Skip to main content
Cell Proliferation logoLink to Cell Proliferation
. 2010 Jun 29;43(4):378–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00687.x

Expression phenotype changes of EBV‐transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines during long‐term subculture and its clinical significance

J‐E Lee 1, H‐Y Nam 1, S‐M Shim 1, G‐R Bae 1, B‐G Han , J‐P Jeon
PMCID: PMC6496229  PMID: 20590663

Abstract

Objectives:  The EBV‐transformed lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) is a useful resource for population‐based human genetic and pharmacogenetic studies. The principal objective here was to assess expression phenotype changes during long‐term subculture of LCLs, and its clinical significance.

Materials and methods:  We searched for genes that were differentially expressed in 17 LCLs at late (p161) passage compared to early passage (p4) using microarray assay, then validated them by real‐time RT‐PCR analysis. In addition, we estimated correlations between expression phenotypes of 20 LCL strains at early passage and 23 quantitative clinical traits from blood donors of particular LCL strains.

Results:  Transcript sequences of 16 genes including nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) pathway‐related genes (such as PTPN13, HERC5 and miR‐146a) and carcinogenesis‐related genes (such as XAF1, TCL1A, PTPN13, CD38 and miR‐146a) were differentially expressed (>2‐fold change) in at least 15 of the 17 LCL strains. In particular, TC2N, FCRL5, CD180, CD38 and miR‐146a were downregulated in all 17 of the evaluated LCL strains. In addition, we identified clinical trait‐associated expression phenotypes in LCLs.

Conclusion:  Our results showed that LCLs acquired expression phenotype changes involving expression of NF‐κB pathway‐ and carcinogenesis‐related genes during long‐term subculture. These differentially expressed genes can be considered to be a gene signature of LCL immortalization or EBV‐induced carcinogenesis. Clinical trait‐associated expression phenotypes should prove useful in the discovery of new candidate genes for particular traits.

Introduction

Lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) have been utilized previously as biological resources for population‐based human genetic or proteomic studies. For example, gene expression profiling between LCLs from autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients and controls has been performed, using microarray techniques, to verify candidate genes for ASD diagnosis (1). LCLs from patients with mitochondrial diseases and control subjects have been assessed to identify mitochondrial disease‐associated proteins, by a 2‐DE procedure (2). Recently, utilization of LCLs has been extended to pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic research, including studies on differences in drug response according to individual genetic variation (3, 4). Cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents such as dexamethasone has been compared between LCLs from Down’s syndrome (DS) patients and non‐DS patients (4).

However, there is some concern about extensive use of LCLs due to possible genetic changes or relevant gene expression changes during LCL generation and maintenance. For example, when DNA methylation in LCLs from type 1 diabetes patients was compared with that in paired peripheral blood leucocytes, differences in DNA methylation were observed in 27 (8%) of 318 genes (5). Therefore, we have established a biological characterization of LCLs using a long‐term subculture collection of 20 LCL strains, in effort to increase utility of LCLs and to provide quality‐controlled LCLs for genetic and pharmacogenomic studies. In a previous study, we showed that large genomic alterations may not occur, at least in the early stages of LCL culture (6). In addition, we reported that sustained EBV activity, as well as telomerase activity, may be required for complete LCL immortalization (7).

When LCLs proliferate up to passage number of 160, the LCL is considered ‘terminally immortalized’. In this study, we have identified genes expressed differentially in 17 LCL strains at late (p161) passages compared to early passages (p4) using a microarray assay, followed by validation by real‐time RT‐PCR. Moreover, we assessed correlations between expression phenotypes of LCL strains at early passages (p4) and 23 quantitative clinical data of donors.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Twenty LCL strains (n = 20) were selected randomly for long‐term subculture from an LCL collection at the Korean HapMap project, as described in previous reports (7, 8, 9). These LCL strains were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified air. Culture medium was replaced with fresh complete medium at each passage. LCL strains were maintained in culture medium until passage number 160 to obtain terminally immortalized LCL strains. Seventeen strains among them were capable of proliferating for 160 or more passages, which is generally considered to be a critical passage number for terminal immortalization of LCLs. In contrast, three LCL strains stopped proliferating at passage numbers of 33, 44 and 48, as described in our previous study (7).

Microarray experimentation and analysis

Total RNA was isolated from LCLs using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), then converted into labelled cDNA and hybridized on an Affymetrix GeneChip® Human Gene 1.0ST Array containing 764 885 differential probes, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. After washing the hybridized chip, chip images were scanned using Affymetrix GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7G apparatus, and were analysed using Affymetrix GCOS Software (Affymetrix, CA, USA). Expression levels of all transcripts on chips were utilized for data normalization, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected according to standards as follows: fold change >2 and P‐value was <0.01.

Real‐time RT‐PCR

First‐strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA samples by two methods to verify differential expression levels of mRNA or miRNA transcripts. For the mRNA experiment, first‐strand cDNA was synthesized with random primers using Superscript III first‐strand synthesis system (Invitrogen). Subsequently, this sample was used to validate 15 genes including PRKCH , PTPN13, CD38, CD180, FCRL5, GPR160, HERC5, IFIT1, OAS3, RASGRP3, RFTS7H, TC2N, TCL1A, XAF1 and ZNF382. Real‐time RT‐PCR was conducted with a mixture (20 μl final volume) containing 100 ng of cDNA template, 2× SYBR Green Master Mix buffer (ABI), and forward and reverse primers for each gene. Primers were designed using GenBank nucleotide sequence for each gene. Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was employed as internal control. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. For the miRNA experiment, first‐strand cDNA samples were synthesized using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (ABI) and RT primer in TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (hsa‐miR‐146a), in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations (ABI). Then the real‐time RT‐PCR experiment was conducted with 20 μl of PCR mixture containing 1.33 μl of RT product, TaqMan 2× Universal PCR Master Mix (No AmpErase UNG) and TaqMan MicroRNA Assay (20X). RNU6B was used as internal control.

Table 1.

 Primers used for real‐time RT‐PCR experiments

Gene Forward primer Reverse primer
CD38 5′‐TTGGGAACTCAGACCGTACC‐3′ 5′‐GTTGCTGCAGTCCTTTCTCC‐3′
CD180 5′‐CACCTCCTGGGATCAGATGT‐3′ 5′‐TTGATGATGGCTTTGAAAAGTG‐3′
FCRL5 5′‐CCCTGTGCACTTGGATTTTT‐3′ 5′‐CAGCGATATGCACCATTGTC‐3′
GPR160 5′‐GTCAAGGAAGACCCACTGGA‐3′ 5′‐TAGGGGCTGGTTTGTTTGAC‐3′
HERC5 5′‐GATTGCTGGAGGGAATCAAA‐3′ 5′‐TTGGATTTCCCTTTTTGTGC‐3′
IFIT1 5′‐TCTCAGAGGAGCCTGGCTAA‐3′ 5′‐TCAGGCATTTCATCGTCATC‐3′
OAS3 5′‐GTCAAACCCAAGCCACAAGT‐3′ 5′‐TGTAGGCACACCTGGTGGTA‐3′
PRKCH 5′‐CCAGAATCAAATCCCGAGAA‐3′ 5′‐CTAAGGCTGATGCTGGGAAG‐3′
PTPN13 5′‐TTCTCTGCAGACCTCCACCT‐3′ 5′‐TCTTCTCCACTCCCACTGCT‐3′
RASGRP3 5′‐TGCATTTCCCAATGATGCTA‐3′ 5′‐AATGTTGCTGCTTTCCCAAG‐3′
RFTS7H 5′‐GCCTCAGTGAAGGTCTCCTG‐3′ 5′‐CTCCATGTAGGCTGTGCTGA‐3′
TC2N 5′‐TCCCAGGAAGAAAACCATTG‐3′ 5′‐GAAGGTACCGTGCCTCAAGA‐3′
TCL1A 5′‐TCCAGTTTCTGGCGCTTAGT‐3′ 5′‐TCTGTCCATTCCTCCCAGAC‐3′
XAF1 5′‐TTCAGCTCCTGAAAGGGAAA‐3′ 5′‐TTCAGCAGCTTGACTTGGAA‐3′
ZNF382 5′‐GCGCTTTACAGGGATGTGAT‐3′ 5′‐GAGGGGTCTAGAATGCCTGTC‐3′
GAPDH 5′‐CAGGGCTGCTTTTAACTCTGGTAA‐3′ 5′‐GTGGAATCATATTGGAACATGTAAACC‐3′

