Skip to main content
Cell Proliferation logoLink to Cell Proliferation
. 2012 May 10;45(4):287–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2012.00821.x

GSK3 inhibitor‐BIO regulates proliferation of female germline stem cells from the postnatal mouse ovary

Y Hu 1,2,3, Y Bai 1,2,3, Z Chu 1,2,3, J Wang 1,2,3, L Wang 1,2,3, M Yu 1,2,3, Z Lian 1,2,3, J Hua 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC6496214  PMID: 22571232

Abstract

Objective

It is widely believed that in most female mammalian neonates, all germ cells enter meiosis to form the primary oocyte at the end of foetal development, and as a result, the postnatal mammalian ovary harbours only a limited supply of oocytes that cannot be regenerated. However, this idea has been challenged by the discovery of the existence of female germline stem cells (FGSCs) in postnatal mammalian ovaries.

Materials and Methods

We have isolated ovarian GSCs from neonatal and adult mouse ovaries and expanded them in the same culture conditions as embryonic stem cells (ESCs).

Results

LIF and BIO were beneficial for formation of FGSC colonies. BIO promoted proliferation of FGSCs through activation of β‐catenin and up‐regulation of E‐cadherin. The FGSCs formed compact round colonies with unclear borders, maintained ESC characteristics and alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity, expressing germ‐cell markers‐Vasa, and stem‐cell markers: Oct4, Klf4, C‐myc, Nanog, CD49f, Sox2, CD133, SSEA1 and SSEA4. These cells had the ability to form embryoid bodies (EBs), which expressed specific markers for all three germ layers. Then we induced EBs to differentiate into neurons, cardiomyocytes, pancreatic cells and germ cells, which showed the expression of specific markers, β‐III‐tubulin, cardiac a‐actin, Pdx1 and Zps respectively.

Discussion and Conclusion

This study reveals the existence of FGSCs in postnatal mouse ovary with multipotent characteristics. BIO played an important role in regulation of proliferation and maintenance of the FGSCs. This could help provide a better understanding of causes of ovarian infertility, prevention and potential treatment of infertility.

Introduction

Germ cells are a unique cell population in that they alone transmit genetic material to offspring. Although germ cells are highly specialized populations for generation of gametes, several lines of evidence suggest their multipotentiality 1, 2. Scientists have already discovered that male germline stem cells (mGSCs), also called spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), exist in adult testis for spermatogenesis throughout life and can be transfected to produce transgenic offspring via SSC transplantation 3, 4.

In contrast, few studies have shown that female germline stem cells (FGSCs) exist in the ovary, or indeed stop dividing, after birth in most mammalian species 5. Recently, some studies have shown that the female gonad‐ovary has unexpected regenerative activity in adulthood 6, 7. Additionally, FGSC lines from neonatal or adult mice, with the characteristics of germ cells and embryonic stem cells (ESCs), have been established and cultured for a period in vitro 8, 9. These FGSCs of long‐term culture maintained their capacity to produce normal oocytes and fertile offspring after transplantation into ovaries 9. Pacchiarotti et al. also showed the existence of a population of germline stem cells in postnatal mouse ovaries 10. Recently, Parte et al. have reported that there are pluripotent, very small, embryonic‐like stem cells in adult rabbit, sheep, monkey and menopausal human ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), which may undergo asymmetric cell division to maintain homeostasis and have the ability to differentiate into oocyte‐like structures, in vitro 11.

However, the idea that adult ovaries possess any type of stem cell remains highly controversial. Additionally, the efficiency of isolation of FGSCs has still been low, and the mechanism of FGSCs activity has still been unclear 12. Previous studies have shown that the GSK3 inhibitor‐BIO activates Wnt signalling and is known to sustain pluripotency of both human and mouse ESCs, by inhibiting GSK3β 13, 14. Whether BIO could regulate proliferation and differentiation of FGSCs has still been an issue.

In this study, we have investigated the existence of FGSCs in postnatal mouse ovary, optimized the culture system for FGSCs, and demonstrated that these cells share plurtipotent ESC characteristics; thus, we propose that germline stem cells may provide a resource for study of development of oocytes, causes of ovarian infertility and prevention and potential treatment of infertility.

Materials and methods

Isolation and culture of female germline stem cells

To prepare the ovarian cells, ovaries of 1‐ and 8‐week‐old female mice were collected and minced after removal of adherent tissue. Specimens were digested in 1 mg/ml collagenase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C for 15 min with shaking at intervals. After being centrifuged at 300 g/min for 5 min, they were incubated in dissociation solution that consisted of a mixture of 0.2% (v/w) trypsin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1.4 mg/ml DNase (Invitrogen), for 10 min at 37 °C. Dissociated cells were cultured on mitomycin C (Sigma)‐treated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in 0.1% gelatin‐coated tissue culture plates in H‐DMEM (Invitrogen), supplemented with 15% foetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 2 mm l‐glutamine (Invitrogen), 1% non‐essential amino acids (Invitrogen), 0.1 mm β‐mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 100 mg/ml penicillin/streptomycin and 1000 U/ml leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF; Millipore, Billenca, MA, CA, USA). Cells were cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in air. Cultured cells were further dissociated in 0.05% (w/v) trypsin in combination with mechanical pipetting when reaching 70–80% confluence. Culture medium was refreshed every 2–3 days.

For the factorial design experiment, freshly isolated cells were plated on gelatin‐coated plates or MEF feeders in standard GSCs medium without growth factors or with combination of LIF (1000 U/ml; Millipore), EGF (epidermal growth factor, 10 ng/ml; Millipore), bFGF (basic fibroblast growth factor, 10 ng/ml; Millipore), GDNF (Glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor, 10 ng/ml; Peprotech, US) or PDGF (platelet‐derived growth factor, 50 ng/ml; Sigma), GSK3 inhibitor (BIO, 1–5 μm; Sigma), ERK inhibitor (PD 98059, 10 μm; Beyotime, Haimen, Jiangsu, China). On alternate days, half the medium was replaced by fresh medium supplemented with the same combination of growth factors. After 7 days, cultures were terminated and digital images were taken. The entire factorial design experiment was repeated at least twice.

Characterization of female germline stem cells

RT‐PCR

Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Tiangen, Beijing, China) from ESCs or treated EBs. Single‐strand cDNAs were prepared from 2 μg RNA using a reverse transcription kit (Fermentas, Europe) and specific gene expressions were analysed. RT‐PCR primers used for amplifying markers of stem cells, three germ layers or germ cells 16, 17, are listed in Table 1. PCR conditions were: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s; annealing temperature used was in accordance with the primer sequence for 30 s and 72 °C for 35 s, with final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA markers were used to confirm size of the resultant fragments.

Table 1.

Primer sequences and PCR reaction conditions

Gene Primer (5′→3′) Tm (°C) Size (bp)
β‐actin Forward: GCGGCATCCACGAAACTAC 58 138
Reverse: TGATCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGTC
Oct4 Forward: CGCCCGCATACGAGTTCT 58 487
Reverse: GCACCAGGGTCTCCGATTT
Nanog Forward: GATTCTTCTACCAGTCCCAAAC 54 376
Reverse: ATGCGTTCACCAGATAGCC
C‐myc Forward: CTGGTGGGCGAGATCATCA 54 304
Reverse: CACTGCCATGAATGATGTTCC
Klf4 Forward: CCAGGAGAACCCCAAGATGC 58 518
Reverse: GGGTGCCCTGCTGCGAGTA
β‐III‐tubulin Forward: CTTTTGGCCAGATCTTTAGACC 58 377
Reverse: CTCGTTGTCAATGCAATAGGTC
Nestin Forward: GCCACAGTGCCCAGTTCTA 58 567
Reverse: ATCCTCCATTCTTGGTTCTTC
Gata4 Forward: TCCCTCTTCCCTCCTCAAATTC 54 193
Reverse: TCAGCGTGTAAAGGCATCTG
Brachury Forward: AAGGTGGCTGTTGGGTAGGGAGT 58 451
Reverse: ATTGGGCGAGTCTGGGTGGATGT
Pdx1 Forward: AACGCAGGAACCACGATGAGAGG 67 483
Reverse: AAGGGGTCGCCCGAGTAAGAATG
PCNA Forward: AGTGGAGAACTTGGAAATGGAA 58 154
Reverse: GAGACAGTGGAGTGGCTTTTGT
CyclinA Forward: TGGCTGTGAACTACATTGA 50 136
Reverse: ACAAACTCTGCTACTTCTGG
CyclinD1 Forward: TGAACTACCTGGACCGCT 50 212
Reverse: CAGGTTCCACTTGAGYTTGT
Dazl Forward: ATGAAAGATAAAACCACCAACC 58 391
Reverse: TGTTGACAGCCTGGTCCACTGA
Cyp26b1 Forward: CGGGAGAAGTATGGCAACG 58 104
Reverse: TGGTGTTCGCCCAGTAGGA
Stra8 Forward: AGCAGCTTAGAGGAGGTCAAGA 58 111
Reverse: TACTCGGAACCTCACTTTTGTC
Zp1 Forward: TGGGACCAGAAGGGAAGC 58 281
Reverse: CTGAGGATTGCCACGGATAA
Zp2 Forward: CTGTCATCCTGAACTCGCTGT 60 229
Reverse: ACAAAACCCGCACTGAACC
Zp3 Forward: GAGCTTTTCGGCATTTCAAG 58 150
Reverse: AGCTTATCGGGGATCTGGTT
Gdf9 Forward: TAGTCCACCCACACACCTGA 62 197
Reverse: CCAGAAGCCTGAGAACCAAG
Figla Forward: CTCTGCTGCCCGTGGTCTT 58 304
Reverse: CTGCTCTGTGGTAGAAACGGC
Vasa Forward: AAAGTGCCCAGTTCTTGTTGCTAC 58 392
Reverse: ACTGGATTGGGAGCTTGTGAAG

Immunofluorescence analysis

Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and treated with 0.1% Triton X‐100 for 10 min at room temperature. After being blocked with 10% FBS for 30 min, cells were incubated in primary antibodies against Oct4 (1:500; Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA), Klf4 (1:200; Chemicon), C‐myc(1:200, Chemicon), Nanog (1:200; Chemicon), CD49f (1:500; Chemicon), Sox2 (1:200; Chemicon), CD133 (1:500; Chemicon), SSEA1 (1:200; Chemicon), SSEA4 (1:200; Chemicon), Lin28 (1:400; Chemicon), Tert (1:200; Chemicon), PCNA (1:200; Millipore), β‐catenin (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Active‐β‐catenin (1:200; Millipore), E‐cadherin (1:100; Millipore), β‐III‐tubulin (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), Pdx1 (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), CT3 (1:1,000; DSHB, US), cardiac a‐actin (1:500; Sigma), Vasa (1:200; Abcam), Stra8 (1:500; Abcam), Zp3 (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) and Figla (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), respectively, overnight at 4 °C. After being washed three times in PBS, specimens were incubated in appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Untreated ESCs and ovarian cells were used as negative control and positive control respectively. Images were captured using a Leica fluorescence microscope.

BrdU incorporation assay

Proliferation of FGSCs was assayed by BrdU incorporation, performed similarly as in previous reports 15. First, FGSCs in absence or presence of BIO (2.5 μm, 3 days) were treated with 30 μg/ml BrdU (Sigma) for 5 h, then subjected to BrdU immunostaining. More specifically, cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min at room temperature and washed three times, for 10 min each in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% Triton X‐100. Cells were then washed three times in PBS (pH 7.4) alone. Anti‐BrdU (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) diluted in 0.1 m PBS (pH 7.4) containing 5% normal goat serum was added and cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Cells were washed in PBS (pH 7.4) three times, and then incubated in secondary antibody (FITC‐labelled, 1:500; Millipore) for 1 h at room temperature. Three more washes were carried out and cells were visualized using a Leica fluorescence microscope and were analysed for BrdU uptake. Levels of BrdU positive cells in absence or presence of BIO were determined by manual counting using the fluorescence microscope 16.

Growth curves

Cells were seeded in 48‐well plates at 3 × 104 cells⁄well and their proliferative ability was assessed by construction of growth curves at intervals of 24 h. Cells were trypsinized and cell number was determined for 8 consecutive days (n = 3).

Differentiation potential of female germline stem cells

For EB formation, colonies in 1–3 passage FGSCs cultures were picked and dissociated with 0.05% trypsin solution (Invitrogen). Resuspended cells were plated on Petri dishes at 3 × 105 cells per 3.5 cm dish. After 3 days culture, cells were seen to have aggregated and formed embryoid bodies (EBs). Resulting EBs were transferred into culture 48‐well plates (10–15 EBs per well) and supplemented with differentiation medium, which was changed every 2 days to avoid its degradation. Seven days later, EBs and suspension cells were harvested and analysed.

Media

Media were as follows:

Spontaneous differentiation medium: H‐DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 15% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone), 2 mm l‐glutamine (Invitrogen), 1% non‐essential amino acids (Invitrogen), 0.1 mm β‐mercaptoethanol (Sigma) and 100 mg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma) 17.

Germ‐cell differentiation medium: spontaneous differentiation medium supplemented with 10% porcine follicular fluid (PFF) 18.

Cardiomyocyte differentiation medium: spontaneous differentiation medium supplemented with 0.75% DMSO and 0.1 μm RA in mESC control medium 19.

Pancreatic cell differentiation medium: FGSCs‐derived EBs were cultured in RPMI 1640⁄B27 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% BSA (Sigma), 100 mm nicotinamide (NIC; Sigma), 10 ng⁄ml exendin‐4 (Sigma), 1 mm sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), 2 mm glutamine (Invitrogen), 1 mm β‐mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 100 mg⁄ml penicillin⁄streptomycin, 20 ng⁄ml EGF (Millipore) and 20 ng⁄ml bFGF (Millipore) for 7 days 20.

Results

Enrichment and characterization of FGSCs

Cells from neonate and adult mouse ovaries cultured for 1–3 passages formed compact round colonies with unclear borders (Fig. 1a–f); they maintained embryonic stem‐cell characteristics – AP activity (Fig. 1g,h). Colony‐forming efficiency of FGSCs of neonate mice (1‐week old) per ovary was 0.20% compared to 0.08% in adult ovaries (8‐week old) (Fig. 1i); percentage of FGSC in 1‐week‐old mice was significantly higher than in 8‐week old mice. However, pluripotentiality of FGSC between 1‐week‐old and 8‐week‐old mice was similar here. RT‐PCR analysis showed that these cells were similar to mouse ESCs in expressing pluripotency markers Nanog, C‐myc, Oct4 and Klf4 (Fig. 1j). FGSC colonies were also shown to be positive for characteristic surface markers of pluripotent ES cells and mGSCs, including Klf4, C‐myc, Nanog, Oct4, Sox2, SSEA1, SSEA4, Lin28, Tert, CD133, CD49f, and germ‐cell marker Vasa, as analysed by immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The morphology and characterization of FGSCs. FGSC colonies from neonatal mouse ovaries cultured for 1 day (a), 2 days (b) and 3 days (c, d) formed compact, round colonies with unclear borders. FGSC colonies from adult mouse ovaries (e, f). FGSC colonies were positive for alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining (g, h). Colony‐forming efficiency of neonatal mouse ovarian FGSCs was 0.20% compared to 0.08% of adult ovarian GSCs (i). (j) Expression of pluripotent markers expressed in ES cells (ES), feeder‐FGSCs (GSC), feeder‐free‐GSCs (N‐GSC) and MEF. (a–c, f, h) Scale bar = 200 μm; (d) Scale bar = 800 μm; (e, g) Scale bar = 50 μm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of different factors on primary cell cultures were determined by numbers of FGSC colonies and numbers of AP‐positive FGSC colonies. (a) Mouse ES medium was the most efficient medium to obtain GSC colonies, and both human ES medium and medium supplemented with RE promoted proliferation of GSCs. (b) BIO significantly increased numbers of GSC colonies and number of AP‐positive GSC colonies with combination of LIF, while PD98059 had no detectable effects. (c) BIO promoted colony formation in the presence of LIF but not bFGF, and the effects of BIO are presented as a dose‐dependent model (d).

To further determine the effects of different commonly used growth factors in primary cultures of GSCs, a factorial design experiment was performed. For LIF, EGF, bFGF, GDNF and PDGF, effects were determined on number of FGSC colonies formed in culture. LIF had significant positive effects on number of colonies and the colonies were compact and round. On the other hand, cells grown in bFGF had almost no typical type of colony formation. Colonies were bigger when cultured on feeder layers than when cultured feeder‐free. No significant effects were detected for bFGF, GDNF and PDGF on number of colonies obtained (data not shown). We then observed conformation of GSC colonies when FGSCs were cultured in standard mouse ES medium, human ES medium and medium supplemented with retinol (RE; Sigma). We found that mouse ES was the most efficient medium to obtain FGSC colonies, although both human ES medium and medium supplemented with RE were able to promote proliferation of FGSCs (Fig. 3a). GSK3 inhibitor‐BIO significantly increased the number of GSC colonies and number of AP‐positive colonies with combination of LIF, while ERK inhibitor‐PD98059 had no detectable effects (Fig. 3b). BIO promoted colony formation in the presence of LIF, but not with bFGF, and effects of BIO are presented as a dose‐dependent model (Fig. 3c,d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The expression of pluripotent markers in FGSCs. Effects of different growth factors on primary cell cultures were determined by numbers of GSC colonies and numbers of AP‐positive GSC colonies. FGSC colonies expressed markers characteristic of pluripotent ES cells and mGSCs including Klf4, C‐myc, Nanog, Oct4, Sox2, SSEA1, SSEA4, Lin28, Tert, CD133, CD49f and germ‐cell marker Vasa, as analysed by immunofluorescene staining. Nuclear staining with Hoechst33342 (blue) is also shown. Scale bar = 200 μm.

GSK‐3 inhibitor BIO promoted colony formation of FGSCs

FGSCs presented as typical colonies with long spindle cell morphology of mesenchymal‐like cells, in the presence and absence of BIO, when cultured feeder‐free. There were more colonies and they were significantly more dense in BIO specimens, than without BIO (Fig. 4a). Number of colonies was significantly increased (in the region of 3‐fold, P < 0.01) in the presence of BIO (Fig. 3d).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GSK‐3 inhibitor BIO promoted colony formation and proliferation of FGSCs. (a) FGSCs presented as typical colonies and long spindle cell morphology of mesenchymal‐like cells, in the presence and absence of BIO when cultured feeder‐free. There were more cell colonies and colonies were significantly more dense in BIO than without BIO. When cells were treated with BrdU, control cells had a lower level of BrdU incorporation. Percentage of PCNA positive cells also had an up‐trend compared to that in the absence of BIO. (b) BrdU was more likely to incorporate into cells of compact round FGSC colonies with a clear border. (c) Percentage of BrdU‐positive cells treated with or without BIO from (a). (d) expression of cell cycle proteins cyclinA and cyclin D1, and proliferation markers C‐myc and PCNA were up‐regulated in BIO medium compared to in the absence of BIO, analysed by RT‐PCR. (e) Growth curves of FGSCs cultured in absence and presence of BIO (2.5 μm). Scale bar = 200 μm.

When cells were treated with BrdU, it was more likely to be found to incorporate in GSCs colonies, including round flat monolayer cell colonies, with or without a clear boundary, and in cells of compact round colonies with a clear border (Fig. 4b). In total, control cells had lower levels of BrdU incorporation. The BrdU incorporation assay demonstrated that mitotic index in the presence of BIO was higher than without BIO (Fig. 4c). Percentages of PCNA positive cells also had an up‐trend compared to that in the absence of BIO.

Expression of proliferation markers C‐myc and PCNA were up‐regulated in BIO medium compared to in the absence of BIO analysed by RT‐PCR, and expression of cell cycle proteins cyclinA and cyclinD1 were increased in BIO treated cells (Fig. 4d).

Growth curves of GSCs cultured in absence and presence of BIO (2.5 μm) are shown in Fig. 4e. Proliferation of total cells was not significantly different between presence of BIO and control specimens, but when treated with BIO, numbers of GSCs increased clearly.

FGSCs in the presence of BIO seemed to find it easier to form colonies and to express C‐myc, as shown by immunofluorescence staining. Meanwhile, β‐catenin was activated when FGSCs were cultured in the presence of BIO. In control cells, β‐catenin staining was weak and appeared to be located at cell membranes only. In contrast, BIO‐stimulated cells showed some nuclear staining, suggesting that there was increased level of β‐catenin. After treatment with BIO, FGSCs had more compact morphology and were aggregated, suggesting changes in cell adhesion 21. Therefore, we studied levels of E‐cadherin upon BIO stimulation. As visualized by immunofluorescence, E‐cadherin was expressed in BIO‐treated FGSCs, while it was not expressed in untreated cells (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

GSK‐3 inhibitor BIO activated Wnt signalling pathways in FGSCs. Immunofluorescene staining analysis indicated that expression of β‐catenin and C‐myc were up‐regulated in BIO medium compared to in the absence of BIO. Activated‐β‐catenin and E‐cadherin were expressed in BIO‐treated GSCs, which was not observed in control cells. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Differentiation potential of FGSCs in vitro

FGSCs had the ability to form EBs after 3 days in suspension culture (Fig. 6a) and expressed specific markers of all three germ layers after 7 days spontaneous differentiation. RT‐PCR analysis showed GSC‐EBs expressed β‐III‐tubulin, Nestin, Gata4, Brachury and Pdx1. Primary ovarian cells were employed as the negative control (Fig. 6c).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The differentiation potentiality of FGSCs. Ovarian GSCs formed EBs after 3 days of suspension culture (a, b). (c) RT‐PCR analysis showed GSC‐EBs expressed β‐III‐tubulin, Nestin, Gata4, Brachury and Pdx1; primary ovarian cells were employed as negative control. Induced GSC‐EBs showed expression of neuron‐specific marker β‐III‐tubulin (e), cardiomyocyte‐specific markers CT3 (g) and cardiac α‐actin (i), pancreatic cell‐specific marker Pdx1 (k) respectively. d, f, h, g were Hoechst 33342 stained nucleus of e, g, i and k respectively. (a) Scale bar = 100 μm; (b) Scale bar = 50 μm; (d–k) Scale bar = 200 μm.

To confirm potentiality for differentiation in vitro, 3‐day suspension EBs were induced by germ‐cell differentiation medium, neural cell differentiation medium, cardiomyocyte differentiation medium and pancreatic cell differentiation medium. EB‐like clusters derived from FGSCs were attached and cultured for 7 days. Induced GSC‐EBs showed expression of neuron‐specific marker β‐III‐tubulin (Fig. 6e). Neural‐like cells were observed when cultures were induced with neural cell differentiation medium. Additionally, cardiomyocyte specific markers CT3 (Fig. 6g), cardiac a‐actin (Fig. 6i) and pancreatic cell‐specific marker Pdx1 (Fig. 6k) positive cells were obtained after induction.

After treating EB‐like clusters with PFF, morphological changes were observed 4 days after induction, characterized by formation of round cells suspended in the media (Fig. 7a). Furthermore, 10 days after induction, round cells differentiated into oocyte‐like cells in expanding size, and some clusters gradually formed cystic structures only loosely attached to the plate (Fig. 7c). The putative oocyte‐like cells derived from GSCs, however, had no zona pellucida (Zp) and approximately ranged from 20 to 50 μm in diameter, never reaching normal oocyte size. Immunofluorescence analysis demonstrated that some cells treated with PFF were positive for germ‐cell specific markers Vasa, Stra8, Zp3 and Figla. At mRNA levels, germ‐cell markers Vasa, Dazl and oocyte markers Figla and Zps, were up‐regulated after PFF induction, while stem‐cell marker Oct4 was down‐regulated. Expressions of Stra8, Cyp26b1 and Gdf9 were not clearly different between induced cells and controls (Fig. 7t).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

FGSCs differentiated into germ‐like cells. After treating clusters with porcine follicular fluid (PFF), morphological changes were observed at 4 days of induction, characterized by formation of round cells suspended in the media (a). Furthermore, round cells and follicular‐like cells appeared at 10 days after induction (b, c). (d) Clusters differentiated 10 days without PFF were employed as negative control. Immunofluorescence analysis demonstrated that some cells were positive for germ cell‐specific markers Vasa (g), Stra8 (k, s), Zp3 (o) and Figla (p). e, i, m, r were light microscopy of g, k, o and s respectively. f, j, n were Hoechst 33342‐stained nuclei of g, k and o respectively. (t) RT‐PCR analysis showed that expressions of germ‐cell markers Vasa, Dazl and oocyte markers Figla and Zps were up‐regulated in PFF induction, while stem‐cell marker Oct4 was down‐regulated. (a, d) Scale bar = 100 μm; (b, c, r, s) Scale bar = 50 μm; (e–q) Scale bar = 200 μm.

Discussion

FGSCs can be cultured over long time periods, and retain the capacity to differentiate into multiple cell types in the presence of serum or feeder cells, in vitro 9, 10, 22. It has been reported that in vitro cultures of mammalian FGSCs in the presence of LIF, bFGF or GDNF, have developed the morphology of colonies similar to ES cells 10, 23 and additionally, these cells shared similar phenotypic characteristics to those of pluripotent ES cells 1, 10. Pluripotency‐related markers Oct‐4 24, SSEA1 25, CD133 26, α6‐integrin (CD49f), Sox2 and Tert have been identified in mice and human mGSCs and pluripotent ES cells 1, 27, 28. Our cultured FGSCs shared some similar characteristics to pluripotent ES cells, mGSCs, primordial germ cells (PGCs) and GSCs, as analysed by immunofluorescence staining 1, 10, 27. Additionally, we found that younger mice had higher percentages of FGSC in their ovaries.

Niches and microenvironments play an important role in the fate and behaviour of stem cells 29. In the present study, mouse FGSCs were cultured with up to four passages, over 3 weeks, still maintained partially homogenous characteristics to mouse ESCs, indicating that our culture system is able to simulate the stem cell niche of ovary and maintain proliferation and differentiation of FGSCs in vitro. Co‐culture of adult ovarian cells with somatic fibroblasts can produce colony‐forming cells having ESC‐like activity, which may provide an alternative for establishing autologous stem cells from adults that can be obtained without genetic manipulation 30. Previous studies have shown that there may exist very small embryonic‐like cells (VSELs) in many adult tissues such as the heart and brain, as well as in umbilical cord blood and peripheral blood in adult human bone marrow, lung and heart. These VSELs express several markers of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), such as Oct‐4, Nanog and SSEA‐1 31. Cultured FGSCs then de‐differentiated into pluripotent ES‐like cells in vitro in appropriate microenvironments 29, 30. Our results show that LIF and BIO promoted formation of FGSC colonies and AP‐positive FGSC colonies; this demonstrated that FGSCs could be reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells similar to male germline stem cells in vitro 1, 27. It is possible, however, that there are two different lineages in the adult ovary, one pluripotent and the other pre‐committed towards the germ‐cell line.

In this study, our results have demonstrated that FGSCs could successfully be cultured in BIO medium and that BIO up‐regulated expression of proliferation markers including C‐myc and PCNA, compared to controls. Moreover, several cell cycle regulators, known to regulate cell cycle progression during G1/S transition, were also detected. Both cyclin D1 and cyclin A were up‐regulated in BIO, which indicated that both were involved in regulating cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase, as induced by BIO. Myc is activated through various mitogenic signals such as Wnt, Shh and EGF (via the MAPK/ERK pathway). Myc activation results in many biological effects including driving cell proliferation (by up‐regulating cyclins), regulating cell population growth (by up‐regulating ribosomal RNA and proteins), apoptosis, differentiation and self‐renewal of stem cells. Myc is a strong proto‐oncogene and its overexpression stimulates gene amplification 32. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a distinct marker for cell proliferation 33, 34, which here was up‐regulated in BIO medium. These results demonstrate that BIO may regulate C‐myc, which results in up‐regulation of PCNA, cyclinA and cyclin D1 to maintain self‐renewal of FGSCs.

Wnt describes a large family of secreted glycoproteins, and there are extracellular Wnt‐ligands, which interact with receptors of the frizzled family, involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, organogenesis and cell migration 35, 36. Wnt‐dependent genes include those encoding regulators of proliferation (cyclin D1, c‐myc and e2f1), differentiation [mesendodermal markers T/Brachyury and Pitx2 (paired‐like homeodomain transcription factor 2)], EMT (epithelial–mesenchymal transition) (Slug, Snail and vimentin) and these operate during development and in adult tissues 35, 37, 38, 39. Upon Wnt signalling, β‐catenin is stabilized, accumulating in the cytoplasm and eventually translocating to the nucleus, where it interacts with DNA‐binding proteins of the T‐cell Factor/Lymphocyte Enhancer binding Factor (Tcf/Lef) family. In the presence of β‐catenin, Tcf/Lef behaves with transcriptional activity 40. However, BIO may inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) activity, and activate Wnt/β‐catenin signalling and Ca2+ signalling pathways 41, 42. In this study, β‐catenin was activated, and total β‐catenin and E‐cadherin were increased in BIO‐treated cells. Accumulation of β‐catenin is a clear hallmark of Wnt signalling 43. These results clearly demonstrate that BIO inhibited GSK3β activity, and activated Wnt/β‐catenin signalling, and Ca2+ signalling pathways in FGSCs 21. Key downstream transcriptional regulators of the Wnt pathway influence transcription of target gene C‐myc and cyclin D1, thus promoting proliferation of FGSCs.

The Wnt signalling pathway and its negative regulator kinase GSK3β are also considered to be involved in maintenance of pluripotency. The function of GSK3 inhibitor‐BIO in maintenance of pluripotent stem cells has been previously demonstrated 13. Our results show combined treatment of FGSCs with BIO and LIF resulted in a significantly higher level of colony formation over the of other groups. LIF and Wnt/β‐catenin pathway signalling have also been reported to have a synergistic effect and are successfully used in establishment of mouse ES cell lines 43, 44.

Furthermore, our research found that GSK3 inhibitor‐BIO helped to maintain the undifferentiated status of FGSCs by their undergoing mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET). During MET, fibroblasts deviate from their mesenchymal origin and organize into compact, laterally connected cells. At the transcriptional level, c‐Myc down‐regulates TGF‐β1 and TGF‐β receptor 2, suppressing EMT, and Klf4 induces typically epithelial genes, including that for E‐cadherin 45. Moreover, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are derived from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) by MET, at early stages of reprogramming 45, 46, 47. These results suggest the possibility that MET is associated with stem‐cell state. Our results demonstrate that combined treatment of LIF with BIO could significantly contribute to the establishment of FGSC colonies and maintain their undifferentiated status by a mechanism of β‐catenin activation and E‐cadherin up‐regulation 44.

The FGSCs differentiated into three germ layer types in a spontaneous differentiation conditions and induction system 10, 11, 30, although self‐renewal potentiality of these cells needs to be further investigated 11. Gong et al. 30 have demonstrated that ES‐like cell lines were established, which expressed markers specific for ESC and formed EBs and teratomas. To our knowledge, this is the first study to obtain Kunbai mouse FGSCs lines with ES‐like cell characteristics 1, 9, 10, 30 and the characteristics of our cells were similar to mouse ESCs and mouse FGSCs 10, 11, 30, suggesting conserved pathways in mammalian germ cell development. Several lines of evidence have suggested that extensive proliferative activity and pluripotency of neonatal and adult germline stem cells exist in mouse ovary and testis 10, 48, 49, 50. Most of the reports consider that the germline stem cell in ovaries exists in OSE 11. However, our results indicated that cells positive for both Vasa and c‐kit, Oct4 or SSEA4 were localized around the follicles, which were internally and exteriorly examined by immunofluorescence analysis (data not shown). In mammalian ovaries, FGSCs originate from undifferentiated PGCs 7.

In our study, some oocyte‐like cells were formed in PFF‐treated FGSCs; these cells were positive for germ‐cell markers including meiosis markers Dazl and Stra8, germ‐cell marker Vasa and oocyte markers Figla and Zps. This was consistent with previous reports and demonstrated that oocyte‐like cells may be derived from germline stem cells and further types of stem cell 6, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56. Lee et al. demonstrated that autologous embryonic stem cells can be established by preantral follicle culture and oocyte parthenogenesis 57. However, efficiency of derivation of oocyte‐like cells from stem cells was low and oocytes from stem cells were not truly functional 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56.

In conclusion, we have successfully established FGSCs from mouse neonatal and adult ovaries. These cells have characteristics similar to ESCs, and have the ability to differentiate into oocyte‐like cells in vitro following PFF treatment. This provides us with an unlimited resource and in vitro model to study development of the mammalian oocyte.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Program (30972097) from National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key Program of State Education Ministry (109148), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET‐09‐0654), The Scientific Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2011K02‐06), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (QN2011012), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (20080431253, 200801438).

References

  • 1. Conrad S, Renninger M, Hennenlotter J, Wiesner T, Just L, Bonin M et al (2008) Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult human testis. Nature 456, 344–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Guan K, Nayernia K, Maier LS, Jiang J, DeStefano D, Fernandez‐Bueno C et al (2006) Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis. Nature 440, 1199–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kanatsu‐Shinohara M, Miki H, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Toyokuni S, Ogura A et al (2005) Long term culture of mouse male germline stem cells under serum or feeder‐free conditions. Biol. Reprod. 72, 985–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kanatsu‐Shinohara M, Ikawa M, Takehashi M, Ogonuki N, Miki H, Inoue K et al (2006) Production of knockout mice by random and targeted mutagenesis in spermatogonial stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8018–8023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Anderson LD, Hirshfield AN (1992) An overview of follicular development in the ovary: from embryo to the fertilized ovum in vitro. Md. Med. J. 41, 614–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Johnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, Pru JK, Tilly JL (2004) Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 428, 145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Abban G, Johnson J (2009) Stem cell support of oogenesis in the human. Hum. Reprod. 24, 2974–2978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Virant‐Klun I, Zech N, Rozman P, Vogler A, Cvjeticanin B, Klemenc P et al (2008) Putative stem cells with an embryonic character isolated from the ovarian surface epithelium of women with no naturally present follicles and oocytes. Differentiation 76, 843–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zou K, Yuan Z, Yang ZJ, Luo H, Sun K, Zhou L et al (2009) Production of offspring from a germline stem cell line derived from neonatal ovaries. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 631–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pacchiarotti J, Maki C, Ramos T et al (2010) Differentiation potential of germ line stem cells derived from the postnatal mouse ovary. Differentiation 79, 159–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Parte S, Bhartiya D, Telang J et al (2011) Detection, characterization, and spontaneous differentiation in vitro of very small embryonic‐like putative stem cells in adult mammalian ovary. Stem Cells Dev. 20, 1451–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 12. Bukovsky A (2011) Ovarian stem cell niche and follicular renewal in mammals. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 294, 1284–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dravid G, Ye Z, Hammond H, Chen G, Pyle A, Donovan P et al (2005) Defining the role of Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling in the survival, proliferation, and self‐renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 23, 1489–1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Anton R, Kestler HA, Kühl M (2007) Beta‐catenin signaling contributes to stemness and regulates early differentiation in murine embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett. 581, 5247–5254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mussmann R, Geese M, Harder F, Kegel S, Andag U, Lomow A et al (2007) Inhibition of GSK3 promotes replication and survival of pancreatic beta cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12030–12037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cao H, Chu Y, Lv X, Qiu P, Liu C, Zhang H et al (2012) GSK3 inhibitor‐BIO regulates proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from fetal porcine pancreas (PMSCs).Plos one (PONE‐D‐11‐13451R2): 7, e31502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hu Y, Sun JW, Jing Wang, Wang L, Bai Y, Yu M et al (2012) Characterization of female germ cells derived from mouse embryonic stem cells through expression of GFP under the control of Figla promoter. J. Cell. Biochem. 113, 1111–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hu Y, Pan S, Wang J, Zhang S, Wang L, Hua J (2010) Derivation of oocyte‐like cells from mouse embryonic stem cells. Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 3rd International Conference 4, 1659–1663. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hua J, Xu X, Dou Z (2006) Rhythmic beating cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic germ (EG) cells in vitro. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 23, 1080–1085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cao H, Chu Y, Zhu H, Sun J, Pu Y, Gao Z et al (2011) Characterization of immortalized mesenchymal stem cells derived from fetal porcine pancreas. Cell Prolif. 44, 19–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sineva GS, Pospelov VA (2010) Inhibition of GSK3β enhances both adhesive and signaling activities of β‐catenin in mouse embryonic stem cells. Biol. Cell 102, 549–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhang Y, Yang Z, Yang Y, Wang S, Shi L, Xie W et al (2011) Production of transgenic mice by random recombination of targeted genes in female germline stem cells. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 132–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Virant‐Klun I, Rozman P, Cvjeticanin B, Vrtacnik‐Bokal E, Novakovic S, Rülicke T et al (2009) Parthenogenetic embryo‐like structures in the human ovarian surface epithelium cell culture in postmenopausal women with no naturally present follicles and oocytes. Stem Cells Dev. 18, 137–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pesce M, Scholer HR (2001) Oct‐4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells 19, 271–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ko K, Tapia N, Wu G, Kim JB, Bravo MJ, Sasse P et al (2009) Induction of pluripotency in adult unipotent germline stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5, 87–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Schrot RJ, Ma JH, Greco CM, Arias AD, Angelastro JM (2007) Organotypic distribution of stem cell markers in formalin‐fixed brain harboring glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 85, 149–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kanatsu‐Shinohara M, Lee J, Inoue K (2008) Pluripotency of a single spermatogonial stem cell in mice. Biol. Reprod. 78, 681–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hua J, Sidhu KS (2011) Coaxing hESC to form oocyte‐like structures by co‐culture with testicular extract and hormones. Open Stem Cell J. 3, 34–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Xie T, Li L (2007) Stem cells and their niche: an inseparable relationship. Development 134, 2001–2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gong SP, Lee ST, Lee EJ, Kim DY, Lee G, Chi SG et al (2010) Embryonic stem cell‐like cells established by culture of adult ovarian cells in mice. Fertil. Steril. 93, 2594–2601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wojakowski W, Kucia M, Zuba‐Surma E, Jadczyk T, Książek B, Ratajczak MZ et al (2010) Very small embryonic‐like stem cells in cardiovascular repair. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011 129, 21–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Denis N, Kitzis A, Kruh J, Dautry F, Corcos D (1991) Stimulation of methotrexate resistance and dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification by c‐myc. Oncogene 6, 1453–1457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Costoya JA, Hobbs RM, Barna M, Cattoretti G, Manova K, Sukhwani M et al (2004) Essential role of Plzf in maintenance of spermatogonial stem cells. Nat. Genet. 36, 653–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wrobel KH, Bickel D, Kujat R (1996) Immunohistochemical study of seminiferous epithelium in adult bovine testis using monoclonal antibodies against Ki‐67 protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Cell Tissue Res. 283, 191–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Willert K, Jones KA (2006) Wnt signaling: is the party in the nucleus? Genes Dev. 20, 1394–1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Dreesen O, Brivanlou AH (2007) Signaling pathways in cancer and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 3, 7–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Arnold SJ, Stappert J, Bauer A, Kispert A, Herrmann BG, Kemler R (2000) Brachyury is a target gene of the Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling pathway. Mech. Dev. 91, 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wang J, Wynshaw‐Boris A (2004) The canonical Wnt pathway in early mammalian embryogenesis and stem cell maintenance/differentiation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14(5), 533–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Abramova MV, Pospelova TV, Nikulenkov FP, Hollander CM, Fornace JAJ, Pospelov VA (2006) G1/S arrest induced by histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate in E1A+Ras‐transformed cells is mediated through down‐regulation of E2F activity and stabilization of beta‐catenin. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 21040–21051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rocques N, Abou Zeid N, Sii‐Felice K, Lecoin L, Felder‐Schmittbuhl MP, Eychène A et al (2007) GSK‐3‐mediated phosphorylation enhances Maf‐transforming activity. Mol. Cell 28, 584–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Gordon MD, Nusse R (2006) Wnt signaling: multiple pathways, multiple receptors, and multiple transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 22429–22433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Katoh M, Katoh M (2007) WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 4042–4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Maher MT, Mo R, Flozak AS, Peled ON, Gottardi CJ (2010) Beta‐catenin phosphorylated at serine 45 is spatially uncoupled from beta‐catenin phosphorylated in the GSK3 domain: implications for signaling. PLoS ONE 5, 10184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ogawa K, Nishinakamura R, Iwamatsu Y, Shimosato D, Niwa H (2006) Synergistic action of Wnt and LIF in maintaining pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 343, 159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Ten Berge D, Kurek D, Blauwkamp T, Koole W, Maas A, Eroglu E et al (2011) Embryonic stem cells require wnt proteins to prevent differentiation to epiblast stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1070–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Li R, Liang J, Ni S, Zhou T, Qing X, Li H et al (2010) A mesenchymal‐to‐epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 7, 51–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Polo JM, Hochedlinger K (2010) When fibroblasts MET iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 7, 5–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Samavarchi‐Tehrani P, Golipour A, David L, Sung HK, Beyer TA, Datti A et al (2010) Functional genomics reveals a BMP‐driven mesenchymal‐to‐epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 7, 64–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Golestaneh N, Kokkinaki M, Pant D, Jiang J, DeStefano D, Fernandez‐Bueno C et al (2009) Pluripotent stem cells derived from adult human testes. Stem Cells Dev. 18, 1115–1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zou K, Hou L, Sun K, Xie W, Wu J (2011) Improved efficiency of female germline stem cell purification using fragilis‐based magnetic bead sorting. Stem Cells Dev. 20, 2197–2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hübner K, Fuhrmann G, Christenson LK, Kehler J, Reinbold R, De La Fuente R et al (2003) Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 300, 1251–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Clark AT, Bodnar MS, Fox M et al (2004) Spontaneous differentiation of germ cells from human embryonic stem cells in‐vitro. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 721–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kee K, Angeles VT, Flores M et al (2009) Human DAZL, DAZ and BOULE genes modulate primordial germ‐cell and haploid gamete formation. Nature 462, 222–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Dyce PW, Wen L, Li J (2006) In vitro germline potential of stem cells derived from fetal porcine skin. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 384–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Dyce PW, Liu J, Tayade C et al (2011a) In vitro and in vivo germ line potential of stem cells derived from newborn mouse skin. PLoS ONE 6, e20339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Dyce PW, Shen W, Huynh E et al (2011b) Analysis of oocyte‐like cells differentiated from porcine fetal skin‐derived stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 20, 809–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Lee ST, Choi MH, Lee EJ, Gong SP, Jang M, Park SH et al (2008) Establishment of autologous embryonic stem cells derived from preantral follicle culture and oocyte parthenogenesis. Fertil. Steril. 90, 1910–1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Proliferation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES