panel),b]. The inhibitory effect of TNF‐α on in vitro mineral nodule formation was partially reversed by the blockade of NF‐κB signaling [Fig. 4a (lower panel),c]. No significant difference was detected between ST2‐pBABE‐puro cells and ST2‐pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut cells which were treated without TNF‐α.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Long‐term treatment of TNF‐α mainly induced inhibitory effects on in vitro mineral nodule formation. ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro or pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut were induced to differentiate towards osteoblasts with the osteogenic medium for 4 weeks. During the 4‐week osteogenic induction, the cells were also incubated with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1 or 100 ng/ml. Four weeks after the osteogenic induction, in vitro mineralization was monitored using Alizarin red staining. (a) Demonstrative photos of osteogenesis in ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro (upper panel) or pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut (lower panel). (b) Quantification of positively stained area by Alizarin red in ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, versus cells treated with 0 ng/ml TNF‐α. (c) Quantification of positively stained area by Alizarin red in ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, versus cells treated with 0 ng/ml TNF‐α.

TNF‐α inhibits proliferation/survival of mesenchymal stem cells with the blockade of NF‐κB signaling pathway

MTT assay did not reveal any statistically significant changes in the proliferation/survival of ST2 cells treated with TNF‐α at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 ng/ml (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, the blockade of NF‐κB signaling pathway via the overexpression of IκBα showed a dose‐dependent negative effect of TNF‐α on the proliferation/survival of ST2 cells (Fig. 5b). No significant difference was detected between ST2‐pBABE‐puro cells and ST2‐pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut cells which were treated without TNF‐α.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

TNF‐α inhibits proliferation/survival of MSCs with the bloackade of NF‐κB signaling pathway. ST2 cells stably infected with pBABE‐puro (a) or pBABE‐puro‐IκBα‐mut (b) were seeded on 96‐well plates at a cell density of 2 × 103 cells/well and treated with murine TNF‐α at concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 or 100 ng/ml. At 24, 48, and 72 h after the TNF‐α treatment, the proliferation/survival of the cells was evaluated using the methylthiazolyldiphenyl‐tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. Data were represented as mean ± SEM.

Discussion

TNF‐α is a 17‐kDa cytokine produced by macrophages and other immune cells (18). It is the founding member of the TNF superfamily and has two different receptors: TNF receptor‐1 (TNFR1) and TNF receptor‐2 (TNFR2) (19). TNFR1 is expressed in almost all cells and is the functional form of the receptor in both osteoblasts and osteoclasts (20), whereas TNFR2 is primarily expressed in immune cells to regulate inflammation (18). In most cells, the binding of TNF‐α to TNFR1 causes the formation of a complex by TNF receptor‐associated protein with death domain (TRADD), receptor‐interacting kinase (RIP), and TNF‐receptor‐associated factor 2 (TRAF2), which eventually activates NF‐κB signaling pathway and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) such as p38, ERK and JNK (21). The activation of multiple signaling pathways after TNF‐α treatment and the interaction between these signaling pathways contribute to the complexity of TNF‐α‐induced effect on osteoblast differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis.

In this study, we found that TNF‐α treatment at lower concentrations moderately enhanced expression levels of osteogenic transcription factors and bone marker genes. In contrast, TNF‐α treatment at higher concentrations displayed inhibitory effect on osteogenic differentiation. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of TNF‐α observed in cell cultures treated with higher concentrations could be reversed by the blockade of NF‐κB signaling pathway, while the overexpression of IκBα had no effect on the positive effect of TNF‐α treatment at lower concentrations. These results clearly indicated that different signaling pathways dominate in cell cultures treated with TNF‐α at different concentrations. It has been reported that after TNF treatment, JNK activation was transient because the activation of JNK can be shut down by NF‐κB activation (22, 23). In addition, the activation level of NF‐κB is dramatically enhanced with the increase in TNF‐α concentration, while the activation level of members of the MAPK family including JNK, ERK and p38 only demonstrates a moderate increase or even moderate decrease with the increase in TNF‐α concentration (24, 25). While most studies have reported the inhibitory role of activated NF‐κB signaling pathway in osteogenic differentiation and bone formation (26, 27), it was reported that JNK, ERK and p38 are capable of stimulating differentiation of osteoblasts (28, 29, 30). Together with these previous findings, our results suggest that the treatment with TNF‐α at lower concentrations mainly activates the MAPK family members, which in turn displays positive effects on osteogenic differentiation. In contrast, higher concentrations of TNF‐α result in the activation of NF‐κB signaling pathway, and as a result, the osteogenic differentiation is inhibited directly by the activated NF‐κB.

Our results also demonstrated that long‐term treatment with TNF‐α displays dose‐dependent inhibition in osteogenic differentiation, which can be reversed by the suppression of NF‐κB signaling pathway. These data is consistent with previous findings indicating that prolonged TNF‐α treatment usually results in prominent activation of NF‐κB, while the usually transiently activated MAPK members such as JNK is rapidly inactivated by NF‐κB signaling (22, 23). The enhancement of mineral nodule formation derived from the inactivation of NF‐κB signaling pathway is also consistent with previous findings showing that a reduction in NFκB activity in osteoblasts results in an increase in bone formation via an increase in JNK activity (31).

The different signaling pathways activated by TNF‐α stimulation also demonstrated divergent effects on cell proliferation, survival and apoptosis. For example, TNF‐α induces the activation of the MAP kinase cascade including apoptosis signal‐regulating kinase 1 (ASK‐1), mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase 4/7 (MKK4/7) and JNK, which are all believed to mediate cell apoptotic and necrotic cell death (22, 32, 33). Conversely, TNF‐α treatment simultaneously activate a survival pathway mediated by the activation of NF‐κB (18, 33). The final cell response (proliferation versus apoptosis) to TNF‐α treatment is thus determined by the balance between the apoptotic signaling pathway and the NF‐kappaB survival pathway (19). Consistent with previous findings (10, 34), we found intact cell proliferation/survival in mesenchymal stem cells after TNF‐α treatment at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 ng/ml. In addition, the inactivation of the cell survival pathway via the overexpression of the NF‐κB inhibitor resulted in a significant decrease in cell proliferation/survival.

In conclusion, the binding of TNF‐α to its receptor results in the activation of multiple signaling pathways, which actively interact with each other to regulate the differentiation, proliferation, survival and apoptosis of mesenchymal stem cells. This makes it extremely challenging to find out the final role of TNF‐α in osteogenic differentiation, bone formation and tissue regeneration, especially in the situation of periodontal diseases which are characterized by enhanced inflammatory response and fluctuating TNF‐α level. Indeed, the effects of TNF‐α and cell‐signaling molecules on normal and pathological cellular processes still need further investigation to prevent excessive tissue destruction resulted from excessive production, dysregulation or inadequate inhibition of pro‐inflammatory cytokines.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30772425) to PY.

References

  • 1. Bartold PM, Cantley MD, Haynes DR (2010) Mechanisms and control of pathologic bone loss in periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 53, 55–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Page RC (1998) The pathobiology of periodontal diseases may affect systemic diseases: inversion of a paradigm. Ann Periodontol 3, 108–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Deo V, Bhongade ML (2010). Pathogenesis of periodontitis: role of cytokines in host response. Dent Today 29, 60–62, 64–66; quiz 68–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gould TR, Melcher AH, Brunette DM (1980) Migration and division of progenitor cell populations in periodontal ligament after wounding. J. Periodontal Res. 15, 20–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Li S, Tu Q, Zhang J, Stein G, Lian J, Yang PS et al. (2008) Systemically transplanted bone marrow stromal cells contributing to bone tissue regeneration. J. Cell. Physiol. 215, 204–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Page RC (1991) The role of inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J. Periodontal Res. 26, 230–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brunetti G, Colucci S, Pignataro P, Coricciati M, Mori G, Cirulli N et al. (2005) T cells support osteoclastogenesis in an in vitro model derived from human periodontitis patients. J. Periodontol. 76, 1675–1680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li W, Yu B, Li M, Sun D, Hu Y, Zhao M et al. (2010) NEMO‐binding domain peptide promotes osteoblast differentiation impaired by tumor necrosis factor alpha. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 391, 1228–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Matsumoto Y, Otsuka F, Takano M, Mukai T, Yamanaka R, Takeda M et al. (2010) Estrogen and glucocorticoid regulate osteoblast differentiation through the interaction of bone morphogenetic protein‐2 and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha in C2C12 cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 325, 118–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lacey DC, Simmons PJ, Graves SE, Hamilton JA (2009) Proinflammatory cytokines inhibit osteogenic differentiation from stem cells: implications for bone repair during inflammation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17, 735–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li B, Shi M, Li J, Zhang H, Chen B, Chen L et al. (2007) Elevated tumor necrosis factor‐alpha suppresses TAZ expression and impairs osteogenic potential of Flk‐1+ mesenchymal stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Stem Cells Dev. 16, 921–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lencel P, Hardouin P, Magne D (2010) Do cytokines induce vascular calcification by the mere stimulation of TNAP activity? Med. Hypotheses 75, 517–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mountziaris PM, Tzouanas SN, Mikos AG (2010) Dose effect of tumor necrosis factor‐alpha on in vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on biodegradable polymeric microfiber scaffolds. Biomaterials 31, 1666–1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tu Q, Valverde P, Chen J (2006) Osterix enhances proliferation and osteogenic potential of bone marrow stromal cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 341, 1257–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pan K, Sun Q, Zhang J, Ge S, Li S, Zhao Y et al. (2010) Multilineage differentiation of dental follicle cells and the roles of Runx2 over‐expression in enhancing osteoblast/cementoblast‐related gene expression in dental follicle cells. Cell Prolif. 43, 219–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Tu Q, Zhang J, Dong LQ, Saunders E, Luo E, Tang J et al. (2011) Adiponectin inhibits osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption via APPL1‐mediated suppression of AKT1. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 12542–12553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Datta N, Holtorf HL, Sikavitsas VI, Jansen JA, Mikos AG (2005) Effect of bone extracellular matrix synthesized in vitro on the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 26, 971–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wajant H, Pfizenmaier K, Scheurich P (2003) Tumor necrosis factor signaling. Cell Death Differ. 10, 45–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Han D, Ybanez MD, Ahmadi S, Yeh K, Kaplowitz N (2009) Redox regulation of tumor necrosis factor signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 2245–2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nanes MS (2003) Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha: molecular and cellular mechanisms in skeletal pathology. Gene 321, 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Micheau O, Tschopp J (2003) Induction of TNF receptor I‐mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes. Cell 114, 181–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Papa S, Bubici C, Zazzeroni F, Pham CG, Kuntzen C, Knabb JR et al. (2006) The NF‐kappaB‐mediated control of the JNK cascade in the antagonism of programmed cell death in health and disease. Cell Death Differ. 13, 712–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shen HM, Pervaiz S (2006b) TNF receptor superfamily‐induced cell death: redox‐dependent execution. FASEB J. 20, 1589–1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Eda H, Shimada H, Beidler DR, Monahan JB (2010) Proinflammatory cytokines, IL‐1beta and TNF‐alpha, induce expression of interleukin‐34 mRNA via JNK‐ and p44/42 MAPK‐NF‐kappaB pathway but not p38 pathway in osteoblasts. Rheumatol. Int. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Vincent C, Findlay DM, Welldon KJ, Wijenayaka AR, Zheng TS, Haynes DR et al. (2009) Pro‐inflammatory cytokines TNF‐related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) and TNFalpha induce the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK)‐dependent expression of sclerostin in human osteoblasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24, 1434–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Chang J, Wang Z, Tang E, Fan Z, McCauley L, Franceschi R et al. (2009) Inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation by nuclear factor‐kappaB. Nat. Med. 15, 682–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ruocco MG, Maeda S, Park JM, Lawrence T, Hsu LC, Cao Y et al. (2005) I{kappa}B kinase (IKK){beta}, but not IKK{alpha}, is a critical mediator of osteoclast survival and is required for inflammation‐induced bone loss. J. Exp. Med. 201, 1677–1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, Mrksich M (2010) Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4872–4877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lee K, Kim H, Kim JM, Kim JR, Kim KJ, Kim YJ et al. (2010) Systemic transplantation of human adipose‐derived stem cells stimulates bone repair by promoting osteoblast and osteoclast function. J. Cell Mol. Med. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Liu H, Liu Y, Viggeswarapu M, Zheng Z, Titus L, Boden SD (2010) Activation of c‐Jun NH(2)‐terminal kinase 1 increases cellular responsiveness to BMP‐2 and decreases binding of inhibitory Smad6 to the type I BMP receptor. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 1122–1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Krum SA, Chang J, Miranda‐Carboni G, Wang CY (2010) Novel functions for NFkappaB: inhibition of bone formation. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 607–611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shen HM, Liu ZG (2006a) JNK signaling pathway is a key modulator in cell death mediated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 40, 928–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wullaert A, Heyninck K, Beyaert R (2006) Mechanisms of crosstalk between TNF‐induced NF‐kappaB and JNK activation in hepatocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 72, 1090–1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Gilbert L, He X, Farmer P, Boden S, Kozlowski M, Rubin J et al. (2000) Inhibition of osteoblast differentiation by tumor necrosis factor‐alpha. Endocrinology 141, 3956–3964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Proliferation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES