LETTER
Posaconazole (POS) delayed-release tablets (DRT) are favored over the suspension formulation due to once-daily dosing and improved absorption (1–4). However, patients with feeding tubes who are unable to swallow whole tablets are occasionally encountered in clinical practice. Generally, extended/delayed-release products should not be crushed, as crushing these medications impacts the release mechanism, resulting in loss of gradual/targeted gastrointestinal absorption (5). The lack of predictable and gradual absorption may put patients at risk of toxicity from rapid absorption or reduced total bioavailability (5).
Posaconazole DRT are unique compared to many delayed-release products. These tablets contain 100 mg of POS in a pH-sensitive solid dispersion polymer matrix milled powder (6, 7). The polymer matrix powder dissolves at small intestinal pH, thereby releasing POS for absorption, and is the same material originally studied as capsules (6, 7). POS DRT are made from this resulting powder, small amounts of excipients to facilitate tablet formation, and a cosmetic coating material (S. Dutta, Merck & Co., Inc., personal communication). Thus, crushing POS DRT theoretically should not significantly alter absorption pharmacokinetics, although there are no previously published reports of clinical experience with crushed POS DRT.
We identified 4 patients who received crushed POS DRT at a dose of 300 mg/day. This case series was approved as required by institutional review board (IRB) standards at each institution, and medical records were manually reviewed. No patient had significant POS drug-drug interactions, and crushed tablets were well tolerated. All patients had detectable serum POS levels (Table 1). Two of four patients had subtherapeutic serum levels (<0.7 μg/ml). Although less frequent, subtherapeutic serum POS concentrations are encountered in patients with normally functioning gastrointestinal (GI) tracts. Yi et al. studied POS therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in 100 patients administered various POS formulations. Of the 100 patients, 29 and 33 received intravenous (i.v.) and DRT, respectively. Subtherapeutic levels (≤0.7 μg/ml) were seen in 3.4% and 18.2% receiving i.v. and DRT, respectively, compared with 63% receiving suspension (8). Tverdek et al. also reported subtherapeutic levels (<0.7 μg/ml) in 18% (14/76) of patients receiving POS DRT for invasive fungal infection (IFI) prophylaxis (9). Posaconazole suspension via nasogastric (NG) tube is associated with reduced absorption, and it is unknown if crushed POS DRT are similarly affected (1). Importantly, trough levels of >0.7 μg/ml may also be required for IFI treatment (10).
TABLE 1.
Patient | Underlying disease state(s) | Indication for POS | Crushed POS DRT route | Trough level (μg/ml) | Day of POS therapy level drawnb | Prior POS exposure and serum level | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MDS post stem cell transplant | Suspected breakthrough fungal pneumonia on VOR | Oral | 3.6 | 10 | None | Tablets chewed and swallowed orally as patient refused to swallow whole tablets and no alternative enteral access. POS i.v. unavailable for outpatient therapy. |
2 | Double lung transplant | Invasive mucormycosis | PEJ tube | 0.5 | 8 | None | Patient previously receiving i.v. isavuconazole. Crushed POS DRT used to minimize i.v. medications at transition to rehab facility. Due to subtherapeutic level on crushed POS DRT and multifactorial QTc elevation preventing dose increase (did not recur with rechallenge at a later date; no level collected with rechallenge), patient restarted on i.v. isavuconazole. |
3 | MM, ALL | Suspected fungal sinusitis | PEG tube | 1.5 | 12 | 300 mg POS DRT daily; no level obtained | Patient with significant dysphagia following stroke requiring PEG tube medication administration. POS i.v. unavailable for outpatient therapy. |
4 | Liver transplant | Breakthrough invasive fusariosis on VOR | NG tube | 0.3 | 7 | 0.3 μg/ml on day 7 of i.v. POS | i.v. POS changed to crushed POS DRT to minimize i.v. medications at transition to rehab facility. Crushed POS DRT dose increased to 400 mg daily based on subtherapeutic level, but no repeat trough obtained. |
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; DRT, delayed-release tablet; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MM, multiple myeloma; NG, nasogastric; PEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; POS, posaconazole; PEJ, percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy; QTc, corrected Q-T interval; SOT, solid organ transplant; VOR, voriconazole.
Day of crushed DRT therapy that posaconazole trough concentration obtained.
Crushed POS DRT appear to be a viable administration route in select patients when neither i.v. nor whole-tablet administration is feasible. As half of the patients in this small series had low POS serum levels, TDM is advisable to ensure POS absorption. Dosage individualization may be useful, and adjustments should be made based on TDM with repeat serum levels. Additionally, drug-drug interactions should be reviewed to rule out non-absorption-related causes. Limitations of this study include the small sample size, retrospective nature, nonstandardized crushed POS DRT administration technique, limited patient follow-up, and inability to extrapolate findings to other populations (e.g., pediatrics, severe mucositis). Further studies are warranted to more adequately assess the absorption of crushed POS DRT, the impact of dose changes, the effect of subclinical gastroparesis, and feeding tube type/location significance before routine adoption of this approach.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
D.P.K. acknowledges the Texas 4000 Distinguished Professorship for Cancer Research and the NIH-NCI Cancer Center CORE Support grant no. 16672. D.P.K. reports research support from Astellas Pharma and honoraria for lectures from Merck & Co., Gilead, and United Medical. D.P.K. has served as a consultant for Astellas Pharma, Cidara, Amplyx, and Mayne and on the advisory board of Merck & Co.
M.J.M., P.M.M., and W.L.M. declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Merck Sharp & Dohme. 2017. Noxafil (posaconazole) package insert. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Whitehouse Station, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Merck Canada Inc. 2017. Posanol (posaconazole) package insert. Merck Canada Inc, Kirkland, Quebec. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moore JN, Healy JR, Kraft WK. 2015. Pharmacologic and clinical evaluation of posaconazole. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 8:321–334. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.1034689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wiederhold NP. 2016. Pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole delayed-release tablets for invasive fungal infections. Clin Pharmacol 8:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cornish P. 2005. “Avoid the crush”: hazards of medication administration in patients with dysphagia or a feeding tube. CMAJ 172:871–872. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Krishna G, Ma L, Martinho M, O'Mara E. 2012. Single-dose phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in new tablet and capsule formulations relative to oral suspension. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4196–4201. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00222-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krishna G, Ma L, Martinho M, Preston RA, O'Mara E. 2012. A new solid oral tablet formulation of posaconazole: a randomized clinical trial to investigate rising single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2725–2730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yi WM, Schoeppler KE, Jaeger J, Mueller SW, MacLaren R, Fish DN, Kiser TH. 2017. Voriconazole and posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: a retrospective study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 16:60. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0235-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tverdek FP, Heo ST, Aitken SL, Granwehr B, Kontoyiannis DP. 2017. Real-life assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the new tablet and intravenous formulations of posaconazole in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections via analysis of 343 courses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00188-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00188-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dekkers BGJ, Bakker M, van der Elst KCM, Sturkenboom MGG, Veringa A, Span LFR, Alffenaar JC. 2016. Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole: an update. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 10:51–61. doi: 10.1007/s12281-016-0255-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]