PCR reactions were run on an ABI HT 7900 (ABI) PCR system and cycle conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min. Comparative critical threshold (C t) value, obtained by real‐time RT‐PCR analysis, was used for relative quantification of gene expression. In this study, ΔC t value means C t value of the target gene relative to the control gene (C t, target gene‐C t, control gene). The ΔΔC t value represents ΔC t value of LCL at late passage compared to that at early passage [ΔΔC t = (C t, target gene‐C t, control gene)LCLs at the late passages − (C t, target gene‐C t, control gene)LCLs at the early passages]. All PCR reactions were conducted in duplicate in at least two independent experiments.

Correlation between gene expression pattern and clinical data

To identify clinical trait‐associated genes, correlations between microarray data from 20 LCLs at early passages and 23 quantitative clinical traits of blood donors were assessed by linear regression analysis using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). For each clinical trait, genes with highest correlation coefficients are summarized in Table 4. Twenty blood donors were aged between 41 and 69 years (mean ± SD, 55.3 ± 8.9), and included nine women and 11 men.

Table 4.

 Expression phenotypes correlated with 23 quantitative clinical features

Clinical data Gene symbola Gene Accession No. Coefficient R 2 P‐value
Height FGD4 NM_139241 0.830 0.689 <0.001
SQMS1 NM_147156 −0.792 0.628 <0.001
Weight CCNI2 NM_006835 0.839 0.703 <0.001
SAPS2 NM_014678 −0.691 0.478 0.001
Systolic blood pressure ZNF180 NM_013256 0.708 0.501 <0.001
STAMBPL1 NM_020799 −0.691 0.478 0.001
Diastolic blood pressure ST3GAL3 NM_174963 0.736 0.541 <0.001
LOC440087 NM_001013698 −0.706 0.499 0.001
Waist HTR7 NM_019859 0.721 0.520 <0.001
ACP2 NM_001610 −0.698 0.487 0.001
Hip STELLAR BC062480 0.814 0.662 <0.001
HSP90B3P NM_003130 −0.735 0.541 <0.001
Waist‐to‐Hip ratio KLHL10 NM_152467 0.742 0.551 <0.001
GYS2 NM_021957 −0.661 0.437 0.002
Body mass index (BMI) SERPINB12 NM_080474 0.850 0.722 <0.001
ACP2 NM_001610 −0.635 0.403 0.003
Distal radius Z NPC1L1 NM_013389 0.762 0.581 <0.001
MGC2752 BC001952 −0.803 0.645 <0.001
Total cholesterol RHOF NM_019034 0.722 0.522 <0.001
SLC40A1 NM_014585 −0.788 0.621 <0.001
HDL‐cholesterol NEFM NM_005382 0.784 0.615 <0.001
SLC24A5 NM_205850 −0.748 0.559 <0.001
Triglyceride ATF5 NM_012068 0.797 0.636 <0.001
SNAPIN NM_012437 −0.677 0.458 0.001
C‐reactive protein TMSL8 NM_021992 0.893 0.798 <0.001
FIZ1 NM_032836 −0.752 0.566 <0.001
HbA1C LAIR1 NM_002287 0.844 0.712 <0.001
CPNE1 NM_152930 −0.780 0.608 <0.001
WBC TMEM185B NR_000034 0.749 0.561 <0.001
ABCA10 ENST00000243451 −0.755 0.570 <0.001
RBC PYCR1 NM_006907 0.840 0.706 <0.001
CHRNA6 NM_004198 −0.740 0.548 <0.001
Haemoglobin PSAP1 NM_001085382 0.752 0.565 <0.001
DLGAP1 NM_004746 −0.768 0.590 <0.001
Haematocrit EIF2C2 NM_012154 0.770 0.593 <0.001
DLGAP1 NM_004746 −0.716 0.512 <0.001
Insulin_60 minb UBD NM_006398 0.749 0.561 <0.001
WIZ NM_021241 −0.634 0.402 0.003
Insulin_120 minb ERRF11 NM_018948 0.845 0.713 <0.001
ATOH8 NM_032827 −0.774 0.599 <0.001
Glucose_0 minb C21 BC080530 0.761 0.580 <0.001
SEC24A NM_021982 −0.731 0.534 <0.001
Glucose_60 minb FAHD2B NM_199336 0.739 0.545 <0.001
GAB3 NM_001081573 −0.778 0.605 <0.001
Glucose_120 minb APOC1 NM_001645 0.785 0.616 <0.001
NAT12 NM_001011713 −0.757 0.573 <0.001

aGenes exhibiting highest positive and negative correlations with each of the clinical factors presented.

bGlucose and insulin levels were measured at time points during oral glucose tolerance test. Insulin at 60 min, postprandial insulin level at 60 min; insulin at 120 min, postprandial insulin level at 120 min; glucose at 0 min, postprandial glucose level at 0 min; glucose at 60 min, postprandial glucose level at 60 min; glucose at 120 min, postprandial glucose level at 120 min.

Results

Microarray analysis

To identify gene expression changes during long‐term LCL subculture, we conducted a microarray experiment with LCL strains at early (p4, n = 20) and late (p161, n = 17) passages. Approximately, 500–1500 transcripts per LCL strain were differentially expressed at late passages compared to early passages; around 200–700 genes per LCL strain were upregulated at late passages and approximately 300–1000 genes were downregulated (Table 2). Among them, 16 transcripts were differentially expressed with greater than 2‐fold changes in at least 16 of the 17 LCL strains (Table 3). CD38 was downregulated and PTPN13 was upregulated in all 17 LCL strains at late passage compared to those at early passage. CD180 , FCRL5, GPR160, HERC5, IFIT1, OAS3, RASGRP3, RFTS7H, TC2N, TCL1A, XAF1, ZNF382 and miR‐146a were downregulated and PRKCH was upregulated in 16 of 17 LCLs at the late passage.

Table 2.

 Numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of each LCL strain

LCL strain No. upregulated DEGs No. downregulated DEGs No. total DEGs
A1 754 760 1514
A2 389 438 827
A3 575 707 1282
A4 285 693 978
A5 622 584 1206
A6 402 1051 1453
A8 230 670 900
A10 497 668 1165
K1 375 377 752
K2 325 590 915
K3 222 945 1167
K5 438 412 850
K6 230 301 531
K7 658 606 1264
K8 238 527 765
K9 230 289 519
K10 275 512 787

Approximately 1000 DEGs per each LCL strain were identified in comparison between early and late passages.

Table 3.

 Common transcripts expressed differentially in 17 LCL strains

Gene symbol mRNA Acc. No. Gene description 2‐fold changea Occurrenceb
CD38 NM_001775 CD38 molecule Down 17
PTPN13 NM_080685 Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non‐receptor type 13 [APO‐1/CD95 (Fas)‐associated phosphatase] Up 17
RFTS7H Z34893 Immunoglobulin gamma chain variable region, rheumatoid factor Down 16
None hsa‐miR‐146a Down 16
CD180 NM_005582 CD180 molecule Down 16
FCRL5 NM_031281 Fc receptor‐like 5 Down 16
GPR160 NM_014373 G protein‐coupled receptor 160 Down 16
HERC5 NM_016323 Hect domain and RLD 5 Down 16
IFIT1 NM_001548 Interferon‐induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 Down 16
OAS3 NM_006187 2′‐5′‐oligoadenylate synthetase 3, 100 kDa Down 16
PRKCH NM_006255 Protein kinase C, eta Up 16
RASGRP3 NM_170672 RAS guanyl releasing protein 3 (calcium and DAG‐regulated) Down 16
TC2N NM_152332 Tandem C2 domains, nuclear Down 16
TCL1A NM_021966 T‐cell leukaemia/lymphoma 1A Down 16
XAF1 NM_017523 XIAP‐associated factor‐1 Down 16
ZNF382 NM_032825 Zinc finger protein 382 Down 16

aFold change of gene expression in LCL strains at late passage relative to early passage.

bNumbers of LCL strains evidencing differential expression of corresponding genes among the 17 tested LCL strains.

Real‐time RT‐PCR analysis

To validate the microarray data, we conducted a real‐time RT‐PCR experiment for 16 DEGs in 17 LCL strains. As shown in Fig. 1 and Table S1, 16 transcripts showed expression patterns similar to the microarray results. Among them, PRKCH and PTPN13 had upregulated expression patterns in 16 LCLs at late passage, whereas 14 transcripts (CD38, CD180, FCRL5, GPR160, HERC5, IFIT1, OAS3, RASGRP3, RFTS7H, TC2N, TCL1A, XAF1, ZNF382 and miR‐146a) had downregulated expression patterns. All of 16 transcripts were up‐ or downregulated at late passage in at least 15 LCL strains (Table S1). Among these DEGs, downregulation of five transcripts (CD38, CD180, FCRL5, TC2N and miR‐146a) was validated by qPCR in all 17 LCL strains tested in our study. The biggest difference in gene expression levels was observed for the TC2N gene (mean of ΔΔC t values ± SD, 7.6 ± 3.22). These results suggest that these five DEGs represented passage‐dependent gene expression during long‐term subculture.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Real‐time RT‐PCR for 16 differentially expressed genes. Expression levels of 16 transcripts were assessed in 17 LCLs at late passage (p161) and early passage (p4). Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (STD) of ΔΔC t values [ΔΔC t value = ΔC t1(target gene C t − control gene C t)LCL at the late passages − ΔC t2(target gene C t − control gene C t)LCL at the early passages].

Correlation between gene expression phenotype and clinical data

To identify clinical feature‐related genes, microarray data from 20 LCLs at early passage were compared to 23 clinical parameters from donors. A gene list showing the highest positive and negative correlations (P < 0.01) with each clinical trait is provided in Table 4. For example, postprandial glucose level at 120 min (glucose_120) was the most positively or negatively correlated with apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) or N‐acetyltransferase 12 (NAT12) respectively (Table 4, Fig. S1). With regard to body mass index (BMI), we found that it was positively or negatively correlated to serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 12 (SERPINB12) or acid phosphatase 2, lysosomal (ACP2) respectively (Table 4, Fig. S1). For each clinical trait, expression phenotype (expression level of the transcript) with highest correlation coefficients would provide clues for molecular targets of the corresponding trait.

In the regression analysis, the top three highest coefficients of determination (R 2) were observed in measurements of C‐reactive protein, BMI and postprandial insulin levels at 120 min, which were associated with TMSL8 (R 2 = 0.798), SERPINB12 (R 2 = 0.722) and ERRF11 (R 2 = 0.713) respectively. This finding suggests that LCLs could be used in studies of these clinical traits or their related diseases. On the other hand, correlations between gene expression levels and clinical traits in LCLs at early passage (p4) were not represented in LCLs at late passage (p161), supporting the notion that expression phenotypes changed during long‐term subculture of LCLs.

Discussion

We employed a microarray approach to demonstrate gene expression changes in LCLs over long‐term culture. Results demonstrated that 16 transcripts were differentially expressed, with more than 2‐fold changes, being detected in at least 16 of 17 LCL strains at the late passage compared to those at early passage (Table 3). By performing the real‐time RT‐PCR experiment, we were able to determine that 16 transcripts showed expression patterns similar to the microarray results (Fig. 1, Table S1). All transcripts were expressed differentially in at least 15 of 17 LCL strains, thus suggesting that they may play a critical role in regulation of LCL immortalization. Nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) pathway‐associated genes (miR‐146a, PTPN13 and HERC5) were included among them. It has been reported that miR‐146a expression is induced by EBV‐encoded LMP1 via NF‐κB in lymphocytes (10). PTPN13 (11), HERC5 (12) and miR‐146a expression are associated with the NF‐κB pathway. PTPN13 negatively regulates the NF‐κB pathway via dephosphorylation of its substrate, IκBα (11), and HERC5 is overexpressed via NF‐κB signalling in activated endothelial cells (12). It has been demonstrated that the NF‐κB pathway regulates proliferation of LCL (13, 14) and transformation of EBV (11). Our data suggest that these functions may be regulated by miR‐146a, PTPN13 and HERC5. Furthermore, these 16 transcripts included carcinogenesis‐related transcripts such as XAF1, TCL1A, PTPN13, CD38, CD180 and miR‐146a. XAF1 has been reported as a novel tumour suppressor in colon cancer (15). The TCL1A oncogene has been identified as a regulator of T‐cell leukaemia and EBV‐positive B‐cell lymphoma (16, 17) and PTPN13 can regulate cancer cells as a tumour suppressor or as tumour promoter (11). CD38 is a marker for identification of two different profiles in germinal centre B‐cell lymphoma (18), and CD180 induces B‐cell population growth in mice (19). miR‐146a has been identified as a regulator of various cancers, including breast (20), thyroid (21, 22), cervical (23) and prostate cancers (20, 24). Thus, these six transcripts may possibly be involved in EBV‐transformed malignancies including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Moreover, TC2N, FCRL5, CD180, CD38 and miR‐146a, which were downregulated in all 17 LCLs at late passage, have potential as markers for LCL immortalization or EBV‐infected malignancies.

Subsequently, we determined correlations between expression phenotypes from 20 LCL strains at early passage and 23 quantitative clinical data from their donors (Table 4). In previous reports, molecular phenotype classifying tumour subtypes (25, 26, 27) and clinical features (26, 27, 28) has been identified by microarray approach. Diagnostic or prognostic biomarker candidates have also been evaluated in a variety of clinical diseases by gene expression profiling (29, 30). For example, villin1 (VIL1) has been identified as a diagnostic molecular marker of cervical adenocarcinoma by microarray analysis (30). Anal carcinoma was divided into two different subgroups by gene expression profiling, and upregulation of MCM7 and CDKN2A (p16) was identified as a marker for one of them (27). Microarray approach has also been used to identify obesity‐related genes from abdominal subcutaneous adipocytes of obese patients (31). The clinical feature‐related genes identified in our study may be candidate targets for study in a variety of diseases or clinical traits. For example, it has been reported that overexpression of APOC1 influences insulin resistance in ob/ob mice (32, 33). According to our data, expression of this gene correlated positively with postprandial glucose levels at 120 min (Table 4, Fig. S1). These results show that APOC1 may be a candidate target for diabetes studies. In the case of BMI, we detected positive correlation with expression level of SERPINB12 (Table 4, Fig. S1). This suggests that SERPINB12 gene expression may be a diagnostic marker in obesity.

In conclusion, we have shown that immortalization of LCLs may be regulated by 16 transcripts (PRKCH, PTPN13, CD38, CD180, FCRL5, GPR160, HERC5, IFIT1, OAS3, RASGRP3, RFTS7H, TC2N, TCL1A, XAF1, ZNF382 and miR‐146a), via the NF‐κB pathway. In addition, our study suggests that XAF1, TCL1A, PTPN13, CD38 and miR‐146a may play important roles in development of EBV‐infected malignant tissues as well as immortalization of LCLs. Moreover, TC2N, FCRL5, CD180, CD38 and miR‐146a, which were downregulated in all tested LCLs at the late passage, may possibly function as markers for LCL immortalization or EBV‐transformed malignancy.

Supporting information

Fig. S1 Expression phenotypes correlated with some clinical traits. The body mass index (BMI) was positively or negatively correlated with expression levels of serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 12 (SERPINB12) or acid phosphatase 2, lysosomal (ACP2), respectively. A postprandial glucose level at 120 min showed the highest positive or negative correlation with apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) or N‐acetyltransferase 12 (NAT12) respectively.

Table S1 Real‐time RT‐PCR experiment for 16 differentially expressed genes (DEGs).

Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Supporting info item

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by intramural grant 2007‐N00359‐00/2910‐212‐207 of the Korea National Institute of Health, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

  • 1. Hu VW, Sarachana T, Kim KS, Nguyen A, Kulkarni S, Steinberg ME et al. (2009) Gene expression profiling differentiates autism case‐controls and phenotypic variants of autism spectrum disorders: evidence for circadian rhythm dysfunction in severe autism. Autism Res. 2, 78–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Xie J, Techritz S, Haebel S, Horn A, Neitzel H, Klose J et al. (2005) A two‐dimensional electrophoretic map of human mitochondrial proteins from immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines: a prerequisite to study mitochondrial disorders in patients. Proteomics 5, 2981–2999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shukla SJ, Dolan ME (2005) Use of CEPH and non‐CEPH lymphoblast cell lines in pharmacogenetic studies. Pharmacogenomics 6, 303–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Valle M, Plon SE, Rabin KR (2009) Differential in vitro cytotoxicity does not explain increased host toxicities from chemotherapy in Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Res. 33, 336–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Brennan EP, Ehrich M, Brazil DP, Crean JK, Murphy M, Sadlier DM et al. (2009) Comparative analysis of DNA methylation profiles in peripheral blood leukocytes versus lymphoblastoid cell lines. Epigenetics 4, 159–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jeon JP, Shim SM, Nam HY, Baik SY, Kim JW, Han BG (2007) Copy number increase of 1p36.33 and mitochondrial henome amplification in Epstein‐Barr virus‐transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 173, 122–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jeon JP, Nam HY, Shim SM, Han BG (2009) Sustained viral activity of Epstein‐Barr virus contributes to cellular immortalization of lymphoblastoid cell lines. Mol. Cells 27, 143–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kim KJ, Lee HJ, Park MH, Cha SH, Kim KS, Kim HT et al. (2006) SNP identification, linkage disequilibrium, and haplotype analysis for a 200‐kb genomic region in a Korean population. Genomics 88, 535–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yoo YK, Ke X, Hong S, Jang HY, Park K, Kim S et al. (2006) Fine‐scale map of encyclopedia of DNA elements regions in the Korean population. Genetics 774, 491–497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cameron JE, Yin Q, Fewell C, Lacey M, McBride J, Wang X et al. (2008) Epstein‐Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces cellular microRNA miR‐146a, a modulator of lymphocyte signaling pathways. J. Virol. 82, 1946–1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Abaan OD, Toretsky JA (2008) PTPL1: a large phosphatase with a split personality. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 27, 205–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kroismayr R, Baranyi U, Stehlik C, Dorfleutner A, Binder BR, Lipp J (2004) HERC5, a HECT E3 ubiquitin ligase tightly regulated in LPS activated endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 117, 4749–4756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Forte E, Luftig MA (2009) MDM2‐dependent inhibition of p53 is required for Epstein‐Barr virus B‐cell growth transformation and infected‐cell survival. J. Virol. 83, 2491–2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Faumont N, Durand‐Panteix S, Schlee M, Gromminger S, Schuhmacher M, Holzel M et al. (2009) c‐Myc and Rel/NF‐kappaB are the two master transcriptional systems activated in the latency III program of Epstein‐Barr virus‐immortalized B cells. J. Virol. 83, 5014–5027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sun Y, Qiao L, Xia HH, Lin MC, Zou B, Yuan Y et al. (2008) Regulation of XAF1 expression in human colon cancer cell by interferon ß: activation by the transcription regulator STAT1. Cancer Lett. 260, 62–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pekarsky Y, Hallas C, Croce CM (2001) Molecular basis of mature T‐cell leukemia. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 286, 2308–2314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Teitell MA (2005) The TCL1 family of oncoproteins: co‐activators of transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 640–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosenwald A et al. (2001) Distinct types of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403, 503–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Miyake K, Yamashita Y, Hitoshi Y, Takatsu K, Kimoto M (1994) Murine B cell proliferation and protection from apoptosis with as antibody against a 105‐kd molecule: unresponsiveness of X‐linked immunodeficient B cells. J. Exp. Med. 180, 1217–1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F et al. (2006) A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2257–2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Jazdzewski K, Murray EL, Franssila K, Jarzab B, Schoenberg DR, De La Chapelle A (2008) Common SNP in pre‐miR‐146a decreases mature miR expression and predisposes to papillary thyroid carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7269–7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. He H, Jazdzewski K, Li W, Liyanarachchi S, Nagy R, Volinia S et al. (2005) The role of microRNA genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 19075–19080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wang X, Tang S, Le SY, Lu R, Rader JS, Meyers C et al. (2008) Aberrant expression of oncogenic and tumor‐suppressive microRNAs in cervical cancer is required for cancer cell growth. PLoS One 3, e2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lin SL, Chiang A, Chang D, Ying SY (2008) Loss of mir‐146a function in hormone‐refractory prostate cancer. RNA 14, 417–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ishihara A, Tsuda H, Kitagawa K, Yoneda M, Shiraishi T (2009) Morphological characteristics of basal‐like subtype of breast carcinoma with special reference to cytopathological features. Breast Cancer 16, 179–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tothill RW, Tinker AV, George J, Brown R, Fox SB, Lade S et al. (2008) Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 5198–5208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bruland O, Fluge O, Immervoll H, Balteskard L, Myklebust M, Skarstein A et al. (2008) Gene expression reveals two distinct groups of anal carcinomas with clinical implications. Br. J. Cancer 98, 1264–1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Dellas A, Jundt G, Sartorius G, Schneider M, Moch H (2009) Combined PTEN and p27kip1 protein expression patterns are associated with obesity and prognosis in endometrial carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 2456–2462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Colombo J, Fachel AA, De FreitasCalmon M, Cury PM, Fukuyama EE, Tajara EH et al. (2009) Gene expression profiling reveals molecular marker candidates of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 21, 649–643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Nakamura E, Iwakawa M, Furuta R, Ohno T, Satoh T, Nakawatari M et al. (2009) Villin1, a novel diagnostic marker for cervical adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther. 8, 1146–1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dolinkova M, Dostalova I, Lacinova Z, Michalsky D, Haluzikova D, Mraz M et al. (2008) The endocrine profile of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue of obese patients. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 291, 63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Muurling M, Van Den Hoek AM, Mensink RP, Pijl H, Romijn JA, Havekes LM et al. (2004) Overexpression of APOC1 in obob mice leads to hepatic steatosis and severe hepatic insulin resistance. J. Lipid Res. 45, 9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Jong MC, Voshol PJ, Muurling M, Dahlmans VE, Romijn JA, Pijl H et al. (2001) Protection from obesity and insulin resistance in mice overexpressing human apolipoprotein C1. Diabetes 50, 2779–2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1 Expression phenotypes correlated with some clinical traits. The body mass index (BMI) was positively or negatively correlated with expression levels of serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 12 (SERPINB12) or acid phosphatase 2, lysosomal (ACP2), respectively. A postprandial glucose level at 120 min showed the highest positive or negative correlation with apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) or N‐acetyltransferase 12 (NAT12) respectively.

Table S1 Real‐time RT‐PCR experiment for 16 differentially expressed genes (DEGs).

Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Supporting info item


Articles from Cell Proliferation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES